ʼOle language
’Ole | |
---|---|
’Olekha, Monkha, Monpa, Ole Mönpa | |
Black Mountain Monpa | |
Region | Bhutan |
Native speakers | 500 (2007)[1] |
Sino-Tibetan
| |
Tibetan script | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | ole |
Glottolog | olek1239 |
ELP | Olekha |
'Ole, also called 'Olekha or Black Mountain Monpa, is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken by about 1,000 people in the Black Mountains of Wangdue Phodrang and Trongsa Districts in western Bhutan. The term 'Ole refers to a clan of speakers.[2]
Locations
According to the Ethnologue, Olekha is spoken in the following locations of Bhutan.
- Trongsa District: 3 enclaves west of Mangde river
- Wangdue Phodrang District: Adha, Jangji, Rukha, Thrumzur, and Wangling villages
Dialects are separated by the Black Mountains.
Varieties
Black Mountain Monpa is spoken in at least 6 villages. The variety spoken in Rukha village, south-central Wangdi is known as ’Olekha.[3] Out of a population of 100-150 people (about 15 households) in Rukha village, there is only one elderly female fluent speaker and two semi-fluent speakers of ’Olekha.[3]
George van Driem (1992)[4] reports a Western dialect (spoken in Rukha and Reti villages) and Eastern dialect (spoken in Cungseng village).
History
'Ole was unknown beyond its immediate area until 1990,[citation needed] and is now highly endangered, and was originally assumed to be East Bodish.[5] George van Driem described 'Ole as a remnant of the primordial population of the Black Mountains before the southward expansion of the ancient East Bodish tribes.[6]
More recently, Gwendolyn Hyslop (2016),[3] agreeing with van Driem, has suggested that 'Ole is an isolated Sino-Tibetan language heavily influenced by East Bodish.[7] Because of its small amount of cognates with East Bodish languages, Blench and Post provisionally treat 'Ole as an isolate.[5]
External relationships
The distantly related Tshangla language of eastern Bhutan, also called "Monpa" and predating Dzongkha, also belongs to the Sino-Tibetan languages.[6][8] Although 'Ole is most closely related to the Bumthang language, both being East Bodish languages, Tshangla and related languages form a sister branch not to the East Bodish group, but to its parent Bodish branch. Thus the ambiguous term "Monpa" risks separating languages that should be grouped together, while grouping languages together that are quite separate.[9]
Gerber (2018)[10] notes that Black Mountain Mönpa has had extensive contact with Gongduk before the arrival of East Bodish languages in Bhutan. The following comparative vocabulary table from Gerber (2018: 13-16) compares Gongduk, Black Mountain Mönpa, and Bjokapakha, which is a divergent Tshangla variety.
Gloss | Gongduk | Black Mountain Mönpa | Bjokapakha |
---|---|---|---|
hair (on head) | θɤm | guluŋ | tsham |
tongue | dəli | ’liː | lɪ |
eye | mik | mek ~ mik | miŋ |
ear | nərəŋ | naktaŋ | nabali |
tooth | ɤn | ’aː ~ waː | sha |
bone | rukɤŋ | ɦɤtphok ~ yöphok | khaŋ- |
blood | winiʔ | kɔk | yi |
hand/arm | gur | lɤk ~ lok | gadaŋ |
leg/foot | bidɤʔ | dɤkpɛŋ ~ tɛ̤kɛŋ | bitiŋ |
faeces | ki | cok | khɨ |
water | dɤŋli | cö, khe | ri |
rain | wɤ | ghö | ŋamtsu |
dog | oki | cüla ~ khula | khu |
pig | don | pɔk | phakpa |
fish | kuŋwə | nye̤ | ŋa |
louse | dɤr | θæːk | shiŋ |
bear | bekpələ | wɤm ~ wom | omsha |
son | ledə | bæθaː | za |
house | kiŋ | mhiː̤ ~ mhe̤ː | phai |
fire | mi | ’aːmik ~ ’aːmit | mɨ |
to hear | lə yu- | goː- | nai tha |
to see | tɤŋ- | tuŋ- | thoŋ- |
to look | məl- ~ mɤt- | mak- | gotto |
to sit | mi- ~ mu- | buŋ- ~ bæŋ- | laŋ- |
to die | komθ- | θɛː- ~ θɛʔ- | shi- |
to kill | tɤt- | θüt- ~ θut- ~ θit- | she- |
1sg pronoun | ðə | kö | jaŋ |
2sg pronoun | gi | iŋ | nan |
3sg pronoun | gon | hoʔma (mas.); hoʔmet (fem.) | dan |
1pl pronoun | ðiŋ | ɔŋdat (incl.); anak (excl.) | ai |
2pl pronoun | giŋ | iŋnak | nai |
3pl pronoun | gonmə | hoʔoŋ | dai |
Vocabulary
Hyslop (2016)[3] notes that Olekha has borrowed heavily from East Bodish and Tibetic languages, but also has a layer of native vocabulary items. Numerals are mostly borrowed from East Bodish languages, while body parts and nature words are borrowed from both Tibetic and East Bodish languages. Hyslop (2016) lists the following Olekha words of clearly indigenous (non-borrowed) origin.
- six: wok
- head: peː
- face: ék
- rain: gø
- earth: tʰabak
- ash: tʰækʰu
- stone: loŋ
- fire: ámik
- grandfather: tana
- grandmother: ʔɐˈpeŋ
- chicken: ˈkɤgɤ
- mustard: pekoŋ
- cotton: ʔɐˈpʰɪt
- eggplant: ˈpandala
- foxtail millet: ʔamet
The pronouns and lexical items for all foraged plants are also of indigenous origin. Additionally, the central vowel /ɤ/ and voiced uvular fricative /ʁ/ are only found in non-borrowed words.[3]
Words whose origin is not certain (i.e., may or may not be borrowed) are:[3]
- nose: ná (perhaps borrowed from East Bodish?)
- arm: lok (perhaps borrowed from Tibetic?)
- wind: lǿ
- water: cø
- mother: ʔɔmɔ
- father: ʔɔpɔ
- dog: tʃylɔ
- sheep: lu
- barley: nápʰa
- bitter buckwheat: máma
References
- ^ ’Ole at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
- ^ van Driem, George (July 1992). "In Quest of Mahākirānti" (PDF). Center of Nepal and Asian Studies Journal. 19 (2): 241–247. Retrieved 23 October 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f Gwendolyn Hyslop. 2016. Worlds of knowledge in Central Bhutan: Documentation of 'Olekha. Language Documentation & Conservation 10. 77-106.
- ^ van Driem, George. 1992. The Monpa language of the Black Mountains. Presented at ICSTLL 25.
- ^ a b Blench, R. & Post, M. W. (2013). Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of Northeast Indian languages
- ^ a b van Driem, George L. (1993). "Language Policy in Bhutan". London: SOAS, University of London. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 November 2010. Retrieved 2011-01-18.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ van Driem, George L. (2011). "Tibeto-Burman subgroups and historical grammar". Himalayan Linguistics Journal. 10 (1): 31–39. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ van Driem, George (2001). Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Brill. pp. 915 et seq.
- ^ Andvik, Erik E. (2010). A Grammar of Tshangla. Tibetan Studies Library. Vol. 10. Brill Publishers. pp. 4–7. ISBN 9004178279.
- ^ Gerber, Pascal. 2018. Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology. Unpublished draft.
Further reading
- Namgyel, Singye. The Language Web of Bhutan. Thimphu: KMT.
- van Driem, George L; Karma Tshering of Gaselô (collab) (1998). Dzongkha. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. ISBN 905789002X.
- van Driem, George (2001). Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region: Containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language. Brill. ISBN 9004120629.
- van Driem, George (2007). "Endangered Languages of Bhutan and Sikkim: East Bodish Languages". In Moseley, Christopher (ed.). Encyclopedia of the World's Endangered Languages. Routledge. p. 295. ISBN 070071197X.