User talk:Critikal1

Welcome!

Hello, Critikal1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --PaxEquilibrium 09:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not

....remove parts of articles. It is considered vandalism as per WP:VAND. Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 10:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not commit personal attacks against users. Wikipedia has a zero tolerance policy.

Also, please read carefully the following: WP:NPA, WP:VAND (to understand the meaning of vandalism) and especially WP:NOT. Thank you.

The up is the reason why I reverted your edits. --PaxEquilibrium 23:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making personal attacks like you did here. It is prohibited and may result in prevention from editing.

Personal attacks and racist remarks (ethnic slurs, derogatory terms) are strictly banned. Consider this your last warning. --PaxEquilibrium 21:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

As per your requests, I have given details over at Talk:House of Balšić and Talk:House of Crnojević.

Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 12:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked for 24 hours constantly disregarding WP:NPA and WP:CIV. Please understand that such behaviour is not tolerated in wikipedia, and when the block expires you are invited to avoid the breaches of policy that brought you to being blocked.--Aldux 23:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous personal attacks

Please do not make edits such as these. Such derogatory terms are ethnic slurs or racist remarks, and making them is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. This is exactly why you were temporary blocked from editing the Wikipedia. In order to evade such problems, please refer to WP:NPA & WP:CIVIL. Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 19:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Montenegrins. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Duja► 12:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for 48 hours for violating the WP:3RR at Montenegrins. After the block expires you may return, but avoid the behaviour that has brought to your block.--Aldux 14:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not behaving wisely, Critikal. I had told you expressly that you could restart editing after the block expires, and not a moment before: sockpuppetry by blocked editors is not tolerated. Thus your is brought to 96 hours. And keep this in mind: further sockpuppetry will only obtain longer blocks.--Aldux 18:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule on Montenegrin cap, coming off a recent block for a period of forty-eight hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 14:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More edit-warring

I see you're back to revert-warring at articles related to Montenegro. You don't need to revert four times within a period of twenty-four hours to be considered disruptive (and blocked). Please stop. -- tariqabjotu 02:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for persistent edit-warring on articles related to Montenegro for a period of forty-eight hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 11:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism (again)

Critika1, please start paying attention to your own talk page when I warn you (for numerous times) what vandalism is. See WP:VAND. You are removing content based on bad faith, which means that you are conducting vandalism. Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium

License tagging for Image:Montenegrins112.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Montenegrins112.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Montenegrins111.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Montenegrins111.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lompar

Will you be adding entries for Petar Lompar and Andrija Lompar? Otherwise Lompar is an unecessary page. --NeilN 23:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will if he won't. --Prevalis 01:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critikal1 has retired, people. --PaxEquilibrium 19:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Montenegrin hip hop musicians

I have nominated List of Montenegrin hip hop musicians, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Montenegrin hip hop musicians. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bananaqueen (talk) 00:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Critikal1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 709 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Nina Stanišić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Knez Mutimir.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Knez Mutimir.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Knez Caslav.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Knez Caslav.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ratko Đokić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Serbian neighborhoods

Hi, I'm Dom497. Critikal1, thanks for creating List of Serbian neighborhoods!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article is good, just that the references aren't written in the proper way. Please see the tag at the top of the article for more info. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Serbian neighborhoods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Logan Square, Eatonville, Albany Park and Irving Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ottakring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

Ugljevik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Names of the Serbs and Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vlah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turbo-folk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ceca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivan Strez Balšić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbian epic poetry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hague Tribunal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deni Boneštaj

Hello, I've been trying to work on this article, which you created years ago. It's been tagged for WP:NOTABILITY for nearly 6 years, so it could end up deleted. I'm trying to establish notability, but I'm struggling to find any reliable sources (at least any I can read!) If you have the time, please look it over and see if you have any suggestions. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kosovo Myth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbian American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Peković

Please stop with disruptive editing, claiming he is a Serbian when he clearly is not. He is born in Bar, SFRY (now-days Montenegro), plays for Montenegrin national team and declaring himself as Montenegrin. Him having maybe some roots in Serbia, or just liking Serbia and Partizan Belgrade doesn't make him a Serbian. You can't say so with adding tabloid news, and claiming so based on his tattoos and unproven references. All major basketball sites (NBA, Euroleague etc.) claim he is a Montenegrin. That what you are doing is called nationalism. Don't think I wouldn't like to he represent Serbia at international level and him being a Serb, I am of Serbian nationality either. But that is just not the case. He is a Montenegrin. Talk on my page before continuing with edit war on Nikola Pekovic article. Bye. --AirWolf (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He was born in Bijelo Polje. Being a Serb has nothing to do with being from Serbia, as Serbs are indigenous to all of the Ex-Yugoslavian countries (except Slovenia). The references are many, his tattoo with a Serbian cross, a tattoo on his leg of the Battle of Kosovo, and him doing the Serbian Three-finger salute with teammates. He is Montenegrin by citizenship, Serb by ethnicity. I will undo your edit on the page, until you provide evidence that he is not of Serbian ethnicity. Critikal1 (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you just write is he is a Montenegrin of Serb ethnicity. Evidences are many, no need to provide you. As of now, you are reported to administrators. AirWolf (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change it here freak.[1], [2]AirWolf (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critikal1: It might help to step back and pursue dispute resolution. You've been here long enough to know that edit warring is not allowed. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 00:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbs in Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbian American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All the Right Moves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fried chicken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

Serbian American Museum St. Sava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Serbian American Museum St. Sava) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Serbian American Museum St. Sava, Critikal1!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article! Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Serbian American Museum St. Sava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serbian American Museum St. Sava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian American Museum St. Sava until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Serbian National Defense Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Serbian and FARA

Cheta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

Wendish Quarter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sorbian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbenda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Serbian American Museum St. Sava Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Serbian American Museum St. Sava Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Triestine Serbs page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Triestine Serbs

added links pointing to Serbian, Ottoman and Liberal-National Party

Boris Nayfeld

added a link pointing to Russian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deni Boneštaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deni Boneštaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deni Boneštaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tunglo

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Critikal1, thanks for creating Tunglo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Milosh vojinovic

A tag has been placed on Milosh vojinovic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Pink Panthers Gang.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pink Panthers Gang.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raška architectural school, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slavic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Critikal1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MontenegroWiki 2.0 ?

Pošto vidim da si još uvijek s nama, možda ćeš biti zainteresovan s novijem projektom koji sam započeo sad skoro... Treba mi dosta pomoći, pa se tebi obraćam. Ako si zainteresovan, uđi pa udri!

http://www.montenegrowiki.me

--Birziminium (talk) 04:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Critikal1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nina Stanišić

The article Nina Stanišić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Per the talk page discussion, no sources are available and some editors were even in doubt that the pageant she supposedly won in 2001 even existed then. Even if it did, it's the definition of BLP1E.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hora (dance), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Critikal1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Critikal1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Serbenda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serbenda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbenda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Famous Serbs.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Famous Serbs.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]