Talk:Waymo
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Alphabet Task Force
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Waymo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Text and/or other creative content from Google self-driving car was copied or moved into Autonomous car with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xicong Liu, 8023kk (article contribs).
Requested move 13 December 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Λυδαcιτγ 21:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Google self-driving car → Waymo – Google's self driving car project was a part of X, a subsidiary of Alphabet. It has been spun out into it's own company under the Alphabet umbrella. For this reason, the title of the article must be changed to Waymo. Thunderbolt.wiki (talk) 21:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Seems reasonable to me. -- The Anome (talk) 21:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Rename and move. Per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA, the renamed title Waymo is precise (Waymo is the company name and therefore unambiguous), natural (the spinoff is named Waymo and the cars bear this badge), and concise (the project has an official name now, so "Google self-driving car" does not need to be written out completely, even if it were accurate). Furthermore, the project has not been a part of Google since X split out of the company, and the Google nomenclature has officially been removed. While it may be likely that people will search for "Google self-driving car" still, I believe it is better moving forward to rename and redirect from the previous name, and make a note in the first sentence of the article, i.e. "Waymo, formerly the Google Self-Driving Car project, ...". -Metropantograph (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Move -- this is accurate, supported by reliable sources, and not likely to be contested in any way. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Rename/move this is very accurate and the new article should just retain mentions that Waymo was formerly Google's self-driving car.[1] Ferrari250 (talk) 00:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Move The name of the company has changed, so the article name should follow. --Frmorrison (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daylen (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support with some structural changes to the prose, to change it from talking about a project to about a company which is undertaking said project. --Natural RX 16:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Licensing vs. Transportation as a service
The opening of the article states:
This move represents a pivot of sorts as Google moves to license its self-driving technology to third-party companies including automakers and ride-hailing firms as opposed to building their own transportation as a service company.
What is the citation for this? In the today's blog post from the CEO[1], it is stated that "We can see our technology being useful in personal vehicles, ridesharing, logistics, or solving last mile problems for public transport" but also that "Our next step as Waymo will be to let people use our vehicles to do everyday things like run errands, commute to work, or get safely home after a night on the town." From what I can see, there's equal reasoning to guess either a licensing or first-party approach, and there has not been any official statement for which route Waymo will be taking. -Metropantograph (talk) 04:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://medium.com/waymo/say-hello-to-waymo-whats-next-for-google-s-self-driving-car-project-b854578b24ee#.bqg8ze23a.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)
I've removed the sentence, as this was an uncited claim into their business strategy, and I have been unable to find a citation. I will continue to look for one, and the original author is, of course, welcome to revert the edit given they can find a citation. -Metropantograph (talk) 14:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Monthly Crash Reports
The citation/link for the monthly crash reports is now incorrect, it leads to a Waymo landing page. I don't know if Google/Waymo will continue to publish the reports and if they do, where they'll be located. Either way, the Crashes section needs updating. --SnowmanJames (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Bad page move
I don't like the page move, because this article is not about the company (compare Tesla) but about its one and only project: trying to build an autonomous car that doesn't require a driver. Can we please split this article into two parts:
- Waymo, about the company itself
- Google Self-Driving Car Project, about Google/Alphabet's efforts to field a completely self-driving car
One of my concerns is that the press almost always refers to Google's semi-autonomous test vehicles as "self-driving", although they all carry a test driver and are actually being driven by a human up to 20% of the time. The article and its title should reflect this fact - not hide it. --Uncle Ed (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible spin-off
Almost all of this article is about Waymo's Self-driving car project. And nearly all of that project was carried on when the project was a unit of Google.
I'd like to divide the article into
- the company itself (i.e., Waymo); and,
- its self-driving car project
I might just get started, since I don't anticipate any objections; I mean it's not political like Michael Brown (Ferguson incident), is it? --Uncle Ed (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Not a credible source for 2020 date
[1] The source says Google says, but doesn't state context. There are other contradictory references, for example on Waymo fact it says the following:
- Our next step will be to let people trial fully self-driving cars to do everyday things like run errands or commute to work.
https://waymo.com/faq/ I've removed it from the intro. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 07:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Collaboration with Lyft?
Worth mentioning the potential collaboration of Waymo and Lyft? https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/14/lyft-and-waymo-to-team-up-on-self-driving-cars/ Michael Ten (talk) 20:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Proposing update to Technology section
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at A. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Hi there! On behalf of Waymo, I'd like to request some updates throughout this article, which is quite outdated in places. Previously, the article contained lengthy detail about self-driving technology and related topics that did not necessarily belong in the Waymo article, but recent updates to address those issues have already helped focus this article on the company. With that said, there are still some issues in the article that I'd like to help address. I've researched Waymo and created a full draft of what an updated article could look like based on secondary sourcing and in line with Wikipedia's standards. You can see my full-article draft in my user space. I've also made this diff to compare my draft with the current article.
This is a large article with many opportunities for updates throughout: some small, and some that are a little larger. To not overwhelm reviewing editors, I'll split up my proposed updates and share them section-by-section. I'd like to start with a proposed update for the Technology section, as it has some straightforward edits needed to address outdated information that is currently written in the present tense. As a consequence, the information is confusing and misleading in places. Below, you can see my proposed changes (green text is new, strikethrough is text I propose cutting), the proposed new draft, and the markup for the proposed draft ready to be added into the article in place of the current section.
The updates that I am proposing for Technology are:
- Copy editing and correcting verb tense
- Adding Waymo's in-house hardware and its effects on cost and integration with Waymo technology
- Adding Carcraft, Waymo's virtual testing world
- Adding partnerships
- Adding details on vehicles using Waymo technology
- Deleting outdated details on the systems and hardware used on vehicles
In 2017, Waymo unveiled new sensors and chips that are less expensive to manufacture, cameras that improve visibility and wipers to clear the lidar system.[2] Waymo manufactures a suite of self-driving hardware developed in-house.[3] These sensors and hardware—enhanced vision system, improved radar, and laser-based lidar—reduce Waymo's dependence on suppliers.[3][4] The in-house production system allows Waymo to efficiently integrate its technology to the hardware.[5] In the beginning of the self-driving car program, the company spent $75,000 for each lidar system.[5] As of 2017, that cost was down approximately 90 percent, due to Waymo designing its own version of lidar.[6] Waymo officials said the cars the company uses are built for full autonomy with sensors that give 360 views and lasers that detect objects up to 300 meters away.[4] Short-range lasers detect and focus on objects near the vehicle, while radar is used to see around vehicles and track objects in motion.[4] The interior of these cars include buttons for riders to control certain functions: "Help", "Lock", "Pull over", and "Start ride".[7]
Waymo engineers have also created a program called Carcraft, a virtual world where Waymo can simulate driving conditions.[8][9] The simulator is named after the video game World of Warcraft.[8][9] With Carcraft, 25,000 virtual self-driving cars navigate through models of Austin, Texas, Mountain View, California, Phoenix, Arizona, and other cities.[8] As of 2018[update], Waymo has driven more than 5 billion miles in the virtual world.[10]
Waymo has created partnerships with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles,[4] Lyft,[4] AutoNation,[11] Avis,[4] Intel,[12] and Jaguar Land Rover.[13]
The Waymo project team has equipped various types of cars with the self-driving equipment, including the Toyota Prius, Audi TT, Fiat Chrysler Pacifica and Lexus RX450h.[14][15] Google has also developed their own custom vehicle, about 100 of which is were assembled by Roush Enterprises and uses with equipment from Bosch, ZF Lenksysteme, LG, and Continental.[16][17]
As of June 2014[update], the system used a map of the area the vehicle is expected to use, with features described to a precision of one inch, including how high the traffic lights are. In addition to on-board systems, some computation is performed on remote computer farms.[18]
In May 2016, Google and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced an order of 100 Chrysler Pacifica hybrid minivans to test the self-driving technology.[19] Waymo ordered an additional 500 Pacifica hybrids in 2017 and in late May 2018, Alphabet announced plans to add up to 62,000 Pacifica Hybrid minivans to the fleet.[20][21] In March 2018, Jaguar Land Rover announced that Waymo had ordered up to 20,000 of Jaguar's its planned electric I-Pace electric vehicles cars, at an estimated cost more than $1 billion.[22][23] Jaguar is to deliver the first I-Pace prototype later in the year, and the cars are to become part of Waymo's ride-hailing service in 2020.[24][25][26]
Google's robotic cars have[when?] about $150,000 in equipment including a $70,000 LIDAR system.[citation needed] The rangefinder mounted on the top is a Velodyne 64-beam laser. This laser allows the vehicle to generate a detailed 3D map of its environment. The car then takes these generated maps and combines them with high-resolution maps of the world, producing different types of data models that allow it to drive itself.[27]
In 2017, Waymo unveiled new sensors and chips that are less expensive to manufacture, cameras that improve visibility and wipers to clear the lidar system.[2] Waymo manufactures a suite of self-driving hardware developed in-house.[3] These sensors and hardware—enhanced vision system, improved radar, and laser-based lidar—reduce Waymo's dependence on suppliers.[3][4] The in-house production system allows Waymo to efficiently integrate its technology to the hardware.[5] In the beginning of the self-driving car program, the company spent $75,000 for each lidar system.[5] As of 2017, that cost was down approximately 90 percent, due to Waymo designing its own version of lidar.[6] Waymo officials said the cars the company uses are built for full autonomy with sensors that give 360 views and lasers that detect objects up to 300 meters away.[4] Short-range lasers detect and focus on objects near the vehicle, while radar is used to see around vehicles and track objects in motion.[4] The interior of these cars include buttons for riders to control certain functions: "Help", "Lock", "Pull over", and "Start ride".[7]
Waymo engineers have also created a program called Carcraft, a virtual world where Waymo can simulate driving conditions.[8][9] The simulator is named after the video game World of Warcraft.[8][9] With Carcraft, 25,000 virtual self-driving cars navigate through models of Austin, Texas, Mountain View, California, Phoenix, Arizona, and other cities.[8] As of 2018[update], Waymo has driven more than 5 billion miles in the virtual world.[10]
Waymo has created partnerships with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles,[4] Lyft,[4] AutoNation,[11] Avis,[4] Intel,[12] and Jaguar Land Rover.[13]
The Waymo project team has equipped various types of cars with the self-driving equipment, including the Toyota Prius, Audi TT, Fiat Chrysler Pacifica and Lexus RX450h.[14][30] Google also developed their own custom vehicle, about 100 of which were assembled by Roush Enterprises with equipment from Bosch, ZF Lenksysteme, LG, and Continental.[16][17]
In May 2016, Google and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced an order of 100 Chrysler Pacifica hybrid minivans to test the self-driving technology.[19] Waymo ordered an additional 500 Pacifica hybrids in 2017 and in late May 2018, Alphabet announced plans to add up to 62,000 Pacifica Hybrid minivans to the fleet.[20][31] In March 2018, Jaguar Land Rover announced that Waymo had ordered up to 20,000 of its planned electric I-Pace cars, at an estimated cost more than $1 billion.[22][23] Jaguar is to deliver the first I-Pace prototype later in the year, and the cars are to become part of Waymo's ride-hailing service in 2020.[32][33][34]
Waymo partners with Intel to use Intel technologies, such as processors, inside Waymo vehicles.[35] Its deals with Avis and AutoNation are for vehicle maintenance.[11] With Lyft, Waymo is partnering on pilot projects and product development.[29]==Technology==
[[File:Google driverless car at intersection.gk.jpg|thumb|A self-driving car with the previous Google branding]][[File:Google's Lexus RX 450h Self-Driving Car.jpg|thumb|A [[Lexus RX450h]] retrofitted by Google for its self-driving car project]]<br/>
In 2017, Waymo unveiled new sensors and chips that are less expensive to manufacture, cameras that improve visibility and wipers to clear the lidar system.<ref name="Bergen17">{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-16/waymo-s-next-challenge-making-driverless-passengers-feels-safe |title=Waymo Tests Hardware to Ease Passenger Fears of Driverless Cars |authors=Mark Bergen Alistair Barr |date=16 May 2017 |publisher=[[Bloomberg]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> Waymo manufactures a suite of self-driving hardware developed in-house.<ref name="Gibbs17">{{cite news |title=Google sibling Waymo launches fully autonomous ride-hailing service |last1=Gibbs |first1=Samuel |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/07/google-waymo-announces-fully-autonomous-ride-hailing-service-uber-alphabet |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=7 November 2017 |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> These sensors and hardware—enhanced vision system, improved radar, and laser-based lidar—reduce Waymo's dependence on suppliers.<ref name="Gibbs17"/><ref name="Hawkins17"/> The in-house production system allows Waymo to efficiently integrate its technology to the hardware.<ref name="Adams17">{{cite web |url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/everything-you-need-to-know-waymo/ |title=Everything you need to know about Waymo’s self-driving car project |author=Dallon Adams |date=26 April 2017 |publisher=[[Digital Trends]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> In the beginning of the self-driving car program, the company spent $75,000 for each lidar system.<ref name="Adams17"/> As of 2017, that cost was down approximately 90 percent, due to Waymo designing its own version of lidar.<ref name="Amadeo17">{{cite web |url=https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/01/googles-waymo-invests-in-lidar-technology-cuts-costs-by-90-percent/ |title=Google’s Waymo invests in LIDAR technology, cuts costs by 90 percent |author=Ron Amadeo |date=9 January 2017 |publisher=[[Ars Technica]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> Waymo officials said the cars the company uses are built for full autonomy with sensors that give 360 views and lasers that detect objects up to 300 meters away.<ref name="Hawkins17"/> Short-range lasers detect and focus on objects near the vehicle, while radar is used to see around vehicles and track objects in motion.<ref name="Hawkins17"/> The interior of these cars include buttons for riders to control certain functions: "Help", "Lock", "Pull over", and "Start ride".<ref name="della Cava17">{{cite news |title=Waymo shows off the secret facility where it trains self-driving cars |last1=della Cava |first1=Marco |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/10/31/waymo-self-driving-cars-go-school-here/815627001/ |newspaper=[[USA Today]] |date=31 October 2017 |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref><br/>
Waymo engineers have also created a program called Carcraft, a virtual world where Waymo can simulate driving conditions.<ref name="Madrigal17">{{cite news |title=Inside Waymo's Secret World for Training Self-Driving Cars |last1=Madrigal |first1=Alexis C. |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/08/inside-waymos-secret-testing-and-simulation-facilities/537648/ |newspaper=[[The Atlantic]] |date=23 August 2017 |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref><ref name="Seppala17">{{cite web |url=https://www.engadget.com/2017/08/23/waymo-virtual-world-carcraft/ |title='Carcraft' is Waymo's virtual world for autonomous vehicle testing |author=Timothy J. Seppala |date=23 August 2017 |publisher=[[Engadget]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> The simulator is named after the [[video game]] ''[[World of Warcraft]]''.<ref name="Madrigal17"/><ref name="Seppala17"/> With Carcraft, 25,000 virtual self-driving cars navigate through models of Austin, Texas, [[Mountain View, California]], Phoenix, Arizona, and other cities.<ref name="Madrigal17"/> {{As of|2018}}, Waymo has driven more than 5 billion miles in the virtual world.<ref name="Ohnsman18">{{cite web |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2018/03/02/waymo-is-millions-of-miles-ahead-in-robot-car-tests-does-it-need-a-billion-more/#719d148b1ef4 |title=Waymo Is Millions Of Miles Ahead In Robot Car Tests; Does It Need A Billion More? |author=Alan Ohnsman |date=2 March 2018 |publisher=[[Forbes]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref><br/>
Waymo has created partnerships with [[Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]],<ref name="Hawkins17"/> [[Lyft]],<ref name="Hawkins17"/> [[AutoNation]],<ref name="Boudette17">{{cite news |title=Waymo Enlists AutoNation to Maintain Driverless Test Fleet |last1=Boudette |first1=Neal E. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/business/waymo-autonation-driverless.html |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=2 November 2017 |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> [[Avis]],<ref name="Hawkins17"/> [[Intel]],<ref name="Novet17">{{cite web |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/18/alphabets-waymo-self-driving-cars-use-intel-chips.html |title=Google's self-driving cars have been using Intel chips this whole time |author=Jordan Novet |date=18 September 2017 |publisher=[[CNBC]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref> and [[Jaguar Land Rover]].<ref name="Bergen18">{{cite news |title=Waymo isn't going to slow down now |last1=Bergen |first1=Mark |last2=Naughton |first2=Keith |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-04-02/waymo-isn-t-slowing-down-pact-with-honda-could-include-delivery |newspaper=[[Bloomberg]] |date=2 April 2018 |accessdate=12 June 2018}}</ref><br/>
The Waymo project team has equipped various types of cars with the self-driving equipment, including the Toyota Prius, [[Audi TT]], [[Fiat Automobiles|Fiat]] [[Chrysler Pacifica (RU)|Chrysler Pacifica]] and [[Lexus RX450h]].<ref name="Wired2012">{{cite news|author=Damon Lavrinc|url=https://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/04/google-autonomous-lexus-rx450h/|title=Exclusive: Google Expands Its Autonomous Fleet With Hybrid Lexus RX450h|work=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]|date=April 16, 2012|accessdate=April 24, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/07/google-waymo-announces-fully-autonomous-ride-hailing-service-uber-alphabet|title=Google sibling Waymo launches fully autonomous ride-hailing service|last=Gibbs|first=Samuel|date=2017-11-07|work=The Guardian|access-date=2017-12-03|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Google also developed their own custom vehicle, about 100 of which were assembled by [[Roush Enterprises]] with equipment from [[Robert Bosch GmbH|Bosch]], [[ZF Friedrichshafen|ZF Lenksysteme]], [[LG Electronics|LG]], and [[Continental AG|Continental]].<ref name=crainsroush>{{cite web|url=http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20140528/NEWS/140529850/roush-to-assemble-google-self-driving-cars-in-allen-park-sources-say |title=Crain's Detroit Business : Subscription Center|work=crainsdetroit.com}}</ref><ref name=autonewsoems>{{cite web|url=http://www.autonews.com/article/20150114/OEM09/150119815/google-in-talks-with-oems-suppliers-to-build-self-driving-cars|title=Google in talks with OEMs, suppliers to build self-driving cars|work=Automotive News}}</ref><br/>
In May 2016, Google and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced an order of 100 Chrysler Pacifica hybrid minivans to test the self-driving technology.<ref name="Ebhardt16">{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-03/fiat-google-said-to-plan-partnership-on-self-driving-minivans |title=Fiat, Google Plan Partnership on Self-Driving Minivans |author=Tommaso Ebhardt |date=3 May 2016}}</ref> Waymo ordered an additional 500 Pacifica hybrids in 2017 and in late May 2018, Alphabet announced plans to add up to 62,000 Pacifica Hybrid minivans to the fleet.<ref name="Hawkins18">{{cite web |url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/30/16948356/waymo-google-fiat-chrysler-pacfica-minivan-self-driving |title=Waymo strikes a deal to buy ‘thousands’ more self-driving minivans from Fiat Chrysler |author=Andrew J. Hawkins |date=30 January 2018 |publisher=[[The Verge]] |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=della Cava |first1=Marco |title=Waymo will add up to 62,000 FCA minivans to self-driving fleet |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/05/31/waymo-add-up-62-000-fca-minivans-self-driving-fleet/659160002/ |website=USA TODAY |accessdate=1 June 2018 |language=en}}</ref> In March 2018, [[Jaguar Land Rover]] announced that Waymo had ordered up to 20,000 of its planned electric I-Pace cars, at an estimated cost more than $1 billion.<ref name="Higgins18">{{cite news |title=Waymo Orders Up to 20,000 Jaguar SUVs for Driverless Fleet |last1=Higgins |first1=Tim |last2=Dawson |first2=Chester |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/waymo-orders-up-to-20-000-jaguar-suvs-for-driverless-fleet-1522159944 |newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=27 March 2018 |accessdate=13 June 2018}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/27/waymo-self-driving-taxis-jaguar-land-rover |title=Jaguar to supply 20,000 cars to Google's self-driving spin-off Waymo|last=Topham|first=Gwyn|date=2018-03-27|website=the Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-03-28}}</ref> Jaguar is to deliver the first I-Pace prototype later in the year, and the cars are to become part of Waymo's ride-hailing service in 2020.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/27/17165992/waymo-jaguar-i-pace-self-driving-ny-auto-show-2018|title=Waymo and Jaguar will build up to 20,000 self-driving electric SUVs|work=The Verge|access-date=2018-03-28}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/waymo-teams-up-with-jaguar-to-intro-a-new-premium-self-driving-car/|title=Waymo teams up with Jaguar to intro a new, premium self-driving car – TechCrunch|website=techcrunch.com|language=en-US|access-date=2018-03-28}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/03/27/jaguar-land-rover-supply-self-driving-cars-googles-waymo/|title=Jaguar Land Rover lands £1.2bn deal to supply self-driving cars to Google's Waymo|last=Tovey|first=Alan|date=2018-03-27|work=The Telegraph|access-date=2018-03-28|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235}}</ref><br/>
Since I do have a financial conflict of interest, I won't edit the article myself and am looking for uninvolved editors to review and make changes as appropriate.
I've noticed that Daniel.Cardenas and Merxistan have recently made constructive edits to this article. Would either of you be interested and able to look into this request? Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Rhiannon. Recommend you go ahead and make the updates. If there is a conflict we can go back to talking on this talk page. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Daniel.Cardenas. I follow the "bright line" and don't edit where I have a conflict of interest, instead seeking uninvolved editors to consider my proposed updates. Would you be willing to review my suggested edits? I'm happy to discuss any issues or answer questions here. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 03:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hello @16912 Rhiannon:, thank you for following Wikipedia's "conflict of interest" guideline. If you don't find a regular article editor with enough time (of course we are all volunteers here editing in our free time), please use Template:request edit in your message. The template will add your request to a queue for requested reviews, so your suggestions are more visible and won't get lost. It might take a bit of time, but the queue isn't very busy currently. Editors with a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged from editing such articles themselves - it's better to let an uninvolved editor review and implement your suggestion, as you mentioned. Hope this helps. GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, GermanJoe. For this request (and others I make here) I'm really hoping that editors familiar with the topic will weigh in and review my suggestions, so I'm going to hold off on using the request edit template. I'm in no rush and am happy to wait or look around for folks who might be interested to help. I'll definitely consider using the template if needed. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 00:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks 16912 Rhiannon for putting together updated information for the article. I have edited the page accordingly, including most of the proposed changes throughout the full article. Merxistan (talk) 20:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the review and updating the article, Merxistan, I really appreciate the thorough look at my request and the new draft. Everything looks great, though I'll be sure to ping back here if I spot anything that I have a follow-up question about. And thanks for your patience; I've been traveling over the last week and half. In case you'd be interested to take a peek, I also have a request for John Krafcik's article, too. If not, no worries and thanks again for your help here! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 22:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks 16912 Rhiannon for putting together updated information for the article. I have edited the page accordingly, including most of the proposed changes throughout the full article. Merxistan (talk) 20:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, GermanJoe. For this request (and others I make here) I'm really hoping that editors familiar with the topic will weigh in and review my suggestions, so I'm going to hold off on using the request edit template. I'm in no rush and am happy to wait or look around for folks who might be interested to help. I'll definitely consider using the template if needed. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 00:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hello @16912 Rhiannon:, thank you for following Wikipedia's "conflict of interest" guideline. If you don't find a regular article editor with enough time (of course we are all volunteers here editing in our free time), please use Template:request edit in your message. The template will add your request to a queue for requested reviews, so your suggestions are more visible and won't get lost. It might take a bit of time, but the queue isn't very busy currently. Editors with a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged from editing such articles themselves - it's better to let an uninvolved editor review and implement your suggestion, as you mentioned. Hope this helps. GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Daniel.Cardenas. I follow the "bright line" and don't edit where I have a conflict of interest, instead seeking uninvolved editors to consider my proposed updates. Would you be willing to review my suggested edits? I'm happy to discuss any issues or answer questions here. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 03:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Proposed updates at John Krafcik
Hi all! Wondering if editors watching this page might be interested in my request to update the article for CEO John Krafcik. While I have prepared a full updated draft for the article (which you can see in my user space), to start off with something simple I'm suggesting the addition of an Early life and education section, as is common in biography articles.
I am here on behalf of Waymo as part of my work with Beutler Ink. Since I do have a financial conflict of interest, I won't edit the article myself and am looking for uninvolved editors to review and make changes as appropriate. If anyone here has a little time to look at this request, it would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Question on key people
Hi @Merxistan: I wonder if Tatyana Bezuglova can be removed from the infobox's key people parameter, as she is not a high-level executive at Waymo, and does not appear to meet the criteria defined at Template:Infobox_company#Parameters. Specifically, the template states: "Generally list prominent, current executives within the company holding key positions such as chairman, chief executive officer, president, VP of design, etc., but do not list roles below chief officer level if they are not notable." Also, the citation provided does not list Tatyana Bezuglova.
Since I do have a financial conflict of interest as I am here on behalf of Waymo as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I won't edit the article myself and am looking for uninvolved editors to review and make changes as appropriate. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 18:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- 16912 Rhiannon, those are good points. I removed her as one of the listed key people. Merxistan (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your help here, Merxistan, much appreciated! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC) Resolved
- Thanks again for your help here, Merxistan, much appreciated! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
California Crash reports and AV safety
Waymo is required to report Crashes in CA. These are much more frequent than public reports or death and injury reports and so offer a better insight into the effectiveness of the self driving software. However, they obviously are biased in many ways. For instance, it seems clear that shadow drivers attempt to take control and report that they were in control after each crash. So, when the AV is stopped at a light or stop sign and then involved in a crash (e.g. rear ended) the report says the AV was under manual control. Still, given a reasonable assumption that all AV companies are doing the same thing, we can get an estimate of improvement over time by looking at how many AVs a company has, how many miles they drove, and how many crashes they report. Waymo seems the clear leader in 2018, with a rate that is only slightly higher than novice drivers (1,000 to 2,000 crashes per 100 million miles). Someone should analyze this and report about it in this article. [1] Imersion (talk) 14:12, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Who is saying that the shadow driver is falsely reporting the circumstances? What is your source? MartinezMD (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Request edit on 27 December 2019
Some proposed changes
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Waymo. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Information to be added or removed: Amee Chande (CCO)[1] should be removed from the Key People list Explanation of issue: Amee Chande left Waymo in October 2019 and therefore should no longer be listed as Waymo's Chief Commercial Officer References supporting change: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ameechande/ 2600:1700:1150:E830:DC61:44EF:CC1B:1FE7 (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- B-Class Automobile articles
- High-importance Automobile articles
- B-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Google articles
- High-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- B-Class Robotics articles
- High-importance Robotics articles
- WikiProject Robotics articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates