User talk:Marrovi

Hello, Marrovi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your scontributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! J.Naven 21:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of List of Mexicans in the world

The article List of Mexicans in the world has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Badly referenced, inaccurate list with little encyclopaedic value. For example the reference for 107 Mexicans in New Zealand is to an official site that refers to 450 Mexicans registered with the local embassy rather than how many actually are bona fide immigrants. Other figures are based on out of date references and have spurious precision - e.g. exactly 2,327 in Costa Rica almost a decade ago. Most references are not in English so cannot be verified by users of the English version of Wikipedia. Anyway, what's the use of this list? Fails WP:VER and WP:NOT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 23:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Mexicans in the world

I have nominated List of Mexicans in the world, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mexicans in the world. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: America

Yes but generally speaking, its North America and South America not "America". We have to be universal and formal here and not based on one country or another. Yes America is a nickname for the US but if you notice, I change those links to United States all of the time (and for American as well). Why? Because the country's name is the United States. And the continents' names are North and South America, not "America". --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 00:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me

There was an uncorrect commentary, excuse me --Uskill (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Mexican Women

That's interesting, but I wonder why are you telling me about them? Ocelotl10293 (talk) 23:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Spanish Mexican

Hola, Marrovi.

Veo que es necesario explicarle que esos dos gentilicios yuxtapuestos simplemente signfican lo siguiente: persona mejicana de orígen en el país de España. Y ese es un ejemplo de una regla general, al menos en Wikipedia.

De manera que "Spanish Mexican" sí abarca a todas las varias etnias y nacionalidades de España, Marrovi. Y debería serle obvio que "Mexican" es el gentilicio para todos los mejicanos, sin distinción de raza, etnia o absolutamente nada.

Mi intención es mudar el artículo de vuelta, pero me gustaría recibir su respuesta antes, si puede, hoy mismo. Gracias. SamEV (talk) 01:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

---

Pues ojalá los vuelva a mudar, especialmente los que no hablan solamente de inmigración, sino que también tratan de otros temas. Pero aún los que por el momento solo tratan de inmigración podrían estar en vía de ampliación. SamEV (talk) 02:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

---

¿Yo? ¡Ja! Te aseguro que acaso el resto del año me baste, porque yo preferiría revisarlos cada uno, y ese es el tipo de tarea que yo evito hasta el último momento. SamEV (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Defense of White Argentine

Hi, sorry to bother you, but Andy the Grump and other user want to move for deletion of White Argentine. Please, if you agree that it should not be deleted, add your comment in the article's talk page. Thanks for your attention and help.--Pablozeta (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Help Stopping the Deletion of White Argentine

If you agree that it should not be deleted, please add your arguments here.--~~

WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americans

Hi Marrovi, I notice that you were active on the Nahautl wiki. Would you have any interest in developing a WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americans? The discussion, such that it is, is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi

Mayan Wikipedia

Hi Marrovi, I cannot read or write Mayan, but I'll wager some of the editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mesoamerica might be Mayan language students. You might consider posting on that project's talk page? Good luck! -Uyvsdi (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi

Q'eqchi' people

Please see Talk:Q'eqchi' people#338 in El Salvador -- PhJ (talk) 05:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Pic

I like that pic of Lake Zumpango!Thelmadatter (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Actually, Im not far from there. I live in el DF.Thelmadatter (talk) 13:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited Spanish immigration to Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited Colombian immigration to Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnaval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Tloque Nahuaque

Hola Marrovi, es posible que Leon-Portilla antes decia que Tloque Nahuaque era una deidad no identica con Tezcatlipoca. En su trabajo reciente no comete ese error y reconoce que refiere principalmente a Tezcatlipoca como lo dice Sahagun. El dice que tambien se usa para referirse a Ometeotl. La idea existencia de Ometeotl es problematica, y otros historiadores han argumentado que no habia taol deidad, pero que es simplemente una introduccion de los frailes en su intento de convertir los Aztecas al monoteismo. No hay nadie ahora que piensa que Tloque Nahuaque era una deidad aparte, todos reconocen que simplemente es otro nombre por unos de los dioses mayores de los Aztecas, sea tezcatlipoc o sea Ometeotl si es que exista. Recomiendo estos dos articulos:Haly, Richard (1992). "Bare Bones: Rethinking Mesoamerican Divinity". History of Religions. 31 (3): 269–304. {{cite journal}}: templatestyles stripmarker in |author= at position 1 (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

Payàs, Gertrudis (2004). "Translation in Historiography: The Garibay/León-Portilla Complex and the Making of a Pre-Hispanic Past". Meta : journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators' Journal. 49 (3): 544–561. {{cite journal}}: templatestyles stripmarker in |author= at position 1 (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Tu mismo te respondiste el comentario, nunca dije que mis ancestros mexicanos haya sido politeístas esas son cosas que tu quieres aclarar cuando todo mundo sabemos que los aztecas eran politeístas; hablas de la influencia que existía de la cristiandad entre los frailes, pero esa es la misma lógica de los autores contemporáneos que también están influenciados por grupos de poder y de distintas organizaciones porque les finencean sus obras, los años de investigación no les dá más crédito que autores del pasado, al fin y al cabo sus obras siguen siendo teorías y estan sujetas a crítica. Tloque Nahuaque ha sido el nombre muchos dioses aztecas, Ometeotl, Tezcatlipoca, Quetzalcoatl hasta Huehuecoyotl, pero también ha sido nombrado por los escritores de forma independiente, y no se ya nos entendimos; Tloque Nahuaque no es tampoco el dios biblíco por mucho que existan semejanzas y muchas diferencias, aveces la eurocentricidad niega y denigra el pensamiento que no es europeo por querer seguir una línea continua del pensamiento crítico que tuvo su origen en los griegos y que se prolongó con la ilustración y el renacimiento.--Marrovi (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Marrovi, en cuanto produzcas unos fuentes que sean confiables y recientes que afirmen lo que estas diciendo tenemos una discusion, por ahora simplemente estas presentando tu opinion. Para incluir la informacion que tu quieres es necesario que primeramente presentes fuentes que argumenta explicitamente que Tloque Nahuaque es un dios independiente y despues de que demuestres que estas fuentes sean respetados y influenciales. Mientras no hagas eso no hay discusion. Es la conclusion de la gran mayoria de academicos que tus ancestros hayan sido politeistas, tus ideas conspiratorias de sus fuentes de financiamento estan por tu propia cuenta.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Conhecimento de língua mirandesa

Viva. Segundo o registo, contribuistes para mwl.wikipedia em algum momento no passado. Na minha opinião, alguma das contribuições que analisei foi linguisticamente relevante. Ultimamente tenho andado a tentar perceber o estado linguístico de mwl.wikipedia. Seria um grande auxílio se pudésseis revelar alguma informação sobre o vosso conhecimento da língua mirandesa. Podeis contactar-me na minha página de discussão. Muito obrigado desde já. Saúde. Garsd (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Central Nahuatl

Hi,

I removed

• Highland Central Nahuatl

as undefined. I don't see anything particular about it in the ref, there's no indication of which varieties it includes, nor why it should be bolded.

— kwami (talk) 18:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This applies to infoboxes, too.

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 07:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British immigration to Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish immigration to Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aranda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Moving "Mexican American" to "Mexican immigration to United States"

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mexicans in Panama

The article Mexicans in Panama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A new article with no attempt to assert notability or provide any sources; best to delete and allow it to be recreated if possible when some sources can be found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your article Diana Jaqueline Rodríguez Carrillo

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Diana Jaqueline Rodríguez Carrillo to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 03:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erika Dobosiewicz

The article Erika Dobosiewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Facebook

Pelmazo, hay contestas en mensaje....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.148.92.240 (talk) 00:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!!--Marrovi (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tejupilco (municipality) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

moving diaspora articles to migration

Could we get you not to move citizenship articles to immigrant titles. -- Moxy (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Diaspora -- the people and their descendent who have left a country and spread out in the outside world.

Expatriate -- someone from one country living in another who holds former citizenship.

Immigrant -- term for the first generation person in a given country who has moved to that country from another country.

Dibujo

Hey Marrovi que tal le parece mi dibujo, jaja, nada que ver, la verdad esta inspirado en su foto que puso en la discusión cuando hablaba de que esta orgulloso de como es, saludos--Medo567890 (talk) 04:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

tan enojado que es, jajaja

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Medo567890 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Good!!--Marrovi (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Manuel Rodríguez Villegas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manuel Rodríguez Villegas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Rodríguez Villegas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Movement Republic of Baja California

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Movement Republic of Baja California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Flag of Tamaulipas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Tamaulipas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Tamaulipas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Flag of Quintana Roo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Quintana Roo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Quintana Roo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Los Bybys

Do not remove references, unless you provide a better one. The reference you are removing is not "a policy note" (whatever that means) but a local news site from the Zumpango region, and it specifically includes the piece of information that it is used to support, namely that Los Bybys were formed in Tequixquiac in 1991. You should have provided a reference when you wrote this. I did it for you. So dont remove it.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Flag of Tlaxcala

La proxima vez que adicionas informacion y agregas una supuesta fuente que no contiene la informacion que estas adicionando te voy a reportar a ANI, y voy a tener que mencionar que estas bloqueado en la es.wiki exactamente por ese mismo problema.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 22:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• Wikipedia no es un lugar libre. Es una enciclopedia. Tiene reglas. Conoces las reglas, te han informado multiples veces de ellas. Yo te he expplicado con paciencia y detalle que no puedes adicionar informacion con fuentes falsas o sin fuentes. Sin embargo lo sigues haciendo. Como aparentemente te estas negando totalmente a aprender a como funciona wikipedia y a seguir los consejos y reglas de la comunidad no creo que puedas esperar que te vaya de otra forma aqui que como te fue en es.wiki. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 22:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Apaxco page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tequixquiac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Others. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cerro Mesa Ahumada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cerro Mesa Ahumada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJH2018talk 23:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Hueypoxtla (municipality) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of regions of Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Costa Chica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Habited and inhabited

Hi. In cases such as this, the English word you want is "inhabited". I know it sounds wrong at first but I assure you that it is correct - an inhabited place is lived in. "Habited" means something different and is not correct how you've been using it. I hope this helps. Best wishes 82.36.105.25 (talk) 15:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Moxy (talk) 02:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Sephardi

You are writing a list of names that you claim are Sephardi as a response to my comment on the talkpage. The list is of course 100% irrelevant, since no one is going to accept your personal claims as evidence for which names are sephardi. Some of the names you add, I do believe are likely to be common among sephardim, or even exclusive to Sephardi communities, but whether or not I believe it doesnt matter much unless you can actually provide some reliable sources. For many of the other names you believe to be sephardi are simply mistaken, for example the names in -ez which are an ancient Spanish patronymic, the names based on places (Toledano) or professions (Zapatero) obviously cannot be considered exclusive to Sephardim either. Claiming so, and doing so without presenting any evidence whatsoever, is just a silly waste of time. Your idea that inquisition records can be used as evidence of Sephardi names is frankly both ludicrous and scary. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 18:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Atotonilco de Tula

added links pointing to Progreso, Conejos and El Refugio

Huehuetoca

added a link pointing to San Bartolo

Tepeji

added a link pointing to San Buenaventura

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Tula de Allende (municipality)

Please note that you copied and pasted (and subsequently deleted) from Tula de Allende to Tula de Allende (municipality) a lot of text which you did not write. This is copyright violation. Please make sure that the moved text is properly attributed, otherwise I will have to revert your edits. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

I have repeatedly informed him of this fact. Yet he continues creating articles by copypasting. So in the future just revert it when he does it.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 06:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Marrovi, if you make one more Wikipedia edit without addressing this point, I will revert all of your edits in these articles.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done, and will continue reverting copyright violations. Reinstatement may result in blocks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Marrovi. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 03:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thank you by the notes. Greetings.--Marrovi (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome, Marrovi. Please remember that editors work as a community. It would also be appreciated if you could provide edit summaries as it informs other editors of what changes you've made and why. Happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, we are in contact.--Marrovi (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Agustín Tlaxiaca, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Actopan and El Arenal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Marrovi. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 21:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Rayón, State of México

Hi, I'm Dane2007. Marrovi, thanks for creating Rayón, State of México!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand upon this page and add additional information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dane2007 (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Nicolás Tolentino Temple and Ex-Monastery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidalgo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Malinalco page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

último aviso.

Con razón te loquearon de 4 proyectos. Antes de continuar, avisarte que no se te ocurra descargar tu ira sobre mi (porque eso es lo que hiciste con akapochtli: Descargar toda tu ira sobre el). Fijate ese articulo que TU MISMO hiciste. En las primeras revisiones de ese articulo ESTABAS CAMBIANDO varias veces el mismo dato (las coordenadas ), de manera que el dato que tu pusiste ERA ERRONEO TOTALMENTE. Y eso demuestra dos cosas: 1) Que NO usas referencias o al menos, no usas fuentes fiables o validas y 2) que tu mismo sabes que publicas informacion que no estas seguro de que es al 100% correcta. Y otra cosa, NO DEBES BORRAR AVISOS DE TU DISCUSION. El mensaje que te deje que borraste, bueno eso si lo puedes borrar, PERO EL AVISO QUE TE DIO MAUNUS y LOS AVISOS EN GENERAL (COMO ESTE), NO SE BORRAN. Te aviso que eso de borrar avisos es puro vandalismo y añade otra "marca sucia imposible de que desinfectes" a tu historial. (Ni se te ocurra tergiversarme, tu sabes muy bien lo que te digo). Y eso NO ES MAS QUE UN EJEMPLO DE LO QUE HACES, MUCHOS DE TUS ARTICULOS NO TIENEN CALIDAD. Y con calidad, me refiero a que cometes muchos errores en muchos (por no decir todos o casi todos) de tus artículos. El 98% de los artículos que tu creas, no tienen calidad ni tampoco relevancia enciclopedica. Te aconsejo ver listas de artículos requeridos (artículos que si que tienen relevancia). Cuando tu haces articulos, ni siquiera te molestas en agregar referencias, NI WIKIFICARLOS. Hay wikis mas aptas para ti, (yo por ejemplo, vengo de un wiki que es externo a todo wikimedia, en el que no se suelen añadir referencias y los articulos son mas cortos,no es necesario ponerle tantos contenidos a los articulos y el wiki es como una wikipedia mas simple). Deberias mirar wikis alternativos a wikipedia, que sean mas aptos para ti, como el que menciono. Ya que en wikis como esos, te desarrollias mejor y podrias trabajar mejor el tema de la seriedad. Los problemas que veo que presentan tus articulos, son estos:

a) Falta de referencias (o de referencias fiables).

b) Falta de contenido

c) Falta de wikificación.

d) Informacion no veridica o que no coincide con la verdad (esto se evitaria cumpliendo el punto a).

Te aviso que borrar este mensaje es vandalismo. Tambien te digo que esta clase de actitud, no mejora, sino que perjudica en gran cantidad al wiki. Sé que tus intenciones son buenas, y ADMIRO tu pasion por las lenguas indigenas, y eso, pero debes comprender, que si te prohibieron hacer ediciones de esos temas, es por alguna razon. Por ultimo decir, que es MUY Molesto tener que IR REVISANDO, todas tus ediciones, una por una, para "desinfectar las mierdas y sacar la basura" que tu provocas (disculpa el lenguaje, pero que estoy cansado de verdad). POr favor, te pido que a partir de ahora, hagas caso a los avisos, y que antes de publicar cualquier informacion, MIRES FUENTES FIABLES (como un libro, que puedes poner como una referencia que has mirado un libro, poniendo el titulo y la editorial). Este va a ser el ultimo mensaje que te dirija a ti, No quiero contactarme contigo mas a menos que sea estrictamente necesario. Por cierto, NO Hace falta que me respondas si no quieres. Tampoco te impido borrar el mensaje, pero ten en cuenta que hacerlo, ensuciará mas tu historial, y le "echara todavia mas peste a la mierda". En serio, o cambias tu actitud o la pasarás mal. Un saludo. --Nobita931 (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

(Articulo incompleto, sin referencias que sean suficientes y mal wikificado. Sigues en la misma marrovi, a pesar de los multiples avisos que tienes (y que eliminas). Sinceramente, desberias ser loqueado.) Muy curioso el mensaje, ¿Dónde he visto este tipo de textos amenazantes? ¿Quiénes los hacen o los utilizan?.--Marrovi (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Santiago Tilapa

Las coordenadas exactas no dan con el lugar exacto de ubicación ¿Eso tiene lógica? o debo explicarlo con manzanitas?. Sé porque has escrito en mi portal de discusión, te llevo muchos años, y por tipo de mensajes amenazantes no dudo quien está atrás de esto. Te hago saber claramente para que no estes disciendo que te lavo el cerebro o que estoy atacando o que te trato mal, si realmente te interesara trabajar en esta wikipiedia lo estarías haciendo, pero bueno, tu sabes lo que haces, solo recuerda este refrán polular de mi familia el que anda de redentor, puede salir crucificado, Saludos, que tengáis un buen día.--Marrovi (talk) 18:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Mensajes para tenerlo en cuenta

Ayúda

Soy nuevo, recien empece a editar en wikipedia el pasado 13 de jUlio y me gustaria que me explicaras:

1- ¿Como me puedo unir al wikiproyecto de anime y manga? Es que me interesa.

2- Tambien me gustaria que me pasarás un link a una pagina en la que se listan los artículos por crear, porque me gustaria colaborar con el contenido de los artículos y no solamente con las reversiones.

Un saludo. --Nobita931 (talk) 08:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Otra cosa: ¿Esta wiki tiene paginas como el tablon de anuncios o el cafe de wikipedia en español?

Quisiera que me pasaras un link a ellas en caso de que existan de verdad. --Nobita931 (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Tambien quiero que veas este mensaje que le deje a MarcoAurelio y decirte que marrovi borro el aviso que le diste en su discusion de sus articulos. saludos. --Nobita931 (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Esta acción también se considera vandalism, es la elaboración de mensajes insendiarios, ya que estos mensajes tienen otros fines.--Marrovi (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Te vengo a comentar un tema que me tiene bastante preocupado: @Marrovi: y sus artículos que estan mal hechos (sin referencias, sin relevancia aparente algunos, sin wikificar, sin casi contenido, etc). Estos artículos que el hace no tienen casi relevancia enciclopedica. La mayoria de articulos de marrovi (por no decir todos, o casi todos), no sirven al wiki mas que para aumentar el contador de los articulos creados. En una wiki pequeña, (como la nah.wikipedia de la que viene el), esto seria acceptable (acceptable de que harian falta mas artículos), pero en wikipedias y en wikis que son tan grandes como esta (la wikipedia mas grande), NO necesitamos que hayan articulos solamente para aumentar el contador de ediciones. En wikis grandes como esta, con muchos artículos, ya no importa la cantidad. En wikis tan grandes como esta SÓLO IMPORTA LA CALIDAD. Y los artículos de marrovi NO tienen calidad suficiente para dejarse publicar. Decirte que el comportamiento de marrovi es simplemente inacceptable y que me gustaria que me dijeras un lugar EN ESTE WIKI en el que pueda hacer un reporte de sus acciones. LO PEOR DE TODO es que marrovi, no hace caso a los avisos y es un usuario veterano. Yo entenderia estos errores de un anonimo, de un novato, pero de un usuario como marrovi que lleva al menos 9 AÑOS en el mundo de las wikis, es inacceptable sencillamente esto. Además, marrovi fue avisado en incontables veces Y ENCIMA BORRA TODOS LOS AVISOS. FIJATE ESA REVISION EN LA QUE MARROVI BORRABA EL AVISO que le dieron. Saludos. --Nobita931 (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tepoxteco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicontepec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mennonites in Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marrovi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Eduardo Montagner Anguiano is not written in English. I see this is not the first article you created with serious language problems. Next time, blocks can be given.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Now, very good.--Marrovi (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

¡Feliz año nuevo!

Marrovi, aunque no te lo creas, sigo deseándote lo mejor del mundo en la vida real, espero que te la pases bien en compañía de amigos y familiares. Cuando vuelvas a venir contáctame y con gusto te llevaré a comer cabrito o carne asada, como alguna vez hice con Iván, que para eso los regios nos pintamos solos. No tengo nada contra ti y lamento que las cosas terminaran de esa forma, pero tú debes admitir que te equivocaste bastante y te empecinaste en no reconocerlo. Suerte, salud y amor en este 2017. Un abrazo.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Si te creo, no hay razón para no creerte, eres buena persona; este viaje a MTY fue rápido porque tuvimos que ir por unos montenes para poder ensamblarlos acá en Veracruz, solo dos días estuve, pero sí, estaría bien saludarnos y salir a pasear por MTY; ya está muy cambiada la ciudad, ha crecido mucho. Tenía diez años que no visitaba Monterrey, me encantó verla muy cosmopolita y con nuevos rascacielos. Hecho, me quedaré más tiempo el la proxima visita, muchos saludos y buen principio de año.--Marrovi (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Please don't move categories without discussion

Please don't move categories without discussing them first at either WP:Categories for discussion or WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy as appropriate. In particular this rename was inappropriate as it breaks a basic rule, that categories should follow the name of the corresponding article. In this case Texcoco is a disambiguation page so it can never be used as a category name - because that category name would by definition be ambiguous. Thanks. Le Deluge (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what the town is called - if there's at least two things with a reasonable claim to the same name, then normally that "obvious" name has to be a disambiguation and the two articles have to have a different name. See eg George Bush or Mercury. Obviously it helps if they are renamed in some fairly predictable way, and the general rule for disambiguating towns is that they have their province/state added to the name of the article (it gets a lot more complicated than that, but that's the usual starting point.) even if it may seem a bit "unnatural". See WP:Disambiguation and WP:Naming conventions (geographic names) for more details. Then there's a general rule that categories follow the names of the corresponding article - if the "simple" article name like Texcoco is ambiguous for the article, then it is also ambiguous for the categories. Now I understand that this isn't the most confusing disambiguation, in that all the alternatives, whether the lake or the historical entity are all in the same area - but can you accept that we need the "category follows article name" rule for "normal" cases (which are more like Mercury) and that it's easier for the marginal cases to just follow the same rule? In any case, you should never make big moves like that without discussion - and if you continue to do so you may find you get blocked from Wikipedia. Doing things by discussion and agreement is essential to how we work here. Le Deluge (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't see a particular problem with naming. As the article says, "The official name of the municipality is Texcoco and the official name of the city is Texcoco de Mora". So if we wanted a separate article on the city it could exist at Texcoco de Mora with no problem. Any uncertainty could be resolved using WP:Hatnotes. Just as a general bit of advice, I'd concentrate on making a really good article on the municipality rather than having lots of OK-ish articles on every community within it - for an idea of what makes "a really good article" see the guidelines at WP:Good article criteria and WP:Featured article criteria and examples at Category:FA-Class WikiProject Cities articles. As you may have noticed, I have done a really simple restructuring into the usual sections for a city article to guide it in the direction of what would be needed for GA/FA. It needs some copyediting and there's some sections that need expansion, notably sport, demographics, transport, media and notable people (! usually the problem is too many people...) as well as a WP:Manual of Style/Lead section that better summarises the whole article. Le Deluge (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

For clarity - I'm not saying don't have articles on the smaller communities. But my advice, based on quiet a lot of experience, would be to spend more time on making a really good article on the municipality first. It's a better use of your time, if your intention is to help your readers. For instance, I've spent some time on the municipality of Nottingham, population 318,900. Its article had 524,007 pageviews in 2016. Compare that with some of the communities within it - Radford, Nottingham has a population of 21,414 and 4,757 pageviews, Bilborough has a population of 16,792 and 3,003 pageviews. So Nottingham has 19x the population of Bilborough and 15x the population of Radford, but its article gets 174x and 67x the pageviews. That makes me think I should put 174x the energy into the municipality article compared to the Bilborough article. One can also imagine that the pageviews of Bilborough and Radford will be much higher on en.wiki than on other wikis, just because people live there - but tourists tend not to visit suburbs. You can see the language effect if you compare Nottingham and Texcoco - they are similar sized municipalities, but Nottingham got 524,007 pageviews and Texcoco got 14,337 pageviews. So you can imagine that the "Bilboroughs" of Texcoco will get <200 views per year. If I was you, I'd concentrate on giving the 14,337 people a really good article about the municipality, before worrying too much about the <200 people reading about the smaller communities. As an aside, Texcoco (altepetl) got 19,275 pageviews, more than the municipality.Le Deluge (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

To show the "tourist" effect - the only article I can find on es.wiki about Nottingham suburbs is es:Sneinton. On en.wiki, Nottingham gets 60x more pageviews than Sneinton, whereas on es.wiki Nottingham gets 414x more pageviews. Le Deluge (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Hidalgo

Thanks for the great info. I've actually been to that cemetery. Czolgolz (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Akapochtli (talk) 02:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Consecutive edits

Please consider using preview instead of making so many consecutive edits. You are making it difficult for other editors to navigate the article's revisions history. El_C 05:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thank you by this tip. Regards.--Marrovi (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

You're still doing it, this time on the talk page (10 edits for one comment, really?). Just use the preview button. Also, you must cease immediately from writing in Spanish without translating into English. This is the English Wikipedia and you are misusing the talk page. El_C 06:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Spanish is my mother language, I love my language, but I'm stay in English Wikipedia, thanks by this note.--Marrovi (talk) 02:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Marrovi

Yo se que es un poco tarde pero espero que no te haya afectado ni en lo más mínimo ese terremoto abrumador ni a tus seres queridos. Saludos de tu vecino latino. --186.151.61.100 (talk) 01:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amecameca Region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chalco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marrovi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Mezquital Valley ‎

It is different, but you are doing the same mistakes that you did in the spanish wikipedia, (i'm not point a complaint or denounce you, but you are doing the same mistakes). The long talks in English about Teotlalpan said the same it was not atribute region, thet wod was alredy elimitate for the introduction and thas ok. RubeHM (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

You are precisely making the same mistakes that got you blocked at the spanish wikipedia. You are making original research, creating articles that are not supoported by sources, and when confronted with the argument you behave problematically. You cannot for example remove a merge template untill there is a consensus that the article should or should not be merged. I will not waste much more time on this before I take it to some administrators who are unlikely to look favorably at your behavior given your known history of disruptive editing at other wikis.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 20:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Como les encanta el chisme y hacer leña del árbol caído, las personas faltas ética revuelven las cosas y le sacan provecho a los errores del pasado, con el único fin de atacar a las personas que les hace ver su error. Almenos nosotros en la UNAM no usamos tácticas tan sucias y tan bajas comos estos comentarios que me dejaron en mi talk, solo ustedes saben con que fin lo hicieron. Para nosotros los pumas, la ciencia no es un guerra política que intenta respaldar la necedad del adversario, es el surgimiento del conocimiento y la ruptura de los viejos paradigmas. Marrovi (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

El valle de México (Mexico Valley).

In this map, the municipalities of Apaxco, Hueypoxtla, Tequixquiac, Huehutoca and Zumpango no inside Mexico Valley, because the cultural issues and climate is diferent. Apaxco, Hueypoxtla, Tequixquiac, Huehuetoca and Zumpango are arid o desertic lands, the same climate in Mezquital Valley. In Mexico State no Natural regions as in Hidalgo State, the Mexico State only has got a strange administrative division (Tejupilco Region, Zumpango Region, Atlacomulco Region or Toluca Region).

The natural and cultural regions in Mexico State are Tierra Caliente (Tejupilco Region and a part of Ixtapan Region), Matlatzingo Valley (Toluca Valley), Mexico Valley (Naucalpan Region, Tlalnepantla Region, Ecatepec Region, Tultitlán Region, Texcoco Region, Chimalhuacan Region and Amecameca Region), Mezquital Valley (Zumpango Region and a part of Cuautitlán Izcalli Region), Mazahuahcan (Atlacomulco Region and Valle de Bravo Región), Tlahuicapan (Ixtapan Region) and Otomi Sierra (Lerma Region).

But in Mexico State, no Mezquital Valley now, only Teotlalpan Region in many documents ans research, the old name of Mezquital Valley. Mezquital Valley is only Hidalgo State. If you want to name to Mezquital Valley as Teotlalpan, you must to include Apaxco, Tequixquiac, Hueypoxtla, Zumpango, Coyotepec and Huehuetoca in Mezquital Valley, but doing that will be much more confusing and there will be more conflicts than having Teotlalpan separately as an independent article.Marrovi (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Marrovi....

Marrovi, deja en paz a maunus y a la gente de wikipedia. Ya has hecho bastante daño y bastante vandalismo e incluso has hecho llorar a un niño con Asperger. 37.15.238.59 (talk) 17:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)