User talk:Redtigerxyz

Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review

Hi, I see that you are an active member of Peer-review Team .I was wondering if you guys can review all Peer review nominations in Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Article_alerts rather than having people search this specific page to get a Peer review done?There are a lot of articles waiting for Peer Review there .Is there any need for a different page for the same? --Vinay84 (talk) 07:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

PR

V need to finalise a user 4 the PR so v can go ahead asa the current issues r sorted - wch wil b soon. I was thinking of requesting Hamiltonstone for the same as he is now acquainted with the subject. What do u think? Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 17:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

With Abecedare kindly obliging, v hv r work cut out .. do u think 1 view is enough or as World suggested, v hv 2 ppl do it? Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 11:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I wil try n work on tht. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 11:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Iv juz corrected the Williams refs if thts wht u mean. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 16:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

To the best of my knowledge he wanted sum1 to ans the questions to his satisfaction. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 16:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

India based article hence british english is the order of the day. as for the iast it is iast of wikidas's wierd sp! m slightly tied up this week n may nt edit much .. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 20:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Greetings on the festive occasion. I do apologise, I hv been tied up with commitments in the last mo n hv been quite inactive. I will try and make some time to clear stuff from the pr list in the nxt few days once the festive season passes. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 21:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

kataka/karka

Kataka, is most commonly used term for cancer sign, changed since people can understand. Im sorry.. i should have editted like this karka or kataka.

Prashanth.V 04:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure.. i have one doubt. i sign in talk pages and discussions in articles. Do we need to sign in article edition also?. but in signature it is mentioned in not to do.. Or we have any separate area to sign in case of editting article. please adivice on this.

--Prashanth.V (talk) 06:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi..

I have contributed to an article named Thirukkadigai, but now the article is washed out. many contents that existed previously were also removed, can you please look into that and help out in resuming.

- Prashanth.V (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

PR

I will be glad to take a look at it, though it will take me a few days. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 11:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Red, I noticed that Ruhrfisch just added his comments at the review page and that my earlier comments are being worked on. Would you like me to wait till you are substantially done with these before taking another look at the article, or would you prefer me to do that (essentially) now ? Either way will work for me, and its real nice to see the PR system working so well for this article. Abecedare (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. I'll add my comments and suggestions about article organization in the next day or so on the article talk page, and will the nitty-gritty bits about grammar, MOS etc for the next round of review. By the way, I have no concerns about the pace of response to the PR comments - unlike an FAC, or even GA, there is no real deadline here. Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Anuradhapura Kingdom

Hi, Redtigerxyz! I have a question regarding one of your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Anuradhapura Kingdom/archive1. Could you please let me know what you think? ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 06:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanx!

Thanks so much for your suggestions, Redtigerxyz!! I really appreciate them. But I did not want it to rech GA-class yet. I just asked whether 2003 Afro-Asian Games is ready to be titled as a B-class article. If it is so, plz change the info in the talk page for your respective WikiProject.

Thanks again. Any more suggestions are welcome.

Incidentally, the first point you mentioned - about controversial statements. If you see the paragraph in the article, you will find numerous references, with the same number. I meant that the content of the whole passage came from that reference. Should I repeat the reference again?

Ankitbhatt (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

LGBT Themes

I hope I'm on the right track with fixes based on your POV concerns. I'm kind of in the dark about nuance in the subjects being discussed, and appreciate that you have assumed good faith with my edits. Thanks.

I'd very much like to hear you views about GA'ing this article. --Nemonoman (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Re : Kanhopatra

Hello tiger, could not find anything interesting related to Kanhopatra on jstor / springer; But I found one good journal article which can be used to improve the Vithoba temple, Pandharpur article. "The Vithoba Faith of Maharastra: he Vithoba Temple of Pandharpur nd Its Mythological Structure" Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 1988 1512-5. This also has maps of Vithoba temple, which we can create and add; I am fairly well versed with inkscape, if you want to create the SVG map images let me know. --Nvineeth (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Map of Vithoba Temple Pandharpur.svg has been created; Will create the other one when I get time. --Nvineeth (talk) 17:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Fixed the information and speiling mistaike. --Nvineeth (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I have bolded the caption and numbers; Also reduced the empty space. Looks better now. --Nvineeth (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

It will be good we can get a picture / painting or rather of a statue in any of Pandharpur's temples. --Nvineeth (talk) 07:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I meant probably a image like File:Vithoba Punadalik Tukaram Dnyaneshwar.jpg of Kanhopatra, if it exists somewhere. --Nvineeth (talk) 16:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Bali Padyami

Hi!

I have drafted an article at User:Nvvchar/sandbox/Tungnath for posting on DYK under the Special occasion holding area for the Bali Padyami festival coming up on 19th October 2009. I thought that you, as an expert on Hinduism subjects, should have a look at it for copy editing and any addtions for nominating it with a suitable hook on DYK. Pl let me know what you feel about it.Thanks--Nvvchar (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt action. Your editing is very fine. Shall I move it now to main space? I suggest the following hook for your nomination on the DYK with an img (in infobox).--that acording to Hindu mythology, Bali Padyami commemorates victory of god Vishnu in his dwarf incarnation Vamana, defeating asura king Bali, and pushing him to the nether world? You are welocome to use a different hook--Nvvchar (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Should we not move it today to Mainspace and then DYK under the Special occasion holding area (atleast 7 days in advance)?--Nvvchar (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Shall I, as usual, make it a joint artcile?--Nvvchar (talk) 02:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I have moved the article to main space. I would appreciate your jointly nominating it on the DYK. One more suggestion for the hook. ...that Bali Padyami (pictured)is the third day of Dipavali, the Hindu festival of lights celebrated in honour of the notional return of the demon (asura)-king Bali to earth? --Nvvchar (talk) 03:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Your suugestion is fine. Please go ahead and post it on DYK as a joint article. Thanks.--Nvvchar (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you RedtigerXYZ (since I do not know your first name). --Nvvchar (talk) 08:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Bhagavad Gita

Could you pls respond here : Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Lead_image ? Nvineeth (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Dussehra

Hi, I notice that last year you changed the redirect Dussehra from Dasara to Vijayadashami. The latter says that it is the same as Dasara anyway. I have no prior knowledge of the subject, but propose to merge all to Dasara -- would this be wrong? - Fayenatic (talk) 16:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Redtigerxyz. You have new messages at Fayenatic london's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Imperial Triple Crown

Your majesty, it gives me great pleasure to bestow these Imperial triple crown jewels upon Redtigerxyz for your contributions to Indian articles in the areas of WP:DYK, WP:GA, and WP:FC. Well done, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Balipratipada

Hello! Your submission of Balipratipada at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Kali puja

I have no way of determining that today is the day of Kali puja, since the description on Hindu months on wikipedia is pretty confusing. Gatoclass (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, I confirmed it on google, and promoted the hook. Gatoclass (talk) 07:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kali Puja

On October 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kali Puja, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC) 09:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Checking?

I have no idea what you want me to check (as per my talk page). DS (talk) 11:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Balipratipada

On October 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Balipratipada, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Bencherlite^Talk 21:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The Indian Barnstar of National Merit

		The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
		Awarded to Redtigerxyz for getting several Hinduism / India related articles to GA and FA status.Keep up the good work! -- Tinu Cherian - 13:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Redtigerxyz. You have new messages at Talk:Akbar the Great.
Message added SBC-YPR (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Greetings

Hi! Redtiger Hearty congratulations on the Imperial Triple Crown award bestowed on you. You fully deserve it.--Nvvchar (talk) 02:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Removing referenced material

You have removed referenced material from Akbar the Great page without giving any justification. This is considered vandalism. Hope you will develop consensus on the talk page and justify your edits. Thanks. More random musing (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Bhadrakali.jpg

File:Bhadrakali.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Bhadrakali.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Bhadrakali.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Please look at this.

[1] Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Kanhopatra SVG

I will try to construct the SVG of Kanhopatra. Though I am not an expert in inkscape, I will try my best. Will get back to you in another week or so, busy with off-wiki karma --Nvineeth (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Prabodhini Ekadashi

Hello! Your submission of Prabodhini Ekadashi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 ^talk 16:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Dravidian language

Hi! Redtiger,

On my talk page I gave English version of another img in the article. But you need equivalents in the img which is in Telugu language. I am giving belwo the translation of the heading of each of the nine pictures in the img. I hope it would suffice your requirment.--Nvvchar (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC) In the order as depicted in the img (vertical as in the image). All are in Telugu script.

1. Guru (Jupiter)
2. Budha(Mercury)
3. Shukra (Venus)
4. Kuja (Mars)
5. Rahu (Moon’s northern nod)
6. Chandra (Moon)
7. Ravi (Sun)
8. Ketu (Moon’s south node)
9. Shani (Saturn)

The names of the spouses of planets in the same order as above are as below.

Tara
Ila
Dwarjaswini
Jwalini
Karali
Rohini
Sanjya or Chaya
Dhumra
Jyesthadevi

Yes, the names are as carved on the plaque.--Nvvchar (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

---

• 1 - Bṛhaspati (Guruvu/Jupiter)on the plaque
• 2 - Budha (Budhudu/Mercury)
• 3 - Shukra (Shukrudu/Venus)
• 4 - Mangala (Kujudu/Mars)
• 5 - Rahu (Rahuvu/North Lunar Node)
• 6 - Chandra (Chandrudu/Moon)
• 7 - Surya (Ravi/Sun)
• 8 - Ketu (Kethuvu/South Lunar Node)
• 9 - Shani (Sani/Saturn)

---

I noticed your message on Nvvchar's talk. Yes, the wives names are mentioned. Bhudha's wife is mentioned as Ila. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi again!

Hi Redtiger! It's ben a really long time since we last chatted. Hope ur doing fine.

Like the last time, I come now asking you for your suggestions on how to improve the article 2003 Afro-Asian Games (you might remeber that I had created it). The craze that I had for this article died down within me, and I decided to take a WikiBreak, as some people advised. I am now back in action, with a lot of enthusiasm.

If you can point out any corrections and improvements, please do n ot hesitate to tell me.

Yours,

Ankitbhatt (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

umm

I'll see what I can do... but after running DYK yesterday for 24 hours plus I was thinking of giving it a rest. Lots of room for others to contribute in approving hooks etc and filling the prep areas. I guess you have already done this? I'll go and look Victuallers (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I.m very confused. The hook seems to say "today" and it said that before two days ago ... also if it loaded now then it may go today as I won't be checking its progress. Can you clarify? Victuallers (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I have left some comments on your submissions at the DYK suggestions page. Gatoclass (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

If we add your "hook" to the Did you know queue now, then it will be shown on 2 November and not today (1 November). It's only added to the queue and not actually added to the Main Page yet. I hope that clears things up for you. Jolly Ω Janner 22:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou for providing the cite Redtiger. I have now promoted your articles, which will appear Nov. 2. However, in future please ensure your submissions conform properly with DYK rules - specifically in this case, the rule which states that The nomination's hook must contain a fact cited in the article. In other words, if your hook states that festival x begins on day y, you must include that fact in the article, with cite, so that reviewers can check it and confirm it. You can't expect reviewers to go ploughing through all your references trying to figure out which one if any contains the appropriate info. Hope that helps to clear things up. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 06:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you've got the dates, but they aren't cited. Anyhow, it's all resolved now. Just as long as you cite them properly next time. Thanks for the submissions. Gatoclass (talk) 06:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I suggest you talk to the OTD regulars about that. I only rarely participate in that project. Gatoclass (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Tulsi Vivah

On November 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tulsi Vivah, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 01:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Prabodhini Ekadashi

On November 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Prabodhini Ekadashi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 07:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kartik Poornima

On November 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kartik Poornima, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 07:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Ila (Hinduism)

Using Devanagari script for differentiating between Ila and Ilā should be avoided, since Devanagari has no monopoly over Sanskrit, Sanskrit was written in Brahmi, Siddhamatrika and Sharada scripts in ancient and medieval period, and later almost in all modern Indian scripts. That's why I used IAST, the standard alphabets for Sanskrit transliteration. V.S. Mishra has given the reference of RV X.95.19 and SB XI.5.1, for the rest I am adding links to the Griffith's translation soon.Joy1963 (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Devanagari=Sanskrit?

In any article, if the word Devanagari is replaced by Sanskrit, it is a misnomer, that you should also agree, as a script can not be equated with a language (just as Cyrillic is not Russian). If in any other article also, this is written, it is better to correct them.Joy1963 (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Orissa -> Odisha

The re-naming doesn't seem to be official yet. Despite the headline, the TOI article says:

... the change in nomenclature was approved by the Union Cabinet on Wednesday without discussion. It will get Parliament's nod soon enough.
The proposed change will now require an amendment to the first and eighth schedule of the Constitution which is likely to come up in Parliament soon.

I suggest we wait before we begin using the proposed name on wikipedia; perhaps a sentence can be added to the Orissa article mentioning this proposal though. As far as Oriya goes, I wonder if GOI even has the standing (as far as wikipedia goes!) to rename a language, although the alternate name is again worth mentioning. Thoughts ? Abecedare (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I have also posted here. Abecedare (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Kanhopatra

I will definately review the article. By the what happened to Swaminarayan article?--Anish (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

With my limited FA experience, much of what I wanted to say has been added by Abecedare, I mainly feel that sources from the temples might be questioned for FA. Will add my tweaks as it progress. All the best. --TheMandarin (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Thnx

Noticed u r banner for citations in the article Tourism in Puducherry Thanks for the review. i have added citations and references. please review the article. thanks Varun_swm

Lokprabha etc

Just adding here, instead of at the PR since adding to the thread there may get confusing.
I know that Lokprabha is a notable magazine, and that is the reason I added the parenthetical "redlink!" at the PR. It was supposed to mean: "Wow! This is a redlink, and needs to be an article"; and certainly not, "This is a redlink and therefore not a reliable source". I realize now that my personal shorthand was too cryptic and open to misinterpretation.
That aside, the point with regards to Maharashtra Times and Lokprabha is not that they are not reliable sources per se, but whether they are authoritative sources on a subject that is not news, current affairs, or even a contemporary personality. This distinction is not important on wikipedia in general, but in recent times can be a central concern at FACs (for example, see discussion here, or at this failed FAC). As you say, some of the issues can be resolved by reducing redundant citations to popular media sources, but I think for the successful (and painless!) FA, we will need to show that all the central and high-quality sources on the subject have been consulted by the authors. This is especially true since the article is relatively short and only limited information on the subject is available.
Let me know if I can help with any of this; if you are looking for a particular book/article, I can try searching up my library for it. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 16:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanx

Thanks for reviewing the article[Tourism in Puducherry]. I have made some changes in the article. please take a look when time permits. thank u. Varun_swm