Jump to content

Neo-Nazism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Royalguard11 (talk | contribs)
m Unprotected Neo-Nazism: Page protected for a while; hopefully protection is no longer necessary.
NovaNova (talk | contribs)
→‎Croatia: Restored section
Line 1: Line 1:

'''Neo-Nazism''' is the ideology of post-[[World War II]] political movements seeking to revive [[Nazism]].
'''Neo-Nazism''' is the ideology of post-[[World War II]] political movements seeking to revive [[Nazism]].


Line 52: Line 51:
==Croatia==
==Croatia==
{{seealso|Neo-Nazism in Croatia}}
{{seealso|Neo-Nazism in Croatia}}

Neo-Nazism in [[Croatia]] is usually rooted in support for the
[[Ustasha]], an organization that worked with the German Nazis during World War II. Support for this movement has been tied to residual hatred from the Yugoslav wars, and to Croatian [[nationalism]]. The resurgence of the Ustasha movement in post-war Croatia is partly due to the financial support of Ustasha members who emigrated to the [[Croatian Democratic Union]] during the 1990s. Ustashe still has a party headquarters in Zagreb. [http://www.christusrex.org/www1/news/haaretz-1-15-06a.html]

To many of their modern supporters, the Ustasha are considered merely victims of the [[Bleiburg massacre]], and late President [[Franjo Tuđman]] even proposed to rebury them together with victims of the [[Jasenovac concentration camp]], as a sign of national reconciliation.{{fact}} Croatian Serbs felt insulted by that proposal. In 1999, [[Zagreb]]'s ''Square of the Victims of Fascism'' was renamed ''The Square of The Great Men of Croatia'', provoking widespread criticism of Croatia's attitude toward the [[Holocaust]].[http://www.iwpr.net/?p=bcr&s=f&o=246286&apc_state=henibcr1999]

Many streets in Croatia were renamed after the prominent Ustasha figure [[Mile Budak]], which provoked outrage in the Serbian minority. Since 2002, there has been a reversal of this development, and streets with the name of Mile Budak or other persons connected with the Ustasha movement are few or non-existent. A plaque in [[Slunj]] with the inscription "Croatian Knight Jure Francetić" was erected to commemorate [[Jure Francetic]], the notorious Ustasha leader of the Black Legion. The plaque remained there for four years, until it was removed by the authorities. [http://www.ex-yupress.com/nacional/nacional7.html], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3605236.stm], [http://see.oneworld.net/article/view/92811/1/]

Post-war support for Ustasha is perhaps most visible in the form of [[graffiti]]. The serif letter U (sometimes embellished with a cross, and/or the letters NDH), representing Ustasha, is the most common, and there have been instances of more explicit hate speech. The phrase [[Srbe na vrbe!]] (meaning "hang Serbs on the willow trees!") has also appeared in graffiti. An Orthodox church was sprayed with pro-Ustasha graffiti in 2004. [http://www.index.hr/clanak.aspx?id=279919][http://www.spc.org.yu/Vesti-2004/04/28-4-04-e01.html#usta] Police have sped up responses to the appearance of extreme right wing graffiti and other hate vandalism. [http://www.index.hr/clanak.aspx?id=253042]

During some protests in Croatia, supporters of [[Ante Gotovina]] and other suspected war criminals have carried nationalist symbols and pictures of [[Ante Pavelic]][http://www.novilist.hr/default.asp?WCI=Pretrazivac&WCU=285A285B2863285D2863285A28582858285E2863286328632859285F2859285F2861285828632863286328592863M] A popular Croatian singer [[Thompson (band)|Thompson]] has been singing the ''[[Jasenovac i Gradiska Stara]]'' in his concerts; a song which glorifies the Ustasha and their genocide of Serbs, Jews and Gypsies. [http://www.pavelicpapers.com/archive/0101/5.html].

In the year of 2003 there was made an attempt to amend the Croatian Penal Code by adding the articles incriminating any public display of Nazi symbols, propagating Nazi ideology, historical revisionism, and holocaust denial. This attempt was prevented by the Croatian Constitutional Court - on November 27 of the same year. [http://www.novilist.hr/default.asp?WCI=Pretrazivac&WCU=285A285F2863285E2863285A28582858285E286328632863286028582860285D285C28632863286328592863F]

Another move of the Croatian state toward the Nazi era law interpretetion and practice - was made in the year of 2005 - by granting exclusive rights to the Croatian Parliament (Sabor) - to 'the law authenticity interpretation' (in Croatian - pravo vjerodostojnog tumacenja zakona) [http://www.novilist.hr/default.asp?WCI=Pretrazivac&WCU=285B28582863285928592863285A28582858285E2863286328632859285E2861285E285A285C28632863286328592863I].

==Germany==
==Germany==
[[Image:Neo-nazi.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A militant Neo-Nazi in Germany.]]
[[Image:Neo-nazi.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A militant Neo-Nazi in Germany.]]

Revision as of 02:50, 3 January 2007

Neo-Nazism is the ideology of post-World War II political movements seeking to revive Nazism.

The exact ideals adopted by a neo-Nazi movement can vary, but it often includes an allegiance to Adolf Hitler and the use of insignia of Nazi Germany (e.g. the swastika, Sig Runes, and the red-white-black color scheme). Their ideology usually includes anti-Semitism, racism, xenophobia, nationalism, militarism, and homophobia.

Some groups and individuals who support that ideology openly declare themselves as Nazis or neo-Nazis, but others eschew those terms to avoid social stigma or legal consequences. Some European countries have laws prohibiting the expression of pro-Nazi, racist or anti-semitic views, thus no significant political party would describe itself as neo-Nazi in those countries.

Current knowledge of neo-Nazi activity indicates that it is a global phenomenon, with organized representation in almost every Western country, as well as international networks. Despite this, modern Nazi groups are extremely marginalized by the stigma inherent in their politics.

Individuals who have attempted to revive Nazism include Colin Jordan, George Lincoln Rockwell, Savitri Devi, Francis Parker Yockey, William Pierce, Eddy Morrison, David Myatt

Holocaust denial and minimization

File:Mass Grave Bergen Belsen May 1945.jpg
Mass graves at Bergen-Belsen in 1945; neo-Nazis claim such evidence is either counterfeit or misrepresented.

Many neo-Nazis promote Holocaust denial. They claim that the intentional mass murder — often in gas chambers — of about 6,000,000 Jews (and millions of others, including Serbs, Poles, Roma, Sinti, the disabled, Freemasons, communists, anarchists, homosexuals and Jehovah's Witnesses) is a lie or grossly exaggerated. These claims are unsupported by reputable historians.

Some accuse them of using Holocaust denial to make Nazism more palatable by removing its association with genocide. Some Holocaust deniers don't identify as neo-Nazis, although many of their works are quoted and distributed by neo-Nazis.

Some neo-Nazis who don't deny the Holocaust have pointed out alleged immoral equivalencies (e.g. the bombing of Dresden and the Expulsion of Germans after World War II), or have justified executions by the Nazis as retaliations for sabotage, terrorism and subversion.

Austria

Immediately after the Allies liberated Austria in 1945, the anti-Nazi parties - Socialists (SPÖ), Conservatives (ÖVP) and Communists (KPÖ) - passed legislation to overcome the effects of Nazi rule. A law passed on May 8, 1945, banned the NSDAP and Nazi activities.

The denazification program designed to purge the state apparatus and society of Nazi followers was not successful, mainly because of the size of the problem and the bureaucratic shortcomings of the program. This failure was reflected primarily in the fact that ex-members and sympathizers of the NSDAP did not change their beliefs.

Over 500,000 registered Nazis were allowed to vote in the 1949 general election.[citation needed] A considerable number of ex-Nazis were integrated into the SPÖ and the ÖVP, and several concessions were made to appease them, such as suppression of the history of the Nazizeit (literally 'Nazi Time'); a fall-off in the prosecutions of Nazi war criminals; and the reinstatement of Nazi civil servants, teachers, professors, lawyers and police officers.

In the 1949 Austrian elections, ex-Nazis in the Verband der Unabhängigen (VdU) put up candidates and won seats, and the Austrian right wing went through a process of growth. The withdrawal of Allied troops from Austria in 1955 encouraged the consolidation of right-wing groups, ranging from neo-Nazis to moderate Pan-Germans.

The VdU split in 1955, but re-formed itself one year later as the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). The first leaders of the FPÖ were former Nazis, such as Anton Reinthaller, who had been a government minister in the Nazi era, and Friedrich Peter, who had been a Schutzstaffel (SS) officer.

The Austrian public saw itself confronted with the organized right for the first time in 1959, during the Schiller Celebrations, when Pan-German youth, sport and cultural organizations took to the streets. The Burschenschaften and schlagende Verbindungen (fraternities of male uniformed students), the FPÖ's students' organization RFS and its graduate equivalent Freiheitliche Akademikerverbände (FAV) attained considerable influence within student and university bodies.[citation needed]

1960s and later

In 1960, during the South Tyrol Crisis, right-wing extremists, along with German Kameraden, gained notoriety by involvement in terrorist acts in South Tyrol, Italy.[citation needed] Prominent among these was Norbert Burger, the ex-RFS leader and subsequent chairman of the neo-Nazi Nationaldemokratische Partei (NDP). The influence that the extreme right had gained in the universities became dramatically apparent five years later, during the Borodajkewycz Affair. Hundreds of students demonstrated in favor of the anti-semitic university professor Borodajkewycz, and were involved in street battles — in the course of which Ernst Kirchweger, a former concentration camp inmate, was beaten to death.[citation needed]

During the 1960s and 1970s, Friedrich Peter, Chairman of the FPÖ, started establishing his party within the democratic party system — leading up to the entry of the FPÖ into a coalition government with the Socialists in 1983. This development led to the formation of a group around Norbert Burger (condemned in absentia by an Italian court for terrorist offenses in South Tyrol), which split from the FPÖ in 1966 and set up the NDP. In contrast to its German counterpart of the same name, the Austrian NDP found little resonance in an electorate moving to the left in the late 1960s.

The volume "Rechtsextremismus in Österreich seit 1945", issued by DÖW in 1979, listed nearly 50 active extreme right-wing organizations in Austria. Their influence waned gradually, partly due to liberalization programs in secondary schools and universities that emphasized Austrian identity and democratic traditions. Votes for the RFS in student elections fell from 30% in the 1960s to 2% in 1987.[citation needed] In the 1995 elections for the student representative body Österreichische Hochschülerschaft, the RFS got 4% of the vote. The FPÖ won 22% of the votes at the General Election in the same year.[citation needed]

In the 1980s, in the province of Carinthia, border issues with Slovenia — and disagreements over the rights of Carinthia's Slovenian minority — were used to orchestrate support for the far right organization Kärntner Heimatdienst.

Belgium

A Belgian neo-Nazi organization, Bloed-Bodem-Eer-Trouw (Blood, Land, Honour and Faithfulness), was created in 2004 after splitting from the international network Blood and Honour). The group rose to public prominence in September 2006, after 17 members (including 11 soldiers) were arrested under the December 2003 anti-terrorist laws and laws against racism, anti-semitism and negationism. According to Justice Minister Laurette Onkelinx and Interior Minister Patrick Dewael, the suspects (11 of whom were members of the military) were preparing terrorist attacks in order to "destabilize" Belgium.[1][2]

According to journalist Manuel Abramowicz, of the Resistances network, the ultras of the radical right have always had as aim to "infiltrate the state mechanisms," including the army in the 1970s and the 1980s, through Westland New Post and the Front de la Jeunesse.[3]

A police operation, which mobilized 150 agents, searched five military barracks (in Leopoldsburg near the Dutch border: Kleine-Brogel, Peer, Brussels (Royal military school) and Zedelgem — as well as 18 private addresses in Flanders. They found weapons, munitions, explosives, and a homemade bomb large enough to make "a car explode." The leading suspect, B.T., was organizing the trafficing of weapons, and was developing international links, in particular with the Dutch far right movement De Nationale Alliantie[4][5][6][7][8][9]

Croatia

Neo-Nazism in Croatia is usually rooted in support for the Ustasha, an organization that worked with the German Nazis during World War II. Support for this movement has been tied to residual hatred from the Yugoslav wars, and to Croatian nationalism. The resurgence of the Ustasha movement in post-war Croatia is partly due to the financial support of Ustasha members who emigrated to the Croatian Democratic Union during the 1990s. Ustashe still has a party headquarters in Zagreb. [1]

To many of their modern supporters, the Ustasha are considered merely victims of the Bleiburg massacre, and late President Franjo Tuđman even proposed to rebury them together with victims of the Jasenovac concentration camp, as a sign of national reconciliation.[citation needed] Croatian Serbs felt insulted by that proposal. In 1999, Zagreb's Square of the Victims of Fascism was renamed The Square of The Great Men of Croatia, provoking widespread criticism of Croatia's attitude toward the Holocaust.[2]

Many streets in Croatia were renamed after the prominent Ustasha figure Mile Budak, which provoked outrage in the Serbian minority. Since 2002, there has been a reversal of this development, and streets with the name of Mile Budak or other persons connected with the Ustasha movement are few or non-existent. A plaque in Slunj with the inscription "Croatian Knight Jure Francetić" was erected to commemorate Jure Francetic, the notorious Ustasha leader of the Black Legion. The plaque remained there for four years, until it was removed by the authorities. [3], [4], [5]

Post-war support for Ustasha is perhaps most visible in the form of graffiti. The serif letter U (sometimes embellished with a cross, and/or the letters NDH), representing Ustasha, is the most common, and there have been instances of more explicit hate speech. The phrase Srbe na vrbe! (meaning "hang Serbs on the willow trees!") has also appeared in graffiti. An Orthodox church was sprayed with pro-Ustasha graffiti in 2004. [6][7] Police have sped up responses to the appearance of extreme right wing graffiti and other hate vandalism. [8]

During some protests in Croatia, supporters of Ante Gotovina and other suspected war criminals have carried nationalist symbols and pictures of Ante Pavelic[9] A popular Croatian singer Thompson has been singing the Jasenovac i Gradiska Stara in his concerts; a song which glorifies the Ustasha and their genocide of Serbs, Jews and Gypsies. [10].

In the year of 2003 there was made an attempt to amend the Croatian Penal Code by adding the articles incriminating any public display of Nazi symbols, propagating Nazi ideology, historical revisionism, and holocaust denial. This attempt was prevented by the Croatian Constitutional Court - on November 27 of the same year. [11]

Another move of the Croatian state toward the Nazi era law interpretetion and practice - was made in the year of 2005 - by granting exclusive rights to the Croatian Parliament (Sabor) - to 'the law authenticity interpretation' (in Croatian - pravo vjerodostojnog tumacenja zakona) [12].

Germany

A militant Neo-Nazi in Germany.

In Germany immediately after World War II, Allied forces and the new German government attempted to prevent the creation of new Nazi movements through a process known as denazification. There was little overt neo-Nazi activity in Europe until the 1960s. However, some former Nazis retained their political beliefs, and passed them down to new generations.

After German reunification in the 1990s, neo-Nazi groups gained more followers, mostly among disaffected teenagers in the former East Germany. Many were new groups that arose amidst the economic collapse and high unemployment in the former East Germany. Many neo-Nazis from the east disliked communism, but many of them have held socialist economic views.[citation needed] They have also had an aversion to people from Slavic countries (especially Poland) and people of other national backgrounds who moved from the former West Germany into the former German Democratic Republic after Germany was reunited. Their ideology was similar to that of Otto Strasser.

Neo-Nazi activities

German neo-Nazis have engaged in several violent attacks on immigrants and ethnic minorities. These actions have included attacks on accommodations for refugees in Hoyerswerda (September 17-September 22, 1991); Rostock-Lichtenhagen (August 23-August 27, 1992); and Schwedt, Eberswalde, Eisenhüttenstadt, Elsterwerda (October 1991). A neo-Nazi arson attack on the house of a Turkish family in Solingen (May 29, 1993), resulted in the deaths of two women and three girls, and in severe injuries for seven other people. Neo-Nazis were involved in the murders of three Turkish girls in an arson attack in Mölln (November 23, 1992), in which nine other people were injured.[citation needed] These events preceded demonstrations with hundreds of thousands of participants protesting against extreme right violence in many German cities.[citation needed] These protests precipitated massive neo-Nazi counter-demonstrations. The demonstrations have often erupted in violent clashes between neo-Nazis and anti-fascists.

Official German statistics record 178 violent crimes motivated by right-wing extremism in 1990.[citation needed] Statistics show that in 1991, there were 849 crimes, and in 1992 there were 1,485 (with a significant concentration in the eastern Bundesländer). After 1992, the numbers went down, although they have risen sharply in subsequent years. In the former East Germany, an average of 17 people have been murdered every year by far right groups. [13]

Anti-Nazi legislation

German law forbids the production of pro-Nazi materials, so such items are smuggled into the country mostly from the United States, Scandinavia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Italy.[citation needed] Neo-Nazi rock bands such as Landser have been outlawed in Germany, yet bootleg copies of their albums printed in the US and other countries are still sold in the country.

After the swastika became banned in Germany, some neo-Nazis began to display the older German Empire flag.

An American neo-Nazi group called NSDAP/AO runs an illegal smuggling ring, for supplying pro-Nazi materials to neo-Nazis in Europe and other locations where such materials are banned by law. NSDAP/AO supplies items such as magazines, CDs, posters, portraits, clothing, patches, stickers, pamphlets. [citation needed]

German neo-Nazi websites mostly depend on Internet servers in the US and Canada, and use other terms for Nazi ideas and symbols. They also invent new symbols reminiscent of the swastika and adopt other symbols used by the Nazis, such as the sun disc, sun wheel, hooked cross, wolf's cross, wolf's hook, black sun, and dark star.

A trial was held before the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany over the prohibition of the National Democratic Party (NPD), considered (though not proven to be) a neo-Nazi party.[citation needed] In the course of the trial, it was discovered that some high-ranking party members worked as informants for the domestic intelligence service, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz. The trial was temporarily suspended, and then rejected by the court because of the unclear influence of informants within the NPD.

In 2004, NPD received 9.1% of the vote in the parliamentary elections for Saxony, thus earning the right to seat local parliament members.[citation needed] The other parties refused to enter discussions with the NPD. In the 2006 parliamentary elections for Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, the NPD received 7.3% of the vote and six seats in the local parliament.

Greece

File:Imia06 2.jpg
Neo-Nazi march in Athens, 2006

Despite its minor electoral importance, and the fact that many Greeks are not considered `white' by neo-Nazis who adhere to the Nordic theory, neo-Nazism in Greece is visible through swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans in graffiti all over the country (especially in Peloponnese).[citation needed]

The most notable Greek neo-Nazi political organization was Hrisi Avgi, which stopped its activities in late 2005. Hrisi Avgi held 10 offices across Greece, and published a monthly youth magazine.[citation needed] Members of Hrisi Avgi have continued their activities through the Patriotic Alliance, a nationalist party formed two months before the 2004 European Parliament elections (in which it gathered 10,000 votes, corresponding to 0,17% of the general vote).[citation needed]

Neo-Nazis in Greece are influenced by the Metaxas quasi-fascist dictatorship, the Security Battalions during the Second World War, and the collaborationist regimes which were placed in power by the Nazis during the German occupation of Greece (1940-1944) — such as those of Tsolakoglou, Ioannis Rallis and Logothetopoulos.

Neo-nazis in Greece have been tied to hate-driven attacks on immigrants, homosexuals and leftists. One of the most deadly attacks was the murder of three immigrants in central Athens by racist Pandelis Kazakos.[citation needed] Twelve Greek neo-Nazis participated as volunteers in the Yugoslav wars in Bosnia, aiding the Serbian Army in capturing the town of Srebrenica.[citation needed]

Greek neo-Nazis have been active in football hooliganism. In September 2004, during a football match between Albania and Greece, Albanian hooligans set the Greek flag on fire, so members of Hrisi Avgi and The Blue Army (a nationalist group of football fans) launched a series of riots. They targeted Albanian immigrants in Greece, killing one and wounding seven.

Russia

File:Bookcover The ABC of a Russian Nationalist.jpg
Bookcover of The ABC of a Russian Nationalist by A.P. Barkashov
File:Ff164.jpg
Members of the Russian National Unity give a Nazi salute

The post-Soviet era has seen the rise of a variety of extreme nationalist movements in Russia, some of which are openly neo-fascist or neo-Nazi. These organizations are characterized by extreme xenophobia and anti-Semitism. A few of these groups support overthrowing the government and taking power by force.

Social roots

The collapse of the Soviet economic system in the early 1990s caused great economic and social problems,including widespread unemployment and poverty.

This discontent found its main outlet in the major political parties that opposed the Boris Yeltsin government, especially the Communist Party of the Russian Federation — which supported a return to some of the Soviet-era economic policies — and the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia — a xenophobic and chauvinist party without a clear agenda beyond the opposition to the ruling political factions allied to Yeltsin. It became clear that neither of these two parties was capable of accomplishing any serious changes in national policies, and they came to be widely seen as selling out to the anti-people regime (a label widely used by the Communists to refer to Yeltsin's government).

Several far right paramilitary organizations were able to tap into popular discontent, particularly among the marginalized, lesser educated, and habitually unemployed youth. Of the three major age groups — youths, adults, and the elderly — youths may have been hit the hardest. The elderly suffered due to inadequate (or unpaid) pensions, but they found effective political representation in the Communists, and generally had their concerns addressed through better budget allocations.

Adults, although often suffering financially and psychologically due to job losses, were generally able to find new sources of income. Moreover, Soviet-era indoctrination into the ideals of egalitarianism predisposed most against the message of right-wing extremists. The youths generally had no such prior inclinations, and had only experienced the final days of the Communist regime, largely consisting of brutal crackdowns without the presence of communist ideals.

Ideology

Russian neo-Nazi organizations have generally defined themselves as standing outside of the political process, disdaining the electoral system and advocating the overthrow of the government by force. Their ideology has centered on defending Russian national identity against what they perceive as a takeover ethnic minority groups, notably Jews and Caucasian immigrants. Cleansing the nation by killing or expelling the non-Russians has been a generally accepted goal. Their ideology became epitomized in the slogan "Russia for the Russians", a catchphrase also adopted by less extreme factions. Russian neo-Nazis have generally not outlined discernible economic programs.

Russian neo-Nazis have openly admired and imitated the German Nazis and Adolf Hitler, and the book Mein Kampf stood high on their reading list. The most prominent organization, Russian National Union, led by Aleksandr Barkashov, adopted a three-ray swastika as its emblem (the Nazi swastika can be thought of consisting of two rays; the Z shaped segments). In order to harmonize Hitler's notion of the Germanic master race with the Russian national feeling, the doctrine was updated to include all Aryans or Indo-Europeans, both Germanic and Slavic. This definition explicitly excluded Jews and the people from the Caucasus, who are widely seen as alien and black because of a slightly darker skin tone. Russian neo-Nazis have considered the Russians to be a special and chosen nation, while looking down on others, including the non-Russian Slavic peoples.

Activities

Russian neo-Nazis have made it an explicit goal to take over the country by force, and they did put serious effort into preparing for this.[citation needed] Paramilitary organizations operating under the guise of sports clubs have trained their members in squad tactics and weapons handling. They have stockpiled weapons, often illegally. Reputedly, many were interested in martial arts and unarmed combat, and have organized realistic hand-to-hand combat classes. Neo-Nazis in Russia have also used legallly-obtained weapons when confronting opponents. For example, Russian neo-Nazis once used bats to beat two lightly-armed African American US Marines guarding the wife of a congressman.[citation needed]

Russian neo-Nazis' most notable action so far was the participation in the armed defense of the Supreme Soviet building against government forces during the standoff between Yeltsin and the Communist-dominated parliament in 1993.[citation needed]

United States

In the United States, neo-Nazi groups are a sub-type of a wider array of anti-semitic and white supremacist groups. American neo-Nazi groups tend to pay homage to — but are often less focused on — the specific tenets of the NSDAP than some neo-Nazi groups in other countries.

Neo-Nazi groups in the United States can be traced back to the 1920s, with the US branch of the National Socialist German Workers Party. This organization merged with Free Society of Teutonia to form the German-American Bund. The Bund and other groups achieved a limited popularity in the 1930s (at one point staging a rally with over 20,000 people), but rapidly faded with the onset of World War Two. The groups either disbanded or were dismantled by force during the war period.

After the war, new organizations formed, with varying degrees of support for Nazi principles. It is difficult to determine the extent of neo-Nazi organizations in the United States, because these groups are aware that public opinion concerning them is negative, and there are organizations dedicated to monitoring their activities (such as the Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center). While a small minority of neo-Nazis draw public attention, most operate underground, so they may recruit, organize and raise funds without interference or harassment.

The United States Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, which allows political organizations great latitude in expressing Nazi, racist and anti-semitic views. American neo-Nazi groups often operate websites, occasionally stage public demonstrations, and maintain ties to groups in Europe and elsewhere. However, neo-Nazis are a tiny percentage of the national population. More often than not, neo-Nazis are outnumbered by counter-protesters at public demonstrations, and are quickly prosecuted for any crimes, such as hate crimes. In addition to targeting Jews and African Americans, neo-Nazi groups are known to harass and attack Asian Americans, Catholics, Latinos, Italian Americans, Arab Americans, homosexuals and people with different political or religious opinions.

Neo-Nazism and the law

Some American neo-Nazi groups espouse violence, however it is sometimes difficult for authorities to implicate them in violence or illegality in any meaningful way. In many cases, the organizations that neo-Nazis intend to be financially, politically and socially successful are made out to be professional and respectable, whereas other, less important groups and individuals are almost always the ones responsible for criminal acts. In this way, prominent neo-Nazis may inspire, incite or even order violent crimes without much fear that their involvement will be traced back to an official organization.

One notable North American exceptions to this fact are The Order, which had members convicted of crimes such as racketeering, conspiracy, violating civil rights and sedition. Other exceptions are Matthew F. Hale of the World Church of the Creator, who was imprisoned for soliciting the murder of a federal judge; and Richard Butler of Aryan Nations, which lost a $6.2 million dollar lawsuit after Aryan Nations members opened fire on a passing vehicle. Aryan Nations has since lost its headquarters and paramilitary training grounds, and has split into three separate organizations.

Neo-Nazi organizations

The Americas


File:Hailhitler.jpg
A Finnish neo-Nazi

Scandinavia

UK

Italy

Other European Countries

Other

Neo-Nazi bands

See also

References

Primary sources

Academic surveys

  • The Beast Reawakens by Martin A. Lee, (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1997, ISBN 0-316-51959-6)
  • Fascism (Oxford Readers) by Roger Griffin (1995, ISBN 0-19-289249-5)
  • Beyond Eagle and Swastika: German nationalism since 1945 by Kurt P. Tauber (Wesleyan University Press; [1st ed.] edition, 1967)
  • Biographical Dictionary of the Extreme Right Since 1890 edited by Philip Rees, (1991, ISBN 0-13-089301-3)
  • Hitler's Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth, and Neo-Nazism by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke (1998, ISBN 0-8147-3111-2 and ISBN 0-8147-3110-4)
  • Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International by Kevin Coogan, (Autonomedia, Brooklyn, NY 1998, ISBN 1-57027-039-2)
  • Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party by William H. Schmaltz (Potomac Books, 2000, ISBN 1-57488-262-7)
  • American Fuehrer: George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party by Frederick J. Simonelli (University of Illinois Press, 1999, ISBN 0-252-02285-8)
  • Fascism in Britain: A History, 1918-1985 by Richard C. Thurlow (Olympic Marketing Corp, 1987, ISBN 0-631-13618-5)
  • Fascism Today: A World Survey by Angelo Del Boca and Mario Giovana (Pantheon Books, 1st American edition, 1969)
  • Swastika and the Eagle: Neo-Naziism in America Today by Clifford L Linedecker (A & W Pub, 1982, ISBN 0-89479-100-1)
  • The Silent Brotherhood: Inside America's Racist Underground by Kevin Flynn and Gary Gerhardt (Signet Book; Reprint edition, 1995, ISBN 0-451-16786-4)
  • "White Power, White Pride!": The White Separatist Movement in the United States by Betty A. Dobratz with Stephanie L. Shanks-Meile (hardcover, Twayne Publishers, 1997, ISBN 0-8057-3865-7); a.k.a. The White Separatist Movement in the United States: White Power White Pride (paperback, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2000, ISBN 0-8018-6537-9)
  • Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right by Jeffrey Kaplan (Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc, 2000, ISBN 0-7425-0340-2)
  • Blood in the Face: The Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, Nazi Skinheads, and the Rise of a New White Culture by James Ridgeway (Thunder's Mouth Press; 2nd edition, 1995, ISBN 1-56025-100-X)
  • A Hundred Little Hitlers: The Death of a Black Man, the Trial of a White Racist, and the Rise of the Neo-Nazi Movement in America by Elinor Langer (Metropolitan Books, 2003, ISBN 0-8050-5098-1)
  • The Racist Mind: Portraits of American Neo-Nazis and Klansmen by Raphael S. Ezekiel (Penguin (Non-Classics); Reprint edition, 1996, ISBN 0-14-023449-7)
  • Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism and the Politics of Identity by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke (2001, ISBN 0-8147-3155-4)
  • Free to Hate: The Rise of the Right in Post-Communist Eastern Europe by Paul Hockenos (Routledge; Reprint edition, 1994, ISBN 0-415-91058-7)
  • The Dark Side of Europe: The Extreme Right Today by Geoff Harris, (Edinburgh University Press; New edition, 1994, ISBN 0-7486-0466-9)
  • The Far Right in Western and Eastern Europe by Luciano Cheles, Ronnie Ferguson, and Michalina Vaughan (Longman Publishing Group; 2nd edition, 1995, ISBN 0-582-23881-1)
  • The Radical Right in Western Europe : A Comparative Analysis by Herbert Kitschelt (University of Michigan Press; Reprint edition, 1997, ISBN 0-472-08441-0)
  • Shadows Over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe edited by Martin Schain, Aristide Zolberg, and Patrick Hossay (Palgrave Macmillan; 1st edition, 2002, ISBN 0-312-29593-6)
  • The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds: An Up-Close Portrait of White Nationalist William Pierce by Robert S. Griffin (Authorhouse, 2001, ISBN 0-7596-0933-0)
  • Nation and Race: The Developing Euro-American Racist Subculture by Jeffrey Kaplan, Tore Bjorgo (Northeastern University Press, 1998, ISBN 1-55553-331-0)
  • Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism by Mattias Gardell (Duke University Press, 2003, ISBN 0-8223-3071-7)
  • The Nazi conception of law (Oxford pamphlets on world affairs) by J. Walter Jones, Clarendon (1939)

News reports and criticism

Supporters