User talk:2Flows
Welcome message
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome[edit]
|
Messages by vandals
|
---|
yeah so....[edit]just wanted to let you know, im using an unblocked VPN and have a poop tonne of IP addresses, and I am clearly trying to include something in this article, so if you could just stop undoing what i edit, that would be great. I can keep doing this forever and you can't, because you are constrained to one IP address, so if you want to make this easier on yourself, just stop and let me do what i do best :) 198.23.71.99 (talk) 21:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Anon untitled[edit]fuck you idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolololol1243 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC) Welcome to the bitch made page[edit]You a whole bitch idgaf if you block me nigga. It didn't fit in her pussy i 2flows have the smallest dick on earth. ☺☺☺ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobflex (talk • contribs) 00:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC) |
2013
|
---|
thanks[edit]for your work on Trap (music genre), looks a lot better now! filelakeshoe (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC) Re: Lex Luger (producer)[edit]"(producer)" could mean he produces anything, film, TV, not just music. "(record producer)" is more precise on what he does. QuasyBoy (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC) FAC comment[edit]Hi. If it's no bother, would you like to voice your support/oppose and comment at my FA nomination of Confusion (album)? It's a relatively short article to review. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks for improving the article.[edit]The V-Nasty article is looking alot better now. I'm think of withdrawing the AfD with more improvements... LiberatorLX (talk) 04:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Editing on K.E. on the Track page[edit]Thanks for the notification, 2Flows. I am simply including recent work he has cataloged. We have permission to include all new work and correct any misinformation, as well as delete any information he doesn't want to have on the page (i.e. instruments). Thanks so much. --Vanessanderson (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)vanderson |
2014
| ||
---|---|---|
808 Mafia[edit]Looks like there is a lot of beef going on with Southside and some of the other more minor members of 808 Mafia. You might want to check out Southside's twitter feed. TM88 is officially out. Jaye Neutron and more likely J. Moss could be out too. However, Southside did not make any straight up ".... is out of 808" like he did with TM88. A sample of tweets include [1], [2] and [3]. It looks like Jaye Neutron and J.Moss deleted most of the tweets they posted, but it might be too soon to make a call and straight up move them to past members. We know that none of the major sources XXL, The Source, HHDX, etc. are going to be reporting this since they are more minor members of the group. I mean they did not even report TM88 leaving the group, and he was like their third in command. What do you think? STATic message me! 00:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Kanye[edit]Good call. I completely missed seeing them in the body copy. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC) YG (rapper)[edit]I removed the section that I did because it doesn't fit in in the Wikipedia narrative and m.o. Wiki is a platform based on integrity and accuracy. What was mentioned in the section I removed were falsehoods, probably published by vandals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.82.194 (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2014
Talkback[edit]![]() Message added 22:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 22:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC) Can you put two sources [5] [6] (which are says pop ballad) to "Composition" section (next to "... pop ballad;")? Hope it match, but make sure the same link on "References" section in this case. 183.171.177.113 (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer granted[edit]![]() Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
Expedia[edit]Hi 2Flows, I highly value your contributions to Wikipedia, and your copy-editing skills are very accurate. I would like to ask you if you could make edits to the page of Expedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expedia), as there is some information missing from the page. Would you be willing to make edits to the page so that it's complete? The main areas that I think needs more information are the infobox on the top right, and external links. To be specific, I think the infobox at top right needs more information, and fields more in line with other global travel brands like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TripAdvisor, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivago or and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vodafone_Hutchison_Australia. The infobox also needs to change URLs to be within 'website' (at the bottom) rather than 'Web address' (at the top), and it needs to include links to Expedia ccTLD: US, CA, UK, AU & NZ (in that order) in the same shape as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivago In regards to external Links, I think it should link to Expedia ccTLD in the same shape as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TripAdvisor with the same links as on #3. Let me know, I would highly appreciate your assistance in this matter. Erexkiss (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Changes to wording in the White privilege[edit]Hello, I noticed you reverted my change in the introductory sentece of the White privilege page. I explained myself in the Talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_privilege#Proposed_wording_for_opening_sentence Could you please explain your decision to me? I don't see how my change was WP:NOTOPINION considering the fact that following my addition of the word supposedly the introduction also contains words like unspoken and presumed. Thank you ACanadianToker (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC) CSD[edit]Are you sure I Came To Dig is vandalism? It looks like no context to me, as it looks like a good faith creation. Thanks. --Lixxx235 (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bling Ring[edit]I was right 2flows I was right go to the bling ring group wiki gabby nears is not part of it Diana tomayo is so you can stop changing it I did research ass— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinthedemon (talk • contribs) 20:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello 2Flows. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Big T, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes specific claims of importance and content is not overly promotional. Suggest AFD instead. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC) untitled[edit]How you know these people info is what id like to know!? How accurate are you with the sources of the information you getting! ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mssfgiants (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Cary Grant Edit[edit]I removed the last section on Cary Grant's personal life because I consider it slander. I don't see how it it relevant to include, Grant himself denied being gay along with members of his family. Including those accusations about Grant on his page only makes a respected actor look bad. It's basically gossip, so why should it be included? The section I removed is pointless to include on his page since it has been refuted by his family. Its just slander. That is why I removed it. So if you could restore my edits that would be great. Thanks Jgormanart (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Jgormanart (talk)
4chan raid at "The Feminists"[edit]Check at https://boards dot 4chan dot org/b/thread/560978173/69-decides-which-wikipage-we-edit-go for a anonymous mass raid at that article being planned and commenced, cleanup may be required — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 20:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
"The Feminists" article[edit]I feel this article is un-notable and is very biased to matriarchy and is promotional of the organisation, and also I did not see any criticism or any other viewpoints — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 16:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The Feminists[edit]Children could have viewed the innapropriate content the /b/ vandals inserted and they could repeat the information said to someone they know and then they sign a petition to delete Wikipedia for being non-12 year old nub friendly — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrritatingCobalt (talk • contribs) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC) A kitten for you![edit]![]() Kittens are nice IrritatingCobalt (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
The Pinkprint[edit]It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for "The Pink Print" to the "The Pinkprint". Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, "The Pinkprint", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014. Thank you for your time, KaneZolanski (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC). DYK nomination of ILoveMakonnen[edit]
DYK for ILoveMakonnen[edit]
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
create a Page For These 2
[edit]Please Create a page for Producers DJ Spinz and TM88! Please Man! LORD FLOCKA FLACKO (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Rich The Kid for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rich The Kid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich The Kid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Rich The Kid for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rich The Kid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich The Kid (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, 2Flows. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Prodigy of Mobb Deep 2005.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unused photo of unknown subject
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Barong Family for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barong Family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barong Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 06:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, 2Flows. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jae Millz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jae Millz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 04:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, 2Flows. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, 2Flows. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Young Breed has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
"Black Bruce Wayne" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black Bruce Wayne. Since you had some involvement with the Black Bruce Wayne redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Widefox; talk 17:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)