Jump to content

User talk:Narutolovehinata5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hasperasperagus (talk | contribs) at 11:41, 30 July 2017 (→‎Inverse Warburg Effect: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lanka BBC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanka_BBC Bro Please Help My To Rewrite

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Unfortunately there is nothing I can do about the article. The company does not appear to meet our notability guidelines and thus cannot be included in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:NCORP for more information. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

Thanks Please Help To Full Fill This Article Narutolovehinata5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahi1998 (talkcontribs) 03:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

please help me i crate this article more than 20 times but you are blocking my article why what i do for you

@Rahi1998: Wikipedia has inclusion guidelines for what can and cannot be included in the encyclopedia. One of these guidelines is that the topic of the article must have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources; that is, there are sources (online or offline) by reliable sources (what constitutes a reliable source is determined on a case-by-case basis, but a good rule of thumb is that the source is an authority on the field, and/or said source is also considered reliable by others in the field). Based on what I could find, this BBC Lanka appears not to have been covered by such sources, and in fact, I can find little-to-no evidence that this company is even an actual television station like what is claimed in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just trying to get my page back. It was valid, and meet guidelines. It was up for three years. Please restore it

page was - Emit Artist Emit - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Emitdfatt: What was the URL of the original article? I can't find it in the deletion log. But in any case, you accidentally posted your asking for help as an article, and thus the page has to be deleted. You may instead post your question on the help desk or at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete

I apologize. I am unfamiliar with Wiki and message and requests. My page was deleted by @JgZ... the reason was because the author was blocked or deleted which is irrelevant because my page was thee years old with valid content. Not sure what that user did recently, but that's irrelevant to my page.

Thanks for your help

Emit - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Emitdfatt: I think it would be best for you to contact JzG directly then. Leave them a message on their talk page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed

What does it mean when you review an article? Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Kingfisher: It's a simple check to allow articles, particularly newly-created ones, to be indexed by search engines such as Google. It also serves as a rough check for newpage patrollers to see if a newly-created article meets inclusion guidelines or has been nominated for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This may not necessarily strictly meet the no content CSD criteria. Please feel free to revert my tag and PROD it (or AFD it) if you think that's more appropriate, because I'm not particularly sure about it. I was musing over it when I noticed you'd made the AFD. Cheers, Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thompson.matthew: Let an admin decide what to do with the article. If an admin decides that the article does meet A3 and deletes it then so be it. If an admin declines the speedy nomination then that would be the time for AFD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Myth & Roid

On 18 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myth & Roid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the musical unit Myth & Roid comes from words representing the past and the future? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth & Roid. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Myth & Roid), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yetiforce on Wikipedia

Dear Narutolovehinata5, Thank you for your service in reviewing entries. The company I work with and for myself personally, this is our first time submitting an entry into Wikipedia. So I would kindly ask for your assistance in helping us understand what we need to change so that the appropriate information about our company is included in Wikipedia. My understanding is that there is not coverage about our software is this correct? Also if I understand well, it seems one other observer feels we made a statement that is advertisement. Is this the link to the Yetiforce store, "and paid support, available in the form of support packages sold in the store." I am really trying to learn, so I hope this is not to amateurish to ask these kinds of questions. Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon. Benjaminburg (talk) 22:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My page was removed

I was testing the watchful population on how fast they would take down an addition if it was red or blue.




I also have a hard time taking you serious in a professional manner with a username of that sort. I also looked through your likes and dislikes. I found an astonishing amount of information I would never want revealed if I was the monitor for this well known website. That is enough of my ranting. (I am not against anime, just over sharing of any type of personal information) Robbertcorrick (talk) 06:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response User talk:Benjaminburg

Hello Again, thank you for quick response. I think we handled the change with COI. I hope.

Just so I can learn more. Would you mind explaining in your opinion why companies like SuiteCRM and Epesi pass the notability condition? Can you please explain the difference.

Benjaminburg (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Thank you[reply]

@Benjaminburg: Right now that article is severely lacking in references, but a search proves that in the case of SuiteCRM at least it has been covered by reliable sources such as Opensource.org, Datamation, and Enterprise Apps Today. These hits appear to be independent of the company, meaning these pages were not written to promote or advertise, and were written by third-parties. In the case of your company, coverage by third-parties, let alone reliable ones, is sorely lacking. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, New Binary Press, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE - re-curated it with inline citation tags. DrStrauss talk 20:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Meiloorun. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vaddiparti prabhakar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of D.Gray-man

Hello! Your submission of D.Gray-man at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

scryed ga

Is there another issue with the article's state? A copyeditor made some tweaks yesterday. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for D.Gray-man

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Answer to the: "Speedy deletion nomination of Arcticus System AB[edit source]"

I intend to fix the page according to the Wiki's criteria, however, i was just creating some pointers.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Arcticus System AB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio.bucaioni (talkcontribs)

D.Gray-man

As the original GA reviewer of the article D.Gray-man, do you think it lacks something besides copyediting (I requested the guild some weeks ago) before becoming a FA? I will try to make this article FA. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I would suggest you read the article School Rumble and use that article as a basis for the article. D.Gray-man is a well-written article, but while it's comprehensive at the moment, it's not ready for FA just yet. One suggestion I can give right now is for you to look for sources regarding the anime's production: how was an anime adaptation suggested? Why was one made? How were the characters cast? What went into the production of the anime? In addition, could the "books" and "video games" sections be expanded further, if possible? Lastly, and this is something I learned during the peer reviews for Puella Magi Madoka Magica: a wider variety sources should be used, particularly Japanese ones. While using primarily ANN is acceptable up to GA status, beyond that, relying too much on that source is seen as a flaw. At the moment, around half of the article's references cite ANN; it would probably be a good idea to add non-ANN citations as well to bring that proportion down. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The 9th volume of the manga has info about the making of the first anime. Where should I put it? In anime adaptations? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Production section, possibly in a subsection titled "anime". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Due to finding info for only one paragraph, I guess I shouldn't create a subsection.Tintor2 (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I tried reducing the use of ANN in sales' section. However, ANN is the only site that posts news about the hiatus.Tintor2 (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintor2: If ANN is the only source that's available, then feel free to use it. Just avoid using it all the time, especially if other sources can be used. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Narutolovehinata5,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I nominated the article mentioned for GAN. If you have the time, I would like to ask if you would review it. If you can't, please reply. Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Thank you for the interest but unfortunately I'm currently busy with real-life matters so I cannot do the review at this time. If you wish, you may leave a message at WT:ANIME and ask any of the other users there if they are willing to review the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's alright. Someone already reviewed it. I also wanted to let you know that the main character of the series is nominated for an FA promotion. When you get a chance, could you give feedback? MCMLXXXIX 22:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@1989: Sure. I can take a look at the article right now if you want. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. If you can, could you have a look at this FLC? MCMLXXXIX 10:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecysound_Systems

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it contains only factual information and quotes of interest to researchers of the company, its history and products.Luminous Industries Australia (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

Greetings. I've been following the Did you know guidelines but I couldn't find what to do until reaching the limits of DYK after reaching the maximum. Could you tell me? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: As long as you currently don't have more than five DYK nominations you should be fine. However, once you have exceeded five DYK nominations, for every nomination you make, you must review at least one other DYK nomination: this is called quid pro quo. You can read the guidelines on how to review DYK hooks over at WP:DYK. Although you are still exempt from QPQ at this point, I suggest that you start doing QPQ reviews now so that by the time you are required to do QPQ reviews, it would already be a habit. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I guess I'll try it when nominating Millennium Earl to GA. Sadly, it will take a while due to the time it will take to be copyedited considering not even my first request wasn't copyedited yet. By the way, do you think the article's name is okay or it should be "The Millennium Earl"? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintor2: I haven't watched or read D.Gray-man so I don't know, but as far as I know character names almost never start with "The" so I guess "Millenium Earl" should be the correct article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i think so too

i think its wikipedia Kor... but i had a mistake.. i thought this site is wikipedia KOR..my mistake.. jang8962 (talk · contribs)

Gamar Malamo Airport page reviewing.

Hi there Narutolovehinata5. A very big thank you for reviewing my page Gamar Malamo Airport. FlyJet777 (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Miyu Tomita

On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miyu Tomita, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Japanese voice actress Miyu Tomita was a member of her school's manga research club? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miyu Tomita. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Miyu Tomita), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unreviewed Article – The Montserrat Reporter

Hello. You reviewed a newly created article for me in the past, and I wanted to know if it would be possible for you to review another newly article that I've created. It's The Montserrat Reporter and has been unreviewed for almost a month. Would you happen to know why it has taken so long for the article to be reviewed? Appreciate your help. Oriole7 (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oriole7:  Done. As a favor, could you also review the article Miyu Tomita? I created it more than a week ago and it's even been featured on DYK, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for taking a look at the article. I wish I could, but I am not an admin so I do not know how to review articles. If it's not too much to ask, I created Warren Cassell Jr. yesterday as well. Could you take a look? I'm not sure what's causing the backlog. Oriole7 (talk) 11:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oriole7: You can request for the New Page Reviewer right. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

Apparently I forgot how to make user pages :P Ethanbas (talk) 05:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help! :)

Hi! I'm the creator of the Center for the Integration and Advancement of New Americans page that was recently flagged for deletion. I was wondering if you had any suggestions as to what I could do in order to make my article adhere to Wikipedia's standards? This is my first article, so I'm still trying to figure this out! CIANA (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the article cannot remain on Wikipedia, as it appears that the organization does not meet our notability guidelines (you can read more at WP:NORG). In addition, it appears that you have a conflict of interest, which generally means you should as much as possible refrain from contributing to Wikipedia anything that you may have a connection with. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need a file uploading

Hi, I need the world of sport wrestling logo uploading as I'm not allowed to upload at this point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wraymaster66 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Maon Kurosaki

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maon Kurosaki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Maon Kurosaki

The article Maon Kurosaki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maon Kurosaki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly help me to delete the page

Dear Sir,

   Thanks a lot for noticing my new template - টেমপ্লেট:অসমাধিত. Actually, I made a mistake creating this template , which I should make in bn.wikipedia.org. How can I delete this page?

Thanking you,

Sincerely, P.Shiladitya — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.Shiladitya (talkcontribs) 05:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@P.Shiladitya: You can add the {{db-g7}} template to the page, signifying that, as the page's creator, you request that the page will be deleted. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks a lot sir. P.Shiladitya (talkcontribs)

+ The Guidance Barnstar

The Guidance Barnstar
Thank you for all your gentle guidance and help for this new editor. Shirt58 (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing 公主誕, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Mabalu has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing so that if the speedy delete tag is removed again it won't slip through into the system as a reviewed article.

To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.

Mabalu (talk) 10:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for this, I know it's really annoying to get these automated notices but there seems no way to turn them off, which seems necessary for uncontroversial unreviewings such as this. Mabalu (talk) 10:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Earl GAR

Greetings. If it is possible and you have free time, could you review Millennium Earl? It's a small article that I recently nominated. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've already taken a look at the article, and to make a long story short, it's almost ready. However, the creation and conception section could use more expansion and sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added a bit more. The problem is that some parts of the character weren't discussed due to future developments of the series such as his true identity.Tintor2 (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you can find sources discussing said development, then you can add them to the article. Remember that Wikipedia allows spoilers in plot sections, so there's no reason not to includent. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, Hoshino never said things that talk about the series' future. She only said once that Cross Marian might appear in a flashback.Tintor2 (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maon Kurosaki

On 10 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maon Kurosaki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to her major debut, singer Maon Kurosaki posed as a gravure model for the cover of a novel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maon Kurosaki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maon Kurosaki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Vanjagenije. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2017 Philippine network television schedule, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently expanded the GA Himura Kenshin to make it look like the FAs Allen Walker and Naruto Uzumaki so I made a DYK nomination. Still, I think did too many requests? Could you give me a hand with it? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Machico (singer)

On 18 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Machico (singer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that voice actress and singer Machico made a cameo as herself in the anime television series Seiyu's Life!? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Machico (singer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Machico (singer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

In response to your question, I think that if we don't hear from them in the next 24 hours, we should shut down the nomination and fail it. If I have time to review Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World I will. ISD (talk) 09:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewal pending - Pregnancy in art

Hey, I just recently created a new article and it is pending for reviewal. Please review. The article is Pregnancy in art.King Prithviraj II (talk) 18:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Re:Zero ? Starting Life in Another World you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Re:Zero ? Starting Life in Another World for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Laws of London, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Markus Winter, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cahk (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World

On 5 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original draft for the light novel series Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World was over 1,000 pages and had to be significantly cut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 05:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Fierra Fly Article

(Iamthebestthereis (talk) 14:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)) Hey Naruto san im glad you picked me up off the wikipedia streets lol i was an orphan until i met you...thanks once again but the article i submited meets all 3 wikipedia guidelines veriability neutral point of view and no original research and on top of that the article explains to readers vividly and clearly what the person/topic is and why it is being covered....it complys with and is definitely a credible claim of significance! theres other articles ive overlook with no credible sources or any valid claims of significance and should not even be on wikipedia...yet they are! Help Me Please senpai  :)[reply]

@Iamthebestthereis: Please carefully read WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Iamthebestthereis (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)) ive already looked into that way before i even made the article and Yea what you are saying/did was wrong you got my article deleted when it shouldnt have been marked in the first place..the article i wrote had 3 different third part sources plus references[reply]

oh and yea i want/would like the markup data for my particular article that you marked for deletion 45 seconds after i posted it! so i can make adjustments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamthebestthereis (talkcontribs) 23:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For Your Review

Thank you to reviewed my new article Sweet 20 (2017 film). Really appreciate it


Puchicatos (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For the fast reviewed in new article Puchicatos (talk) 11:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Narutolovehinata5,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 811 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing PSR J1856+0245, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Winged Blades of Godric has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Copy-vio...

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Winged Blades Godric 11:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for reviewing my newly created article so promptly. Regards Yavarai (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madoka Magica

Hello, Naruto!!! I hope you're doing good. So, I saw you guys wanting to nominate Madoka for FA but it seems that the article is kind of incomplete. I was browsing the Japanese magical girl wiki, and it is written that Madoka has become a social phenomenon in Japan. It's even written in this site: http://uchiagehanabi.jp/ "Magical Girl Madoka ☆ Magica" that has become a social phenomenon" So, I think we should include this in Madoka's article, and we should also expand the article. What do you think? You're the main contributor to the article and this is why I'm complaining to you :) I think we should also invite Artichoker to the discussion. Don't forget to ping me when replying!UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I also forgot to ask you this, but can we split and create an article to Rebellion alone? Check its talk page UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto, please, reply. :( UnknownUsername480 (talk) 18:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, I was out of town for two days. I think it would be good to see if there's consensus for such a split. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay. So, I think you're against the split? And what about the 'social phenomenon' thing? I think it should be added to the main article... UnknownUsername480 (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of. We need to see if there's sufficient material and coverage for the Rebellion independent of the franchise to warrant a separate article from the Films article. In addition, if we split Rebellion, we might as well give the other two films their own articles as well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, the first two movies can have an article together and we can title it as Puella Magi Madoka Magica the Movie while Rebellion can have its own article since it's an original story unlike the first two. I think I should create it on my sandbox and then you can decide whether to split or not. What do you think of this idea? UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Tuangru, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Chrissymad has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I have unreviewed Tuangru because it contains copyright violations that need to be addressed.

To reply, leave a comment on Chrissymad's talk page.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks a lot for reviewing my article promptly. Regards Yavarai (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting deletion of my submitted Wiki article

Hello! I recently posted my first Wikipedia article on 'Dr. Khaled Mahdi,' and after its first deletion, I made some fundamental changes and re-posted it, only to find you had marked it for deletion.

I would like to contest the deletion as I have modelled the page's writing, content, and formatting based on established/accepted Wikipedia biographies of a living person such as Ban Ki Moon's and others (and those are still up). The content is not made up but I have utilised extensive sources and bibliographies and complete information, etc., on this important public figure, and I've stuck as closely to that format as possible, so I don't think there's a reason for its removal (unless you'd like to delete those too of course).

If you still think I need to make any changes I'd sincerely appreciate if you could give me more detailed advice on what needs to be done, otherwise I'd be very grateful if you could kindly restore the page.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamia Bahy (talkcontribs) 21:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Herbert H. Harwood, Jr., Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Domdeparis has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Hi I'm sorry but I'm going to have to unreview this page as the author does not meet WP:NAUTHOR. It requires that even if he has created a collective body of work, as is the case here, "such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." and this is not supported by the sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Domdeparis (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just out of curiosity what was your thinking when you reviewed the page without tagging it for improvement ? Domdeparis (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I took a look at the article, and at the very least there was a claim to notability so that was good enough for me. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You've reviewed several of my settlement entries for South Sudan. Thank you so much for you efforts patrolling new pages! Mr leroy playpus (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think I only reviewed one South Sudan-related article, though. But thanks for the barnstar. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrating 9 years of editing

Hey, Narutolovehinata5. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mz7 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent review of Hayao Miyazaki

Recently I noticed that you had assessed the article for Hayao Miyazaki and thought to ask if you might have an interest in another Japanese director Akira Kurosawa. I recently did a nomination for him and was wondering if you might glance at the article to see if you or someone you know among the editors might take and interest in possibly assessing this article for Wikipedia. JohnWickTwo (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: NBA Youngboy

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NBA Youngboy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaborating with notable rapper indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 08:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hayao Miyazaki

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Domestic Girlfriend

Hello sir! I've accidentally moved the Domestic Girlfriend page to List of Domestic Girlfriend chapters, while I'm trying to make a new page for chapter list. But i can't undone it. So can you please fix this problem and create a separate page for chapter list. Phoenix God (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved
It appears this was resolved by yourself. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that these are two separate towns. See https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Bhadra,+Haryana,+India/Badhra,+Haryana,+India/@29.0954723,74.9120364,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x3911341e66889681:0x29f59cf960b2700a!2m2!1d75.0596545!2d29.7451757!1m5!1m1!1s0x3912f03171662795:0xf82f2847c92698c1!2m2!1d75.9376146!2d28.5094117!3e0?hl=en, for example, where Google Maps locates them as being a four-hour drive away from each other. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Seems the two towns are in the same state(?) so confusion does seem possible, though when I initially checked, it seemed that the village referred to in Bhadra(भादड़ा) already had an article here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Sharmalakshya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — fortunavelut luna 15:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing CCA Global Partners, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing to get more eyes on this: created by CU confirmed sock.

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

TonyBallioni (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inverse Warburg Effect

Dear Narutolovehinata5

Thank you for your objective evaluation that the article is not promotional. As regards your comment that the article is 'fringe', I am forwarding a message I also sent to Roger Hayworth. In this message I give three links to scientific evaluations of the theory. One of the links is to the Harvard Gazette, two are to European national newspapers. The latter two reports are in German, however, google translations can immediately be accessed.

"The Inverse Warburg effect, as cited in the Wikipedia entry, is an empirical observation which has been documented in studies of neurodegenerative diseases (ref. 1-6) and autoimmune diseases (ref. 17-20). The Inverse Warburg Hypothesis described in a separate Wikipedia Entry provides a biochemical and bioenergetic explanation of the Inverse Warburg effect. The model also accounts for the inverse association of cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. A significant feature of the model is the new class of therapeutic strategies proposed to prevent certain neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic autoimmune diseases, such as arthritis.

The theory has generated attention in the scientific community; reports of this work have appeared in scientific publications and the news media. Pertinent news media references are: - Harvard Gazette, 25th Feb. 2015: “A new understanding of Alzheimer’s”, by Peter Reuell (http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/02/a-new-understanding-of-alzheimers/) - Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 2nd Aug. 2015 : “Alzheimer: Heilung – wie nah ist man wirklich dran?“, by Joachim Müller-Jung (http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wissen/medizin-ernaehrung/streitgespraech-alzheimer-heilung-wie-nah-ist-man-wirklich-dran-13722068.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2) - Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), 21st Feb. 2015: „Alzheimer – Sind die Forscher auf dem Irrweg?“, by Theres Lüthi (https://www.nzz.ch/nzzas/nzz-am-sonntag/gegen-alzheimer-gibt-es-noch-immer-kein-medikament--weil-die-forscher-auf-dem-irrweg-sind-1.18483526)"

With best regards, and thanks again for your assessment

                                                        Cordula (Hasperasperagus)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasperasperagus (talkcontribs) 07:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

Inverse Warburg Effect

P.S. Regarding the fringe nature of the theory, here is an article in English, by Prof. Walter Bortz of Stanford Medical school, which you may find relevant: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/walter-m-bortz-ii-md/dare-to-be-100-gold-medal_b_7270616.html

Thanks!

       Cordula (Hasperasperagus) Hasperasperagus (talk) 11:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]