Jump to content

User talk:Winged Blades of Godric

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Likerzz (talk | contribs) at 14:17, 21 March 2017 (→‎Anil Baluni: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #122




Main Page
Please sign your message.


A belated welcome!(albeit by myself!)

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ARUNEEK. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 09:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ARUNEEK , what's your age ? Rajkabir234 (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:38:47, 18 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Elephunk Ears


My article keeps getting rejected because the sources are not reliable. I am using a source which was used by an article that was accepted. How do I know what a reliable source is?Elephunk Ears (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elephunk Ears (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In your case reliable sources would mean reputed books on US Military history, other fact-based accounts of that time, any news published in a reputable newspaper covering the squadron, their exploits etc.Further you need to use inline citation i.e. specify the source for a particular paragraph or a sentence at the end of the sentence or paragraph rather give a bunch of source's name at the end.Please go through the WP:RS policy for a comprehensive coverage.Winged Blades Godric 05:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's interesting. I've been looking at this current article which shows some footnoting but only one reference, which is a website that I also use as a reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2078th_Air_Weather_Reconnaissance_Squadron#cite_ref-2078AWRS_1-0 So in what way are my sources unreliable? I have a book published by the United States Air Force on the history of the Air Weather Service, a book from a 7 volume set on the Army Air Forces in World War II published by the University of Chicago Press, and a website that has already been accepted as a source by Wikipedia. I can understand if the criticism was that what I wrote was unsupported by the sources, but I'm skeptical that the editors who responded to my application, yourself included, had taken the time to read through the sources to draw that conclusion. Also, you are wrong that I just kept submitting the draft without trying to address its deficiencies. Please look at my editing history before making that criticism. Elephunk Ears (talk) 07:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:47:09, 20 January 2017 review of submission by Asya Kush


Hello, thank you for reviewing my submission. Following on that I would like to ask you two questions, if possible. On the references and notability side - did it matter for you that references cited were in Turkish and not in English and that is why you could not follow? Second of all, I would be very grateful if you could say how to improve the manner of writing. I was actually trying to follow the accepted in such short bio articles format. But would be very happy to make all the necessary editorials. Thank you very much for you reply in advance.

Yeah, the references being in Turkish(or for that matter in any lang. other than English) is a definite dis-advantage to any article creator using the same.Even, if I assume that the references establish notability, there are many other problems too! First of all, the draft contains WP:EXTLINK in the body which is not allowed.Further, sentences like -Born in .... are more resume-like and should instead be written as - He was born in.....(Applicable to most sentences of the draft.).Also sentences like---he is currently developing good academic.... , he teaches classical...for 18 years all suits to the writing of a resume. Anyway, I will be shortly pruning/revising the draft (just some general toning...). Winged Blades Godric 09:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, going by the looks of the Turkish websites,I suspect them to be something like blogs etc.Also that an artist is listed in Metallica archive do not confer notability upon the musician. Winged Blades Godric 09:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12:29:15, 1 February 2017 review of submission by 60.52.20.209



Before making further changes to the draft, I would be grateful if you could provide us with guidance on references are not considered reliable please. We have attempted to be very careful in regard to all references and links.

Thank you

Genderaquafish

--Genderaquafish (talk) 05:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)== 00:06:29, 2 February 2017 review of submission by Genderaquafish ==[reply]


Going to resubmit my article for Prime Ministers, have a few questions

Hi Godrik, First, thank you so much for taking the time to review our draft page! I am hoping to get the errors on the draft page for our Prime Ministers page corrected, re-submitted, and approved in the next 24 hours. I was hoping that my having creating an updated English language version of the existing approved Spanish language wiki page would be sufficient, but apparently it is not. Hoping for specific instructions of issues i can correct that will make this page pass review, as i must admit, "does not fulfill criteria for notability" sounds a bit vague to me. Please excuse me, i am new to Wikipedia article submissions, and to be honest I find reading through a 5-paragraph document on Notability Criterion to be less than clear. Thank you for the helpful specific constructive criticism to remove the section on External Links, I am happy to comply.

I have listed the various national awards, chart placements, and online articles by the Prime Ministers, they have been asked to appear at many prominent national and international music festivals, i do not understand how their notability is still in question. Can you please show me an other international band wiki page that is a good example of a fulfilling the criterion of notability, so that I can see the types of references I am missing?

Thanks for your help, Ben GROOVEGURUS — Preceding unsigned comment added by GROOVEGURUS (talk • contribs) 18:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Winged Blades of Godric

Thank you for your review of the draft Wikipedia page M.C. Nandeesha. I would like to request a re-review, after I have addressed your concerns and made the necessary changes. Your guidance would be very useful in helping us make the revisions. Specifically, would you be able to provide more specific information on the following, with respect to the draft:

"Please improve the submission's referencing..., so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia."

Would you give me an example in the draft of where you consider the referencing is not adequate (and why), and also an example of where you think additional or different referencing would improve the article? I will then work to satisfy the Wikipedia requirements.

Thank you!

cheers

Genderaquafish

Reviewed cum replied in the draft.Will be posting a more detailed reply soon.Winged Blades Godric 16:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06:27:43, 3 February 2017 review of submission by Genderaquafish



Dear Winged Blades of Godric

Thank you for your additional guidance on establishing the notability of M.C. Nandeesha. I am working on improving the referencing and will be able to re-submit in a few days for review.

--Genderaquafish (talk) 06:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:55:51, 4 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Poojnm1985



Poojnm1985 (talk) 05:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Poojnm1985:--In general secondary schools are notable provided they exist but in the complete absence of non-trivial discussion of the subject in external sources, I would prefer a heavily trimmed up version.Please remove the Founder and Director sections and instead just put the names in an infobox.Also sentences like --It has now over 1000 happy children enrolled-- is considered weasel in nature and epithets like happy cannot be used in Wikipedia's voice and that also in the lead.Further, the last section-Our Student Council is also unnecessary.Lastly, lines like with the aim is to address the overall development of your child is typical attempts at promotion and remove all such instances of promotion from the draft.Winged Blades Godric 04:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Article of Faia Younan

Hi Dear,

Thank you for reviewing my Draft article about Faia Younan.

My Draft was declined because of an already existing article about Faia Younan. The article was submitted before the other article was created, unfortunately, it wasn't reviewed fast enough.

Nevertheless, my draft have previously been rejected for multiple reasons such as: - Lack of references - citations - and used materials from the official website.

I corrected my article to meet all the requirements, which the current Faia Younan article lack (I'm not sure why mine got rejected while his didn't). Anyway, I am trying to correct some of the information in that article, based on reliable sources, and adding the references, however, the creator keeps reverting my changes. someone should resolve this.

Thank you

TestCandidate 14:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TestCandidate (talk • contribs)

@TestCandidate:--While,I understand the pangs of seeing so many days of hard work coming to a null, I would like that you assume WP:AGF at علاء directly creating the article in mainspace and instead contribute constructively in editing at Faia Younan.But please do not tendentiously edit war to include your version of the article and instead approach each other for consensus in talk-page discussions.As to the draft, it is best to leave it as it is.Winged Blades Godric 15:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Winged Blades of Godric: Thank you for your reply. I'll act as per your advice and talk to علاء.

Akiko Naka Wiki Page

Hi thanks for your review of the page I have posted. Have made some edits to the citations. Please advise me on any specific issue you might have found on the submission. I understand that you are concerned with regard to 'notability'. My references cited are all renowned news sites- Bloomberg/ Channel News Asia etc. Do you have any suggestion on how I can resolve this 'notability' issue? Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Walnutheart (talk • contribs) 15:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will be replying tomorrow.Winged Blades Godric 17:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Walnutheart:--Concerns like Bloomberg, TechAsia etc. cover CEO-s of thousands of startups.Whilst they lend to notability, I would prefer to see more reliable sources in the article used as sourches to vouch for her notability.Err....sorry for the late reply.Winged Blades Godric 05:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miles Doleac opinion

Hello, you just reviewed my article on Doleac. I, in no way, dispute your findings on notability or begrudge your decision. As you can see from my writing style I take wikipedia editing very seriously. I am more interested on your opinion on NPOV of the article. Was I able to sufficiently excise my POV and distance my self from the subject in light of my COI. Kindly, — አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Janweh64:---As regards to NPOV and COI issues, I don't have any problem w.r.t to the tone of the article.But, as I said the problem was that the references in the draft did not prove/ lend any substantial notability to the subject.Winged Blades Godric 09:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16:54:17, 6 February 2017 review of submission by Janweh64

I have added 23 new citations almost doubling the number of sources. References of particular note are: The Los Angeles Times, Signature Magazine, and Dime Magazine which discuss Doleac in length. Also of note are cites 25 a thru e and 46 a thru h which are critics reviews from news organizations like SF Weekly, The Hollywood Reporter, The New York Times, The Village Voice, two from Los Angeles Times, Starburst Magazine, and Film Journal International. I should point out I have a COI declared in the articles talk page, my user page, and discussed with User:Winged Blades of Godric on his talk page. — አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: Hi, can I just get a quick: "I will get to it." I have tried pinging you before. I know we can all get busy sometimes.—አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 01:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Janweh64:-- Sorry, I can't make up my mind on your submission and I will leave it to the discretion of any other reviewer.Winged Blades Godric 05:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking a look. —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 06:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:00:33, 6 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Upstate Elite


Hello, I wanted to reach out regarding the information I attempted to add to the Bill Gray's Regional Iceplex.  All the information I have added to the page (minus the horrendous job I did siting) are accurate as well as relevant.  I am not only a member of the Regional Iceplex, I am also a participant in the Iceplex Adult Hockey League.  Please let me know what I can do to improve the information I attempted to provide.  I look forward to your constructive criticism!


Upstate Elite (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Upstate Elite:--Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia.I declined your AFC because it was not supported by WP: reliable sources and failed to prove it's WP: NOTABILITY criterion.Whilst it may be true that the information added by you are relevant and correct, we rely on reliable sources to buckle the claims.And further, we depend on significant non-trivial discussions in independent reliable sources for putting forward the encyclopaedic notability of the subject.Winged Blades Godric 05:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05:10:37, 7 February 2017 review of submission by Genderaquafish



Dear Winged Blades of Godric

Thank you for your quick response to the re-submitted draft on M.C. Nandeesha. You do not provide any additional guidance on why you consider the notability criteria and referencing criteria are not satisfied in this case. I would like to make the following points, based on the Wikipedia notability criteria, and then request your feedback on where the draft is still deficient.

Notability criteria for people - with my responses: Any biography "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times." - M.C. Nandeesha (MCN) has received several awards of the standing of other persons with Wikipedia pages, most especially the Cambodian Sahameitrei Knight Award given by Hun Sen, the Fellows Award by the World Aquaculture Society, and the Gold Award by the Asian Fisheries Society.

"The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." - MCN made not one but several widely recognized contributions of enduring historical record. The field of aquaculture development is not one that attracts historians due to its relatively recent growth in importance. However, the equivalent of historically verified references come from the "In Memorium" testimonials from some of the giants of aquaculture, both on the World Aquaculture Society website and the Genderaquafish website of the Asian Fisheries Society. His contributions were to (1) boost the aquaculture production of species of carp (fish) that are significant at a global level, (2) increase the number of poor people, including women, in aquaculture production, and (3) educate new aquaculture experts and create professional societies to strengthen the overall capacity of experts in the sector. - These contributions are recognized by the citation rates of his key papers, the respect given by his peers in their on-the-record statements when he died, and that international bodies such as the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Bank, the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, etc used his expertise and his research products/results in their work at a global level.

• The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication. - MCN does not have this.

Academics..... •Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources.- MCN spent most of his career as an academic and as a technical expert carrying out work that was published and presented widely, leaving a strong track of his achievements. Many of his published works were subject to peer review as references. The awards he received from heads of government in Cambodia and his seniors and peers in his profession are further proof that his ideas were very highly regarded. - In aquaculture, few deceased experts have received such high accolades and so many of them from such senior people. These accolades are mentioned in the Wikipedia draft.

I would appreciate your help please.

Genderaquafish--Genderaquafish (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@Genderaquafish:Well, I have my reservations on accepting epithets and praises showered in obituaries as an indicator of one's academic prowess or brilliance in field. And as I have said publishing several research papers (which serve as most of the references) do not confer automatic notability.(I will be taking a look at the citation rates soon!).As to your last point, if that's the case, we are undone.Winged Blades Godric 05:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06:22:24, 7 February 2017 review of submission by Genderaquafish



Regarding aquaculture, Wikipedia is not strong in covering the field from almost any angle - no doubt we could speculate on push and pull factors on this, but it certainly makes it difficult to try to get an article accepted. As examples of the thin coverage: - India does not have its own page on aquaculture, despite being the world's 2nd largest aquaculture producer (if aquatic plants are not included, 3rd largest if plants are included -ref: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf); - none of the professional societies have their own pages; - the information on species and farming systems is poor almost universally; and - I can't find a suitable model profile of a "notable" aquaculture expert.

On the last point, I searched Wikipedia for references to one of the most notable global aquaculture experts ever. The only use of his name on Wikipedia was on a page about a tree, on which he is referenced as a co-author of an aquaculture reference. The seeds of the tree can be made into a cake that is sometimes used to fertilise fish ponds.

Since becoming familiar with the rather slim coverage of aquaculture on Wikipedia (and fish and fisheries more generally), I suggest that now is a very good time for Wikipedia to put its toe into the water and include much more on notable aquaculture topics, themes, people and organisations. Aquaculture is the fastest growing food producing sector on the planet and Wikipedia should enhance its role as a source of reliable information on it.

--Genderaquafish (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09:04:12, 7 February 2017 review of submission by BartJong


I am not requiring a re-review at this moment.

I have two questions, however:

1) What are reliable sources, if not peer-reviewed scientific papers? 2) Yesterday I found a message from Wikipedia in my email box with the subject "The page ‪Draft:Bracmat (programming language)‬ has been reviewed." I did not understand why I should get that email, because I had not submitted the article. Following the "view" link in the email I saw there was a new notice, again saying "The page ‪Draft:Bracmat (programming language)‬ has been reviewed." There was no more text than that short message, but to the left of the message I saw an icon depicting a text and a tick mark on top of it, which I interpreted as telling me that the article had been found acceptable. Then I decided to submit the article. Now the article is declined. My question is: why does Wikipedia send me a mail that seems to tell me that the article is OK?

I am of course unhappy about the box at the top of the draft article telling that the article has been declined. If I had not received the email from Wikipedia telling me that the article had been reviewed, I would not yet have submitted the article. Now I am brought in a situation that depicts me as a person that takes reliability lightly.

What do you propose me to do now?

I do not see a "Save page" button below, so now I am going to press the "Save changes" button below instead. I hope the message is not lost.

With kind regards Bart Jongejan


@BartJong:--I assume you are the developer of the programming language.Whilst it may be painful to see one's own programming lang. not main-spaced, please don't get disheartened.We need a significant discussion of the programming language and other allied aspects in secondary sources which shall not be so uncommon if the language is certainly notable.Please use those as references instead of depending only on research papers.Also, it would be helpful if you take a glance through WP:COI and accordingly disclose your conflicts(if any.)
As to your 2nd query, ask the question at WP:HELPDESK instead.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 13:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11:37:26, 7 February 2017 review of submission by Ntrikha


Hi I have added a reference from the book of Ganda Singh along with the main reference of research book of Sh Khushwant Singh, Are two books sufficient to say that the sources are reliable and the topic is well covered? Martyrdom of Baba Deep singh has been covered in Wiki article related to the person, however, there is no ceoverage of the actual battle where Baba received martyrdom and why is it important. This battle also changed the course of growth of Afghans in India. This battle (Gohalwar and Hoshiarpur) was initial victory of Sikhs against Afghans. It happened much before the King Ranjit Singh could establish his Sikh empire, and lies in the intervening period between death of last Sikh guru and First Sikh empire. Though I am trying to find some reliable book sources for the same, I just wished to enquire if two sources are sufficient?

Request on 11:54:16, 7 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Joanna.najdek


Hello Winged Blades of Godric. To begin with, I would like to thank you for the time you spent on reading my article and giving me a review. I would appreciate it if you could tell me what can I do to improve my article once again. Before I submitted my article for the second time I had been assisted by one of the Wikipedia's Editor on chat. I changed everything according to this Editor's advice. Would you be so kind and tell me what you do not like about my article? How can I correct it? I would be most obliged if you could help me please. I feel a bit lost now. Looking forward to hearing from you.  Best regards, Joanna.


Joanna.najdek (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Joanna.najdek:-By flowery attempts at promotion I mean language like thanks to the power of, According to techtudo.com - top brasilian online tech-magazine spread through the length of the article in Wikipedia's voice.Also most of the reviews mentioned in the awards and reviews sections seems to be not reliable enough.(Barring two/three of the references most are simple software repositories/unreliable blogs etc.)And please don't reference-bomb the article.Sourcing system requirements of the software to 4 websites/sources is pretty over-the-top.Also, the excessive details of the functionality section could easily be done away with--all specifications of the software need not be mentioned in an encyclopaedic entry.Under the purview of reliable sources I mean PC World, PC Central etc. type of websites.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 13:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hello Winged Blades of Godric. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 17,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS. The text is in fact Cyrillic Greeking (a form of Lorem ipsum) and the reference is made up by copy/pasting text into a citation template. Someone with decent fluency in Cyrillic based languages would likely be able to tell this is obvious nonsense and tag it as such with an explanation on the talk page. (From Jbhunley ’’Identifying nonsense at NPP’’). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung:--Oh! I got it.Anyways,hope I keep up to your faith.Thanks!Winged Blades Godric 14:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Winged Blades of Godric,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list

Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=763782465 this list]. -->


Ajay DAta

Please help me correct this content on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ajay_Data. I think there are lots of third party references added and notable. What more is required please guide me and tell me specifically, so I can do the needful. Taruntaunk1970 (talk) 03:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look into the Draft again, I have tried to do major edit as recommended in wiki policies.. Requesting to pl remove the Delete warning.. and help me to edit appropriately. Taruntaunk1970 (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again requesting with kind followup to look at my request. Taruntaunk1970 (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, My I request you to please look into and guide. Taruntaunk1970 (talk) 16:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Digital transformation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Digital transformation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07:16:33, 8 February 2017 review of submission by BartJong


Can you please delete my rejected article about Bracmat completely? Or tell me how I can do it myself?

@BartJong:-- Done--It was nominated for speedy deletion per the correct criterion.Winged Blades Godric 07:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion

I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Tomoaki sato because the article did not seem so overly promotional as to require a fundamental rewrite, and it did have reliable sources about the subject in question which is a strong indication of significance and potential notability. Appable (talk | contributions) 18:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also declined your speedy deletion nomination of High Cuisine because the article did not seem overly promotional and was out of scope of A7 (it was about an idea or concept, which isn't covered under A7). Appable (talk | contributions) 18:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I re-speedied it as G5 since it is identical to the creation by Ashishchopra778. Originally I retagged it as G11 as it was very clearly promotional but realized it was an AC creation. Cheers! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:49:26, 9 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Shubhagovil


Shubhagovil (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Hi there, looking for help on my first article which is currently flagged. It is not much different than Google I/O conference page. In fact it is for a industry conference and not a vendor conf like Google I/O...so not sure what is missing to get it approved.[reply]

Check this history from Google I/O ___________ From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Goldenv (talk | contribs) at 00:45, 16 April 2008 (Added Google I/O wiki entry). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision. (diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Google I/O is a developer focused conference sponsored by Google to discuss web applications using Google and open web technologies.

The first conference was scheduled for May 28-29 2008.

External links Google I/O __________________

Shubhagovil (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)shuhbhagovil[reply]


@Shubhagovil:--Sorry, Wikipedia do not accept any article whose notability can't be proved/sourced.While Google I/O is definitely a notable one, I do not think the same could be said about DevNet Conf. too.But, well I can be wrong and to prove it just cite some non-trivial discussion of the conference in third-party reliable sources in the draft.Winged Blades Godric 09:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poojnm1985

Dear, Winged Blades of Godric. Thanks for the review and the precious suggestions and comments. I have made some necessary edits as advised. Could you please take a look at the article, Draft:Samved School (2) and let know, if there are any more corrections required to be made, or is it ok and acceptable.

- Thanks and Reagards poojnm1985

@Poojnm1985:--I glanced through the draft but err... it is still not okay.I will be making some necessary changes once I am online again!Winged Blades Godric 09:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poojnm1985

Dear, Winged Blades of Godric. Thanks for the review of the article, Draft:Samved School (2) . Will wait for you to make the necessary edits. - Thanks and Reagards poojnm1985

Prod

Hi, Godrich. Thanks for tagging Thomas H. Norstein. When you see an article like that, though (contents: "He was a guy", the rest of the history already deleted), it's better to tag it for speedy than PROD. Bishonen | talk 15:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen:--Thanks for your advice.Overlooked the A1 criterion there.Winged Blades Godric 16:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A3

Hi Godric, thanks for your help patrolling new pages. Balla Keita (Professor) was tagged with A3 two minutes after being created. There is generally a 15 minute grace period before A3 or A1 are applied to an article (WP:NPP has more details). Just leaving an FYI for the future. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni:--Thanks! Will be careful from next time onwards.Winged Blades Godric 16:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Clean coal technology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clean coal technology. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User Winged Blades of Godic

Please, can you help me. The "Draft: Harald Specht" was not correct. I'm new here in Wikipedia and I have a question: Who can help me to bring an article design into the main room of wikipedia? I speak only little English, but the greater problem is, I do not know the techniques of System Wikipedia...

I did not understand what I did wrong.

In the Wikipedia-Help-Chat they sad me, that the most recent book of Harald Specht „Das Erbe des Heidentums“ was even in the last days repeatedly ranke bestseller by No. 1 (!!) in the AMAZON-Ranking and I have to write only this. But my English is too bad, to express it. And the Chat-friends had not time to help.

(So see for example the text from 13.2.2017 bei Amazon: Here the link from 13.2.2017: https://www.amazon.de/Das-Erbe-Heidentums-christlichen-Abendlands-ebook/dp/B0124O7ESK/ref=tmm_kin_sw... there you can see: „Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 5.0 von 5 Sternen 21 Kundenrezensionen Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 1 in Kindle-Shop > eBooks > Fachbücher > Geschichtswissenschaft > Vorgeschichte)

Now my question is: Are the bestseller-state and the ranking-place No. 1 notable enough? And is Amazon the additional reliable source for the subject, what you mean when you not supported?

If "yes", I don't know, how can I write it so that article is o.k. for the main article room. Can you help me here? Can you correct the article design for me?

Thanks for your help!

MrNerwjers Mr.Newjers (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I dont think making an appearance at the bestseller's list only oce makes the author notable for a Wikipedia article. Winged Blades Godric 07:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Re: asanas, as discussed on my talk. It's up. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 16:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:45:14, 14 February 2017 review of submission by Kristbaum


Hello, there. This is the first article i've tried to get into wikipedia, so please excuse my noobness. I have added some more References, am I on the right track with this, or should I do something else? Kristbaum (talk) 22:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of sport utility vehicles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of sport utility vehicles. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atlantic306. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lenovo P2, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I unreviewed it as your tags have been removed by the creator, so perhaps you could review it again to see of you want to readd them, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done-Re-reviewed it.Thanks!Winged Blades Godric 03:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2020

The article merely reflects what's going on in the real world - the FEC's website confirms he has filed the paperwork. I agree with the author's removal of your PROD. The campaign may be too soon, the article isn't. Cabayi (talk) 15:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi:--Well, I won't say I'm satisfied but won't be taking that to AFD.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 15:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Levan Maruashvili

See User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Help_me. --NeilN talk to me 16:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find the "Challenge this deletion " button on Google chrome mobile browser, please help.

please help Ratuls21 (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Hsiung Feng III

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hsiung Feng III. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

reply yo request on deletion of article

I want you to inform that my article states my achievement of 3 rd rank in the whole of India AIR 3 and not a small science olympiam so i request not to delete it and give me time for adding more stuff ! Harshsaini800 (talk) 14:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats for achieving AIR 3! But as it goes, it is not a suitable criterion under the purview of WP:NOTABILITY to deserve a stand-alone article.So, the WP:PROD.But I am sure, in future, you will meet our stringent criterion of notability and be featured in a stand-alone article here.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 15:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Winged Blades of Godric,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 804 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

poojnm1985 ==

Dear, Winged Blades of Godric. This is regarding the article, Draft:Samved School (2) . Its been under review, I am waiting for you to make the necessary edits. Could you please take a look at it, and let me know, if there are any major changes needed.

- Thanks and Regards poojnm1985

poojnm1985

09:46:03, 22 February 2017 review of submission by Poojnm1985

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

poojnm1985

Thanks for the edit, Sir Winged Blades of Godric. I have re-submitted the article, Could you Please review and let know if that's fine. -Thanks and Regards Poojnm1985

poojnm1985=

14:46:01, 22 February 2017 review of submission by Paulfranklinherman


FYI ... "Jay B. Starkey Wilderness Park" is not the same entity as "Starkey Wilderness Preserve". "Starkey Wilderness Preserve" is owned and managed by the Southwest Florida Water Management District, and is composed of the Serenova Tract, Jay B. Starkey Wilderness Park, and the Anclote River Ranch Tract. The Jay B. Starkey Wilderness Park is jointly owned by Pasco County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District, and is managed for recreational purposes by Pasco County Parks and Recreation Department. Saying that "Jay B. Starkey Wilderness Park" cannot have a separate Wikipedia page from "Starkey Wilderness Preserve" is like saying that Florida cannot have its own page because there is already an article on the United States. In order for Wikipedia to offer a complete overview of Starkey Wilderness Preserve, there should also be separate - and more detailed - articles on Jay B. Starkey Wilderness Park, the Serenova Tract, and the Anclote River Ranch Tract. As a local resident who has extensive knowledge of the entire preserve, I was going to author those articles ... but it has been such an effort just trying to get this article approved, I'm not sure its worth the effort. pfh 14:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One Source Warning

Hi,

I added more references to Nina Betschart page. Can you review the page once again? Thanks...

Pedeshtrian (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Sirius

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sirius. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02:11:51, 24 February 2017 review of submission by WFink


Could you please re-review this page? It has been significantly edited with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy in mind and provided with verifiable references. Thank you very much for your effort in advance.

You have erred... (Closing RFC on SUVs)

...but non-rudely. I think the SUV RfC should stay open long enough to get some more input, especially from the gearhead and militarista factions. Anmccaff (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anmccaff:--Well, I have strong doubts.Taking into account the scanty participation and the fact that in 25 days no participant voted for the motion, I don't even find it probable that the proposal will gain enough traction all of a sudden, to reverse-gear from the current trend and be accepted from the WP:SNOW trend.And we can't let open a RFC for ad infimum on the hope some people from the factions you mention, will give his/her gracious views on the topic.But, if you still desire a reopening, ping me.Anyway, how do ya think?Winged Blades Godric 17:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think you ought to reread the comments. They are all in favor of separating somehow the purely military and commercial vehicles, which is to say they are all in favor of changing the status quo, which now has them scattered in willy-nilly. The proposal, in fact, has unanimous traction. Anmccaff (talk) 17:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anmccaff:--Sorry,I thought you were supportive of the intermixing!Anyway, in the closing statement, I precisely said what you said in your prev. statement!Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 17:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but you also closed the RfC before the people liable to actually act on it had even seen it, apparently. Anmccaff (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anmccaff:--Well going by the current condition of the RFC, I feel 25/30 is enough.If somebody with a contrary mindset missed the RFC in the 25 days despite it's exhaustive listing at diff. projects, chances are they will miss it in the next 5 too!I failed to get your statement--people liable to actually act on it!Winged Blades Godric 17:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway you can now proceed to cleaning up the article per the established consensus.Winged Blades Godric 17:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TripuraKnowledge (talk) 06:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Sir a very valid page with a lot of references got deleted, please review my opinion below and let me know if I need to revise anything

Sir there is no doubt that the person in the page exist and he is the most famous police men in Tripura, India... I realy admire him. You can verify it by calling any random police station in the state of Tripura and then you can know better about him. You can understand by my word how confident I am. There are many local newspaper articles about this police men's good work, plus the page had got a lot of references. So it should not be deleted. It is not a hoax. It is truly real. Sir please do review the page I had created and undo and let me know if you want any changes in it. Sacrifies and high integrity of work of such soldiers should be noted. Thanks! TripuraKnowledge (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC) (TripuraKnowledge (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

page:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Satyendra_Basu_Roy_Choudhury TripuraKnowledge (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Actually I am running quite low on my phone balance and thus least interested on calling random police stations in a state to enquire about how good one of their officers are! On a serious note please see WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source and what not.And your page was not deleted because it was a hoax.It was because it failed to even get close to our stringent notability guidelines.Winged Blades Godric 07:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16:15:49, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Skire913


I have made substantial changes to my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Acute_Cardiac_Unloading per your suggestions. Whenever possible I have removed primary sources as references and replaced them with review articles, per your instructions. I have also removed any deductive reasoning to make this article read much less like a medical journal article, also per your suggestion. I think you will find the revised language and format much more in line with the expectations of Wikipedia. Thank you.

Has asked Doc James to review it.Check his talk page.Winged Blades Godric 16:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Voting system

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Australia at the 2018 Winter Olympics. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I messed it up in a spate of hurry--needlessly closing an AFD discussion only to reopen it moments later.Why are bots so damn fast?I was just reverting the article back to the last version and then lo--an edit conflict!.Winged Blades Godric 13:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Aquaporin

Hi, I've reviewed Aquaporin at Talk:Aquaporin/GA1. The article needs some small fixes to reach GA; I'm telling you this because you nominated it but the bot seems not to have bothered to tell you about the review. Please let me know how you intend to proceed. With many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well,thanks!But I'm going offline as of now.Will surely make some of the desired changes within the next few days.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 17:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Winged Blades Godric 17:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All done except for the history. I've suggested the sources you can use. You just need a sentence or two on each one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we got through it, well done. You will find future GAs easier if you familiarise yourself with the range of editing techniques required, and check articles thoroughly before submitting. The process can be arduous, and by no means all GA reviewers will bend over backwards to help you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap:----Well,I corrected the copy-vio and extensively edited the structure section and pressed the save button--only to discover an edit conflict.Anyway,a lot of thanks for your help.It's my first GA..Winged Blades Godric 14:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All good practice, I guess! I thought I'd better make sure it was clean. I shall try to remember to check for copyvios before doing anything else, it seems to be becoming more of a risk; but this one does seem to have happened years ago. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah!That's a point.Winged Blades Godric 14:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Sajilo Recharge

Hello Winged Blades of Godric. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sajilo Recharge, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to software. Thank you. SoWhy 16:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

poojnm1985

Sir, Winged Blades of Godric. Could you please review the document Draft:Samved School (2), and let know, if this can be accepted. Or if there are any more changes required to be done. - Regards poojnm1985

Closure of Trump suit

Per your tally for Q-2 on the closure for the Trump suit, I did a tally, noted on Feb. 16th comment, finding 5 for minimal mention and 7 for not mentioning. This is different from your closing comments that the consensus was for a brief, or minimal, mention. Hoping you can review and update. Thanks. --Light show (talk) 06:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Light show:--Hi! It's 8th of March today.Secondly, RFC is hardly a vote count.Now if I tread your way--Vote no-1,3,4,6,7,8,9 & 11 in the support section supported it's inclusion albeit briefly.Vote no-5 & 6 did not opinionate about the issue on hand.Votes-2 & 10 in the same section opposed on the ground that it was retracted and that's the precise reason why I made it mandatory to mention the subsequent retraction.The 2 votes in the oppose section(incl. you) objected clearly.Also, I am near-certain there's no BLP violation per the way so many discussants agreed to and I listed in the closure statement. Summarizing, I do not perceive any error in my closure.Any thoughts?Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 07:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing. By my reading, #s 1, 6, & 11 had no comment on Q-2. As for #s 3, 4, 8, and 9, those are questionable on Q-2. While those 4 comments supported either minimal mention or Melanie's wording, her wording was mostly related to the ethics issues, which were never part of the RfC. And looking at comments #s 1, 3, and 4, you'll see that ethics was their main concern. But the ethics issue, besides being off topic to the RfC, is moot in any case, since they modified the lawsuit. This does seem to be a sensitive BLP issue worth analyzing. Thanks again. --Light show (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Light show:--You're right about Vote 6 .Their answers to this specific question are impossible to decipher.You're wrong about Vote-1 per my opinion.And Melanie wrote--that alleged that she had once worked for an escort service. The Mail retracted the allegation a month later.If you do not view this wording as a minimal support to the question asked in Q-2, I am undone about your views on votes-3,4,8,9.Vote 11 also later supported Melanie's passage.So his answer is fairly understandable.Now, the source you cited--is hardly of any utilisation/concern to me.I never edit in the concerned area and my duty as aRFC closer is to summarize the policy-based consensus and the way-out to be followed based solely on the consensus and discussion developed therein--whatever the heck that be.I am not entitled to show my personal opinion/understanding of the issue there.It may be also noted that the support votes to Q-2, I struck goes to the neutral category!Thanks!Winged Blades Godric 09:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Light show:--Pinging you because I changed a point in my reply.Winged Blades Godric 11:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing. A 3-question RfC like this one made it a bit complicated.--Light show (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Myocardial infarction

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Myocardial infarction you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Topcipher. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Matale Sri Muthumariyamman Temple, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

TopCipher (talk) 08:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Field-programmable gate array

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Field-programmable gate array. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Levinson page

I didn't have time to contest the deletion. Can you explain how this is promotional? Specifically, I wrote it from a neutral point of view. As the rules state, "Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." What wasn't neutral? Willeadie (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Willeadie:--Sorry, I don't remember the contents of your article.Please contact the deleting admin.

I thought the note said you were the deleting admin. I'll check again. Willeadie (talk) 00:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Robert Sungenis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Sungenis. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confused about rejection of SAP Web IDE entry

I am writing an entry for SAP Web IDE software, but has been rejected, with 2 issues:

  • Too many sources from SAP: ALL the SAP press releases and sources have been removed, and all are independent. The list also includes several very prominent, well-known independent sources -- CIO, Forbes, Eclipse, ComputerWeekly, Forrester.
  • Notability: The article states at the beginning very clearly that (independent) analysts see SAP Web IDE as key to moving SAP developers to the cloud. That is, this is part of a strategic initiative of one of the leading software companies in the world with 22 billion euros in sales in 2016 (according to Wikipedia). That sounds pretty notable, no?

In addition, there are many, MANY other articles with very similar content. Take Cloud9 IDE), it is basically the same type of product as SAP Web IDE yet has less strategic importance. In addition, of that article's 10 sources, HALF are from Cloud9.

I truly believe that the article speaks for itself and is not commercial and is notable. Please tell me what else can be edited to make it pass muster.

The nomination for deleting my page Minerva Pendragon

I am the daughter of Janice Evans aka Minerva Pendragon. Everything I wrote was fact and I cannot contest the request to delete the page as I can't find it to click on the contesting button. I had planned to expand alot more about my mother and her book in due course and add pictures of her once I figured out how to add them. I'm just sad that my mothers work seems to have not gotten the glory in history it should do and am missing her terribly as it's my 2nd birthday without her today. Someone needs to put a page up about her and her book, and who better than the person closest to her and the person who actually proofread it and has the rights to it. Electric Dreams (talk) 06:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Electric Dreams:--While I understand your pain and frustration, she(Minerva) does not seem to meet WP:GNG and specifically WP:NAUTHOR, mainly due to a complete dearth of coverage about her in sec. sources.If you manage to find WP:RS discussing about her, please cite them in the article.Thanks!Winged Blades Godric 06:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh I see. My bad. I should be able to find newspaper articles and cite her amazon page, would that be enough to qualify her hun? And thanks for the help by the way :) Electric_Dreams Electric Dreams (talk) 06:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even got her IBN number here somewhere too :) Electric Dreams (talk) 06:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Electric Dreams:--IBN number/Amazon do not qualify as WP:RS.If you have got coverage in prominent non-local newspapers use those as sources.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 06:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


need a help in nomination for deleting 21 (film 2016)

dear Godric, all the cast and crew is new in this film 21 (film 2016). but film is notable in Telugu language. i' l try to improve this article what can i have to do undeletion for this article please help thank you. Goutham raju tfi (talk) 08:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I wish to thank you very much for revewing the article I have created recently. Yours sincerely. Gharouni Talk 08:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was neither

the time nor the place. But now... This is the time and This is the place. Take care 🍨 — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 07:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi:--Yeah, I understood. I was prob. a bit too stunned by the peculiar action of the admin.As always, you did good by removing my comment.Cheers!.Winged Blades Godric 11:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request For Move a Draft to Mainspace

Hello! And Thank You for maintain. Please Move a Page Draft:Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi to Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi

If you will done it then left a message on my talk page. ((World556 (☎) 12:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Request on 04:52:12, 20 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by AtulWikiacnt


Hi, first and foremost, thanks for giving your time to review this page. This page is created for Geetanjali Sharma. She is the youngest citizen of India, who has won these both award together. The one Sangeet Natak Akademi Award which is the highest award in the field of music and arts from Government of India and the second Yash Bharti Award which is the highest award from her state, Uttar Pradesh. References 1 and 4 in the list are the reliable sources for these awards respectively. Wikipedia can have an entry for this unique personality from India. Thanks.


AtulWikiacnt (talk) 04:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AtulWikiacnt:-
  • Ref-2, 5 & 6 fails the scrutiny of WP:RS.
  • All the rem. sources just mentioned the subject in a list of all the people who received the award and there's not a slight speck of any discussion specially about her/her work etc in any of them.
So, I fail to see any notability/uniqueness of the subject.And a Sangeet Natak Akademi Award/Yash Bharti Award automatically does not confer notability on it's subject to have a stand-alone article specifically when the number of recipients of the award is so huge.We need more WP:RS covering exclusively her and her art/work.Winged Blades Godric 06:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Winged Blades of Godric:-

Thanks for your quick reply. I very much agreed with you that the number of recipients of Sangeet Natak Akademi Award/Yash Bharti Award is so huge. But the number of recipients who have won these both award are very few. When I found this uniqueness then only I thought of creating a page for the artist. We do have some references of leading Hindi News papers. will those references work ? Thanks.

AtulWikiacnt (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:35:10, 20 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Dixon324


Hello! My submission was rejected due to unreliable or insufficient sources, and I'm not sure why. I'd like to know if this is applicable to every source, or just some in particular? Can you please help me? Thank you!


Dixon324 (talk) 05:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dixon324:--
  • Well Reference-1 and Ref-2 do not cover the subject.There's no inherited notability.
  • I'm skeptical about Ref-3 and Ref-6 !
  • Ref-5,7 & 8 fails the scrutiny of WP:RS and two of them even don't cover the subject.
Overall nothing points to notability and discussions about the subject(not his grandfather) in reputable media outlets, books etc. will be welcome.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 06:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05:37:45, 20 March 2017 review of submission by Retengineer


I would appreciate more details about what needs to be fixed in this article. I thought I had addressed all the issues identified by earlier reviewers and provided plenty of third party references. Please note this comment from a previous reviewer: Comment: She may very well be notable. I just think the reviewers here have difficulty identifying what notability means in the field of children's literature. This needs wider attention than that offered by the AFC habitués. Hegvald (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Request on 15:18:49, 20 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Adapt16


Hello, can you please provide specific examples of copy that reads like an advertisement? I used the databases provided by Wikipedia to find neutral citations to back up the facts about Reliant Energy. Can you please advise how to best update this page?

Thank you.


Adapt16 (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page you reveiwed

Hello I am user:22mikpau. I notice that you rejected the draft, Draft:William H. Bell (Witness) I understand that you do not view Wiliam Bell as following Wikipedia's nobility guidelines. I do not understand why a African American man who; Opened the door and soon chased after a man related in the Lincoln assassination, identified the captured criminal and was a key witness ageist a white man in the trial that the entire nation was watching. Other witness's of the Seward assassination have Wikipedia articles and we have both first and secondary sources from major historian and news networks. If the problem in in the number of sources please tell me how many you would suggest. Thank You for your input in the creation of this article.22mikpau (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Early Childhoom Trauma

hi there, I've noticed that you've rejected the draft for an article about early childhood trauma. I have to admit that the previous submission was far from perfect, but I used it as a case in point in a Slate op-ed. The current submission looks much better to me and I'm surprised you find it unsuitable even as a sub. Would you be so kind as to give some constructive and useful feedback to the authors? My concern is that they can be naturally frustrated and disappointed with the rejection, and without proper guidance they will likely leave Wikipedia for good, which obviously is highly suboptimal (the article is well grounded). best Pundit|utter 17:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:35:30, 20 March 2017 review of submission by ANIRBANB724


I do understand that the previous detailed sections missed public referable material. I have removed them all and kept it simple to information that has good references. Would appreciate if you can re-review and let me know your thoughts.

Please comment on Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

poojnm1985

Sir, Winged Blades of Godric. I understand you have done the required corrections and edits for the draft Samved School (2), Could you please review the document Draft:Samved School (2). Its been under review Queue for Quite a long duration now.Could You please let know, if this can be accepted. Or if there are any more changes /corrections required to be done. - Regards poojnm1985

poojnm1985

Anil Baluni

Hello, User:Winged Blades of Godric The Wikipedia page Anil Baluni has already a reference of BJP's official website.(LIKE RZZ 14:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Winged_Blades_of_Godric&oldid=771432090"