User talk:Trillfendi

As of Indigenous Peoples' Day 2019, these are the ground rules around these parts: do not leave messages here unless it pertains to article creation, a Good Article nomination, an automated comment from a bot, a barnstar, an invitation to join a WikiProject, requesting help, or something important. Anything else will not be entertained. DISCRETION IS ADVISED.

DYK for Rebecca Leigh Longendyke

On 21 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rebecca Leigh Longendyke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fashion model Rebecca Leigh Longendyke was inspired by Grey's Anatomy to get a degree in biomedical engineering? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebecca Leigh Longendyke. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rebecca Leigh Longendyke), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216 Online events: New: "Double the lede!" | Women who died in 2021 Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change and preparations for our 2022 Climate initiative Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bree Warren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Daisy (perfume)

Hello! Your submission of Daisy (perfume) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hyun Ji Shin

On 20 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hyun Ji Shin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hyun Ji Shin was photographed by Karl Lagerfeld in his Chanel campaign before his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hyun Ji Shin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hyun Ji Shin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,233 views (519.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Alisha Kramer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Big Four

Hi, you previously participated in the Big Four international beauty pageants Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four international beauty pageants (2nd nomination) and I'm notifying all the previous participants since the article is currently nominated for deletion for the third time in this link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four international beauty pageants (3rd nomination) in case you want to chime in.---Richie Campbell (talk) 06:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kendra Sunderland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kendra Sunderland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendra Sunderland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers 21:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@Firefangledfeathers: I fix a birth place in accordance with the actual guideline, none of this is controversial, and I'm supposed to then be scared of some "sanctions"? Trillfendi (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

I hope you're not scared! Big emphasis on the "does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions". Firefangledfeathers 22:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Daisy (perfume)

On 3 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daisy (perfume), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marc Jacobs's fragrance Daisy is cottagecore? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daisy (perfume). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daisy (perfume)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Timothée Chalamet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nicole Hernandez Hammer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nicole Hernandez Hammer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet

The article Timothée Chalamet you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Timothée Chalamet for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Timothée Chalamet

The article Timothée Chalamet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Timothée Chalamet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Alisha Kramer

On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alisha Kramer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alisha Kramer worked to fight HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and inequity in women's health in Africa and Europe as a program coordinator for the Center for Strategic and International Studies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alisha Kramer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alisha Kramer), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Linking on Nicholas Hoult

When you said we literally cannot put [[ ]] on a nonexistent article,[1] did you mean to say that we should include Holly's most complete (and sourceable) name because she doesn't have her own article and that it would be appropriate to simply link Bryana Holly once she does have her own article? KyleJoan^talk 17:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@KyleJoan: Pretty much. Trillfendi (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Well, WP:BLPPRIVACY applies in all BLP articles, so that name's inclusion in an article about Holly would also be a violation of that policy. The overarching point about whether to include the name is not that it would be in Holly's article, therefore, it should be in Hoult's article; it is that it wouldn't be in Holly's article, therefore, it shouldn't be in Hoult's article. KyleJoan^talk 03:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Vivienne Rohner

On 27 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vivienne Rohner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fashion model Vivienne Rohner, named after fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, opened one of Westwood's shows during her first season as a model? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vivienne Rohner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vivienne Rohner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Model images advice

I found a Creative Commons Attribution licensed video from Paco Rabanne and was able to extract images for 10 models that we had articles for but no images. Most were written by you. So, first: hope you like! Second, I'd like your advice. I made a headshot and a full length image from each for each article; some images are better than others, some articles are longer than others so have more room, then there is the Noordhoff case, which are great images, but really not the best for showing what she looks like - in short, I put these all in, but do some of these need to be removed? There may be a few other similar videos, and I'd appreciate your learned guidance for next time.

• 
  Draft:Malika Louback
• 
  Felice Nova Noordhoff
• 
  Hannah Motler
• 
  Hannah Motler
• 
  Felice Nova Noordhoff
• 
  Signe Veiteberg
• 
  Estelle Chen
• 
  Signe Veiteberg
• 
  Licett Morillo
• 
  Licett Morillo
• 
  Giselle Norman
• 
  Giselle Norman
• 
  Mona Tougaard
• 
  Mona Tougaard
• 
  Draft:Malika Louback
• 
  Fran Summers
• 
  Fran Summers
• 
  Africa Peñalver
• 
  Africa Peñalver
• 
  Estelle Chen

--GRuban (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@GRuban: I think the one of Felice Noordhoff can stand to be removed because her face is too obscured. I can tell it's her, but the average person wouldn't have any idea. Trillfendi (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Done--GRuban (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nicole Hernandez Hammer

The article Nicole Hernandez Hammer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nicole Hernandez Hammer for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 08:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Cheslie Kryst

On 1 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cheslie Kryst, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 00:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Shia LaBeouf

Your edit summary for adding in that they are expecting made me chuckle lol LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

COI change on Chanel

Greetings! I have seen you have made a recent change on Chanel. Are you able to help make a few more factual changes as I have a COI. Details in the request page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chanel#requestedit Occasionalpedestrian (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)