2001: A Space Odyssey: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Writing: citation requested, haven't seen the full term used except in reference to the film
Line 98: Line 98:
Astronomer [[Carl Sagan]] wrote in his book ''The Cosmic Connection'' that Clarke and Kubrick asked his opinion on how to best depict extraterrestrial intelligence. Sagan, while acknowledging Kubrick's desire to use actors to portray humanoid aliens for convenience's sake, argued that alien life forms were unlikely to bear any resemblance to terrestrial life, and that to do so would introduce "at least an element of falseness" to the film. Sagan proposed that the film suggest, rather than depict, extraterrestrial superintelligence. He attended the premiere and was "pleased to see that I had been of some help." Sagan related that many Soviet scientists regarded the film to be the best American movie they had seen.<ref name="The Cosmic Connection">{{cite book | title = The Cosmic Connection | last = Sagan | first = Carl | publisher = Doubleday & Co. | year = 1973 | location = New York |pages=181–184}}</ref>
Astronomer [[Carl Sagan]] wrote in his book ''The Cosmic Connection'' that Clarke and Kubrick asked his opinion on how to best depict extraterrestrial intelligence. Sagan, while acknowledging Kubrick's desire to use actors to portray humanoid aliens for convenience's sake, argued that alien life forms were unlikely to bear any resemblance to terrestrial life, and that to do so would introduce "at least an element of falseness" to the film. Sagan proposed that the film suggest, rather than depict, extraterrestrial superintelligence. He attended the premiere and was "pleased to see that I had been of some help." Sagan related that many Soviet scientists regarded the film to be the best American movie they had seen.<ref name="The Cosmic Connection">{{cite book | title = The Cosmic Connection | last = Sagan | first = Carl | publisher = Doubleday & Co. | year = 1973 | location = New York |pages=181–184}}</ref>


On February 22, 1965, [[Metro Goldwyn Mayer|MGM]] announced it was backing Kubrick's new science fiction film under the title ''Journey Beyond the Stars''.<ref>Agel (1970): p.1</ref> Interviewed by ''[[The New Yorker]]'' shortly afterwards, Kubrick compared the proposed film to "a space [[Odyssey]]",<ref name="Agel/Bernstein"/> and in April he officially changed the title to ''2001: A Space Odyssey''.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Arthur C. Clarke kept a diary throughout his involvement with ''2001'', excerpts of which were published in 1972 as ''[[The Lost Worlds of 2001]]''. Clarke's diary reveals that by the time backing was secured for ''Journey Beyond the Stars'' in early 1965, the writers still had no firm idea of what would happen to Bowman after the Star Gate sequence, though as early as October 17, 1964 Kubrick had come up with what Clarke called a "wild idea of slightly [[Fagging|fag]] robots who create a [[Victorian era|Victorian]] environment to put our heroes at their ease".<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Initially all of ''Discovery'''s astronauts were to survive the journey; a decision to leave Bowman as the sole survivor and have him regress to infancy was agreed by October 3, 1965.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> The computer [[HAL 9000|HAL]] was originally to have been named "Athena", after the [[Athena|Greek goddess of wisdom]], with a feminine voice and persona.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Clarke noted that, contrary to popular rumor, it was a complete coincidence that each of the letters of HAL's name immediately preceded those of [[IBM]].<ref>Clarke (1972): p.78</ref> The meaning of HAL has been given both as "Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer" and as "Heuristic ALgorithmic computer". The former appears in Clarke's novel of ''2001'' and the latter in his sequel novel ''2010''. Non-fiction reference books on computing more frequently use the first. In formal math, an [[algorithm]] gives an exact answer, whereas a [[heuristic]] gives a well-educated guess.
On February 22, 1965, [[Metro Goldwyn Mayer|MGM]] announced it was backing Kubrick's new science fiction film under the title ''Journey Beyond the Stars''.<ref>Agel (1970): p.1</ref> Interviewed by ''[[The New Yorker]]'' shortly afterwards, Kubrick compared the proposed film to "a space [[Odyssey]]",<ref name="Agel/Bernstein"/> and in April he officially changed the title to ''2001: A Space Odyssey''.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Arthur C. Clarke kept a diary throughout his involvement with ''2001'', excerpts of which were published in 1972 as ''[[The Lost Worlds of 2001]]''. Clarke's diary reveals that by the time backing was secured for ''Journey Beyond the Stars'' in early 1965, the writers still had no firm idea of what would happen to Bowman after the Star Gate sequence, though as early as October 17, 1964 Kubrick had come up with what Clarke called a "wild idea of slightly [[Fagging|fag]] robots who create a [[Victorian era|Victorian]] environment to put our heroes at their ease".<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Initially all of ''Discovery'''s astronauts were to survive the journey; a decision to leave Bowman as the sole survivor and have him regress to infancy was agreed by October 3, 1965.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> The computer [[HAL 9000|HAL]] was originally to have been named "Athena", after the [[Athena|Greek goddess of wisdom]], with a feminine voice and persona.<ref name="Clarke pp.31-38"/> Clarke noted that, contrary to popular rumor, it was a complete coincidence that each of the letters of HAL's name immediately preceded those of [[IBM]].<ref>Clarke (1972): p.78</ref> The meaning of HAL has been given both as "Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer" and as "Heuristic ALgorithmic computer". The former appears in Clarke's novel of ''2001'' and the latter in his sequel novel ''2010''. Non-fiction reference books on computing more frequently use the first{{fact}}. In formal math, an [[algorithm]] gives an exact answer, whereas a [[heuristic]] gives a well-educated guess.


=== Filming ===
=== Filming ===

Revision as of 19:38, 10 August 2009

2001: A Space Odyssey
File:2001Style B.jpg
Original film poster by Robert McCall
Directed byStanley Kubrick
Written byStanley Kubrick
Arthur C. Clarke
Produced byStanley Kubrick
StarringKeir Dullea
Gary Lockwood
William Sylvester
Daniel Richter
Leonard Rossiter
Douglas Rain
CinematographyGeoffrey Unsworth
Edited byRay Lovejoy
Distributed byMetro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Turner Entertainment
Warner Home Video (DVD)
Release dates
April 6, 1968
(United States)
Running time
141 minutes
CountriesUnited Kingdom
United States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$10,500,000
Box office$191,000,000 (Worldwide)

2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 science fiction film directed by Stanley Kubrick and written by Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke. The film deals with thematic elements of human evolution, technology, artificial intelligence, and extraterrestrial life, and is notable for its scientific realism, pioneering special effects, ambiguous and often surreal imagery, sound in place of traditional narrative techniques, and minimal use of dialogue.

Despite receiving mixed reviews upon release, 2001: A Space Odyssey is today recognized by many critics and audiences as one of the greatest films ever made; the 2002 Sight & Sound poll of critics ranked it among the top ten films of all time.[1] It was nominated for four Academy Awards, and received one for visual effects. In 1991, it was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress and selected for preservation in The National Film Registry.

Overview

Title

The first title imagined by Kubrick and Clarke was Journey Beyond the Stars, but Kubrick modified it later.[2] Having the intention to give the film more pomp and grandeur, he used Homer's The Odyssey as inspiration to name the film.[2]

Style

Clarke and Kubrick wrote the novel and screenplay simultaneously, but while Clarke ultimately opted for clearer explanations of the mysterious monolith and the Star Gate, Kubrick chose to keep the film mysterious and enigmatic[3] with minimal dialogue in order to convey what many viewers have described as a powerful sense of the sublime and numinous, without specific explanations of events. For this reason, an encyclopedic plot summary of this film is difficult.

Plot

The title sequence begins with an image of the Earth rising over the Moon, while the Sun rises over the Earth, all in alignment. (This is the first of three occurrences in the film of the iconic "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" theme. See music section for further discussion of the use of music in the film.)

The Dawn of Man

File:Apemen.JPG
Tribal apes approach the mysterious black monolith.

Over images of an African desert, a caption reads "The Dawn of Man." A tribe of herbivorous apes is foraging for food. One of them is attacked and killed by a leopard. They are driven from their water hole by another tribe. Defeated, they sleep overnight in a small exposed rock crater. Waking at sunrise, they find that a black monolith has appeared in front of their shelter. They approach the monolith shrieking and jumping. Soon after that, one of the apes (Daniel Richter) realizes how to use a bone as both a tool and a weapon. The apes can now kill animals and eat meat. The next morning they wrest control of the water hole from the other tribe, killing its leader in the process. Triumphant, the ape leader throws his bone into the air, which switches via match cut from a close-up of the bone to a long shot of an orbital satellite millions of years in the future. This satellite and three more immediately following it are generally identified as orbiting nuclear weapons.[4]

TMA-1

A Pan American space plane flies Dr. Heywood R. Floyd (William Sylvester) to Space Station 5 in an elaborate rendezvous and docking sequence, which include iconic and stylish representations of life on a space station. (See Music) After clearing voice print identification, Floyd makes a videophone call to his daughter (Vivian Kubrick), to wish her a happy birthday. Strolling down the main corridor, he joins a group of Soviet scientists, telling them that he is on his way to Clavius Base, a US base on the moon. One of the scientists, Smyslov (English actor Leonard Rossiter), queries him about what has been going on there, but Floyd declines to answer any more questions when they press him about the rumor that an epidemic has broken out at the US base.

Floyd travels to Clavius in a moon shuttle. There he heads a debriefing session, apologizing for the epidemic cover story. Floyd’s mission is to investigate an artifact dug up on the moon, initially detected by its magnetic signal and named "TMA-1" ("Tycho Magnetic Anomaly One"). Geological evidence shows it was deliberately buried four million years ago. Floyd rides in a Moonbus to the site. In a large pit dug around it, the artifact is a monolith similar to the one encountered by the apes. The visitors examine the monolith and pose for a photo in front of it. As they do, the sun rises over the top of the monolith, which emits an ear-piercing burst of radio waves.

Jupiter Mission

Three of the Discovery One crew are in a state of hibernation in order to conserve life support resources for the voyage.

A title caption reads "Jupiter Mission: Eighteen Months Later." On board the spaceship Discovery One, bound for Jupiter, are two mission pilots, astronauts Dr. David Bowman (Keir Dullea) and Dr. Francis Poole (Gary Lockwood), and three scientists in cryogenic hibernation. Bowman and Poole watch a BBC television story about the mission, in which the TV audience is introduced to the ship’s on-board computer HAL 9000, voiced by Douglas Rain and addressed as "Hal," who runs most of the ship’s operations. BBC newsreader Kenneth Kendall notes that Hal seems to take pride in his work, as if he has genuine emotions. This is followed by another broadcast of a message from Frank’s parents wishing him a happy birthday.

Later, while Dave is showing Hal some sketches of the hibernating astronauts, Hal asks Dave about the air of mystery and secrecy surrounding the mission. Hal then interrupts himself to state that the AE-35 unit, which controls the antenna that provides communications with Earth, is going to fail within 72 hours. Dave takes an excursion outside of the ship in an EVA pod to replace the unit with a spare. Frank and Dave examine the unit but they are unable to find anything wrong with it. They contact Earth-based ground control, and are told that their on-board HAL 9000 computer is in error predicting the fault. This is shocking, since the 9000 series has a perfect operational record.

Hal insists the problem can only be due to "human error." He suggests placing the unit back and waiting for it to fail. On a pretext, Dave and Frank go into one of the EVA pods to talk without Hal overhearing them. Frank says he has “a bad feeling about it.” They decide to follow Hal's suggestion and replace the unit. Frank says that if Hal is proven to be wrong, he will have to be deactivated. Unbeknownst to them, Hal is reading their lips through the window of the spacepod.

Intermission

As Frank attempts to replace the AE-35, his spacepod, controlled by Hal, turns and accelerates towards him, severing his oxygen hose and setting him adrift. Dave goes out in another EVA pod, but without his helmet or gloves, to recover Frank. While Dave is gone, the life functions of the crew in suspended animation are terminated. When Dave returns to the ship, he asks Hal to open the pod bay doors to let him inside. Hal refuses to do so, stating that Dave’s plan to disconnect him jeopardizes the mission. Risking death from anoxia, Dave enters the ship manually through the emergency air lock. In his full spacesuit, Dave makes his way to HAL's LOGIC MEMORY CENTER in order to disconnect Hal. Hal tries to reassure him that everything will be all right, but Dave ignores him.

File:Hal brain room605.JPG
Bowman, in his space suit, enters HAL 9000's Central Core to disconnect his "higher functions."

As Dave disconnects one memory module after another from Hal’s circuitry, Hal continues to protest. Eventually he ends up repeating, “My mind is going.” Hal regresses to his earliest memories, singing the song ("Daisy Bell") his instructor taught him on his first operational day. When Hal is disconnected, a monitor displays a pre-recorded message from Dr. Heywood Floyd:

Good day, gentlemen. This is a prerecorded briefing made prior to your departure and which for security reasons of the highest importance has been known on board during the mission only by your H-A-L 9000 computer. Now that you are in Jupiter's space, and the entire crew is revived, it can be told to you. Eighteen months ago, the first evidence of intelligent life off the Earth was discovered. It was buried forty feet below the lunar surface, near the crater Tycho. Except for a single, very powerful radio emission aimed at Jupiter, the four million year old black monolith has remained completely inert, its origin and purpose still a total mystery.

Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite

The Star-Child into whom Dr. Bowman is transformed, looking at Earth.

A caption reads "Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.” Dave leaves the Jupiter ship in an EVA pod, and encounters another monolith in orbit around Jupiter. Approaching it, he finds himself suddenly traveling through a tunnel of colored light (termed the “Star Gate” in the novel by Clarke) racing at great speed across vast distances of space viewing strange astronomical phenomena, concluding with landscapes with altered colors. He eventually finds himself in a bedroom containing Louis XVI-style decor. He repeatedly sees older versions of himself, with the film's points of view each time switching to the older Dave. Finally an elderly and dying David Bowman is lying on the bed. At its foot a monolith appears. It transforms him into a fetus-like being enclosed in a transparent orb of light (termed the “Star-Child” in the novel by Clarke). The final shot shows the “Star-Child” floating in space next to the Earth.

Cast

File:David Bowman.jpg
Keir Dullea as Dave Bowman

Production

Writing

Shortly after completing Dr. Strangelove (1964), Stanley Kubrick became fascinated by the possibility of extraterrestrial life,[5] and determined to make "the proverbial good science fiction movie".[6] Searching for a suitable collaborator in the science fiction community, Kubrick was advised to seek out Arthur C. Clarke by a mutual acquaintance, Columbia Pictures staffer Roger Caras. Although convinced that Clarke was "a recluse, a nut who lives in a tree", Kubrick agreed that Caras would cable the Ceylon-based author with the film proposal. Clarke's cabled response stated that he was "frightfully interested in working with enfant terrible", and added "what makes Kubrick think I'm a recluse?"[7]

In early conversations, Kubrick and Clarke jokingly called their project How the Solar System Was Won, an allusion to the 1962 Cinerama epic How the West Was Won.[8] Like that film, Kubrick's production would be divided into distinct episodes. Clarke considered adapting a number of his earlier stories before selecting "The Sentinel", a 'first-contact' story he had published in 1950, as the starting point for the film. The collaborators originally planned to develop a novel first, free of the constraints of a normal script, and then to write the screenplay; they envisaged that the final writing credits would be "Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, based on a novel by Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick", to reflect their preeminence in their respective fields.[9] However, in practice the cinematic ideas required for the screenplay developed parallel to the novel, with cross-fertilisation between the two. In the end, the screenplay credits were shared while the novel, released shortly after the film, was attributed to Clarke alone, but Clarke wrote later that "the nearest approximation to the complicated truth" is that the screenplay should be credited to "Kubrick and Clarke" and the novel to "Clarke and Kubrick".[10]

Astronomer Carl Sagan wrote in his book The Cosmic Connection that Clarke and Kubrick asked his opinion on how to best depict extraterrestrial intelligence. Sagan, while acknowledging Kubrick's desire to use actors to portray humanoid aliens for convenience's sake, argued that alien life forms were unlikely to bear any resemblance to terrestrial life, and that to do so would introduce "at least an element of falseness" to the film. Sagan proposed that the film suggest, rather than depict, extraterrestrial superintelligence. He attended the premiere and was "pleased to see that I had been of some help." Sagan related that many Soviet scientists regarded the film to be the best American movie they had seen.[11]

On February 22, 1965, MGM announced it was backing Kubrick's new science fiction film under the title Journey Beyond the Stars.[12] Interviewed by The New Yorker shortly afterwards, Kubrick compared the proposed film to "a space Odyssey",[9] and in April he officially changed the title to 2001: A Space Odyssey.[10] Arthur C. Clarke kept a diary throughout his involvement with 2001, excerpts of which were published in 1972 as The Lost Worlds of 2001. Clarke's diary reveals that by the time backing was secured for Journey Beyond the Stars in early 1965, the writers still had no firm idea of what would happen to Bowman after the Star Gate sequence, though as early as October 17, 1964 Kubrick had come up with what Clarke called a "wild idea of slightly fag robots who create a Victorian environment to put our heroes at their ease".[10] Initially all of Discovery's astronauts were to survive the journey; a decision to leave Bowman as the sole survivor and have him regress to infancy was agreed by October 3, 1965.[10] The computer HAL was originally to have been named "Athena", after the Greek goddess of wisdom, with a feminine voice and persona.[10] Clarke noted that, contrary to popular rumor, it was a complete coincidence that each of the letters of HAL's name immediately preceded those of IBM.[13] The meaning of HAL has been given both as "Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer" and as "Heuristic ALgorithmic computer". The former appears in Clarke's novel of 2001 and the latter in his sequel novel 2010. Non-fiction reference books on computing more frequently use the first[citation needed]. In formal math, an algorithm gives an exact answer, whereas a heuristic gives a well-educated guess.

Filming

Filming of 2001 began December 29, 1965, in Shepperton Studios, Shepperton, England. The studio was chosen because it could house the 60'x 120'x 60' pit for the Tycho crater excavation scene, the first to be shot.[14] From 1966, filming was at MGM-British Studios in Borehamwood, from where the production was run to facilitate special effects filming; it was described as a "huge throbbing nerve center… with much the same frenetic atmosphere as a Cape Kennedy blockhouse during the final stages of Countdown."[15]

The film was planned to be photographed in 3-film-strip Cinerama (like How the West Was Won), but was changed to Super Panavision 70 (which uses a single-strip 65 mm negative) on the advice of special photographic effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull, due to distortion problems with the 3-strip system.[citation needed] Color processing and 35 mm release prints were done using Technicolor's dye transfer process. The 70 mm prints were made by MGM Laboratories, Inc. on Metrocolor. In March 1968, Kubrick finished editing the film, making his final cuts just before the film's general release in April 1968. The production was $4.5 million over the initial $6.0 million budget, and sixteen months behind schedule.[14]

Special effects

Director of Photography Geoffrey Unsworth did not want the film to be complicated with printing effects such as blue screen, so most of the special effects were done as in-camera effects.

This film pioneered retroreflective matting (front projection) in mainstream movie production. The technique was selected to produce the backdrops for the African scenes where apes learn to use tools, as traditional techniques using backdrops or back-projection did not produce a realistic looking result. Existing techniques that used painted backdrops for stills or back-projection for moving scenes simply proved not to be capable of producing the realistic effects Kubrick demanded. The technique was also used for a number of shots during the spacecraft scenes, notably to produce the images seen through windows. The technique has been used widely in the film industry since 2001 pioneered its use, although starting in the 1990s it has been increasingly replaced by green screen systems.

Front projection uses a separate scenery projector arranged at right angles to the camera. A half-silvered mirror splits the light coming out of the projector, with about half of it reflected forward where it falls onto a retroflective backdrop. The image is then reflected back to the camera, along with the normal lighting from the scene. The projected landscape is invisible on the actors because it is much dimmer than the scene illumination, and is only visible in the camera because of the high reflectivity of the background retroflective screen.

Front projection had been used in smaller settings before 2001, but mostly for still-action photography or television production, using small still images and projectors. The expansive backdrops in the African scenes required a backdrop 40 feet tall, far larger than had ever been used before. Using the largest existing projectors based on 4 by 5 inch transparencies resulted in grainy images when projected that large, so the 2001 team worked with MGM's Special Effects Supervisor, Tom Howard, to build a custom projector using 8 by 10 slides and the largest water-cooled arc lamp available. When the reflective material was applied to the backdrop, they discovered roll-to-roll variations that led to obvious visual artifacts, a problem that was solved by tearing the material into small chunks and applying it in a "camouflage" pattern.[16]

Space travel shots were also handled in-camera. The model of the Discovery One spacecraft was moved along a track, mechanically linked to the camera. On the first pass, the model was unlit, masking the star-field. The model and film were returned to the start position, and on the second pass, the model was lit. For the third pass, motion pictures were projected onto front-projection screens in the model's windows, showing the interior of the ship. The result was a film negative that was as sharp as live footage.

For interior shots inside the spacecraft, which was shown to contain a giant centrifuge whose rotation was intended to produce artificial gravitation, Kubrick had a 30-ton rotating "ferris wheel" built by Vickers-Armstrong Engineering Group at a cost of $750,000. The set was 38 feet in diameter and 10 feet wide.[17] Various spacecraft interior shots, mostly in the Discovery, were shot by placing the set within the wheel, then rotating it while the actor walked in sync with its motion, leaving them at the bottom of the wheel. The camera could be fixed to show the actor walking "up" the set, or mounted to rotate with the actor, as in the famous jogging scene. The number of shots where the actors appear separated in the wheel are limited, because they required one of the actors to be strapped into place while the wheel moved to allow the other to walk at the bottom. The most notable case is just before Dave and Frank eat while watching the BBC special, which required Gary Lockwood to be strapped into a seat while Keir Dullea walked toward him from the opposite side of the wheel.

Veteran technicians of previous science fiction films were puzzled by how realistic the effects of floating in space were when Dave or Frank are outside the Discovery, and the weightless scenes inside the spacecraft such as the scene with the disconnection of Hal. These were accomplished by having actors suspended from a ceiling (as was then common in simulating spacewalking) with the camera underneath them pointing straight up, thus eliminating the common effect of a notable up-down pull on an astronaut. The actors's bodies blocked the camera's view of the suspension wires, creating a very believable appearance of floating.

The "Star Gate" sequence, one of many ground-breaking visual effects.

The colored lights in the Star Gate sequence were accomplished by slit-scan photography of moving images of paintings. The shots of various nebula-like phenomena were colored paints and chemicals in a tank of water, a device known formally as a cloud tank, in a dark room.

During filming, the scene of the expanding star field, possibly intended to be reminiscent of an expanding universe after the "Big Bang", was called The Manhattan Project.

Detailed instructions in relatively small print for various technological devices appear at several points in the film, of which the most notable is the lengthy instructions for the zero-gravity toilet. Similar detailed instructions for explosive bolts also appear.

An important article by Douglas Trumbull about the creation of special effects for 2001 appears in the June 1968 issue of American Cinematographer.[18]

Deleted scenes

File:2001 school class deleted scene.jpg
Painting school class scene, deleted from the film.

Kubrick filmed several scenes that were deleted from the final film. These include a schoolroom on the moon base; Floyd buying a bush baby from a department store, via videophone, for his daughter; additional space walks; and astronaut Bowman retrieving a spare part from an octagonal corridor. The most notable cut was a 10-minute black-and-white opening sequence featuring interviews with actual scientists, including Freeman Dyson,[19] discussing extraterrestrial life, which Kubrick removed after an early screening for MGM executives.[20] If the music intro and outro are included, 29 minutes of film have been excised from the theatrical version.[21]

Release

The film's world premiere was on April 2, 1968, at the Uptown Theater in Washington, D.C.. Kubrick deleted 19 minutes from the film just before the film's general release on April 6, 1968.[22][23] It was released in 70mm format, with a six-track stereo magnetic soundtrack, and projected in the 2.21:1 aspect ratio. The film's general release took place in autumn 1968, in 35mm anamorphic format, with either a four-track magnetic stereo soundtrack or an optical monaural soundtrack.

The original 70 mm release, like many Super Panavision 70 films of the era such as Grand Prix, was advertised as being in Cinerama in cinemas equipped with special projection optics and a deeply curved screen. In standard cinemas, the film was identified as a 70 mm production. The original release of 2001: A Space Odyssey in 70 mm Cinerama with six-track sound (via Klipschorn- and Odyssey-model cinema speakers) played continually for two years in The Glendale Theater, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, a feat cited by Arthur C. Clarke in the non-fiction book The Lost Worlds of 2001.[23]

MGM also published letterbox laserdisc editions (including an updated edition with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound). There also was a special edition laserdisc from The Criterion Collection in the CAV format. In 1999, it was re-released in VHS, and in 2001 as part of the "Stanley Kubrick Collection" in both VHS and DVD formats with remastered sound and picture.

It has been released on Region 1 DVD four times: once by MGM Home Entertainment in 1998 and thrice by Warner Home Video in 1999, 2001, and 2007. The MGM release had a booklet, the film, trailer, and an interview with Arthur C. Clarke, and the soundtrack was remastered in 5.1 surround sound. The 1999 Warner Bros. release omitted the booklet, yet had a re-release trailer. The 2001 release contained the re-release trailer, the film in the original 2.21:1 aspect ratio, digitally re-mastered from the original 70 mm print, and the soundtrack remixed in 5.1 surround sound. A limited edition DVD included a booklet, 70 mm^ frame, and a new soundtrack CD of the film's actual (unreleased) music tracks, and a sampling of HAL's dialogue.

Warner Home Video released a 2-DVD Special Edition on October 23, 2007 as part of their latest set of Kubrick reissues. The DVD was released on its own and as part of a revised Stanley Kubrick box set which contains new Special Edition versions of A Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Eyes Wide Shut, Full Metal Jacket, and the documentary A Life in Pictures. Additionally, the film was released in high definition on both HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc. The Imdb.com listing of this DVD and the official Warner Brothers webpage[24] have a complete listing of all the special features but both omit a documentary entitled "What is Out There?" featuring interviews with Keir Dullea and Arthur C. Clarke.

Reaction

Upon release, 2001 polarized critical opinion, receiving both ecstatic praise and vehemently negative criticism. Some critics viewed the original 160-minute cut shown at premieres in Washington, New York and Los Angeles,[22] while others saw the 19 minutes shorter general release version that was in theaters from April 6, 1968 onwards. In The New Yorker, Penelope Gilliatt said it was "some kind of great film, and an unforgettable endeavor…The film is hypnotically entertaining, and it is funny without once being gaggy, but it is also rather harrowing."[25] Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times opined that it was "the picture that science fiction fans of every age and in every corner of the world have prayed (sometimes forlornly) that the industry might some day give them. It is an ultimate statement of the science fiction film, an awesome realization of the spatial future…it is a milestone, a landmark for a spacemark, in the art of film."[26] Louise Sweeney of The Christian Science Monitor felt that 2001 was "a brilliant intergalactic satire on modern technology. It's also a dazzling 160-minute tour on the Kubrick filmship through the universe out there beyond our earth."[27] Philip French wrote that the film was "perhaps the first multi-million-dollar supercolossal movie since D.W. Griffith's Intolerance fifty years ago which can be regarded as the work of one man…Space Odyssey is important as the high-water mark of science-fiction movie making, or at least of the genre's futuristic branch."[28] The Boston Globe's review indicated that it was "the world's most extraordinary film. Nothing like it has ever been shown in Boston before or, for that matter, anywhere…The film is as exciting as the discovery of a new dimension in life."[29] Roger Ebert gave the film four stars in his original review, believing the film "succeeds magnificently on a cosmic scale."[30] He later put it on his Top 10 list for Sight & Sound.[31] Time provided at least seven different mini-reviews of the film in various issues in 1968, each one slightly more positive than the preceding one; in the final review dated December 27, 1968, the magazine called 2001 "an epic film about the history and future of mankind, brilliantly directed by Stanley Kubrick. The special effects are mindblowing."[32]

However, Pauline Kael said it was "a monumentally unimaginative movie,"[33] and Stanley Kauffmann of The New Republic called it "a film that is so dull, it even dulls our interest in the technical ingenuity for the sake of which Kubrick has allowed it to become dull."[34] Renata Adler of The New York Times wrote that it was "somewhere between hypnotic and immensely boring."[35] Variety's 'Robe' believed the film was a "Big, beautiful, but plodding sci-fi epic…A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, 2001 lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark."[36] Andrew Sarris called it "one of the grimmest films I have ever seen in my life…2001 is a disaster because it is much too abstract to make its abstract points."[37] (Sarris reversed his opinion upon a second viewing of the film, and declared "2001 is indeed a major work by a major artist."[38]) John Simon felt it was "a regrettable failure, although not a total one. This film is fascinating when it concentrates on apes or machines…and dreadful when it deals with the in-betweens: humans...2001, for all its lively visual and mechanical spectacle, is a kind of space-Spartacus and, more pretentious still, a shaggy God story."[39]. It has been noted that its slow pacing often alienates modern audiences more than it did upon its initial release. [40]

2001 earned Stanley Kubrick an Academy Award for Best Visual Effects and was nominated for Best Art Direction, Best Director (Kubrick), and Original Screenplay (Kubrick, Clarke).

Awards and honors

Academy Awards

Award[41] Person
Best Visual Effects Stanley Kubrick
Nominated:
Best Original Screenplay Stanley Kubrick
Arthur C. Clarke
Best Art Direction Anthony Masters
Harry Lange
Ernest Archer
Best Director Stanley Kubrick

Other awards

Won
Nominated

Top film lists

2001 was number 22 on AFI's 100 Years… 100 Movies, was named number 40 on its 100 Years, 100 Thrills, included on its 100 Years, 100 Quotes ("Open the pod bay doors, Hal."), HAL 9000 is the #13 villain in the AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains, is the only science fiction film to make the Sight & Sound poll for ten best movies, and tops the Online Film Critics Society list of "greatest science fiction films of all time."[42] In 1991, this film was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress and selected for preservation in their National Film Registry. Other lists that include the film are 50 Films to See Before You Die (#6), The Village Voice 100 Best Films of the 20th Century (#11), the Sight & Sound Top Ten poll (#6),[43] and Roger Ebert's Top Ten (1968) (#2). In 1995, the Vatican named it as one of the 45 best films ever made (and included it in a sub-list of the "Top Ten Art Movies" of all time.)[44]

American Film Institute recognition

More recently, 2001 was named number one by the American Film Institute on their 10 Top 10 special in the Science Fiction category.

The film made number 8 on Clarke's own List of the best Science-Fiction films of all time, following The Day the Earth Stood Still at #7.

Interpretation

Since its premiere, 2001: A Space Odyssey has been analyzed and interpreted by multitudes of people ranging from professional movie critics to amateur writers and science fiction fans. Kubrick encouraged people to explore their own interpretations of the film, and refused to offer an explanation of "what really happened" in the movie, preferring instead to let audiences embrace their own ideas and theories. In a 1968 interview with Playboy magazine, Kubrick stated:

You're free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film — and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level — but I don't want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he's missed the point.[45]

Scientific accuracy

File:Discovery1b.JPG
Spaceship Discovery One launching an EVA pod. Note the deliberately non-aerodynamic design of both craft. In space, aerodynamics do not matter.[46]

The primary technical adviser for 2001: A Space Odyssey was Marshall Spaceflight Center engineer Frederick I. Ordway III.[47] (Detailed design information is given by Ordway in the American Astronautical Society History Series.[48][49] .) 2001 is highly realistic when compared with other science fiction films, particularly its predecessors. It accurately presents outer space as transmitting no sound. Its portrayal of microgravitation in spaceships and outer space is notable. Tracking shots inside the rotating wheel providing artificial gravity contrast with the "weightlessness" outside the wheel during the repair and Hal disconnection scenes. (The pod bay walking scenes of the astronauts may be explained by the earlier scenes where stewardesses walk in zero gravity using velcro-equipped shoes labelled Grip Shoes.)

Much was made by MGM's publicity department of the film's realism, claiming in a 1968 brochure that "Everything in 2001: A Space Odyssey can happen within the next three decades, and…most of the picture will happen by the beginning of the next millennium."[50] This has proved to be wrong, although some of the film's predictions (see following) have indeed been realized.

The film is scientifically inaccurate in minor details, many explained by the technical difficulty inherent to producing a realistic effect.

The appearance of outer space is problematic both in terms of lighting and the alignment of astronomical bodies. With no atmosphere in outer space, stars do not twinkle, and light does not spread out to become ambient. The side of the Discovery spacecraft unlit by the sun would be virtually pitch-black, nor would the stars appear to move in relationship to Discovery as it traveled towards Jupiter. Proportionally, the sun, moon, and earth would not visually line up at the size ratios as shown in the opening shot. Nor would the moons of Jupiter in the shot just before Bowman enters the Star Gate. (In fact, due to the perfect Laplace resonance of the orbits of the 4 large moons of Jupiter, the first three will never align, and the third moon Ganymede will always be exactly 90 degrees further around the planet whenever the two inmost moons are in perfect alignment.) Finally, the edge of the Earth seems sharp in the movie, but it should be slightly blurry due to the scattering of the sunlight by the atmosphere, as we can see in many photos taken from space today.

The entire sequence in which Dave Bowman re-enters Discovery through the emergency airlock has problems. Bowman apparently holds his breath just before ejecting from the pod into the airlock. Before exposure to a vacuum, NASA states, one must exhale, because holding in the breath would rupture the lungs.[51] On the DVD edition of the film released in 2007, Arthur C. Clarke states in an interview that had he been on the set the day they filmed this, he would have caught this error. Also, the blown pod hatch simply vanishes while concealed behind a puff of smoke.[52] At least open to question is why the EVA pod does not fly away when Dave Bowman uses explosive bolts. It may have used station keeping attitude jets, as is common with communications satellites today, but there is no indication of this occurring. Finally, being in outer space environment without a proper suit would have exposed him to −270.15 °C temperature which he would have been unlikely to survive.

While the film's portrayal of reduced or zero gravity is unusually realistic, problems remain. The craft that lands on the moon has no artificial gravity- yet during flight when one of the officials offers coffee, he begins to pour it from a standard coffee pot, and liquid food slips down the straw when Dr. Floyd stops sucking. When spacecraft land on the Moon, dust is incorrectly shown billowing as it would in an atmosphere, not the vacuum of the Lunar surface.[52] While on the moon, all actors move as if in normal Earth gravity, not the 1/6 G of the moon. Similarly, the behavior of Dave and Frank in the pod bay is not fully consistent with zero-Gs, as it should be since the pod bay is not in a centrifuge. The astronauts could be wearing magnetic boots, but their leaning on the table when they try to diagnose the AE-35 unit is especially peculiar. Finally, in an environment with a radius as small as the main quarters, the simulated gravity would vary enormously from the center of the crew quarters to the 'floor', even varying between feet, waist, and head. Nor is the RPM of the crew quarters fast enough to generate anything close to earth gravity.

The first two appearances of the monolith, one on the Earth and one on the moon, conclude with the sun rising over the top of the monolith at the zenith of the sky. While this could happen in an African veldt anywhere between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn, it could not happen anywhere near the crater Tycho (where the monolith is found) as it is 45 degrees south of the lunar equator.

Earlier in the film, while en route to the space station, Dr. Floyd's pen floats out of his pocket, to be retrieved by the stewardess. The pen moves in a circular arc (actually stuck to the edge of a rotating plastic disc), but it would either rotate around its own center of gravity (rather than a point external to it) or would move in a straight line unless the plane is rotating.

There are other problems that might be more appropriately described as continuity errors, such as which side of Earth is lighted when viewed from Clavius, and the time lag of the position readout on the PanAm plane's monitors.

Imagining the future

File:2001-centerfuge.jpg
The Centrifuge in Discovery One—Exercising astronaut Frank Poole jogs its circumference.
File:2001interview.jpg
Small, portable, flat-screen devices were indeed available in the year 2001.

The film shows an imagined version of the year 2001.

One futuristic device already in use when the film was released in 1968 was voice-print identification, used in some police departments. A credible prototype of a chess-playing computer already existed, even though it could be defeated by experts. Computers did not defeat champions until the late 1980s. While 10-digit phone numbers for long-distance national dialing originated in 1951, longer phone numbers for international dialing became a reality in 1970. Personal in-flight entertainment displays were first introduced in the 1980s strictly for the purpose of playing video games, but then broadened out for the purpose of TV broadcast and movies as shown in the film. The film also shows flat-screen TV monitors, of which the first real-world prototype appeared in 1975. Plane cockpit integrated system displays, known as glass cockpits, were introduced in 1979. Even rudimentary voice-controlled computing now exists, although it is still not as sophisticated as depicted in the film.

In terms of corporate realities, many more BBC stations exist now than did in 1968 as shown in the film (although there is not yet a BBC 12), and the corporations IBM, Aeroflot, Howard Johnsons, and Hilton Hotels, all of which appear in the film, still exist. On the other hand, the film depicts a still existing Pan Am and still autonomous Bell System telephone company. Pan Am declared bankruptcy in 1991. The Bell System logo seen in the film was modified in 1969 and dropped entirely in 1983.[53] Political realities are also quite different. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is alive and well in the film, but in fact was transformed into the Commonwealth of Independent States in 1991.

Technologies which are portrayed as common in the film, but are not, include commonplace space travel, space stations with hotels, moon colonization, suspended animation of humans, common (non-mobile) videophones, and strong artificial intelligence of the kind displayed by HAL.

Soundtrack

Music

Music plays a crucial part in 2001, and not only because of the relatively sparse dialogue. From very early on in production, Kubrick decided that he wanted the film to be a primarily non-verbal experience,[54] one that did not rely on the traditional techniques of narrative cinema, and in which music would play a vital role in evoking particular moods. About half the music in the film appears either before the first line of dialogue or after the final line.

The film is remarkable for its innovative use of classical music taken from existing commercial recordings. Most feature films then and now are typically accompanied by elaborate film scores or songs written especially for them by professional composers. In the early stages of production, Kubrick had actually commissioned a score for 2001 from noted Hollywood composer Alex North, who had written the score for Spartacus and also worked on Dr. Strangelove.[55] However, on 2001 Kubrick did much of the filming and editing using, as his guides, the classical recordings which eventually became the music track. In March 1966, MGM became concerned about 2001's progress and Kubrick put together a show reel of footage to the ad hoc soundtrack of classical recordings. The studio bosses were delighted with the results and Kubrick decided to use these 'guide pieces' as the final musical soundtrack, and he abandoned North's score. Kubrick failed to inform North that his music had not been used and, to his dismay, North did not discover this until he saw the movie just prior to its release.[56] What survives of North's soundtrack recordings has been released as a "limited edition" CD from Intrada Records. All the music North originally wrote was recorded commercially by North's friend and colleague Jerry Goldsmith with the National Philharmonic Orchestra and was released on Varese Sarabande CDs shortly after Telarc's first theme release but before North's death.

In an interview with Michel Ciment, Kubrick explained:

However good our best film composers may be, they are not a Beethoven, a Mozart or a Brahms. Why use music which is less good when there is such a multitude of great orchestral music available from the past and from our own time? When you are editing a film, it's very helpful to be able to try out different pieces of music to see how they work with the scene…Well, with a little more care and thought, these temporary tracks can become the final score.[57]

2001 is particularly remembered for using Johann Strauss II's best-known waltz, An der schönen blauen Donau (On The Beautiful Blue Danube), during the extended space-station docking and lunar landing sequences, and the use of the opening from Richard Strauss's Also sprach Zarathustra ("Thus Spake[58] Zarathustra"), which has now become firmly associated with the film and its themes.[59] The film also introduced the modernistic composer György Ligeti to a wide public.

The Richard and Johann Strauss pieces and Ligeti’s Requiem (the Kyrie section) act as recurring leitmotifs in the film’s storyline. Richard Strauss' Also Sprach Zarathustra is first heard in the opening title which juxtaposes the sun, earth, and moon. It is subsequently heard when an ape first learns to use a tool, and when Bowman is transformed into the Star-Child at the end of the film. Zarathustra thus acts as a bookend for the beginning and end of the film, and as a motif signifying evolutionary transformations, first from ape to man, then from man to Star-Child. This piece was originally inspired by the philosopher Nietzsche’s book of the same name which alludes briefly to the relationship of ape to man and man to Superman. The Blue Danube appears in two intricate and extended space travel sequences as well as the closing credits. The first of these is the particularly famous sequence of the PanAm space plane docking at Space Station V. Ligeti’s Requiem is heard three times, all of them during appearances of the monolith. The first is its encounter with apes just prior to the Zarathustra-accompanied ape discovery of the tool. The second is the monolith's discovery on the Moon, and the third is Bowman's approach to it around Jupiter just before he enters the Star Gate. This last sequence with the Requiem has much more movement in it than the first two, and it transitions directly into the music from Ligeti’s Atmosphères which is heard when Bowman actually enters the Star Gate. No music is heard during the monolith's much briefer final appearance in Dave Bowman’s celestial bedroom which immediately precedes the Zarathustra-accompanied transformation of Bowman into the Star-Child. A shorter excerpt from Atmospheres is heard during the pre-credits prelude and film intermission, which are not in all copies of the film. (Gayane's Adagio) from Aram Khachaturian's Gayaneh ballet suite is heard during the sections that introduce Bowman and Poole aboard the Discovery conveying a somewhat lonely and mournful quality. Other music used is Ligeti’s Lux Aeterna and an electronically altered form of his Aventures, the last of which was so used without Ligeti's permission.[60]

Also sprach Zarathustra has been widely used in many other contexts since 2001 made it well known. This includes a disco version by Eumir Deodato which was used in the film Being There, and its use as the ring entrance music for now-retired pro wrestler Ric Flair. It was also used as Elvis Presley's stage entrance music in the late years of his career[61], as well as used by Rush as the introduction for their shows during the 1997 "Test For Echo" tour. Finally, it was used by the BBC as the introductory theme music for their television coverage of the Apollo space missions.

HAL's haunting version of the popular song "Daisy Bell" (referred to by HAL as "Daisy" in the film) was inspired by a computer-synthesized arrangement by Max Mathews, which Arthur C. Clarke had heard in 1962 at the Bell Laboratories Murray Hill facility when he was, coincidentally, visiting friend and colleague John Pierce. At that time, a speech synthesis demonstration was being performed by physicist John Larry Kelly, Jr, by using an IBM 704 computer to synthesize speech. Kelly's voice recorder synthesizer vocoder recreated the song "Daisy Bell" ("Bicycle Built For Two"), with Max Mathews providing the musical accompaniment. Arthur C. Clarke was so impressed that he later used it in the screenplay and novel.[62]

"Daisy" did not survive in many foreign language versions of the film. In the French soundtrack to 2001, HAL sings the French folk song "Au Clair de la Lune" while being disconnected. In the German version, HAL sings the children's song "Hänschen Klein" ("Johnny Little") and in the Italian version HAL sings "Giro giro tondo."

Soundtrack album

The initial MGM soundtrack album release contained none of the material from the altered and uncredited rendition of "Aventures", used a different recording of "Also Sprach Zarathustra" than that heard in the film, and a longer excerpt of "Lux Aeterna" than that in the film. In 1996, Turner Entertainment released a new soundtrack on CD which included the material from "Aventures" and restored the version of "Zarathustra" used in the film, and used the shorter version of "Lux Aeterna" from the film. As additional "bonus tracks" at the end, this CD includes the versions of "Zarathustra" and "Lux Aeterna" on the old MGM soundtrack, an unaltered performance of "Aventures", and a 9-minute compilation of all of Hal's dialogue from the film.

According to the Internet Movie Database,[63]

The end music credits do not list a conductor and orchestra for "Also Sprach Zarathustra." Stanley Kubrick wanted the Herbert von Karajan / Vienna Philharmonic version on English Decca for the film's soundtrack, but Decca executives did not want their recording "cheapened" by association with the movie, and so gave permission on the condition that the conductor and orchestra were not named. After the movie's successful release, Decca tried to rectify its blunder by re-releasing the recording with an "As Heard in 2001" flag printed on the album cover. John Culshaw recounts the incident in "Putting the Record Straight" (1981)... In the meantime, MGM released the "official soundtrack" L.P. with Karl Böhm's Berlin Philharmonic "Also Sprach Zarathustra" discretely substituting for von Karajan's version.

Alex North's unused original score for the film has twice been released on compact disc. In 1993, a re-recording of North's score, with Jerry Goldsmith conducting the National Philharmonic Orchestra, was issued by Varèse Sarabande Records. In 2008, the original score recordings, which survived only in monaural form, were released on CD by Intrada Records.

Dialogue

Alongside its use of music, the dialogue (or lack thereof) in 2001 is another notable feature. The relative absence of dialogue and conventional narrative cues has baffled many viewers. A particularly striking feature of the film is the complete absence of dialogue for the entirety of both the first and last 20 minutes or so of the film; the total narrative of these sections, totaling almost 45 minutes, is carried by images, actions, sound effects, a great deal of music (See Music) and two title cards.

Only when the film moves into the postulated future of 2000 and 2001, do we encounter characters who speak. By the time shooting began, Kubrick had deliberately jettisoned much of the intended dialogue and narration,[64] and what remains is notable for its apparently banal nature, while it is juxtaposed with spectacularly beautiful scenes of space. The first scenes of dialogue are Floyd's three encounters on the space station. They are preceded by the spectacular space docking sequence choreographed to Strauss's The Blue Danube waltz and followed by a second extended sequence of his travel to the moon with more Strauss, the two sequences acting as bookends to his space-station stopover. In the stopover itself, we get idle chit-chat with the colleague who greets him followed by Floyd's slightly more affectionate phone call to his daughter, and the distantly friendly but awkwardly strained encounter with Soviet scientists. Later, en route to the monolith, Floyd engages in trite exchanges with his staff while we see a spectacular journey by Earthlight across the moon's surface. Generally, the most memorable—and arguably most human—dialogue in the film belongs to the computer Hal and Hal's exchanges with David Bowman. Hal is the only character in the film who openly expresses anxiety (primarily around his disconnection), as well as feelings of pride and bewilderment.

The first line of dialogue is the space-station stewardess addressing Heywood Floyd saying "Here you are, sir. Main level D." The final line is Floyd's conclusion of the pre-recorded Jupiter mission briefing about the monolith. "Except for a single, very powerful radio emission, aimed at Jupiter, the four-million-year-old black monolith has remained completely inert, its origin—and purpose—still a total mystery."

Sequels and adaptations

Kubrick did not envisage a sequel to 2001, fearing the later exploitation and recycling of his material in other productions (as was done with the props from MGM's Forbidden Planet). To the dismay of MGM Studios, he ordered all prints of unused scenes, sets, props, miniatures, and production blueprints destroyed. Most of these materials were lost, with several notable exceptions. Several sources suggest that a 79-inch model of the spaceship Discovery One was salvaged and appeared in modified form in Space 1999 but this is untrue; a similar spaceship model appears in the series in the episode "Alpha Child" but this was a modified Discovery replica built by one of the series' model-makers and not one from 2001. However, a 2001 spacesuit backpack did appear in another Gerry Anderson series and can be seen in the "Close Up" episode of UFO.[5][65][66][67][68] One of Hal's eyepieces is in the possession of the author of HAL's Legacy, David G. Stork.

Clarke went on to write three sequel novels: 2010: Odyssey Two (1982), 2061: Odyssey Three (1987), and 3001: The Final Odyssey (1997). 3001: The Final Odyssey reconnects with Frank Poole, who has been found drifting by a ship that was looking for frozen water near the edge of the solar system. Sufficiently preserved by the vacuum of space, he is revived by the advanced medical technology of the time and becomes the novel's protagonist.

The only filmed sequel, 2010, was based on Clarke's 1982 novel and was released in 1984. Kubrick was not involved in the production of this film, which was directed by Peter Hyams in a straightforward style with more dialogue. Clarke saw it as a fitting adaptation of his novel,[69] and had a brief cameo appearance in the film. As Kubrick had ordered all models and blueprints from 2001 destroyed, Hyams was forced to recreate these models from scratch for 2010. Hyams also claimed that he would not make the film had he not received both Kubrick's and Clarke's blessings.[citation needed] There has been no discussion of filmmakers adapting the other two for the screen, although actor Tom Hanks has expressed interest in possible adaptations of 2061 and 3001.[70]

Beginning in 1976, Marvel Comics published both a Jack Kirby-written and drawn comic adaptation of the film and a Kirby-created 10-issue monthly series "expanding" on the ideas of the film and novel.

Parodies and homages

2001 has been frequently parodied, sometimes extensively and other times briefly. Parodies employ both its music and iconic imagery.

Extended parodies would include the following

  • In 2002, the Futurama episode "Love and Rocket" parodied numerous plot elements concerning the 2001 Jupiter mission and the HAL 9000. Planet Express Ship's on-board A.I. is replaced. The A.I. panel design, the general plot, and numerous details track the 2001 Jupiter mission plot. Planet Express Ship attempts to kill its crew; there is a sequence where the crew confers about the ship's A.I. in an enclosed glass chamber; "Daisy Bell" is in the soundtrack; and several references occur during the A.I. shutdown sequence near the end. [Another Futurama episode refers to "HAL's Institute for Criminally Insane Robots".]
  • The 1978 film Laserblast was featured on the Season 7 finale of the TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000 (MST3K). After the crew of the "Satellite of Love" become pure energy and light and wander off to play on the edge of the universe, Dr. Forrester (Trace Beaulieu) is taken through various later ages by a Monolith size VHS tape labeled "The Worst Movie Ever Made", and he becomes a Star-Child, encased in a glowing embryonic-sac. Ominous vocals similar to the "Lux Aeterna" Monolith-music are also featured, produced by Kevin Murphy of MST3K.
    Similarly, MST3k parodied the film several times, again notably during the film Mitchell in which Joel Robinson departs, and Mike Nelson takes his place. As Dr. Forrester and Tv's Frank are discussing manners of doing away with the newly hired temp Mike, their lips are shown in close up, with frequent cuts back to Gypsy's eye close up, mimicking the scene of HAL reading the lips of the two astronauts. The opening of the movie parodies the first scene aboard the Discovery.

Parodies of the dawn of man sequence include:

  • A Monty Python's Flying Circus episode features an ape touching a mysterious red line, then thinking (visualized as a light bulb over his head) before getting a bone from nearby animal skeleton, smashing it and throwing the bone high into space. The bone blends into a satellite, which finally crashes onto the ape.
  • The 2008 video game Spore contains a sequence activated if a player's species achieves sentience. In it the creature smashes a stick and throws it in the air, set to Also Sprach Zarathustra. The music is interrupted when the stick comes back down and hits the creature on the head.
  • The 1972 comedy The Groove Tube opens with humanoids discovering a TV (in place of a monolith).

Parodies focused on the monolith include:

  • In the 2005 film Charlie and the Chocolate Factory there is a scene where they visit the TV Room and the TV is playing 2001. When Willy Wonka sends the chocolate bar through TV, the chocolate bar appears where the rectangle that apes admire was. The main title for 2001 is also played in this scene.
  • Sesame Workshop has referenced to 2001 in several places, notably in a Square One Television sketch featuring a talking computer similar to HAL 9000 which taught the concept of infinity and in an episode of Sesame Street featured two white monoliths, resembling a giant number "11" appearing in front of Telly to an interpretation of "Also Sprach Zarathustra". Perhaps the most well known of Sesame Workshop's references to 2001 are a series of animated cartoon spoofs from The Electric Company, called the "Monolith" cartoons, featuring the opening movement of "Also Sprach Zarathustra" (followed by an infinite sound loop of tympani thumping) and a white monolith, that would break up and crumble down revealing some letter dipthong or a small word, subsequently pronounced by a deistic voice; i.e. "ee", "oo", "ow", "all", "alk", "was", etc. (Two such cartoons, "me" and "amor" were made for Sesame Street.)
  • An internet based video series called "Yu-Gi-Oh the Abridged Series" also parodies 2001, with a monolith covered in Duel Monsters cards singing "Daisy, Daisy" and stating "This is a 2001 parody, by the way".
  • The Nickelodeon animated series The Angry Beavers parodied 2001 in the episode "Mission to the Big Hot Thingy", using The Blue Danube and showing a monolith floating through space as the Beavers build a dam to keep from spiralling into the sun.

Parodies of HAL include:

  • The 2008 film WALL-E has an artificial intelligence autopilot robot named Auto with an eye similar to that of HAL 9000. The music Also Sprach Zarathustra is used in a pivotal sequence when a ship's captain who (like all humans in the film) is obese and has severe bone loss manages to stand up and stop Auto from taking over the spaceship.
  • In 2001, South Park satirized the final disconnect of HAL 9000 in season 4, episode 13. The episode titled "Trapper Keeper" has Kyle going into the Trapper Keeper to perform the disconnect before it destroys the world.
  • The nature and design of the computer "Ariia" (sic) in the 2008 film Eagle Eye is an homage to HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Its final disconnect is also accomplished by a character named Bowman. The Ariia supercomputer has a red eye like HALs, takes actions against humanity based on a draconian interpretation of its programming, and detects plots against it by lip-reading.
  • A December 2008 Jared commercial has "Dave"'s GPS computer asking to see the jewelry he has just purchased, and when he insists that the machine just provide driving instructions, it replies "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that" and locks the car's doors
  • The 2005 film Robots (film) includes a reference to 2001. When Mr. Bigweld gets hit in the head and loses his memory, he starts singing the song "Daisy Bell," which is the same song that Hal starts to sing as his memory is removed.
  • The Bionic Woman two-part story "Doomsday Is Tomorrow" has Jaime Sommers confronting a honey-voiced, artificial intelligence nemesis called Alex 7000 which is clearly modeled on HAL 9000.
  • In the animated series Duckman episode "Gripes of Wrath", a supercomputer is overloading from paradoxical comments made by Duckman, and begins to sing "Daisy, Daisy" as does Hal when David Bowman is disconnecting him.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Sight and Sound: Top Ten Poll 2002". British Film Institute web site. Retrieved 2006-12-15. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  2. ^ a b Template:Pt "2001 e a Odisséia Humana". Ensay about the film by Fernando César Pereira da Costa. Visited on 05/30/09 . Accessed 2009-05-30. Archived 2009-06-01.
  3. ^ [1]
  4. ^ According to the audio commentary by actors Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood on the October 2007 DVD of 2001: A Space Odyssey, this and immediately following satellites are indeed nuclear weapon platforms. They are also identified as nuclear weapons in Jerome Agel's "The Making of Kubrick's 2001" and in the more recent 2000 book The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Modern Library Movies) by Stephanie Schwam, Jay Cocks. See p. 237-8 of latter. In high resolution, the flags of multiple countries are visible on the various platforms. The international nuclear logo also appears on one.
  5. ^ a b Agel, Jerome (1970). The Making of Kubrick's 2001. New York: Signet. p. 11. ISBN 0-451-07139-5.
  6. ^ Clarke, Arthur C. (1972). The Lost Worlds of 2001. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. p. 17. ISBN 0-283-97903-8.
  7. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1997, 1998). Stanley Kubrick. London: Faber and Faber. pp. 156–257. ISBN 0-571-19393-5. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  8. ^ Arthur Clarke's 2001 diary, excerpted from Lost Worlds of 2001 by Arthur C. Clarke. Retrieved October 7, 2006.
  9. ^ a b Agel (1970): pp. 24–25
  10. ^ a b c d e Clarke (1972): pp.31–38
  11. ^ Sagan, Carl (1973). The Cosmic Connection. New York: Doubleday & Co. pp. 181–184.
  12. ^ Agel (1970): p.1
  13. ^ Clarke (1972): p.78
  14. ^ a b Gedult, Carolyn. The Production: A Calendar. Reproduced in: Castle, Alison (Editor). The Stanley Kubrick Archives, Taschen, 2005. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1
  15. ^ Lightman, Herb A. Filming 2001: A Space Odyssey. American Cinematographer, June 1968. Excerpted in: Castle, Alison (Editor). The Stanley Kubrick Archives, Taschen, 2005. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1
  16. ^ Herb A. Lightman, "Front Projection for '2001: A Space Odyssey'", American Cinematographer
  17. ^ George D. DeMet, The Special Effects of "2001: A Space Odyssey", DFX, July 1999
  18. ^ Douglas Trumbull (1968). "Creating Special Effects for 2001". American Cinematographer. 49 (6): 412–413, 420–422, 416–419, 441–447, 451–454, 459–461. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. ^ Freeman Dyson, Disturbing the Universe, 1979, pg 189-191, ISBN 0330263242
  20. ^ Agel, Jerome (1970). The Making of Kubrick's 2001. Signet. p. 27. ISBN 0-451-07139-5.
  21. ^ "2001 A Space Oddysey - Alternate Versions".
  22. ^ a b Agel, Jerome (1970). The Making of Kubrick's 2001. Signet. p. 363. ISBN 0-451-07139-5.
  23. ^ a b Clarke, Arthur C. (1972). The Lost Worlds of 2001. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-283-97903-8.
  24. ^ http://kubrickfilms.warnerbros.com
  25. ^ Gilliatt, Penelope. "After Man", review of 2001 reprinted from The New Yorker in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  26. ^ Champlin, Charles. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Los Angeles Times in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  27. ^ Sweeney, Louise. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Christian Science Monitor in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  28. ^ French, Philip. Review of 2001 reprinted from an unnamed publication in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  29. ^ Adams, Marjorie. Review of 2001 reprinted from The Boston Globe in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  30. ^ Roger Ebert, Reviews: 2001: A Space Odyssey, 1968. Retrieved from
    http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19680412/REVIEWS/804120301/1023
  31. ^ Nick James; et al. "BFI | Sight & Sound | Top Ten Poll 2002 - How the directors and critics voted". Archived from the original on 2009-07-29. Retrieved 2009-07-27. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ Unknown reviewer. Capsule review of 2001 reprinted from Time in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  33. ^ "Critical Debates: 2001: A Space Odyssey". rogerebert.com. Retrieved 2006-09-26.
  34. ^ Stanley Kauffmann, "Lost in the Stars," The New Republic. Retrieved from http://www.krusch.com/kubrick/Q16.html
  35. ^ Adler, Renata. Review of 2001 reprinted from The New York Times in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  36. ^ Review of 2001 by 'Robe'. April 1, 1968
  37. ^ Sarris, Andrew. Review of 2001 review quoted from a WBAI radio broadcast in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  38. ^ "Hail the Conquering Hero". FilmComment.com. Retrieved 2007-01-12.
  39. ^ Simon, John. Review of 2001 reprinted from The New Leader in Jerome Agel's The Making of Kubrick's 2001, Signet Books, 1970. ISBN 0-45107-139-5
  40. ^ [2]
  41. ^ "NY Times: 2001: A Space Odyssey". NY Times. Retrieved 2008-12-27.
  42. ^ ""2001: A Space Odyssey Named the Greatest Sci-Fi Film of All Time By the Online Film Critics Society"". Online Film Critics Society. Retrieved 2006-12-15.
  43. ^ "Sight & Sound: Top Ten Poll 2002". British Film Institute web site. Retrieved 2006-12-15. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  44. ^ "USCCB – (Film and Broadcasting) – Vatican Best Films List". USCCB web site. Retrieved 2007-04-22. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  45. ^ Norden, Eric. Interview: Stanley Kubrick. Playboy (September 1968). Reprinted in: Phillips, Gene D. (Editor). Stanley Kubrick: Interviews. University Press of Mississippi, 2001. ISBN 1-57806-297-7 pp. 47–48
  46. ^ See p. 355 of Spacecraft Technology: The Early Years by Mark Williamson and The Kubrick Site [3]
  47. ^ F.I.Ordway (1970). "2001: A Space Odyssey, Spaceflight". Spaceflight. 12. British Interplanetary Society: 110–117. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  48. ^ Ordway, F.I. (1982). "Part B: 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY IN RETROSPECT". In Eugene M. Emme (ed.). American Astronautical Society History Series SCIENCE FICTION AND SPACE FUTURES: PAST AND PRESENT. Vol. 5. pp. 47–105. ISBN 0-87703-172-X. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  49. ^ Ordway, F.I. (2007). "2001: A Space Odyssey - Vision Versus Reality at 30". In Kerrie Dougherty (ed.). American Astronautical Society History Series: History or Rocketry and Astronautics. Vol. 27. pp. 3–17. ISBN 978-0-87703-535-0. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  50. ^ MGM Studios. Facts for Editorial Reference, 1968. Reproduced in: Castle, Alison (Editor). The Stanley Kubrick Archives, Taschen, 2005. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1
  51. ^ "Human Body In a Vacuum". Imagine the Universe!: Ask An Astrophysicist. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center web site. Retrieved 2007-08-13.
  52. ^ a b The Kubrick Site: 2001 Gaffes & Glitches
  53. ^ On a small to medium TV screen or computer monitor the penultimate and final Bell logo look very much alike. On the massive scale of a movie screen, one can clearly see that the Bell logo in the film still has the letters "Bell system" embedded which were dropped from the logo the year after the release of the film.
  54. ^ "New Titles – The Stanley Kubrick Archives – Facts". Retrieved 2007-02-05.
  55. ^ Time Warp – CD Booklet – Telarc Release# CD-80106
  56. ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1998). Stanley Kubrick. London: Faber and Faber. p. 308. ISBN 0571193935.
  57. ^ "Kubrick on Barry Lyndon: An interview with Michel Ciment". Retrieved 2006-07-08.
  58. ^ Oddly listed in the closing credits as spoke Zarathustra but on the official soundtrack albums as spake Zarathustra. The book by Nietzsche has been translated both ways and the title of Strauss's music is usually rendered in the original German whenever not discussed in the context of 2001. Although Britannica Online's entry lists the piece as spoke Zarathustra, music encyclopedias usually go with 'spake'. Overall, 'spake' is more common mentioning the Strauss music and 'spoke' more common mentioning the book by Nietzsche.
  59. ^ It is possible that the music from "Also Sprach Zarathustra" indirectly inspired some of the crucial scenes, as discussed here. In 1965 the BBC-TV documentary The Epic That Never Was had effectively used the iconic Strauss opening interspersed with ghostly dialog from the unfinished I, Claudius (film).
  60. ^ "György Ligeti—music scores used in '2001' film (obituary)". Retrieved 2006-06-13.
  61. ^ See Understanding Elvis By Susan Doll p. 170
  62. ^ "Bell Labs: Where "HAL" First Spoke". (Bell Labs Speech Synthesis web site). Retrieved 2007-08-13.
  63. ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/trivia
  64. ^ "Trivia for 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)". IMDb. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
  65. ^ Mark Stetson (model shop supervisor) (1984). 2010: The Odyssey Continues (DVD). ZM Productions/MGM. Retrieved 2007-08-31.
  66. ^ "Starship Modeler: Modeling 2001 and 2010 Spacecraft". 2005-10-19. Retrieved 2006-09-26.
  67. ^ Bizony, Piers (2001). 2001 Filming the Future. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 1-85410-706-2.
  68. ^ Bentley, Chris (2008). The Complete Gerry Anderson: The Authorised Episode Guide (4th edition). London: Reynolds and Hearn. ISBN 978-1-905287-74-1.
  69. ^ STARLOG magazine
  70. ^ "3001: The Final Odyssey" on Yahoo! Movies

References

  • Agel, Jerome (1970). The Making of Kubrick's 2001. Signet. ISBN 0-451-07139-5.
  • Bizony, Piers (2001). 2001 Filming the Future. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 1-85410-706-2.
  • Castle, Alison (ed.), ed. (2005). "Part 2: The Creative Process / 2001: A Space Odyssey". The Stanley Kubrick Archives. New York: Taschen. ISBN 3-8228-2284-1. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)
  • Chion, Michel (2001). Kubrick's Cinema Odyssey. translated by Claudia Gorbman. London: British Film Institute. ISBN 0-85170-840-4. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |other= ignored (|others= suggested) (help)
  • Clarke, Arthur C. (1972). The Lost Worlds of 2001. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-283-97903-8.
  • Kolker, Robert (ed.), ed. (2006). Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-517453-4. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)
  • Richter, Daniel (2002). Moonwatcher's Memoir: A Diary of 2001: A Space Odyssey. foreword by Arthur C. Clarke. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-7867-1073-X.
  • Schwam, Stephanie (ed.), ed. (2000). The Making of 2001: A Space Odyssey. New York: Modern Library. ISBN 0-375-75528-4. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |other= ignored (|others= suggested) (help)
  • Wheat, Leonard F. (2000). Kubrick's 2001: A Triple Allegory. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0-8108-3796-X.

Further reading

External links