Jump to content

Homosexuality and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bnaur (talk | contribs)
Bnaur (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
[[Image:Slc mormon tempel.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Joseph Smith introduced "the new and everlasting covenant" as a temple marriage.]]
[[Image:Slc mormon tempel.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Joseph Smith introduced "the new and everlasting covenant" as a temple marriage.]]


Since its beginning, the church has always emphasized the importance of heterosexual relationships and marriage. The [[Doctrine and Covenants]] asserts that in order to reach the highest degree of the [[Celestial kingdom]], men and women must enter the everlasting covenant of marriage<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/131 DC 131:1-4]</ref> Although the church allowed men to have sexual relationships with multiple women through its doctrine of [[plural marriage]] (later to be reversed), sexual relationships outside of marriage were always forbidden. [http://en.fairmormon.org/Joseph_Smith%27s_marriages_to_young_women Sexual immorality] was considered in the [[Book of Mormon]] as the “most abominable above all sins save it be the shedding of innocent blood or denying the Holy Ghost.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/39/5 Alma 39:5]</ref> However, the Book of Mormon only refers indirectly as to the [[Sodom_and_Gomorrah|sin of Sodom]] only once.<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/2_ne/13/9 2 Nephi 13:9]</ref>
Since its beginning, the church has always emphasized the importance of heterosexual relationships and marriage. The [[Doctrine and Covenants]] asserts that in order to reach the highest degree of the [[Celestial kingdom]], men and women must enter the everlasting covenant of marriage<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/131 DC 131:1-4]</ref> Although the church allowed men to have sexual relationships with multiple women through its doctrine of [[plural marriage]] (later to be reversed), sexual relationships outside of marriage were always forbidden. [[Teachings_of_Joseph_Smith,_Jr.#Polygamy|Sexual immorality]] was considered in the [[Book of Mormon]] as the “most abominable above all sins save it be the shedding of innocent blood or denying the Holy Ghost.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/39/5 Alma 39:5]</ref> However, the Book of Mormon only refers indirectly as to the [[Sodom_and_Gomorrah|sin of Sodom]] only once.<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/2_ne/13/9 2 Nephi 13:9]</ref>


The [[Bible]], as interpreted by most Christians, [[The Bible and homosexuality|forbade homosexuality]] stating “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/lev/18/22 Leviticus 18:22]</ref> The [[Joseph Smith Translation]] of the Bible further clarifies the Bible's teachings on homosexuality. In the story of Lot, the translation makes clear the intent of the city of Sodom: “Wherefore they said unto the man, We will have the men, and thy daughters also; and we will do with them as seemeth us good. Now this was after the wickedness of Sodom.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/jst/7 JST Genesis 19:11-12]</ref> In regards to 1 Corinthians' condemnation of “abusers of themselves with mankind,” the Joseph Smith Translation reads “All these things are not lawful unto me, and all these things are not expedient. All things are not lawful for me, therefore I will not be brought under the power of any.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_cor/6/12a JST 1 Corinthians 6:12]</ref> [[Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Michael Quinn|Michael Quinn]] has suggested that early church leaders had a more tolerant view of homosexuality, but Gordon B. Hinckley has stated that prophets have always considered homosexuality as a "grievous sin."<ref name="Reverance" />
The [[Bible]], as interpreted by most Christians, [[The Bible and homosexuality|forbade homosexuality]] stating “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/lev/18/22 Leviticus 18:22]</ref> The [[Joseph Smith Translation]] of the Bible further clarifies the Bible's teachings on homosexuality. In the story of Lot, the translation makes clear the intent of the city of Sodom: “Wherefore they said unto the man, We will have the men, and thy daughters also; and we will do with them as seemeth us good. Now this was after the wickedness of Sodom.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/jst/7 JST Genesis 19:11-12]</ref> In regards to 1 Corinthians' condemnation of “abusers of themselves with mankind,” the Joseph Smith Translation reads “All these things are not lawful unto me, and all these things are not expedient. All things are not lawful for me, therefore I will not be brought under the power of any.”<ref>[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_cor/6/12a JST 1 Corinthians 6:12]</ref> [[Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Michael Quinn|Michael Quinn]] has suggested that early church leaders had a more tolerant view of homosexuality, but Gordon B. Hinckley has stated that prophets have always considered homosexuality as a "grievous sin."<ref name="Reverance" />

Revision as of 07:00, 30 December 2008

In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, homosexuality is officially seen as a set of “thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.” The Church recognizes and officially welcomes gay and lesbian members under condition that they attempt to live the church moral code. The Church teaches that homosexual feelings, as distinct from behavior, may sometimes be inborn, [1] and that although these feelings are sometimes unwanted, they can and should be controlled.[2] The Church’s law of chastity forbids extramarital sex, which would include all forms of sexual activity (gay or straight) outside of marriage. Consistently breaking the law of chastity may result in excommunication. Nevertheless, Latter-day Saints who identify themselves as gay or lesbian may remain in good standing in the Church, without ramification, if they abstain from homosexual relations.[2] [3]

In addition to opposing gay and lesbian sex, the church also opposes and campaigns against the extension of marital rights to gay and lesbian families that would, in its opinion, undermine the tradition of heterosexual monogamous marriage (Hinckley, Monson & Faust 2004). The issue of same-sex marriage remains one of the Church’s foremost political concerns.

History and background

Joseph Smith introduced "the new and everlasting covenant" as a temple marriage.

Since its beginning, the church has always emphasized the importance of heterosexual relationships and marriage. The Doctrine and Covenants asserts that in order to reach the highest degree of the Celestial kingdom, men and women must enter the everlasting covenant of marriage[4] Although the church allowed men to have sexual relationships with multiple women through its doctrine of plural marriage (later to be reversed), sexual relationships outside of marriage were always forbidden. Sexual immorality was considered in the Book of Mormon as the “most abominable above all sins save it be the shedding of innocent blood or denying the Holy Ghost.”[5] However, the Book of Mormon only refers indirectly as to the sin of Sodom only once.[6]

The Bible, as interpreted by most Christians, forbade homosexuality stating “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”[7] The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible further clarifies the Bible's teachings on homosexuality. In the story of Lot, the translation makes clear the intent of the city of Sodom: “Wherefore they said unto the man, We will have the men, and thy daughters also; and we will do with them as seemeth us good. Now this was after the wickedness of Sodom.”[8] In regards to 1 Corinthians' condemnation of “abusers of themselves with mankind,” the Joseph Smith Translation reads “All these things are not lawful unto me, and all these things are not expedient. All things are not lawful for me, therefore I will not be brought under the power of any.”[9] Michael Quinn has suggested that early church leaders had a more tolerant view of homosexuality, but Gordon B. Hinckley has stated that prophets have always considered homosexuality as a "grievous sin."[10]

The first church leader to use the term "homosexuality" was J. Reuben Clark in 1952. In an address to the General Relief Society Conference entitled "Home, and the Building of Home Life", he said "the person who teaches or condones the crimes for which Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed - we have coined a softer name for them than came from old; we now speak of homosexuality, which it is tragic to say, is found among both sexes."[11] This is also considered the first time a church leader recognized lesbianism.[12]

Homosexuality as an illness

In 1959, in response to a rash of arrests of gay men in Utah and Idaho, president David O. McKay assigned apostles Spencer W. Kimball and Mark E. Peterson to work on curing gays within the church (Kimball & Kimball 1977, p. 381). At the time, medical experts classified homosexuality as a mental illness, and Kimball was adamant that it could be cured. Speaking to church educators and LDS psychiatrists in 1964, Kimball said, citing a Medical World News article, that "We know such a disease is curable," and that ex-gay Mormons had emerged from the church's counseling programs cured, although the cure was "like the cure for alcoholism subject to continued vigilance" (Kimball 1964, p. 13) harv error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFKimball1964 (help). In 1970, Kimball was involved in creating an LDS publication for church leaders to "assist them to effect a cure and . . . become normal again" (LDS Church 1970, p. 1). The pamphlet teaches that church leaders may assist in this regard by reciting scripture, appealing to their reason, encouraging them to abandon gay lovers and associates, pray, and replace their life with positive action and straight dating (id., 2–6). The pamphlet made it clear that "Homosexuality CAN be cured" (id., 7; Kimball 1971, p. 32).

In 1992, when the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from the International Classification of Diseases as a mental illness,[13] the church produced Understanding and Helping Those With Homosexual Problems,[14] which removed all reference to homosexuality as a disease. The church frequently references contemporary scientific research, but explains that should not be taken as a position on "scientific questions", such as the cause of homosexuality.[2]

Publications

In 1965, Spencer W. Kimball addressed homosexuality in his talk "Love vs Lust." He called it a "heinous" sin, but taught those with homosexual "desires and tendencies" could overcome it "the same as if he had the urge toward petting or fornication or adultery." He taught that although everyone is subject to temptations, "the difference between the reprobate and the worthy person is generally that one yielded and the other resisted."[15] In 1969, he expanded this talk in the Miracle of Forgiveness, in which he teaches that masturbation can lead to homosexuality. However, he views many homosexuals as "basically good people who have become trapped in sin" and that "some totally conquer homosexuality in a few months". Kimball makes clear the book is only his personal opinion and "absolves" the church from any errors in the book.[16]

In 1970, the church produced Hope for Transgressors[17] and in 1971 New Horizons for Homosexuals,[18] both of which advocated a cure for those with homosexual tendencies. Finally that year, the church issued a widely-circulated pamphlet for young men based on a speech by Boyd K. Packer which strongly condemned gay sex. He praised a missionary who was concerned when he had to flatten his companion in order to protect himself from the companion's sexual advances.[19] In 1978, Packer followed this up with another sermon, published as a pamphlet, characterizing homosexual interaction as a perversion and presented the possibility that it had its roots in selfishness and could be cured with "unselfish thoughts, with unselfish acts" (p. 16).[20] He states that the church had not previously talked more about homosexuality because "some matters are best handled very privately" (p. 3) and "we can very foolishly cause things we are trying to prevent by talking too much about them." (p.19)[20]

In October 1995, the Church published an article "Same-Gender Attraction" by Elder Dallin H. Oaks in the October 1995 Ensign magazine.

In April 2007, the Church published an extensive interview with Elders Dallin H. Oaks and Lance B. Wickman to clarify the Church’s stand on homosexuality.

In July 2007, the Church published a booklet entitled God Loveth His Children, which is addressed to Latter-day Saints with same-gender attraction and clarifies the Church's doctrine and policies.

In October 2007, the Church published an article "Helping Those Who Struggle with Same-Gender Attraction" by Elder Jeffrey R. Holland in the October 2007 Ensign magazine.

A summary of the Church position on homosexuality and a listing of all the current Church publications can be found in the Gospel Topics section the Church's Web site LDS.org. Also see a listing of references to homosexuality by leaders of the Church.

The modern church's theology and policy on homosexuality

The modern church's current view on homosexuality was developed beginning in the 1960s, and is largely the result of sermons, discussions, and pamphlets by Spencer W. Kimball, Boyd K. Packer, Gordon B. Hinckley, and Dallin H. Oaks. Some of the church's conclusions are discussed below:

To many members of the church, statements by Gordon B. Hinckley, its late President, are taken as official church policy. A recent statement by Hinckley is as follows: “Now we have gays in the church. Good people. We take no action against such people – provided they don’t become involved in transgression, sexual transgression. If they do, we do with them exactly what we’d do with heterosexuals who transgress.” (Lattin 1997).

The church teaches that homosexual problems can be overcome “through faith in God, sincere repentance, and persistent effort” .[14] "Homosexual relations" is included on the church's list of "serious transgressions" that may result in a disciplinary council and, if the person does not desist, excommunication (LDS Church 1998, p. 95). The church defines "serious transgressions" to include "murder, rape, forcible sexual abuse, spouse abuse, intentional serious physical injury of others, adultery, fornication, homosexual relations, deliberate abandonment of family responsibilities, robbery, burglary, theft, embezzlement, sale of illegal drugs, fraud, perjury, and false swearing." (LDS Church 1998, p. 95).

The existence of lesbian, gay, or bisexual identities

Although there is no official policy to this effect, some church leaders have stated that homosexual, lesbian and gay should be used as adjectives to describe thoughts, feelings or behaviors, and never as nouns to describe conditions or people;[1] [2],[20] although President Gordon Hinckley himself has stated that "we have gays in the church" (Lattin 1997). Those leaders adopting this position state that using these words to denote a condition would imply a person has no choice in regards to sexual behavior.[1] Church leaders and organizations have made reference to homosexuality as a sexual orientation [2][21] but have not talked about bisexuality.

Homosexual problems are defined as homoerotic thoughts, feelings or behaviors .[14] In describing people with homosexual feelings, the church will often say they have same-gender attractions. Marriage is defined as being between a man and a woman. Same-sex marriages are not considered a legitimate form of marriage and the church supports the notion of a constitutional amendment in the USA to legally define marriage as being between a man and a woman.[22]

Homosexual inclinations

The church uses the example of Jesus Christ being tempted as an example of how homosexuals can avoid sin.

The church does not condemn what it calls "susceptibilities", "inclinations" or "temptations" of any type that are not acted upon, pointing to the example of Christ’s temptations.[2] Members with homosexual "inclinations" can participate as all other members of the church[3] and if they remain celibate or heterosexually married, they can participate in the religion to the same extent as straight members. Heterosexual marriage is still considered a sacred covenant which should not be pursued if homosexual feelings are not being controlled.[2] Those with same-gender attractions are encouraged to talk to their ecclesiastical leader.[23][24] They are encouraged not to let their orientation be the sole defining factor in their lives, but to see the whole person, extending their horizons beyond their orientation.[2] They should be careful not to blame their parents.

However, church leaders recognize the possible loneliness and difficulty that those with homosexual inclinations may have and encourage members to reach out to them.[22][10] They have said “All should understand that persons (and their family members) struggling with the burden of same-sex attraction are in special need of the love and encouragement that is a clear responsibility of church members, who have signified by covenant their willingness to bear one another's burden and so fulfill the law of Christ.[1]

The church does not participate in debate on whether homosexual susceptibilities develop from nature or nurture, saying that such debate is better left to science.[2] They have admitted that “perhaps such susceptibilities are inborn or acquired without personal choice” and “may have some relationship to inheritance,” citing some scientific research.[1] However, they teach that these inclinations will not continue beyond death[2] and that gender and gender roles are an eternal and essential characteristic of a soul.[25].

Homosexual feelings

The church teaches that all members should take responsibility in bridling their thoughts, attitudes, feelings, desires and passions. Members are taught to avoid any talk or activity that may arouse sexual feelings.[23] They are taught to “let virtue garnish [their] thoughts unceasingly.”[26] Through the atonement of Jesus Christ, all desire to sin can be changed and individuals can experience lasting peace.[27].

For those with same-gender attractions, they have counseled “the line of prudence is between the susceptibility and the feelings”.[2] The church teaches that everyone has feelings they did not choose,[1] and homosexual feelings can be powerful and difficult to control[3] but “regardless of the causes, these problems can be controlled and eventually overcome”.[14] Even though there is no church discipline for homosexual thoughts or feelings,[1] the church teaches they should learn to accept responsibility for homosexual feelings[14] and cite examples of how those born with inclinations to alcoholism, anger or other undesirable traits have been able to control their thoughts and actions.[2] With better understanding of moral law, they teach these problems will be able to be fixed “routinely”.[20]

Members should not indulge in activities that will intensify homosexual feelings, such as viewing pornography, masturbation, and homosexual behavior.[19][16][14] Unhealthy relationships such as those with people that encourage it should be cut off, and the very appearance of evil should be avoided.[14][20] The bishop should be careful not to create circumstances in which those with homosexual problems are exposed to temptations.[14]

Homosexual behavior

In 1991, the church issued a statement that read

"Sexual relations are proper only between husband and wife appropriately expressed within the bonds of marriage. Any other sexual contact, including fornication, adultery and homosexual and lesbian behavior is sinful...We plead with those involved in such behavior to forsake it".[14]

They further say that it distorts loving relationships,[23] undermines the divinely created institution of the family[22] and can become an addiction.[20] Church discipline for homosexual activity is slightly more onerous than for members involved in heterosexual activity. Gay or lesbian sex will result in an automatic special annotation to a person's permanent membership record.[28] and may permanently bar a person from serving a mission.[29] All prophets, modern and ancient, have taught homosexual behavior is a grievous sin.[10] In 1976, Packer taught that the theory that some are born to be homosexual

“is a malicious and destructive lie. While it is a convincing idea to some, it is of the devil. No one is locked into the kind of life... Boys are to become men – masculine, manly men – ultimately to become husbands and fathers.”[19]

Although church leaders condemn the sin of homosexual behavior, they teach love for the men and women who experience homosexual attraction, including those who pursue some form of homosexual lifestyle.

“We should reach out with kindness and comfort to the afflicted, ministering to their needs and assisting them with their problems.”[10]

They have spoken out against “gay-bashing” or any other physical or verbal attack on those involved in homosexual behavior.[1] They have stated that they find it hard to believe that one would choose such course of deviation by a clear, conscious decision; one leader has suggested that it might be a spiritual disorder, with its roots in selfishness and which feelings must be overcome or suppressed.[20] They teach that the behavior is changeable,[20] and if not repented of, may result in church discipline including excommunication under the inspired direction of the bishop.[14] The cure comes through following the basic rules for moral and spiritual health for a long period of time with undeviating determination.[20]

Mixed-orientation marriage

Homosexuals are discouraged from marriage unless they have overcome homosexual inclinations.

President Hinckley declared

“Marriage should not be viewed as a therapeutic step to solve problems such as homosexual inclinations or practices, which first should clearly be overcome with a firm and fixed determination never to slip to such practices again.”[10]

Unless this is done, they cannot enter marriage in good faith[2] and doing so can damage the lives of others.[14] Church leaders are warned that encouraging members to cultivate heterosexual feelings generally leads to frustration and discouragement.[14] They speak against those who enter into marriage under false pretense.[2] Several marriages have ended because of a failure to end homosexual problems before marriage.[30]

The church maintains that it is possible to overcome these problems.[20] They note that some have reported that heterosexual feelings can emerge once freed from homosexual problems.[14] It would be appropriate for those with homosexual feelings to get married if they

“have shown their ability to deal with these feelings or inclinations and put them in the background, and feel a great attraction for a daughter of God and therefore desire to enter marriage and have children and enjoy the blessings of eternity”.[2]

Several members of the church have dealt with their attractions sufficiently to get married.[31]

Many individuals with same-gender attractions have thought that they should get married because of the church's doctrine of marriage. LDS doctrine holds that heterosexual marriage is one of many requirements for entry into the "highest degree of glory" of the Celestial Kingdom, the highest of the three heavens mentioned by Paul in the New Testament. Marriage between a man and a woman is considered an essential part in the LDS belief of attaining that heaven. Therefore, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe a family is the fundamental unit of society in this life and in heaven. However, this family must come about in the Lord's way, not through deceit or lies.[1] Those who do not have an opportunity to get married in this life will get an opportunity to get married in the next,[32] including those with same-gender attractions.[1] The attractions will not continue past death, and if they were faithful in this life, they will receive every blessing in the eternities, including eternal marriage.[2]

The Women of Worth is an organization that seeks to help those individuals in opposite-gender relationships who's partner struggles with same-gender attractions. According to their website, the members are "determined to have successful marriages -- through faith, healing and understanding".[33]

Political involvement

The Church actively fights against same-sex marriages.

The church usually does not get involved politically, unless there is a moral issue at stake. The church opposes same-sex marriage, but does not object to rights regarding hospitalization and medical care, fair housing and employment rights, or probate rights, so long as these do not infringe on the integrity of the family or the constitutional rights of churches and their adherents to administer and practice their religion free from government interference.[34] In 1976, the church officially opposed the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). According to Church President Spencer W. Kimball, part of the reason for this opposition was to prevent any constitutional recognition for same-sex marriages. In 1980, the Ensign printed a pamphlet which read: "

Passage of the ERA would carry with it the risk of extending constitutional protection to immoral same-sex—lesbian and homosexual—marriages. The argument of a homosexual male, for example, would be: 'If a woman can legally marry a man, then equal treatment demands that I be allowed to do the same.'"[35]

In 1993, Boyd K. Packer called the gay-lesbian movement one of the three areas of danger "where members of the Church, influenced by social and political unrest, are being caught up and led away."[36]

Beginning in the mid-1990s, the church began to focus its attention on the issue of same-sex marriages. In 1993, the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii held that discrimination against same-sex couples in the granting of marriage licenses violated the Hawaiian constitution. In response, the church's First Presidency issued a statement on February 13, 1994 declaring its opposition to same-sex marriage, and urging its members to support efforts to outlaw gay and lesbian marriages. With the assistance of the LDS Church and several other religious organizations, the Hawaiian legislature enacted a bill in 1994 outlawing same-sex marriages. Unofficially, the church continued to oppose efforts in Hawaii to grant gay and lesbian families the right to enter civil unions with most of the same legal rights as heterosexual families, including adoption, child custody, and joint property rights.

As other states, including Vermont and Massachusetts, began extending legal protections to same-sex couples, the church continued to take an active role in preventing any legal recognition for families other than the heterosexual norm. In 2004, the church officially endorsed an amendment to the United States Constitution banning marriage except between a man and a woman. The church also officially announced its opposition to political measures that "confer legal status on any other sexual relationship" than a "man and a woman lawfully wedded as husband and wife." ("First Presidency Statement on Same-Gender Marriage", 19 October 2004). Although the statement was directed specifically to gay marriage, the statement could also be read to encompass political opposition by the Church to recognizing civil unions, common-law marriages, plural marriages, or other family arrangements. Support of an amendment in California has caused Mark Leno to question whether the church's tax-exempt status should be revoked.[37]

The president of the LDS church, President Thomas S. Monson, has stated church members can disagree politically with the church's opposition to same-sex marriage, but if the disagreement turns into an apostasy situation, that would be inappropriate.[38] Prominent church member Harry Reid has supported same-sex marriage and has maintained good standing in the church.

The church also supports the Boy Scouts of America's ban on homosexual conduct. It is the largest sponsor of Boy Scout troops in the United States and has stated that it will end its nine-decade-long affiliation if homosexual conduct is permitted.[39]

Same-sex marriage

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not approve of or permit homosexual behavior within the membership of the church and has actively opposed efforts to legalize same-sex marriage or civil unions.[3][22][40] Gordon B. Hinckley, the late President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has stated that the church does not consider itself "anti-gay" but instead "pro-family."[41] LDS doctrine holds that heterosexual marriage is one of many requirements for entry into the "highest degree of glory" of the Celestial Kingdom, the highest of the three heavens mentioned by Paul in the New Testament.

Marriage between a man and a woman is not only required but is considered an essential part in the LDS belief of attaining that heaven. Therefore, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe a family is the fundamental unit of society in this life and in heaven.

On August 13, 2008, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints released an article further elaborating why they believe gay marriage to be detrimental to society and encouraging church members living in California to use resources necessary in support of Proposition 8.[34] The Church asked its members to participate in the campaign for Proposition 8 on the California ballot, which would define marriage between heterosexual couples. The Church took a great deal of criticism for this action. Regardless, it asked its membership to donate time and money towards the initiative.

BYU

Brigham Young University prohibits homosexual activity

Brigham Young University is the largest religious university in North America, and is the flagship educational institution of the LDS Church. Though its practices and policies are not specifically endorsed by the church, it is viewed by many[who?] to be reflective of the church's mindset.

In order to attend Brigham Young University, students must abide by the Brigham Young University Honor Code, which was recently reworded after several students, including gay and lesbian students, thought that the previous wording was confusing and unclear. Lauren Jackson, a lesbian BYU student, commented "If BYU wants celibate students, it has every right to demand that and to limit behavior, but the issue with the Honor Code is not about lifestyle, it's about identity. Not being allowed to express an identity is very damaging."[42] While both homosexuals and heterosexuals must abide by the church's law of chastity, the Honor Code additionally prohibits all forms of physical intimacy that give expression to homosexual feelings. There is no similarly spelled out restriction against expressing heterosexual feelings, although the Church teaches that intimate heterosexual behaviors such as heavy petting or fornication are unacceptable between unmarried couples. No one may advocate homosexuality or promote homosexual relations as being morally acceptable. It also prohibits cross-dressing. It does make clear, however, that sexual orientation is not an honor code issue.[21]

Several homosexual organizations, including Soulforce, have criticized BYU's Honor Code for its practices.[43][44]

In the 1970s, Brigham Young University conducted a number of experiments in the use of aversion therapy.[45] At the time, homosexuality was considered a mental illness and aversion therapy was one of the more popular methods used to attempt to cure it.[46] In 1966 Martin E.P. Seligman had conducted a study showing positive results, which led to "a great burst of enthusiasm about changing homosexuality [that] swept over the therapeutic community"[47]. In Chapter 3 of Max Ford McBride's dissertation, it states that "seventeen male subjects... were used in the study, 14 completed the treatment.” The participants on the BYU campus were shown pornographic photos of men while being shocked with increasing amounts of voltage. They were then shown heterosexual pornographic images while soothing music was played in the background. One of these was Don Harryman, who shared his experience in Peculiar People: Mormons and Same-Sex Orientation.[48] After Seligman's results were shown to be flawed, aversion therapy fell out of popularity and in 1994, the American Medical Association issued a report that stated "aversion therapy is no longer recommended for gay men and lesbians."[49]

As of 1997, the president of the university (Merrill J. Bateman) was unable to verify electric shock therapies took place at BYU during this time, and requested documentation to support allegations.[50] One faculty member posted a 'question and answer' article on the Brigham Young University website stating that aversion therapy may have taken place at BYU when he was an undergraduate student, but only in rare circumstances.[51]

The church and therapy

When asked the church's position on conversion therapy, Wickman responded “It may be appropriate for that person to seek therapy. Certainly the Church doesn't council against that kind of therapy.” Oaks continued “The Church rarely takes a position on which treatment techniques are appropriate.” They emphasize that the clinical side is not the most important thing, but the recognition that one has their own agency to control what they do. Church leaders caution about abusive practices, such as aversion therapy.[2]

In general, the church discourages against all groups that "challenge religious and moral values", "foster physical contact among participants", or "encourage open confession or disclosure of personal information normally discussed only in confidential settings."[52] They have stated that

"although participants may experience temporary emotional relief or exhilaration, old problems often return, leading to added disappointment and despair."[52]

Several church members have been involved in the therapy of homosexuals. A. Dean Byrd has published several articles in professional magazines and in the Ensign on the subject of homosexuality. Beckstead and Morrow analyzed the experience of 50 Mormon men undergoing conversion therapy.[53]

Jeff Robinson interviewed seven heterosexually married Mormon men who had been through Evergreen and previously identified as gay. They believe they had a spiritual transformation and that their orientation was changed. They were no longer troubled by feeling different or rejected by heterosexual men, emotional attraction to men, sexual attraction to men, feeling bad about same-sex desires, social isolation, or compulsive sexual thoughts and behaviors. Robinson found that their change came from a new understanding that prior same-sex attractions did not require them to be gay.[54]

Homosexual Mormons

There are no official numbers for how many members of the LDS church are attracted to their own gender. The most recent study, conducted in 1972, shows that between 10-13% of college aged Mormon men reported past experimentation with homosexual behavior, which was similar to the percentage of non-Mormon men who reported past experimentation. The study did not include homosexuals who did not have a homosexual experience.[55] Gary Watts, former president of Family Fellowship estimates that only 10% of homosexuals stay in the church.[56] Many of these individuals have come forward through different support groups or websites stating their homosexual attractions and concurrent church membership. A number of personal accounts were published in the book A Place in the Kingdom: Spiritual Insights from Latter-day Saints about Same-Sex Attraction.[57] Other personal experiences are documented on the People Can Change Web site. Others have shared their stories through the Ensign,[58] through the Evergreen website[59] and blogs.[60] The following are some of the more prominent individuals within the gay Mormon community:

  • Michael Glatze was a former gay rights activist and publisher of Young Gay America YGA Magazine.[61] Glatze has since "left homosexuality" and was baptized into the LDS church. He stresses that "Jesus, however, is what, ultimately, changed me."[62]
  • David Matheson admitted to himself that he was attracted to men when he was 22 and married. After seven years of therapy, he says that he has changed his sexual orientation.[63] He has since become a licensed professional counselor and has made his clinical focus to be "helping men who want to diminish unwanted homosexuality and feel whole as men."[64] He is the clinical director of the Center for Gender Wholeness, co-creator of the Journey into Manhood weekend, and a director of People Can Change.[65] He has written the Evergreen Workbook for Men, Four Principles of Growth[66], and has made several media appearances talking about overcoming homosexual attractions. He does not say he is completely straight, but "straight enough".[67]
  • Rich Wyler was excommunicated, but has since rejoined the LDS church.[68] He was married and then widowed. He is the founder and executive director of People Can Change and co-creator and leader of Journey into Manhood. He established Higher Path Life Coaching and began coaching professionally in 2005.[69] He leads telephone-based coaching group called "A Wife's Journey: Caring for Yourself and Your Family When Your Husband Struggles With Homosexuality or Addiction."[70]
  • Erin Eldridge wrote her story of coming out of homosexuality in the book Born that Way?: A True Story of Overcoming Same-Sex Attraction With Insights for Friends, Families, and Leaders published by Deseret Book in 1994. She is now a speaker at Evergreen International conferences and elsewhere.
  • Stuart Matis, a celibate homosexual, stated "Straight members have absolutely no idea what it is like to grow up gay in this church. It is a life of constant torment, self-hatred and internalized homophobia."[74] Stuart later committed suicide at an LDS chapel in Los Altos, California.[75] After two of his gay friends also committed suicide, Affirmation members began to hold suicide vigils around the country to raise awareness about suicide prevention and the destructive consequences of homophobia. Suicide victims are posted on its website.[76] Matis' story is described in the book In Quiet Desperation: Understanding the Challenge of Same-Gender Attraction[77] and was later inspired and created into the play "Missa Solemnis or The Play About Henry"written by non-Mormon playwright Roman Feeser.[78]
  • Ty Mansfield shares his story of dealing with homosexual attractions in the book In Quiet Desperation: Understanding the Challenge of Same-Gender Attraction[79]. He has been a speaker at Evergreen conferences[80] and has been interviewed on several occasions by the media.[81] In 2007 he became the vice President of North Star.[82]

Terminology

Most homosexuals who are sexually active with their own gender do not see a problem with identifying themselves as gay, and do so openly. However, among celibate and faithfully married homosexuals, terminology is more difficult. Many either don't identify their orientation, or say they are heterosexuals.[58] Others identify themselves as gay or homosexual, even if they are heterosexually married.[83] Some people, especially those who are married or have undergone conversion therapy, refer to themselves as being ex-gay or "cured".[citation needed] One relatively new term is Moho, which is a combination of Mormon and homosexual. One homosexual defined a moho to be a homosexual who "is Mormon first and foremost and still trying to live within the constraints of faithful church membership".[84]

Many homosexuals shy away from any classification of their sexuality, following the example of the leaders by speaking only in terms same-sex attraction, which often gets shortened to SSA. However, some oppose the use of same-sex attraction, because "it is not about sex", preferring to use same-gender attraction, or SGA.[85] There is even argument in how to use SSA. Most people say they struggle with SSA, even referring to themselves as "strugglers",[86] but many object to the classification of homosexuality as being a struggle. Solutions have varied from experiencing SSA, having SSA, dealing with SSA, or even being SSA. Most use a combination of terms, and several have expressed frustration for not knowing what to call themselves.[87]

Support organizations

The Church neither encourages nor discourages support groups for those with same gender attractions. However, they do discourage groups that foster homosexual conduct.[2] Even though no organization is officially sponsored by the Church, several organizations have begun who have adopted theories and philosophies they believe are in line with church policy. Several church members have also joined ex-gay organizations. Some church members who identify as LGBT have also joined other support groups that seek changes in church doctrine, and greater church tolerance and awareness regarding LGBT issues. Several support groups are listed below:

  • Evergreen International is an organization for "people who want to diminish same-sex attractions and overcome homosexual behavior."[88] It is the only organization that "sustains the doctrines and standards of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints without reservation or exception."
  • Affirmation: Gay & Lesbian Mormons is a support group originally organized on June 11, 1977 to "work for the understanding and acceptance of gays and lesbians as full, equal and worthy persons within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and society, and to help them realize and affirm self-worth."

[89] However, the group has expanded its mission to include bisexuals, transgender persons, and intersex persons. The group opposes the church's position against homosexuality.

  • North Star is an organization whose mission is to “provide a place of community for Latter-day Saints who experience homosexual attraction, as well as their family, friends, and ecclesiastical leaders.”[90]

The group supports the church’s position on homosexuality and aims to provide spiritual and social support for individuals and families who support and desire to live in harmony with church teachings.

  • Disciples2 is an organization to provide support for what it calls male and female "strugglers", "who have chosen or may someday choose to be in harmony with our Heavenly Father and His laws as set forth by modern-day prophets and apostles".[86]
  • Wildflowers is an organization for "women who have been or who are currently married to homosexual men".[91] The group was organized by Mormons, but is open to all faiths.
  • Family Fellowship is for family members of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and/or Transgender members.[92]
  • GLYA (Gay LDS Young Adults) is a fraternal organization that provides "social activities for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender young adults ages 18-30 who share the similar cultural and religious background and/or heritage in Mormonism".[93] It provides resources for religious organizations that accept homosexual behavior.[94]
  • LDS Reconciliation affirms the spirituality of Gays and Lesbians. It has organized protests against BYU and its policies.[95]
  • Gamofites is an organization of Latter-day Saint gay fathers. In its support for the sexuality of its members, Gamofites dissents from the Church's official doctrine on homosexuality.
  • The Guardrail foundation seeks to "reach out to young men with questions about homosexuality and to provide them with alternatives that are compatible with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." It promotes therapy called Context Specific Therapy that helps with homosexual "problems."[96]

Critics

Homophobia

Scott Thumma and Affirmation.org contend that the LDS church is homophobic.[97][98] Affirmation.org cites a faithful, celibate, gay Latter-day Saint who shortly before his suicide wrote:

"Straight members have absolutely no idea what it is like to grow up gay in this church. It is a life of constant torment, self-hatred and internalized homophobia."[74]

Church leaders have agreed to meet with Affirmation to discuss these concerns.[99]

God Loveth His Children acknowledges homophobia in the church and that many gays "have felt rejected because members of the Church did not always show love." It criticizes those members, and challenges gays to show love and kindness so the members can "change their attitudes and follow Christ more fully."[100]

Elder Packer responded

"We understand why some feel we reject them. That is not true. We do not reject you, only immoral behavior. We cannot reject you, for you are the sons and daughters of God. We will not reject you, because we love you. You may even feel that we do not love you. That also is not true. Parents know, and one day you will know, that there are times when parents and we who lead the Church must extend tough love when failing to teach and to warn and to discipline is to destroy."[101]

A Georgia Tech gay rights manual referred to the church as "anti-gay". After 2 students sued the school for discrimination, a judge ordered that the material be removed.[102]

Westboro Baptist Church

Members of the extremist Westboro Baptist Church have criticized President Hinckley for being too accepting of homosexuals, accusing him of having an "ambiguous voice" about the gay lifestyle rather than taking a firm stand against it. Baptist members protested his alleged weakness against homosexuals at his funeral.[103] When asked why, one woman explained it was because he "preached that God loves all his children, including the gay ones."[104]

Boyd K. Packer and To Young Men Only

Quinn has pointed to Apostle Boyd K. Packer's LDS General Conference address from October 1976 as evidence of problematic attitudes in the LDS Church towards homosexuals. In the speech, Packer encourages teenage boys to avoid immoral activities, which he says includes viewing pornography, masturbating, participating in homosexual behavior, and participating in heterosexual behavior outside of marriage.[105] Packer encourages young Latter-day Saints to "vigorously resist" any males "who entice young men to join them in these immoral acts." Packer cites the example of a male missionary he had known who punched his missionary companion although Packer never states why. Packer says he told the missionary, "Well, thanks. Somebody had to do it, and it wouldn't be well for a General Authority to solve the problem that way."[citation needed] After telling the story, Packer comments, "I am not recommending that course to you, but I am not omitting it. You must protect yourself." Packer offers a similar warning against heterosexual advances, but without the threat of violence in return: "Never let anyone handle you or touch those very personal parts of your body which are an essential link in the ongoing of creation"[106]

Quinn has argued that the obliqueness of these vague comments constitute an endorsement of gay bashing by Packer, and that the church itself endorses such behavior by continuing to publish Packer's speech in pamphlet form.[107] However, in 1995, Apostle Dallin H. Oaks said, "Our doctrines obviously condemn those who engage in so-called 'gay bashing'—(defined as) physical or verbal attacks on persons thought to be involved in homosexual or lesbian behavior".[1]

The historic church

It is unknown to what extent homosexuality was present in early Mormonism. Valeen Avery suggested that Joseph Smith's son, David Hyrum Smith (1844-1904), may have had homosexual tendencies.[108] D. Michael Quinn hypothesized in Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth Century Americans: a Mormon Example that early church leaders had a more tolerant view of homosexuality, and that several early church leaders, including Louise B. Felt, May Anderson, Evan Stephens, and Joseph Fielding Smith (1899-1964), may have either had homosexual tendencies or were involved in homosexual relationships.

Quinn's book states that during the 19th century, the church (like American society as a whole) has been described as relatively tolerant of same-sex intimate relationships, although many such relationships had no sexual component, and among those that did the evidence is usually circumstantial.[109] When gay or lesbian intercourse was discovered, however, the accused were sometimes disfellowshipped or excommunicated, beginning with the first known case in 1841 involving alleged bisexuality by John C. Bennett, although church leader Joseph Smith, Jr. was accused at the time by his brother William of having tolerated Bennett's behavior for a time.[109]

It says that some active and prominent members of the church in Utah were not disciplined after publicizing that they were living in intimate relationships with their same-sex domestic partners, although there is no clear evidence these relationships involved sex.[109] These included Evan Stephens, who had been director of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir until 1916 and is the author of numerous standard church hymns, who remained single but had intimate relationships and shared the same bed with a series of male domestic partners and traveling companions.[110] Some of these relationships where described under a pseudonym in The Children's Friend.[111] Also notable were Louise B. Felt and May Anderson, the church's first two general Primary presidents, who lived together in the same bedroom for decades and were referred to by primary leaders as the David and Jonathan of Primary.[109]

Several LDS scholars have called Quinn's interpretations a distortion of LDS history. They deny any acceptance from previous leaders of homosexuality, and state the current leadership of the church “is entirely consistent with the teachings of past leaders and with the scriptures.”[112] They disagree with Quinn's theory that Evan Stephens was involved in intimate relationships with other men or that the article in The Children's Friend was about these relationships. They state that Stephens "is known only as a strictly moral Christian gentleman".[112] They also note that May originally came to Louise's house at the request of her husband to be with his wife during her illness, but that does not preclude them from thereafter "falling in love" (their words). They argue against any sexual component to their relationship.[112]

Polygamy

Many people have criticized the church's stance on marriage being between a man and a woman, given the church's history with polygamous marriages it conducted in the 19th century. In the 1830s, the religion's founder Joseph Smith, Jr. established a secret form of heterosexual polygamy now referred to as plural marriage. According to Smith's doctrine, a man could marry more than one wife, and still not commit adultery (LDS D&C 132:61). After Smith's death, the plural marriage doctrine was adopted and publicized by his successor Brigham Young in Utah because of the small population at the time and a lack of financial support for many women.[citation needed] This practice was condemned by the United States Congress, with support of the Republican Party and religious leaders who saw polygamy as an affront to the traditional home and family.[113] Congress made polygamy a crime, disincorporated the church, began to seize its financial assets, and imprisoned many of its leaders. Months after a United States Supreme Court decision upholding Congress's efforts to eradicate this type of marriage, the church issued an 1890 Manifesto officially renouncing the practice but not necessarily the doctrine. See plural marriage.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k 1995 Dallin H. Oaks Statement, Official Site of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Retrieved on September 27 2007.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r 1997 Dallin H. Oaks Interview, Official Site of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Retrieved on September 27 2007.
  3. ^ a b c d 1998 Gordon B. Hinckley Talk, Official Site of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Retrieved on September 28 2007.
  4. ^ DC 131:1-4
  5. ^ Alma 39:5
  6. ^ 2 Nephi 13:9
  7. ^ Leviticus 18:22
  8. ^ JST Genesis 19:11-12
  9. ^ JST 1 Corinthians 6:12
  10. ^ a b c d e Hinckley, Gordon B.Reverence and Morality Ensign, May 1987, 45
  11. ^ lark, "Home and the Building of Home Life," Relief Society Magazine 39 (December 1952): pp. 793-4; Conference Reports, October 1954, p. 79
  12. ^ [http://www.modernghana.com/lifestyle/296/16/Lesbianism-now-at-junior-high-school-level-- Lesbianism now at junior high school level
  13. ^ Homosexuality not a disease to be cured. Reproductive Health Matters, November 2004
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m 1992 LDS Church Article, Retrieved on September 28 2007.
  15. ^ Kimball, Spencer W. Love vs. Lust January 5 1965 BYU Speeches of the Year
  16. ^ a b Kimball, Spencer W. (1969) Miracle of Forgiveness
  17. ^ Spencer W. Kimball and Mark E. Petersen Hope for Transgressors 1970
  18. ^ Spencer W. Kimball New Horizons for Homosexuals 1971
  19. ^ a b c Packer, Boyd K. To Young Men Only General Conference Priesthood Session, October 2 1976
  20. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Packer, Boyd K. (1978) To the One
  21. ^ a b BYU Honor Code
  22. ^ a b c d First Presidency Statement on Same-Gender Marriage
  23. ^ a b c Gospel topics, Chasity
  24. ^ Sexual Purity, For the Strength of Youth: Fulfilling Our Duty to God, 26
  25. ^ The Family: A Proclamation to the World The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
  26. ^ Doctrine and Covenants 121:45
  27. ^ Scott, Richard G., (2006), The Atonement Can Secure Your Peace and Happiness
  28. ^ Church Handbook of Instruction (1998), p. 129.
  29. ^ Church Handbook of Instruction (1998), p. 81.
  30. ^ For example, see Debi's Story (from internet archive)
  31. ^ Moore, Carrie A. Gay LDS men detail challenges March 30 2007. Deseret Morning News
  32. ^ Lorenzo Snow, Millennial Star, 31 August 1899, p. 547; discussed in Dallin H. Oaks Pure in Heart (Salt Lake City:Bookcraft, 1988), pp. 61-62
  33. ^ Women of Worth
  34. ^ a b The Divine Institution of Marriage
  35. ^ The Church and the Proposed Equal Rights Amendment: A Moral Issue," Ensign, 10:2, (Feb. 1980), Special 23-page insert, 9
  36. ^ Packer, Boyd K. Talk to the All-Church Coordinating Council May 18, 1993
  37. ^ Moore, Carrie (May 15, 2008). "LDS Church expresses disappointment in California gay marriage decision". Deseret News.
  38. ^ Moore, Carrie A. (February 4, 2008). "Thomas S. Monson named as new LDS Church president". Deseret Morning News. depends on what the disagreement is. If it's an apostasy situation, that would not be appropriate. If it's something political, there is room for opinion here and there on either side.
  39. ^ LDS & BSA/Gays, bsa-discrimination.org, retrieved 2008-01-16 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  40. ^ Jarvik, E. (2006, May 27) LDS to push marriage amendment, Deseret News Retrieved November 20 2006, from
  41. ^ CNN, December 26 2004 Interview, Viewed 2006 November 05.
  42. ^ Walch, Tad (March 22, 2007). "Y. urged to clarify its policy on gays".
  43. ^ Brigham Young University
  44. ^ http://www.brentrasmussen.com/log/node/1454
  45. ^ McBride, Max Ford, Effect of Visual Stimuli in Electric Aversion Therapy. Dissertation presented to the Department of Psychology of Brigham Young University, August 1976. Provo, Utah, 1976.
  46. ^ Aversion Therapy, glptq.com, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  47. ^ p. 156, Seligman, Martin E.P., What You Can Change and What You Can't: The Complete Guide to Self Improvement Knopf, 1993; ISBN 0-679-41024-4
  48. ^ Don D. Harryman, With All Thy Getting, Get Understanding, Affirmation: Gay & Lesbian Mormons, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  49. ^ Health Care Needs of Gay Men and Lesbians in the U.S. American Medical Association Report, 1994
  50. ^ Bateman, Merrill J. Personal communication. (1997, April 9)
  51. ^ "Supershrink" (2006, August 12). Question ID#: 27629. Message posted to http://theboard.byu.edu/?area=viewall&id=27629
  52. ^ a b Church Handbook of Instructions
  53. ^ Beckstead, A. Lee (2004). "Mormon Clients' Experiences of Conversion Therapy". The Counseling Psychologist. 32 (5): 651–690. doi:10.1177/0011000004267555.
  54. ^ Throckmorton, Warren (June 2002). "Initial empirical and clinical findings concerning the change process for ex-gays". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 33 (3). American Psychological Association: 242–248. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.242.
  55. ^ Wilford E. Smith (1976), "Morman Sex Standards on College campusus, or Deal Us Out of the Sexual Revolution!", Dialogue, A Journal of Morman Thought, 10 (2), University of Utah: 76–81, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  56. ^ Rebecca Rosen Lum (August 20, 2007), Mormon church changes stance on homosexuality; New teachings say lifelong celibacy to be rewarded with heterosexuality in heaven, The Oakland Tribune, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  57. ^ A Place in the Kingdom: Spiritual Insights from Latter-day Saints about Same-Sex Attraction
  58. ^ a b For example, see Becoming Whole Again, Compassion for Those Who Struggle and My Battle with Same-Sex Attraction
  59. ^ Evergreen Testimionies
  60. ^ See, for example, Northern Lights, Keep Changing: A Gay Mormon Journey, The Tito Times, Here's to Hope, Original Mohomie, Of Loyal Mind, Changing Countenance, and Mormon Enigma
  61. ^ John Cloud (May 10th 2005). "The Battle Over Gay Teens". Time Magazine. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  62. ^ Kwon, Lillian (July 14, 2007). "Skepticism Over Validity of Ex-Gay Story Prompts 'Confessions'". Christian News.
  63. ^ David Matheson
  64. ^ Center for Gender Wholeness - About Us
  65. ^ Popular Speakers
  66. ^ Four Principles
  67. ^ YouTube - Coqui Zen Entertainment
  68. ^ 17th Annual Evergreen Conference
  69. ^ New Page 1
  70. ^ NW World News Prayer Network: #4680
  71. ^ You Can Overcome Same-sex Attraction by Jason Park
  72. ^ People Can Change - An alternative, healing response to unwanted homosexual desires
  73. ^ Popular Evergreen Conference Speakers
  74. ^ a b Matis, Stuart Letter to a Cousin
  75. ^ Gay Mormon Kills Self on Church Steps
  76. ^ Affirmation: Gay & Lesbian Mormons
  77. ^ In Quiet Desperation: Understanding the Challenge of Same-Gender Attraction, Deseret Book, ISBN 1590383311 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |yeat= ignored (help)
  78. ^ Salinas, Hugo (5 February 2008). "New Play Focuses on Gay Mormon Suicide". Q Salt Lake.
  79. ^ Thirtysomething...: Publications
  80. ^ Popular Evergreen Conference Speakers
  81. ^ Everyday Lives, Everyday Values Interview with Fred and Marilyn Matis and Ty Mansfield, authors of In Quiet Desperation: Understanding the Challenge of Same-Gender Attraction and KSL interview by Carole Mikita with Fred and Marilyn Matis and Ty Mansfield
  82. ^ North Star - Who We Are
  83. ^ A Mormon Enigma An exploration of what it means to be Married, Mormon, and Gay
  84. ^ Keep Changing-A Gay Mormon Journey:Moho
  85. ^ Matis & Mansfield, In Quiet Desperation: Understanding the Challenge of Same-gender Attraction (2004) ISBN 978-1590383315
  86. ^ a b Welcome to Disciples2, disciples2.org, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  87. ^ Am I SSA
  88. ^ Evergreen International
  89. ^ General Charter, Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  90. ^ Northstar
  91. ^ We Are wildflowers, wearewildflowers.com, retrieved 2007-12-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  92. ^ Family Fellowship
  93. ^ Website Disabled
  94. ^ Website Disabled
  95. ^ Gay Mormon at LDSReconciliation.org
  96. ^ The Guardrail Foundation
  97. ^ Thumma, Scott (2004). Gay Religion. RowmanAltamira. pp. 99–113. ISBN 0759103267.
  98. ^ "Affirmation: a Gay and Lesbian Mormon organization". Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  99. ^ Dobner, Jennifer (04/07/2008). "Gay Mormon group to meet with church officials". Salt Lake Tribune. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  100. ^ "[[God Loveth His Children]]". Retrieved 2007-12-07. {{cite web}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  101. ^ Ye Are the Temple of God
  102. ^ "Judge rules Georgia Tech gay rights manual biased". Associated Press. May 1, 2008.
  103. ^ Page, Jared (January 31 2008). "Church group plans protest at Pres. Hinckley's funeral". Deseret Morning News. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  104. ^ Kirby, Robert. "Kirby: My surprise at finding that I belong to a gay church". Salt Lake Tribune.
  105. ^ Boyd K. Packer, To Young Men Only.
  106. ^ Packer, Boyd K. Why Stay Morally Clean New Era July 1972
  107. ^ D. Michael Quinn, "Prelude to the National 'Defense of Marriage' Campaign: Civil Discrimination Against Feared or Despised Minorities", Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 33:3, p. 1-52 (2001).
  108. ^ Valeen Tippetts Avery, From Mission to Madness: Last Son of the Mormon Prophet, (Univ. of Illinois Press, 1998), Chap. 12 "David and Charley", pp. 232-243.
  109. ^ a b c d D. Michael Quinn (2001), Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth Century Americans: a Mormon Example, University of Illinois Press.
  110. ^ D. Michael Quinn (1995), "Male-Male Intimacy among Nineteenth-century Mormons—a Case Study", 28(4) Dialogue 105–28.
  111. ^ Anonymous (Oct. 1919), "Evan Bach [Evan Stephens?]: A True Story for Little Folk, by a Pioneer [Stephens himself?]," 18 The Children's Friend 386.
  112. ^ a b c George L. Mitton, Rhett S. James A Response to D. Michael Quinn's Homosexual Distortion of Latter-day Saint History Review of Same-Sex Dynamics among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example by D. Michael Quinn Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, 1998. Pp. 141–263
  113. ^ Joan Smyth Iversen, "A Debate On the American Home: The Anti-Polygamy Controversy, 1880-1890," Journal of the History of Sexuality 1 (Apr. 1991): 585-602.

Further reading

  • Kimball, Edward L.; Kimball, Andrew E. (1977), Spencer W. Kimball: Twelfth President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft.
  • McBride, Max Ford (August 1976), Effect of Visual Stimuli in Electric Aversion Therapy (Dissertation presented to the Department of Psychology of Brigham Young University), Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Stephens, Evan (anonymously) (October 1919), "Evan Bach [Evan Stephens]: A True Story for Little Folk, by a Pioneer [Stephens himself]", The Children's Friend, vol. 18, p. 386{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link).

Further reading