Jump to content

User talk:Hudlag: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Thank you!: new section
Line 205: Line 205:
::::@{{u|Hellknowz}}, I find it extremely bizarre & Like you rightfully said a CU is definitely required at this juncture. I was going to open an SPI but the sheer number of accounts involved deterred me. Invariably this is a sock farm & I believe the accounts are being nurtured to cause great harm to the encyclopedia in future, it isn’t uncommon for them to start off with constructive editing, in fact, that it is their modus operandi. I have for now decided to gently warn {{u|Hudlag}} & let them know I’m keeping a close eye on them, to say this is baffling and annoying would be an understatement. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 14:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
::::@{{u|Hellknowz}}, I find it extremely bizarre & Like you rightfully said a CU is definitely required at this juncture. I was going to open an SPI but the sheer number of accounts involved deterred me. Invariably this is a sock farm & I believe the accounts are being nurtured to cause great harm to the encyclopedia in future, it isn’t uncommon for them to start off with constructive editing, in fact, that it is their modus operandi. I have for now decided to gently warn {{u|Hudlag}} & let them know I’m keeping a close eye on them, to say this is baffling and annoying would be an understatement. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 14:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::I don't actually think Hudlag is part of the sockfarm. I think it's a coincidence that socks jumped on this article. After all, some accounts are editing other articles and those articles also have other new accounts editing. There's dozens of them just looking around. And their pattern just doesn't match Hudlag's editing. I mean, if true, Hudlag could have done all these edits on their main account and no one would have an issue. Why the endless socks? This doesn't make sense to me. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 15:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::I don't actually think Hudlag is part of the sockfarm. I think it's a coincidence that socks jumped on this article. After all, some accounts are editing other articles and those articles also have other new accounts editing. There's dozens of them just looking around. And their pattern just doesn't match Hudlag's editing. I mean, if true, Hudlag could have done all these edits on their main account and no one would have an issue. Why the endless socks? This doesn't make sense to me. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 15:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

== Thank you! ==

:Hi Hud, welcome to Wikipedia. I read some of the articles you started, thanks for your contributions!
::Regards, [[User:Stormy Chamber|Stormy Chamber]] ([[User talk:Stormy Chamber|talk]]) 18:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:25, 16 January 2021

Yusuf Abdullahi Ata

Hello. I moved the article you created about Yusuf Abdullahi Ata so that it's now under his name: Yusuf Abdullahi Ata. Largoplazo (talk) 23:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hud-InfoTech Nig. Ltd., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hud Adam Ali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 11:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ibrahim Muhammad Kankarofi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibrahim Muhammad Kankarofi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Muhammad Kankarofi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hud Adam Ali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Hud Adam Ali. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hudlag. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Visit Kano, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Visit Kano

Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Hudlag, thanks for creating Visit Kano!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You need some independent third party RS

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a COI relating to this subject?Slatersteven (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should not unilaterally decide that you do not have a COI (or an article should not be deleted). Delete these again and I will have to report it.Slatersteven (talk) 11:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Visit Kano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yusuf Abdullahi Ata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Engineer Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Engineer Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CentreLeftRight 07:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hudlag! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Celestina007 (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amina Adamu Aliyu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BL. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks I have done that

Capping and linking

Hi, thanks for your work. Please note my edits here, which correct some issues. Tony (talk) 10:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

     Thanks I am Grateful

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hudlag

Thank you for creating Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please see WP:CITE & adjust the referencing style. Read WP:MOS also. Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uba Danzainab for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uba Danzainab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uba Danzainab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

  // Timothy :: talk  01:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Uba Danzainab. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Even if you believe you have resolved the issues, the discussion is still taking place. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hellknowz, generally I think there’s something very strange going on with their account. Celestina007 (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hellknowz, Thanks I am new its today that I learned to reply I have no one to guide me on how to do things in wikipedia I am all alone! I will appreciate it If you will guide me and I learned that the page has been deleted can I re-create the article and improve it? Hudlag

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Amina Adamu Aliyu. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

```noted with thanks Hudlag

Nomination of Mustapha Bala Getso for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustapha Bala Getso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustapha Bala Getso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 00:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

```Reply``` Before 2019 Nigerian general election there are 91 political parties in Nigeria and his name is in list of the party chairmen but after the election in February 2020 Independent National Electoral Commission deregistered 74 political parties which NPM is included now there are only 18 political parties in Nigeria as at now and he later Joint Peoples Democratic Party — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hudlag (talkcontribs) 08:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation required urgently

You created this article & a plethora of newly registered single purpose accounts (more than a dozen) began to edit the article ferociously, you wouldn’t happen to know anything about that yeah? Please read WP:SOCK & WP:MEAT. If you are using multiple accounts to edit an article, it is wrong & would get you permanently blocked from editing here any further. Also, you aren’t allowed to go off-wiki and coordinate with your friends to edit a particular article in a counter-productive manner. Thank you for complying in advance. Celestina007 (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

```@Celestina007 Hello, I am Hud by name, Nigerian and I did not have any other account on Wiki beside this Hudlag, regarding this I never know any person among the contributor to this article.

I created this article due to the fact that, in My State (Kano State) we are almost 20 Million but I don't think we have up-to 10 Wikipedia-contributors that are active as I am now and who will pay for an article of a dead person? but I know the Man contributed a lot during his life time and he even wrote a book about his life called "The Making of a Nigerian Engineer" Published by (Safari Books Ltd) ISBN: Cased 978-978-57696-0-9 Paperback 978-978-57696-1-6.

I have no interest of doing anything that will make my account to be blocked from editing an article on Wiki, because I can say I am the only Contributor from Kano State Nigeria that will dedicated his time on Wikipedia for others to get general information about Kano State because the information on Wikipedia is very poor and I wanted to improve it and I will appreciated if you will be guiding me on writing and editing article with Pictures on wiki

best regards, I really appreciate your effort Celestina007

@Hudlag, Careful now, you left this message on my talk page & I’m not sure why because this was the message I left on your talkpage & no where in it did I say you were getting paid for the creation of the article & neither did I insinuate that in any which way so I’m surprised you are bringing that up. What I asked you was why at least 12 newly registered accounts had their first edits straight to that article & told you to read both WP:SOCK & WP:MEAT, so like I said I’m not sure why you brought up the issue of paid editing when I clearly never referenced that, or is there something subtle I’m missing here? Celestina007 (talk) 10:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
            ::@Celestina007 I understand you thanks but I didn't know any of the contributor of the article and I have only one account that is Hudlag
@Celestina007: I find it extremely unlikely that this many new accounts would focus on an individual article at the same time. It's not impossible if the person is in news or something, but usually this is accompanied by equal amounts of bad editing and vandalism, but all edits here are passably constructive. I see new accounts already blocked in article's history, so do you think this is the same sockfarm and that Hudlag is caught in the middle coincidentally? Looking at some articles from these blocked accounts, it's all new accounts all over. I don't think there's any hope here without a CU blanket check. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hellknowz, I find it extremely bizarre & Like you rightfully said a CU is definitely required at this juncture. I was going to open an SPI but the sheer number of accounts involved deterred me. Invariably this is a sock farm & I believe the accounts are being nurtured to cause great harm to the encyclopedia in future, it isn’t uncommon for them to start off with constructive editing, in fact, that it is their modus operandi. I have for now decided to gently warn Hudlag & let them know I’m keeping a close eye on them, to say this is baffling and annoying would be an understatement. Celestina007 (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't actually think Hudlag is part of the sockfarm. I think it's a coincidence that socks jumped on this article. After all, some accounts are editing other articles and those articles also have other new accounts editing. There's dozens of them just looking around. And their pattern just doesn't match Hudlag's editing. I mean, if true, Hudlag could have done all these edits on their main account and no one would have an issue. Why the endless socks? This doesn't make sense to me. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 15:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Hud, welcome to Wikipedia. I read some of the articles you started, thanks for your contributions!
Regards, Stormy Chamber (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]