User talk:WWGB: Difference between revisions
→New day at Deaths in 20xx: new section |
|||
Line 402: | Line 402: | ||
I assume you approve generally of my change to the FAQ about the date changing, and that you know more than I about how that date change happens. I assumed that a bot generated a new day at 00:00 UTC+14, but evidently not. Is it then a case of a bot does it sometime after 00:00, but it is unpredictable how soon, or is it manually changed? And is there any way of being either more precise or explaining the delay? Simply saying "after" that time could be many hours after. Or maybe it can be... [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 15:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC) |
I assume you approve generally of my change to the FAQ about the date changing, and that you know more than I about how that date change happens. I assumed that a bot generated a new day at 00:00 UTC+14, but evidently not. Is it then a case of a bot does it sometime after 00:00, but it is unpredictable how soon, or is it manually changed? And is there any way of being either more precise or explaining the delay? Simply saying "after" that time could be many hours after. Or maybe it can be... [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 15:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Wish == |
|||
Hello. Help improve article [[Maureen Wroblewitz]]. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/125.214.51.223|125.214.51.223]] ([[User talk:125.214.51.223|talk]]) 08:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:29, 20 August 2018
My Awards
Extended content
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI! THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK! JackGann (talk) 07:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Way to pounce! I went to do this exact edit a minute after you... stop reading my mind! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
My DYK
Extended content
| ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12 |
Fame at last...
How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. No mention of me though:). Nice diagrams, and a quick look at the page histories of shooting incidents will show a core of regular editors.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
HI WWGB, I'm a researcher at Sydney Uni and would like to contact you. I'm not sure how best to do this and hoping this message somehow reaches you....Doctor 17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Were you aware?
I assume that you have been made aware of this. But, in the event that you were not, I wanted to point it out to you and bring this to your attention. Your name was mentioned in this article: How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Reverting stabbing attacks edits without naming any reason
Please start discussion first before reverting my edits regarding the stabbing attacks. Reverting without real need and without naming any reason should be discussed first. --Angerdan (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- I suggest you control your exuberance and seek consensus before making profound changes. WWGB (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Just to do an extended clarify the reason of my editings (beyond the stated reasons in all of my edit summaries): Due to the increasing numbers of attacks, places aren't precise/unique enough anymore to describe the context of an article name. If you have any other idea, please tell it here or lets reverse your rollbacks withou edit summaries. My edits are objectively without subjective feelings. You did rollback the edits without creating an discussion first. Which brings you in the position of possibly starting an edit war. --Angerdan (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, YOU made significant edits without creating a discussion first. This is called WP:BRD. Now you go to each of the pages you want to move and start a discussion to justify that move. WWGB (talk) 12:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- I already justified my edits within the comments. But "When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed. Look at the article's history and its talk page to see if a discussion has begun. If not, you may begin one." is what you didn't.
- Also your reverts are against the guidelines of WP:Revert only when necessary. "You might discuss an edit on the talk page before reverting."
- So feel free to choose the articles you'd like to start an discussion. --Angerdan (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe the view from the category perspective gives you a hint about the usefulness of uniform names for several articles: Category:Stabbing attacks in Europe --Angerdan (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, YOU made significant edits without creating a discussion first. This is called WP:BRD. Now you go to each of the pages you want to move and start a discussion to justify that move. WWGB (talk) 12:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Just to do an extended clarify the reason of my editings (beyond the stated reasons in all of my edit summaries): Due to the increasing numbers of attacks, places aren't precise/unique enough anymore to describe the context of an article name. If you have any other idea, please tell it here or lets reverse your rollbacks withou edit summaries. My edits are objectively without subjective feelings. You did rollback the edits without creating an discussion first. Which brings you in the position of possibly starting an edit war. --Angerdan (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Devin Gray (American football), WWGB.
Unfortunately Joe Roe has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unsourced BLP
To reply, leave a comment on Joe Roe's talk page.
– Joe (talk) 13:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Seriously though, let's make peace and not war
I know I said I'll die on the hill of an uppercase title, but that was partially bluster. I'd rather we be friendly and understanding about this. Did you understand the part of the policy I quoted in the other part, and can you see how that's exactly the sort of title this guy held? It's fine if you can't, I guess, but just think about it a little more. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:13, June 27, 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Talkback
Message added 18:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
If you are ok with the reply, Kindly remove the RFC tag from the talk. If you would like to re-activate it just remove the nowiki tags. thanks. DBigXray 18:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
MasterChef Australia 1
Hello. Is there anything wrong with adding the reason Nic withdrew from the competition? 2602:306:3137:20B0:1462:21DE:F174:F107 (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thailand Cave Rescue
Why was death of ‘Richard Harris’ deleted? Chintan Kamani 14:39, 11 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckamani (talk • contribs)
Damn! That was my bad. Media reported it that way as if he died. My apologies. Chintan Kamani 14:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckamani (talk • contribs)
Team Names
I was looking at that IP edit too. Are sure about that revert? SlightSmile 11:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Slightsmile: They are unsourced edits to a list that is already sourced. Probably an issue with the transliteration of Thai names, but nevertheless needs to be sourced. WWGB (talk) 11:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Help with Thai Cave Rescue
Hi WWGB, I posted this question on another user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DonFB#Hi,_can_you_help_please?
Can you help by any chance? Apologies if this is in the wrong place to ask but you seem to know wikipedia inside out. Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historyguy1966 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Historyguy1966: Copy the cite below and paste it into the article at the desired place.
<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mahtani |first1=Shibani |title=‘He loved them more than himself’: How a 25-year-old former monk kept the Thai soccer team alive |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/he-loved-them-more-than-himself-how-a-25-year-old-former-monk-kept-the-thai-soccer-team-alive/2018/07/07/b4100076-815e-11e8-b3b5-b61896f90919_story.html |work=The Washington Post |date=7 July 2018}}</ref>
WWGB (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historyguy1966 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Hoda Kobeissi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoda Kobeissi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoda Kobeissi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 06:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoda Kobeissi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balmain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Crawlies
This is where I show off my ignorance. That cave is deep in the tropics. I'm surprised that no one - the kids crawling through tight spaces in the beginning etc didn't encounter crawly things venomous or otherwise. I remember seeing an interview Michael J Fox talking about how they had to hire a "snake beater" to chase off cobras when they were shooting a film in the jungle there. SlightSmile 10:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- If the issue has not been reported in reliable sources then we have no reason to consider it. WWGB (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I wasn't thinking putting that in any article otherwise I would have brought this to the article talk. I was just curious about the crawly things and took a chance asking you what you know about that kind of thing. Sorry if I'm being a bore, I do that sometimes. I find myself being so blown away by that cave rescue - wow! SlightSmile 12:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello WWGB, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Poh Ling Yeow
Done GiantSnowman 07:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
New day at Deaths in 20xx
I assume you approve generally of my change to the FAQ about the date changing, and that you know more than I about how that date change happens. I assumed that a bot generated a new day at 00:00 UTC+14, but evidently not. Is it then a case of a bot does it sometime after 00:00, but it is unpredictable how soon, or is it manually changed? And is there any way of being either more precise or explaining the delay? Simply saying "after" that time could be many hours after. Or maybe it can be... Kevin McE (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Wish
Hello. Help improve article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thank you. 125.214.51.223 (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)