User talk:199.104.23.1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --maru (talk) Contribs 19:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Re: your edit to Dennis v. United States—

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Postdlf 21:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Annelid on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. IronChris | (talk) 20:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Edit on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- No Guru 19:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Stem cell controversy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 17:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ohm's law, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ohm's law was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-06T17:11:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Battle of France (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Battle of France. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 18:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Butch Otter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 19:56, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Butch Otter constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gastrointestinal tract has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 19:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Camel racing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 19:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Peel (fruit). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WadeSimMiser (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peel (fruit). Quaeler (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Piracy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Herbert Hoover. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. abf /talk to me/ 16:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Herbert Hoover. abf /talk to me/ 16:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Fire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Schumi555 (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Talk:Jesus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gsp8181 18:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Jesus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 21:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kennewick Man has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 19:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chaucer (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chaucer (disambiguation) was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-09-24T16:44:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Chaucer (disambiguation). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ♠ B.s.n. ♥R.N.contribs 16:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Barack Obama. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 16:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Talk:Barack Obama. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Loonymonkey (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JForget 16:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Horse colic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nasnema  Chat  21:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Precipitation (meteorology) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. GLaDOS (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Earth Hour. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Earth Hour was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) deleting 48844 characters on 2010-01-12T20:47:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Gulf War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Malad City, Idaho has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  16:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Grgich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mike Grgich was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-22T16:25:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Governor's Foreign Language Academies. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Orphan Wiki 16:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Malad City, Idaho. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Orphan Wiki 16:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mime artist. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rainbow table, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Minnetonka Cave has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. LcawteHuggle (talk) 17:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robin Hood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 14:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gay village, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bobbo (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 20:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peru. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moonshine (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 18:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mountain Chickadee, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sharp-tailed Grouse, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sharp-tailed Grouse was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960894 on 2011-11-16T19:46:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Homicidal ideation, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Homicidal ideation was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984977 on 2012-01-03T21:19:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blobfish, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blobfish was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950796 on 2012-03-29T19:01:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Snakehead (fish). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Snakehead (fish) was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958973 on 2012-03-29T19:22:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Blobfish ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lascaux without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jonathanfu (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vicente Huidobro with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vicente Huidobro with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Darkwind (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Duncan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hunting, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 21:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Paul Bunyan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Bunyan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 17:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transformer, you may be blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mongolian nationality law because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mongolian nationality law. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Norway. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --    L o g  X   18:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Daranz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gerasimos Danilatos because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  — daranz [ t ] 17:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Sherman's March to the Sea, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ezra Pound has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Full Faith and Credit Clause has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NickW557. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Israel Kamakawiwoʻole— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick—Contact/Contribs 19:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Newspaper has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Newspaper was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966067 on 2015-09-08T20:37:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Newspaper, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tió de Nadal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Devonson4 (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kerbal Space Program without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerbal Space Program. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kerbal Space Program was changed by 199.104.23.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854551 on 2021-03-08T18:24:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kerbal Space Program, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ed Sullivan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 20:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shirley Temple. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 17:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Idaho—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Floss, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grenada. Dl2000 (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:199.104.23.1&oldid=1147875585"