User talk:RHaworth/2023 Apr 08

Speedy deletion of Robert Thompson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Robert Thompson (bassoonist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.robertthompson75.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 18:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Moneytrees: Roger isn't very active right now and may not see your notice. However, as you can see from the draft's page history, the page was actually written by User:Tonybarlow. I understand that your notice was an automated addition, but it's probably worth checking page histories before dropping notices that are meant for newbies on the talk pages of one of Wikipedia's most prolific editors and (former) admins. -- RexxS (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Mr. A

HI, I don't know why you keep deleting or rejecting my pages, I am a producer who represents some major A list celebrities /actors can you authorize them please, as you will see on the page I created I have listed many links to recent articles to back up my claims as a Hollywood rep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dansegr (talk • contribs) 15:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Remember me?

Hi, it's been a long time. A long time ago you deleted an article that I created, Nahua religion. It was about a modern religion based on the ancient religion of the Aztecs. Well, how do you feel about this? Like my old article, it has only two sources, both of which are extremely biased because they're the religion's teachers teaching the religion online. That was a problem last time. Or is the name nicer, the text more fulfilling and grammatically correct, and the pictures too pretty to delete it?

Do you have any intentions to delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacape (talk • contribs) 07:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wacape: In response to your first paragraph, might I refer you to WP:OTHER? As for your closing question – if you have good-faith concerns about the validity of an article, you are free to start a deletion discussion citing the specific content policies and guidelines that you believe it violates. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I have no feelings about Mexicayotl. I will not do anything to it or concerning it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

"Southbank (2)" listed at RfD

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Southbank (2). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 25#Southbank (2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

About User:Ccmontgom/Lee Ze-ha

Dear RHaworth. I am reviewing articles written by User:Ccmontgom, the Han Moo-sook article among them. It seems that this author is/was a Professor in Seoul, related to the Literature Translation Institute of Korea. Obviously, this user can also be a blatant liar, and be a Los Angeles kid playing to Wikipedia. But shouldn't we start by assuming good faith? I would be interested to obtain a copy of the User:Ccmontgom/Lee Ze-ha page that was deleted as a shameful advertisement. Some years later, it could be checked if this was that shameful, or simply a too enthusiastic way of writing. Thanks in advance. Pldx1 (talk) 10:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Pldx1: Roger is not very active lately, and won't be able to help you. I've put a copy of the article that was deleted into your user space at User:Pldx1/Lee Ze-ha. I would be grateful if you would ping me when you've finished with it, and I can re-delete it as WP:CSD G11. Cheers -- RexxS (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

• In fact, as you can see from the box at the top of this page, I am back in a restrained sort of way and I am still able to use the extensive array of tools still available to me here. If either of you had done likewise, you would have found Lee Ze-ha which was created by Ccmontgom on 2013 Dec 07. Ccmontgom was clearly in the habit of creating userspace drafts for the people they were writing about. RexxS: will probably be able to confirm a creation date for User:Ccmontgom/Lee Ze-ha of circa 2013 Dec - as well as being blatant spam it was probably also a copyvio from some publisher's blurb. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:17, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

  Pldx1, RexxS it does look like a copyvio from here. That user page should probably be re-deleted. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC) (Can't bloody type, re-ping RexxS GirthSummit _(blether) 10:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC))

  • Dear all. Thanks for everything. The page User:Pldx1/Lee Ze-ha can be deleted (and is already tagged for speedy). It seems this was a temporary copy from something found in the web, to be used when writing an article, and to be deleted afterwards, with no intent to move this user's page into the main space. In fact, this paragraph is the English abstract of an accepted Thesis, 2009. You can use Google to translate this thesis, the result is not so bad as a translation, and remains informative. Pldx1 (talk) 12:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

    Thanks, Girth Summit, for sorting that out. I wouldn't refund a page deleted as WP:CSD G12, but I didn't see the same problem with the original G11 deletion. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 17:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi. InellectualThinker vandalizes articles. I want him to be blocked. - Aybeg (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

• Learn to provide links whenever you mention a page or user name. At a quick glance InellectualThinker's edits are cack-handed but I would not call them vandalism. Try engaging them in discussion. In any case I am no longer an admin and cannot block anybody. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

"Final testament" listed at RfD

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Final testament. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4#Final testament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 05:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

"223-episode series" listed at RfD

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 223-episode series. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#223-episode series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

"Supercalifragilexpialidocious" listed at RfD

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Supercalifragilexpialidocious. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 25#Supercalifragilexpialidocious until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hyemeyohsts Storm

I was trying to create this entry because this person is notable, but creation of this page has been locked – and it referred me to you. Would it be possible to unlock this entry so I can create an entry? Lavenderearlgrey (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• Always provide a link when you talk about any page. I no longer have admin rights so go to Requests for page protection and make sure you provide a link thus: Hyemeyohsts Storm. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Rule of thirds (diving) (disambiguation)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rule of thirds (diving) (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 11#Rule of thirds (diving) (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Adda52

Draft:Adda52 is been created by me before a month. I noticed later that this is a blocked page. Request you to please have a look and help me to create it. — 1друг (talk) 02:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• I am no longer an admin so I could not unprotect Adda52 even if I wanted to. Be patient - your draft has been up for less than a fortnight. Two years is sufficient for the company to have become notable, so be upfront and explain in Draft talk:Adda52 what has changed since the AfD discussion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Robert Thompson (bassoonist)

Draft:Robert Thompson (bassoonist), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Robert Thompson (bassoonist) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Robert Thompson (bassoonist) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Launchballer 05:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

I would like to create the article "Battle for Dream Island".

Battle for Dream Island is a notable YouTube series from Jacknjellify. It started in 2010 and is still running today. The most popular episode had 61M+ views. Go to jacknjellify.com for proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.85.42.65 (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

"Mahlon (Sandy) Apgar, IV, …" listed at RfD

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mahlon (Sandy) Apgar, IV, CRE, FRICS, FIOD, FRSA. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 22#Mahlon (Sandy) Apgar, IV, CRE, FRICS, FIOD, FRSA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Alansohn (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Ziba Design

Hi! This is a super long-shot, so absolutely no worries if you have no memory of it whatsoever and/or no inclination to offer advice (seriously, I read the above, and I genuinely don't mind if you're taking it easy and can't be bothered) :) So anyway...

I just followed a dead link from Microsoft_ergonomic_keyboards to Ziba_Design, which seemed to have been deleted; so, being the curious type I thought I'd look at Talk:Ziba_Design and see why the page was deleted, but of course that was deleted too (by you, hence why I'm 'randomly' posting on your Talk page, even though that deletion was 6 clear years ago!) after the main page had been gone a while ...and now we've reached the extent of my very limited knowledge of editing Wikipedia. Is there any way I can find out why that page was deleted, to see if there's any point in trying to create a new one or not?

Alternatively, or possibly preferably given that I have no content for such a page... I had a search for 'ziba' and found the Ziba disambiguation page which (as well as having a not-even-a-link-any-more to the Ziba Design page, also names the founder of same, Sohrab Vossoughi - who does have a page, just about (it has the stub insert, but looks legit if skimpy). Would it be appropriate to point the Ziba Design link on the MS keyboard page to his page? Or to create a redirect from Ziba Design to his page? I don't know what the consensus opinion is for an indirect relationship like that, is it 'better than nothing' or 'worse than nothing'? I don't even know where to find out the answer to that last question... so here I am, asking you stupid questions instead. :D

Thank you for your time reading this essay! And thanks for any reply, but like I say, no worries if there is none. :) Denny de la Haye (talk) 23:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Dennymeta, the Ziba Design article was proposed for deletion as being written in a promotional tone by a paid editor, and then deleted after a week with nobody contesting it. You could try a new draft of the article if you think you have enough reliable sources to support notability. A redirect from Ziba Design to Sohrab Vossoughi should be fine as it's mentioned in that article. Schazjmd (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

- Thanks Schazjmd! Could I have found this out for myself? And if so, how? (If you don't mind teaching kingergarten for a moment?) :) Denny de la Haye (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• Schazjmd, Found what out for yourself? If you mean why was it deleted, then you could have found out very easily: you know that I deleted it so you must have seen the deletion log entry where the reason for deletion follows the words "RHaworth (talk|contribs) deleted page". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

-- RHaworth, I think you're now having a go at Schazjmd when you should be aiming your ire at me (along with any other offence I seem to have caused, I also apologise for not knowing how to indent my replies properly!) Although actually, tearing strips off of neither of us would be preferable. Please assume good faith on my part? I posted a genuine enquiry here, I'm really not trying to wind you up or cause trouble, and I did try very hard to frame my questions in a way that put as little obligation on you to answer as possible. I'm just a very inexperienced editor and I was asking advice on how to find this stuff out. I don't know how I missed the reason after your name on that page before, I do see it now. I'm going to leave the whole thing well alone at this point because I have no personal interest in the page and I _really_ don't want to be anywhere near being in the path of whatever your problem is with ... well, pretty much everybody, judging by the other replies on here. I'm sorry for bothering you - particularly if by doing so, I'm responsible for you spending more time here when you don't seem to enjoy it very much :-\ I'm posting this Sunday morning where I am, I'll delete it Monday evening and be out of your hair - sorry for taking up your time and energy with my ignorant questions. Denny de la Haye (talk) 08:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

• Anything at Ziba Design would be worse than nothing because it would mask the need for a full article. It would be inappropriate to write up the design company within the Sohrab Vossoughi article. A quick check suggests that the company is notable enough to qualify for an article. So: either write an article for us or leave things as they are. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

-- Gosh, strong opinion :) Okay, thanks for your time in replying, I appreciate it! Denny de la Haye (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

TestOps

I learned that you may have created a page called TestOps. I'm trying to create a similar page and guidance suggested I review your draft or deleted testOps page to better understand if I'm suggesting any thing different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grizfisher (talk • contribs) 2021 Apr 28 23:09 (UTC)

• No - I deleted Draft:TestOps because it was an abandoned draft. What you should do now is submit your Draft:TestOps for review. If it gets accepted then the redirect currently at TestOps will be replaced by your article and someone should add {{Main|TestOps}} at DevOps#TestOps.

Incidentally, I feel the CoI notice in your user page is unnecessary even if you are an employee of a company such as infopulse that uses testops. Instead just state in plain text what your interest in testops is. If you were writing an article about a testops-related company then a CoI notice would be mandatory. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

The Synoptic Gospel - Deleted

Hello, Roger! I am writing to request help to get an article for The Synoptic Gospel onto Wikipedia. You deleted that article several years ago, and I would like to know how to get the article onto Wikipedia. It says that before uploading a new version of the article, that I should contact you. Could you please allow me to upload a revised article? There are some new links and The Synoptic Gospel is an important, noteworthy book that deserves its own page on Wikipedia. Thank You. Malchus Biblion (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

• You don't really deserve a reply - this edit was totally selfish - do not repeat it. If you really insist on publicising your book, create Draft:The Synoptic Gospel written in non-spammy language with evidence of notability and with a COI notice on the talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Austria

RHaworth, I noticed that you deleted The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Austria in June 2016. I'm not sure what was on the page content at the time. I've created Draft:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Austria and curious if you wanted to review, see if it's acceptable, and provide recommendations. The current version was written similar to other LDS in ___ pages, with the content of each page being generally unique to that country. Other versions of this page exist in the Spanish and Portuguese versions of Wikipedia. Thanks. - Dmm1169 (talk) 03:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

• If you know that I deleted the original, then you should also have seen the deletion reason: "article has no meaningful, substantive content". I have made one small mod to your draft. I think it is good enough that, rather than waiting possibly weeks for review, you could move it yourself to mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:54, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Friction

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Technical details of friction-plate electromagnetic clutch. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 23#Technical details of friction-plate electromagnetic clutch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Wasila Diwura-Soale

Hello Good day, Please I tried to create an article of Wasila Diwura-Soale who is a Ghanaian international footballer. But I faced a challenge saying I require administrator access which indicates also that you were the administrator who deleted the page. The subject is a Ghanaian international footballer who had capped for the Ghana national women's team. Can you please give me access to recreate the page. Thank you. Ampimd (talk) 14:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

• Sorry, I am no longer an admin. I suggest you create your article at draft:Wasila Diwura-Soale and then ask Espresso Addict (talk · contribs) who also deleted one state of the page in mainspace or any other admin. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

The London Coal and Wine Duties Continuance Act 1861

Hello. In answer to your recent message, I cannot find a scan of this Act. Unless you can find one, you would have to use a book that contains the text of the Act. A number of scans of such books have already been uploaded to the commons, and others are available on the Google Books. The Statutes of the United Kingdom, by Rickards, includes a copy of the text of this Act at page 144 et seq. The index page on wikisource is at s:Index:The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1861 (24 & 25 Victoria).pdf. If you follow the redlinked page numbers in the index page (which link to the Page: namespace), an edit window with a page image and OCR text should come up automatically. You then correct the OCR text and save the page namespace page. The Queen's Printer edition seems to be "A Collection of the Public General Statutes". The commons file is at commons:File:A collection of the public general statutes passed in the ... year of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria .. (IA acollectionpubl18britgoog).pdf. There are also scans of this on Google Books: [1] [2] [3] [4]. This seems to be the most authentic text available. The Metropolis Local Management Acts, Second Edition, 1880, by Woolrich has an annotated text of the Act at page 237 et seq. The commons file is at commons:File:California Digital Library (IA metropolislocalm00wooliala).pdf. This file seems to be the best available in terms of image quality. There are also scans of the first and third editions on the Internet Archive and Google Books: [5] [6]. If you want to use the Queen's Printer edition or the second edition of Woolrych now on the commons, you would need to create an index page on wikisource. An index page for woolrych, for example, would be located at s:Index:California Digital Library (IA metropolislocalm00wooliala).pdf. If you were to follow that redlink and click "save page", an index page for the correct file would be created. Please let me know if you need any further help. James500 (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I just noticed that you were back, I'm glad to see you around and just wanted to say welcome back. —PaleoNeonate – 07:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cast of Teen Wolf

Template:Cast of Teen Wolf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

"Bear Creek (Yellow River, Iowa)," listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bear Creek (Yellow River, Iowa),. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Bear Creek (Yellow River, Iowa), until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dyslexia support by country has been nominated for renaming

Category:Dyslexia support by country has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"Keibu keioiba" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Keibu keioiba. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 30#Keibu keioiba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —AFreshStart (talk) 03:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I saw that you performed a deletion of Western Wheel Works. I was thinking of making an article on the subject and wondered if you could give me an idea if that would be ok. Thanks Bruxton (talk) 16:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I just saw the statement on the top apologies. Bruxton (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

"Daily Post (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Daily Post (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26#Daily Post (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bison X (talk) 08:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Inverse Warburg Effect

Dear Mr. Haworth

I would like you to consider resurrecting the Wikipedia article on the Inverse Warburg effect, deleted 31st July 2017. The main reason given for its deletion was that the phenomenon described was "too fringe".

National newspapers in Germany and Switzerland, however, have published major articles focussing on this novel metabolic approach to explaining Alzheimer's Disease, based on the Inverse Warburg effect. (https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wissen/medizin-ernaehrung/streitgespraech-alzheimer-heilung-wie-nah-ist-man-wirklich-dran-13722068.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2 / https://www.nzz.ch/wissenschaft/gestoerte-energieversorgung-im-gehirn-1.18483527) A similar article in English, likewise addressed to the general public, can be found in the Harvard Gazette (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/02/a-new-understanding-of-alzheimers/)

The fundamental publication "Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid hypothesis and the Inverse Warburg effect" by Demetrius, Magistretti and Pellerin (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00522/full) has had 30.732 views (This is more than 98% of all Frontiers articles), and so far has received 138 citations. Is that "too fringe"?

The most recent publication based on the Inverse Warburg concept is "Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease: metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic intervention", which came out in 2021 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043276021002198). - The theory is very much alive!

In view of the current rejection of the Amyloid model for Alzheimer's disease, the major competing theory of the origin of neurodegenerative disorders, the bioenergetic model, based on the Inverse Warburg effect, would be of interest to Wikipedia readers.

Sincerely

         Hasperaspaeragus