User talk:Andrewaskew: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:26, 6 September 2018

Archives

1

Tip of the moment...

Becoming an Administrator

Administrators, commonly known as admins or sysops (system operators), are Wikipedia editors who have been granted the technical ability to perform certain special actions on the English Wikipedia, including the ability to block and unblock user accounts and IP addresses from editing, edit fully protected pages, protect and unprotect pages from editing, delete and undelete pages, rename pages without restriction, and use certain other tools.

They are never required to use their tools, and must never use them to gain an advantage in a dispute in which they are involved.

Admins are selected by the Wikipedia community at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship through an often grueling review process. Go there if you would like to nominate someone to be an admin (including yourself).

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conceptual model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concurrency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Andrewaskew (talk) 22:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Omega-level mutants

Given your interest at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 January 1, you may want to add Nate Grey, Mister M, Quentin Quire and Hope Summers at Mutant_(Marvel_Comics)#Omega-level_mutants if this can be justified. – Fayenatic London 19:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of metafictional works, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sigil and Mike Carey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Andrewaskew (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetised categories

Please, stop mass changing of order of category tags in articles unless your intention got approval of a reasonable number of editors. Please, notice existence of this script and this discussion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply) Andrewaskew (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mediate

As a participant in WikiProject Alternative Views I invite you to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcha Faal (2nd nomination)[1]. For an entity such as this who has gained global noterity to even be considered for deletion is beyond my understanding.Kmt885 (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contributed. But perhaps not as Kmt885 was hoping. Andrewaskew (talk) 06:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sockpuppet (Internet) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illusive Man RfC

You have replies at Talk:Illusive Man#Request_for_comment. czar · · 06:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied and again. --Andrewaskew (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Last of Us

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Last of Us. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your continuing contribution at Sockpuppet-- John Foxe (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

If you really believe there is a consensus about including this BLP-related defamatory information, please ask for official closure of RfC discussion at Wikipedia:AN#Requests_for_closure. I did not do it only because I am sure there is no consensus based on the "head count" (3:2 excluding you as someone who originally placed this information and started RfC) and the sake of the argument. Thanks, My very best wishes (talk) 20:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. My very best wishes (talk) 13:55, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And that was your response? My very best wishes (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an interesting essay... My very best wishes (talk) 03:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tongue in cheek, but clever. I hope you are not saying that this is somehow relevant to our current discussion.

I read your announcement, I hope you have a good trip. Andrewaskew (talk) 04:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I do not mind informal discussion. I insist on exclusion of this material from this article because I read books by these historians, I found their work great, and I do believe the scandal should not be mentioned anywhere, unless this is absolutely necessary for the sake of the article (and ultimately the encyclopedia), but it is not. What I have here is a genuine BLP concern. But what is your motivation? I found it hard to believe that you struggle for the sake of encyclopedia because this particular example is not essential for this article, and arguably does not belong there at all (depending on definition of sockpuppetry). Just to win a content dispute? My very best wishes (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also don't mind a nice informal discussion. I'd much rather settle the matter in a nice civilised way than with an argument, some of the arguments on Wikipedia are truly ridiculous, but c'est la vie.

My motivation is to ensure the best version of the article Sockpuppet. As an editor, I prefer to work on abstract concerns: definitional issues, categorisation, scepticism, and especially humanities & media. I rather not get involved with biographies, simply because BLP issues seem to produce some of the fiercest arguments. (Not that I think BLP is unimportant.) What BLP means outside of biographies is that we cannot report anything that is improperly sourced or irrelevant to the matter at hand.

In this matter, the facts of the Figes case are important to illustrate sockpuppetry. While a raw definition is important, examples are also important to help readers to understand the matter. Furthermore, a list of examples provides a good jumping off point for readers looking to explore the issue further. We cannot, and should not, say anything more that what is said by our sources. We must use the sources for proper constuction of the article. We are not here to praise nor condemn, we let the facts speak for themselves, and leave it up to our readers to decide.

Ultimately, I struggle because I believe in Wikipedia. Just as the vandalism patrol is vital, so to is it vital for the long-term health and reputation of the Wikimedia project that pages not be decided by personal issues and bias. As we move in to a new phase, and a new generation of editors, these things become more and more important.

Happy editing. --Andrewaskew (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, you simply continue to insist that material about the scandal is extremely important to illustrate what sockpuppet is. However, I think it does not belong to the article at all (irrelevant as you said below) because it does not satisfy the most common definition of sockpuppetry. This is our disagreement. Unlike you, I have very low regard to Wikipedia (please see Official Disclaimer) and continue editing here only because I think this is still a useful, although heavily misused resource, and also because of my addiction. Honestly, I talked about Wikipedia with a number of my colleagues, and none of them held high regard for this place, whereas my closest and most important scientific collaborator demanded that I stopped editing here immediately, and for a number of very good reasons. My another colleague suggested to remove links from our new database to wikipedia as "unprofessional", and that is what we did after some discussion. Good luck, My very best wishes (talk) 05:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a very high regard for Wikipedia, not because I think it is flawless, but perhaps because I am an optimist. I think that Wikipedia's (and humankind's) nature is revealed not in its failures, but in its successes. Ultimately Wikipedia can never be perfect, but by our actions we can make it a little better than yesterday. And on, and on. I can understand the position of your colleagues, but Wikipedia and academe serve slightly different purposes, even if both aim at the improvement of knowledge. Wikipedia involves the masses in education, it serves as an entry point to further research, it answers idle speculations. In short, Wikipedia does the job of an encyclopædia.

So I urge you to continue to edit. Keep faith in the project. It is only by the work of great editors that Wikipedia can continue to become what it can be. --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The argument on chi force and Star Wars

Hello Andrew, my name is Jacob, And i want to be a little brief on some thing's between the two forces.

Now i have had a lot of conversations between chi and other mystical forces and how they are different. And i see you are a believer in Buddhism and the occult, but lets get to the very bottom. Lets start off with Star Wars, i want to bring to your very attention that the forces in Star Wars is based on supernatural events and not the force of nature. I will describe the forces, okay, you notice how "telekinesis" is mostly used in Star Wars, it is used by the top classes of Jedi including Yoda and Darth Vader and Luke Sky Walker, etc. Clearly some of you didn't quite understand what Yoda was saying in reference to Luke Sky Walker. When Yoda was saying to Luke, "Use the force around you Luke". He didn't met the force of nature, he met the force of "matter", i want you to clearly understand this. He met to use the force of matter by the influence of his mind, not nature not life force or Qi. He met "mind over matter of super consciousness". Now as for chi or Qi on the other hand, is unalike mind over matter. Chi is a physical power of inner force or inner strength, not the supernatural or mystical events. This is why some people and even my self get confused and frustrated on mystical forces and powers. I can't seem to understand why, why is that chi come in to place of everything in definition of "energy". I don't understand why, and I've been crying out loud on this subject for a long time. If you have any other opinions or preparations for this. Please start with this one, God bless.

--Jacob Merrill (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied) --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Race and intelligence

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Race and intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One of your Book links is now a redirect.

Hello. Seeing a Mini_dental_implants (MDI) section in the Dental implant article, and a redirect at Mini dental implants (since it seems the articles were merged this summer) I went to the MDI page's What Links Here to clean up some links to that redirect page. As your User:Andrewaskew/Books/Medical Equipment links to both articles, I thought to let you know in case you might wish to remove your MDI link. --Egmonster (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vitalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In his book "Kinds of Minds", philosopher [[Daniel Dennett]] wrote, "Dualism...and Vitalism (the view that living things contain some special physical but equally mysterious stuff—élan vital—

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falsification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Eastern Front (World War II)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eastern Front (World War II). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Union of South Africa

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Union of South Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Dialectic of Sex

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Dialectic of Sex. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Yamanoue no Okura

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Yamanoue no Okura. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Euromaidan

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Euromaidan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polyamorous people

Category:Polyamorous people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 21:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Dimensionaut

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dimensionaut. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Morphology

Category:Morphology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Media manipulation may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Media issues|Manipulation]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Collective consciousness

Hi, please would you review Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Collective consciousness and tidy the category pages to remove the unnecessary red links? – Fayenatic London 23:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:September 11 attacks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:September 11 attacks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrewaskew, thank you for your feedback on the RfC. I am writing to let you know that I completely revised the second sentence in the proposed paragraph, and I think it might address some of your concerns. If you have time, could you come by and take another look? Thanks. Smitty121981 (talk) 16:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox television

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox television. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Kosovo municipalities

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Kosovo municipalities. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Billy Mackenzie

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Billy Mackenzie. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)

Hello, I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:History of Scotland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Scotland. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:History of Slovakia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Slovakia. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Russian Winter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian Winter. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Murder of Anni Dewani

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Murder of Anni Dewani. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Jewish Israeli stone throwing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jewish Israeli stone throwing. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bias, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Observer and Product. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Yugoslavia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yugoslavia. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Alienation (EP)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alienation (EP). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Donetsk People's Republic

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donetsk People's Republic. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An other CfR discussion for US city categories

There's a new Categories for Renaming discussion going on about categories of US cities listed in the AP Stylebook. As you have participated in at least one of the more recent discussions in the subject, you may want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 17#Seattle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrewaskew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Barcade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Barcade. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie (talk) 18:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Galkayo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Galkayo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Philosopher's Stone (album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Philosopher's Stone (album). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrewaskew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Buffalo, New York

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Buffalo, New York. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Esplanade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Esplanade. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:White House Correspondents' Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White House Correspondents' Association. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issue involvement listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Issue involvement. Since you had some involvement with the Issue involvement redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We need your input! Request for Comment - Including China's stance on Hamas

Your name was found on Feedback request service Politics, government, and law. Please join the discussion here and give your needed opinion on whether to include China's position concerning Hamas. Thanks! Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 329: / Line 329: @@
 The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran#rfc_35CBC4D|this request for comment on '''Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 93457 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
+== We need your input! Request for Comment - Including China's stance on Hamas  ==
+Your name was found on [[Wikipedia:Feedback_request_service#Politics,_government,_and_law|Feedback request service Politics, government, and law]].
+Please join the [[Talk:Hamas#Request_for_Comment_-_Including_China's_stance_on_Hamas_in_the_lead|discussion here]] and give your needed opinion on whether to include China's position concerning [[Hamas]]. Thanks!  [[User:Veritycheck|Veritycheck✔️]] ([[User talk:Veritycheck|talk]]) 16:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)