User talk:EditorE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2017[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for personally attacking other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@EditorE: I am not an administrator,but you don't have to request an unblock. I know you are trying to change yourself on Wikipedia, but it says you have been blocked for only 31 hours, and you are not permanently blocked. After 31 hours, you can be free to make Wikipedia edits, just make sure to assume good faith. Spike789 🇺🇸 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Weird Soundcloud) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Weird Soundcloud, EditorE!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks! Reminded me of People Like Us (musician) a bit.

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, @Mduvekot:! Weird Soundcloud is such a fun genre editorEهեইдအ😎 21:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captain Janks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Landers and Century Theater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persona (Lorenzo Senni EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyperreal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Love Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miracle Mile (Starfucker album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative Press (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Ferraro[edit]

Hey to be clear, I think you've done a good job with the Ferraro album articles, I'm just trying to clear up the leads a bit bc they seem a bit all over the place to me, and some of the writing on Ferraro can be hard to summarize in accessible terms. gentlecollapse6 (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Header titles[edit]

"Critical opinion" should be "Critical reception" and "Credits" should be titled "Personnel" in album articles per WP:MOSALBUM. Thanks. --Jennica / talk 23:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

AllMusic italicization[edit]

Hi. Just wanted to tell you that AllMusic does not get italicized. Some publications do, see: WP:ALBUM/SOURCE. Thanks.--Jennica / talk 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Victor Wong 1927.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Victor Wong 1927.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter[edit]

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Exercises (EP)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Exercises (EP), EditorE!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Wow great new article. Very High quality.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere: Eh, honestly i think it could be a little better and I didn't copyedit too much after the finished the article. But thanks. editorEهեইдအ😎 22:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Full Refs[edit]

Infographic for cite web

Please consider switching to full refs. It's way fast anyway. This is to ensure that an bot [or another editor] is able to easily add archive URLs. If you want a tutorial, I can type one up [or even make an image guide]. It's all done within the wiki toolbar and it's easy :) --Jennica / talk 04:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

    • What do you mean by "full refs"? I put all the information of the source that's available in my citations, I just don't use a template. editorEهեইдအ😎 15:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
I guess I do mean the template. Like I previously said, it's to ensure that the links can be easily archived. The way you are doing it now, no bot can archive them as far as I know. I would say it would almost be better to do bare references and run it through reFill versus the current way you do it. I went ahead and made an infographic. It's super easy and auto-fills most of the info needed. I hope you give it a try. :) → --Jennica / talk 01:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
I tested the archive bot out on a page you've done. It can archive them. --Jennica / talk 10:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Yep, I'm aware now. I'll do that from now on. Thanks :) editorEهեইдအ😎 11:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)