User talk:Asrieltheoracle

Welcome...

Hello, DanielJWilde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 07:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Izno. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Izno (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Izno, I apologise. This was an accident. I was trying to figure out how italics work on Wikipedia. DanJWilde (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Eustace Baker moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Francis Eustace Baker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F Stimson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert F Stimson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Our West Lancashire/meta/color

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Our West Lancashire/meta/color, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 13:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Eustace Baker has been accepted

Francis Eustace Baker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of MPs elected in the 2001 United Kingdom general election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Martin and John Reid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skelmersdale Independent Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skelmersdale Independent Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skelmersdale Independent Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb _words^deeds 19:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Shadowing" parameters

There has been widespread consensus that "Shadowing" parameters should not be in infoboxes since infoboxes are supposed to be concise. Alex (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex B4: Where is this consensus? DanJWilde (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex B4: If I can confirm that there has been a consensus than I'd be happy to revert all of the edits that I made, however I will only do so if I can see first hand that there has been "widespread consensus". I'd also like to contribute to this consensus as I felt as if the "Shadowing" parameter is in the spirit of what infoboxes exist for, to be used for "quickly checking facts" (see Help:Infobox). It is also there for more or less the same reason as why the 'Prime Minister' parameter is there for Keir Starmer's infobox. DanJWilde (talk) 16:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I should clarify I have only seen this discussion unfold in the forms of edits and summaries but nevertheless, as per norm, the onus on consensus will be on you as the one seeking the change. Maybe take it to arbitration?

@Member1494: Also maybe worth discussing this with each other since you seem to advocate different positions on this. Alex (talk) 04:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex B4: @Member1494: I apologise for taking such a long time to respond. I would be happy to take this through to arbitration if I knew how to do that. DanJWilde (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well for now I am going to revert per policy on seeking consensus. Alex (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We should have the Shadowing parameters in the Infoboxes.

Ciaran.london (talk) 04:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex B4: @DanJWilde: having shadowing specially infers that there is a specific relationship between the two, given the shadow cabinet is appointed by LoTO and has little reference as to who their corresponding SoS is. If this is something that should be included I think it’d make most sense in the lists of office holders pages. Info boxes become rapidly cluttered and cease to function as a career history. I would be quite keen on the roles being collapsed boxes with the detail hidden away (this could allow the info box sections to include more information without becoming needlessly long) Member1494 (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prime Minister of the Cook Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Presidential transition of Joe Biden. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Cliffmore (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cliffmore Hello, which edit did I make which was unconstructive? I'll be more than happy to make any amends necessary if you point me in the right direction. It absolutely was not my intention and I apologise for any problems I may have caused. KR, DanJWilde (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DanJWilde No worries. Your 13:25, 17 December 2020‎ edit of Presidential transition of Joe Biden is considered disruptive because you significantly changed the structure and content of the article without first consulting the talk section. Cliffmore (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cliffmore Ah right, thank you for letting me know. I will make sure not to do this in future. DanJWilde (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timothy Paul Blodgett

The article Timothy Paul Blodgett has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ... discospinster _talk 16:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert F Stimson

Hello, DanJWilde. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert F Stimson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert F Stimson has been accepted

Robert F Stimson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Lebus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Simon Lebus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve seen shorter and less “notable” articles with fewer citations than this remain published. Why has this decision been made with this article in particular? How many citations and how long does the article need to be to remain published? How do I appeal this decision? DanJWilde (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Lebus (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Lebus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Lebus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DanJWilde! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Skelmersdale Independent Party

Hello, DanJWilde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Skelmersdale Independent Party, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susan McKee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Susan McKee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 11:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Lebus

Hello, DanielJWilde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Lebus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trumpism

In this edit you seem to have added a footnote citing an article in the Independent without adding the citation information to the bibliography (or, alternatively, you've cited one of the pieces in the Independent that are listed, but given the wrong date – but that seems less likely). As such the article currently gives the publication and date for the claims about Johnson, Farage and Galloway, but no other information. Could you have a look and, ideally, add the full citation to the relevant section? Or let me know if I've missed something obvious. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arms & Hearts Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention. The article which I cited was this one, and it is more than likely a careless error on my part as to why the citation information wasn't added - I'm sorry about that. I am unfamiliar with the format of the current citation in this part of the article in that they are all grouped together. I'm wondering if you could point me to a guide so I can add all necessary information? Kind regards, DanielJWilde (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I've gone ahead and added it – the citation style is indeed a bit idiosyncratic so it seemed more straightforward. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arms & Hearts Ah, thank you very much. Apologies once again. DanielJWilde (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

James Bell (trade unionist)

added a link pointing to Francis Blundell

Stephen King-Hall

added a link pointing to Blackheath

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West Lancashire Borough Council logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West Lancashire Borough Council logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Downing Street Chief of Staff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mark Fullbrook

Hello, Asrieltheoracle,

Thank you for creating Mark Fullbrook.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

LinkedIn is not a reliable source

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 12:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashley Dalton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Dalton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Dalton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Asrieltheoracle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ashley Dalton, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

When creating this article you included her date of birth, although this does not seem to appear in any of the sources you cited. This suggests that you may be a friend, family member or other close associate of the subject. I have removed the information, because unsourced information about living people is not allowed and in particular exact dates of birth of living people are not included, for privacy reasons, unless they are widely available in reliable published sources or in sources over which the subject has control - see WP:BLPPRIVACY. PamD 09:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PamD Hello, thank you for your message. I have no association whatsoever with Dalton. The date of birth appears in a right-hand panel when googling her name. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 20:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That Google box really isn't what we can accept as a "Reliable source" - at present it is probably there because it picked it up from Wikipedia, where you'd added it. Or are you saying that you found the date in that box yourself? Either way, it's not a source we can use. Living people's birth dates are sensitive information. Googling around may well find some newspaper article referring to her as "aged 50" in which case we can infer the approx year of her birth as "1972 or 1973", but without that we just leave it out. PamD 20:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Asrieltheoracle. Thank you for your work on Liam Booth-Smith. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Corin Robertson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corin Robertson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corin Robertson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced blp data

I've removed Ashley Dalton's date of birth and number of children as you didn't provide a source for this personal data about a living person. Please replace that content if you can add an Independent published reliable source (bearing in mind that primary sources like Companies House records should not be used). Thanks. PamD 08:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see we went through this a few months ago, see above. Please do not add unreferenced content about living people. PamD 09:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PamD Dalton's date of birth was clearly referenced. Can you please point me to the policy which suggests that Companies House should not be used? Otherwise, it seems counterintuitive to continually remove my edits when Dalton's date of birth is available online and published by a reliable source. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BLPPRIMARY. PamD 12:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graeme Casley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graeme Casley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graeme Casley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AryKun (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Omar Tchiani

Hello Asrieltheoracle,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wikieditor019, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Omar Tchiani, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Abdourahamane Tchiani. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wikieditor019}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 11:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Liam Booth-Smith.png

Thanks for uploading File:Liam Booth-Smith.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tomlinson Photo

Hi, I originally undid your edit on Michael Tomlinson because I thought the other photo was better. However, that's only my opinion, and I didn't realise that the one you added is newer. Sorry about that. Ellwat (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no worries. :) Asrieltheoracle (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Green Party of England and Wales parliamentarians moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Green Party of England and Wales parliamentarians. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 06:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kate Airey

The article Kate Airey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO. Reads like a CV. Lacking secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]