This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
This is listed as 2007. I am wondering, should we list the individual series for TD instead to add more to this template, since they have their own pages? Like 2007 = Island, 2009 = Action, 2010 = World Tour, 2011 = Revenge of the Island? I wouldn't have suggested this before since there was a shortage of space, but with how BN has spaced out and improved this template there would be room in these years for the individually titled TD season listings. Any thoughts? 10/11 in particular look like lonely years and this would give them company and make the recent years more valuable to list on their own. Bonechamber (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Those 4 are seasons, this template only lists main series, which for Total Drama it started in 2007. Giggett (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The year 1998 should not be included in the template, and any edits that attempt to add it to the template should be considered unconstructive unless other factors are involved. See Teletoon#History for more information regarding the channel during the year in question. Mdrnpndr (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
User:126.96.36.199, I've reverted your edit for a number of reasons. First of all, Treehouse TV actually produced new episodes of the shows mentioned; it did not simply air reruns as you claim. Second, Teletoon Retro/Télétoon Rétro deserve to be mentioned in this sense regardless of rerun status, as these were clearly spinoff channels from the main ones. Third, you added a show and a claim about another one without sourcing this anywhere; please let me know if you add citations to the corresponding articles for this (but note that one of the shows doesn't even have an article for it yet – and I'm not sure your capitalization of its title is correct, by the way). Fourth, you entirely failed to explain your removal of links to Teletoon at Night/Télétoon la nuit, the inclusion of which is obviously justified. Fifth, you added quite a bit of wordiness to the template separately from the previously-mentioned changes, once again without justification. Mdrnpndr (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Here are my reason why i did these changes: First, some of these shows according to their articles are actually questionable to if they actually new episodes or reruns. Second, Even if they are spinoff, it not worth mentioning here, other Corus channels rerun Teletoon originals and Teletoon itself rerun some of their originals; Cartoon Network (Canada) is also a spinoff channel but it is not mentioned, beside, Johnny Test and Totally Spies should have also been in this category since they had reran on Télétoon Rétro. Third, here the source for the show, which is in French by the way:http://www.corusent.com/home/Corporate/PressReleases/tabid/1697/Default.aspx?Id=3061 , also it is been revealed that it was going to be run on Adult Swim (Canada) by a bump as said title and and as yet to be post online. Fourth, Teletoon at Night/Télétoon la nuit also had predecessors for this category and Adult Swim (Canada) also has to be mentioned since they going to include series from this category and not just reruns. In another note, it best to say "Not shown on [channel]" than [Channel] only" because they weren't exclusive to said channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so your source for the new show is fine, but I would prefer we wait until the English-language version comes out in October and/or an article on the show is started, whichever comes first. This is because we cannot be sure of the correct capitalization of the English-language title from a single press release, and I'm fed up with moving pages back and forth based on the capitalization of a single letter. (Of course, adding the French-language title is out of the question since it wouldn't link to any feasible title here on the English-language Wikipedia.)
The Adult Swim (Canada) stuff continues to be largely unsourced. You may have noticed that I tagged the related citations at Fugget About It as having failed verification. This is because an announcement of the show simply airing (its existing episodes) on the block, even combined with a new season screening panel, is not even confirmation that the show will air the new season on the block, let alone that the new season was produced in association with the channel. What I need from you is confirmation of the Adult Swim logo appearing in the show's credits. (Same goes for "Night Sweats" and any other such shows.)
Cartoon Network (Canada) isn't really a spinoff channel of these any more than Disney Channel (Canada) is. I mean, CN was originally licensed as "Teletoon Kapow", but DC was licensed as "Teletoon Retro", so... The Retro channels, on the other hand, must be mentioned somewhere in this template because there is no question that they were direct spinoffs. Do you have a source regarding your claim about Johnny Test and Totally Spies!?
For the remaining issues: The nightly blocks, just like the Retro channels, must be mentioned somewhere in this template, but I don't think it's helpful to include all of the variations of their former names, especially since those variations don't have articles of their own, unlike the current names. Let me know which shows you think are questionable in terms of their status on Treehouse. As for the wording issue, I think we'll put that aside for now. Mdrnpndr (talk) 13:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)