User talk:Alexisajet

Welcome!

Hello, Alexisajet, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as My Big Fat Greek Wedding (franchise), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MensanDeltiologist (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of My Big Fat Greek Wedding (franchise)

The article My Big Fat Greek Wedding (franchise) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary. I can’t imagine anything that can be added that isn’t covered in the referenced articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Annie (film franchise)

The article Annie (film franchise) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

These are covered at Annie. It's not a film franchise anyway, since the films and plays are remakes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 22:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annie (film franchise) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie (film franchise) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie (film franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 01:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from My Big Fat Greek Wedding into My Big Fat Greek Wedding (franchise). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Big Fat Greek Wedding (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating empty setions

Please do not create sections and leave them empty as you did here and here. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mr. Cartoon does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 19:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jule Huffman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huntington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced stubs

Hi, can you please add references to the stubs you are creating? Mass creation of unsourced stubs is not a good idea. You can find instructions at WP:REF. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 19:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walt Disney Limited Issues

Hello Alexisajet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Walt Disney Limited Issues for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Disney Golden Age

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Disney Golden Age you included material from the Disney Wiki. It's okay to copy from there, as it's a compatibly licensed wiki, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Please see Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Copying material from free sources for more inflorantion on this topic. This particular content is not suitable for our encyclopedia, because it's completely unsourced opinion. I have removed your addition and redirected the page to The Walt Disney Company article. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.★Trekker (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Snidester. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Cat in the Hat (Film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Vault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Alexisajet, thanks for creating List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeff White (actor)

The article Jeff White (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeff White (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff White (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff White (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeff White (actor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carter and Sawbones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Schemer Presents!

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Schemer Presents! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Shining Time Station characters

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Alexisajet, thanks for creating List of Shining Time Station characters!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material from http://shiningtimestation.wikia.com/wiki/ to Wikipedia, especially without the legally required attribution. Wikia content is not suited to a serious encyclopedia and shouldn't be added to our articles. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HI Alexisajet, do you have any reliable sources for the information or would it be better to work on it in draftspace? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication

Hi Alexisajet, can you please start replying to my messages. Refusing to respond to other editors is disruptive editing, please see WP:DISPUTE as well as WP:Communication is required. WP:V is also at the heart of Wikipedia, but you have created several unreferenced articles, including Schemer Presents!. Please respond and add reliable sources. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are now risking a block by refusing to respond to messages and by not addressing the issues. If you do not respond, this will go to WP:ANI. I am trying to help you and work together - please help me to do that by responding. Boleyn (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored five messages over weeks; communication is a matter of policy, as outlined at WP:DISPUTE and WP:CONDUCT. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schemer Presents!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your addition to List of Shining Time Station characters has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have unfortunately had to block your account indefinitely due to your refusal to communicate or to address the above-mentioned issues. Regards, Swarm ♠ 02:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please unblock me! I WON'T do ANY disruptive editing EVER again! Alexisajet (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexisajet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I want to edit more and create pages

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters

The article List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no in-line citations; only sources are the films themselves, so this seems to be first-hand interpretation from the article's creator

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Popoki35 (talk) 13:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of My Big Fat Greek Wedding characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paradoctor (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]