2016 Italian constitutional referendum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2016 Italian constitutional referendum

4 December 2016

Do you approve the text of the Constitutional Law concerning 'Provisions for overcoming equal bicameralism, reducing the number of Members of Parliament, limiting the operating costs of the institutions, the suppression of the CNEL and the revision of Title V of Part II of the Constitution' approved by Parliament and published in the Official Gazette no. 88 of 15 April 2016?
Votes %
Yes 13,431,087 40.88%
No 19,421,025 59.12%
Valid votes 32,852,112 98.82%
Invalid or blank votes 392,146 1.18%
Total votes 33,244,258 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 50,773,284 65.48%

Result by province

A constitutional referendum was held in Italy on 4 December 2016.[1] Voters were asked whether they approved a constitutional law that amends the Italian Constitution to reform the composition and powers of the Parliament of Italy,[2] as well as the division of powers between the State, the regions, and administrative entities.

The bill, put forward by the then Prime Minister of Italy, Matteo Renzi, and his centre-left Democratic Party, was first introduced by the government in the Senate on 8 April 2014. After several amendments were made to the proposed law by both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, the bill received its first approval on 13 October 2015 (Senate) and 11 January 2016 (Chamber), and, eventually, its second and final approval on 20 January 2016 (Senate) and 12 April 2016 (Chamber).[3]

In accordance with Article 138 of the Constitution, a referendum was called after the formal request of more than one fifth of the members of both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies,[4] since the constitutional law had not been approved by a qualified majority of two-thirds in each house of parliament in the second vote.[5] 59.11% of voters voted against the constitutional reform, meaning it did not come into effect.[6] This was the third constitutional referendum in the history of the Italian Republic; the other two were in 2001 (in which the amending law was approved) and in 2006 (in which it was rejected).

Had the voters approved the constitutional law, it would have achieved the most extensive constitutional reform in Italy since the end of the monarchy, not only influencing the organization of the Parliament, but also improving, according to its proponents, on the poor government stability of the country. Opposition parties and well-known jurists (such as Gustavo Zagrebelsky[7] and Stefano Rodotà[8]) harshly criticised the bill, claiming that it was poorly written and would have made the government too powerful.[9][10]

Following the clear victory of the "No" vote, Renzi tendered his resignation as Prime Minister.[11] Paolo Gentiloni was selected as his replacement on 11 December.[12]

Constitutional background[edit]

Palazzo Madama, the meeting place of the Italian Senate.

The Italian Parliament is described as a perfectly symmetric bicameral legislature, in that it has a lower house (the Chamber of Deputies) and an upper house (the Senate of the Republic) with the following characteristics:

  • The two houses are elected simultaneously and for the same five-year term.
  • The Government must have each house's confidence, and is responsible to both of them.
  • All legislation must be passed in the same text by both houses: whenever a bill is amended by either house, it must be sent to the other one in a process known as the navetta parlamentare (parliamentary shuttle).

Political background[edit]

The first concrete attempts at reforming the Senate took place in the 1980s, when the first bicameral committee for constitutional reform headed by Aldo Bozzi was created (1983).[13] A second bicameral committee (headed by Ciriaco De Mita, later replaced by Nilde Iotti) operated in 1992–1994,[14] followed in 1997 by the third committee headed by the leader of the Left Democrats, Massimo D'Alema.[15] These attempts were unsuccessful.

A reform bill proposed by Silvio Berlusconi's government was finally approved by the parliament in 2005.[16] This proposal, which would also have considerably strengthened the powers of the prime minister, at the same time weakening the role of the President,[17] was ultimately rejected in the 2006 referendum.

In 2011, with the financial crisis ensuing and Berlusconi forced to resign from the position of Prime Minister,[18] the Parliament reprised discussions on constitutional reforms at the urging of president Giorgio Napolitano.[19] However, strong disagreements between the two main parties (the People of Freedom and the Democratic Party) prevented the Parliament from deciding on a reform.

Matteo Renzi in 2015.

After the 2013 general election, constitutional reform remained a prominent political topic. However, the first real breakthrough occurred when Matteo Renzi, the new Secretary of the Democratic Party, was appointed Prime Minister in February 2014. As part of his government's program, Renzi pledged to implement a number of reforms, including the abolition of the perfectly symmetric bicameralism, with a substantial decrease in the membership and power of the Senate. As well as effectively abolishing the current Senate, the package also included a new electoral law, aimed at giving the party that won the most votes in elections for the Chamber of Deputies a great many additional seats, allowing the formation of a stronger government.

After the proposals passed both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate twice, as required by Article 138 of the Italian constitution, Renzi scheduled a referendum to secure the Italian people's endorsement for October and also indicated that he would resign if his reforms were rejected.[20] Some opposition parties, predominantly Five Star Movement, Lega Nord and Italian Left, and also some newspapers like Il Fatto Quotidiano and Il manifesto, accused Renzi of turning the referendum into a plebiscite on his premiership with those comments.[21] However, after some months, Renzi said that his government will continue until the end of the legislature.

On 15 January 2016, La Repubblica reported that Renzi had hired American political adviser Jim Messina – who had worked with Barack Obama[22] and David Cameron[22] and would later work for Mariano Rajoy[23] – to oversee the campaign for "Yes".[24]

Details of the proposed change[edit]

Role and powers of the Senate[edit]

The Senate represents territorial institutions. It shares the legislative power with the Chamber of Deputies, but the vote of the Senate is only required to enact laws regarding specific matters. For all other laws, the vote of the Senate is optional and can be overruled by a second vote of the Chamber of Deputies.[25]

Senators enjoy the same immunities as the deputies, but receive no remuneration.[26]

The Government does not need to have the confidence of the new Senate, and the Senate cannot pass a motion of no confidence against the Government.[27]

Composition of the Senate[edit]

  • 95 senators are elected by the Regional Councils and by the Councils of the autonomous provinces of Trento and Bozen. In each region and autonomous province, one senator (21 in total) must be elected from among the mayors of the respective territories; the remaining 74 senators must be elected from among the members of the Councils themselves.[28]
  • 5 senators are appointed by the President of the Republic for a seven-year term.[29]
  • Former Presidents of the Republic are senators for life.[30]

The Senate is not subject to dissolution; instead, when a Regional Council ends its five years term, so do the senators elected by it; new senators will be elected after the Regional Council is renewed.[28]

Apportionment of seats among regions[edit]

Region Seats Region Seats Region Seats
Abruzzo 2 Friuli-Venezia Giulia 2 Sardinia 3
Aosta Valley 2 Lazio 8 Sicily 7
Apulia 6 Liguria 2 South Tyrol[a] 2
Basilicata 2 Lombardy 14 Trentino[a] 2
Calabria 3 Marche 2 Tuscany 5
Campania 9 Molise 2 Umbria 2
Emilia-Romagna 6 Piedmont 7 Veneto 7


a Autonomous province, part of the region of Trentino-South Tyrol.

Legislative procedure[edit]

The reform differentiates between two main legislative procedures: a unicameral procedure (in which the role of the Senate is mostly consultative) and a bicameral procedure (in which a bill must be approved by both Chambers).[33][34]

Under the unicameral procedure (which is used every time the Constitution does not require a special procedure), bills can be adopted by a vote of the Chamber of Deputies. At that point, the approved bill is sent to the Senate, which has 10 days to decide whether to examine it to propose changes, or let it be enacted without modification. If one-third of the senators ask to review the bill, the Senate has 30 days to formulate amendments and send the bill back to the Chamber of Deputies. Then the deputies will take the final decision on the Senate's proposals and on the bill as a whole. No further approval of the Senate is needed, but a qualified majority might be required to overcome the Senate's veto for laws adopted under the supremacy clause.

The bicameral procedure works in a similar way to the current legislative procedure, in that bills must be approved in the same text by both houses to be enacted, and will be forwarded from one house to the other until approved by both. This procedure is required for bills regarding the following.

  • territorial subdivisions of Italy (regions, municipalities, metropolitan cities, and the special municipality of Rome)
  • participation of Italy in the European Union (e.g. ratification of EU treaties)
  • the Senate itself (e.g. its electoral law)
  • protection of linguistic minorities
  • referendums and other forms of popular consultation

Opponents to the referendum argue that the legislative procedures under the reformed Constitution would be much more than two, because of the several articles that introduce exceptions.[35][36]

State and regional competence[edit]

The reform draws a different partition of matters reserved to the State and to the regions. The so-called "concurrent competence", according to which State law legislates the principles that are later to be implemented by regional laws, is abolished. All concurrent matters are reassigned to either the State's or the regions' competence.[37]

The Government can propose legislation to the Parliament on matters that are not reserved to the State, when this is required to protect the juridical or economic unity of Italy, or to protect national interests.[37] Such laws are adopted according to the unicameral legislative procedure: however, when modifications are proposed by an absolute majority of the members of the Senate, the Chamber of Deputies can override the proposals only by voting against them with an absolute majority of its members.[33]

CNEL and provinces[edit]

The National Council for Economics and Labour[38] (CNEL), which is a consultative assembly of experts of the economic, social, and legal fields, representatives of public and private-sector producers of goods and services, and representatives of social service and voluntary organisations, is abolished.[39]

Provinces (the second-level administrative divisions of Italy) are removed from the Constitution, except for the autonomous provinces of Bolzano and Trento.[40] This opens the door for ordinary laws to abolish or radically reform them. In 2014–15 fourteen provinces were already replaced by "metropolitan cities" (that still exist in the reformed Constitution).

Other changes[edit]

  • The majority required to elect the President is increased to three fifths of the members of the Parliament in joint session after the third round of balloting, and changed to three fifths of votes after the sixth round. (The pre-reform Constitution mandates an absolute majority of the members of Parliament after the third round of balloting.)[41]
  • Two judges of the Constitutional Court are elected by the Senate, three by the Chamber of Deputies. (In the pre-reform Constitution, the Parliament in joint session elects five judges.)[42]
  • The initiative of 150,000 voters is required to propose new legislation. Once the text is received, the Parliament will be obliged to discuss it. (The pre-reform Constitution requires only 50,000 signatures to propose a bill but it doesn't require the Parliament to discuss it.)[43]
  • When a referendum is requested by more than 800,000 voters, up from 500,000 in the pre-reform constitution, it only requires a reduced turnout to be valid (more than half of the turnout registered in the last general election, down from the absolute majority of the electorate in the pre-reform Constitution).[44]
  • Electoral laws are subject to a preemptive constitutional review by the Constitutional Court, as an additional guarantee for parliamentary minorities.[45]
  • A state of war can be declared by the Chamber of Deputies only (instead of requiring the approval of both houses as in the pre-reform Constitution); however, it must be approved by an absolute majority of its members (currently, a simple majority vote is sufficient).[46]

Reactions and criticism[edit]

Books about the 2016 constitutional referendum.

Prime Minister Renzi was accused by some law scholars and politicians, such as Stefano Rodotà and Fausto Bertinotti, of being authoritarian and anti-democratic for proposing this reform.[47][48][49][50][51] Others, like Gianfranco Pasquino, argue that the adopted text is badly written.[52][53]

In April 2016, a paper called "Appello dei costituzionalisti" ("A Plea from Constitutional Scholars") was written by 56 law scholars (mainly constitutional law scholars), showing criticism of the proposed reform and their numerous concerns: among them are Francesco Amirante, Paolo Caretti, Lorenza Carlassare, Ugo De Siervo, Giovanni Maria Flick, Paolo Maddalena, Valerio Onida, Alfonso Quaranta and Gustavo Zagrebelsky.[54] The main points of criticism the paper raises are the following:

  • The reform was approved by Prime Minister Renzi's coalition, without reaching a consensus among a plurality of the political parties in the Parliament. (The Constitution of Italy was adopted and has been traditionally amended by consensus.)
  • The reformed Senate does not adequately represent the interests of the regions because of its weakened powers and the method of appointment of the senators (which favors the representation of political parties, rather than representatives of local interests). The number of senators has been changed without accounting for their role in electing independent organs, such as the President of Italy and part of the Constitutional Court.
  • The many legislative procedures (the paper identifies three) bring risks of uncertainties and conflicts.
  • Ordinary regions are rendered almost powerless under the new Constitution (while the five regions with special autonomy are left unchanged). The lack of coherent legislation to regulate the partition of competence between the State and regions and the lack of effective cooperation between the various constituent entities are not addressed. The reform abolishes concurrent competence between State and regions on one hand, but on the other it limits many areas of exclusive competence for the State to "general and common dispositions" only (which was defined as "concurrent competence" in the pre-reform Constitution).
  • The reform aims at lowering the costs of public institutions, but it does so while weakening democratic representation: the number of senators is reduced to less than one-sixth of that of members of the Chamber of Deputies; provinces are abolished even in the most densely populated areas; metropolitan cities are bolstered instead of rationalizing the constituent entities (Italian comuni differ dramatically in size and population); CNEL is abolished without introducing a substitute for the debate between political institutions and representatives of the Italian society.

Later, in May 2016, other 184 law scholars and professors of various disciplines (among whom Franco Bassanini, Massimo Bordignon, Stefano Ceccanti, Francesco Clementi, Carlo Fusaro, Claudia Mancina, Stefano Mannoni, Angelo Panebianco, Pasquale Pasquino, Francesco Pizzetti, Michele Salvati, Tiziano Treu) signed, instead, an appeal in favour of the constitutional reform.[55]

Campaign positions[edit]


Choice Logo Campaign Slogan Website
checkY Yes Just a Yes Basta un Sì www.bastaunsi.it
☒N No Committee for No Comitato per il No www.comitatoperilno.it
I Vote No Io Voto No www.iovotono.it

Main political parties[edit]

Choice Parties Political orientation Leader Ref
checkY Yes Democratic Party (PD) Social democracy Matteo Renzi [56]
New Centre-Right (NCD) Conservatism Angelino Alfano [57]
Liberal Popular Alliance (ALA) Centrism Denis Verdini [58]
Civic Choice (SC) Liberalism Enrico Zanetti [59][60]
☒N No Five Star Movement (M5S) Populism Beppe Grillo [61]
Forza Italia (FI) Liberal conservatism Silvio Berlusconi [62]
Italian Left (SI) Democratic socialism Nicola Fratoianni [63]
Lega Nord (LN) Right-wing populism Matteo Salvini [64]
Brothers of Italy (FdI) National conservatism Giorgia Meloni [65]
Conservatives and Reformists (CR) Conservatism Raffaele Fitto [66]

European political parties[edit]

Choice Parties Political orientation Leader Ref
checkY Yes Party of European Socialists (PES) Social democracy Sergei Stanishev [67]
☒N No Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM 25) Alter-Europeanism Yanis Varoufakis [68]

Trade unions and business organisations[edit]

Choice Organisations Political and cultural orientation Secretaries
checkY Yes General Confederation of Italian Industry (Confindustria)[69] Employers and businesses' organisation Vincenzo Boccia
Italian Confederation of Workers' Trade Unions (CISL) Centrism Anna Maria Furlan
☒N No Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL)[70] Democratic socialism Susanna Camusso
☒N No General Labour Union (UGL)[71] National syndicalism Francesco Paolo Capone
Neutral/Undeclared Italian Labour Union (UIL)[72] Social democracy Carmelo Barbagallo


Choice Newspapers Political and cultural orientation
checkY Yes L'Unità[73] Social democracy[74]
Il Sole 24 Ore Business newspaper
Il Foglio[75] Liberal conservatism
☒N No Il Fatto Quotidiano[76] Anti-establishment, Populism
Il Giornale[77] Conservatism[78]
Libero[79] Liberal conservatism
Il manifesto[80] Communism
Neutral/Undeclared La Repubblica Social liberalism
Corriere della Sera Centrism
La Stampa Centrism


Choice Periodicals Political and cultural orientation
checkY Yes La Civiltà Cattolica[81][82] Periodical published by the Society of Jesus
Mondoperaio[83] Monthly journal, official organ of the Italian Socialist Party

Other organisations[edit]

Choice Organisations Political and cultural orientation Leaders
checkY Yes Christian Associations of Italian Workers (ACLI)[84] Catholic social teaching, Christian left Roberto Rossini
☒N No National Association of the Italian Partisans (ANPI)[85] Anti-fascism Carlo Smuraglia
Neutral Libera[86] Anti-mafia Luigi Ciotti

TV debates[edit]

Date Channel Programme Moderator Participants Audience Notes
checkY YES ☒N NO Audience Share
16 September La7 Sì o No Enrico Mentana Roberto Giachetti Massimo D'Alema 792,000 3.4% [87][88]
23 September Gian Luca Galletti,
Dario Nardella
Renato Brunetta,
Giuseppe Civati
574,000 2.7% [89]
30 September Matteo Renzi Gustavo Zagrebelsky 1,747,000 8.0% [90][91]
14 October Luciano Violante Tomaso Montanari 626,000 3.8% [92]
23 September La7 Otto e Mezzo Lilli Gruber Matteo Renzi Marco Travaglio 2,280,000 9.4% [93]
7 October Maria Elena Boschi Matteo Salvini 2,000,000 8.4% [94]
28 October La7 Sì o No Enrico Mentana Matteo Renzi Ciriaco De Mita 825,000 10.8%
4 November Stefano Ceccanti
Anna Ascani
Elisabetta Piccolotti
Anna Falcone
603,000 3.5%

Opinion polls[edit]


Ballot used in the referendum

"Almost 19,500,000 voters rejected the reform (59.11%), while nearly 13,500,000 voters approved it (40.88%). The turnout (65.47%) was by far the highest compared to Italy's other constitutional referendums: in 2001, the voter turnout was extremely low (34.10%); in 2006 it was higher, but barely exceeded half of the total number of eligible voters (52.46%)".[95]

Choice Votes %
checkY Yes 13,432,208 40.89
☒N No 19,419,507 59.11
Invalid/blank votes 392,130
Total 33,243,845 100
Registered voters/turnout 50,773,284 65.47
Ministry of the Interior Archived 4 December 2016 at archive.today
Popular vote
☒N No
checkY Yes

By region[edit]

Sardinia and South Tyrol, both constituent entities of the Italian Republic with special conditions of autonomy, reported overall the highest percentage[96] of No[97][98] and Yes[99] votes respectively.

Region checkY Yes ☒N No Electorate Turnout
Votes % Votes %
Abruzzo 255,022 35.6 461,167 64.4 1,052,049 68.7
Aosta Valley 30,568 43.2 40,116 56.8 99,735 71.9
Apulia 659,354 32.8 1,348,573 67.2 3,280,745 61.7
Basilicata 98,924 34.1 191,081 65.9 467,000 62.9
Calabria 276,384 33.0 561,557 67.0 1,553,741 54.4
Campania 839,692 31.5 1,827,768 68.5 4,566,905 58.9
Emilia-Romagna 1,262,484 50.4 1,242,992 49.6 3,326,910 75.9
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 267,379 39.0 417,732 61.0 952,493 72.5
Lazio 1,108,768 36.7 1,914,397 63.3 4,402,145 69.2
Liguria 342,671 39.9 515,777 60.1 1,241,618 69.7
Lombardy 2,453,095 44.5 3,058,051 55.5 7,480,375 74.2
Marche 385,877 45.0 472,656 55.0 1,189,180 72.8
Molise 63,695 39.2 98,728 60.8 256,600 63.9
Piedmont 1,055,043 43.5 1,368,507 56.5 3,396,378 72.0
Sardinia 237,280 27.8 616,791 72.2 1,375,845 62.5
Sicily 642,980 28.4 1,619,828 71.6 4,031,871 56.7
Trentino-South Tyrol 305,473 53.9 261,473 46.1 792,503 72.2
Tuscany 1,105,769 52.5 1,000,008 47.5 2,854,162 74.4
Umbria 240,346 48.8 251,908 51.2 675,610 73.5
Veneto 1,078,883 38.1 1,756,144 61.9 3,725,399 76.7
Italy 12,709,515 40.0 19,025,275 60.0 46,720,943 68.5

Italians abroad[edit]

Constituency checkY Yes ☒N No Invalid/blank Electorate Turnout
Votes % Votes % Votes %
  Europe 415,068 62.4 249,876 37.6 65,031 8.9 2,166,037 33.7
  South America 207,144 71.9 80,831 28.1 40,275 12.2 1,291,065 25.4
  North and Central Americas 62,816 62.2 38,113 37.8 15,979 13.6 374,987 31.2
  Africa, Asia, Oceania, Antarctica 37,644 59.7 25,433 40.3 7,201 10.2 220,252 31.9
  World 722,672 64.7 394,253 35.3 122,486 10.3 4,052,341 30.7
Votes of Italians abroad by country[100]


Renzi resigns after the referendum result.

After the first exit polls, Prime Minister Matteo Renzi stated in a midnight press conference that he would resign the next day.[101][102] In his speech, Renzi assumed full responsibility for the referendum defeat.[101]

The President of the Italian Republic Sergio Mattarella asked Matteo Renzi to briefly postpone his resignation, in order to complete the parliamentary approval of the next year's budget law. After the budget was passed on 7 December, Renzi resigned that night.[103]

Financial markets were not particularly affected by the defeat of the constitutional reform: the Milan stock exchange closed the Monday session relatively stable (−0.2% on respect of previous Friday closing, before the vote),[104] while on Tuesday 6 December the stock index jumped at +4.15% (best result since 11 March 2016).[105]

In order to assure Italy stability, on 11 December 2016 President Sergio Mattarella gave Paolo Gentiloni the task of constituting a new government.[106]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Italiani al voto per il referendum costituzionale". Ministero dell'interno. 18 November 2016.
  2. ^ "Scheda / La nuova Costituzione e il nuovo Senato (versione solo testo)". 12 October 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  3. ^ "Camera.it – XVII Legislatura – Lavori – Progetti di legge – Scheda del progetto di legge". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  4. ^ "Referendum riforme, depositate le firme di maggioranza e opposizione". Retrieved 27 March 2017.
  5. ^ "Constitution of the Italian Republic" (PDF). Senate of the Republic. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  6. ^ "Referendum [Scrutini] (In complesso) – Referendum costituzionale del 4 dicembre 2016 – Ministero dell'Interno". Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  7. ^ "Zagrebelsky spiega i 15 motivi per dire no alla riforma voluta da Renzi". 6 March 2016.
  8. ^ "Stefano Rodotà on the referendum: "the Reform of embarrassing for inadequacy of content and language,"". www.bitfeed.co. Archived from the original on 17 October 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2017.
  9. ^ "Riforme, al Senato scontro tra maggioranza e opposizione per l'emendamento 'canguro'". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  10. ^ "The Renzi referendum – The Florentine". 7 September 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  11. ^ @lex_sala (12 April 2016). "Referendum costituzionale 2016 Il No al 60%, la riforma non passa Renzi: «Ho perso io, mi dimetto". Corriere.it. Retrieved 5 December 2016.
  12. ^ "Paolo Gentiloni, Italian foreign minister, appointed PM". BBC News. 11 December 2016.
  13. ^ "Le riforme istituzionali – Schede di sintesi". Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  14. ^ "Le riforme istituzionali – Schede di sintesi". Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  15. ^ "CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 24 January 1997, n. 1 (1): Establishment of a Parliamentary Commission for Constitutional Reforms". Chamber of Deputies. Italy.
  16. ^ "Gazzetta Ufficiale". Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  17. ^ "L'altra riforma della Costituzione". 26 June 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  18. ^ "Italy crisis: Silvio Berlusconi resigns as PM". BBC News. 13 November 2011. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  19. ^ "Storia e storie della riforma costituzionale". 22 October 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  20. ^ "Renzi: Referendum?Se perdo vado a casa". Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  21. ^ "Riforme, Sinistra italiana: "Renzi vuole trasformare il referendum in un plebiscito su di sé"". 11 January 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  22. ^ a b Jacobs, Ben (8 May 2015). "Does David Cameron's win mean Jim Messina is better than David Axelrod?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
  23. ^ "May Hires Jim Messina for U.K. Conservative Election Team". Bloomberg.com. 24 April 2017. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
  24. ^ "Renzi assume Jim Messina per risolvere i problemi del Pd (come consigliato dal Foglio mesi fa)". Archived from the original on 12 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  25. ^ Article 55 of the reformed Constitution
  26. ^ Article 69 of the reformed Constitution
  27. ^ Article 94 of the reformed Constitution
  28. ^ a b Article 57 of the reformed Constitution
  29. ^ Article 59 of the reformed Constitution
  30. ^ Article 59 of the Constitution, unchanged
  31. ^ "Riforme, la distribuzione dei senatori per Regione". rainews.
  32. ^ "Referendum: La carica dei 100, i nuovi senatori regione per regione – Referendum". 12 October 2015.
  33. ^ a b Article 70 of the reformed Constitution
  34. ^ "Riforma costituzionale: il procedimento legislativo dal singolare al plurale". Altalex. 27 September 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  35. ^ "Riforma costituzionale. Ferrajoli: "Un monocameralismo imperfetto per una perfetta autocrazia"". Il Cambiamento.
  36. ^ "Referendum riforme, il libro che spiega "Perché No" al Senato dei nominati-immuni". Il Fatto Quotidiano.
  37. ^ a b Article 117 of the reformed Constitution
  38. ^ Consiglio nazionale dell'economia e del lavoro (9 August 2016). "Acts and Regulations". Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 9 August 2016.
  39. ^ Article 99 is abolished
  40. ^ Article 114 of the reformed Constitution
  41. ^ Compare Article 83 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  42. ^ Compare Article 135 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  43. ^ Compare Article 71 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  44. ^ Compare Article 75 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  45. ^ Article 73 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  46. ^ Compare Article 78 of the Constitution, before and after the reform
  47. ^ "Riforme". Il Fatto Quotidiano.
  48. ^ "Renzi progetta un premierato forte e già lo pratica". L'Huffington Post. 26 March 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  49. ^ Silvia Truzzi (17 July 2014). "Riforme, Rodotà: "Avremo un governo padrone del sistema costituzionale" – Il Fatto Quotidiano". Il Fatto Quotidiano. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  50. ^ "Bertinotti: "L'ordine nuovo di Renzi. Autoritario, non di sinistra"". Eddyburg.it. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  51. ^ "Bertinotti: "Con Renzi la sinistra non esiste più..."". 13 March 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  52. ^ Gianfranco Pasquino, "Cittadini senza scettro. Le riforme sbagliate", reviewed by Sabino Cassese, "Le riforme e lo spezzatino", in Sole 24 ore, DICEMBRE 28, 2015.
  53. ^ (in Italian) Giampiero Buonomo, La transizione infinita Mondoperaio, n. 2/2016, pp. 88–90.
  54. ^ "SULLA RIFORMA COSTITUZIONALE". 24 April 2016.
  55. ^ "Le ragioni del Sì" (PDF). corriere.it. Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  56. ^ "Pd, Renzi lancia la campagna sul referendum costituzionale: "Deve essere battaglia unitaria"". La Repubblica (in Italian). 3 August 2016.
  57. ^ "Lupi: Sosterremo lavoro fatto, dicendo sì al referendum – Intervista a Libero" (in Italian). nuovocentrodestra.it. 22 June 2016. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
  58. ^ "Referendum, Verdini: "Fonderemo i comitati del sì, abbiamo partecipato e scritto queste riforme"". Il Fatto Quotidiano (in Italian). 31 July 2016.
  59. ^ "Renzi: stabilità a rischio se vince il no". Il Sole 24 Ore (in Italian). 3 August 2016.
  60. ^ "Riforma costituzionale, Enrico Zanetti: "Troppo importante per il Paese per concedersi il lusso di giocarci sopra una partita a poker"" (in Italian). sceltacivica.it. 23 June 2016. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
  61. ^ "Emma Bonino voterà sì al referendum, senza entusiasmo". Il Post (in Italian). 2 November 2016.
  62. ^ "Referendum costituzionale, lʼallarme di Berlusconi: "Se passa la riforma entriamo in un regime"". TgCom24 (in Italian). 8 May 2016.
  63. ^ "Sinistra Italiana: Noi diciamo No. Questa riforma stravolge la Carta" (in Italian). sinistraitaliana.si. 4 August 2016.
  64. ^ "Referendum, al via il comitato per il "No": FI, Lega e FdI insieme". Il Secolo d'Italia (in Italian). 18 May 2016.
  65. ^ "Referendum, Meloni: "NO, grazie" a riforma Renzi che non abolisce il Senato ma le elezioni dei senatori" (in Italian). fratelli-italia.it. 8 August 2016.
  66. ^ "REFERENDUM, BONFRISCO: VOTEREMO,NO,RIFORMA NON UTILE ITALIANI" (in Italian). gruppocor.it. 6 July 2016. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017.
  67. ^ "PES DECLARES SUPPORT TO THE ITALIAN REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN "BASTA UN SÍ"". PES.eu. 14 October 2016. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  68. ^ "El "No" europeo al referéndum constitucional de Italia". Diem25 – Democracy in Europe Movement 2025. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  69. ^ "Confindustria, l'Italia è ripartita ma la ripresa non c'è". 26 May 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  70. ^ "Ordine del giorno su referendum costituzionale approvato dall'assemblea generale Cgil. – CGIL". 8 September 2016. Archived from the original on 11 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  71. ^ Amm, Ugl (18 November 2016). "Ugl - Referendum, Capone: "Sostegno convinto al NO, riforma incide negativamente su lavoratori e cittadini"". Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  72. ^ "Carmelo BARBAGALLO: comunicato Stampa del 07/10/2016 Condividi su Twitter Condividi su Facebook! Barbagallo: Evitare le tifoserie per il si e per il no. Decidere con coscienza e conoscenza". uil.it. 7 September 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  73. ^ "Perché il referendum non è un plebiscito ma nemmeno un appuntamento neutro". Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  74. ^ Official newspaper of the Democratic Party
  75. ^ Claudio Cerasa (3 May 2016). "Che ci fa Berlusconi con Travaglio?". Il Foglio (in Italian). ilfoglio.it. Archived from the original on 6 May 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
  76. ^ "Referendum, costituzione repubblicana o "principato" renziano?". 12 January 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  77. ^ "Riforme, ddl approvato alla Camera. Comitato per il No al referendum scalda i motori". 11 January 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  78. ^ Owned by Silvio Berlusconi's brother
  79. ^ "Il sondaggio che manda a casa Renzi. Prepari la valigia: ecco i numeri". Archived from the original on 12 November 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  80. ^ "Il Referendum plebiscito". 29 December 2015. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  81. ^ Francesco Occhetta (May 2016). "La riforma della Costituzione" (PDF). La Civiltà Cattolica (in Italian). stefanoceccanti.wordpress.com.
  82. ^ "Gesuiti promuovono riforme: auspicabile vittoria sì a referendum. Una bocciatura provocherebbe blocco Paese e apertura nuovi conflitti". Askanews (in Italian). stefanoceccanti.wordpress.com. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 12 October 2016. Retrieved 12 May 2016.
  83. ^ "Perché votare a favore della riforma costituzionale". Mondoperaio (in Italian). mondoperaio.net. 20 May 2016. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
  84. ^ "Referendum, il video della conferenza stampa". ACLI (in Italian). www.acli.it. 19 October 2016. Archived from the original on 20 October 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  85. ^ "Accordo Anpi-Arci per il no alla riforma del senato e per emendare la legge elettorale". ANPI (in Italian). www.anpi.it. 9 May 2016.
  86. ^ "In merito ad alcune notizie e... – Libera Contro le Mafie". Libera (in Italian). www.facebook.com. 14 October 2016.
  87. ^ "Speciale TgLa7 Referendum/ Anticipazioni e diretta streaming: in studio Giachetti e D'Alema". ilsussidiario.net. 16 September 2016.
  88. ^ Mattia Buonocore (17 September 2016). "Ascolti TV". DavideMaggio.it.
  89. ^ Mattia Buonocore (24 September 2016). "Ascolti TV". DavideMaggio.it.
  90. ^ "Enrico Mentana pronto a moderare venerdì il duello televisivo tra Matteo Renzi e Gustavo Zagrebelsky sul referendum". L'Huffington Post. 27 September 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  91. ^ "ASCOLTI TV VENERDI. TALE E QUALE (21.8%) SURCLASSA SQUADRA ANTIMAFIA (13.7%). BOOM SPECIALE REFERENDUM CON RENZI (8%)". davidemaggio.it. 1 October 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  92. ^ "Venerdi 14 Ottobre 2016. IN 5,1 MLN per TALE e QUALE (23.3%), SQUADRA ANTIMAFIA AL 13.7%". Davidemaggio.it. ASCOLTI TV. 15 October 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  93. ^ "Ascolti tv, record per Otto e mezzo con Renzi e Travaglio: 2 milioni di spettatori, 9,35% di share". 23 September 2016.
  94. ^ "Scontro Boschi-Salvini. Ora Renzi corre ai ripari". 8 October 2016.
  95. ^ THE ITALIAN LAW JOURNAL- An International Forum for the Critique of Italian Law – Special Issue The 2016 Italian Constitutional Referendum: Origins, Stakes, Outcome, edited by Paolo Passaglia, p. 3, n. 3.
  96. ^ "Constitutional referendum puts an end to Renzi's government". Nationalia.
  97. ^ "Referendum, valanga di No in Sardegna: oltre il 72 per cento – Cronaca – la Nuova Sardegna". 5 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  98. ^ "Referendum 2016, il grande No della Sardegna con il 72,22%: la spina dell'Autonomia e il nodo province". 5 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  99. ^ "Referendum costituzionale, l'Alto Adige è la provincia d'Italia in cui si è votato di più per il sì: 63,77 – Cronaca – Alto Adige". 5 December 2016. Archived from the original on 6 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  100. ^ Antarctica is an extraterritorial place without any sovereignty: the 35 votes of Italian scientists in Antarctica were considered part of New Zealand
  101. ^ a b Susanna Capelouto; Juliet Perry; Ben Wedeman (4 December 2016). "Italy's PM Matteo Renzi to resign after constitutional referendum defeat". CNN.
  102. ^ "Matteo Renzi's referendum defeat risks Italy political crisis". BBC. 5 December 2016.
  103. ^ "Italy passes 2017 budget, paving way for Renzi to resign today". CNBC. Reuters. 7 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  104. ^ "Borsa, Milano piatta dopo referendum" (in Italian). ANSA. 5 December 2016.
  105. ^ Fausta Chiesa (6 December 2016). "Borse, Milano (+4%) ai massimi dalla Brexit, il rimbalzo delle banche" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera.
  106. ^ "Gentiloni gets the task from Mattarella". Rai News. Ansa. 11 December 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2016.


  • Di Mauro, Danilo; Memoli, Vincenzo (February 2018). "Targeting the Government in the Referendum: The Aborted 2016 Italian Constitutional Reform". Italian Political Science Review. 48 (2). Cambridge University Press: 133–157. doi:10.1017/ipo.2017.31. S2CID 158555880.
  • Negri, Fedra; Rebessi, Elisa (January 2018). "Was Mattarella Worth the Trouble? Explaining the Failure of the 2016 Italian Constitutional Referendum". Italian Political Science Review. 48 (2). Cambridge University Press: 177–196. doi:10.1017/ipo.2017.29. hdl:2434/562060. S2CID 158906172.