Jump to content

User talk:Ritchie333

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phyllis Rosser (talk | contribs) at 15:50, 30 April 2015 (→‎Thank you from the Ceres Gallery: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Keeping an eye on stuff. Meanwhile, here is some music.

Adminship

A prehistoric administrator spots some complete bollocks and breaks out his banhammer.

Ritchie, have you ever thought about becoming an admin someday? Given how you've had lots of editing experience, quality article work, and good judgement, I don't think you'd have too much trouble at RFA should you decide to run. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Snuggs. Well I suppose the cat's out of the bag, I have been having secret talks with MelanieN and we've dug through my contributions. What's stopping me from being an admin? Well, I have a few skellies (I believe I told an admin to fuck off once), a lot of my experiences aren't logged (it would be interested to capture AFD / CSD "saves" though) and I need extra work and responsibility like a hole in the head. Still, I've been doing forum moderation on / off for about 20 years and have seen it all (hence my involvement today at ANI trying to find a resolution that doesn't involve WP:NLT banhammers at 12 o'clock), so I dare say I might well have a shot at the bit at some point. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The most versatile phrase in the English language Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As long as you know what you're doing, things should be fine. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I feel you ought to know that "skellie" redirects here, haha. But you must be joking! I'd see telling any admin to fuck off a necessary trophy. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie has done his best to wiggle out of it, but his excuses have collapsed, one by one. His destiny awaits him. --MelanieN (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How about a little test: what would you potential admin say at arbitration enforcement where I was called today? - I once linked to Bollocks. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A long time ago, I wrote It's not the end of the world and my rose-tinted opinion of what I'd like to see at AE is contained therein. And for what it's worth, I linked the current picture in Wikipedia:Complete bollocks after the old one got deleted. PS: A number of off-wiki friends like that last page, but wonder why the "is" was missing between "Wikipedia" and "Complete" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was recently told what AE stands for which is unprintable. Now to the specific instance, how would you potential admin comment? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Test passed: quick, to the point, giving people not too much to read, with a twist of humour ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Hey, this is good news; I agree it sounds like a good fit; let me know if you need me to testify as a character witness at your trial! Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please, or were you speaking to Ritchie? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You too? You dear thing, yes I will testify how annoying you are and how I see you EVERYWHERE. ;-) Ping me on that day. Prhartcom (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You misunderstood, sorry. - I don't mean admin (one of my ardent admirers phrased: to offer me to be admin would be like proposing the princess to become janitor, LOL, - and he reviewed an article for GA today), no, I mean the unprintable above, but thanks to Ritchie I think this cup passed. The next will come, I bet, you heard it here first, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Please excuse our friend Gerda - she thinks she's trapped in a Kafka novel...) Martinevans123 (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trapped ;) - Recently, I reverted the addition of Cat:Surrealist to Kafka, thinking that he realistically wrote "the story of a [wo]man arrested and prosecuted by a remote, inaccessible authority, with the nature of his her crime revealed neither to him her nor the reader". Excessively proud of that most successful TFA so far, look for Kafka in my user's infobox, just above criminal penalty ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch! Sorry Gerda, only joking. I thought I might hit a nerve with that one! Martinevans123 (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You simply nailed it, or should I say "revealed"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can't emphasise this enough - for an outside non-editing reader's point of view, a GA beats the mop hands down. Ich danke Sie für sein gut artikel. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feel a bit bad now; I seem to recall you and I had a chat about this ooh, years ago now (can't even dig up the diffs), and I said I'd look into it and then sort of... didn't. Sorry. Still, if you need a co-nom, give me a shout, I'd be very happy to sign my name under your bid for the bit. Yunshui 雲水 14:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did, but to be honest I focused more on writing content, and the "prize" I really had my eye on last year was getting an article through FAC single handedly, but I think that's going to have to be dropped for now. As I said to Melanie elsewhere, at the moment the timing is not good - I am planning to give up some long standing mod / developer roles on other sites to accomodate this, which is scheduled to happen at the end of April. Then there will be full on band stuff for quite a while. So, WP:NOTNOW, but conversely, not never. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So not "full on banned stuff", then. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at the workload .... definitely looking forward to the Lifeboat gig on 23 April as the owner is happy for me to use his refurbished Hammond C3 with Leslie 122. Ding dong! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Give my regards to Mandy. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly enough, I found myself doing considerably more content work once I had the admin tools; most of my GAs and sole FA were cobbled together after I had the mop in hand. They made a pleasant distraction from the less-enjoyable aspects of administration... Yunshui 雲水 14:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I remember the peace bell with pleasure. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry sorry - something got lost in my last edit, and then more was added, cant restore properly, help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie's just too cool to be an admin!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GA congrats from GA, - our day today ;) (signed late, sorry, - DYK that Ika was the first GA in outcomes 2015?) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like a very appropriate article to pass GA right now - one in the eye for systemic bias, I hope. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the interests of equality and countering systemic bias, I plan to block all accounts beginning with "A" on the first day, then "B" on the second ... moving on, though I might get into some bother when I get to day 10 and block Jimbo ... seriously though, I've booted people off forums and wikis before and been called everything from a nazi to an anal retentive jerk - even with the full support and weight of consensus behind me doing it. It's not fun to find people you've never talked to suddenly declare you as a sworn enemy. Booting people for personal or political reasons is a particularly nasty bit of cowardice - "I can't come to terms with your views so I'm going to throw you out of the door and stick my fingers in my ears singing la la la can't hear you...." (In your specific instance, I would have dropped a note onto the IP edit warring on Mohonk Preserve pointing out what vandalism isn't and that "2 hours" is POV depending on whether you are in a car, a pushbike, a 44 tonner, a Segway, a Sinclair C5 or a fire extinguisher-powered wheelchair and if they reverted again, I would probably sigh, say "whatever" and go to bed. Just sayin'....) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Walnut tree?
- you must be nuts"

In blocking, will you go by account name or last name? - My admin of choice wrote a good-bye note, - your service may be needed soon, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh who knows ... tell you what, it might be easier to just block everybody in the whole world. Would keep the traffic at ANI down a bit. And noooooo, she can't leave, please, next thing you know Drmies will call it quits and then I'll just feel depressed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support, per nom. Drmies (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

GA's latest Bach GA is on the Main page, DYK? Ending on "final grant us peace", quite intentionally so. Before you proceed direction admin: ask yourself: Am I passionate? In case of yes, I warn you. Am I passionate about justice? In case of yes, stay away, or you might end up in a self block. I saw two, and that's two too many. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I silently cheer from the sidelines when Wikipediocracy fires both barrels at an admin doing silly things, that's good enough for me. I have occasionally commented on the blog eg: "Long-term editors and admins can get so caught up in what they do that they gain a false sense of self-importance, not realising that they may never read important criticism and feedback" [1] Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quote but no consolation. But then I quote "He who speaks a word of consolation ..." on my user page. - Did you know that yesterday someone mentioned readers as the most important people of Wikipedia? Imagine!! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When an admin behaves like a complete arse, all I really want them to do is realise they are behaving like a complete arse. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What if an admin only looses patience and explodes? Did you follow the link to justice? How do you like my translation? Approved for DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are worse things to explode. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Woolwich Ferry

Been there, done that, got the....

The article Woolwich Ferry you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Woolwich Ferry for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know my reviews can be a bit gruelling, but it's all for the sake of maintaining the integrity of that little green blob, which I fought so hard for. Eric Corbett 18:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well other people might think that but I welcome people doing a good and thorough job. As a software engineer, you won't survive in the trade very long if you take bug reports personally! Crisco 1492 has done a similar level of quality reviewing (he would have pounced on that map image as the first thing, probably) and the opening gambit of Hammond organ's GA review (which more or less started off as "what kind of section layout is this and would you care to explain all these technical terms while you're at it?") made a far better article at the end of it - which is exactly the result we should be aiming for. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Missed it, congrats! Also had another little green ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've got a little bet with myself which I'll reach first - 30,000 edits (currently on 29,500) or 40 GAs (currently 38, plus 2 queued). Hmmmm... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Selling England by the Pound

The article Selling England by the Pound you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Selling England by the Pound for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Show me that I'm everywhere, and get me home for tea …"

Hi Ritchie. I wonder if I could borrow you and your copy of Lewisohn's Sessions for a couple of refs at "It's All Too Much"? You may remember I'd intended to work on Break-up of the Beatles – problem was, the more I looked into factors contributing to the break-up (McCartney's often-unwelcome assertiveness; Harrison's growth as a songwriter; Beatles post-Epstein, MMT, Maharishi/TM in India; Apple, Northern Songs, Klein, etc) and the relevant album & topical articles for the period back to 1966, the more … Well, let's say the more distracted I became. For now I seem to have settled on a pretty straightforward acid freakout: "It's All Too Much". There are some points made there cited to Beatles Bible currently, but they clearly come from Lewisohn. So I'd be very grateful if you could check with his book for statements such as:

  • "The track had the working title of 'Too Much'."
  • "Referring to the relaxed nature of the De Lane Lea sessions, Mark Lewisohn writes that Lennon and McCartney's backing vocals "started to waver a little, the chanted 'too much' eventually becoming 'tuba' and then 'Cuba'. It was that sort of a song."
  • Also, MacDonald gives 26 May for the second session, yet it looks like Lewisohn goes with 31 May?
  • Any mention of when handclaps and Ringo's tambo were recorded perhaps?

Sorry to lay this on you, R. Quite understand if you're thinking: "Mañana, baby." (No no, not the seminal 1972 Bay City Rollers hit …) JG66 (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, I am ploughing through Selling England by the Pound at the moment, but when that's done I'll put out my Lewisohn (oo-er) and have a look. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Big thanks, no rush. JG66 (talk) 10:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, @JG66:, here are the answers. All the information you require is on Lewisohn's Sessions on page 112. The track sheet refers to it as "Too Much", the "that sort of song quote" is the last thing on the page, the second session was 26 May, and the percussion (it doesn't specifically say tambourine but everyone knows Ringo overdubbed tambourine on Beatles tracks more times than I've had hot dinners) and handclaps were recorded then. The third session on 2 June is on page 116, with David "High note on Penny Lane" Mason on trumpet, three other trumpeters, and a bass clarinet (and a partridge in a pear tree?) Harrison ran the session. So there you go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're a star – thank you so much. At the risk of really trying your patience, I don't suppose Lewisohn has anything for those currently unsupported statements regarding the song's mixes? Or any comment about "too much" being a then in-vogue term meaning mind-blowingly good? No probs if not. With that last item, I can always cite this about.com piece – somewhat undistinguished as far as sources go, but the author, Robert Fontenot, has been identified at our Album Sources as being RS among the many contributors to about.com. Big thanks again. JG66 (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JG66: - This isn't trying my patience, if you want to do that, try changing the genres in The Beatles (album)'s infobox yet again ... but seriously, Lewisohn p.112 says take 10 was chosen for mixing, and that George Martin wasn't around, Geoff Emerick assuming de facto production duties. Meanwhile, MacDonald 1997 (first revised edition) p. 228 says Harrison was "drug-mesmerised" and "under the influence of LSD". Then Lewisohn p. 128 talks about the 12 October mixing session at De Lane Lea by Martin (while the Beatles were doing Magical Mystery Tour background music), then p.162 mentions the 16 October 1968 remix to go on Yellow Submarine. Does that help? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aargh, I'd seen that start up again at Talk:White Album. (Have to say, "rock, pop" seems kinda bland when one thinks of the obvious developments from the Pepper era – eg, blues rock, folk/country. But then I saw the caped crusader arrive at the album talk page, so …Moving on, people, moving on.)
Thanks for those Lewisohn dates for the "Too Much" mixes, that's great. I'd always suspected that the other mixing info given in the article was OR-ish – and it'll have to go unless something comes to light (maybe about the 2009 reissue). Seems that you and I have the same edition of MacDonald; from what I can see he's talking about the song/recording being "drug-mesmerised" – I've included his (always generous!) opinion under Reception. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it is a bit strange I've carried on citing the 1997 First Revised Edition rather than the 2003 Second Revised Edition that's on Google Books, but it's because the second edition specifically states it revised things from (amongst other places) Miles' Many Years From Now which in places reads like McCartney trying to rewrite history. And even then, McCartney has still said stuff is wrong. In any case, McDonald's POV is blatant, so it's easy to dodge. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enthiran PR

Hi, I am Ssven2. I had recently taken this film article starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai to GA status and nominated it for FAC, but it was withdrawn due to WP:PUNC and MOS:LQ issues, most of which have now been resolved. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving additional comments about any prose issues and any copyediting left to be resolved at the article's 2nd PR. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note. To be perfectly honest, GA is about the extent of my writing capabilities, I've given FA a go from the sidelines but that's about all I can handle, and I try and get MOS issues right but they just seem too much like hard work when you don't know how to use Visual Editor. Anyway, @Dr. Blofeld: might be able to assist. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grayson Perry memorial Easter Egg section

Was the President of the United States a cross dresser? Or not? ... well, at least he wasn't Welsh, eh?
Please use in case of extreme cases of sense of humour failure. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Never have a slanging match on ANI, onlookers will not be able to tell you're not a drama whore. Did you know that I'd quite like to take Rhonda to the Rhondda ... just to get a shot of us having an ice cream on the top of the A4061 (either the Bwlch-y-Clawdd or the Rhigos Road, I know them both well), then I can upload it with a caption "Croeso y Rhonda" or something like that. Sorry, I'm mistaking Wikipedia for Facebook again... stop it Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And who are you calling a whore, you great slapper?! Martinevans123 (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see your Hee Haw and raise you an Argument clinic. (No you won't, yes I will, no I don't) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see your Hee Haw and I'll raise you a Haw Haw. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What is this, Storage Hunters? Scary people Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see it as more akin to this cultural gem. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Who Sell Out, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Luxembourg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What a dog's breakfast! Radio Luxembourg (English) should be merged with Radio Luxembourg (DRM) and become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Snake Pass

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Snake Pass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar
Thank you! I was really impressed by the constructive and non-acrimonious tone and contributions from everyone involved in the recent AFD discussion on the Alliance of Women Directors article. What could have been—with the wrong editors involved—a very nasty debate, turned into a very positive discussion. Even editors who strongly felt that the article should be deleted worked hard to find sources and fix problems with it. This is the kind of positive collaboration people don't hear a lot about in Wikipedia-land and I'd like to recognize it. Carl Henderson (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Selling England by the Pound

The article Selling England by the Pound you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Selling England by the Pound for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a user who may need a friend

hello Richie (if i may call you that) this is dfrr. i would like to imform you about this user named User:Trimethylxanthine. he has not been getting messages from anyone but me. in fact he has only gotten one message from one other user. User:StuRat User:Davejohnsan User:Conifer User:MrWooHoo and many other users have gotten a message like this from e. so lets not send this user messages out of pity. lets send hi messages like barnstars and wikiloves to make hi feel welcome and make sure that he knows that other users know about him. thank you and have a good aprilDfrr (talk) 07:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you have good intentions, but I don't think this was a good idea. Fundamentally our main aim is to write an encyclopedia. Trimethylxanthine hasn't done much recently other than make a good edit here on Reverse Polish notation. People may be busy with jobs, family, friends etc etc and not be able to commit to Wikipedia much. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A good way to catch newbie-biters

Delete your talk page. Some folks revert anything by a redlinked username. That's why I don't maintain a user page :-) Guy (Help!) 10:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is a good example of that. I'll admit I was a bit snarky in the edit summary (sorry!), but I knew the information added was factually correct (or at least verifiable) - how many other editors would have just gone "rv - unsourced" and walked away? And that's from a user who's not particularly a newbie, and (from their edit summaries) who understands at a real-world level what verification is, even if they don't know the magical voodoo incantations of <ref>{{cite web|url=blahblah.com|title=This|author=That|complexparameternobodyunderstands=TheOther .... }}</ref>. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A question to the floor, though - am I a bad Wikipedian because some vandalism makes me laugh? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia, the institution, has no sense of humor, as has been demonstrated many times. Wikipedians, the people, are human beings (thank God) and do have a sense of humor. (So does God.) Now that I am an admin I sometimes find myself laughing even as I hit "delete". --MelanieN (talk) 18:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Same here, Melanie. Ritchie, you are by no means alone or a "bad Wikipedian". Vandalism IS sometimes funny :P. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But most of the time it isn't nearly as funny as the vandal thought it was. Truly witty vandalism is rare. But when we do encounter it, there's nothing wrong with enjoying it (and then deleting it). --MelanieN (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What ticks me off is people adding vandalism for the express purpose of then posting an image or embedded imprint of it on Twitter or other social media. It then spreads around the internet before anybody can revert it. Urgh. :-/ (Of course, it also alerts Wikipedians who happen to see the posting to fix the thing [hopefully].) Softlavender (talk) 04:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This edit isn't vandalism, merely POV pushing ;-). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe so, but it still made me laugh! --MelanieN (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since rescuing articles to do with women in film seems to be a passtime of mine recently, could one of you lovely talk page stalkers (and Carl Henderson) please have a look at Anya Camilleri and see if you can give it a boost? It's barely an article but I don't think a "delete" at AfD would stick - we need a proper drive for sources first. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few things and tidied it up a little, but film articles aren't really my thing so I'm not sure if she meets the notability criteria or not. Borderline, I suspect. (What, are you saying Carl Henderson isn't lovely? 0;-D ) --MelanieN (talk) 15:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a weak keep now. Hopefully the creator will come back and write some more. I'm sure Carl is lovely, but hasn't stalked this page enough yet to be included in the "club". Paging Martinevans123 for obligatory bacon sandwich pun.... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not any sort of expert in the topic of women in film, but I will be happy to take a look at the Anya Camilleri page and see if I can dig up any more useful references. (I'm also afraid no one other than my dog considers me lovely). Carl Henderson (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've been able to add some content, including her earlier BBC TV movie "Two Golden Balls" and more information about "Satisfaction"—and the fact that it was never filmed, and on her marriage to her NY-LON and Satisfaction collaborator Simon Burke. I've found a bio at her agent's site, but am not sure if that would be considered a reliable source for basic biographical information. I'd appreciate some advice on that question. Carl Henderson (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant bit of policy is WP:SELFPUB, which is what I would think her agent's official biography falls under. You can add basic facts, such as what films or TV shows she was involved in, or schools attended, but not much else. A good way of looking at it is if you've ever been asked as a reference for a former co-worker, the sort of things you'd be allowed to say there are roughly the same as my interpretation of this policy - basic, uncontroversial facts. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I will limit any use of it to that level. Carl Henderson (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've completed substantial research and revisions to the Anya Camilleri article, and would appreciate it greatly, if you could review and comment. Thanks. Carl Henderson (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a look, and done a few copyedits, but the changes look good, Carl. Nice to see somebody else who likes rescuing bad speedies! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review and fixes. It was an interesting project, but I worried I might fall afoul of some obscure BLP rule, so I might have over-cited things. Carl Henderson (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great work, Carl, and welcome to the Heymann Club - an imaginary organization of people who don't just rescue articles but make them great. Ritchie is clearly the founder of this club, and I do what I can. (My latest A7-to-DYK effort is here: Huy Duc. Coming soon to a DYK near you.) I would like to nominate Anya for a DYK but I think I'm one day too late. Expansion started on April 5, it's now the 13th. Anyhow, I look forward to collaborating with you on lots of article rescues. --MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I didn't realize there was a time limit for DYKs. Well, Now I Know (NIK). Too bad really, there could have been an interesting one: "DYK: British television and film director Anya Camilleri's father is featured on the Maltese 10 Euro coin?" Let me know if you see an article you think I could help with in the future. Carl Henderson (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today's articles for improvement

You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 18 of 2015. Thanks for your consideration! North America1000 19:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Snake Pass

The article Snake Pass you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Snake Pass for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eric Corbett -- Eric Corbett (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I used to drive across the Snake Pass at least once a week in the summer when I worked in Sheffield, so your GA nomination jumped out at me. But even the Woodhead Pass wasn't reliable in the winter. I got stuck there once behind a lorry that had jack-knifed on the ice on its descent, which closed the road for hours. It's bitterly cold up there. Eric Corbett 21:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snake is a wonderful drive in the summer when you've got all the time in the world, but I can well believe that goes out of the window the minute commuting comes into it. This stuff didn't make the article, but back in the 70s, Joy Division and Human League used to trade gigs off each other, presumably so they didn't have to cart a full PA over the Pennines, and Hooky remembers travelling in a Transit (?) up Snake Pass towards Sheffield wondering if the van was actually going to survive to the top.
I also know a couple of freight drivers and I'm pretty sure the recommended route for any farms in Lincolnshire to the whole Greater Manchester area is via Sheffield and Woodhead, going via the M62 over Scammonden is just too out of the way and fuel heavy to be cost effective. So the whole road is bunged up with HGVs all the way through Longendale and Mottram. Coming the other direction along the M67 tells you everything you need to know about British transport policy - great fast road for a few miles, then it just gives up and dissolves into total crap. And as for the trains, great, let's reopen the Woodhead Tunnel, oh wait, it's full of electrical cables. Bugger. PS: Bit of a blast from the past for you Eric for seeing Sale, Greater Manchester as today's featured article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see that is your 40th GA! Congratulations! --MelanieN (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A personal favourite and a high point for the Yamaha keyboard, I feel. "Brian Matthew, you were right." Martinevans123 (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Had a feeling it might - I'd never heard of him before I researched the article! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What! You are joking?! "I Can't Go Back to Savoury Now" is "a heart-rending bittersweet tale of modern manners", by 'eck. There is something of the Jake Thackray about him, I think. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

HI, just got your note. Thanks for your help. I will take a look, and keep an eye out for further messages from you.

Best always,

Sabrina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabrinap2015 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabrinap2015: - I've made some more comments on Talk:Profiles in History and that's probably the best place to discuss improvements to the article. I hadn't heard of the place, but it certainly looks important enough for an article. I mentally pictured Jesse from Storage Hunters wandering in with a crate of old Marvel comics, asking "how much is this lot worth" repeatedly. Sorry, I'm rambling. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Pink Floyd band members (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Wright
Profiles in History (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Adventures of Superman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You smell. Smelly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Selling England by the Pound

Harrias talk 00:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you

"I've had enough of Noel Gallagher slagging me off. Let's see him play the drum parts to "Los Endos" - that'll shut him up."

Hi Ritchie333, it's great to hear from you! I do like to work on Yes/Genesis articles but my writing is never up to GA quality. First off, thank you for working on The Yes Album. I was amazed someone took it from the mess that it was to GA in such little time! You have a good, unique way of developing articles which I like. Nice development on Trick, and please feel free to work on Wind & Wuthering as like I said, my writing is not as succinct. Duke pains me as I had such a big edit going, with lots of references from the 2007 reissue interviews, only to have the whole thing swiped by power outage. This has happened to me far too many times. I guess little by little edits are the way forward for me now! I do have Bowler and Dray as well as the Genesis 2007 book, but I use articles from The Genesis Archive. LowSelfEstidle (talk) 14:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LowSelfEstidle: Thanks! I got Bowler and Dray book brand new (then lost it and bought another one second hand on eBay recently), around the time The Way We Walk, Volume Two: The Longs came out. I knew the 80s Genesis well from just hearing them all over the radio (you could be living as a rock hermit and you'd still hear Phil Collins), but it was only really the "Old Medley" on this that sought me to dig out all the old albums. I spent at least the next decade and a bit moaning that Genesis lost it after Hackett left, but I then remembered that the "Duke" suite is great, and the 80s albums are actually good, and just suffer from being over-familiar. So nowadays I like bits of all Genesis, broadly construed, and it means I can tackle something like Selling England by the Pound to GA without overloading it with an excessive fan's POV that some of these sorts of articles suffer from. Anyway, I'll chip away at Duke a bit more; I've got stuck trying to source the last few bits of Trick of the Tail.
GAs are not too difficult once you've done a bit of work on here, as long as you understand the core policies of WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR, the entire article complies to it (which usually, but not necessarily, implies everything gets sourced to an inline cite) and if you can write a succinct reply on a talk page that doesn't get misunderstood, then your prose skills are probably up to the task. Even then, prose is easy to fix in a GA review, structure, POV and sourcing issues aren't! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)#[reply]
@Ritchie333: The 1992 "Old Medley" has actually grown on me since the first time I heard it. They could never make the "Stagnation" excerpt long enough in my opinion. That moment from When in Rome 2007 with everyone's hands up in the air cheering along is too magical of a moment. Anyway, I appreciate the tips and useful information; your work is a great template to follow for one's improvement. Keep up the excellent work, sir. Let me know if you need any opinions, second thought, or have a need to give out ale recommendations. I am a fan of Doom Bar myself! LowSelfEstidle (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@LowSelfEstidle: I seem to recall sitting down and trying to learn the piano intro to "Firth of Fifth" in summer 1993 ... and nearly 22 years later, I still can't do it. I can do the middle section reprise of it on one hand. Maybe I will crack it before I die - who knows? Anyway, back to articles here, I have done some clean-up on A Trick of the Tail, including another copyedit of most of the prose and removing most of the remaining unsourced material (which was mainly minor technical things). I think the release dates are the only things left uncited, then it'll be good to go for a GA review, although I would like to write a bit more about the cover art, that no sources seem to ever talk about. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: Keep going at "Firth of Fifth", I say. You might just get it. Or even better, the introduction to "Watcher of the Skies"! My best suggestion would be to look at the 2007 reissue interviews on DVD as they tend to talk about the covers on them (certainly for the early Gabriel albums, I'm just unsure if they talk about them for the later ones). The interviews uploaded on YouTube have been cut to fit the 10-15-minute time limits from back in the day, so most are incomplete. LowSelfEstidle (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Yes, 40 years ago, dressing up as a flower seemed like a good idea, but I bet you did silly things too. Don't remind others of past misdeeds."
I used to be able to do the Watcher intro all the way through (and I used to have a VST plugin on a laptop called "Watcher Mix"), and I have occasionally played it at soundchecks. Most people haven't a clue what it is. I've also occasionally run off the main riff to Van der Graaf Generator's "Killer" - actually armed with a set of bass pedals, VDGG's stuff seems easier to play than Genesis', probably because there are less solos. Anyway, Trick is now at GAN. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wisdom Jobs ‎

Hi Ritchie333,

I have just started to editing wikipedia and create two articles Punya Prasun Bajpai and Ashish Kasyap. I was also trying to create page of Draft:Lip Ink International. My intention was only to get to know that why this page is not approving when i have added lots of references. I was doing that just because to learn but not to earn. I have also submitted a page for Wisdom Jobs and added best reliable resources however it was rejected.I asked to the writer that why this page has been rejected when i am have added best notable references but there was no reply from the editor. See the page Naukri.com. This page is referred by poor notable websites however this article is approved. I am only curious to know about how WikiPedia works and nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhyud (talk • contribs) 15:18, 13 April 2015‎

Corporation articles are a hard sell on Wikipedia. The fundamental problem is that too many people are trying to use the site to promote a business, and paid editors are particularly good at trying to hide company articles under a wide range of sources, hoping nobody will spot that they are promotional. To counteract that, we have very strict guidelines for organisations, which means the company must be written about numerous times in major newspapers, magazines or books - no exceptions. In the case of Naukri.com, the article is in a poor shape, but a news search easily shows it is one of the most important websites in India and could be improved. Whereas we reject articles that do not appear to be possible to be improved.
I'm sorry if it feels difficult because paid editors and spammers have ruined things for honest editors who just want to contribute, and it is a shame. However, if the anonymous whistle-blowing feedback I posted on Draft:Lip Ink International is typical of the company, I think they would be better off without a Wikipedia article - it's not always a good thing to have one. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ritchie333 for clearing my doubts. I have noted down your suggestions and will take care in future. I would request you to please delete Lip Ink International as this article doesn't fulfill the criteria of Wikipedia. I would also request you to please take a look of this article Draft:Wisdom Jobs. This company is really doing good in it's industry and also they have good media coverage.[1][2][3]I have added good reliable third party resources to justify my article. I appreciate Wikipedia editors who do hard work to maintain the quality. I can assure you that my all articles will be written with honesty and dignity and will maintain the quality guidelines of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhyud (talk • contribs)
It looks like Timtrent has reviewed that submission and given you a comprehensive opinion of the sources there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ritch333, my all third party resources are being considered as press releases. Can you please share any reference article that can be considered in Wikipedia for my new article. Help me!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhyud (talk • contribs) 13:21, 14 April 2015‎
The best thing you can do is on the red "Submission declined box" is click on one of the "news", "newspapers" or "books" links and see if there's anything there. There's quite a bit about Wisdom Jobs, such as this news source, which I think is reliable and independent, but it's not what I would consider significant coverage. You need something like that, but talking more about the company in an impartial manner. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ritchie333 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhyud (talk • contribs)

References

  1. ^ http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-09-29/news/54437321_1_rs-60-lakh-business-venture-infotech-enterprise
  2. ^ http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/wisdomjobs-to-raise-6-5-million-to-fuel-growth-plans-115011300830_1.html
  3. ^ http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/smartbuy/tech-news/wisdomjobscom-to-dilute-25-to-raise-40-crore/article6652241.ece

Your GA nomination of A Trick of the Tail

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Trick of the Tail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 08:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Trick of the Tail

The article A Trick of the Tail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Trick of the Tail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden Schilling

Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherine.Holt (talk • contribs) 15:08, 16 April 2015

@Katherine.Holt: Not a problem - a professor with a named appointment in a notable academic institution usually meets our guidelines for academics. Normally I'd tell you to read the plain and simple conflict of interest guide but in this instance you have been around for a while and declared up-front that you are a subordinate of Prof. Schilling, so I'll assume you're familiar with the guidelines in this area anyway. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boat Race barnstar o'clock

The Running Man Barnstar
Hey Ritchie, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the many, many reviews of Boat Race articles you've conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Nice legs, shame about the boat race"
"If I am elected, I will make bloody sure that the country will be run from Llwynypia, see if I don't!"
"every Boat Race"? ....and the rest. lol Martinevans123 (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (p.s. ... and Leanne the most gorgeous of the prospective leaders, I think you'll have to agree?)[reply]
Oh, she is smoking hot, especially when she's having a right go at El Fuhrer on telly! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tonypandy Burning, boyo. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Order! Order!" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Mine's a pint of bitter (and twisted), thanks." Martinevans123 (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]
In all seriousness, my next mini-task is to see what I can do with the 70 women's boat race articles, but I doubt I'll even be enthusiastic enough to get to the Welsh variation.... Although I have to admit, I've never seen Ms Wood looking so good. There must a song in that somewhere.... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TRM, I'd give up trying to be serious when Martin's stalking my talk page, you'll just end up banging your head against a wall ... I have seen the last few Boat Race articles on WP:GAN recently, and thought I would have a go at one, but I keep getting distracted by people reviewing mine. Anyway if I see one of the women's race articles there, I'll grab it if the timing's right. I've only got Pawn Hearts left in the GA queue at the moment, so I need to get writing - album articles are easy enough to get to GA with the right book sources, but it's always good to have something a little more challenging. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: You're more than welcome; I took a break in February from GA reviewing generally as I wasn't writing enough of my own, but I'm glad that I made a significant dent in an area of Wikipedia we can really be proud of. And of course, we couldn't have got there without you doing the substantial amount of research, sourcing, and writing in the first place. Right now, I seem to have acquired the de facto title of President of the Heymann Club, who improves articles sat at AfD just to irritate people. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

hi this is dfrr I know I should not be sending you this message but I think you should decide on thisDfrr (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-)[reply]

As long as the topic stays on article improvement, all are welcome on this talk page. (Apart from block notice templates. And excessive easter egg links from Martinevans123. Actually, the second of those isn't too bad on second thoughts.) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:56, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I'd like to invite everyone to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is dfrr. the reason I sent this out is because this has to do with building an encyclopedia. this project has a lot of R&B articles that need improvement.i do not know if you are into soul or not but I am not trying to be funny I am trying to be serious here and improve these articles. I made a edit to James Brown and other articles. so that is why I sent this message. no worries you're okay. thank you and have a great dayDfrr (talk) 20:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-))[reply]

@Dfrr: - No this message is okay - I was more concerned about the plethora of barnstars on Dr. Blofeld's page, amongst other things. Stick to articles, and you'll be alright. I seem to recall James Brown was in a bit of a state; it could do with cleaning up and taking to GA but I'd need the right book sources and some serious background knowledge beyond what I currently have. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rich (if I may call you that) I am sorry about that anyways 2 things. 1.I was trying to award Dr. Blofeld for his good work but I will stop doing that if Mr. Feld does not like it. 2. are you going to be a member of Wikiproject R&B And soul music? because I am already a member and I am on the list here is a link to the list

anyways thank you and have a great dayDfrr (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-))[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Pink Floyd band members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Joyce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

about the message you left on my talk page

hi this is the one and only Dfrr who is known for making the article Lori Beth Allen for Happy Days. I replyed to your message that you left on my talk page and I need you to view it just that. although you can leave a message if you like:-)Dfrr (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-)[reply]

Concerns

I share the same concerns regarding Dfrr. He has made over 390 user talk edits and has already been bought up for his conduct. I don't know if I should bring the matter to ANI but it does seem like he has spamned several users... TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 06:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is far from the first time I've seen this and the usual long-term outcome is a WP:COMPETENCE and WP:NOTHERE related block on ANI, but that takes a long time to get to and there is plenty of time to stop it. Hopefully, the heads up will be taken accordingly and that'll be the end of it - we'll see. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi guys you don't have to worry about me from now on I will only be contacting people about improving articles.Dfrr (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)(Talk to me:-)).[reply]

DYK for Ruth Guler

Harrias talk 13:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for In the Land of Grey and Pink

Pink sky at night, Shepherd's Delight
Sheep drowned in the morning, Global Warming
A golf girl for you!

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See comment at the same header on Martin --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ever seen anyone file an RfA saying they'd like to use the tools to unblock people? Would be a refreshing change, I'd have thought. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Would be refreshing. How would you, aspiring admin, perform the requested close on Beethoven? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
D -> E7 -> A (pause) ... as seen here, of course! But to give a more productive answer, have a read of this, specifically this bit (paraphrased slightly), "Admins always refused to resolve conflicts ... an editor would get into an argument with a reviewer ... they would argue back and forth, discussing the issues ... they would stomp into some admin's talk page hoping for a resolution .... Who's the person who knows least about the problem? Obviously it's the admin - who was just hauled in at the last minute for Conflict Resolution". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the admin had been there before the last minute, he would not be independent, right? - This is an easy case, I think. Just ignore every comment that is not to that article but general (something arbcom requested all participants to avoid): what is left? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ps: as an aspiring admin, you noticed of course that there was a close attempt before which was not accepted ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page refactoring

This edit was an inappriate [[WP:TPO|removal of other editors' comments from a talk page. Musicpublisheronline (talk · contribs) and I had been having a dialog about his username and his editing choices. Certainly you are free to add the simpler version, but WP:TLDR did not apply as MPO had clearly read my comments and responded to them. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it looked like a canned templated warning - I didn't pick up on it being a conversation because the newbie didn't sign. I just noticed it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a simple thank you!!

Hello thank you for saving my page that i started foxholes I appreciate to what you did. For one thing I thought it wa a goner again!!! Well Thnaks again!! Wkc19 (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)wkc19 :)[reply]

DYK nomination of Johann Baptist Wendling

Hello! Your submission of Johann Baptist Wendling at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The Special Barnstar
For your fine work in improving the article Rose and Rosie. And Adoil Descended (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have a look for more sources and see if I can improve the article further as the Huff Post and Metro sources are of the low end tabloid variety. For some reason @Drmies: pops into my head when I think of gay weddings so they might be interested in it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Snake Pass

Allen3 talk 12:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Goat

Hi Ritchie333, Just wanted to pop by to say thanks for finding the sources for the article as well as expanding it - Believe it or not I actually wanted it kept but then again perhaps I should've searched for a bit more than just "Mountain Goat" ,
Anyway thanks for your help - As always very much appreciated :),
Thanks & Happy Editing, –Davey2010Talk 14:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As long as you go into AfD with a mindset of "I can't find any way of improving this article to our required standards - can anyone else?" then you'll be fine. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your help and the suggested links! Phyllis Rosser (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ritchie333&oldid=660075913"