User talk:IdreamofJeanie

Deletion of Mohandas petition

As per the Wikipedia:[reliable sources (medicine)] page, only" position statements from national or international expert bodies" are allowed not individual responses. Hence deleted.

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, IdreamofJeanie, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Victoria II

the contribution i made was changing the phrase "interface that god forgot" to be "interface that got forgot" after seeing the video on youtube taken as reference to that phrase and i realized it is a mistake that needs to be corrected Ibrahim3495 (talk) 15:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Blue Monday (New Order song)

I removed the track listing you restored for the simple reason that it is fictitious. The mixes listed there do not exist, at least as mixes of "Blue Monday". The mix titles and timings are for versions of "Pacific" by 808 State and were placed there by a known vandal who has been obfuscating content relating to New Order and 808 State for a long time, as noted at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/New Order vandal. --86.165.59.49 (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect information

I was talking to Joe Laurinaitis and he and I were talking about correct information on his Wikipedia page. I corrected it Wikipedia said it was wrong but I corrected and they reverted it back — Preceding unsigned comment added by WWEEditor (talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of the KeyKeg page

Dear IdreamofJeanie, It would be great if you can send us the deleted material. It would be great if you can advice us what to change to make sure it is approved next time. We did our very best to make sure it was written according the Wikipedia rules :-(.Twee en een (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Twee en een, I do not have access to material that has been deleted from Wikipedia. If you wish to recreate an article you will need to make sure that it is not promotional, and that any information is supported by third party sources. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 08:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, IdreamofJeanie! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Geology of Victoria

Hi IdreamofJeanie,

Just a note to let you know that I have registered as a user to reinstate the edit to the Geology of Victoria page that you undid recently. The Great Dividing Range ends in Victoria west of Ararat, more than 100km west of the location that was earlier indicated in the article, the city of Ballarat. Given the nature of the article, I believe it's important to ensure the information contained is correct. Please drop me a line if you disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strudel79149 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

The Conjuring 2

Hello IdreamofJeanie. I got your message, about the edit on horror fiction and Conjuring 2. I appreciate your rationale; my wish is just to acknowledge the symbolism of the film on the site. I first tried to edit The Conjuring 2's actual page, but was repeatedly censored by another user - I'm confident that the film's symbolism is genuine, and therefore feel that it's justified to include this analysis on Wikipedia. Technically, I've included it on the page Allegory, titled Allegory in 21st Century movies, but would think it just to include perhaps on the movie's official page. What are your thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieltrokan (talk • contribs) 17:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Marieltrokan It's not my thoughts, or indeed your thoughts, that count on Wikipedia. What is required is a reputable published source that says the same thing. If there is a quote from the film maker, or a concensus among critics, that this symbolism exists, then please readd it, with a link to that source. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

The television scene in Conjuring 2 is overt symbolism: each time Bill Wilkins uses the remote, the television settles on a right-wing figure (this happens twice - first for Elizabeth II, then for Margaret Thatcher). If it were once it could easily be coincidence, but twice seems to be deliberate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieltrokan (talk • contribs) 17:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

So say you, Wikipedia relies on verifiable, published sources. This is not my opinion, it is Wikipedia's principle rule. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Why shouldn't my example be regarded as a source of verification? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieltrokan (talk • contribs) 19:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Please click >>> here <<< for an explanation. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Removed contributions from Marieltrokan (talk · contribs) due to violations of WP:V, WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Added warnings and gave information to review these policies. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Aditayadornkitikhun

nickname of Aditayadornkitikhun is Tit spells this its correct. pls see in Royal Thai General System of Transcription. --แอนเดอร์สัน (talk) 18:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

well obviously your friend disagrees. Wikipedia does not accept table-tennis editing like this. You and User:Keeratipit discuss which single spelling you want and stop warring over a single bloody letter.

i talk it in talk page of ParichatCh. this spell Tit is correct in RTGS. --แอนเดอร์สัน (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Discussion on Speedy Deletion of The Republic of East Maltby

This user, Acroterion, has deleted the page Republic of East Maltby, I understand why you have submitted the page for Speedy Deletion (Possibly as a sign to keep editing with notability.) But, Acroterion deleted it without seeing the Contest of Speedy Deletion on the talk page. I would like to submit a complaint to someone, can you help? LinkDirectory5000 (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but the page was frivolous. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Steve Truglia stuntman, SAS, SBS, etc

Regrettably 'rumours' of his death are not exaggerated. I have sourced his demise and hopefully made all the necessary tense changes. See here.
FYI, regards, 220 of ^Borg 09:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Blink Man

Even if there's a independent source (which I doubt), it's hardly a reliable souce. Moreover, the newly created article is an almost verbatim copy of that source and hence a copyright violation. Kleuske (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

I only know there is a source as I was about to Speedy it myself as a hoax. just inserted that in sense of fair play. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IdreamofJeanie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Have Some Knowledge then talk

For your kind information,the page which I made is related to Naagin Tv series, which is very popular series right now. My page represents the mistakes of that Tv series. There is nothing there on my page which represnts any activity related to my personal life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan yude (talk • contribs) 10:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your page seemes to be your opinion, and is WP:OR and is not supported by reliable outside sources, therefore not suitablke for an article in an encyclopedia, and I see that I am the third person to point this out to you, and this drivel has been deleted already. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Adebule Oluranti

with respect to you tag for deletion, I would like to tell you the article is still being written, please remove the tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahveotm (talk • contribs) 11:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Sir, If you wish to create an article it actually needs some content to start with. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

It was am error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamid819 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Square brackets

I reinstated my minor edit that you reverted. Personally I feel that square brackets to indicate a change of case are fussy and unnecessary, especially in translation. I'm not sure why they've become so popular recently as they add nothing important to a quote and make it look messy. But never mind my personal opinion; the primary source states: "Erant autem ibi scutorum…". So the original sentence does begin "There was". I added a link to an online source of the same work, which I think is an improvement in itself. Patrick Neylan (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Dylan Hartley edit undoing

The edit I made to the Dylan Hartley article consisted of the including of the weight in pounds of this international Rugby Union player. Though players' weight is nearly always included in their articles, in some cases, as in the Dylan Hartley article, the player's weight is given in kilograms and stones (or, to be precise, stones with the remainder in pounds). In other cases, such as the Mako Vuonipola article, the player's weight is given in pounds as well as kilograms and stones. This latter practice is clear to more people that might be reading the article, as, for instance, Americans would have a greater familiarity with weights in pounds, whereas British people would be more familiar with weights in stones and French people would be more familiar with weights in kilograms. The markup language used by Wikipedia provides a simple syntax to express all three weight systems, so surely it makes sense to use this syntax to provide easily accessible information to all the nations who have significant numbers of their citizens interested in Rugby Union, and in fact this has often been the decision of editors of existing articles. Dfirthc (talk) 20:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

fictional dogs

Can you correct my mistake instead of deleting it and add Rover dangerfield to the list of fictional dogs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.159.79.50 (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for edits and welcome

I am almost done DBOhio (talk) 11:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Warning of over-hastiness

Hi IdreamofJeanie, I noticed you tagged The Glorious Sons for speedy deletion with an A7 reason just 5 minutes after creation. This is not appropriate, and you should wait 30 minutes or so for non-harmful articles that would otherwise qualify for A1, A3 or A7 to give the authors a chance to finish writing. There is a high chance of an edit conflict and a newby being frustrated. So please patrol several hours into the new pages, or from the back. However attacks and copyright infringements and other serious problem pages (such as outing) can be nominated straight away. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you also tagged Sanya Malhotra for A7 a mere one minute after it had been created. As Graeme Bartlett pointed out, please wait a while before tagging new pages with A7. Tagging articles with A7 right away can end up discouraging new contributors (possibly driving them away).

In this case, Sanya Malhotra is also a copyright violation. It'd be fine to tag it under G12 right away. /wiae 🎄 20:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

"is soon going to make her Bollywood debut." She's clearly so notable she hasn't even appeared yet IdreamofJeanie (talk) 20:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, I think we agree that the subject probably doesn't meet our notability guidelines. But just make sure that when you are tagging new articles with A7, you wait at least 15 minutes after the article's creation. There's a bit of a discussion of this at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, down in the "CSD" section. Thanks, /wiae 🎄 21:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello IdreamofJeanie: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 17:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Logincare?

So I see you also tagged one of the "login care" new articles as well but I'm wondering if there is a CSD tag for potentially (or known) sites that could be dangerous for users? Does that fall under vandalism? I can't say for sure with regard to the links that the author posted (I'm at work, not willing to test it here) but there's something fishy about a 'login tutorial' that covers everything from Facebook to Paypal. Either way, I removed the links from both articles out of caution. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If the article is designed to attack or exploit Wikipedia readers, then you could use db-attack. This could happen if it exploits a weakness in the browser somehow. But please make it clear why it is nominated that way. If merely opening the page is harmful, then it will be better to request on another forum so that others will not take the risk of opening to look at it. Such a thing should likely be oversighted too. Happy Christmas anyway! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, IdreamofJeanie!

Happy New Year!

IdreamofJeanie,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Ahshani Edit Removal

Hello,

I had added some relevant details regarding this pistol which were not there and are also facts taken from the original manufacturer. Could you please help me in guiding why these edits were removed by you. Thank you Bella.black678 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

"It has an internal hammer mechanism...firm grip and safety lock system" as does just about every other hand gun. Other than that wikipedia is not a where to/how to buy guide. There really was nothing in your edit that warranted retaining in an encyclopedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Caravanserai

Hi dear! I will make and delete wrongs tomorrow and i know my page has falses — Preceding unsigned comment added by AzizaTuran (talk • contribs) 21:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I just feel adding your info to the List of caravanserais would be better overall IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Ajay V

Hi, your CSD was twice removed by the creator and twice restored by me. After the second occasion it was again quickly removed by an IP with no other edits. Not sure of the best way to deal now? Thanks, Regards, Eagleash (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Ah... never mind. Another editor has 'got it'. Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Jamie Maddison

Okay. I'll try and fix that. Maybe you should have been more specific when nominating for deletion. Deb (talk) 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Rollbacker

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 10:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Undo

Hello. You undid one of my edits because you said it was unconstructive. You said it you had made a mistake to put a message on your talk page. You made a mistake. The edit I made was constructive, and I backed it up with a reference.Chocolatebareater (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

MS BAPM

Hi,

I do not have a mal intention in creating the web page of MS BAPM. I sincerely believe that wikipedia is a primary source of information for students in India (especially). The information could be of use to them and help them in deciding. If you go through the page then you shall find that I have not concocted any information from my end. It was mere stating of facts. The only advantage of the web page is that all the relevant information has been put in one page instead of many web pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedonistic30 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Little stoke fc

Is this page going to be deleted? If so why?

Thanks Jrugsy1 (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

seeWikipedia:Notability IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello Jeanie. Thanks for your tagging of new articles with speedy templates. Just a quick suggestion. In the case of new articles like Deng Gatluak Riek, you are encouraged to wait for at least 10 minutes after the article has been created, before tagging the same with A3 or A1. Have fun and don't hesitate to ask me for any help. Thanks. Lourdes 10:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Ronnie Biggs' wife's illegal abortion

Hi IdreamofJeanie, thanks for researching and providing the cite for the diff. Reading through the context of the paragraph, Escape and Abscondment, I am now wondering if the word "illegal" is necessary. Is the purpose to demonstrate how Ronnie and his did all sorts of criminal behavior? L3X1 My Complaint Desk 19:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Promotion

So i cant promote my own school? Thats the most absurd thing ive ever heard! Honestly i have no clue why you people bother reversing the edits. Do you even live near here? I'm tired of people that have no clue what evangel is or what its about editing its page. Stop.- Kevin Miller Superintendent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evangelbrandartist (talk • contribs) 17:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

No, you can not use Wikipedia to promote your business. why is that so hard for you to understand? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Why is my 2 about Emilia and Eduardo going to get deleted

This article is based on two people who fans know and love how to You have the right to delete it CalebBenjamin012 (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Seriously? a two year old child being exploited by its parents for a few minutes' fame on the internet does not make the child itself noteworthy. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Removal of my additional content to sex dolls

Thank you for you message about my additional content. Please be aware that there was no promotional intention and I am not using Wikipedia as a 'soapbox'. It would be a help if you could let me know which parts of my information you found to be soapbox-like in order that I can adjust it. The EX lite is a foam doll that has no reference in the sex doll information page, which is what I was attempting to address in my addition to the page. CloudClimax (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

you have made (so far) three edits to wikipedia, and mentioned "CloudClimax" in each of them. If not promotionbal then I am sorry, but it certainly looks that way

February 2017

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Fall Out Boy: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

10,000 edits

Wow! This is my 10,000th edit. :-) IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Khujun

I've userfied this article at User:ItProkashSingha/Khujun. The editor is clearly new, and this seems to be their first stumbling attempt at an article. I agree that it wasn't ready for primetime as such, but deleting it within minutes of it being posted doesn't do much either. The speedy was likely a valid one, but this seems to be a better option. FYI. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 19:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting the vandalism on "taekwondo" ! Truejim (talk) 13:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

HMS Victory

Hi. I noticed your comment on my edit on HMS Victory. We aim in an article to explain words which may not be immediately familiar to the average reader. This is explained briefly at MOS:JARGON, and in more detail at Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable. Expecting readers to constantly click through to another article to uncover easily explained terms is distracting and tiresome. Where possible we aim to avoid subject specific or over-technical words, but where such words are commonly used within a subject it is helpful to both briefly explain and to link such words or phrases when first used. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for Renaming My Article

I couldn't figure out how to correct the name. I appreciate that you did so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahTehCat (talk • contribs) 17:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem, happy to help. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Telstra Media

pls dont revert my changes. somsone has pretended that telstra media is now telstras broadband product which isnt the case. so i fixed this. the original article is under Bigpond where it belongs. thanks121.209.25.45 (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Sharpe Novels

Another note please do not change any status on Chosen Men from Corunna, 16 likely live, 11 die in the novels, 2 missing in action, Trooper201 (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to HMS Sheldrake (1806)

Hi IdreamofJeanie, what does your fiddling accomplish? It expands the TOC by one line, so now we have #6 Notes, citations, and references, and #7 References. If one wants to edit "References", one can do so without giving it a separate heading. As it is, there is little need to edit on the "Notes, citations" part of item - they change in the text, not in the TOC item. I really don't see what you are trying to accomplish, especially when you do it in a thoughtless, careless way. Acad Ronin (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. The use of properly formatted headings is useful for our readers to navigate the page easily, and land, should they so desire, at the reference section, without having to then navigate through the X+Y+references section which you have created for this page. please have a look at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility#References which specifically advises against using bold markup for section headings as these are not recognised as clickable navigation points. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, the reason I reverted your reversion of my original change is that your action was clearly reflexive, done without thought or care. You introduced an error, and I see that despite your rhetoric you have not taken the time to fix the error you introduced. Had you done your reversion of my change correctly, I would have let it stand - I think you solved a non-problem, but clearly you get satisfaction out of your enforcement of WP policies, and reasonable people may differ on your change. But please, fix your change.Acad Ronin (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your error IdreamofJeanie (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Why did you take down Ethan Ulm?

Why did you take down Ethan Ulm? Elu7886 (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

What did anonymous do wrong with Ethan Ulm? The Person is real and really lives in Farmington How did you find the page as well? Elu7886 (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

According to the Farmington article "The population was 2,448 at the 2010 census," do you suggest we list them all? Er, no, we list the notable residents. Those with a Wikipedia article meet Wikipedia's definition of notability. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Have you visited the little town of Farmington Elu7886 (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Mad Sounds (band)

I think they were using it as a guide-- to no avail. A7 I'm afraid. Dlohcierekim 16:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely, but to then have left it for half an hour before coming back to actually add anything? well... IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

LOL. Don't care to speculate. Dlohcierekim 17:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I left a kitty for you

BagelFox (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Empower MediaMarketing

Hello IdreamofJeanie. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Empower MediaMarketing, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: speedy deletion requires all revisions to meet the criteria, not just the current spammy one. Thank you. SoWhy 15:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

In the future, this is the point of banning men from all over the world to discover their feet even if summer cures them but not beyond

You seem to me to protect homosexuals gay and lesbian volbybally speaking I'm sorry, but I apologize for bisexuality and heterosexuality and it's normal for everybody to do as he pleases with sex I do not care about piedicure and foot care. 87.16.191.195 (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

whatever..

It has nothing to do with censorship. Rather, it has everything to do with protecting minors

Hi,

You messaged me here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bobthewikiguy#Wikipedia_is_not_censored

I am not trying to be annoying. I just care very much about the safety of children.

Although the photo certainly looks like the model is an adult woman, it still cannot be technically verified. Not to mention, some teenage girls appear similar to adult woman also. That is why I took precautions and removed the photo.

However, if you have knowledge the photo is legal, please let me know. I am not against photos showing genitalia, just as long as they are legal.

There is absolutely nothing in the images to suggest the models are not consenting adults. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Question about Azzi article

I see you've removed an edit I made based on notability. How would we show these people as notable without needing articles on them? Ironically, those added are more relevant (and well known) than the four above them. Would a source showing their prominence be enough? Thank you, have a good day.

In retrospect I thought I'd mention that I'm a Gibran, not an Azzi (i.e. I'm not hyping my own family, I just enjoy Lebanese families due to their unique and unexpected diversity and histories). I plan on repairing most poorly written Lebanese family articles.

If they are notable, then create an article for them first. Wikipedia can not list endless numbers of people with a given name without establishing some level of Notability. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

They are notable, but these things are highly relative in a cultural sense. I don't imagine that even a properly sourced article about some prominent Lebanese men of the 19th and early 20th century would stay online for long. That being said, these three people are household names in Keserwan which houses nearly all of Lebanon's Christian population, some 1.5-2 million people, but I don't think they warrant an article. I suppose it best not to mention them at the moment. Either way, thank you for the response.

Nefertiti

Hi there. I see that you undid my edit on Nefertiti with reference to a new book. Which is this book? Thank you in advance! Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 03:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

HI. That Guardian source you quoted was litle more than a press release for "art historian" (not egyptologist) Stierlin's book. Perhaps it c ould be mentioned somewhere in body of the article, but certaibly not in the lead. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok, so I will remove the Guardian reference, but I will put back the information. You are of course most welcome to move the information to another place in the article if you think that will be better. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

I see that you once again undid my edit, now with reference to Nefertiti Bust. Have you read the source from that article that support that the bust is not a fake? I have, and it it not so heavy: "No 20th Century artist would go to the extraordinary trouble of carving a limestone bust in exquisite detail and then hiding it below a coat of plaster." For sure the situation with the authenticity is far from clear. There are arguments that supports both sides of the story. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

The arguments are dealt with reasonably on the bust's own page. The argument is about an artifact, and not the queen herself, and including them on Nefertiti page is to give undue weight to a largly disputed theory. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

I can agree about that the information belongs better in the bust's own page. My main reaction is about the comments "fringe theory" and "debunked theory" when you undid my edits. The theory is not proven to be wrong. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Why was text on testicle deleted?

Hi, why did you delete the short section on genes and proteins expressed in the testicle from the "testicle" wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figgep (talk • contribs) 08:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Comments by previous editor still apply: section on genes stuck in between sections on structures, text too close to original source to be classed as anything but copyvio, and tone too technical/specialist in comparison to rest of article. Major rework required to present it as suitable for the article. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Prince George

Do you have any any specific reason for reverting my edit? Based on the standard form, the mother's maiden name should be included in the info box, not her name and title by marriage. An example would be Elizabeth II whose mother is mentioned as Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon not Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother. Keivan.f^Talk 11:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Pubic Hair

The reasons behind my edits of the article were placed on the talk page. They also addressed concerns voiced by another editor. You have reverted my edits without any additional discussion regarding the points I made. If you want to remove the edits again, please have the courtesy to explain why on the talk page, prior to making them. Bobsd (talk) 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Peggy Oneal (Lawyer)

I've made the user the mainspace article as after a cursory review of some sources, it seems they're probably notable (either way it's a good redirect to have). I don't think the draft will be needed anymore. Are you fine with having it being G7'd (I'd need your permission, of course)? Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

No probs - I have done that, cheers. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Pending Changes

Please after you make changes in pages under pending changes you should volunteer and accept the changes. Because when editor without PCR right edits a page which is under PC and you didn't accept the edits first before making yours, both will remain pending and add to recurring backlog like your edit here Thanks. -Ammarpad (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Duplication

Thanks for spotting the duplication in 1818 in literature. I've confirmed that The History of the Fairchild Family is a children's book and kept the entry in the Children's section rather than the one in Fiction. Best, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Brooklyn Bridge‎

Thank you for reverting my mistaken revert. Apologies. Attic Salt (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Deleting Finland Naturism in Europe

I, the reason of the picture is to demonstrate the essence of naturism in a natural setting like naturism is­. Naturism is natural and some of the pictures in your article show nude people who not naturist but nudist and some of those naturist picture dont show the human body in a natural way. Like in Finland culture, alot of naturist keep their body natural like the way the picture demonstrate it. Alot of those picture show more of West Culture nudist but where the natural naturist ? Tx you alot for your interest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngman24 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I didn't write my page please don't delete it

Hi I did not write my page, but I have been editing it because of mistakes made by the writer. I think I am the best person to make these corrections. I did add a Chronology though. Now I see it has reverted to the original which has a lot of innacuracies. What can I do about this? Sarahswenson (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sarahswenson. Generaly Wikipedia frowns on people editting their own web pages - if you are correcting small, verifiable errors and can provide a source for them that would be ok, but you will need to provide a source as generally people, naturally enough, tend to view themselves in a genrally positive light, and Wikipedia does insist on strict neutrality. Adding a full list of works and everything you have done looks far to much like self publicity and wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself (or anyone else). IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Otto engine

I understand why my edit to Otto engine was reverted; however, it was in response to a query on the reference desk (here). If you can improve the article by clarifying this use of the term, please do so. —2606:A000:4C0C:E200:E958:86E3:541F:E7F1 (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)