User talk:Lasersharp

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Lasersharp}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome

Hello, Lasersharp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alhutch 06:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FW

Hi Lasersharp, thanks for your contributions on the Concerts section. The night after I'd put it up there, I was thinking of adding something about the full feather headdress (so cute!), but by the morning you'd covered it. What did you mean by the "burnt cheek" look, please? As you can tell, the '98 concerts are a gap in my knowledge! Kind regards, Fayenatic london 22:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone has reverted the character you changed in "tian hou". They only left an IP number; maybe you did it yourself. The original (and reverted) character 後 is the Simplified Chinese character for the same word written 後 in traditional Chinese. I don't know very much Mandarin but am starting to learn a very little! I found a complete list of Simplified characters with Traditional equivalents here but the website is showing the wrong page at the moment -- check back in a few days, as I have reported it to the author. Kind regards, Fayenatic london 23:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note you've been busy on our favourite article today - good work. May I ask why you changed the simplified character to the traditional one within the template:zh-tsl (traditional, simplified, literally) for 天後? If you click on 後 you will see that 后 is the simplified character for the same word. I thought that listing both traditional and simplified would satisfy everyone. The article currently states that the simplified and traditional are the same, which is incorrect. - Fayenatic london (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, I've reverted it now. This was the edit that I was referring to, although the character was then changed a few more times by other editors through the day! Fayenatic london (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's done it again! At least I know now that it's not an edit war if I put it back. As for the Olympic story, I found what I think is a better source, and put that sentence back too. - Fayenatic london (talk) 07:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine. I thought it was odd that sina.com and the one that I quoted both gave CRI as their source, but I could not find the story at CRI - perhaps they withdrew it. The story has been rumoured for a long time (I first read it months ago in French at the Three Divas forum) but perhaps it was nothing more than a rumour. - Fayenatic london (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, do you have a source for your latest edit? By the way, you can link to "Wishing We Last Forever". - Fayenatic (talk) 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Lasersharp (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I were you, I'd give up on the "philanthropist" tag. Although she does good work for charity, it's not what Faye is famous for. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese wikipedia

Hi again, do you use the Chinese wikipedia enough to be able to propose deletion of zh:虹萱 as non-notable, please? I think the English article should be deleted, but the case would be clearer if the Chinese one had been deleted. - Fayenatic london (talk) 17:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not familiar. - Lasersharp (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Chang

Hi, I've created a new article on Phil Chang, based on Google and Babelfish translations of zh:張宇. I'd be grateful if you would take a look and correct anything that I got wrong! By all means add to it if you like. Cheers, Fayenatic london (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not familiar. - Lasersharp (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks on Cape No.7

Hi Lasersharp, thanks for your constant improvement on my edits of Cape No. 7. Your English writing is very good. Should you want to reach me, I'm available at the IP "60.248.60.118", my office desk's IP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.113.8.69 (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.-Lasersharp (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seediq Bale

Hello, I think Seediq Bale the film should be article Seediq Bale and the album should be Seediq Bale (album). Although the film does not begin its production yet, the trailer of the film was released in 2003. ChthoniC's album was inspired by director Wei's 5-minute trailer.--Fauzty (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan's Facebook penetration

According to the source you have provided: "Facebook Inc’s penetration rate in Taiwan is higher than in any other Asian market, said Dan Neary, vice president of the social networking giant’s Asia-Pacific marketing team, who arrived in the country on Tuesday... That figure represents the highest penetration rate in Asia, edging out Hong Kong — with about 58 percent — for the top spot. Facebook’s overall penetration rate in the region at the end of last year was 6.5 percent." The source doesn't state that Taiwan has the highest penetration in the world, it only mentions that within Asia, it has the highest penetration. --benlisquare_T•C•E 03:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have changed the source. Lasersharp (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

318 Taiwan event

Hello, you can vote there to push this event into the news. Yug (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have voted. Lasersharp (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

InFocus phones

Hi Lasersharp

After having the InFocus page open for a couple days, I went to edit it to add mention of its partnership with FIH Mobile.

Lo and behold, I see in the edit box that the info has already been added, with the same source as I intended to use, to boot!

For a second I thought maybe I had typed it and blacked out. Too funny.

Openmikenite (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, cool. Lasersharp (talk) 00:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

LaserSharp, hello,

Could you get involve into this light edit war. I find the point to delete this event quite light:

saying I'am a pro-palestinian pushing palestinian propaganda
saying "it's not a major news".

I on my side think it's both shocking and worth mentioning, since there are there filmed extra-judicial executions of citizens, claimed to be 15 & 17. Cheer, Yug (talk) 12:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong protests

I don't believe I've ever come across another editor like you. I've now "expanded" the section with a holding sentence or two, knowing that you objected to the bare refs. Those were doing no harm yet you refused my the courtesy. Please don't go deleting again now, maybe because it's a short section – there's more to come. Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 07:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen people putting bare links like you've done. Why not add some content along with the refs in the first place? Lasersharp (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Hong Kong Protests

As you were a participant in the move request at Talk:2014 Hong Kong protests, I wanted to inform you that the move has been proposed again and can be found here.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jot

Please read MOS:DAB. Disambiguation entries should have only one navigable link, which should go to a page that actually has information on the entry. Entries should be as short as possible, only just enough to identify the correct page to the reader. Nothing else belongs on the page. SpinningSpark 16:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark II (robot)

The article Mark II (robot) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 16:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Ma–Xi Meeting

Let's make this 2015 Ma–Xi Meeting article as the most complete & comprehensive article to cover the most important meeting in Chinese history ever! hehe .. for sure need to add the handshake photo later. Chongkian (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chou Tzu-yu

Hi Lasersharp, thanks for creating Chou Tzu-yu. I was thinking about starting it yesterday, but you beat me to it. I've nominated the article for DYK, see nomination page. Cheers! -Zanhe (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zanhe, thanks for the feedback. Your various edits have greatly improved the article. Lasersharp (talk) 23:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chou Tzu-yu

On 11 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chou Tzu-yu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the public apology of 16-year-old K-pop star Chou Tzu-yu for waving a Taiwanese flag is believed to have helped Tsai Ing-wen win the Taiwanese presidential election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chou Tzu-yu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion needed

Hello. We have two discussions pending in the capital punishment talk page for which I would like to have your opinion:

On the creation of a section about deterrence (Talk:Capital punishment#Deterrence).
On the deletion of a section about the Tang Dynasty (Talk:Capital punishment#Tang Dynasty).

I believe your opinion would be wise on these two issues, because you are Taiwanese, and because you made last year a contribution about deterrence in the same article.

But that's only a proposal, don't feel compelled to intervene. I would perfectly understand you decline to do so.

Thank you.

Urutine32 (talk) 08:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lasersharp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lasersharp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lasersharp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proofreading request of CTi News

Hi, I just noticed you're Taiwanese user who edited the game. So I request you to help editing of a Taiwanese media's article. If you see my update, feel free to fix. Thanks. --Beta Lohman (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture#Governar

Hello! Could you help me to find chinese original name for Governar № 5,6,7 in link above?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Holger Chen

Hello, Lasersharp,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Holger Chen should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holger Chen .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Getac

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Getac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Getac

Please work on the article in draft to demonstrate notability; you can then submit for review. Deb (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Getac (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gorden 2211 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While a laptop manufacturer might be notable, currently, it does not pass WP:NCORP. [1],[2] are company profiles and aren't reliable sources. [3],[4] are reviews, one of which is definitely sponsored and the other is likely also sponsored. Thus, it has no reliable sources. Perhaps try to put some unbiased reviews in, then it would be eligible for publication.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Getac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Getac, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gorden 2211 (talk) 07:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lasersharp (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon, thanks for your reviewing this article, I've added additional reliable sources for your consideration, please take a look if you get a chance. Lasersharp (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Getac has been accepted

Getac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Gorden 2211

(talk) 00:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't put an external link to its website since that's already in the infobox.

Got it, thanks for your time Gordon. Lasersharp (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]