Jump to content

User talk:SL93: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Green (programming language): keep discussions about afd off of my talk page (not meant rudely)
Line 458: Line 458:
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#May 15 2010|May 15, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Recast]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201005/Recast quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#May 15 2010|May 15, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Recast]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201005/Recast quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} Thanks from me and the wiki [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 18:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
}} Thanks from me and the wiki [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 18:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

== Green (programming language) ==

You should be aware that [[Green (programming language)|Green]] is a historically important programming language from 1977. We have a small amount of coverage on it in [[Timeline of programming languages#1970s]] which should help you find some additional references. Also, as you probably saw from [[Talk:AXFS]], [[AXFS]] is widely used in embedded devices and despite currently being a tiny stub article, a very important filesystem. --[[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 14:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
:You're welcome to bring it up at the AfD. Personally, my opinions are quite different from yours. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill#top|talk]]) 14:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
::I have absolutely no interest in the AfD battleground. I'm simply bringing it to ''your'' attention because you nominated the articles for AfD. --[[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 14:55, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:56, 16 May 2010

DYK for Campanula isophylla

Updated DYK query On February 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Campanula isophylla, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waterstalk 06:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amanita strobiliformis

Updated DYK query On February 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amanita strobiliformis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clavaria pyxidata

Updated DYK query On February 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clavaria pyxidata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Suillus tomentosus

Updated DYK query On February 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Suillus tomentosus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

User page protected for a week.

As you no doubt have noticed, it is being frequently targetted by a block evader. A rangeblock was attempted yesterday, but it seems not to have stopped them, thus reprotecting your page. Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. I have had my user pages vandalized, but not by one that writes in Engrish. I consider that a Red badge of courage. Bearian (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images for Clavaria pyxidata article

Hello Joe Chill. Thank you for your interesting article. I noticed that it didn't have any visual representation to compliment the text. Randomly searching the Internet, I believe I've found some free information with several pictures old enough to be in the public domain. Please take a look at this book: Project Gutenberg's The Mushroom, Edible and Otherwise, by M. E. Hard. With a search for Clavaria pyxidata you can find the specific photograph. Images can be tagged with {{PD-Gutenberg}}.

I hope that you can extract useful information from the page. Please answer here if you have any further comments. Thanks. --173.52.244.51 (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK re WB Field Hse

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Eagle4000's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK question for Lonicera nitida

Hello! Your submission of Lonicera nitida at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular T · C 20:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Typhaea stercorea

Updated DYK query On February 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhaea stercorea, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Get Paper

I noticed that you voted to delete the I Get Paper page, it is played frequently on the major radio station Hot103 which I think gives it certain notability. Please consider changing your vote. 206.45.0.225 (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bình Ngô đại cáo

Updated DYK query On 16 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bình Ngô đại cáo, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just spotted this and wondered if you were going to submit it to DYK? I'll try and find some scholarly refs to it if you do. Smartse (talk) 22:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I checked the main DYK page but not there. I've added a couple of extra references, there isn't much out there unfortunately. Smartse (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Simon J. Hall

Updated DYK query On 17 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Simon J. Hall, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wesley Brown Field House

Updated DYK query On 18 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wesley Brown Field House, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nerine bowdenii

Updated DYK query On February 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nerine bowdenii, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edward Moon

Updated DYK query On 19 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Edward Moon, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Holy Lola

Updated DYK query On February 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Holy Lola, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lonicera nitida

Updated DYK query On February 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lonicera nitida, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

possible GA eventually...

Laetiporus sulphureus is a fungus about which enough is known that it could be a not-too-hard GA, if you wanna take it that way. Sasata and I can help buff it up quite a bit. Now I am curious about trying to eat one....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mushrooms for sale in Mexico

I came across some interesting mushrooms during the rainy season in central Mexico (Mexico and Hidalgo states near Mexico City) for sale on the street. You seem to know your fungus. If you get a chance, care to look at these pics in commons to identify? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MushTaxco.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ShroomsSaleVCarbon.JPG Thelmadatter (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Russula integra

Updated DYK query On February 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Russula integra, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 06:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Famous

You have become famous in Russia [1]. Pcap ping 13:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cortinarius archeri

Updated DYK query On February 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cortinarius archeri, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Armillaria gallica

Updated DYK query On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Armillaria gallica, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Yongyoot Thongkongtoon

Updated DYK query On 26 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yongyoot Thongkongtoon, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Questionable Stropharia

Updated DYK query On February 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Questionable Stropharia, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Adventures of Harry Richmond

Updated DYK query On 28 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Adventures of Harry Richmond, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe Chill. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 14, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 February 28#Simple Instant Messenger. Cunard (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joe. I've restored this article with proper references. I'm letting you know, since you've participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Agee. If you want to renominate the article for further consideration, please do so. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Galerina marginata

Updated DYK query On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Galerina marginata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henry Bracy

Updated DYK query On 28 February, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Bracy, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Coreopsis verticillata

Updated DYK query On March 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Coreopsis verticillata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Laetiporus sulphureus

Updated DYK query On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laetiporus sulphureus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pellia epiphylla

Updated DYK query On 6 March, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pellia epiphylla, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ActionsScript Foundry page deletion

Hello, ActionScript Foundry must not be deleted. It is not an advertisement for the company. It is just the description for the Open Source project like Maven, Archiva, Ant and other does and like other ActionScript 3 framework like Cairngorm. In plus the project is hosted at source-forge. Thank you very much please do not delete this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionart (talkcontribs) 09:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on quality control policies

As part of a project funded by the European Commission (QLectives), we are collecting and analysing data to study quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies in Wikipedia. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey.

The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at this URL. Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to get in touch.

Thanks for your help! --DarTar (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently participated in discussion at an AFD for a broadcast station. I have recently posted the above topic on the talk page of the notability guideline for organizations and companies, to see if there is interest in adding language related to the notability of radio and TV broadcast stations to that guideline. Your input would be most welcome. Thanks. Edison (talk) 01:59, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note on my talk page

I'm now officially totally confused. As far as I can tell, you neither wrote that article nor participated in the AfD discussion thereof. Are you saying that you are Jon Agee, and that you believe I knew that? Please explain. All I was doing was making a good-faith nomination of a book that did not seem to me to meet the standards of WP:BOOK. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I seldom nominate something like that with an accusatory tone, unless it's obvious spam (which this was not). I was merely annoyed by the excessive use of pull quotes, normally a feature of advertisements, not encyclopedia articles. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review Big data CFD

You voted on the delete debate for the original entry Big data that was rm by admins. Please reenter the debate? jk (talk) 04:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back. You were missed. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. It'd be a shame to lose an AfD editor as concise, clearheaded, and good at source-checking as yourself. Glad to see you doing the rounds again! - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inre School Girls... found this for starters....

"Presenting the ALL-TIME 100 best films as chosen by TIME'S movie critics Richard Corliss and Richard Schickel" Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like you, I believe this article is a candidate for speedy deletion, and had previously so tagged it. However, that was contested. As your tag was, in fact, a renomination, for procedural reasons I have removed it. I42 (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apartments

Hi Joe. No problem. It's cool, it's cool. Didn't mean to be gruff, I'm just passionate about my little editing area. ;-) For various reasons-- age of the films/sources, access to sourcing, language-- it's a challenging area to work in. There are hundreds of such films produced in Japan every year and just a few of them are of high enough notability to support an article. Part of the challenge is identifying those few. I didn't start the article on this particular film, but it happened to be one of them. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 00:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Pohta ce-am pohtit's talk page.
Message added 12:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pcap ping 12:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the DYK expert

I submitted IBM 608 as I consider that something worth knowing, but nothing much seems to be happening. Am I missing something? Pcap ping 11:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Talk page stalker here. I've assessed and approved your (amended) DYK - congratulations - but the answer to your question is that there is a substantial backlog at DYK and generally nominations that have been in the queue longer will get priority over yours, which can lead to a wait of up to two weeks before your DYK makes it to the main page. If you'd like to see your DYKs approved sooner, consider reviewing some DYKs submitted by other people, to help reduce the backlog! - DustFormsWords (talk) 13:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muir Skate

They were featured in an international magazine, Concrete Wave Magazine volume 6 issue 4, on page 31. At the time they were known as "Muir Surf and Skate". Notable enough? PÆonU (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I added more sources to the Muir Skate deletion discussion. PÆonU (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look at this DYK?

If it hasn't been fixed already by the time you see this, could you check out this DYK for "biosafety cabinet"? It's good except that the count for 5x expansion is complicated by a merge and I don't fully understand the rules for counting in that situation. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Java to UML Sequence Diagram

This article was not written with an intention to promote the tool. It was written with the intention that if someone is looking to do reverse engineering in java how can they do it. Also the article's intention is no different than http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowchart4j.

If you think that the article needs some improvements, please write them on my talk page and I will try and make those changes. Please try to be specific.

Emil Isac

Thank you, Joe! Dahn (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Willem Tibaut for DYK

Thanks for the nomination! Personally I was more amazed to find out he was behind all of those really wierd portrayals of the old Counts of Holland. That one guy with the blanket on his head just puzzles the heck out of me. Jane (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the same Reuters piece, word for word. It's amazing how many places just take the same text without acknowledgment. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. At least I had the fun of creating Category:North Korean television series, which we hopefully can expand(!). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmare Legacy

Please read WP:NOTE. A topic is presumed notable if it has received "significance coverage" from third-party reliable sources. First, two reviews is not "significant coverage". Second, one of those sources isn't even a reliable source. You cannot just grab any review off the web and claim that supports notability. Not to mention the fact that this is a documentary, not a feature film, the requirements of notability are little more stringent. In addition, you should probably read Wikipedia:Notability (films), specifically the "general principles" section that clearly show that this documentary does not meet the film notability guidelines.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, reviews do not necessarily make something notable. If you disagree with my assessment, I suggest you post a discussion at WP:FILMS to get a true consensus on whether this topic deserves a page to itself. You should know that just because something might be notable (and this documentary isn't), doesn't mean that it needs a page to itself.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Where exactly on either page does it say "reviews make the film notable"? It doesn't say that.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources that provide S-I-G-N-F-I-C-A-N-T coverage. The operative words are "significant coverage". Reviews do not provide significant coverage, just plain coverage.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Manga-Manhwa

manga, and manhwa are too different things, sure they look vastly alike, but manhwa is specifically from korea and has notibly been different. One important aspect of manhwa are the names, and you read it normally. Manga is different because it's red backwards. American manga would just be called "American Manga" or "graphic novel" depending on it's label. authentic manga is from japan.;18:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bread Ninja (talkcontribs)

To clarify and expand on what Bread Ninja said, manga is, by its very definition, a comic which is originally published in Japan, intended for consumption by a Japanese audience. Manhwa, on the other hand, refers to comics originally published in Korea (probably almost exclusively South Korea, but that's neither here nor there), for consumption by a Korean audience. In addition, like all Japanese printed material, manga is printed right-to-left (which is how Japanese is read) whereas manhwa is printed left-to-right (which is how Korean is read). Recast is hardly the first example of a licensed manhwa series being promoted in the U.S. as a manga series; indeed, it's par for the course with Tokyopop. What a licensor sells a series as, however, does not change what it is, and there is absolutely no aspect of this series I can see which would justify a "manga" label instead of "manhwa". If you'd like to get further opinions, though, you're more than welcome to present your case at WT:ANIME#Manhwa vs manga. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, there's more information about the English release in the section than in the infobox. Joe Chill (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If anything it could possibly be considered "Korean manga" since that redirects to manga, but furthermore, it can be complained to tokyopop and say it's manhwa. Tokyopop is famous for calling alot of work "manga"Bread Ninja (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bread Ninja, do you find anything wrong with adding information about international publications? Two other editors do despite many articles being like that. Joe Chill (talk) 20:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Jumping in,
I see two issues with the Big section for the English release. First you redo the explanation of Manga vs Manwha in the said section. Second how much room does it leaves to the others releases that should in prose form: Korean, French & German. That section solely dedicated to English release will create something unbalanced in favor of the English release thus constituting an undue weight issue.

All this said i'm for a rewrite of the whole stuff into a section covering all the release and not just the English one. The issue around Tokyopop release it as Manga fooling reviewer along the way should be mentioned in two sentences but re-explaining the difference between Manga & Manwha is out of question. --KrebMarkt 20:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find information about other publications, be my guest. Joe Chill (talk) 20:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have the desire to make a collaboration with you because you are too rigid right now to set the proper mood/atmosphere for fruitful and enjoyable editing party. Do i have refs well, i did find the Korean publisher. --KrebMarkt 20:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a desire to work with you either I guess if you don't want to. I'm all calmed down and actually working quite well with Dinoguy. Joe Chill (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He is quite a bit more calm now, KrebMarkt, and we could use your help... =) for starters, is this on a reliable part of Manga-News' site? ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dropping refs out of nowhere like this or that. Note the French publisher is dead now for releasing to much crappy series and failing to reprint those which sold. Happy DYK. --KrebMarkt 20:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does ANN count too? i thought that also would work ssincer it calls it a manhwa aswell.Bread Ninja (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, KerbMarkt. Thanks for no help. I'll add it and if it's unreliable, someone from DYK will eventually point it out. Joe Chill (talk) 20:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, that Manga-News database is reliable while the other big French animanga website Manga Sanctuary database isn't for the same reason than ANN encyclopedia because they are users editable. That's said their news, columns & reviews are reliable. Speaking of source i noticed that you missed the Mania.com review and the German edition was reviewed by the AnimePro.de. --KrebMarkt 21:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information and sources. Joe Chill (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
i think what also could help if the original cover was placed.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Depends of what you want to emphasize. English cover if you want to point at Tokoypop releasing manwha as manga. Korean cover if you want to emphasize its Korean origin. Then again i don't have the slightest idea on how it's dealt by the Comics project standard. --KrebMarkt 17:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comics project doesn't really have any such standard; they focus much more on American and European comics - manhwa and other East Asian (well, pretty much all other) comics are severely neglected. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
tokyopop has released many manhwa under the name manga. So i think it should be promoted to korean origin. this is very similar to the same situation with manga.Bread Ninja (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The Great Filling Station Holdup"

I just wanted to thank you for nominating my article The Great Filling Station Holdup for DYK. Geeky Randy (talk) 00:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: DYK nomination of Pizzo Coca

Hello, I'm relatively new to this type nomination process and did not want to junk up the template page with newbie questions. Is the 318 characters a count of just the characters that appear in the article? This stub will be hard-pressed to come up with another 1182 characters to bring it up to 1500 characters. I thought it was good because it has 2,256 bytes. I will see if I can find additional sources that can be cited. I have your page on Watch and will see what your reply is here. Thanks in advance. --Morenooso (talk) 22:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I use a Page Size tool that counts the characters with just the text. DYKs have to be at least 1,500 characters. For the Page Size tool and directions for DYK, read WP:DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I just found a larger Italian Wikipedia article on Pizzo Coca. The first one that was listed was a stub. This Pizzo Coca it.wikipedia.org has more information and appears to be sourced by four Italian cites. Do you know how to port over an article like this and could that be used for the character count? --Morenooso (talk) 22:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. I've never dealt with before. You can ask questions on the talk page of WP:DYK. The cool thing about DYK reviewers are that they are patient so they are great help (I wouldn't be reviewing articles if I never asked for help). Joe Chill (talk) 23:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. --Morenooso (talk) 23:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination should now exceed the requirement thanks with an assist from Burpelson AFB. Going back and forth from the Google translations is killing me. --Morenooso (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WiZiQ Article for Deletion

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WiZiQ

Joe Chill,

With respect to WiZiQ, I've added two more sources. One is from Mashable which is a pretty major source on the web, and another is from a site called Silicon India which does not have as much traffic as Mashable but is according to LinkedIn actually a fairly major site [2] ("most trusted source for news and information", "top 4 in the IT News and Media category").

Note also that if you scroll down on the LinkedIn page it says at the bottom in little gray print:

This LinkedIn Company Profile was created by LinkedIn and is about siliconindia. This page is not endorsed by or affiliated with siliconindia. For questions regarding LinkedIn Company Profiles, contact us.

So I would say that there are a total of at least three reliable sources:

  1. . Sramana Mitra's blog -- She is a columnist for Forbes as we talked about on the WiZiQ articles for deletion page.
  2. . Mashable article -- Mashable, a high traffic Internet news blog.
  3. . SiliconIndia article -- SilcionIndia is described by LinkedIn as a prominent and reliable website.

And all of those articles are basically entirely about WiZiQ so they meet significant coverage.

Let me know if you feel this is enough to change your vote.

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WiZiQ

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 17:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Basilica of San Albino

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Willem Thibaut

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Great Filling Station Holdup

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the nomination. Geeky Randy (talk) 21:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at The Bushranger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, SL93. You have new messages at Gongshow's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Gongshow Talk 22:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Space Exploration History on U.S. Stamps

Greetings Joe I am amazed that you found the new page, U.S. Space Exploration History on U.S. Stamps...only five minutes after it was first launched! Do you have some sort of 'radar' that alerts you to new articles? Amazing. I am also working on a quite larger page in my user space: American History on US Postage Stamps. If you have the time check in and leave any thoughts on the discussion page there. Btw, what is DYK all about? In any event, thanks for the encouraging words. All the best. GWillHickers (talk) 23:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion for United Liberal Associations

It's a hard Google translation of the Dutch WP article|. Also, there are plenty of Google returns for the Dutch-language name. --Toussaint (talk) 02:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Recast

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]