User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2018/January-June: Difference between revisions

This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
The Mediation Committee has been disbanded as a result of this discussion.
Other dispute resolution processes should be used for content issues.

Shortcuts

The Mediation Committee was a panel of editors who resolved content disputes on Wikipedia articles by providing formal mediation. The Mediation Committee was established with the Arbitration Committee in 2003 by Jimmy Wales and was the last stage of content dispute resolution on the English Wikipedia. Mediation was entered into voluntarily by the parties to the dispute and did not result in binding resolutions. The Mediation Committee policy documented how the Mediation Committee, its mediators, and the formal mediation process operated. This policy was maintained by the Committee and was considered an authoritative codification of how Committee matters should be conducted.

After a substantial period of inactivity, the Mediation Committee was shut down by community consensus on 12 November 2018.

How to AfD

On page for deletion:-

{{subst:afd1}}
nominated for deletion: see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName]]

({{afdx}} if repeat AfD for same file)

On AfD vote page:-

{{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~
Creating deletion discussion page for [[PageName]] because ...

At THIS PAGE (or find it from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion):-

{{subst:afd3 | pg=PageName}}
(or) {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}
Adding [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName]]

On closing, {{subst:afd top}} & {{subst:afd bottom}}, and after the top template, put Delete or Keep and ~~~~

Temp links

Expectations (Bebe Rexha album)

Hi AA. Can you please protect Expectations (Bebe Rexha album) from being recreated? I would tag it but I assume you are the admin who would be deleting it anyway. There has been no further development on what type of release it is by the artist (it could be a song for all anybody knows), and there is no confirmation it will even be released. It appears users like Jax 0677 and Another Believer have assumed what it is to get the jump on everybody in creating the article. I see Jax left you a message saying "please send it through AfD before deleting again", but redirects don't go through AfD anyway and I don't see why it would need to go through RfD when it's WP:OR to assume what it is in the first place. I am sure the artist, if it were an album, would have said "my album is coming out soon". Instead, she has stated "project". That could mean anything—it could be an art installation. Jax has also created Expectations (EP)—he himself doesn't even know. It's just a guessing game by editors at this point. If Jax 0677 is so concerned, he can ask after it's confirmed what it is to restore the page history. Ss112 15:06, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ss112: I have set Expectations (Bebe Rexha album) to "only administrators can edit it". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you but I meant can it be deleted along with the EP namespace Expectations (EP) I linked to and then prevented from being recreated? These editors have no idea what type of release it is. As I said, it could be anything and editors are inventing terms to apply to it. If they are concerned, surely they can apply after it is confirmed what it is to have the page history restored. Ss112 01:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ss112: I have deleted it. As regards protecting it against re-creation, I found a pointer to a rule in Wikipedia:Protection policy#Extended confirmed protection, and I would prefer advice about what I am allowed to do and what not in protecting a deleted page-name against re-creation. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

But the user will recreate it because they believe it's an album. It's happened several times now. Also, you may have missed above, the user also created Expectations (EP)—can you please delete that as well? I don't know what rule you're referring to, but the page has been deleted several times now. There has been no further news on if it's an album or not. If you do protect it, when it is confirmed as an album, then I don't see why a user can't just message you and ask for it to be unprotected with an official source stating such. Ss112 05:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ss112: I have now deleted page Expectations (EP). But see above about the rule described in Wikipedia:Protection policy#Extended confirmed protection, which I have come across. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't see anything in WP:ECP that says you can't protect a page from being recreated after it's been deleted several times for the same reason. "Extended confirmed protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against disruption that has not yet occurred"—some kind of "disruption" has occurred. It's been recreated and deleted at least three times now. There's nothing to say the users won't do it again. Jax could recreate the article right now if he wanted to, and the reasons it was deleted would still apply. Protecting a page from being recreated by non-admins isn't the same thing as ECP, is it? Ss112 06:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ss112: The two page-names have now been protected as asked. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Baby / Master for kids

I have a doubt. In Baby Meenakshi, "Baby" is not her name, its a term of endearment used to call female child actors, likewise, for boys it is "Master". Is this naming correct ? If WP:COMMONNAME is taken, then Baby Meenakshi definitely scores. But, shouldn't it be Meenakshi (child actor) ? Didn't saw any guideline for this. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

@Let There Be Sunshine: (I live in England.) What to call her may depend on how often she is called Baby Meenakshi and how often she is called anything else. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks. BTW, Chala (marketplace) you moved on December 23 is now moved to Chalai Market, which is again not a proper noun. Chala (or Chalai) is the name of a marketplace in Thiruvananthapuram. It should be either Chala (marketplace) or Chala, Thiruvananthapuram as it initially was and best defines. Could you intervene here. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
@Let There Be Sunshine: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to learn how did you transcribed this. Thanks. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 06:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

@Let There Be Sunshine: With a program called Typecase, which I wrote with help from a Unicode manual and the Visual C++ compiler (and before that, the Borland C++ compiler). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Wow. Is it available on the internet ? Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Cleaning up after moves

Anthony, I've asked you this before, but I'll repeat it. When you move a page, especially (but not exclusively) to redirect a title to a disambiguation page, please check "What links here". When you moved Ring Around the Moon earlier, you (a) did not edit the disambiguation page Rings Around the Moon, which still contained a link to the old title, and made the actual article about the Space:1999 episode unreachable; and (b) did not fix at least three redirects to the title you moved, Ring Around The Moon (Space: 1999), Ring Around The Moon (Space: 1999 episode), and Ring Around The Moon (Space 1999 episode), which all pointed to the disambiguation page instead of the episode article. As I know that you are a responsible admin, I'm sure it was not your intention to leave broken links like this, but hopefully this will serve as a reminder to be more thorough in completing page moves. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

@R'n'B: Thanks for pointing out my error to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Celeris Inc listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Celeris Inc. Since you had some involvement with the Celeris Inc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of -physis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article -physis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-physis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

AO Tennis histmerge

Please merge the history of AO Tennis (video game) to AO Tennis. You forgot to do so earlier. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

2002 estyle.com Classic

Hi, per your diff my Requested move/Technical request to move 2002 estyle.com Classic to 2002 JPMorgan Chase Open has been 'done' but the article is still named 2002 estyle.com Classic. --Wolbo (talk) 13:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Wolbo: Done It needed history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Thx! --Wolbo (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

"AT&T Corporation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "AT&T Corporation". Since you had some involvement with the "AT&T Corporation" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 22:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

The Last Jedi

This happened when I was replying while you were fixing matters. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

In short, I'm requesting that it be deleted. And thanks for fixing the move. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

@Flyer22 Reborn: The above link points to Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi/Archive audience response, which ends in new discussion which still seems to be active. What were you wanting me to delete? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Page Michael Demers deleted?

Anthony -- The page for Michael Demers (artist) was recently deleted. The remarks say content was taken from LinkedIn (probably a list of exhibitions?). Is there any way to get the page back, with the offending material removed? The page had been up for a few years, and never had an issue... --73.253.57.124 (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

@73.253.57.124: I have undeleted and AfD'ed page Michael Demers: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Demers. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Why do you want to have this page removed? Isn't this just as valid a page as Michael Mandiberg, Constant Dullaart or any other contemporary new media artists? The page has been up since 2013, reviewed multiple times, edited -- why the problem now? And what was taken from LinkedIn? Everything has been cited appropriately on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.253.57.124 (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Synthwave

What was going on there??? ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 20:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Crash Underride: Someone wanted me to move Synthwave (2000s genre) to Synthwave. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay, because on my watch list I just saw a string of moves, etc. that kinda boggled my mind for a minute. lol ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Döner kebab

Hi, I noticed this has just been moved, as WP:RMT. I don't object to the move, but as I've not come across this process before, shouldn't the archived opposed WP:RM have taken some sort of precedence? Mighty Antar (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mighty Antar: Best regularly keep an eye on page Wikipedia:Requested moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Antofalla

Greetings,

are you sure that Antofalla and User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Antofalla have parallel histories? According to the former's history there are two edits on 18:22, 5 December 2017‎ and 22:54, 19 January 2018‎ whereas the first edit in the sandbox is 20:03, 19 January 2018 and the last 22:53, 19 January 2018‎ so the latter would still fit between the two edits on the article, with no overlap. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Dominionism

I think you've made a mistake with this rename. The current name was, I think, the result of a merge discussion - i.e. "Dominionism" was merged into "Dominion Theology", and so should not be moved without discussion. In any case, it means the talk page is broken - it says, "The content of Dominionism was merged into Dominionism on 6 September 2013..." St Anselm (talk) 07:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@StAnselm: The merge between Dominionism and Dominion Theology was a text-merge (performed by User:Jfhutson in late August 2013‎), not a history-merge. The old version of Dominionism is now at Dominionism (version 2). Do you want me to move Dominionism back to Dominion Theology? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, please it move it back to Dominion Theology. St Anselm (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@StAnselm: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. St Anselm (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Marko Stojanović (actor)

Hello, dear Anthony! Can you please show me this deleted article, only one section was questioned and copied, and i would create new article, so i dont need to start literary everything from scratch. This is very notable subject... Thank you in advance, you can send it by mail also, if you dont want to show it. Thank you very much! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 16:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

@Anastan: I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Stojanović (actor). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, that is more then enough! I will fix that one copyvio section ip added, subject is very notable, no need for entire article to go. All best, Anthony! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 16:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Help!

In ictu oculi is in the habit of making unilateral moves without discussion, and without even explaining in the edit summary. I think one of the reasons he keeps doing this is because there are no consequences. I hope you agree such actions should be discouraged. One way to do this, I think, is to revert any such moves and thus force him to make the case for the move. That's why I posted the technical request as I did. WP:RM address this:

"If you disagree with such a move [moved without a discussion], and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons then you may request a technical move."

I suggest the correct course in these situation is not to challenge my technical request to revert an undiscussed move, but to grant the request (after all, I could have legitimately reverted if not for the technical limitation), and have the initial mover create an RM request per WP:RM. Thanks. --В²C ☎ 23:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

And you ☎ B2C are I'm afraid in the habit of not contributing to the encyclopaedia's content pages. What % of your edits over the last year have been actual improvements to content side - expanding and creating articles and navigation, adding graphics, adding sources? And what % of your edits have been arguing for your views on titling on Talk pages? or following editors as in this case? If I may be permitted a suggestion, perhaps you could find another editor to follow, or perhaps contribute to improving article content. Just a suggestion. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your retort is this red herring ad hominem attack? That speaks volumes. Not playing. --В²C ☎ 00:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

@In ictu oculi and Born2cycle: Please, what is this dispute about? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

This dispute is about three things:

IIO moved Kolossus to Kolossus (album) without discussion, despite there being no other topics called "Kolossus" with articles on WP (an inherently controversial move which should go through RM). I was unable to revert it per BRD and RM due to technical limitations, so I had to make a technical request to revert. I mistakenly put my request to revert this undiscussed move at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Contested_technical_requests instead of at the section specially designed for such requests at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requests_to_revert_undiscussed_moves. You apparently did not recognize that it was a request to revert an undiscussed move, and, instead of rubber stamping it and granting the revert request, you made it a formal RM at what is now Talk:Kolossus (album).
More importantly, IIO is in the habit of making these undiscussed moves quite frequently, moves that he knows are controversial and should go through RM, often doing so without even leaving explanation in the edit summary. His history is replete with examples of this. Many times I've requested he stop doing this over the years, to no avail. Suggestions?
IIO tries to deflect discussion of his problematic behavior by bringing up my low content-to-talk-page edit ratio, which is an obvious ad hominem red herring.

Those are the three things this dispute is about. --В²C ☎ 20:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

@In ictu oculi and Born2cycle: Kolossus (disambiguation) lists 5 things called Kolossus that Wikipedia describes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
@In ictu oculi and Born2cycle: See Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves for instructions how to ask for a discussed page move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Anthony, that's a brand new dab page just created by IIO with mostly dubious entries. Only one entry on that dab page, the album name, is clearly legit; it's the only topic listed there that is actually named Kolossus. All the others violate WP:PTM: ("A disambiguation page is not a search index. Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title, or a link that includes the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion or reference. "). Note that Mega Shark vs. Kolossus is exactly "a link that includes the page title (Kolossus) in a longer proper name". This is why I wanted you to rubber-stamp revert in the first place. All these issues should all be sorted out first, in a discussion. Then, if consensus is established to disambiguate it, only then should it happen. Until then, his undiscussed unilateral and clearly controversial disambiguation move should be reverted.

IIO knows exactly how to request controversial and potentially controversial moves. He just often refuses to do it. I won't speculate why, because that would violate AGF. Anyway, what I requested - a revert of a page recently moved without discussion - is totally different, and even has a special section at WP:RM. Surely you know and understand this. --В²C ☎ 22:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)'

NOTE: I removed all the dubious entries at Kolossus (disambiguation) - see the history of that page for justification of each removal. --В²C ☎ 23:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Page deletion

Hi. I'm not very good at figuring out which code to use, so came by to ask you (or a page reader) if you could deep-six the page The Nineties (TV program) as a later and lesser duplicate of the topic The Nineties (miniseries). And did someone notice that the four-tilde code is no longer on the edit summary bar? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

@Randy Kryn: I redirected it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, my apologies for the extra work. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

D.A.Z.

Please do not move requests for reverting undiscussed moves to the article talk page using my name. I do not intend to start a RM if the request is denied. Thanks. Station1 (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

More at User talk:AlexTheWhovian#D.A.Z. -- Alex^TW 21:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Please revert your addition to Talk:D.A.Z. (album). I've changed my mind and no longer wish to request a page move. (Of course, you are free to make your own proposal if you wish.) Thanks. Station1 (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, you inadvertently removed the signature from the previous section on that talk page. Station1 (talk) 23:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Station1 and AlexTheWhovian: I have closed the move request "no move". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Defence, Karachi Wikipedia article

Hi Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs) I see that you reverted Defence, Karachi to Defence Housing Authority, Karachi. I'd like to take this minute to explain why I made the move. The term "Defence Housing Authority" is not the name of the locality...it's the name of the the governing body of that neighbourhood. This would be akin to saying that somebody from London lives in the London Metropolitan Corporation. It makes no sense...when I requested the move, the it was opposed by two members who seem to have an extreme personal vendetta against me. I would implore you to see this dilemma from a common sense point of view..."Defence Housing Authority, Karachi" is not the name of a locality. --PAKHIGHWAY (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@PAKHIGHWAY: A disambiguator is needed on this article's name. To people who do not know Karachi, "Defence" means "the act of defending" or "the people who defend" rather than an area of housing. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Crayola marker colors

Can you perform a HISTMERGE for List of Crayola marker colors. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ssjhowarthisawesome: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band

The history of Draft:Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band did not only consist of 2 redirects. The draft was copy-pasted into Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band instead of being moved. You should therefore undelete the full history of the former and merge it to the latter. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Timberwolf (color)

Can you restore the deleted revision(s) of the Timberwolf (color) page from July 2011 to complete the redirect page's history.208.54.85.208 (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Nogay Horde

Now that I looked into it deeper, the IP user who moved Nogai Horde to Nogay Horde did so against its usage in the rest of Wikipedia. Type in "Nogai" and a dozen articles pop up with that spelling. What would be the best way to restore the original Nogai Horde and have Nogay Horde redirect there? Thanks, --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

@Kintetsubuffalo: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Entry Deletion " Brian Cliette"

Hello Anthony Appleyard,

I see you recently voted to delete my wiki entry "Brian Cliette" for lack on nobility ,I think this was a mistake as he has over 7 media mentions and interviews in top online outlets ( entrepreneur.com, The Huffington Post, Business.com, Influencive.com..etc) you can see the following google news results for "Brian Cliette" in the link below https://www.google.com/search?biw=2560&bih=1366&tbm=nws&ei=oLN2WoTDHbDs5gLmvpSIBA&q=%22brian+cliette%22

Please advise.

Thanks for your time and consideration,

Carla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writewords44 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Writewords44: Page Brian Cliette was deleted at 18:58, 28 September 2017 by User:Jo-Jo Eumerus, after failing AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Cliette. Ater that, Draft:Brian Cliette was "Submission declined" on 15 December 2017 by User:Bradv, and speedy-delete-tagged by Bradv as "a page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, is substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. .", and deleted by me. I looked at your Google search, and it returned only 7 results. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard:Those 7 were only the google news results from top tier news sites.

The google web results several hundred. Thanks for reviewing them. There are public figures on wikipedia that contain 1 meation from some of these sites and they are live and not deleted. Would you suggest a resubmitting the entry with updated references from entrepreneur.com, The Huffington Post, Business.com, Influencive.com ? I think the major issue before was 5 of the 7 references used were from Penn State, nor did the books authored by Brian in the entry contain ISBN

Again thanks for all of your help in this matter!

Cheers,

Carla

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Writewords44 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Writewords44: A compare of the last edits of Brian Cliette (which was deleted after discussion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Cliette) and of Draft:Brian Cliette shows that their texts are identical. The result of another AfD on it would be the same as before. You would have to write another article, showing much more that he is notable, and not looking like a routine curriculum vitae: see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard: Thanks for these guidelines I have referenced see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site, I will work on a second draft and ping you to give it a review before being submitted again. Warm regards, Carla

roly poly oly

Can you restore the deleted revisions of the Roly poly oly page to complete the pages history. 2601:584:100:E310:F907:6DCD:FC08:E17C (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@2601:584:100:E310:F907:6DCD:FC08:E17C: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Coke (soft drink)

Can you restore the deleted revision of the page Coke (soft drink) to complete history. 172.56.26.114 (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Crestview (Capital MetroRail station)

Hi, There is a RM on the page. for the first one, can you move it over the redirect? i'll move the rest. Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Artix Kreiger: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Histmerge

Can you read Special:MergeHistory for future histmerges. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for February:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/67|Black women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/68|Mathematicians and statisticians]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/69|Geofocus: Island women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ipigott: Unfortunately, I am a man. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Anthony Appleyard: So am I, like many other members of WiR. We share the same concerns as women members of the project and do our best to increase the coverage of women on Wikipedia. Whether or not you become a member, I hope you will continue to contribute more articles about women and their works.--Ipigott (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Darwin Thornberry

Can you restore all deleted edits to the Darwin Thornberry page to complete history. 172.56.27.5 (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Histmerge

Please explain your hist-merge related to St Joseph's Primary School, Mysore.Thanks!~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Winged Blades of Godric: At 10:25, 6 February 2018 User:Winged Blades of Godric asked for a history-merge St. Joseph's High School, Mysore to St Joseph's Primary School, Mysore. St Joseph's Primary School, Mysore had only 2 edits, at 10:25, 6 February 2018 and 10:31, 6 February 2018, both by User:Winged Blades of Godric . But by then, the last user edit of St. Joseph's High School, Mysore was at 19:49, 6 February 2018 (plus a bot edit by AnomieBOT at 20:09, 6 February 2018‎), because User:Rms125a@hotmail.com had made 2 more edits, overtaking St Joseph's Primary School, Mysore. So I made a plain move. to avoid WP:Parallel histories.Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@@ Line 395: / Line 395: @@
 *{{ping|Writewords44}} A compare of the last edits of [[Brian Cliette]] (which was deleted after discussion in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Cliette]]) and of [[Draft:Brian Cliette]] shows that their texts are identical. The result of another AfD on it would be the same as before. You would have to write another article, showing much more that he is notable, and not looking like a routine [[curriculum vitae]]: see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site]]. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard#top|talk]]) 05:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
+*{{ping|Anthony Appleyard}} Thanks for these guidelines I have referenced see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site]], I will work on a second draft and ping you to give it a  review before being submitted again. Warm regards, Carla
 ==roly poly oly==

User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2018/January-June: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:46, 8 February 2018

Links

Archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages

How to AfD

Temp links

Expectations (Bebe Rexha album)

Baby / Master for kids

Cleaning up after moves

Celeris Inc listed at Redirects for discussion

Nomination of -physis for deletion

AO Tennis histmerge

2002 estyle.com Classic

"AT&T Corporation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The Last Jedi

Page Michael Demers deleted?

Synthwave

Döner kebab

Antofalla

Dominionism

Marko Stojanović (actor)

Help!

Page deletion

D.A.Z.

Defence, Karachi Wikipedia article

List of Crayola marker colors

Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band

Timberwolf (color)

Nogay Horde

Entry Deletion " Brian Cliette"

roly poly oly

Coke (soft drink)

Talk:Crestview (Capital MetroRail station)

Histmerge

Invitation to join Women in Red

Darwin Thornberry

Histmerge