User talk:Tomtheman5/Archive1

Olympic medal record
Competitor for Brazil
Men’s Football

Category:Stars

Why are you creating Category:Star when Category:Stars already exists? -- Curps 07:48, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'm so sorry - Here's my problem:

A star is a giant ball of gas in space. However, Stars is a well-known band from Montreal

I'd like to create an entry for this band, but currently the Stars entry redirects to Star. A bunch of other entries link to Stars, and I am in the process of changing those links so that they go to star instead.

Additionally, I found the Stars category. The main article of this category should be Star, since Stars is just a redirect page. But with the catmore tag, I didn't see a way to do this, unless I disregard the catmore tag and instead just enter it manually. Is that ok to do?

Do you have any more suggestions?

There's a common mechanism in Wikipedia for dealing with things that have the same name. See for instance, Mercury (element) and Mercury (planet). So you should create your page at Stars (band).

The Category:Stars is not the same thing as the page Stars. The category is for classifying things that are stars (or for sub-categories which classify things that are stars).

-- Curps 08:50, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I just noticed that there already is a page at Stars (band), originally created February 25 by User:Bearcat. -- Curps 08:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh that's great!

Now, someone types in "stars" and they get redirected to "star." Is there something that I can put on the Star page that will redirect people who were actually looking for the band?

I added a standard notice at the top of Star for the band.

In general, there are various ways to deal with disambiguation. In some cases, like Mercury the chemical element and Mercury the planet, the two are equally important, so the Mercury page is just a disambiguation page. In other cases, one usage is more common than the others so the page goes directly to it instead of serving as a disambiguation page, and a separate "X (disambiguation)" page is created. There's more detail at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. -- Curps 09:17, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I was having a little difficulty with that. I didn't know if the plural form made it a different term or not, so I looked at the following:

Strokes -- points to the band

Vines -- points to the plant

Doors -- points to the band

Eagles -- points to the animal

and that completely confused me. Thank you for clarifying, and thanks for your help. I hope I didn't make your life too difficult...

Image:Cowbell2.gif

I'm afraid this image is used in articles under fair uses and therefore its use is not allowed on user pages. Could you remove it please?Geni 10:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done... I fixed the culprit! tiZom 19:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk reply

I have replied to your help desk question. On another note, it may be considered poor etiquette to remove what is on your talk page. See "Can I do whatever I want to my own user talk page?". jnothman ^talk 00:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help with the numbered list! bcatt 00:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DDR arrow image.

I realized one thing that we neglected to consider. Instead of using a DDR arrow, we may use the aarow used in IN the Groove (or from Stepmania). As the game use MIT License, we should be able to use its images without any copyright complications. SYSS Mouse 03:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed [1] tiZom_{(the man)} 18:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medal Infobox

Oh, I had already done that infobox the day before you made that! :o\ (See {{Olympic Record}}) Ahh well, I updated yours so that the olympic rings picture meshes better with the background color. I also added a {{MedalDisqualified}}, because I have seen this on rare occasions where a medal was taken away, and I believe this is significant. I wanted to add it to the talk pages, but first, I wanted to clear it through you...
As for my own {{Olympic Record}} template, should I just point it to these ones here? Or send them off to TfD? There are only several articles that use it so far, so it's not a big deal. Let me know. tiZom_{(the man)} 06:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hey, sorry, didn't see that you'd made that one. My only thing is that Olympic record (btw, holy cripes does that need more info...) has a meaning similar to world record, and therefore having it as a header for the box might be confusing (perhaps just "Olympic medals" might work?). But the background color definitely looks better. And the Disqualified one is nice for these people (at least, the ones who won medals before being caught). I suggest redirects for the duplicate templates, as that's less work than TfDing them ;) but do whatever you feel should be done with them. -- Jonel | Speak 03:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wasn't too vocal about making it... I was just sort of playing around with it...didn't know anyone else would be too interested! Anyway, I changed the template to "Olympic Medal Record." Hope that works :o) Also, I templated all the talk pages to the {{MedalTop talk}} page. That way, if we have updates, we can just change the MedalTop page, and it can be seen from anywhere. I also added the {{MedalDisqualified}} template into the general instructions. Do you have a plan on getting this implemented throughout all the individual olympian pages? Let me know - if you have a system, I'd like to help. Don't have too much free time on my hands, but I do love the Olympics :o) tiZom_{(the man)} 04:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got all of the 1896 Summer Olympics medal winners done (old Olympics are quite fun to look at and compare to modern ones--though old Olympic Reports leave much to be desired). Starting to get busy as heck with "real life" stuff, so I'm probably not going to be doing too much on WP for a while. Sreed1234 (talk · contribs) has been pretty active recently on Olympics stuff, you might talk with her about it. -- Jonel | Speak 05:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Table Formatting

Hey, I was wondering if you could help me with something: I'm trying to make some results pages for some Torino events, but I'm having a little trouble with tables. I saw your little tournament template that you've got (User:Jonel/Bracket-test), and that's really advanced, so I figured you'd know this :o) If you would, take a look at this. I'd like to remove the vertical border lines surrounding the athletes' names, as well as the horizontal line that separates them. Do you know how I do that? tiZom_(2¢) 00:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've mostly just modified that from Template:Round16-waiting. As for removing the border lines, those are part of the wikitable class. MediaWiki:Common.css is where you can find the CSS for the class. Drop the class tag, and the lines disappear. You can pull desired attributes from the CSS page. You can add borders selectively through tags like

style="border-width:0 0 2px 0; border-style: solid;border-color:black;"

The order of the 4 border segments is top, right, bottom, left. Higher px numbers give thicker borders. #aaaaaa is the standard gray color used by wikitables, if you want that color. Let me know if this helps. -- Jonel | Speak 01:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Curling at the 2006 Winter Olympics

I reverted your change that removed the {{current sport}} template from Curling at the 2006 Winter Olympics, since the Men's gold and bronze medal matches aren't until Friday February 24 2006 --rogerd 02:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oops! Sorry - I backed out of that save, but I guess not in time. Thanks for catching that error! tiZom_(2¢) 03:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GoldMedal-bgwhite.png

Could you explain what happened here?

I don't see why this conversion was necessary in the first place.
- The transparency doesn't work in all browsers. In mine, for instance, the transparency was showing up as black (which looked terrible...). I changed it to white, but then didn't realize that I should have used the gray tone that's used in the table itself.
In your edit summary it says you used AWB, does AWB automatically convert images with transparency to images with a white background? I could see some serous problems if this is the case.
- I only use AWB because I have a terribly slow internet connection, and the save almost always fails on me if I'm saving on a normal browser. Sorry for the confusion!
The conversion was done incorrectly. My image contains an alpha channel, by the image was not blended correctly with the background in your image.
- What I did was really rough. I don't have much graphic capability, and I didn't think it mattered terribly, especially since it is on such a small scale.
You changed the license from GFDL to public domain, while I doubt my image is ellegible for copyright I would have preffered if you had contacted me first.
- You're right - I should have paid attention to your license. I'm very foreign to the whole copyright thing, and when I looked at the list, that's just what I figured you would have put down. Very sorry about that.

Cheers, —Ruud 21:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, we are not even sure if we're going to be using images on this template at all. Please see Wikipedia:Olympic Conventions. tiZom_(2¢) 21:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the background-color of Wikipedia pages is not fixed. I depends on the skin you use etc. What browser do you use? I know PNG redering is f*cked up in Internet Explorer 5 and the it is definitly fixed in IE7. Don't know about about IE6, though. —Ruud 21:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, like a good portion of the world, I'm still using IE6. I do know that gif's have the capability of displaying some transparencies (on all the browsers I've seen anyway. Any way you could convert it to gif for now? tiZom_(2¢) 21:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the developers if there is any change that MediaWiki will convert the images automatically for IE6 users, if not I will convert them to GIFs tomorrow. (b.t.w. I'm watching your talk page so you don't have to respond on mine.) —Ruud 22:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've converted the PNG iamges to GIF images? Do you like how they look now? This unfortunatly means we can't use a background color which differs significantly from white or very light gray anymore. Cheers, —Ruud 00:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, so there's no way to fix it with the png's? I just changed the background colors...lol. But I don't think it looks terrible... tiZom_(2¢) 00:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use Firefox :p. —Ruud 00:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Rings

Hi, I just have a question about the removal of the Olympic Rings from the MedalTop template. I was under the impression that this was a free image. Per the Olympic Charter, anyone is allowed to use the pictures of the rings as long as they promote the Olympic Movement, which I've no doubt this does. If you don't mind, I need to know which license I can apply to this picture so that we can use it to refer to the the Olympic committees, the Olympic Games, and Olympic athletes. Thanks for your help! tiZom_(2¢) 20:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Under the IOCs conditions, the Olympic Rings are not free enough for Wikipedia, as they restrict third-party use (worse, they restrict our use). ed g2s • talk 00:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

medal infobox 2

Hi, could you please point me to the place where you discussed adding the names of the cities to medal infobox? The other guy and I think that's not a nice thing. --Dijxtra 07:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. I didn't like it either, because it was too lengthy. But it was discussed at Template talk:MedalTop#Games location with year?. And after I started doing it, I found it gave a good frame of reference. Sorry, I was unaware of the discussion elsewhere. What should we do from here? tiZom_(2¢) 14:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I joined the discussion there. I propose you stop the adding of names for a day until the discussion there is concluded. --Dijxtra 14:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi. On February 14, you placed an {{underconstruction}} tag on this page. You havn't made any edits since then, so unless you say otherwise, I am going to remove the tag in a few days for the convenience of other users. Thanks. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 21:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, like the talk page says, there ended up being way too much work to do on the Torino Olympics. I took the template off, and I wrote that this was an incomplete list. (For the time being, of course) tiZom_(2¢) 22:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I didn't think to look at the talk page, so I didn't know that you said that. Best regards. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 22:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Comment on WP:Olympic conventions

Thank you very much for the comment. I don't want to be the person here taking in all of the glory (because I was the one who created the page, but it is you guys who made it happen), so don't get me wrong, but ever since I created the page I've heard negative feedback from people who disagreed with the outcomes, so it's nice to hear a good comment for a change. I totally agree with you that it is past its "infant" stage, so to speak, and it needs more structure and attention. What I don't want to do, though, is take over what the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics has already set out. I think that things would get hostile if we just decided to do things our own way. I suggest letting them know what we propose to do first, and let them decide if it is right. I think sistering up with them would be our first goal...it'll get us some more needed public attention. If you have any additional ideas, feel free to voice them on my page or the olympic con. page. Thank, again! --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 22:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPorject Sports Olympics

Welcome to the project, Hope you enjoy your stay and can get envolved. Can I encourage you to add {{user WikiProject Olympics}} to your user page as this advertises us more and adds you to the participants category. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)} 07:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent!

King, please go to this page ASAP, as the Olympic conventions pages have been nominated for deletion! I trust that you like them a lot and from your edits, you are not willing to lose all of the work you put in. I urge you to vote "Keep", as 3 weeks of work are about to go down the drain! Thanks. (and tell other active contributors.) --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 20:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I voted to move it into the Wikiproject, if they will allow it. I figure that with the main options being keep and delete, this seems like a viable compromise. I don't want to lose all that work, and I think it will be a little bit more fitting as part of the Wikiproject. Hope that's ok! tiZom_(2¢) 05:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry....I sent it to a bunch of people (hope you don't mind) and I forgot to change the name. haha. Well a move vote is good! I don't mind. I'm only trying to keep it so I don't have to give in to them. I will say move only when I have to, but I do agree it should be moved. Sorry again. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 12:08, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medal template use in non-olympic contexts

I noticed when editing a page that uses Template:MedalTopEAA (European track and field (athletics) championships medal table top) that Template:MedalGold, Template:MedalSilver, and Template:MedalBronze have the undesirable side-effect of adding the page to an olympic medal category.

So I created new templates just for use in non-olympic contexts: Template:MedalGoldGeneric, Template:MedalSilverGeneric, and Template:MedalBronzeGeneric which don't do any adding to categories.

I went ahead and updated all the pages affected by this that I found linking to Template:MedalTopEAA, but I don't know about other non-olympic medal table contexts.

(This pertains to your edits on Linford Christie and Sebastian Coe, Baron Coe when you cleaned up the medal tables.) -- Mareklug ^talk 20:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh...good catch! I hadn't thought about that. Actually, I was entirely unaware of those categories...seems like someone added those after the fact. I know that the {{MedalTopEAA}} template is the only one that I created. I'm unsure if anyone else created anything different. Maybe for each {{MedalTopXXX}} template, we could have {{MedalGoldXXX}} so that we can add appropriate categories...sound like a good idea? I'm sure there aren't too many widespread competitions that give out gold, silver, and bronze medals. tiZom_(2¢) 23:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked in the template index starting with "MedalTop" and Template:MedalTopEAA is the only one there beside the two Olympic ones (standard and the one for pictures). I'm not sure how to look for templates for other competitions; there may not be any. For now I hesitate to adopt a policy that unnecessarily spawns templates -- the Olympic medal templates do the special category adding to Olympic medal categories, yes, but there may be no need for that for other competitions. For now, I'd say, let's just remember to use Template:MedalGoldGeneric (and its Silver and Bronze variants) with non-Olympic competitions. And yes, the idea of giving out gold, silver and bronze medals is a generic idea -- in sports and otherwise -- and includes such things as World Championships, European Championships, Commonwealth Games, Pan-Am Games in many sports and other regional championships as well as various national competions. Chances are they all merely need what the Template:MedalGoldGeneric, Template:MedalSilverGeneric and Template:MedalBronzeGeneric provide: formatting a single row in a medal table with no side-effects. -- Mareklug ^talk 00:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological Order

Hey, I'm sorry for reverting your stuff. I had completely missed out on that part of the conversation ... I've put in my two cents about the order of things on the talk page. Sue Anne 02:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic conventions debate

Hi all! The debate on Olympic conventions has been moved and is now under the auspices of WikiProject Sports Olympics/Olympic conventions. We are now trying to decide what to do with all of the data that has been collected and start some sort of "governance". If you'd like to take part in this discussion, feel free to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports_Olympics#Ground_rules (the WikiProject talk page). We would appreciate your help! --J @red ^[T]/_[+] 20:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hey, i was wondering how you did all the cloured boxes at the top of your page that has little peices of info about you. did you use some kind of tool for it, or make it yourself?? If it isn't your i dont suppose you can help me so i can construct my own?? Would be very grateful

I dont know how internal messages work so can you just email me at dezzy1@gmail.com

Thanks

Helpful User

Thanks Very Much for your detailed assistance!! Not to sound too ardent (or crazy) but my admiration of American people continues to grow. Regards Sumit Desai 11:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BronzeMedalSmall.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BronzeMedalSmall.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 23:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:BronzeMedalSmall.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BronzeMedalSmall.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 23:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GoldMedalSmall.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:GoldMedalSmall.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 23:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:GoldMedalSmall.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GoldMedalSmall.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 23:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SilverMedalSmall.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SilverMedalSmall.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Such hassle! ...I've put speedy delete tags on them all, because I don't remember the copyright status, and also the discussion in which they were used is over. tiZom_(2¢) 15:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Olympic-rings.png removed from your user page

An image or media file, Image:Olympic-rings.png, has been removed from your userpage or user talk page because it was licensed as fair use. Wikipedia's fair use policy states that fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's fair use policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of fair use images. Thank you for your cooperation.

joturn e r 16:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but be a little more careful next time. You actually didn't remove any images at all. But don't worry, I took care of it. Thanks for the notice :o) tiZom_(2¢) 17:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did remove the image from your page (see here). However, I could completely understand if you thought I didn't remove any images, because there are in fact two images of Olympic rings Olympic-rings.png, the image I said I removed, and Olympic rings.svg, the images you removed. Obviously, the fact that we have two images that depict the exact same thing needs to be rectified. joturn e r 18:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Competitor country template

Hi Tom, thanks for your comment at regarding adding the country for a competitor. I have created a test version at User:Mattbr30/Sandbox if you would like to have a look, and let me know what you think. Thanks, mattbr³⁰ 20:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll admit that I'm very concerned with the coding here, as I'm a big advocate of WP:AUM. I mean, that's why we did the medal infobox like this in the first place, with the MedalTop and MedalBottom templates. You did a great job on the coding there, and I'm wondering if maybe there is a way to get the best of both worlds. My question is this:

Is there a way to create, say, an {{addNOC}} template, such that when you subst: it, then the resulting text is itself a template with parameters?

For example, say you have page Ronaldo. When we add your template to his existing infobox, we get

{{MedalTop}}
{{MedalNOC   | BRA | 1996}}
{{MedalSport | Men’s [[Football at the Summer Olympics|Football]]}}
{{MedalBronze| [[1996 Summer Olympics|Atlanta 1996]]|Team Competition}}
{{MedalBottom}}

I'd like to instead code this

{{MedalTop}}
{{subst:addNOC| BRA | 1996}}
{{MedalSport  | Men’s [[Football at the Summer Olympics|Football]]}}
{{MedalBronze | [[1996 Summer Olympics|Atlanta 1996]]|Team Competition}}
{{MedalBottom}}

And then when it gets saved, the resulting code in the Ronaldo article shows like this:

{{MedalTop}}
{{MedalNOC   | Brazil | Flag of Brazil.svg}}
{{MedalSport | Men’s [[Football at the Summer Olympics|Football]]}}
{{MedalBronze| [[1996 Summer Olympics|Atlanta 1996]]|Team Competition}}
{{MedalBottom}}

This way, the meta-templates are only called for the first save, and from then on, it is a single-layer template. Because the only reason that you have coded it your way is just to automate things, so that while coding, we don't have to remember which flag was Brazil using back in 1996, etc. Does this make any sense to you? I'm not that great at explaining this sort of thing :o\ tiZom_(2¢) 20:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. I understand what you are saying and, with my template, I'm not sure if your suggestion is possible because substing pastes the whole template and not just the results. The only other option I can think of at the moment (unless the flags were not included, but I would prefer not to) would be to have a template for each country, but this would create a large number of templates to manage, which I would also prefer not to have. I will have a think about it further and see if I can come up with something else. Thanks, mattbr³⁰ 19:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unified Team Flag

Hey, I noticed that we've both been removing Olympic Rings images all over, and so I was wondering what you thought about using Image:Flag of the Olympic Movement.svg as the 20px flag in pages like this. I feel that since the IOC let this entity use the Olympic Rings, then it should be free in this sense, i.e. only when the Rings are representing the flag that represented the Unified Team. But I don't know enough about copyright issues to make this decision. What do you think? tiZom_(2¢) 03:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know very little about copyright except what I see on Wikipedia pages (which, as we know, shouldn't be considered reliable sources). I've been acting to implement WP policy without really paying any attention to what's legally allowable (which, as far as I can tell, is quite a bit more than our policy provides for due to the free-content principle). In this case, my guess would be that the use we make of the Rings for EUN representation is under the terms of a (fairly minimally) restrictive license (the same license by which the EUN team itself used the image on its flag) rather than by the image being free. Then again, I'm not one of the nine people who understand the copyright law of my own country, much less the rest of the world, so... -- Jonel | Speak 23:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at WP:HD

Image tagging for pictures of products

I was just looking at the page for Milky Way candy bars (just hungry, I suppose...), and I noticed that the picture Image:Milky Way Wrapped.jpg was tagged as Public Domain. I know this is incorrect - is there a tag for pictures of products? I looked at the list of image license tags but couldn't find it. I'm certainly no expert on copyrights. If possible, could someone get back to me on my talk page? Thanks! tiZom_(2¢) 04:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your question, I think {{Promotional}} would be an appropriate tag there -- Lost ^(talk) 04:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes in a grid on your User Page?

Thanks for your help with the map image.

Your user boxes display very well.

Where can I find out about the USER : UBX tag that you have used?

GeoFan49 00:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's just something I did for myself, to keep myself a little better organized. All I did was create a separate user page and named it User:Tomtheman5/UBX. This essentially creates a subdirectory under my user page. Then I put all my userboxes there (using code). Follow the link, and you'll see what I mean.

Then, to include the entire contents of my "UBX" sub-page into my main user page, I just used the code [[:User:Tomtheman5/UBX]]. (Remember to use that first colon)

I did this also with my "to do" list, my sandboxes, and my milestones page. This way, the code for my main user page is nice and clean, and all the edits are made in the sub-pages.

If you choose to do this, and you need help with it, please, just let me know! tiZom_(2¢) 02:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:City of Cranston RI Seal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:City of Cranston RI Seal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Tim Cuddihy; El Salvador at the 1992 Summer Olympics; Leroi Moore; Korea at the 2000 Summer Olympics; Cameroon at the 2004 Summer Olympics; Stefan Lessard; Wrestling at the Summer Olympics; Chile at the 2004 Summer Olympics; Tajikistan at the 1996 Summer Olympics; Philippines at the 1972 Summer Olympics; Butch Taylor; El Salvador at the 1984 Summer Olympics; Guo Jingjing; Venezuela at the 2000 Summer Olympics; Kim Soo-Nyung; Peter Griesar; Mike Barrowman; The Departure; Liechtenstein at the 2004 Summer Olympics

Cleanup: Versus; Into the Rush; Dizzee Rascal
Merge: Jesse Mashburn; List of songs featured in television commercials; Funk metal
Add Sources: Doves; Fencing at the Summer Olympics; Placebo (band)
Wikify: Didier Drogba; Derartu Tulu; Millencolin
Expand: Stefan Holm; Belarus at the 2000 Summer Olympics; Germantown Academy

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Best (designer) deletion

Hey, just wanted to see if you knew anything about this. I think I've missed a deletion review along the way, but I can't seem to find it. In any case, this deletion seems to have been very poorly documented. Take a look and tell me what you think! Thanks. tiZom_(2¢) 20:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Project Runway designer bios... No, I never heard from the admin, Alkivar, and I believe he also simply deleted my message to him on his Talk page. However, the good news is that the last I checked the bios for Laura Bennett and Uli Herzner were reverted by other users. I now consider Alkivar to be abusing his authority as an admin to be deleting articles in this way. Crunch 01:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you look at Alkivar's deletion log, it looks like he had a little fit of deleting both Project Runway and Top Chef contestant articles all within a span of minutes on October 6, 2006 and all without due process even when some have survived votes for deletion. If you can advise how to stop this kind of abuse by admins, I'd appreciate it. Looking at this guy's discussion page, he doesn't seem like the most popular admin. You may have to look at the history of his Talk page because he tends to delete the critical message. Crunch 01:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alkivar has deleted my comments without getting back to me, but had no problems deleting my comments to him [2]. Has he gotten back to you yet? There's nothing on your talk page that I can see... tiZom_(2¢) 15:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still no word from Alkivar, but he continues to delete comments on his Talk page from me and others on this matter and others on the same issue and others like it. I tracked down the history of his nomination and voting as an admin see here and it seems it took three attempts and even then it was tenuous for the reasons we've seen here. I'm not sure if this is a permanent appointment, or if it comes up for renewal. In any case, it looks as if some of these deleted bios have been recreated without interference from Alkivar. Crunch 13:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've probably seen that Alkivar has now put an arrogant and snotty responose to you on this talk page. Unbelievable. Crunch 00:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did see the message he left - All I really got from it was: "I'm an admin, I can do whatever I want, blah blah..." I try not to let it bother me. Ah well, I'm very non-confrontational, and it seems you are as well. :o) So it's possible that we'll never get our way with this issue. I mean, I'm a bit iffy as to whether or not Robert Best was indeed notable enough to have a page, but still I'd like to have seen the correct actions taken to remove the article. tiZom_(2¢) 03:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Wertz & Dave Barnes

G'day, I noticed you created Matt Wertz's Wiki page. I was wondering, have you heard of Dave Barnes? You might notice I've used an offsite link. That's because there's no Wiki page for him. He's a musician who's (as yet) more successful than Wertz, but of the same ilk as him. I'd like to start the page but, frankly, I don't know much about him and am a moderate google ninja, but I notice you seem to be pretty good at getting info. My main question (or, more a request): Do you want to create the page? I'd be more than happy to pitch in where I can (generally, I pay more attention to the design of the pages than to the content, so I'd suck at starting it... primarily, you'd probably notice I'm mostly started up templates or stubs). --lincalinca 08:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)![reply]

I have heard of Dave Barnes... in fact, I met him once after a Matt/Dave concert here in Boston :o) I haven't done a page yet for him because

I don't know too much about him
I didn't know he was as notable (WP:N) as Matt. I knew Matt toured nationally with some famous artists, but I had just thought that Dave Barnes was only touring with Matt... which I don't think would fly here at WP. Now that I'm reading the bio on his site though, there's no doubt in my mind that he's notable enough.

I'll take a look and see if I can come up with anything. Any help is appreciated! tiZom_(2¢) 14:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Tom, Though I'd mention that I got off my laurels and decided to make up the Dave Barnes page after all. Please check it out and tell me what you think. And make any adjustments that you can find. Funny as it might sound, I can't find any reference to his date of birth anywhere. Plus, the page still needs some work, particularly in the touring, personal life, christian life and other sections. In short, it's still a stub, but it's on its way now. If you know or can find his DOB, please update the page. ta --lincalinca 09:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey that's great! Sorry for not getting around to it - "real life" has got me busy. At any rate, you seem to know more about him than I do, so can I suggest that you add something that proves that Barnes is notable? For example, with Wertz's page, I was sure to include bands that he'd toured with. It's important, because if the WP community doesn't see that he's notable, then the page might get AFD'd. I'll keep an eye on the page. tiZom_(2¢) 21:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thanks for getting back to me on that. I've just done some extra info adding and things are looking in pretty good shape with the Dave Barnes page. All of my searches have yeilded me much information, so the page has had a bit more of an infoboost and, more importantly, a real notability boost. Still, if you have anything to add to the page, though, feel free to. you may notice that I've touched up Matt Wertz page just with the infobox and discog and uploaded all of the album covers for you over there. Thanks again! --lincalinca 07:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A few things about the images:

First of all, I reverted the smaller image you had for the CD cover - we're supposed to be using low-resolution images for CD covers.
Second, I took the CD cover image off of Dave Barnes' page because CD cover images can only be used on pages that talk specifically about the album in question. This leads me to a question: Do you have a picture of Dave Barnes in concert? Something like that would be better to use in this situation.

See Template:albumcover for more information.

I hate to be the one fixing this and teling you about it, but I suppose you'd rather hear it from me than some user bot in the future. :o) tiZom_(2¢) 00:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox_Company

I saw you might be able to help with a Template import problem. I was trying to import the Template:Infobox_Company to my mediawiki installation, v 1.8.2 . But it comes out all messed up. Seems like I am missing something to do with css. Could you help me understand this better, it would be a lot of help to me. ThankYou Rovo79 21:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, here's the deal (or as much as I can gather...) The css for the infobox on WP is stored at MediaWiki:Common.css. You could copy that over to TCPedia wherever the CSS styles are saved on that page if you want, but in the meantime, I just copied over the actual code, so the template is all set there until you get that done. Aside from that, there are some other problems with the template. I'm no expert, but it seems that the ParserFunctions are not set up on that wiki. To get them set up, I think that m:ParserFunctions#Installation will help you. If it doesn't help, then check elsewhere on that page, and if that doesn't help, try the folks down at the Help Desk. tiZom_(2¢) 00:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome Thanks for the assistance, I think I got it now. Your homepage looks awesome by the way, great icons.Rovo79 19:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I still seem to be having a slight problem with the infobox company template. I copied over the CSS, and installed the parser function, but still seem to have a problem. Any chance you could take a peak? Here's an example, http://www.wikistock.com/wiki/Tokyo_Stock_Exchange . I almost got it, but seem to missing one thing. I greatly appreciate any feedback on this. Thanks Rovo79 15:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the userpage reverts. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 02:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for reverting vandilsm on my user page. Drestros power 21:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Drestros power[reply]

Image:KoC-Eirik.jpg

That's a great photo. Was it taken at the Paradise? If so, not just was I at that show, but I was standing first row, directly in front of Eirik. In fact, that was one of my favorite concerts ever. -- Kicking222 14:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Were you the one that started rapping? lol... Yes, that was at Paradise, and so funny that you were there too! I have a bunch of other pictures as well (probably one or two with you in the background!), though none of them came out that good, as I was using a not-so-great camera at the time. Nevertheless, if you care to see them, just let me know, and I'll e-mail them to you. Like you, I've been to a lot of concerts in the area, and I still contend that the KoC concert was my favorite ever. My biggest pet peeve is a concert that is too loud, but KoC kept it calm and soothing, as always :o) tiZom_(2¢) 16:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no, that wasn't me- I'm not that cocky/annoying. I love the Paradise, and I've seen a few shows there (Feist also sticking out in my mind). As you used to, my girlfriend goes to BU, and last year (as a freshman) she lived in the building right behind the club, which had its good and bad points. KoC definitely kept everything soothing and sweet, but they also have so much humor. And when Erlend started dancing... oh man, that was something else. That was defintely up there with the best concerts I've ever seen, if not the best. Please, feel free to send pictures from that one, and thanks in advance. -- Kicking222 17:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kid Beyond

I've restored the text of Kid Beyond. Please ensure that the article meets notability criteria as soon as possible, or else it may be deleted again. Thanks! theProject 05:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use insertion

Hello there, juz wanna say thank you for helping to put the insertion for the image provided... I have been hounded by Elcda0 for no apparent reason that hewas so particular about the images uploaded... If you look into all the ANTM Cycle pages, etc... judges, winners, you would see that I have uploaded the image of the subject just to make the page look aesthetically nice. But he was so insistent which i am sure he complained to the administrator who gave me a last warning. I don;t know about this but i have always pride myself as a fair contributor and the images i have used are always copyright free... was wondering if you can help me rectify this problem. i have also been helping Stealthusa as wsell, but both of us are always tweened by Elcda0, please help! Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Apollolancer (talk • contribs) 20:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Your ANTM image

I'm not an expert, but that image you uploaded from Cycle 1 most likely qualifies for fair use, since it's small, was used in advertisements, and (most importantly) was released by UPN.com as a promotional image. The issue JKelly and I are having with Apollolancer and Stealthusa is something different; those two are uploading the photoshoot pictures from cwtv.com, believing them to be in the public domain. Elcda0 18:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh, ok. The ones from the CoverGirl shoot? I saw that. Yes, that definitely needs to go. Let me know if you need me to back you up with that issue :o) tiZom_(2¢) 18:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

I have noticed you offer for adopting me but I don't think your interests mirror mine sorry.

Fair use on Olympic rings

The Olympic rings image is not tagged as fair use, and in fact is hosted on Commons. What is your basis for concluding that the use in articles in inconsistent with the licensing of the image? Guettarda 19:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was a big problem a while back. At the time, we were using Image:Olympic rings white.png, which was marked as Fair Use, but has since been deleted. Ed g2s and I had a brief edit war over it (See the page history of Template:MedalTop), and then when I read up on policy a little more, I realized that he was right. The Olympic logo is a copyrighted logo. As it is not a free image, it falls within Fair Use doctrine, and we should be using it sparingly, no matter how much the Olympic Committee allows it. There's a talk topic at Template talk:MedalTop#Olympic logos which has a little more info, should you need it.

I have been removing this image sporadically for months now as a personal side-project. I hadn't noticed that the image that I'm removing now isn't licensed completely. Perhaps this will need to be revisited. tiZom_(2¢) 20:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case you really need to get it deleted from Commons. Content on Wikipedia may or may not be fair use, but content on Commons needs to be free. If the description is inaccurate, it really needs to be fixed, ASAP. Guettarda 20:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was afraid of that. But to be honest, it's really not that big of a deal. I mean, I've been removing almost all instances of it anyway. So all I have to do is finish removing all of these images and then move the image over to WP.

Though, I'm confused that the second copyright template says that "the issue is being discussed on a policy level" but doesn't give a link. What do you think I should do? tiZom_(2¢) 21:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

I am not having a good day with these things, forgot my signature twice, and now didn't copy your name right. *tsk* *tsk* I will fix that in a second, thanks for telling me. Prodego ^talk 23:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I can't. It looks like I broke the userlist and now there is no way to log in to VP to fix it. That seems to be a pretty bad design flaw. So now no one can use VandalProof until AmiDaniel fixes it (and he has been gone 3 days). Now I am having a really bad day... Prodego ^talk 23:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for answering my question quickly here. By the way, your user page is one of the best user pages I have ever seen.

--Meno25 23:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Barnes

Thanks! I thought it was pretty good too!!

--linca ^linca 04:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Giants

Unencyclopedic my ass. That actually happened. Were you even watching the game, or jacking off to loli like most wikipedos? 76.171.5.12 01:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)The FBI[reply]

This is not encyclopedic. The details of one loss do not belong in an encyclopedia unless you clearly indicate why it is important. Also, it is not in the correct format for an encyclopedia, and it reads like nonsense. Additionally, no personal attacks please. tiZom_(2¢) 01:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT

Hi there,

As a user looking to Adopt with the Adopt-a-User program, there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention, as well as request help with the backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

You should know that the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking. Once adoption is complete please use the templates found here on the Adoptee's and your user page.

Also numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

Furthermore a new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you have and if you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.

So I hope you get adopting soon - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 15:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stepmaniaarrow.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stepmaniaarrow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category for Template:Trademark

Just curious: why did you remove Category:Trademarked images from Template:Trademark? Also, what are you opinions on the template? --Iamunknown 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I had just replaced it entirely with the Commons version. I suppose the removal of that template was inadvertant.

Anyway... my thoughts? At first I thought it was very important. I mean, we can't go having people upload homemade product pictures like Image:Gameboy.jpg and release them into the public domain. To me, that just doesn't make sense. But someone told me that the pictures can belong to one person, the trademark to another. So I thought that we could just put this template on all the pictures like the one above. But then I realized that this is already covered... on the disclaimers that are listed at the bottom of every single Wikipedia page. So I guess it's really a moot point.

I'd still like to see that extra warning though. What do you think? tiZom_(2¢) 06:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I have about it is from you. :D I never read those disclaimers before, and I'm sure no one else has either. I do agree that placing it as an extra warning is a good idea. What I find disconcerting is that it is only a few trademarked images. Maybe we can reqeust an edit to {{logo}} to include &#123{trademark}} at the bottom? Also, I think I'm going to nominate Category:Trademarked images for deletion. It has been empty since you copied the template on 30 November, there really is no need for the category, and currently it is totally miscategorized in Category:Images by copyright status. --Iamunknown 07:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics WikiProject membership update

The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

The Olympics WikiProject team

Adoption

Thanks for the offer. I could really use the help. The main reason I put the request up is that I found myself spending a lot of time reading "help" pages and not figuring out how to do something. I think it would help to have someone I can ask who would either know the answer or send me to the right place. malatesta 17:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case that is not clear enough, I wholeheartedly accept. thanks malatesta 17:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright

OK, my first question. I am trying to upload an image for Bisbee Deportation and am confused by which category I should use as far as copyright licensing. I found a link on the page where the image is hosted: http://aquarius.library.arizona.edu/exhibits/bisbee/copyright.html which gives info on copyright. Can I upload one of these images? thanks malatesta 20:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright stuff can get pretty involved, because people are very strict about it. Ready? Here goes:

There are two kinds of images that we can use on WP: free images and unfree images.

An image is free if the owner has given up the copyright, or if it is ineligible for copyright (it's produced by the government, it's really old, etc) - The full list of reasons are at Wikipedia:Copyrights and, in particular, Wikipedia:Public domain. It's pretty extensive, and I'd be happy to help you understand it if you need more help on that.

This image, however, is unfree - the copyright is owned by University of Arizona. In order for us to lawfully use this image, we either need (1) permission from the copyright holder to re-license it (in most cases, they won't do this, because they lose a little control on the copyright...but seeing as how it's a University, it might be worth a shot), or (2) a good reason to use it regardless of copyright status. Wikipedia can, for example, use corporate logos, movie screenshots, album covers, etc. because we need to have the ability to demonstrate what the subject is, but there is nothing out there that could be used to replace it (e.g. you can't find a "free equivalent" to the NBC Peacock or the cover for The Dark Side of the Moon - it is what it is). This idea is called Fair use, and it allows Wikipedia to use a lot of copyrighted materials. There are, however, a bunch of restrictions. See the Fair Use page, or ask me with any questions.

What is the image, exactly? Post a link to it, and I'll give you my input...

Keep in mind that the goal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia of free content. So whenever possible, we should be using free images.

Sorry for being so long-winded, but it took me quite a while to understand all this copyright stuff. Hope this helps a little. tiZom_(2¢) 21:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the link to the photo I want to use: http://www.library.arizona.edu/exhibits/bisbee/primarysources/photographs/deportation.html The caption says that it belongs to the Arizona Historical Society(AHS). I was rereading the copyright info on the page and it said that the images could be used for educational purposes. Could that be construed as meaing its ok for wikipedia? malatesta 17:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link didnt copy correctly, but I want to use the 4th from the left.malatesta 17:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry for the delay. I was in Montreal for the weekend, and was supposed to have internet access at the hotel... but let's not get into that :o)

Regarding the image copyright problem. If it says that you can use it for educational purposes, unfortunately that will still not be enough for Wikipedia. The problem is that the main goal of WP is to create a free and open encyclopedia that anyone can use for any purpose. This means that somewhere down the line, someone may use it in a way that is not educational... and thereby going against the copyright owner's requests. This is why we use free images first, and use unfree ones only when it is necessary.

I had a strikingly similar problem when I was working on a template for Olympic Medal winners (See, for example, the medal infobox on the page for Alexandre Despatie. It used to have a picture of the Olympic Rings because the Olympic Charter says you can use the rings for anything that promotes the Olympic Movement (which pages like this certainly did). However, the image was removed (diff) because somewhere down the road, someone might use our free encyclopedia in a way that does not promote the Olympic Movement.

If I were you, I'd try to e-mail the copyright holders and get permission to license that image under the GFDL license - it's the one that allows the copyright holder to keep the most control over the image. Otherwise, you might want to try to find that image (...or something similar) in a link on this page: Wikipedia:Free image resources. Lots of historical stuff there. tiZom_(2¢) 20:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Silverman image

Tomtheman5 - please contact me at (E-Mail removed for security purposes) about my Sarah Silverman photo you uploaded from Flickr. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Archman8 (talk • contribs).

I've e-mailed you, and I am awaiting a response. tiZom_(2¢) 14:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

I would like to use it but I usually edit while at work (they get what they pay for which is very little) and I doubt the IT fascists would like it. A question though, I tried to nominate for deletion Michael Aaron McGowan and added it to the articles for deletion page put it didn't look right after I did it. What did I do wrong?malatesta 21:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, here's what happened: When you nominate an article for deletion, you have to do three things. I'll go ahead and do it, and give you links to show you what I did:

Put a message on the article's page. Instead of just adding a message, you'll want to put this deletion template at the top of the article page (not the talk page): {{subst:afd1}}. "afd1" is a template which is substituted. You don't need to know about either, but just know that when you type {{subst:afd1}} on a page, it will create a box that displays information about the deletion debate. See this diff - All I did was add {{subst:afd1}}.
Create a new page to hold the discussion. This is done as a subpage of the AfD page. The previous step actually generated the link, all you need to do is follow it and start up the page. So go back to Michael Aaron McGowan, There will be a link in the deletion box that will say "this article's entry". Follow that link, and start this new discussion page with the text {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ Check this permalink - The text I started this page with was {{subst:afd2 | pg=Michael Aaron McGowan | cat=B | text=non-notable individual, reads almost like an advertisement}} ~~~~
Transclude that page onto the AfD log page. Take the title of the page in step 2, and add to the log by placing {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Aaron McGowan}} at the bottom of the AfD log page. This takes the entire content of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Aaron McGowan article (the discussion article), and includes it in the AfD log. (See this diff) Now, when you see the log, you'll see the deletion discussion. Now if you go to the log page, and try to edit that particular section, you'll actually go to the edit page for the subpage.

In fact, a lot of pages in the Wikipedia: namespace operate like that, Like Wikipedia:Featured article candidates, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, etc. The benefit is that all of the edits (people supporting/opposing) go on individual pages, rather than the respective main page. It's just better organized that way.

PS - You may want to check out the software that Mr. McGowan produced: Madeche vision. It seems like it might not be notable either, but I'll let you make that call, and decide if you want to nominate it. Let me know if you have any problems! tiZom_(2¢) 07:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:UBX/WikiProject Olympics

How come this isn't working? _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 22:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??? That's got me baffled... hold on, I'm going to try subst:'ing the generic userbox template. tiZom_(2¢) 22:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AVB

Your recent edit to Brigitte Bardot (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AVB false positive. Left message on talk page. tiZom_(2¢) 01:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hello. Can you please tell me how you identified this [3] edit as vandalism as you recorded in the edit history. Most people would not characterize changing a red link back to blue as such. If it was an error, as I suspect since you reverted yourself immediately afterwards, was this error caused by the tool you were using or by you personally? Either way, I think it would have been civil for you to revert yourself with a comment that the prior edit was not in fact vandalism, rather than just undoing yourself with the tool. Furthermore, if the error was that of the tool rather than yours, I would expect that you would report such error to the tool developer. Regards --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, for some reason I knew that would blow up in my face. I was on random patrol for vandalism. and, well, one sees certain words..."brat" being one of them... and one assumes it's vandalism, so I jumped on it. I was only looking at the changes, and I thought "military brat" couldn't possibly be a WP page. When it saved, I realized "military child" was red, checked both pages, realized I was wrong, and reverted myself. Didn't think it'd be a problem, but I will remember to explain myself in the edit summary if I make any mistakes in the future. tiZom_(2¢) 03:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~PS - I don't think civility is a policy to which you should refer in this case. I ignored (accidentally) a recommendation, but in no way whatsoever was I uncivil.~~ tiZom_(2¢) 03:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, I get it now - because it looks like I've accused you of vandalism. Gotcha. Very sorry, I'll remember this in the future. tiZom_(2¢) 03:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. Just for clarification, I don't think that you were uncivil, especially since I didn't think that there was any malice intended on your part whatsoever. (As a side note, if I had I would have probably linked to wp:civ as you did in your response - not that I expect you to read my mind.) I just thought that it would be more civil, if civility can be measured in degrees. Perhaps I should have used the word polite. At any rate, thanks for the dialogue. Cheers. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image script

I'm done with the image script that you requested at WP:US. I hope you still want it! It's located at User:Gracenotes/wpPicmark.js. To experience its functionality, add the following to your Special:Mypage/monobook.js:

if (wgNamespaceNumber == 6) importScript('User:Gracenotes/wpPicmark.js');

It works a bit differently than you proposed; and when you click "Submit", it will make an edit. If you notice any bug, or want anything changed, or are a bit confused about the functionality, please contact me and I'll see what I can do. If you could also give me a list of more templates I could add, that would be great as well. Thank you, Gracenotes ^T § 20:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you shouldn't generally accept scripts from strangers, but I'm a relatively long-contributing editor... so hopefully you can trust me. Cheers, Gracenotes ^T § 20:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably that you only need to bypass your cache for changes to take effect. If you're using Firefox, Ctrl + F5 should do it (the script doesn't work in IE, but that's Ctrl + F5). That needs to happen every time any you want part of your monobook.js updated. Hopefully it continues to work :) Gracenotes^T § 20:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SageLeaves.jpg and Image:Tomtheman5-UnknownFlower.jpg

Hi. While going through CAT:CSD, I saw where you had requested to have Image:SageLeaves.jpg and Image:Tomtheman5-UnknownFlower.jpg deleted. Could you elaborate on your reasons for it? Did you personally take these photographs? If so, they are very nice and could be moved to Commons. If it is already on Commons or the licensing information is in error or if there is some other reason to delete it, please revert my removal of the speedy tags. Thanks. --BigDT 01:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish head is dead. Heil new head!

Turkish head Saparmurat is dead. He was very funny man. tr:kullanıcı:kibele —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.122.7.12 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

"Say, Cheese!"

Teddey has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Teddey 04:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceability

Sorry, that's my bad. I misunderstood what "Replaceable?" means. Thanks for letting me know, now I'm going to correct all fair use rationales. Daniil Maslyuk 16:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RydeEsplanadeStation.jpg

Hi Tom,

Sorry about that, I thought Wikipedia counted as non-commercial and so a non-commercial use specified file wouldn't be a problem. Go ahead and delete it (As I just discovered, I can't do this myself), I hope to have a photo I've taken myself in its place relatively soon.

Cheers.

--Peeky44 14:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all a problem. I actually did the same thing myself a few months ago here (and kind of made a fool of myself by making such a fuss about it!). As a sidenote, you can have anything you created/uploaded deleted by an administrator by adding the {{db-author}} tag to the article/image. I'm actually not an admin, so I can't delete anything, but I've already tagged the image, and it'll be taken care of soon. tiZom_(2¢) 14:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for moving Bob Berry

Hi Tom,

I saw you moved Bob. Great. I'm working on the next Bob Berry (from NZ). Might take a couple of days. But I thought it would be better this way. Especially the change of all the links made me a bit nervous. I suppose you use "AWB" for that? Greetings, Dick Bos 10:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer

I appreciate the advice and, judging by your page, you know a thing or two about coding. I really appreciate it! --Eris11 23:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 23:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:City of Cranston RI Seal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:City of Cranston RI Seal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Herseysensin.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Herseysensin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sun!

Yeah, thanks for the sun! :D TheCoffee 01:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, thanks. Probably the easiest one I've done yet, as it was just a cut and paste job from

. :o)

I noticed that you do a lot with the Philippines. I'd love to trace

and

, but I'd need higher-res copies to make a decent SVG. Let me know if you know where I might find them on the web. Thanks! tiZom_(2¢) 05:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually hoping to get Flag of the Philippines to featured status. :-> I wish I knew better sources on where to get those other flags, but those are probably the best ones I've seen. TheCoffee 11:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll hit up the library this weekend, and see if they have anything regarding those flags.

Hey, what do you think about having a series of images highlighting the symbols on the flag. Do you think that would be helpful, or would it be a little overboard? See my sandbox for an example of what I mean... tiZom_(2¢) 19:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah.. haha, nah, but I think that would be a bit too much. Thanks though. :p TheCoffee 14:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A350 Images

So whats the best way to go about this? I think you know more than I do. These are from Boeing press releases. They are given to the media and the public. It is fine to use them. So what should I put them under?--Bangabalunga 05:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and add this to all the images that you're adding. It covers copyright and Fair Use rationale, so it should do the trick:

==Summary==
{{Non-free media rationale
| Description       = Photo of <!--Name and model number--> 
| Source            = <!--website-->, <br/> © [[Boeing]]
| Portion           = 
| Resolution        = Yes
| Purpose           = Depict airplane model
| Replaceability    = Not replaceable <br/>
*It is almost impossible to take a photo of an airplane while in flight
*Airport restrictions prevent photography of airplanes while on ground
| other_information = Fair Use for the following article(s):
* [[<!--Article name-->]]
}}

==Licensing==
{{promotional}}

Be sure to fill out the three fields, as they vary among your images. Let me know if you have any questions. :o) tiZom_(2¢) 06:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Marcus--Bangabalunga 06:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

digits of pi

Hey there. I know it's been a while since you uploaded PiDigits.png, but I was wondering... Do you still have the exact data points that you used for the graph? I'd like to convert it to SVG to ease future editing. Thanks! tiZom_(2¢) 02:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi, here is the original matlab code. good luck and thanks. -mark

a = [1973.5 930
1973.81 1111
1973.95 1210
1974.5 1505
1975.93 4096
1977.3 5050
1978 10000
1979 10625
1980 20013
1981.6 31811
1987.3 40000
1995.2 42195
2005.6 83431
2006.81 100000];

plot (a(:,1),a(:,2),'.-')
axis([1970 2007 0 100001])
box off
xlabel('Year')
ylabel('World Record: Digits of \pi Memorized')

Image sources

Just a friendly reminder to make sure that you include source information (i.e. where you came across the image) when you are uploading media. Otherwise it could get deleted rather quickly (see MarvOwen.jpg and VicSorrell2.jpg). Also, for copyrighted material, please don't upload such large images, as these instances are infringe unnecessarily on the owners' copyrights. Generally, Wikipedia prefers the largest side of the image to be under 300 pixels. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. tiZom_(2¢) 03:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom -- Thank you for your note about image sourcing. The two items you mentioned (MarvOwen and VicSorrell2 are posters from 1935. I purchased them at a baseball memorabilia show several years ago. How should I go about referencing sourcing for something like this? CBL62Cbl62 03:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Say exactly that, under the Summary section. You may want to consider using the {{Information}} template, and just fill in whatever you can:

{{Information
| Description = 
|      Source = 
|        Date = 
|    Location = 
|      Author = 
|  Permission = 
}}

By the way, what do you know about the author of these pictures? They may be in the public domain, depending on when the original author passed away. Public domain in the US is the life of the author + 70 years. You may want to look into that. Until then, you'll need to keep the resolution low. Let me know if I can help with anything. tiZom_(2¢) 04:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Fantastic! I was poking around for such a template, but couldn't find one. I'll start tagging now. Thanks a ton! --fuzzy510 04:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BD logo blue.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:BD logo blue.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I am not the original uploader - I only resized this image. tiZom

Fair use disputed for Image:Loose cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Loose cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:002sonic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:002sonic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 08:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PinkMartiniSympatique.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PinkMartiniSympatique.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β^_command 22:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ForthandtowneLogo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:ForthandtowneLogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RichmondSpiders.png

Thanks for uploading Image:RichmondSpiders.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GMS Logo Green EN.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GMS Logo Green EN.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicommons

Thanks for the tip about setting up a Wikicommons account. I should really do that. Cheers. JPBarrass 14:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once Upon a Christmas (film)

Please refer to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) before moving pages to an incorrect capitalization. Even if the film uses incorrect capitalization, the wiki article name uses the correct capitalization. The article itself, however, is free to use whatever capitalization. SkierRMH 05:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then your spelling of "Once Upon a Christmas" does not follow the convention either, since "upon" is a preposition of less than five letters, and therefore should not be capitalized. I'll leave you to fix it, in case I've missed something. Thank you for pointing out WP:NCF — I'm sure I'll find myself referring to it sometime in the future. tiZom_(2¢) 06:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had to request an admin to do this as the correct capitalization is a redirect w/history. Thanks for the catch - the next run of the capitalization bot would have embarrassed me on my focus on "a" and not all the words in the title :) SkierRMH 06:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:A_Series_of_Unfortunate_Events_Video_Game_PS2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A_Series_of_Unfortunate_Events_Video_Game_PS2.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done tiZom_(2¢) 13:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FCC Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FCC Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done tiZom_(2¢) 18:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Full Circle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Full Circle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I am not the original uploader - I only resized this image. tiZom

Orphaned non-free media (Image:$wingin' Utter$ logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:$wingin' Utter$ logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I am not the original uploader - I only resized this image. tiZom

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CD M People Bizarre Fruit.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CD M People Bizarre Fruit.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Problems

This was indeed a waste of time. I was just going to reply to that and I got an edit conflict. Thanks for removing it. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of my WP edits these days are related to images and copyright law (reducing sizes for Fair Use images, adding tags for missing license info, adding rationales), and so when I saw that nom (especially after having been around for the first failed one), I was a bit wary.

Thanks for keeping an eye on it — it's good to know someone would have caught it if I hadn't. tiZom_(2¢) 22:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SNL32NEWLOGO.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:SNL32NEWLOGO.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I am not the original uploader - I only resized this image. tiZom

Re: furd

That's human error. :-) As you can see from the logs for that image, I deleted two other bad versions, but missed the last one. east.718 at 21:33, March 9, 2008

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cd Jason Mraz Live at Java Joes.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cd Jason Mraz Live at Java Joes.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was used at one point, but another user uploaded another copy. Tom™_(2¢) 02:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Registered Historic Places in Newton, Massachusetts

Hi, Tom, You certainly are the man. Many thanks for your hard work in redoing and adding tables to this list. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks also for your work on individual articles in Newton, adding coordinates, photo requests, etc. clariosophic (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support! Do you think the table format works for these pages? I live in Boston, and I'm planning on taking some photographic bike trips through Boston, Cambridge, Newton, etc. during the spring/summer months. I like the tables, because it allows for images and it is just easier to read overall. Any thoughts? tiZom_(2¢) 22:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I think the tables do work better. Most of the state National Historic Landmark lists are being or have been converted to tables with pictures. The tables would certainly make it easier for someone to plan a trip. Your bike trips sound interesting. I hope you can get some Newton photos. Good luck. clariosophic (talk) 01:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Registered Historic Places in Uxbridge, Massachusetts

Hi, you've really been busy adding tables. It's great. I've cleaned up List of Registered Historic Places in Uxbridge, Massachusetts and it's ready for a table when you have time. Many thanks. clariosophic (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - didn't realize I missed that one! I wrote a Visual Basic program to help convert them to the table format, so this whole process has been relatively easy.

PS - I would say not to worry too much about the red links for the names - eventually, each of these places should have complete articles (a daunting task!) because they're notable by default (I think...). The red links serve as a reminder of what needs to be done :o) The dates, on the other hand, probably shouldn't be linked... there's really no purpose (and of course we're really not supposed to link the same thing more than once in an article). I wanted to remove those links before, but I couldn't fix the program to do it, so I think I'm going to have to do them by hand.....eventually :o) tiZom_(2¢) 15:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your good work. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your message and for doing the table. I'll see what I can do today to add an infobox and enough filler on each one to make them look better. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomtheman5. As you may have noticed, I and some others have revisited all the Massachusetts NRHP list-articles to further refine the tables. I think the system of list-articles is looking pretty good. We added coordinates from the National Register system which are pretty good, too, and often would be helpful in your finding places. I saw elsewhere that you might bike-tour to get pics. Hopefully you can click on the Google map links in the articles and find that helpful in mapping out good bike routes. The coords, though, are not always correct. (In fact, there is a systematic 100 yards or so mislocation in the pre-1985(?) ones for Massachusetts due to a change in mapping systems from old U.S. Geo Svc. quadrant maps to the new system used by Google maps, etc. However, someone else is probably going to provide corrected, exact coords.) Anyhow, I hope you might be re-enthused by recent developments, and may add to the MA NRHP articles and/or chime in at Talk page of List of RHPs in MA. doncram (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sky

Thanks for adding sky to Image:Michelle house American Pie northwest view.JPG. Would you look over these images and add sky as appropriate. Also, please feel free to fix 'em up as you see fit. Thanks. JohnABerring27A (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be honest with you: I'm not that good :o) I get this problem a lot when I take pictures in daylight, and so I've been researching ways to fix the overexposed sky. The three photos I touched up are perfect candidates because there is a high amount of contrast between the sky and the trees (See how dark the trees are?

). All the other pictures have a different kind of tree that lets some light through (See the tree on the left-hand side

), and makes it hard to remove the old sky (If you remove too much, the tree looks like leaves are just floating all around it, and if you don't remove enough, then the branches get a white glow in front of the new blue sky).

I'm still trying to figure out if there are ways to do it, and I'll definitely take a look at the other photos if I can find a good method.

PS - You should open an account at the Commons and upload your images there so that other language wikipedias will have access to your photos directly! tiZom_(2¢) 08:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tom. I ran across this, Category:Images for cleanup, and Category:Images with opaque backgrounds, but none seem to be way to request "sky" be added. I've never used Commons, but I'll give it a try. If you're not already a member, consider joining Wikipedia:Graphic Lab. Thnaks. JohnABerring27A (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I found a place. I posted a request at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab. JohnABerring27A (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LucianaSouzaDuosII.jpg

I have tagged Image:LucianaSouzaDuosII.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Melesse (talk) 04:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added a stub for article Duos II. tiZom_(2¢) 23:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

Hi Tomtheman5, I have found your massage on the image uploaded by me. I am sorry but I have no practice in SVG. What sould I do to save /transform my image to SVG? Thanks for your help in advance. Best regrds from Kohlasz (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and converted it for you (You can find it at Image:FPR-pathway.svg). In the future, I wouldn't worry too much about this tag - there are tons of people here who know how to convert images to a scalable vector format, and that tag just notifies them that your image is a good candidate. However, if you're curious, the program that I used to convert this to SVG is called Inkscape. It's open-source, and you can download it at www.inkscape.org.

As a side note, you may want to consider uploading your free images to the Wikimedia Commons, rather than the English Wikipedia. If you upload it to the Commons, then it is immediately available to each of the 255 Wikipedias out there. I'm here if you have any questions about it, just let me know! tiZom_(2¢) 17:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomtheman5, Thanks for the help and the advices about SVG. Thanks for the suggestion about Wiki Commons. All of my images are uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as far as I know - there is a Chemotaxis chapter in more languages about my images. Best regards from Kohlasz (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Various event templates

A few templates you created, Template:EventRecordBottom, Template:EventRecordRow, Template:EventRecordBronze, Template:EventRecordSilver, Template:EventRecordGold‎, and Template:EventRecordTop‎ , have been marked for deletion as deprecated and orphaned templates. If, after 14 days, there have been no objections, the templates will be deleted. If you wish to object to their deletion, please list your objections here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the templates. If you feel the deletions are appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 01:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If they aren't being used anymore, then by all means, proceed. Thanks for the notice! tiZom_(2¢) 03:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind terribly using the subcategories listed in the template's documentation? The base category is crowded enough as it is, without images that have their own subcategory filling it up further. (At least it's not as bad as the Commons category, though (4800+ images in there at the moment)). Thanks! Stannered (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which way?

I'm torn:

List of Registered Historic Places in Worcester County, Massachusetts

or

List of Registered Historic Places in Providence County, Rhode Island

Which way is best? As you have probably seen, I've been struggling with applying the WP:NRHP format to the NRHP lists in Massachusetts... What do you think? tiZom_(2¢) 15:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom, thanks for your message. I think Bristol County RI would be the ideal, but the problem is numbers with the larger counties. The middle way might be to split out the larger cities & towns into separate lists and combine all the little ones in one county list as you've done in Providence. I like it because then if I want to see all the ones in a particular town, I can click on the City of Town switch button & it will put them in alpha order. In conclusion, I think Providence id the way to go. Best wishes and thanks for all your good work. clariosophic (talk) 15:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesex County list

Hi Tom. Middlesex County looks really great. I'm really happy with the list for Newton, my old home town. The pictures really help. You are to be commended. Thanks and best wishes! clariosophic (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr images

Hey Ron!

Just wanted to let you know that if an image is labeled on Flickr as non-commercial , then Wikipedia can't accept it. To be allowed on WP, an image licensed Creative Commons needs to (a) allow for commercial use, and (b) allow for edits. So basically that limits us to CC-BY and CC-BY-SA . In the past, I've had luck flickr-mailing the user and asking them to change their license on each image that I wanted to put on WP. Hope this helps :o\ Sorry... tiZom_(2¢) 01:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I will check on the images, and if needs be, get in touch with the photographer. Otherwise I will just have to take my own photos next winter when I am over in Portugal myself.

Ron B. Thomson (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joomla logo.png}

Thank you for uploading Image:Joomla logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done ...hate these bots! I only resized this image! :oP Tom™_(2¢) 02:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UBX/diet

User:UBX/diet, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/diet and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/diet during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ultra! 22:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LogoRio2016.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoRio2016.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only resized this image. If it is no longer being used, by all means, delete it. Tom™_(2¢) 00:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SWBellC.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:SWBellC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Svgalbertian (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only resized this image. If it is no longer being used, by all means, delete it. Tom™_(2¢) 00:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese flag

Don't think the five-star flag is a good choice to represent Chinese-language cinema. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sojasee (talk • contribs) 08:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's Chinafilm.png you're talking about, then you should note that I did not design it, I only converted it from the PNG format to SVG. If you're unhappy about it for any reason, feel free to update it. This is, after all, a wiki. Please do let me know if I can help. Tom™_(2¢) 20:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carlton Fisk Retired Number

Hey got a question for you. Shouldn't Carlton Fisk's small retired number infobox that shows when his number was retired use instead of

Sorry, I honestly have no idea. I was not the original author, as noted in the summary on the image page. All I did was convert the image to SVG (and I only chose those number images because I see them frequently walking by Fenway Park!)

If you think it's wrong, feel free to update. Tom™_(2¢) 21:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newton South Lions logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newton South Lions logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

renamed

[4] The Wikimedia Commons has another file with the same name as this file, this file needs to be renamed--Albums (talk) 09:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:002sonic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:002sonic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is still being used under Sonic X. I have removed the extra rationale for Sonic (character). Tom™_(2¢) 22:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Koop (band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Koop (band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Koop (band) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Koop (band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add this content, but it seems as though it's fixed now. Tom™_(2¢) 15:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BronzeMedal-bgwhite.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BronzeMedal-bgwhite.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image not being used, feel free to delete. Added Gold and Silver versions to request. Tom™_(2¢) 15:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marmaduke.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marmaduke.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

isd'd the image, since it has been replaced by a png version. Tom™_(2¢) 15:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cd Jason Mraz The E Minor EP in F.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Cd Jason Mraz The E Minor EP in F.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added db-redundant, since image has been replaced. Tom™_(2¢) 17:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]