User talk:Praxidicae

Hi

why have you suggested the speedly deletion of the article kidatz i wounder why, there is no need for deletion because it does not violates any copyrights thank you

If you bothered to read the deletion notice, you'd see why. Also please avoid making edits while logged out. Praxidicae (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

ok what is wrong on the article

I see you are seriously suggesting the deletion for the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.249.102.48 (talk) 14:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Conversight.ai

Just a courtesy note to let you know I've declined your speedy tag at Conversight.ai. The article was borderline, and I can see why you tagged it as G11, but I don't think the level of promotion quite rises to the level of unambiguous advertising, and there are some good sources there so I think it may be salvageable. If you want to take it to AFD, feel free. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Gratitude

Weeks ago I had what seemed like a misunderstanding with you which ended in me almost losing my cool if not actually losing it. But since that day I learnt an imperative lesson & even became a better editor. I may have disagreed with your tone but in the end it did assist me a lot & for that I say thank you.Celestina007 (talk) 17:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

A very Arturo Christmas

Holiday username recommended by Drmies here is now been created.

❤ So, now I can formally wish you an excellent holidays with loved ones and Wikipedian friends, Drmies and T.Baloney. @Drmies and TonyBallioni: --A very Arturo Christmas (talk) 23:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks. Since when is Tony a good guy? And why can't you send me a regular postcard or email message, so we can talk like old friends? And if you could stop fucking around with the people you don't like... Just leave them alone, and walk a different path. Take it easy. Drmies (talk) 00:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Healthway Medical Corporation Limited

Hi,

The revised draft for Healthway Medical is strictly in accordance to Wikipedia's editorial guidelines. All the information that previously may OR may not have highlighted point of conflict and/or direct association to the organisation has been removed. Added more relevant and authentic sources to base the information provided in the document. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Bilal Memon (talk • contribs) 09:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your recent help with the hijinks on Pratham Singh's article. Thank you! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Cheers

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true. No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well P. MarnetteD|Talk 05:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Pump Citation

Hi Praxidicae

Please accept my apologies, I thought I was adding a valid citation in order to slightly improve the article. I must have been mistaken. I certainly am not affiliated to any company that was linked to.

Kind regards Rogue2030 (talk) 10:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Xmas!

Merry Christmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

James The Bond 007 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please take a peek at

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Inappropriate_copyS Philbrick(Talk) 18:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

heya. It’s a global vanity spammer. Praxidicae (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Revert back to previous edit on Claude Vonstroke

hello, you've hit undo to all of the changes that I made to Claude Vonstroke's page and I wanted to know if this is because you think there is a conflict of interest? I stated on the talk page that I was hired to update his page and on my account profile, it states that I am paid by all of the pages I contribute to. Please let me know what other issues there are so that we can reinstate the edition that was approved by mgmt Runawaytonight (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

You must disclose properly but you need to request changes and refrain from making them directly. Praxidicae (talk) 20:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

what is disclosing properly? I posted that i was hired in the talk page before I started making changes. Can you reinstate my revision while this is sorted? Thank you Runawaytonight (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Per our COI policies and guidelines you need to be requesting changes via the talk page. Not making them yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

okay, but what haven't I disclosed? Runawaytonight (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

@Runawaytonight: Praxidicae was merely stating that it is proper to disclose, as you have. The more important part of what they said is that you absolutely cannot be making direct edits to the articles you are associated with. Adding a disclaimer to your userpage does not give you permission to edit such articles, the disclosure is merely required for you to be allowed to even discuss these articles and to edit any other part of our site (not including the article's you are associated with, as we just said that is not allowed ever). — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Jason Criddle

Hi Praxidicae, I saw your message and that's why I decided to contact you. First and foremost, I'm new here and I'm even only trying my best to navigate the pages well. I have no relationship with this man in question and I don't know why all of you are insinuating all this. I just want to contribute to the community - that's all. I think the reason why all of you are saying that is because of the edits I made. In the message I received earlier, I was redirected to "creating my first page" and after reading through I got to understand that I have to keep the tone neutral to make it encyclopaedic which I'm completely oblivion of. I read about this man on the internet and I decided to contribute to Wikipedia by writing about him.

Again, as regards the edits, I have no idea its wrong to edit a page that has been tagged for speedy deletion. I thought by rewriting it, I will be able to make the necessary amendments and resolve the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessing Adewale (talk • contribs) 15:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Please explain how you took this photo of him if you have no connection Praxidicae (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Vicky Kadian (1998)

Hi, I noticed you tagged this under two separate criteria, those being WP:G4 and WP:G5. G5 is for creations by blocked or banned people in violation of their block or ban, by which I assume you think Dev4052 is someone's sock puppet. However, they aren't blocked, there is no warning on their talk page, and I don't see any SPI investigations naming them as a potential sockpuppet. Can you clarify why you think G5 is appropriate? Thanks. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 20:14, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm aware and I'm not going to warn a serial vanity spammer. Please see this user. Praxidicae (talk) 20:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

And for the record the only reason it doesn't indicate one of the 5+ afds this has gone through is because Twinkle doesn't allow those fields when you use db-multi. Praxidicae (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the link to the sock master. I see there is an investigation open. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 20:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

STOP!!!

It was a test, and please don't bud into my business, because I find you very annoying! --Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @James the Bond 007: It's not "your" business, it's "our" business, because Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopaedia. If you wish to make test edits, the sandbox is thataway. Nominating multiple articles (Including a featured article) for deletion cannot really be described as anything other than significantly disruptive behaviour.

Looking through your edit history, and your frankly bizzare behaviour towards Praxidicae, I think you need a serious attitude adjustment if you're planning to stick around here: Stay off people's talk pages and put some time and energy into contributing to the encyclopaedia. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 14:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

please

all I ask of you is to stop interacting with me, because I am starting to not like this, this is the reason why I have been adopted. --Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Make accusations with information!!!

I was blocked as a suspected sock, not because of these incidents! --Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Say what!

I didn't delete any info from the notice board, could the edit conflict message have any thing to do with this ?--Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

You did, here.

If that was unintentional, such as an edit conflict, then you need to be more careful. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

P45 Day???

Why have you replaced my new page "P45 day" with a redirect to the "P45" disambiguation age?

In doing so, I think you've missed the point of the new page. "P45 day" is not meant to discuss the "P45" leaving work form, but a nickname given to a day said to see more people face disciplinary action at work due to trouble they get themselves into on "BLack Eye Friday", when people traditionally go drinking (too much) on the last Friday at work before Christmas in the UK.

My new page had already been reviewed by "Krakkos". I'll revert the edit to the page I'd created for the reasons given above.

You included absolutely no independent sources discussing "945 day", just P45. Praxidicae (talk) 15:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

P45 Day

It's not "945 day", it's "P45 Day", a United Kingdom euphenism. As regards evidence, give me a chance!!!

I meant p45 day. You provided 0 sources and I can find none that are reliable. Wikipedia isn't urban dictionary. Praxidicae (talk) 15:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello!

Hi Praxidicae. I kindly ask you to check the article on the Italian painter Pino Concialdi. I personally think that the encyclopedic relevance is missing. The article contains exclusively local sources linked exclusively to the places where this artist worked, that is in Sicily, region of Italy. --5.171.234.98 (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Nino Aquila is notable?

Hi Praxidicae. I kindly ask you to check the article Nino Aquila. I personally think that the encyclopedic relevance is missing.--5.171.234.98 (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Sandro Bracchitta

Hi Praxidicae, could you check the article on Sandro Bracchitta? There seem to be doubts about its relevance. In my opinion it should be checked properly. --5.171.234.98 (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome to check them yourself, as I don't generally take edit requests. If you find they do not meet inclusion criteria please see WP:AFDHOWTO. Praxidicae (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Mattijis Otterloo

Can we either tell the full story about the lad (meaning don’t rever my edits) or would you otherwise agree on a speedy deletion, since the lad is not really notice? His entire wiki page is promotional nonsense. MelloNFortnite (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't know what you're on about but the deletion request has twice been declined. Do not re-add. If you feel it should still be deleted, take it to afd. See WP:AFDHOWTO. Praxidicae (talk) 18:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I have nominated the article for deletion using the steps you linked to in WP:AFDHOWTO. I hope I did this correctly. Thank you. 19:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Cheers

Merry Christmas, Praxidicae! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't have any conflict of interest

I don't have any undisclose financial stake in promoting any topic or conflict of interest. I just want to contribute positively to Wikipedia and make it more better platform. @Praxidicae:. I wanted to reply you on my talk page but because of some technical issue I was not able reply there so I reply you on here

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays! May your winter holidays be filled with joy, laughter and good health. Wishing you all the best in 2020 and beyond.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 21:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

The Washington Free Beacon

You need to explain your tag on the talk page with specifics. Doug Weller talk 21:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

I think it's fairly obvious why I tagged considering it has a 48 rating from WFP and it publishes absolute trash like this but is inexplicably and overwhelmingly only giving positive reviews on WP despite several actual RS reporting the opposite. Praxidicae (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't disagree, but you still need to say that on the talk page to help editors who have it on their watchlist.Hell I might even work on it. Doug Weller talk 21:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはPraxidicaeたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ghanada

@Praxidicae: Hey, i think there are a lot of sources. Can you please guide me. Thanks. AnuYog