User talk:Ainsley Louis I. Mallari

Welcome!

Hello, Ainsley Louis I. Mallari, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as TheoTown, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kostas20142 (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TheoTown

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on TheoTown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kostas20142 (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TheoTown

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, TheoTown, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NasssaNser 11:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Address Downtown Dubai have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Burj Khalifa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burj Khalifa, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Burj Khalifa was changed by Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899455 on 2016-09-10T13:34:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sky City (Changsha). —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuo-West Tokyo (Approved) Station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Chuo-West Tokyo (Approved) Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gronk Oz (talk) 14:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (talk) 03:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason given. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Decline The Begin Construction

September 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Existing: 2016 - Present

A better venue...

Hello, Ainsley Louis I. Mallari, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Tagalog; did you know there is a Tagalog Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Ibadibam (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mabuhay, Ainsley Louis I. Mallari, at maligayang pagdating sa Wikipedia! Bagaman ang mga pagsusumikap upang mapabuti ang Wikipedia ay palaging kalugud-lugod, sa kasamaang palad, hindi nakasulat ang mga ambag mo sa sapat na antas ng Ingles upang maging nagagamit. Tila mas bihasa ka sa Tagalog; alam mo ba na mayroon nang isang Wikipediang Tagalog? Maaaring mas naisin mong mag-ambag doon kaysa rito. Sa anumang kaso, maligayang pagdating sa proyektong ito, at salamat sa iyong mga pagpupunyagi! Ibadibam (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Circuit Tarlac

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Circuit Tarlac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 03:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cobikeyhinthint

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cobikeyhinthint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SYSS Mouse (talk) 04:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vigan Connector Expressway

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vigan Connector Expressway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

January 2017

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Susannah Mushatt Jones have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I am One of Many (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jacque Fresco. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mummy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Wavehunter (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Empire State Building. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Rivertorch^FIRE _WATER 16:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Poverty in the Philippines has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. --Wavehunter (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Misao Okawa. Jim1138 (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...and this edit and this one. Reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Certes (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Ainsley Louis I. Mallari|Ainsley Louis I. Mallari]] ([[User talk:Ainsley Louis I. Mallari#top|talk]]) 12:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (talk) 12:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You made twounblock requests, neither of which gave any reason to believe your block is invalid. Yamla (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblocked to Much Ainsley Louis I. Mallari (talk) 06:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you appear to be incapable of communicating in comprehensible English, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. I suggest you stick to the Wikipedia in your native language. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]