Jump to content

User talk:EMP/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, Early morning person, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

A More Perfect Onion

Happy editing! A More Perfect Onion (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Merry yellow

Hi, I was wondering, are you related to the account Merry yellow? Off2riorob (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Hello, No, no relation to M.Y.--Early morning person (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anne Teedham thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for referring me to this page. I just got around to looking at it today, and noticed, to my surprise, that I had been accused of being a sockpuppet! I also noted that shortly after I was cleared of that accusation by administrator Alison.--Early morning person (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Here is the URL to the page stating that I have been cleared of the accusation of misconduct just mentioned: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Anne_Teedham/Archive

--Early morning person (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Request for Comment

Hi Early, thanks for responding to my Request For Comment post on the Chris Moneymaker article. You seem like a good editor who is balanced and knowledgeable. I think it is traditional that when you respond to an RfC that you ID your self on the talk page by beginning your comment with: "Reply to RfC" in bold. This let's people know how you go there. I can't seem to locate the link for this procedure, but I know I've seen it. You can see other editors did this for example at the bottom of this talk page thread:[1]. Anyway its not a a big deal, but just thought I'd mention it in case you didn't know about this. Also, there are some follow up comments on the MoneyMaker talk page RfC and if you have any desire to follow up and respond to other editors comments, I encourage you to do so by clicking here: [2]. Thanks!-- — Kbob • Talk • 01:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Xmas to you

Very best wishes for xmas and for 2010.
I appreciate your comment on my talkpage, best regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Signing your name

Hi EMP, just a small formatting point I thought I'd mention. I see you have adopted our Wiki practice of using colons to stagger our comments on the talk pages. That's great. However, the signature should be placed immediately after the last word of your post instead of placing it on the next line with more colons in front of it. Sometimes when you do this it creates confusion about who said what because the signature is a line a way from the talk. I have corrected a few of your prior posts to avoid this confusion in formatting but hopefully now, you will adopt this more correct and less confusing format of placing your signature at the end of your last sentence like this.-- — Kbob • Talk • 04:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Incorrect way to sign your post.

-- — Kbob • Talk • 04:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Reception section

I was not happy with the previous Reception section because some of the content seemed too arbitrary and the useful content seemed to fit better worked into the Career section, such as the sales. I felt removing it was not controversial because Reception section are, in general, not included in biography pages. However, there is no strict rule prohibiting such sections, and the material you have gathered seems substantial and well sourced, enough to merit a separate section. Good work! Gregcaletta (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Tolle

Hi, you appear to be a fan of Tolle and your additions imo reflect that, please try not to add promotional fluffy expressions, the best is to write in an uninvolved way, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

A little tech. point

Hi Early. A little point that might make editing easier. If you take this, http://indology.info:8106/papers/sundaresan/, and add [ and ], you'll get this [3]...Try it. You'll like it. :o)(olive (talk) 22:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC))

MMY

Please explain your edits to the MMY article. I've started a thread at talk:Maharishi Mahesh Yogi‎#Interaction with The Beatles.   Will Beback  talk  23:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for you response. BTW, it's hard to tell from your username whether you are a male or a female. Should I refer to you as "he" or "she"?   Will Beback  talk  22:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
My guess is that you're female, so I'll refer to you that way. Please let me know if I'm mistaken.   Will Beback  talk  21:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
OK, thanks for clarifying that. I've never come across "Early" as a first name before. ;)   Will Beback  talk  01:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


Archive pages

I've undone your edits to an archived talk page. If you'd like to add material to an archived thread then the best solution would be to move that thread from the archive back to the talk page, unarchiving it, and then add your comment there. Or, start a new thread referencing the archived thread.   Will Beback  talk  22:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI, I've unarchived the thread so now you can re-add your comment to it on the main talk page.   Will Beback  talk  00:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion #5 in the TM article

There is a discussion about the interpretation of suggestion #5 in the TM article. Your input would be appreciated. Edith Sirius Lee (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


Cavaglion

I've left a comment and a request for more information at Talk:Transcendental Meditation technique#Cavaglion about the Cavaglion material you added.   Will Beback  talk  22:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

In response to your alteration I've posted a new question for you.   Will Beback  talk  02:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

References

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Gretzky

I see that you've misspelled "Gretzky" again in your latest edits; you may want to review your changes a bit more closely. isaacl (talk) 22:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

NPOV/NB and Fork

I'd be happy to dig up the refs that document a split of the research content. I've been watching the NPOV discussion and was surprised by the question given the extent of the research as documented in the article and the article's length. However, I'd be happy to try and help with the concern and question on the issue.(olive (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC))

Systematic reviews

You might be interested in the discussion at MEDRS Talk. Maybe you're already aware of it. But if not -- I posted there trying to clarify how one identifies systematic reviews. Also, the review by Paradies came up in the discussion as an example. TimidGuy (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Personal information

I have removed personal information from the MEDRS page. Whether the information is true or not is not the issue. Personal information given out may be an attempt to out you, and is an offense that should be reported, and at the least is harassment . Please check WP:OUTING. If you want content removed permanently you can ask for oversight(olive (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC))

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Congratulations, Early morning person, you recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! In honor of this achievement and all your hard work improving and expanding articles (looks like you put a ton into Wayne Gretzky and Yoga as exercise or alternative medicine, among others), please accept this barnstar.

Thanks again for helping make the world's greatest encyclopedia even better! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

Talkback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Accedie#Hey_thanks's talk page. Accedietalk to me 05:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

Transcendental Meditation

Hi Early Morn, Thanks for your participation over at the TM article! I don't know if you had noticed.... but the area of the lead where you have made recent changes is currently under discussion here. It would be helpful if you could join the discussion and help us reach consensus before making any more changes or additions to that specific section. Thanks again. Peace out!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

You've got a response!

Hello, EMP/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoobAU93 18:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Congrats... You asked an awesome question in the Teahouse!

Hi! Thanks for doing great work developing an article on Yoga and trying your best to protect the article and keep it up to a high standard. Come by the Teahouse again any time with more great questions about your work!


Great Question Badge Great Question Badge
Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum.

There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi t | c 22:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

A minor point

You reached out to someone and indicated that your Wikipedia user name was "EMP"

That person checked with the Wikimedia Foundation to see if you were legitimate. I did assure them that you are legitimate, but I was thrown off momentarily when looking for user:EMP, which doesn't exist.

I think it is good practice to include a Wikipedia user name in correspondence, in fact, while I've done so on occasion, I think I will make it a more regular practice. In addition to my user name, I think I will include a link to my talk page, which will help them if they are willing to communicate there, and will help in case they are wondering if I am legitimate. I urge you to use the full name, so it will be easier to find. Thanks.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, EMP/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Go Phightins! 23:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Tea house response

Hello, EMP/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Your Teahouse question has been answered

Hello, EMP/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Espresso Addict (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Cite book is excellent as a reference template if you reference books a lot. I tend to use the more general citation instead because I like using the same template for all my references, but I think I'm in a minority. In fact you don't need to use any of the citation templates to get the ISBNs to link, just write "ISBN [number]" (eg ISBN 978 0 300 17043 6) and the software does it automatically.

I don't think there's a way of setting which site readers in general get directed to when giving ISBNs; these sorts of special pages usually aim to provide users with as wide a choice as possible. Personally, I find WorldCat the most reliable catalogue, but others might prefer other sites, especially for specialist topics. The links to Google Books can also be very useful for looking to see whether there's any online text available. Happy editing! Espresso Addict (talk) 23:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

Sources

Hi EMP. I've been making a few notes on some of the sources you've added.[4] Several of the sources are excellent, especially the Sedlmeier meta-analysis, which is impeccable. TimidGuy (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

Transcendental Meditation sources

Hi EMP, I've been fleshing out the chart that Zad68 created to review the sources in the article. I notice that you made a request that Zad68 also include in his review some additional sources that were removed, under protest, in March. To facilitate your request I've created a separate table on the talk page so that you could add the sources in question and give any comments you may have about the sources reliability per WP guidelines. I think these tables will be helpful to new editors who come to the page and want to get an overview of what kind of sources are being used in the article. Would you mind filling in the second chart with the deleted sources that you feel should be included in a full review? Or do you have another idea? I'm open to other thoughts on this. Thanks for you input and assistance, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough request. OK, since Zad has other priorities, I'll work on it. A bit busy in my RL, but I think I can get to it sometime this week. EMP (talk 21:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Archive 1
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EMP/Archive_1&oldid=1168300985"