User talk:Gavyn Sykes/Archive 3

Momentum {sports}

This article need to be edit is an stub.I start but it does not is much.

RE:

I'll try. First tell me what I should do because I'm not sure what to do with Victory Road (2008). The ppv just ended and something weird has happen. I don't know who won. Read the main event in this.--WillC 03:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll check Shelley's and Sabin's articles. First of all they probably use most of them because if you watch one of their matches they have crap you don't know what is. Hey if you want to know about moves, there is a guy on Youtube called Suicidal Dragon He mainly has Indy videos of wrestlers. Stating their top 10 moves.--WillC 03:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the background for Victory Road. I'm working on it in my sandbox. I'll have the Background and Event GA by Hard Justice.--WillC 03:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion of Talk Pages regarding Tables

Hey there,

I was just thinking, would it be possible to have a template created for the top of the PPV talk pages to try to direct people questioning the tables to the WP:PW talk page? There seems to be at least one person who asks in every talk page (several in NoC I believe) and I'm wondering if this would be a good way to avoid redundant sections on talk pages. Hazardous Matt 16:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards

Hey Gavyn, since you know this stuff better than I do, are Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards notable to include in articles? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'll take your word for it. That's the reason I asked, I didn't feel like checking the archives, since your always working on those types of stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date links

When and where? ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 03:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointed that out. Didn't know it had changed. I appreciate the help. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 04:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back

Thanks for the help. You know I have so many feelings I don't know even how to express them. Just look at my talk page. I've wrote a few things at the bottom trying to express it.--WillC 05:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that "The main feud heading into Hard Justice is between Samoa Joe and Booker T, with the two fighting over the TNA World Heavyweight Championship. At Victory Road, Joe defended the TNA World Heavyweight Championship against Booker T, in Booker T's hometown of Houston, Texas." sounds better than "The main feud heading into Hard Justice is between Samoa Joe and Booker T, with the two fighting over the TNA World Heavyweight Championship. At Victory Road, Joe defended the TNA World Heavyweight Championship against Booker T, in the latter's hometown of Houston, Texas." The second one sounds awkward to me.--WillC 03:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should get another opinion. I just feel reading "against Booker T, the latter's home town." You kind of go who's. After you think for bit you get it but to me it just doesn't go with the flow.--WillC 03:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 16:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Your edits on Ron Killings

I just reverted the edits you made to Ron Killings. Please do not add any info about his WWE return until he returns to WWE tv or is advertised for a return by WWE. There is a promo being shown on this weeks Friday Night Smackdown about his return, so if you would like to readd the information then you are welcome too. Edgehead5150 (talk) 03:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this

Some WWE mark decided to make a useless page. TNA Parodies of WWE.--WillC 03:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just happened to find it because the guy who made it placed in the Total Nonstop Action Wrestling article that TNA makes fun of WWE stars. That is a WWE mark for you. Says crap about TNA but forgets that WWE did the same crap with WCW.--WillC 03:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TNA Parodies of WWE

WillC told me to ask you if the parodies page should have been deleted. Can u give an opinion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckCoke (talk • contribs) 00:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Slam Champions

Hello,

I recently made an edit regarding the Grand Slam Championship for WWE. My edit (under an anonymous server, I wasn't logged in) was regarding potential champions: specifically, champions who require two or more belts, rather than one. It was edited out (by you) since it was not considered notable. Just wondering why you felt that way - my thought was that readers of the article might be interested in ALL potential champions, rather than just those who require one title.

Thanks for your time.

HighlanderV1 (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Per this edit, where was this consensus formed? -- iMatthew _T.C. 02:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Quackenbush

Okay, so I've been editing a lot on this guy & you keep erasing everything I wrote. I don't see what the problem was, how was it vandalism? I checked a ton of sites, including his Official Website & I got everything right. For example, Mike says he only won the FWA Championship 3 times, but you write 4 times. I don't have a Wikipedia account so can you respond through here, please, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.89.160 (talk) 22:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so PART of that edit was legitimate. But you also removed sources, templates, changed the infobox name when it should match the article name and changed headings to have all words capitilzed, which is a WP:MOS violation. If you like, please change the championships to what you believe is accurate, but don't changed the rest of the stuff you have been editing as it is vandalism and/or policy violations. Thanks and happy editing. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 23:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks bro. I thought you were thinking my stuff was inaccurate, but now I realize it was the way I put all the information.

Sure. For more info, try reading WP:MOS, WP:V and WP:RS. Visit the pro wrestling project's talk page if you have anymore questions. :) Gavyn Sykes (talk) 18:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with my edit

I'm just ney guy here. I opened and read about Good Faith but still don't understand since I didn't write it week by week (you said it's week by week play, Hey man we've wrestling event every week which I don't wrote it every but just important match which should write on history)

So please describe me. What should I do? ref it all the time?Pitejung (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My edit on the page of Glen Jacobs with me citing youtube as a source, which I understand is wrong and I'm ok with that, but did that video not show Kane doing a falling powerbomb in attire he hasn't worn since the year 2000 which I've been trying to change from 2002-2003 to 2000-2003. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanenite10 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for welcoming be back. I turn 22 on September 2 (so that's when I will update it). I still won't like the table idea, but I could at least accept it if there was a column indicating how the match was won (pin/submission,etc. and finishing move). Maybe the once column could also indicate who beat who (for tag matches, triple threat matches, etc.). TJ Spyke 16:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 14:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Wikipedia:Peer review/The Great American Bash (2005)/archive1

Hey, can you review The Great American Bash (2005) at it's peer review? Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 17:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats just the name of the page, please put the review on that page. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 17:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sup bro

Hey man just got a couple of questions on the new format. What was the discretion of votes on this? In other words how many supported and how many oppossed. When was the consensus reached? Is there a way we can have it changed back since everyone I have spoken to hates it. Cheers :).JakeDHS07 04:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07[reply]

Championships

The last time I remember any discussion about it, the championships that use the ECW or WWF/WWE acronyms were listed before championships such as the World Heavyweight and World Tag Team Championships. Unless something has changed recently, and granted I haven't been on much of the wrestling articles as of late, titles were always listed:
WWE Championship
WWE Intercontinental Championship
World Heavyweight Championship
World Tag Team Championship.
With the exception of the Batista and John Cena articles, every article I've browsed recently of wrestlers that have won straps that do and don't use the acronyms, namely Triple H Kurt Angle, Shawn Michaels The Undertaker CM Punk, have the ones listed with the acronym first. Not a big deal with me or anything, but I only changed them because, as far back as I can remember, that's how they've always been listed.Odin's Beard (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ref

Well, both work, so it's just a matter of preference. I've always used "cite web" so I probably would change it if I was editing the page. I don't think it matters too much, though I've only ever really seen "cite web" used. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

What are the accepted reliable sources again? I thought WZ was one of them.JakeDHS07 21:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07[reply]

The Man Called Sting

Thank you for backing me up on the sting article. The old sentence wasnt accurate and really not as notable. Also I appologize for the earlier edits on Hard Justic I hadnt realized consensus had changed. I dont agree but ill live with it. Again Thanks!LifeStroke420 (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beer money

Someone else has created the Beer Money article again. It is located here.--WillC 03:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing this article is about to reach notability.--WillC 02:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Format Question

As seen in your edit here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_World_Wrestling_Entertainment_employees&diff=230868058&oldid=230866945 you seem too indicate that the new format does not wikilink stables and tag teams unless they have a team article? If this is the case let me know as this will undoubtably come up in the future most likely resulting in me adding the TNA & WWE roster pages to my watch list. Thnx in advance man. JakeDHS07 19:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hard Justice

Is it just me or has Hard Justice had more people removing the out of universe than anyother article?--WillC 05:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, keep a close eye on Hard Justice. There is alot of IPs trying to remove stuff. I'll be back tomorrow to work on it, so make sure no one screws anything up while I'm gone, if you don't mind.--WillC 04:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your minor edits, which are sometimes over looked on Wikipedia, i.e. reverting vandalism and standardising articles. You deserve this, D.M.N. (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/ChuckCoke

I'd be very thankful if an experienced editor as yourself would reccomend me for adminship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckCoke (talk • contribs) 02:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foley

Gavyn, I just saw this edit and I just wanted to point out that that info was sourced by this. I thought the Sun is considered a reliable source. Is it not, or did you just not see the reference at the end? ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. I actually went to revert it myself about 2 minutes before you 'til I saw the ref. ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: OWOW

Listen, I know where your coming from, but it has been proven not to be "reliable", per Triple H's previous FA. As for CM Punk's article, I have no idea, I don't edit that article. But, his article passed FA, before the FA guidelines became all serious. The only reason I reverted your edits, were because of that reason. I'm trying to abide by the guidelines, because in sometime, I intend to nominate, or someone else from PW, HBK's article for FA. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was gonna tell you about it, cause I admire you as an editor and stuff, but never got a chance to do it, since I'm really busy with other stuff. But, I didn't mean to revert your edits in "mean" way, just that I'm going with the guidelines. Though, I was gonna say to re-add them, but only if you can have a good case on why OWOW is a reliable source to include in the article. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's why I thought too. But, I couldn't find it either for OWOW being a reliable source. I guess its useful for GA's. I do, you go out there and fix links that are broken, revert vandalism, state any other sorts of problems at PW and basically everyone knows what to expect to correct the problem. You admire me? That's freaking awesome, especially coming from you. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True, but just work on articles that interest you, so they have GA potential. As for the PL, maybe this, this, this might help, not sure. But, I don't think it would fail GA, if no info. is found for his PL section. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just did a random Google search on the guy and basically clicked on the links that may have some good "stuff" to add to the article. Yeah, adding a PR might help as well. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, then that might work too. Um, well I know that the "images" have to be reliable, not having images of that belong to the promotions. Like for Edge, there's an image with him stating that he has a MySpace. IDK, that's how I would relate if its reliable. There was a thread on this at PW, I can't find it, but I remember that Nikki commented on this. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ted DiBiase (Jr.)

Ok, but the Jr. should be between brackets. Secretaria) 06:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consider it done. Secretaria) 06:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Surrender

I'm not sure if you watched Impact tonight, but if you did, would you mind to write the background for No Surrender? I didn't get home until after the Nash/Joe vs 3D match and I wasn't paying attention.--WillC 04:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, because I'm not sure if I'll see the replay for it on Saturday. You write it when you can and I'll add the references.--WillC 05:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Event Opening Paragraph

I still fail to see why putting 115 sentences telling everyone reading that wrestling is fake in the opening sentences of a WWE pay-per-view article is necessary? By doing this, you're trying to demean the sport of prefessional wrestling by stating - several times in the opening - that it's scripted, the characters aren't real, the moves are fake, etc. This is arrogant and thoroughly biased against wrestling fans. Anyone reading about a WWE PPV is going to know these facts already; there's no sense in putting them in the opening. All people want to know is the date, results, etc. If anybody wants to know about the complete history of the "fake" professional wrestling, then they can be redirected to the article about it, giving them the exact same information. It does not need to be repeated at the opening of every WWE PPV article.

user:middleeasternfilms —Preceding unsigned comment added by Middleeasternfilms (talk • contribs) 18:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shad Gaspard

Hi, On Shads myspace and in an interview on wwe .com he calls his finishing move THUGNIFICENCE. It’s just a modified big mans STO. It’s spelled different than the character name on the Boondocks, so it must have no connection, and just be plain street slang. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.128.225 (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also he also states in an interview with wwe magazine and on his myspace that he has 2first names, 2 middle names and three last names “Shad Chad Javair Jesus Romen Chittick Gaspard”.

Look on Shads myspace, about his name and move name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.128.225 (talk) 22:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Surrender

Okay, that is good, less to worry about. I believe with what I just removed in Lockdown, it is going to make it to GA. It has nothing to do with the subject but I just removed more than 1,500 letters.--WillC 21:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I miss spelled, "A.B.C.D.", that is what I mean. I'm in the middle of reviewing it right now.--WillC 21:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well I just got done. Your main problem is you haven't written out of universe. Mainly just telling what a match is and the ring names next to their real names haven't been placed in. Plus you have alot of over linking. The rest is just rewording sentences.--WillC 23:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither, I've heard of him before his WWE stuff, but I don't watch ROH. I wish I could but I don't have the money for DVDs. I do have the ability to buy ppvs but I would rather wait for them to get a TV show so that I know what they are like and not lose either 10 or 20 bucks.--WillC 05:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, dude, if anyone removes the stuff on Hard Justice again, then just leave it alone. The more we revert their crap the more they are going to remove it. I'm working on it in my sandbox anyway. As well as Victory Road. So I have everything they remove saved. And after the background is wrote for No Surrender I'm going to make one for it as well. I'm not even going to expand Bound for Glory out in the open. I'm going to write and fix it in my sandbox until the event is over and done with. I'm going for an FA with it and I don't want IPs to screw it up.--WillC 06:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, who removed the out of universe stuff from the background in summerslam? If you know anything about it, the real names are missing. Also, did you see summerslam?--WillC 05:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry man. I believe I might have removed a few references from A.J. Styles and some other stuff you placed in there by mistake. I was working on it and when I went to save we had a edit conflict. So I copy and pasted what I did to your revision thinking it was just small fixes that will get fixed again later. Well you placed a few refs in the in wrestling section. So now they aren't there, but I tried to place them back but only got a few done since I have to go somewhere. Sorry man.--WillC 23:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have a question, well a request, I'm working on something in a sub page, it is a list and I want to make it an FL. I would tell you what it is but I don't want anyone to know I'm working on it until I'm done so I can put it up for a peer review. When I get done with it do you think you can take a look at it and tell me if you think it has a chance at making featured list?--WillC 02:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but do you think you can take a look at it and tell me if you think it reads well, makes sense, and has enough sources? I think I'll be done with it by tomorrow, maybe within the hour.--WillC 03:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, right now I'm working on it. I'll tell you when I'm done in a minute.--WillC 03:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:MySpace

Sometimes you just can't tell. I usually look through the pictures...if there are a bunch of candid shots or a shot of the person with a "this is really me"/"this is really my myspace" sign...that definitely helps. You can use [1] as a guideline, but even they admit that they aren't 100% sure for all of them. Nikki311 03:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Done

Okay great, I will look at the PR again later, once you feel you need a copyedit add the article to the copyedit requests lists.--S_RX 13:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I can't, their are other ppl in front of you, can you add it to the list on my talk page and I'll get to it as soon as I can.--S_RX 22:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: In wrestling

Thanks. Will do. Nikki311 17:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think today is safe to use. Nikki311 02:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Jacobs pictures

Shouldnt we put the picture of kane an taker at the bottom instead of under 1997-1998 section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanenite10 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BP

Show me CONCRETE proof Jerry Lawler has said "Glam Slam" because I TiVo EVERY RAW broadcast ever, and I've never heard Lawler, Ross, or Cole say "Glam Slam"--KingMorpheus (talk) 12:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dirt sheets are not sources they're idle gossip which 75% true, but most of the time they end up with egg on their face. So be wary of choosing dirt sheets such as WON, because Dave Meltzer is NOT the Oracle of professional wrestling.

RE:SS

That's just for the lead, its really no matter since it is later explained in the prose.--S_RX 18:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 22:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WWE roster

Sorry I didn't want the user to have to be put through that. IMO there's no reason that he should have pointed fingers the situation was handeld the thread should have been removed. SteelersFan94 01:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see my point.....or not? SteelersFan94 01:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PR

Done. Now, can you do the same for Unforgiven '05 and if you have time, Judgment Day '05. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll be waiting. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, for the comments. But, I left a question about the lead for Unforgiven in the PR. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Managers

I thought the project had agreed to limit those sections to just managers and valets because enforcers aren't managers in any way, and those sections would be very long for some wrestlers. I know there have been several discussions about it, and most have ended with an agreement that limiting those sections is the best idea. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sacrifice

Hey, everytime I get online and check to see if Sacrifice (2008) is being review for GA, I check out the page. For some reason the poster isn't showing up, and the only pictures I can see that don't have red Xs at the top left corner (like the Sacrifice poster) are the Booker T picture and the Gail Kim picture. I was wondering if the samething is happening to you, could you check it out.--WillC 02:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I was wondering if it was just my end that wasn't displaying the pictures. But they started showing up this morning on my end.--WillC 04:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mikeknox.jpg

you said it always fails, that image I uploaded, but its failing because it isnt in an article! Because of you! Please, leave it in, my images are always taken away because of some dumb reason and I wont let it happen again! Oh and I dont think its fair you get anti-vandalism barnstars since you have a special program that helps you! ..... err --Harvey "Two-Face" Dent (Muhaha!!) 12:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Matt Sydal

I'm sorry, Gavyn, but I simply don't have time. I barely have time to check on my favourite articles, let alone Peer Review one. Again, apologies. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, since my entire future depends on it. ;) Sorry again. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 15:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Taryn Terrell (model)

I Think that My article, Taryn Terrell (model), Should not be Deleted but if you wish to Delete it then You May. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MadManNathan (talk • contribs) 20:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you E-Mail me please? @ "zac1194@gmail.com"

SteelersFan94 22:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Matt Sydal

I'm sorry but I won't be able to complete the copyedit of the above article due to time restraints and per me being busy in real life and my decision to leave Wikipedia in the near future, I'm sorry. :(--S_RX 15:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, per personal reasons on wiki and real life stress and busyness.--S_RX 15:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully, or maybe I just need a need a long wikibreak...S_RX 15:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Scramble

I have no idea. I'm basically doing only because IPs will continually add it if we remove it, so we might as well do it the right way, then see what the official word on WWE.com is. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: FLs

That's a really good question, that I honestly don't have an answer for. I see your point of clogging the tables, and I tend to be of the "lists as the exceptions" mentality. I'm leaning toward keeping the lead and any prose out of universe but leaving the tables alone. I'm not sure what is "right", but that's how I feel right now. Let me think about that for awhile longer. Nikki311 23:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANC

Don't worry the first time I tried to place one up I couldn't get it to work right. It is the system.--WillC 04:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're not an idiot. The template is messed up. Tried it, my request came out all weird. SAVIOR_SELF.777 05:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 14:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Peer Review

Hey Gavyn Sykes, is there any chance that you can comment on the peer review for Armageddon (2006). I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! iMatthew (talk) 19:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I'd be happy to look at Matt Sydal. (Happens to be my favorite new superstar). iMatthew (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup

Although you have not yet participated in a WikiCup, you are receiving this message because I believe it may be something that you might be interested in. Check out the page and sign up if you'd like. I look froward to your response! iMatthew (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PWI

Sorry, it was naive from my part. You can revert it if you want. Secretaria 1:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re:

Yeah, I left about a week ago. There is just too much drama there and we never get much done. I'm doing some new things now, but we'll stay in touch. C'ya round. iMatthew (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Hey Gavyn just checking in

Haven't seen u around in awhile just wanted to see how things are. Also wanted to thank you for helping me through my first couple experiences with the project like the sources and format changes. Cheers. JakeDHS07 05:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey, I haven't seen on that much lately. Whats up?--WillC 03:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gavyn Sykes has also been inactive recently, due to school I believe. No guarantee he will get this soon. iMatthew 03:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, glad to see you are back.--WillC 01:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, You haven't been on lately and it is weird. Hope you fully return soon.--WillC 02:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C

Merry Christmas!--WillC 07:20, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finlay

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the sentence wbw shoved in tfonrt oc ite. Repeat? Don't take this in the wrong way but it's well needing an update. ←Kala jan→ 22:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, I knew about WBW, but I just didn't remember; thought you were writing in brazilian or something. ←Kala jan→ 22:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]