User talk:Junior5a

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

PLEASE MAKE A NEW SECTION WHEN WRITING SOMETHING NEW, OR REPLY UNDERNEATH THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE THANKS!!!

Thanks, I had the wrong title for that page and was not sure how to delete. Created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kline-Miller_Multiemployer_Pension_Reform_Act_of_2014 instead. Not sure how to title footnotes at the moment. I'm assuming you like this section so any help would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gm2587 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, Junior5a. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 05:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sending me :) --Junior5a (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would Billy Corgan be upset of he saw that I "vandalized" his wiki page? Would you say that he would be in a...rage...?

Ash108738 (talk) 18:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mushkil Samme Mein

It's not a Wikipedia article, pleaase correct.Xx236 (talk) 11:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Junior5a (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

I noticed you're patrolling, however, I wonder if you may actually be too unfamiliar with patrolling new articles exactly yet; for example, Skazz was entirely WP:A7 material and should have been tagged as such, I have now tagged it. Please ask me if you need help with any of this. SwisterTwister talk 22:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have few checking source some few errors. Junior5a (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

when will classic hits t.o be deleted

hi Junior5a when will classic hits t.o be deleted i just want to know — Preceding unsigned comment added by KQVN1620AM (talk • contribs) 00:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You would move your sandbox due to test page. Junior5a (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

how do i do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by KQVN1620AM (talk • contribs) 00:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M with hook

You removed my {{db-move}} from Ɱ with the rationale Keyboard special characters would be used.. Could you please clarify your reasoning? Pppery (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's looks like lowercase and uppercase would be both that with symbols. Junior5a (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand what you mean. Why does how one types characters on a keyboard argue against moving M with hook to Ɱ. Pppery (talk) 02:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery and Junior5a: Wikipedia:Article titles#Special characters says "Sometimes the most appropriate title contains ... characters not found on most English-language keyboards... In such cases, provide redirects from versions of the title that use only standard keyboard characters." Since Wikipedia policy says we should do it that way, not the other way around, I shall make the move. It won't make it any harder for anyone to find the page, because typing in "M with hook" will still take them to the page via a redirect. (Incidentally, I have no idea why "It's looks like lowercase and uppercase would be both that with symbols" is a reason for not making the move.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Linguist111. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Oshwah. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Linguist 111 Please reply on the current talk page and ping me by typing {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message as a courtesy 17:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

My mistake i think it is against wikipedia rules. Junior5a (talk) 17:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually see anything wrong with the edit. To me, it just looked like a harmless and rather jokey comment. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more thorough patrolling

Hi, and thanks for doing New Page patrol. One comment, when patrolling sometimes articles have fairly obvious clues that they are copied from somewhere. I'm referring to Flame botnet which you patrolled. That article, it turns out, was copied wholesale from Koobface. The giveaway clue that something was off would be the inline references copied from the source, such as Flame Botnet is a network worm that attacks Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux platforms.[1][2][3]. While patrolling is a desperately needed task, being thorough with checking for copies is also extremely important to avoid copyright infringements. Thanks! Crow^Caw 22:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Junior5a (talk) 02:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for taking the time to do what I'm too lazy to do :) TJH2018 talk 02:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! \(◣_◢)/ ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 02:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my edit

My edit on Bilal saeed page was correct I added his upcoming single song in list but you have deleted Why Please reply Saad Saad636363 (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per A1 You are doing all the goods, if you want to edit or new page, the best way to choose to make a new sandbox or draft. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My edit on Pimpaka Towira page was correct and updated Why did you delete my updated information? Please reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotkamon (talk • contribs) 08:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attack Page Directed at You

User:Whoknowswhoknowsim/sandbox/Junior5a was created by an editor (Whoknowswhoknowsim (talk · contribs)) (and an IP with the edit to that page as its sole contribution) with nothing but a series of insults directed at you. I have put nominated it for speedy deletion as an attack page and warned the creator, but I thought you might have wanted to know. Three07457 (talk) 23:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you send for helping, However I have seen report to ARV. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 23:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith

Hi Junior5a, thanks for informing Kruti Brahmbhatt that their edit to Pav bhaji was reverted. Please consider a gentler tone for newly registered users making their first edits - we don't want to scare new contributors away before they have got to grips with WP policy. Best wishes Guffydrawers (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that about i don't want bite new contributors, I'll next time check this if it is good faith edits ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 19:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it was a harmless edit

i was only mentioning the murder of The Lord Harambe --TheEmeraldMiner (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Leon the Commie[reply]

No, What a silly just follow all the rules. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 21:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make useful contributions, but one of your contributions you made to Honolulu Rail Transit appeared to be unconstructive and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. 72.234.202.146 (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rhino (wrestler), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-)

Hi Junior5a! I just wanted to leave you a message and personally welcome you to Wikipedia. I've seen your contributions so far, and I want to thank you so much for your time and your effort volunteering to the project. It means a lot to us :-). If you have any questions, or if you need help with anything, my talk page is always open to you. Please do not hesitate to message me at any time. I'll be happy to assist you with anything that you need. I hope you have a great rest of your day, and I wish you happy editing :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sending for me, however sometimes busy but i'm planning for sandbox for something :) ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 06:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello Junior5a. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149 KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 20:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that.~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings from user pages

Hi Junior5a. I saw this edit you made at User talk:Kamalikachanda and while I uderstand the reasons why you re-added the warnings, a user may remove certain warnings and comments from the user talk pages if they wish to do so as explained in WP:UP#CMT. There are certain earnings, etc. that a user may not remove from their talk pages, but for the most part removing something is considered to be affirmation that they have read the warning and understand what it means. I won't revert your edit, but it would probably be a good idea for you to go back and self-revert in this particular case. --- Marchjuly (talk) 09:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

game grumps and vodka

yeah sorry i was just being silly, i wont do it again its cool — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.138.140.92 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I changed

Your CSD from G1 to A7 because it's a person. Most of the admins don't care if you slip with the wrong tag but a couple will get on your case.--Savonneux (talk) 08:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah,i just misclicked to G1 sorry that about ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 08:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		Varun's Guestbook Barnstar
		Sign my guestbook and win this Barnstar. Simple! Varun FEB2003

Ah, thank you :D ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 12:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Peacemaker67. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kolach have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please check what you are reverting to when reverting. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's wasn't clearly build here. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slough

Hi

I am trying to make the article more inline with Wikipedia guidlines. Can you advise what I am doing wrong please? Many thanks, FN --FN777 (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will try to use your advise. Apologies for making it look like I was vandalising the article.--FN777 (talk) 13:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. "Show preview" would be good idea. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 13:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am now taking it step by step to show all my changes. Thank you for your help. --FN777 (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitnation

Hello,

I saw you placed the copyright tag on Bitnation. I would like to fix the article. However, when I use the copyright tool, it just shows me a few phrases that are copied such "father was stateless" or "Decentralized Borderless Voluntary Nation" - things that cannot be changed. I did not intend to plagiarise. How do I fix the article so that it is no more copyright infringement?

Plechette — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plechette Dey (talk • contribs) 13:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to place the copyright issue tag on the article again, please do explain what is the issue on the talk page so that I can fix. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plechette Dey (talk • contribs) 11:12, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randi Rhodes Name

Randi Rhodes birth name was Buten, not Bueten. How is correcting this fact 'not constructive'? Your removal of the change is 'not constructive'. How do you know her name is Bueten, and not Buten? MrSativa (talk) 22:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrSativa (talk • contribs)

I didn't see the no source(s) ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 22:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Hi. Jumping from a #1 warning to a #4 warning [like you did here] is a bit fast. Admins might say the user has not been properly warned, especially since most edits weren't clear vandalism. Also, keep WP:BITE in mind. Kind regards. Yintan 09:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure looks like edit testing. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 09:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you're unsure that's all the more reason to be a little careful with level 4 vandalism warnings. Kind regards, Yintan 09:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Junior5a! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:39, Saturday, October 8, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

User talk pages

People are allowed to blank most things including warnings on their talk pages. Such as on User talk:FruitSalad Removal of talk from one's talk page is taken to indicate that it has been read. Please do not restore. See WP:BLANKING Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hello, before reporting editors to AIV could you ensure they have been adequately warned (i.e. level 4) and have then continued the vandalism/disruption. I am having to decline many of your reports there. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Junior5a, I owe you this barnstar for giving your time, your service, and your talent towards recent changes patrolling and for reverting vandalism. Thank you. It's a huge help and it makes a big difference to the integrity of the project. Keep it up, dude!!!! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awwwww Thank you! <3 ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 05:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Extracts from the Film A Hard Day's Night. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Stop creating pages with sock templates or even adding sock templates to userpages. It's not your job.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that about. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 21:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, per WP:DENY, stop. Sock tags give the troll the attention they want. Sro23 (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Junior5a. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a rollbacker

Hi Junior5a! After reviewing your recent contributions with patrolling vandalism and your AIV reports, I thought you could use the rollback flag on your account - so I went ahead and gave it to you. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Junior5a, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
I'm Sorry about the disruptive edits.

Dick Van Dyke

It is very common in Wikipedia articles to show if someone's spouse is significantly older or younger. I did not intend vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CC:C701:A3D8:913B:D2F8:A903:FDFB (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Junior5a!

Happy New Year!

Junior5a,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Cheers! ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 04:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your help today! Patient Zero^talk 13:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does "unconstructive" mean?

Can you let me know which specific Wikipedia rules and guidelines are violated when you say an edit is "unconstructive" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.22.23 (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gay edit

Thanks for the heads up, appreciated. Not sure I understand why it's unconstructive? Elaborates on reasons for rejecting the gay label. There is something of a movement among some gays in entertainment, publishing, fashion, etc., to reject being labeled gay. John Mulholland is a prominent example of an openly gay man who chooses to reject being labeled gay, not because he is ashamed, he is openly gay. It is a subject which is becoming more openly discussed within the gay arena. Suspect that Mulholland and other gays like him will prove to be something of a trend. Collier09 (talk) Collier09 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Burke

The section title mentioned her international breakthrough. Such a thing was not discussed in the text. So I removed it from the title. Please tell me why this was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.151.137.100 (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walkaway

The Cast song is famous and memorable because of its use as a sign off on England's Euro 96 exit by the BBC. What is your problem with my edit? Here go to number 8 http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/articles/cb2f00a9-d67f-4ec8-84ca-e976e8248222 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.207.129.53 (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five planet treaty

Hi. I declined your A7 as it's a fictional organisation and A7 only applies to real people, animals and organisations. (An organisation OF animals would probably be a hoax...) I've prodded it as I can find nothing on Google. It'll probably end up at AfD, so keep an eye on it. Peridon (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logan ThirtyAcre

Well, my AFD nomination probably doesn't matter, because the copyright violation comes first. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for Deletion Inquiry

Hello. You have a new message at Theyoungeditor123's talk page. Theyoungeditor123 (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Theyoungeditor123[reply]

Frank J. Brown

In nominating this for deletion, you somewhat cryptically wrote: "Cannot any sources did not pass Wp:Bio." You were too hasty here. Assuming you meant you could not find any sources, I did find several pretty easily. Perhaps you could withdraw your nomination. Jonathunder (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your message.

She's the same person. She's already on there as Jessica Carr. What you were doing was re-adding the same person to the list. If you look at your edit, you can tell that her real name's the same. Kennadi and Jessica are the same person, but different ring names.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Junior5a. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deleted my page and the redirect

um, it's an actual person, who is still living, and their sister has a wiki page. what's the issue with the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.41.159 (talk) 02:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think your draft needs more and link. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 02:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

This is a public school's IP. Excuse the Vandalism from unfunny children. 47.19.130.154 (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Template:Deprecated shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Also, see WP:CIR. Your grammar is atrocious. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 03:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? You are likely changing icon why not stop that? ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 04:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Junior5a reported by User:Lojbanist (Result: ). Thank you. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 04:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Deprecated template. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
WP:CIR. en-0 = eventual and inevitable indefblock. I recommend the app "Duolingo". Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 18:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you stop threatening me about unless icon. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 18:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Template:Deprecated template. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Templates are not extempt from 3RR. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 18:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to harassing you. I suggest you would be stop changing icon?

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Template:Deprecated template has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Stop harassing me. I have a feeling that you're the "punches you again" guy. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 18:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 18:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Template:Deprecated template. WP:CIR WP:BOLD WP:DEW WP:BIKESHED Lojbanist ^{remove cattle from stage} 18:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Junior5a. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny McCoy ...Aiken Barracks

Hi

The information on Aiken barracks is incorrect ...Johnny McCoy was second in command of the fourth northern division and led the command to releases Frank Aiken not Mr Quinn..... (Johnny was Franks confidant throughout life) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomFeighery (talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Price (boxer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michig, looks like that may have been unintentional by Junior5a: notice that their edit was a revert of an edit tagged "possible BLP issue or vandalism". --Pipetricker (talk) 11:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was unclearly warning for me. It's just a little error isn't it? ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 11:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AeroCóndor

Dear friend, I may not be able to handle this medium well. My intention was to adapt the article to the international pages. I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EBAQ (talk • contribs) 10:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback regarding revert

Hello, Junior5a. You have new messages at MrQueeba's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radha_Stirling

HI, I have edited this page as it is wholly unsourced and reads like marketing material of the Subject. Wiki is nota marketing book. If i have not done this correctly please advise how i direct the editor attention and flag that this article has been written by a party, now removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinwatch (talk • contribs) 19:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I Suggest you take to new WP:AFD for the deletion. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 19:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor please can you recommend how this is then done. The article is misrepresentation and false and in breach of wiki rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinwatch (talk • contribs) 19:48, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Radha Stirling / Detained in Dubai

This page has been written by the subject and their PR company. This is not the purpose of Wiki. The pages are wholly unsourced content. I have deleted the unsourced content twice, you have reverted it. why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinwatch (talk • contribs) 19:46, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because you're blanking unexplained about without WP:AFD for the deletion.~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 19:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI, i thought i gave clear reason for the deletion. The page majority unsourced. As you can clearly see might i ask for your assistance then in removing the unsourced content in the appropriate way. Many thanks in advance. I wasn't aware that Wiki should be allowed by people to promote them selves and business with false unsourced information as Ms Radah Stirling and Detained in Dubai appear to be doing. even the editor that created the pages has been deleted. Clearly paid for. Surely this is against everything Wiki stands for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinwatch (talk • contribs) 19:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

/* References */

Hello, Junior5a. You have new messages at Anshublogger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I inserted a external link on your page named: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_international_relations. This article was all about international relations and my article: https://meri-life.in/, was all about china relationship with India and other countries and also about it International politics. So, do you not think that it has not anything to do with international relationship.

Reported the wrong person

2a00:23c4:888a:cb00:f888:12c1:2c60:86f4 (talk · contribs) wasn't vandalizing anything. They were reverting vandalism. Please check the revision history. You've reported the wrong person. Bmf 051 (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was my mistake sorry that about. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Cheers. Bmf 051 (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you for marking the pages created by DaltoReborn for deletion! Breawycker (talk to me!) 03:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no chat!

I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I miss seeing you, and that I was thinking about you... :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course i'm not dead yet :) ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 14:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]