Jump to content

Talk:YouTube: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Line 85: Line 85:
--Henrik Erlandsson 00:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
--Henrik Erlandsson 00:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
:We require third-party sources to make any claims related to these changes. We cannot deduce from disparate information to come to a conclusion. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 03:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
:We require third-party sources to make any claims related to these changes. We cannot deduce from disparate information to come to a conclusion. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 03:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
::[[User:Masem|@Masem]] [[Special:Contributions/97.94.157.81|97.94.157.81]] ([[User talk:97.94.157.81|talk]]) 18:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2023 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2023 ==

Revision as of 18:59, 30 July 2023

Template:Vital article

Former good articleYouTube was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
February 28, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 20, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 4, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 17, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 9, 2009Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 15, 2010, and February 15, 2012.
Current status: Delisted good article


Something Missing

Where are the criticisms and controversies? I know there are reliable sources. I feel like it would fail the broadness criterion of a GAN without any of the bad reception. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR 97.94.157.81 (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes? QuicoleJR (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We could sleuth some information to share truth on Wikipedia.

  1. What is the real reason (mentioned without citationneeded, strangely, which makes it weasel-words) for removing dislikes? I was quite proud of my 500- to 0 likes/dislikes over 50+ videos shared. It deserves a prize on Youtube, more than obviously pleasing videos, it's a highly technical subject and so requires 100% accuracy in sharing information.
  2. Why was the decision made to destroy Youtube functionality with Made for Kids? Extremely few allow comment censoring as usual, but the kicker is, you can't even put cartoons on a playlist for kids. It's so [stupidhttps://support.google.com/youtube/thread/25007475/why-can-t-i-favourite-a-video?hl=en stupid] it requires investigation.
  3. There is not enough historical information here about Google Videos being hugely unsuccessful and being the actual reason for purchasing Youtube.
  4. After Google became successful (by buying up a competitor), Google has isolated itself from the public completely, with no accessible product forum for complaints. This is consistent with their other products. There is not enough mention of how this has affected the Youtube brand they purchased. Passages on this page may reflect poorly on those who created the original product; therefore, it's important to point out the timeline reasons for the takeover of the product.

--Henrik Erlandsson 00:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

We require third-party sources to make any claims related to these changes. We cannot deduce from disparate information to come to a conclusion. --Masem (t) 03:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Masem 97.94.157.81 (talk) 18:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2023

Change "The company issued special sustainability bonds, 5.75 billion dollars worth, on August 2023." to "The company issued special sustainability bonds, 5.75 billion dollars worth, on August 2020." [1] Source Dated: August 03, 2020 Frenchtoastghost (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done DreamRimmer (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

additional topic, content ideas

Thinking it might be useful to cover some of the behind-the-scenes features, like what content creators can do with videos: schedule previews, enable/disable comments, pinned comments, timestamps in comments, livestream slow mode, limit to subscribers, perhaps of a certain duration, e.g. 5 min., appointing moderators, timeouts, banning, chapters, transcripts, reporting problem comments, blocking other users. Also might be interesting to know what creators, moderators can see about us users. Maybe have some info on monetization for content creators, video demonetization, channel demonetization scandals/drama (most recently Humanist Report). What kind of cut does Google take for Super Chat, Super Sticker, Super Thanks? (IIRC 30% Super Chat) Same for all? Useful superuser feature: sharing URL with video timestamp. More about copyright strike dramas, e.g. high-profile music educator Rick Beato? General creator frustrations with terrible/unresponsive YouTube support on demonetization, copyright-strike, other issues. Doug Grinbergs (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2023

Avaburger40 (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As of 2023, YouTube has over 2.68 billion monthly active users. 52% of internet users worldwide access YouTube at least once a month.

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RudolfRed (talk) 02:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2023