User talk:RegentsPark: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Hindi: reply
Line 283: Line 283:
FYI: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dipendra2007 sockpuppet investigation for WarunaNugawela]. --[[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|talk]]) 03:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
FYI: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dipendra2007 sockpuppet investigation for WarunaNugawela]. --[[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|talk]]) 03:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
:Commented there. This is quacking so loudly it doesn't really need an SPI but since there is one, I'll let someone else do the block. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 11:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
:Commented there. This is quacking so loudly it doesn't really need an SPI but since there is one, I'll let someone else do the block. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 11:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

== Request for clarification regarding Jerusalem RFC ==

A [[WP:ARCA#Clarification request: WP:ARBPIA/Jerusalem|request for clarification]] has been submitted regarding the ArbCom mandated Jerusalem RFC process. '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 01:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:19, 29 April 2013

Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka

You banned me for not going with consensus made | here. Now I have removed all the factual errors mentioned by obinicanibe2 and removed the tag. But without mentioning further factual issues he is introducing tags. You should be fair and take action against him/her. You banned me for not complying with consensus made by obinicanibe2 and Qyrwaxion. Now you should ban obinicanibe2 for not complying consensus made by himself and Qyrwaxion. I suggest you should ban him from introducing tags to SL articles like you did to me. If that function is not available please do a page ban. --Himesh84 (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Himesh. I'm traveling and don't have the time to dig deep into this. Could you contact Qwyrxian or some other admin? Thanks. --regentspark (comment) 13:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No. I will wait until your arrival. I am feared any other admin will block obini2canibe ( Sorry. I can't remember his name. He had mistakenly interchange username and password) forever for ruin this page by taking opposite stands on same matter time to time.Please look into this matter when you come back safe. Happy safe journey !!! --Himesh84 (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any feedback on this matter ? --Himesh84 (talk) 11:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look and reply on the article talk page. I'm assuming the relevant article is Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. --regentspark (comment) 14:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --regentspark (comment) 17:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

India

Hi,This User:Sushilkumarmishra is making rapid changes here without duscussing and adding non-free images.---zeeyanwiki discutez 20:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monitoring. Perhaps he'll take Dwai's suggestion and discuss his proposed changes on the talk page. Let's see. --regentspark (comment) 20:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

Admin nom noticeboard

If you are interested in starting that up, I'm willing to help. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 01:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Not sure how it'll work but we won't know until we try! Let's give it a go. (I probably won't have much time till Monday so feel free to start something in your sandbox.) --regentspark (comment) 10:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caste system in India

You';ve just reverted a contribution by Indopug around the same time that I reverted a change made by them at Herbert Hope Risley which dealt with more or less the same point. I left a note on their talk page but before I ask at WP:RX for a copy of the Cambridge Journals-hosted source referenced in the edit you reverted, I wonder whether you have a copy/access to it? A 50 y.o. source for caste theory is likely to be outdated but I'd like to read it in connection with the Risley article because I hope one day to take that to FAC. - Sitush (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do have access to the journal, but only physical copies. I'll try to make a library visit on Monday. --regentspark (comment) 17:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Darn t, I meant Indoscope above. Thanks but don't go out of your way - I'll get it via WP:RX, where some people seem to have access to Cambridge Journals from their own home/student accommodation etc. - Sitush (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The library is only a couple of blocks away so it's not a big deal. Let me know if you can't get it the easy way. --regentspark (comment) 17:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've got it via RX, thanks. A first, quick glance at the thing shows no mention of Risley, which makes the Indoscope contributions even more out of place. Perhaps my eyes are failing me. - Sitush (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I should be surprised, shocked even :) --regentspark (comment) 21:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Surprised/shocked concerning the contributions or my eyesight? Given my recent horrendous misjudgement at Ezhava, well, anything could happen. My effort there was off-beam and I am struggling to fathom my choice of words given that I am well aware of the general usage for "untouchability" in Kerala, the lunatic asylum of castes. If you have the time and inclination, then perhaps you could read the thing yourself? I do understand the point that the contributor was trying to make but the Risley connection just does not seem to be there in the source. But given recent events I feel that I cannot trust my own judgement. - Sitush (talk) 00:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I meant shocked and surprised that Indoscope would add something that wasn't even in the cited article! Don't over think things, you're doing a great job here.--regentspark (comment) 01:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Close merge

Could you please close the merge discussion on Mohammed_Nizamul_Huq and Ahmed Ziauddin? I already did it, but Darkness Shines can't accept that that his deletion requests and now his merge requests are not working out his way? Thank you, Crtew (talk) 07:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it needs to be formally closed. But, clearly there is no consensus so if anyone tries to merge the two, let me know. I also dropped a note on DSs page letting him know that the tag can't stay on for ever. --regentspark (comment) 13:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project for RfA nominators

As one of the supporters of the proposal in the 2013 RfC on RfA reform, you are invited to join the new WikiProject for RfA nominators. Please come and help shape this initiative. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

joined. --regentspark (comment) 18:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic user

I was wondering if you could drop a message, or a warning, to Chaiyan anantasat (talk · contribs). All this user seems to be doing is changing a bunch of links to what they feel should be the correct wording, even though this is leading to redlinks. I've asked them to stop on their talkpage, but am getting no response, and not even edit summaries are used. It seems they took similar actions and received similar warnings in earlier bouts of editing as well. Regards, CMD (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warned. --regentspark (comment) 14:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, hopefully that'll work. If you don't mind another question, do we have a clear policy on articles like the new French Comoros? Is it a potential copyvio? It's entirely unsourced, and it appears from the users talkpage that they had a similar issue with another article in the past. I'll drop a note on their talkpage. CMD (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The material is lifted from History of Comoros. I've restored the redirect. --regentspark (comment) 12:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back

This user has now come back to do exactly the same things. CMD (talk) 15:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for a week. My guess is he/she will be back so we may need escalating blocks. --regentspark (comment) 17:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes

Hi. New sources makes it notable company now. Can you recover the page and i can find more notable sources and edit the page. thank you in advance. Below links; Institute of Geophysics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. http://www.igph.kiev.ua/GNFE/GNFE_Halilov_ENG.htm Pakistan National Centre for Physics http://www.ncp.edu.pk/ces.php Isark Vali (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When I deleted it, I moved it into userspace here. Easiest to make your modifications there for the time being. BTW, the two sources you've provided are not reliable sources and are not enough. You should look for something in the news that clearly makes an assertion that GNFE is a notable organization. --regentspark (comment) 12:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this two links is governmental. and that fact DON'T prove notability of network (GNFE)? besides there have links in Turkish and İndonesian. http://ugm.ac.id/ugm/en/news/5469-ugm.researchers.perform.atropatena.research.for.earthquake.prediction http://www.maipark.com/news/detail/news/under-research-atropatena-as-a-tool-for-earthquake-prediction http://www.milliyet.com.tr/prof-dr-halilov-japonya-nin-tehlikede-oldugunu-soylemisti/dunya/haberdetay/12.03.2011/1363227/default.htm thank you for helpIsark Vali (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The links only demonstrate the existence of GNFE, which was not the issue in the deletion discussion. An organization becomes notable only when it is reviewed, discussed, or featured in reliable secondary sources. You need to find something, a news story perhaps, where the organization is featured or mentioned in a non-peripheral way. --regentspark (comment) 12:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Meetup NYC this Sunday April 14

Hi RegentsPark! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 17:45, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBIPA

Per principal 1 & 4 of this arbitration finding I am going to replace Mar4d on the list of editors warned for this I would appreciate your advice beforehand. I also need to point out this Which I believe he said he would stop. I did not pass myself off as an admin, and he knows that yet continues to repeat it. Darkness Shines (talk) 04:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be my guest. Be assured that if you do that, I'll be the first one to revert. I cannot stand blatant WP:POV-pushing and my stance on that article is clear. Also, tendentious, consensus-violating and dispute-escalating actions like these are not going to earn you any brownie points. If anything, it is only fast convincing me that a topic ban discussion is in order soon. Mar4d (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
DS, I don't think what Mar4d says is a violation. Strong perhaps, and the what world part would have been better left out, but the comment is largely about content. I'd just ignore it, we've all seen a lot worse. --regentspark (comment) 12:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You say we all should ignore a slew of direct vituperation against dissenters? That Pakistani Mar4d wrote in the edit summary "you're a joke". On the talk he wrote, "Let me get this right, you're just being the typical hardcore fundamentalist/nationalist POV-pusher that you usually are." -- can he prove that I am a fundamentalist (assuming that comment was directed at me)? A warning from you perhaps would have been better.
    I think when we ask DS not to behave abusively, we should not step back from warning the other guy also if he is being needlessly offensive. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 13:54, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mrt, what Mar4d says in the diff is not particularly abusive. And, do note that amongst the slew of admins who haunt these articles, I'm perhaps the least critical of DS! But, on second thoughts, perhaps you're right and I'll drop a note on Mar4d's talk page asking him to strike out some of those remarks. --regentspark (comment) 13:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I've asked him to either strike out the statements or to back them up. --regentspark (comment) 14:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
RP, I will accept your advise on the matter Re Mar, and what of this? I really cannot have him popping up all the time with that accusation. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mrt, you've gone around accusing him of pushing a Pakistani agenda and speculated about his motives as well. I don't know who started all this but let's just end it here and return to normal content stuff. --regentspark (comment) 09:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I, for one, striked it as quickly as possible, he on the other hand refused to do so even when you asked him.
There is no speculation now, I am 100% convinced he is pushing a pro-Pakistani agenda (I called him "Pakistani" to demonstrate an inherent bias in favor of Pakistani POV), with that said, I didn't label him or liken him to an "extremist" or a "fundamentalist". That is taking it too far, I would say.
Of course, I will take a block from you on grounds of incivility any day if you deem it necessary and I am not asking for his block.
I am satisfied with your actions. But kindly keep a close eye on Mar4d's pointy edits. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 13:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are you there? Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 07:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. But busy for the next three hours. What's up? --regentspark (comment) 12:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See for yourself, now they are going gung ho on another article. May want to post a reminder on that talk about ARBIPA as well Darkness Shines (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I am a human too, I can feel slighted too: Mar4d came up to me and said, "Oh shut it please, I have had enough of your constant blabbering every now and then". Guarantee me (asking you since you know the graveness of the abuses more closely than probably any other admin here) that the next time you see me or him abusing or directly insulting the other on any page with the exception of our own talks, you will block that person right there. Assure me. Eternal lenience is not going to cut it with Mar4d. I am telling you again, he is hell-bent on pushing Pakistani agenda. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 06:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I assure you that if either of you make any personal remarks to the other editor, including "shut it" or accusations of bad faith editing, I'll begin issuing escalation blocks on that editor. I'm posting this on your's as well as Mar4d's talk pages as well. --regentspark (comment) 13:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough with me. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 13:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • No "Special" barnstar for me? I gave you a very cuddly kitten man Darkness Shines (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Who knows. I might get around to it one day. Perhaps. Possibly. --regentspark (comment) 22:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, RegentsPark. You have new messages at Dwaipayanc's talk page.
Message added 15:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dwaipayan (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Darkness Shines

RegentsPark,

Darkness Shines has gone too far this time. He first proposes a delete for Ahmed Ziauddin‎, which he doesn't get, then he proposes a merge, which doesn't work, and so he simply deleted it as a redirect. And he knew there was a history of people telling him no and the article should be kept. I demand that this article be restored and will take whatever steps are necessary to see that he is properly taken care of. How do I get this restored? Where is the material? Crtew (talk) 21:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What peculiar questions, you already reverted my redirecting of the article. Which I did according to policy, WP:BLP1E. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I see it is already restored so there's nothing much to do here. I looked at the deletion discussion and a merge is not unreasonable (most comments indicated a preference for merge and the one user - now vanished (what happened?) - who didn't provided references that do somewhat support BLP1E. Regardless of all that, consensus for a merge hasn't actually been determined so, DS, I suggest you take this elsewhere. Absolutely no more redirects or attempts to merge Ahmed Ziauddin anywhere without a clear consensus. I've been studiously trying to avoid commenting on the AN3 diff DS provides in the section above but what the heck. Let's just say that Crtew's comment was neither disruptive nor called for. It would have been better not to have brought up the past in what was an unrelated incident but there is nothing actually wrong with doing so. Make what you will of that but there is nothing actionable anywhere in all of this. --regentspark (comment) 22:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, sorry about this RP but I already nominated it for deletion per ONEEVENT & BLP1E. Merger discussions never get outside input, is there a noticeboard for them? Darkness Shines (talk) 22:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No special forum. But the nomination for deletion is the right way to go about it so no worries. --regentspark (comment) 23:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, BTW Crtew must not have liked your response, he has dragged me to the drama board Darkness Shines (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that. --regentspark (comment) 23:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Nice work on Great Eastern Hotel (Kolkata)--thanks. Drmies (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1500 characters. I didn't count but I'm sure it's long enough. What are you, a DYK virgin? I hope you saw the hook; that was about the most exciting thing I could come up with; feel free to propose something more interesting. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have a couple of DYKs but usually someone else does the dirty work. Like you're doing now :). I'm not organized enough. Will look at the hook but not sure if there is anything more interesting. --regentspark (comment) 23:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, the readable prose is more than 1500. I expanded the lead, to provide some context for the uninitiated reader, and also to summarise the body of the article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--but can you see what's with those parameters in the citations? I've never seen that before. Drmies (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed citations. --regentspark (comment) 03:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

YGM. - Sitush (talk) 23:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! not an RS, I guess, but definitely an interesting story! --regentspark (comment) 23:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Check with Malleus or Drmies. I suspect that the book might just scrape through given the nature of the subject matter. Reliability is relative. - Sitush (talk) 23:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

Merge discussion for Opium Wars

Hi. There has been a reopened discussion ongoing at Talk:First Opium War#Merge discussion to merge the contents of Opium Wars into First Opium War and Second Opium War. A consensus seems to have been reached among all the users who contributed to the lede/Opium Wars#Overview section, and merging may be imminent. You have been identified as a major contributor of the article about to be abolished (see: User:Kiyoweap/Opium Wars) and thus are welcomed to participate in the merge, especially in the sections which you have contributed. Or, any other input under the Merge discussion thread given above would be appreciated. Thanks. --Kiyoweap (talk) 04:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Eastern Hotel (Kolkata)

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

2005 Kashmir earthquake

While commenting here,I have seen the topic of the article have some Indian part too.Then,Is it likely to have WikiprojectIndia as i think.---zeeyanwiki discutez 19:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have the vague idea that the earthquake was centered mainly in Pakistani Kashmir but the article says 1400 deaths in J&K, which is certainly not trivial. So, yes, I agree. --regentspark (comment) 19:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. I should have looked at your linked discussion first! --regentspark (comment) 19:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

You might be interested in a paper which I just heard in draft on the Wiki movement and the Iron Law of Oligarchy. I consider it confirmed, myself. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. If you get a copy, do share it. --regentspark (comment) 13:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

View sought

Considering your views there,[1] your views are sought here.[2] This may be considered canvassing, so perhaps you may share your views here or on my talk page. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I'll pass. No sense in fighting a losing battle :) --regentspark (comment) 13:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean that you'd not have Thatcher's death as a separate article but don't feel it worth the trouble commenting on it as the result is a foregone conclusion? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to look at the Thatcher death article more carefully if I were actually commenting. But, to answer your question, yes. --regentspark (comment) 13:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't suggest you comment there as that would be canvassing, I am happy at the consistency, a rare quality. Thanks. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 14:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Regents Park, please see my response in my talk page to your point. ThanksDipendra2007 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Regents Park, please see my latest point in the Hindi talk page. Best regards. Dipendra2007 (talk) 21:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now the article and category don't match

Hello RegentsPark, The article Azerbaijani people that you archived its discussion on 21 February 2013, now dont match the category with the same name, Category:Azerbaijani people . Please see our discussion on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 April 18#Category:Azerbaijani people. Please solve the confussion and make a disambiguation for the article and the category.

By the way, I suggest you check the definition in Oxford dictionary for Azeri and Azerbaijani. The discussion on 21 February 2013 was based on 'google hits' and as 65.92.180.137 said at the end, the 3,360 hits included both country and ethnicity. But if we move the article to Azeri as Oxford and other sources, the problem will be solved. Anyways please make the category and the article have the same name and disambiguate them please.--Taranet (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taranet. I'm not sure what you want me to do. You could align the categories and make the disambiguation page yourself. If you need some admin help (like deleting something) let me know. Also, note that I have no opinion on Azeri vs. Azerbaijani people but merely closed a move discussion based on the evidence provided. If you think there is new evidence, you can always initiate a new move request. --regentspark (comment) 15:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WT:RFA#Closers will be needed

Just a pointer. - Dank (push to talk) 16:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thx.--regentspark (comment) 17:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Running out of admins

We seem to be in a (temporary) state of running out of admins who have an interest in Indic stuff. Eg: Boing!, Qwyrxian and Blade are all more or less out of action. There is definitely no need for you to get involved in the awkward policy sense but could you please add Udayar (caste) to your watchlist while I try to sort out what is going on - a claim has been made that seems to contradict sources for that article but I need to compare it with sources for the attempted redirect. I don't have time to start a discussion now but will endeavour to do so tomorrow. - Sitush (talk) 23:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

Question

Hey RP, hows tricks? Can you do me a favour please and look at this I am sorely tempted to remove the RFC ID as this is the third time Mckhan has posted (more or less) this same bloody question. I honestly think it an abuse of the RFC process, and can see it putting people off from ever commenting on that pox ridden article. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look later today. Got a meeting to go to! --regentspark (comment) 17:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Commented. Not much I can do but I wouldn't pull the RfC if I were you. --regentspark (comment) 20:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saraiki language

Dear, Saraiki is a language, it is not a dialect. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect,Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi ,Derawali dialect articles. I suggest merging these articles , as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Kindly See these External Links #1 and #2.

  • Department of Saraiki, Islamia University, Bahawalpur was established in 1989[1] and Department of Saraiki, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan[2] was established in 2006. Saraiki is taught as subject in schools and colleges at higher secondary, intermediate and degree level. Allama Iqbal open university Islamabad,[3] and Al-Khair university Bhimbir have their Pakistani Linguistics Departments. They are offering M.Phil. and Ph.D in Saraiki. Five TV channels and Ten Radio Stations are Serving Saraiki language. 182.186.116.104 (talk) 12:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi

FYI: sockpuppet investigation for WarunaNugawela. --Taivo (talk) 03:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commented there. This is quacking so loudly it doesn't really need an SPI but since there is one, I'll let someone else do the block. --regentspark (comment) 11:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification regarding Jerusalem RFC

A request for clarification has been submitted regarding the ArbCom mandated Jerusalem RFC process. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ IUB.
  2. ^ Multan
  3. ^ AIOU
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&oldid=552651327"