Jump to content

User talk:DavidAnstiss/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 3    Archive 4   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  ... (up to 100)


(January 2018 - May 2021)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Guys and Balls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Andreas Schmidt
List of LGBT-related films of 2004 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Andreas Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dietmar Bär (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Filipino
Maxim Gorki Theater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Three Sisters

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mullins reference on Coming Out article

Hello, thank you for adding the Mullins reference on the article Coming Out (1989 film). I notice that it is a book about painting, not film. Does it actually say anything about the film being shot in the home of one of the Bisky family, which was the claim that needed verifying, or does it just make a passing mention of Norbert Bisky's painting?10:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Felixkrater (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthias Freihof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prom Queen: The Marc Hall Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Fedtschenko

If his birth date was 27 December 1872 (Gregorian) in Leipzig, then it was 15 December 1872 according to the Russian calendar of that time (Julian). If it was 27 December 1872 (Julian) in Russia, then it was 8 January 1873 (Gregorian) in Leipzig.

from User:Burzuchius

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you so much for correcting my mistake. Sc2353 (talk) 23:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add Audiences scores

Please note that Audiences scores are not a reliable source and are user generated content the same as any other web poll, and are not allowed. (IMDB user votes also not allowed.)

I hope you have already learned not to add audiences scores but I notice as recently as February 2019 you added Rotten Tomatoes audience scores to an article. It is great that you are expanding articles with proper review information but please avoid adding audiences scores if you aren't already doing so. -- 109.79.161.229 (talk) 00:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Film lists

Please note that the "cast" column in a film list, such as List of LGBT-related films of 2004, is not supposed to contain a complete list of every single person who was in each film at all; it is only supposed to name the two, three or four people who are the film's primary stars. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheRichest.com as a source

Hi DavidAnstiss. I noticed that you used [1] therichest.com as a source for biographical information in Annie Sprinkle. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that therichest.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of LGBT-related films of 2009 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Gabriel Romero

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of LGBT-related films of 2009, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of LGBT-related films of 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brian Goodman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sal
Ronna and Beverly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Showtime

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Elipongo/SmileyAward

In the interest of promoting good cheer and bonhomie, you are hereby granted the coveted:
Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

WildChild300Talk 19:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formis

Dear DavidAnstiss, could you please point to a reliable source that identifies formis as a single word. It is actually the form of forma in compounds, but then we have to write -formis [with hyphen] instead. But the source does not use a hyphen to indicate that it is not single word and the source additionally omits to identify those words [...] as Latin, while the Wiki-lemma states that the source would indicate that cuniculus and formis are Latin terms. And why would this site be a reliable source for providing etymology? Wimpus (talk) 10:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-formis DavidAnstiss (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is actually not a word, but a word forming element and written with a hyphen. Etymologically, that is a fundamental difference. So, techinically your edit is still incorrect. And by the way, Wiktionary is not a reliable source: A wiki-based dictionary that anyone can edit without editorial oversight is not reliable, and that includes Wiktionary. Wimpus (talk) 21:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And please check Iris filifolia, where you have stated: Filifolia comes from the Greek words, 'fili' meaning thread-like and 'folia' meaning leaf It is actually Latin and fili is again not a separate word and folia is not the nominative singular. Or are these errors really in Stearn's work?  Wimpus (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DavidAnstiss, could you please recheck Stearn. Fili is not a separate word and folia is not the nominative singular. It seems that you are misinterpreting your source. Wimpus (talk) 23:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rock hudson tv movie.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rock hudson tv movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Walk a mile in my Prada.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rock hudson tv movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rock hudson tv movie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Importance (re)assessments

It has been agreed to by the editors at WP:Wikiproject Plants that if a species is in cultivation, it should not be Importance-assessed as 'Low'. They should be 'Mid', and if they get more than 100 pageviews a day, consideration should be given to to assessing them as 'High'. I have been reassessing as many as I can, but if you want to take a look at some of the articles you have worked on and reassess them, that would be helpful. Abductive (reasoning) 16:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great diving beetle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Iris lortetii

Hello! Your submission of Iris lortetii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Freekee (talk) 04:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DavidAnstiss, there is a further issue noted on the nomination. Please stop by at your earliest convenience. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's been another two and a half weeks without any response; if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination, we need to hear from you very soon. Thank you for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DavidAnstiss, I'm afraid your time has run out. If you haven't posted to the nomination within 24 hours, it will be marked for closure. I do hope we hear from you before the nomination closes. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleome hassleriana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Citronella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden samphire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baleares (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crocus nudiflorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Britain
Crocus vernus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Britain

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Craterostigma

I created a stub for Craterostigma, then found your draft on Craterostigma plantagineum. Abductive (reasoning) 07:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will try and finish off the article and publish it (move it from User pages!) 13:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Completed the article !! DavidAnstiss (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Iris meda (plant).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Iris meda (plant).jpg, which you've attributed to Milan Blazek. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norbert Smith: A Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Simon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.ibraaz.org/news/156, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for spotting that, I had copied and pasted originally, and the started re-arranging items and forgot to re-word those sections once I had the other notes in place. Have added better worded notes, now.DavidAnstiss (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Henriques Image.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Henriques Image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE

Hi there, I gave you IPBE for the next year. Let me know if you have any questions --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 00:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much. Now I can finish my last 5 iris articles I have started writing!!DavidAnstiss (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


New Articles

For /Gutenbergia rueppellii, you should consider putting it in a sandbox or in your user space if it's not ready. Moving it around in the visible namespace isn't helping. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, it was meant to be in my user space. How do I put it into either user space or sandbox ? 22:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexandra Gilbreath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monarch of the Glen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natalie Roles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alive and Kicking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael J. Shannon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goodnight Sweetheart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reticulata irises

Hi, I note that you thanked me for an edit related to reticulata irises, and that you've created and edited quite a few Iris articles. The cultivars belonging to the Reticulata horticultural group seem to be rather randomly spread over a number of articles. Iris reticulata has 'Katharine Hodgkin', for example, which is generally accepted to be a hybrid. Iris histrioides also lists it, plus 'George', which sources suggest is a cultivar of I. reticulata. An article in The Plantsman (March 2016) discusses some other species it says were used in creating cultivars. So I'm wondering whether a separate article as something like "Iris Reticulata Group" or "Reticulata iris" might not be better. What do you think? Peter coxhead (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert but I agree about the random spread of articles, I prefer the Group title as it seems to cover more species and has been used before.DavidAnstiss (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Are you interested in sorting this? Otherwise I'll add it to my to-do list. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have the time but my internet usage is a bit sporadic at the moment. Otherwise I would do so. I could help in small stages if that helps.DavidAnstiss (talk) 00:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maurice Hines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Cotton Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gangster World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Edwards.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Mortelliti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tulipa kaufmanniana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratification.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catalpa fargesii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corolla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Binham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iconoclasts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

re Gutenbergia rueppellii

Hello DA, hope you and yours are well. I have made 2 changes to the article, one was using POWO to update distribution, the other was the same source updating synonyms. So why this note on your talk page? I noticed that you used The Plant List as source for name and synonyms. TPL now states that it is out of date and not to be used, they prefer you to use World Flora Online. I find that the sister POWO site replicates and presents better the same data. Keep up the good work. Brunswicknic (talk) 14:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the changes. I was so used to using Plantlist (especially for all my iris articles), I forget that it is now superceded !!DavidAnstiss (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidAnstiss/Archive_4&oldid=1023016688"