Jump to content

User talk:VenusFeuerFalle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 342: Line 342:


== German to English ==
== German to English ==
Request translation: [[:de:Jakob Schmid (Pedell)]] ([[Jakob Schmid]]), [[:de:Henning von Thadden]] ([[Henning von Thadden]]). Thank you. --[[Special:Contributions/79.54.23.199|79.54.23.199]] 16:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Request translation: [[:de:Henning von Thadden]] ([[Henning von Thadden]]). Thank you. --[[Special:Contributions/79.54.23.199|79.54.23.199]] 16:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
::I have done the first article by know (Franz J. Müller). Since this is not my favorite topic, there are some words, I do not use in English frequently (not even in German), such as pamphleta (to be honest, I never heard or read it, before). Nevertheless, I hope it helps you. If you find grammar mistakes or some phrasing, what could be improved, be bolt and improve it. But I think the content this is about is clear.--[[User:VenusFeuerFalle|VenusFeuerFalle]] ([[User talk:VenusFeuerFalle#top|talk]]) 20:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
::I have done the first article by know (Franz J. Müller). Since this is not my favorite topic, there are some words, I do not use in English frequently (not even in German), such as pamphleta (to be honest, I never heard or read it, before). Nevertheless, I hope it helps you. If you find grammar mistakes or some phrasing, what could be improved, be bolt and improve it. But I think the content this is about is clear.--[[User:VenusFeuerFalle|VenusFeuerFalle]] ([[User talk:VenusFeuerFalle#top|talk]]) 20:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
:::Can you translate also these two? --[[Special:Contributions/95.232.38.195|95.232.38.195]] 15:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
:::Can you translate also these two? --[[Special:Contributions/95.232.38.195|95.232.38.195]] 15:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:51, 27 May 2019

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi VenusFeuerFalle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:49, Saturday, December 3, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi VenusFeuerFalle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:49, Saturday, December 3, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

AfC notification: Draft:Hinn (Islam) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hinn (Islam). Thanks! Wikirictor (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hinn (Islam) has been accepted

Hinn (Islam), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 TT me 18:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Islam, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adhan
added a link pointing to Turkish
Islamic view of angels
added a link pointing to Persian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic view of angels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jann (legendary creature) has been accepted

Jann (legendary creature), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 14:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic view of angels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qazwini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please see Help:Footnotes to learn how to correctly add a reference. Thank you. Samsara 00:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gnosticism

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle – I saw your recent edit to Gnosticism, and I read it with interest. Although I have some interest in the topic of Gnosticism, I don't know enough about the subject matter to know whether the added material is appropriate for the article or not. Other editors will be certain to review your edit and determine that. However, I notice quite a few mistakes in the material you added, mostly spelling mistakes, but a few verb forms, and one or two unclear spots. I'm willing to help you get the prose into better shape, but I'm wondering whether it might be a good idea for you to remove what you added, at least temporarily, and place it in your sandbox (see the tab all the way at the top of your user or talk page), which is a kind of work space. I'll correct the errors in spelling and verb form first; then I'll point out the unclear spots and ask you what you are trying to say and help formulate a clear phrase or sentence. If you think this would be a good idea, just revert your own edit, include an edit summary saying "Reverting own edit to work on prose", or something like that, and copy and paste all of it to your sandbox. Then let me know that you've done that, and I'll look at the material again. Once we have it in good shape, you can add it again, and then see what happens. If you really don't want to undo your edit, just let me know and I'll correct errors with my own edits, and ask you about unclear spots in comments on your talk page. Best regards,  – Corinne (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message on my talk page telling me you had moved the material to your sandbox. I'll look at it now. I'd just like to add a reminder to sign your posts (comments) with four tildes: ~~~~. Best regards,  – Corinne (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC) I just realized that in order for me to be able to access your sandbox, you need to provide a link to it. I think it's first "User", followed by a colon, then your user name, then a forward slash (/), and finally the word "sandbox". I found a page that has a little information about sandboxes: Help:My sandbox.  – Corinne (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link doesn't work. Maybe we can edit it here. I already tried to fix some issues on my own, but unsure, about it's accuracy.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gnostic thoughts found their way into Islam during the early medieval age. The Quran and Islamic Anthopogenetic (can this be used in religous usage?) share gnostic ideas and reapear especially among Sufi, Shia and Ismaili traditions. However, acording to Islamics beleif in strict Oneness of God, there was no room for a lower deity; the demiurge, althought, some early writings and exegesis stated, Iblis as the ruler over the lower heavens and earths. Especially in the "Um-al Kitab" Azazel resembles the gnostic demiurge. Like the demiurge, he is endowed with the ability to create his own world and seeks to imprison human in the material world, but here, his power is limited and depents on the higher God. Like the gnostic conception of human being imprisoned in matter, Islam aknowledges the human soul is a accomplice of the material world and subject to bodily desires similiar to the archontic spheres envelop the pneuma. The Ruh must therefore gain victory over the lower and material-bound psyche, to overcome his animalic nature. A human captured by his animalic desires, mistakenly claim autonomy and independency from the "higher God", thus resembling the lowr deitiy in classical gnostic traditions.

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle – Before I begin to correct the many spelling errors, I'd like to ask you if this material is sourced. It's got to be either a direct quote (in which case we'd have to put it in quotation marks or as a blockquote) or a paraphrase, but either way it has to be sourced. Do you have citations ready to add? If this represents your own thinking on the topic, that would constitute WP:Original research, so would not be acceptable in the article. Miniapolis, just for future reference, can you tell us how to create a link to VenusFeuerFalle's sandbox?  – Corinne (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The link to VenusFeuerFalle's sandbox is User:VenusFeuerFalle/sandbox. Have fun and all the best, Miniapolis 00:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References are not included in my talkpage but in my sandbox. I thought, given the sources here, would make it confusing.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. That's fine. Since we now have a link to your sandbox, I think it would be best if I make the corrections there. If you don't mind, I'd rather wait until tomorrow.  – Corinne (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demonology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jinn, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yemeni and Soothsayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Islamic Barnstar
Your article creations and content additions on important Islamic topics are much appreciated brother. Keep the good work up !!! Resnjari (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samum (Islam)

The article Samum (Islam) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Term appears either non-notable or made-up. Does not Google, does not Wiktionary, does not appear on anything. Also, half of the article prose promotes a film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (t,c,l) 10:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.britannica.com/science/simoom it can be written Samum or Simoom. The film is in line with a common belief in Islamic mythology, however they are created from Samum/Simoom here instead of called that way. Thought it could clearify that "fires of Simoom" mean in Islamic literature, but in the meanwhile I think, we could simply make notes, then refering to "fires of Simoom" in other articles.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinn (mythology), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Titan and Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad in the Bible

I'm not sure what you're attempting to do with this edit, but that doesn't work. I've reverted you. Can you explain? --Hammersoft (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I do not understand your accusations. I thought this category would have a better overview if they are not all listed under "M" for Muhammad, since there are many articles starting with "Muhammad". If others disagree, I do not care, but wanted to make sure all this categories are listened equal. --VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • (signed for you) First, let's get more collegial. I'm not accusing you of anything. Second, I see what you're doing, and I'm 50/50 on it. It doesn't make much of a difference really in this case what order the category displays in. On the other hand, if it ever did get larger, I could see why categorizing like that may be helpful. If you really think it would be helpful now, proceed ahead (you don't need my permission certainly), just as you suggested in reverse, make sure it's done to all of them. All the best, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, than sorry for misinterpretating you.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • No worries. I certainly don't have the capabilities of expression that Nietzsche had :) (ref; your userboxes) --Hammersoft (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be more clear; I wasn't seeing initially how it was making a difference. I was comparing versions and not seeing a layout difference, not realizing that versions don't differentiate on categorization when it's done like that. My stupidity. Bleah. Everyday can be a Monday, you just have to fail harder ;) --Hammersoft (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thats right, you literaly do not see this change. I thought it was a rhetorical question like "I do not see, that you are doing here but I will keep an eye on you" and I did not understand, that I had done wrong xD

Ok nice, that we have solved this misunderstanding :)

Thanks, hope you have a great day as well :)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadith of Najd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibn Hajar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on Page Ownership. Thank you. — MusenInvincible (talk) 13:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jahannam. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

I reverted your changes, not because I disagree with them (I neither agree or disagree - I have no opinion), but because in the dispute that has arisen, BoogaLouie has rightly opened discussion on the talk page. Dorsetonian (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dorsetonian. thanks for your effort. Actually I always try to talk to the user I repeatedly revert, even invited him to discuss it on a talkpage, however the User does not talk to me back, but accuse me of "Side-owning" (that I not do and I tried to explain) and loomed to call an admin without any openness for discussion.VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's your purpose?

Islamic mythology? What is it? The term doesn't make sense. Islam is against both myths and superstitions. Maybe you didn't get the meaning of mythology. Don't waste your time like that. Obviously this is just an advice. The Almighty has given free will to us. It's up to you how to use your time.

May The Lord give you hidayat. --2.97.1.144 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok because I see your question is serious, I will answer you. I mean the whole concept of beliefs in relation with Islam and Islamic culture, including angels, jinn, demons, the miraj, cultural practises and so on. This does not mean, that it is unreal I do not judge about it (here on Wikipedia). I guess I also wrote it above in the meanwhile. That Isla is against superstitions ccan be read from the Quran yes, but others do it not. This is also something, that should be mentioned. For example some Muslims in the Middle Ages gave psychological explanations for Jinn-sightings. I think all of this should be provided by a world-encyclopedia and not just certain exegesis, which some writers themselves beliefs to be true.

Regarding your user page

Hi. Maybe you should read WP:PARAGRAPH. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinker78 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J. Douglas Kenyon, Atlantis Rising, is not a reliable source

It's fringe and fails WP:RS. You can always check at WP:RSN. One of its authors for instance is Frank Joseph. I'm removing it, hope you don't mind. Doug Weller talk 14:47, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shedim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undone newly added category in "Category:Jinn"

Hello VenusFeuerFalle, since you had written in the reversion of my edit in "Category:Jinn" that you would be interested in the motives of my adding another category, here I am now to explain. In the last days and weeks I have taken the task upon me to reorganize and complete the categories concerning legendary creatures by culture (see "Category:Legendary creatures by culture" and its sub-categories). The reason for this is that I myself tend to read through legendary creatures articles by browsing through the aforementioned kind of categories which I often found to be unorganized or incomplete. As such I thought that Jinn as legendary creatures of Islamic culture (or, as implemented by another user afterwards, of Arabian culture (see "Category:Arabian legendary creatures"; article history here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AJinn&type=revision&diff=858534505&oldid=858533613) should also be found if specifically looking for legendary creatures by culture. So I added "Category:Islamic legendary creatures" to the already present categories for coverage of cultural origin. This was my motivation by adding this category.--Tarchunes (talk) 09:00, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer @Tarchunes: Now I would like to know how we hadnle the "demon in Islam section". Before "Jinn" was limited to the "basic-tentes" in Islam. Some Jinn didn't appeared in "orthodox Islam" as such like the Ghoul (who is even refused in one hadith) but now, sine the article started to extent and the Jinn article itselfs starts to explain "jinn" in the broader meaning in Islamic culture (there is the Ghoul indeed present), it makes sense to me, to add the "jinn-category", to the "Islamic legendary-creatures". Now the "Demons in Islam" are a sub-category, with many jinn overlaping such as "Ifrit" and "Iblis". That do you think we should proceed? I see two options. We could remove the "demons in Islm" as subcategory, (especially since some of them are not even Jinn, such as Azazel and Hinn), but then, there would be still many overlappings, since some are both jinn and demons (such as the Ifrit and the Marid) indeed. Otherweise, we could get rid of overlapping gactegories by leaving "demons in Islam" as a sub- for "Jinn", but removing those who are already mentioned in the "demons"-category. Thank you for your efforts.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 16:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think its true that the "Category:Demons in Islam" as sub-category of "Category:Jinn" can be somewhat problematic since in English "demons" isn't exclusively used only for devils (shaitan in Islam) but also for all kinds of legendary creatures with hostility in regard to humans but not being infernal demons per se. As such I'd likely remove the sub-category about demons and additionally add all those demons who are categorized as jinn to the corresponding category as well. Additionally, I believe to have read - if I remember correctly - that according to Islamic mythology the angels were created from the light of fire, the devils from the smoke of fire and the jinn from the substance of fire itself. As such, even if some jinn can secondarily become demons (such as Iblis) I'd rather keep demons and jinn apart for they are basically different legendary creatures.--Tarchunes (talk) 10:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, such categorization exist within Islamic mythology. So I am going to re-categorize the jinn and the demons now? If you find any deficits, don't midn to correct it, but please leave a short explanation. Thank you.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 11:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jinn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sorcery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work on Fallen Angels

I just wanted to say, great work on the fallen angels article. It's really shaping up to be quite good!--Ermenrich (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you like it. I hope this article would had already been reviewed. But it seems I will need to make further edits for it. But it may be finally a good article and it is such a central point in abrahamic theology, this topic deserves to be accurate.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Darkness (Manichaeism) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Prince of Darkness (Manichaeism), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering(t) 21:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I am sorry, I accidently hit the "save" button.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Typos

Hi, I noticed a few typos in your user page (trying to be helpful here, not critical!) - "Thus, I you think my edits are inapprociate" should be "Thus, if you think my edits are inappropriate" and "the many contributations" should be "the many contributions" - thanks for you many valuable contributions - Epinoia (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wow I did this typoeven twice. It hurts on the mouth to pronounce it like tha, haha. Thank you very much for your advise. If you find even more (thtat probably are) typos, you are free to edit it as long there is no content change.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 23:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fallen angel

Hi VenusFeuerFalle, Thanks to your contributions to the fallen angel article! A good religion article is hard to find. I am not planning on reviewing the article, but I did want to tell you that if you want the article to pass, you should probably add info to it about the portrayal of fallen angels in literature, film, music, etc. You should definitely discuss Paradise Lost in the article.

Have a nice day, MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Thank you for your advise. I once retreated Miltons Paradise Lost, just like I did for the Zohar. I hoped I could avoid it, but it very likely should be mentioned here, But I finally included the Zohar here, I will try to find good sources for Milton (I once found some but not enough for me to add them here). I am glad you obviously like the article. Have a nice day too--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sijjin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Razi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkic mythology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pantheon and Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Prince of darkness (Manichaeism)

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle,

Thanks for creating Prince of darkness (Manichaeism)! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The article uses a lot of terms that will be unfamiliar to readers that aren't well-trained in theology, particularly in the "Polytheism and Dualism" dection.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 23:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rosguill:, nice to meet you too. I was busy the last weeks, so I didn't reply yet. I want to edit the article again and you tell me, if it becomes more clear, if you want :)--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fallen angel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fallen angel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The review is here.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fallen angel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fallen angel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Venus, there are new comments on the review page. Please take a look and make appropriate adjustments to the article.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I did not checked my Wiki-account yesterday, due to illness. But I feel better today and will check it up. Thanks for your advise--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Athari

The term athari seems to have gained currency among English-speaking Muslims, but a systematic source review in Talk:Traditionalist_theology_(Islam)#Source_review showed that it's not a term widely used in English-language RSs, which is why the article has the name that it does. In fact, last time I checked, I could find only two academic books using it. We need to revert your change on Sunni Islam, also because the rest of the section was written around the more common term. Eperoton (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What surpirsed me, since I thought that "Traditionalists" would be the less academic term. I mean it sounds like Atharis would be closer to traditions, than Maturidi and Ashari (that at least is not the case for Maturidi, who can be linked to Hanafa). I recently read about Atharis (one time in Wikipedia about Ibn Kathir) and now by searching for Maturidi Creed. But that was rather accidental. Thank you for clearing me up.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I don't like the term "traditionalist". For a lay reader, it's likely to cause confusion between the intended technical meaning ("tradition" as translation of "hadith") and the common meaning (contrasted with untraditional). However, we have to follow the prevalent usage in RSs. Eperoton (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, same here. But it is not up to us (unfortunetaly).--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV template

Hello VenusFeuerFalle, I noticed that you have been adding POV tags to sections in the Hindu-Islamic relations article. Please read the instructions at template:POV for using the template. In particular, it is very important to initiate a talk page discussion first. Also, please be specific about the issues you want to raise. Vague references like "the source" do not clarify to the other editors what you are talking about. Best regards, Kautilya3 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, after your revert I added a discussion on the talkpage. I do not remeber to say "the source", but that I sayed something like "the following primary source", since there is one specific I gues it is clear, that I meant. If I had the time, I would also rwrite the section on myself, but there are still some other issues on other articles, I think that should be fixed. With best regards--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed, thank you. If you are interested in pursuing the issues further, the cattle slaughter in India article has a much more erudite presentation of the issues. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes thank you. If I had time, I would look into further detail. I hoped afte the tag, someone else could be encouraged to investigate the topic further, especially since some parts are not sourced or so misleading one could call them wrong. It is also missing certain important details, for example the Brahmins, and who exactly is allowed to eat meat, who not, how and why for hinduism. I left a note on the talkpage, but I want finnaly edit the Islamic mythology section, I am waiting for this some months ago but always did something else.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fallen angel

The article Fallen angel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fallen angel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fallen angel

On 21 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fallen angel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Church Fathers such as Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, and Lactantius accepted the association of the angelic descent myth with the "sons of God" passage in Genesis 6? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fallen angel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fallen angel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

German to English

Request translation: de:Henning von Thadden (Henning von Thadden). Thank you. --79.54.23.199 16:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the first article by know (Franz J. Müller). Since this is not my favorite topic, there are some words, I do not use in English frequently (not even in German), such as pamphleta (to be honest, I never heard or read it, before). Nevertheless, I hope it helps you. If you find grammar mistakes or some phrasing, what could be improved, be bolt and improve it. But I think the content this is about is clear.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you translate also these two? --95.232.38.195 15:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reminder. I actually forgot it, I am sorry. I will try it, but the next days there is many stuff to do for me in private. I hope it is not urgent, so I would translate them within the next two weeks if it is okay for you.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. --95.233.3.50 14:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I translated the article for Jakob Schmid. Again, there are some Jura-related words I do not know the proper English counterpart. But I guess it suffices.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 11:21, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prince of Darkness (Manichaeism)

Hello, VenusFeuerFalle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prince of Darkness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VenusFeuerFalle&oldid=899002528"