User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20 ← Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30

20:30:01, 2 May 2015 review of submission by Tnguyen4321


Submission of ConcertHotels.com

Mjkelly26 (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2015 (GMT)

Hi Tokyogirl79, a few months ago you deleted a submission of mine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConcertHotels.com, but you provided some fantastic feedback. I've taken your points on board and I've just resubmitted my entry. I hope that you feel it is much improved and would love to hear your feedback, Many thanks, Mike \

Workload management for air traffic controller

Hi, Tokyogirl79, a few days ago, you deleted a submission of mine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Workload_management_for_air_traffic_controllers, but your suggestion is really helpful for me. I've followed your suggestion edited my draft and resubmitted it. I hope you feel my draft is much better than before. Waiting for your response. Thank you. Zoe

20:37:39, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Outflanked


Hello again - I have done a much better job (I think) of providing multiple citations from newspaper articles as you suggested, and have even formatted them correctly (I think). I very much appreciate your time and consideration. Best- Kevin/LSO

Wikiclaus Cheer!

Wikiclaus greetings
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikipedia cheer from Wikiclaus himself. This
message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiCheer, and hopefully makes your day just a little bit better. Choose to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirit from Wikiclaus.

Quviahugvik

From high in the Canadian Arctic CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter or Summer Solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Adapted from User:WereSpielChequers greetings

Happy New Year


Tito Dutta (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, Tokyogirl79

Pratyya (Hello!) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Happy New Year, Tokyogirl79

Peppy Paneer (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Brianne Siddall article help

Hi, can you rewrite the lead paragraph so that it highlights the roles you mentioned on WT:ANIME? All the details about her accident and her birds can be moved out of there to a Personal life section as that seems to be the only kind of detail people want to be adding to the draft outside of the piles of video games that are extremely difficult to source. It really just needs a paragraph about why she is important to keep around in Wikipedia to get it out of draft status, but NJOrozco has not gotten around to writing that for many months. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the roles. I've subbed the article to get it out of draft. I think it's comparable to other voice actor bios that show notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Photography

You are invited...

Women in Photography
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for all your help on the Brianne Siddall article.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration

File:Monir Portrait-exh ph021.jpg
You are invited...

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Please Help | Vikram Singh Wiki Page

Dear , Greetings! Can you please help me fix the issues on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikram_Singh_(actor). Awaiting your revert.--Piyushratnu (talk) 06:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

  • Piyushratnu Hey! I fixed the citations so they're not bare links, but I removed the FilmiBeat profile and the TOI news article. The first is something that'd be better for the external links section since it's more of a personal biography that he wrote himself or was supplied by someone working for him. At most it might be seen as a primary source, but it's not really the best source to use since we can't guarantee who wrote and posted it, meaning that it could've been written by the site, his agent, or even a fan. Now if it was an article that was marked as written by the site's staff, that'd be a bit different. I've put it in the external links section, though. Now the TOI article would be considered a RS, however it only mentions him briefly in relation to something else. It could be used to back up the fact he was in a movie, but there's already a better source that not only backs this up but also helps to establish notability. I've removed the bit about it being written with a fan's perspective since I don't really see anything in the article that would really stand out as being written from a fan's perspective. All the article really needs now is more sources to back up the various bits of data that aren't otherwise sourced. Be careful when looking for sources since just saying that someone is in a role isn't going to be seen as a source, since any of us can make a claim. You need to back it up with something like a news article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot Tokyogirl79. I will get back to you with sources and articles after cross checking with client. Can you suggest me how to move ahead inorder to remove the notice: This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (August 2012), if I can get a list of documents required for the same I can submit it for verification.--Piyushratnu (talk) 07:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Generally news stories like this one would be excellent to have since they specifically focus on Vikram. Since notability has already been established what we really need now are just things that mention him in relation to stuff like the Mumbai Godfather role. We can use stuff like this for that, so I'll go ahead and add this review to the article. Other than that... I think that the only thing in the career section is the part about his Tamil language debut. Other than that, we could use some sources that back up the information about when and where he was born, although anything you can find about his early and personal life would be nice since we could add that to the article as well in a personal life section. We would have to be careful about what's added to some degree (for example, articles typically don't list significant others unless they've been together for a fairly long amount of time) but in general it's just nice to have. We can use some primary sources for this sparingly, but ideally they'd be in articles written by media outlets like TOI or the big movie websites. I think that in general there's probably enough in the article to really take care of the source tag, although ideally there would be more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
For rescuing the article It (character) from deletion by transforming it with new reliable sources. Nice work! Prhartcom (talk) 05:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Edits to Population Zero article

Thank you for your explanation for your edits. One thing I'd note is that the removed material linked to C.J. Box's Wikipedia page, on which there was a brief synopsis of Free Fire that made the overlap very clear. Might that suffice, if the wording on the Population Zero page reflected that? 35.10.210.72 (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Hiya! I gave a response on the talk page. Ultimately it's a matter of waiting for more coverage since the claim is something that could be considered contentious if Pinder caught wind of them and he could easily argue that we're including them based on only one source, which isn't the strongest. What we need more are things like THR and other outlets writing about the claims rather than interviewing Box. Interviews are always sort of questionable on Wikipedia for various reasons. Also, we can't really use the synopsis as a source since that'd be considered original research, which shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • I'll drop a note at BLP/N about this just to make sure, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Makes sense. Thank you for taking the time! 35.10.210.72 (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Encyclopedias and/or Reference Works

Would you like to support the creation of and/join the proposed Wikiproject for Encyclopedias and/or Reference Works?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

GLAM Boot Camp announced (June 14-16 in DC)

You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Link for GLAM Boot Camp

My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. -Pete (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Murtaza Khojami (M.N.F Music)

Okay so a article in the new page feed came up of Murtaza Khojami (M.N.F Music), which apparently you did delete Murtaza Khojami, it seems there was some sockpuppet going on before or a AFD or something, but not sure where the source of it all is, not sure if you can find out. Wgolf (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Wgolf, offhand it doesn't look like it's the same user - the prior version of the article had some extremely broken English, to where this user looks to be more proficient. The two articles look to be different content, since the current version focuses solely on electronic music whereas the other article had the guy as a jack of all trades. Offhand this looks like it might be about a different person by the same name. There's still some serious notability issues going on with the article so unless there are some foreign language sources I'd say that he would fail notability guidelines and probably even A7. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for participating


Thank you for your contributions


Almost 400 new articles were created

Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon

(check out our next event Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon)

--Ipigott (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Edit and Recreate Carmine Miranda

Hello, I want to work on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Carmine_Miranda and make the necessary edits. There are more credible references now and i'll love the article to be released to me to work on. Waiting for your feedback. Wikielite360 (talk) 12:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Another Silk Purse Award

Silk Purse Award
I am both pleased and honored to present you with another Silk Purse Award in appreciation for your superb improvements to the Wasteland (2013 film) article, essentially changing what was seen as a sow's ear by some into a terrific silk purse to serve the project and its readers. You have my admiration and respect. Keep up the good work. Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

The Gospel of Simon: Revelation of the Sacred Mysteries

Your comments on the subject article were the most thoughtful and rational, which I appreciate (unlike others that had an obvious bias). Your points hit the nail on the head. There is an irony, however, that wiki relies on self published edits of its articles, but seeks an outside authority to assess the merit of books.Christopher Carpenter (talk) 23:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Submission of Solidiance

Hi Tokyogirl79, a few months ago you deleted a submission of mine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solidiance. I've taken your points on board, but i can't the page, The reason given is: Repeatedly recreated. Can you help me on this?

  • @Ashwinkhan: Are you Monsieurdan or Aieroel? If so, then you really need to log in under the respective account and seek an unblock. Opening up a new account is seen as block evasion and is enough to block you on that basis alone. In any case, you really need to ask Joe Decker about restoring the article since he was the one who deleted it at AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Smelling socks, pt 2

And still needing a wash: FYI see Davide Anselmi ( Composer ). Regards, 220 of Borg 12:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Yikes. It looks like I missed that one. I'm glad you told me so I can keep my eyes out for new socks. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
No problemo! I just added info to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Toward the Tower ( Film 2019 ) too. 220 of Borg

user Africapress

Hi Tokyogirl79, I was looking at the article Mélanie Gouby as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/10 and the article creator's name (above) piqued my interest. The editor has done a flurry of article creations in the middle of April and that is all ie. Mélanie Gouby, Ty McCormick, Kevin Sieff, Tristan McConnell, Alexis Okeowo. They are all journalists/editors, some African.

The editor's user name strongly resembles Africa Presse, a web based news service. just wondering if the articles need to be marked with some sort of coi tag? thanks. oh, and heres a kitten Coolabahapple (talk) 04:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I wouldn't tag them just yet, but I do think that it would likely be a good idea to block them for having a COI username. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
okay, thanks for your prompt response. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, ReaderofthePack. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 06:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tito Dutta (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

see also...

...here. Don't know how to get a global block, but that might be helpful. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

  • It looks like we'd have to get a steward to do this. I don't know any myself so I'm going to ping a few of the people listed here. @Masti: @NahidSultan:
For those coming into this, ultimately what we have is an editor who is posting across several different projects in an attempt to post attack content, likely in retribution for being blocked on the Spanish language Wikiproject. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
  • It looks like the main account behind this (ELreydeEspana) has been globally blocked already, so these new accounts just need to be added on to all of that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) @Tokyogirl79, Drmies: There is a request for global lock here. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi all, Thanks for the ping. It's done now. ~ Nahid Talk 06:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

Nice to wake up and find a cogent informed response, and the restoration of the Gill page. I'll certainly provide several academic reviews of his work shortly, which should secure some (relative) immunity against the mechanical deletion of that page. It is certainly in wiki terms a borderline thing: Gill, not only in my private estimation, is an unsung genius of the byways of Japanese poetry: the few academics who mention him acknowledge that. I just dislike the fact that labourers in the field like him are suddenly 'discovered' by the inattentive when it is too late.Cheers Nishidani (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Spotlight on women entertainers!

You are invited...

Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Jennifer Prediger

Jennifer Prediger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hi again Tokyogirl79. I am wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at this article. Only sources cited are primary (Twitter account, etc.) and some link that doesn't seem to mention her at all. I'm not sure if any of what is being cited in helpful in establishing notability for a stand-alone article per WP:NACTOR, WP:AUTHOR or even WP:BASIC. Any suggestions on how to proceed in this case? It has been tagged with {{Primary source}} for over a year without any independent reliable sources being added. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • It looks like she's had some roles in some notable enough films, so she'd likely pass notability guidelines for creative professionals. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look and finding the sources you added as citations. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Robby Starbuck

I request the undeletion of this Article deleted after discussion. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 11:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Page should be restored, See Additional sources of Notability

Collapsed content

MTV article regarding the longform release of 5 videos for AKON album (Includes photo of Robby Starbuck & Akon) http://www.mtv.com/news/2039004/akon-announces-five-part-album-stadium/

Billboard article regarding his work with EVE & Gabe Saporta http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/the-juice/1556337/behind-the-scenes-of-eve-and-gabe-saportas-make-it-out-this-town

It's notable that he directed the official music video for the Paramount Pictures produced motion picture TERMINATOR: GENYSIS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSLFITzW0nA

see BET article regarding his work with AKON http://www.bet.com/news/music/2014/03/11/akon-opens-up-about-b-howard-being-michael-jackson-s-son.html

HitFix article regarding nomination for Grammy with Salaam Remi Feat. Akon Video http://www.hitfix.com/immaculate-noise/salaam-remi-talks-grammy-nominated-one-in-the-chamber-nas-and-jennifer-hudson

Director for these films listed on IMDB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2017590/

Film produced by Robby Starbuck "Every Word is Handwritten" was in Tribeca Cinema's film festival in New York http://bigapple.festivalgenius.com/2013/films/everywordhandwritten_bigapple2013_bigapple2013

IFC Channel article on Billy Corgan that touches on Robby Starbuck's work http://www.ifc.com/2011/07/billy-corgan-and-the-fools-journey-part-1

I searched online to find his YouTube page has nearly 100 million views and 100,000 subscribers. This rationally tells me that his work is notable to many people.

From the previous citations on the deleted page page his work for Smashing Pumpkins, Akon, Eve, Sarah Bareilles, Megadeth, Snoop Dogg, Shiny Toy Guns and Metric is notable by community standards. He has been nominated for the best video music video award at the MMVA's on Much Music in Canada, Best Rock video & Best Video with a message at the MTV VMA's as well which was cited on the old page.

I believe in total the notability is very much established. Note the length of time this page was active with users updating & adding additional news/entries and pages for the name "Robby Starbuck" are included on various foreign countries wiki or encyclopedia sites.

Copy & Pasting the instructions from the attempted deletion review instructing to contact you— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:e000:224b:4c00:795c:280a:a22d:a145 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 22 April 2016

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robby Starbuck, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Article should be restored, See Additional sources of Notability I plan to add.


Adding this note:

Also found these Wikipedia pages referencing Robby Starbuck

The Smashing Pumpkins discography ‎ (links | edit) Dance Gavin Dance ‎ (links | edit) User talk:Sartrehush ‎ (links | edit) A Shipwreck in the Sand ‎ (links | edit) Jeffree Star discography ‎ (links | edit) Teargarden by Kaleidyscope ‎ (links | edit) August Burns Red discography ‎ (links | edit) Sara Bareilles discography ‎ (links | edit) Escape the Fate discography ‎ (links | edit) Owata ‎ (links | edit) A Skylit Drive discography ‎ (links | edit) Music video director ‎ (links | edit) Starbuck (surname) ‎ (links | edit) Detox Icunt ‎ (links | edit) User:TheEamonLanceley/sandbox ‎ (links | edit) Asking Alexandria discography ‎ (links | edit) User:Zacharyupikekennedy ‎ (links | edit)

Mentor request - review of new article?

Hi, it's been a while :) Would you mind having a look at this new article in my sandbox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eartha78/sandbox/draft_1

Thanks Eartha78 (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Eartha78 It looks like you use quite a few blogs or blog-type self-published sources in the article. Be careful of using these since those can be very easily contested and in some cases, people may outright remove them if they (the editor) doubts that they are a RS. For example, I can't find an awful lot about Sam the Wheels, so be careful of that one. It's likely correct but you have to be able to vouch for these sources. To a degree Afropunk and openDemocracy sort of fall under this as well since it's not immediately clear whether or not they take user submitted content and if so, if they edit the content before publication. I'm not terribly worried about these sources, but it's just something to be careful about. The other thing that stood out was that you didn't cite which pages of Queer Domesticities or Black Artists in British Art you were using in the article. Other than that I did notice that you used primary sources but it shouldn't be a problem since you're only using them to back up the existence of various art pieces or Ajamu's statement on a piece. Those are all sort of just quibbles about the sourcing in general since notability has already been well established.
The only other thing that stood out was that the second quote seems a little abruptly put into the article. It looks like it's meant to come off of " in addition to his art practice, continues to document black LGBT experiences", but it doesn't entirely come in quite like the first quote does. I'd say that it might be a good idea to put it in a quote box to the side since that'd still keep the quote but make it flow a little better. Offhand this looks ready to be moved to the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Tokyogirl79 that's really useful feedback - thanks very much! Eartha78 (talk) 07:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
It's never easy to edit your own writing, even harder to see your own writing nominated for deletion, hardest of all to nominate your own writing for deletion. Your clear-headed, thoughtful and self-critical work is appreciated. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

86.4.217.101 Edits

Hi Tokyogirl79 sorry to cause any inconvenience but I want to highlight the bad editing practise and vandalism of 86.4.217.101.

For the last couple of weeks he has constantly being removing information from 2016 French Open - Women's Singles. For their first couple of edits I continued to undo them but recently it has become a chore despite other users also undoing this user's edits.

Any attempt to communicate and compromise on the user's talk page garnered no response and all my messages were just deleted. The situation escalated last night with the user vandalising my talk page with abusive messages, both of which I have now deleted.

I would be grateful if you could find the time to review this user's behaviour and see is any action warranted.

F1lover22 (talk) 08:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I've blocked them for 31 hours, so hopefully that should deter them somewhat. It's kind of hard to completely deter IPs since this only blocks that one IP, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your quick response. Just trying to make Wikipedia a positive space for all users 08:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Erina

Thanks for dealing with Erina language. I'm wondering though, whether salting this page might not be a bit counterproductive. The hoax article keeps getting recreated once in a while by a different sockpuppet, each time with a slightly different title, usually a variation on "Erina". The last time it was Еrina language (the "E" is Cyrillic), there's some info in the archive at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo. When that happens again, I think it will be much easier to detect the suspicious activity if it happens on the original Erina language – a page that is already on the watchlists of many people. That's how we detected it this time: almost immediately after the sock made an edit there, while the hoax article at the alternative title had been lying around undetected for almost a month. On a side note, it appears to have been recreated as a redirect in good faith this time. Erina does look like a plausible alternative spelling for Arniya language, but that needs some investigating which I haven't done yet. Uanfala (talk) 10:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbulingam 3D

Look what I found for Jambulingam... in Tamil it's ஜம்புலிங்கம். . Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Our Romani-disliking IP is back..

When protection dropped off they just redirected the list again. Not sure what else to do other than taking it to ANI. They dont communicate on the talkpage (either the articles or their own) and have not taken the simplest of advice - take it to AFD. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I've protected it again, this time for 10 days. Since they're on an IP and they seem to jump around a little, there's not much we can do. We don't generally block IPs for overly long periods unless the abuse is extremely common and rampant - and I mean rampant. The reason behind this is that Wikipedia doesn't want to punish someone who might be unrelated, but also because it's so common for abusive editors to IP hop. It's usually just easier to protect a page, to be honest. I think at this point a very good option might be to take it to AfD. I know that this can be seen as giving the IP what they want, but the benefit of this is that if the page is nominated and it is kept, they don't have a leg to stand on anymore. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Well I did suggest that in multiple locations to the IP, but I ultimately dont see the need for deleting it, so I am not about to nominate it myself! :) I suspect given past decisions however that AFD would come down to keep - list articles are generally kept if they have a defined focus and are sourced correctly. The IP probably knows this which is why they havnt done it. Only in death does duty end (talk) 08:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
  • That's what's keeping me from nominating it as well, since I have a strong feeling that it'd end in a keep also. Still, it'd be a good way to get them to lay off and if they ever post on the talk page, I'll nominate it for them. It looks like they're shifting their focus somewhat to removing categories from pages, so I'm thinking that we may have to play whack a mole with the IPs and block what we can if it gets any worse. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Question

Why did you delete Fashion Week Online?

a) It was a different article than the one originally deleted. b) It was notable. Where exactly does it fail notability tests, with all of the citations, including Lonely Planet?

Would love for you to clarify.

With respect, it's easy to see why so many people see Wikipedia editors as a spiteful, cliquish lot.

Where exactly is the common sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papeetlov (talk • contribs) 08:48, 27 May 2016‎

  • First off, please be a little more calm when asking about a deletion. It's not that I can't understand your frustration - I understand it all too well - but going in and saying words like "spiteful, cliquish" does put one on the defensive and isn't really helpful when it comes to requesting undeletion or explanation.
That said, the article didn't overcome the issues that were posed at the AfD last month. You put in a ton of cites, but by large these were the same sources that were in the prior article (which actually had more sourcing). Now the problem with the sourcing at the deletion discussion last month was that they only mentioned FWO in passing and as such would be seen as WP:TRIVIAL sources. What you need to establish notability would be in-depth coverage where FWO is the main focus of the article. Brief mentions as a source for news coverage isn't the type of thing that would establish notability on Wikipedia. It'd help argue that FWO could be used as a reliable source but being a RS doesn't make a site/source automatically notable. Also, the thing about sourcing is that you can put a ton of sourcing into an article but if the sources aren't the type that establish notability then it won't really accomplish anything. In other words, I could put 100 citations in an article but if they're all trivial, primary, or otherwise unusable for showing notability then the article would still fail notability guidelines, which is ultimately the main thing you'd have to overcome with any new article creation of FWO.
Now while true, the article wasn't written identical to the prior version, it also didn't overcome the issues posed at AfD. As such, it did fall under WP:G4 and I deleted it. Now if you want to restore it, you need to talk to Yamamoto Ichiro, the person who closed the AfD. I'll warn you - it's super difficult to establish notability for websites and there are actually a lot of popular websites that I'd like to add to Wikipedia but cannot because they fail notability guidelines since there's a dearth of coverage for them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Vicente S. Santos, Jr.

Hi again Tokyogirl79. Would you mind taking a look at Vicente S. Santos, Jr. when you have some time to spare. It's another bio which is pretty poorly sourced and which has also been heavily edited by a COI (WP:COIN#Vicente S. Santos, Jr.). I've been looking for sources while trying to help others clean up the NPOV issues, but I am not having very much luck which means this could be another case of WP:BARE. For reference, I've asked about this on talk pages of the three WikiProjects listed on the article's talk page and have gotten some response, but that was primarily to help clean up COI issues. Also, there does not seem to be a corresponding article on Tagalog Wikipedia which might have provided some hints on where to find some better sources. Anyway, I've started a thread at Talk:Vicente S. Santos, Jr.#Sources and Wikipedia notability discussing my concerns, so any comments you may have would be most appreciated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Le Cygne (Baudelaire)

Dear TokyoGirl, you're right, this article on Baudealire's poem DOES have "issues". However, it's a fairly close translation of the French article "Le Cygne (Baudelaire)". What do you suggest should be done to try and get it accepted on English Wikipedia? Many thanks ! Elisabeth Cottier F (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Hi! Sorry for the late reply - I've had finals this week and I've been a bit busy the last few days, to say the least. I can't find the link to the deleted article to give you highly detailed specifics, but here's an offhand on what I do remember:
  1. The article had some issues with original research (WP:OR), which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Different language Wikipedias have different guidelines on what they will or won't allow, so the French language WP might have been more lenient in this regards. However on here it's far more strict, if not the most strict out of the various projects. As such, every claim needs to be sourced to something that explicitly backs up the claims in the article. Also, be careful when inserting a specific statement that says something that might be seen as a personal statement (like "the daisies in the painting by John Smith are a cheerful glimpse into the heart of the painter"). When using these, you should be referencing a specific statement by a reliable source, a trusted authority and put it in quotations. Otherwise this is really seen as a personal opinion, as art in all its formats (poetry, painting, etc) is fairly subjective.
  2. When using sources, make sure that the source is a reliable one. By this I mean that it's in a place that Wikipedia would consider reliable like a journal article or a mention in an academic work. Just make sure that when you use the cites, that it isn't just mentioning the work in passing - it has to be reasonably in-depth and ideally the poem should be the focal point of the piece or at least have 1-3 paragraphs devoted to it.
  3. Finally, make sure that the poem is individually notable outside of Baudealire. Most work does not inherit notability from its creator (WP:NOTINHERITED) and it takes an awful, awful lot to justify someone reaching that level. For example, Shakespeare is typically considered to be at that level of notability (although I've seen one or two cases where someone questions individual works) while authors like Stephen King (who is probably the most well-known living horror author nowadays) is not. Heck, I've even seen people argue that individual poems by people like the Bronte sisters wouldn't be individually notable. It's a really difficult thing to argue and the implication is that if the person is that notable then there will be a ton of coverage of the work in question.
Hopefully some of this helps. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Unblocking LordStarscream100

Hello. A month ago you blocked my account, LordStarscream100, when I created articles for two films I've made. This came as a huge surprise to me - not only was I not given a warning about doing such a thing, but your reason for blocking me was that I was creating the articles to promote my films. That was not my intention. In fact, this all started when one of my friends went onto the article for bread crumbs and, as a joke, referenced a film we made with a similar title. This gave me the idea to create articles on here for several of my movies, not as a joke, but very seriously. I was not trying to spread word about my projects or promote them in any way. All in all, I thought it would be cool to create articles for them. I didn't see anything wrong with that.

I'd prefer not to argue with you, as I'm extremely busy with other things and as you probably saw, my edits on Wikipedia are small. If you can unblock me, that would be great. I'll contribute to the website appropriately.

Thank you!

--LordStarscream100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.146.113 (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I must warn you - using this IP address is seen as block evasion since you are making active edits to Wikipedia. I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to give this IP address a short block and I'll explain why on the IP page and on the main account page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Understanding Terms

I have read the message you sent me and I understand what you're saying. While editing outside of my account I obviously didn't mean to make any poor edits, but I did so believing we'd find a resolve and my account would be unblocked. So while I did evade my block, I did not do so to make any malicious edits.

Hopefully this will allow my account to be unblocked.

--LordStarscream100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.146.113 (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Please stop posting here while you are still currently blocked. Right now the only and I mean only place you should be posting is on the talk page of the blocked account, LordStarscream100. You can ping me by posting {{u|Tokyogirl79}} on the article talk page. You should also be making these comments on your talk page under your blocked account. The reason why I'm emphasizing this is that I have already told you that posting on my userpage (or making any other edits other than on your talk page) is seen as block evasion and are against policy. I need to repeat this: you were breaking policy by making IP edits and despite being specifically told that this was against policy, you're doing it again. As an admin, especially the blocking admin, I have to assume that you've learned nothing and would likely continue to violate guidelines if you are unblocked. You can't just say "sorry" and get an automatic unblock, you need to prove to us that you can be trusted to follow the rules and right now you're not following the rules. I'm going to post part of this on the respective talk page of the blocked account. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Celebrating Pride @ Women in Red

You are invited...

LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon

Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Reporting - User Moredecai deleted block info

Geeetings, User Moredecai removed the Blocked info you posted yesterday With this edit: 

14:13, 9 June 2016‎ Moredecai (talk | contribs)‎ . . (21,220 bytes) (+9,050)‎ . . (afc draft Haggai)

It is confusing to me why the blocking info was replaced with one of the Signpost pages. I know it is okay to revert inappropriate article edits, but should not on a user page or talk page. So I do not know if any further corrective action is needed at this time. Should the Block notice be reposted? Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

  • They can blank a block notice, but not a declined block notice. However what they did wasn't blanking but rather an attempt to get around their block and continually edit in a disruptive manner, so reposting the prior content would have been the right thing. Offhand it looks like they have a history of block evasion, so I've opened an SPI. If you notice anyone editing in a similar manner you'll probably want to add it to the investigation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I dun goofed.

Hi, can you revert my recent page move from Template:Catholic to Template:Catholic Encyclopedia and redo it correctly? I accidentally suppressed redirect creation so now there are ~5000 pages with the text "1. redirectTemplate:Catholic Encylopedia". Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hang on, don't worry. I created a redirect and that seems to have fixed the mistake. Sorry for the bother! Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Senshi-Con IP editor

Hi, I need some assistance. On Senshi-Con I have an IP editor who keeps adding uncited attendance figures, which I've undone several times. Each time they undo without comment. Not sure where to go at this point. Esw01407 (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I can do a temporary semi-protection, which would ideally force the IP to discuss things on the talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Prefect thank you! Also, article is on my overhaul list, I think post rebuild it should have no notability issues. Esw01407 (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  • That IP went back and undid everything again. Esw01407 (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I've protected the page for 10 days and I also re-added the sources template since it still needs sources. I also re-wrote the mascots section since it was still written in an in-universe style. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Robby Starbuck

As requested I reached back out to Sandstein and he said he's "Bored by popular entertainment subjects" and asked if I can write to another admin to undelete it... Can you please help here or point me in the right direction? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:224B:4C00:5C17:98EF:2FE2:B599 (talk) 21:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I can restore this and send it to AfC, where you can work on it and submit it for approval. One of the biggest things you need to focus on is finding coverage that specifically focuses on Starbuck. Sources that only mention him in passing are seen as WP:TRIVIAL sources that cannot establish notability unless they mention something big, like him winning a major award.
Now speaking of awards, if the award is for something like "best song" then that does not count towards notability for Starbuck since he did not write the song and notability is not automatically inherited by him working with notable persons/groups. (In other words, Remi getting nominated for a Grammy does not give Starbuck any notability at all, not even if Remi's album won.) Also, nominations do not count towards notability regardless of the notability of the award - only wins give notability. On that note as well, not all awards give notability - I'd say that there are probably only a small handful of awards in the music and film world that would give even partial notability.
The problem with the sourcing you showed at Sandstein's page is that it's all either primary, unreliable, or just shows that he's worked as a director. It's a given that someone in a given profession (in this case a director) would produce work and even work with notable persons. What Wikipedia requires is sourcing that does more than just show that someone exists within a profession - you need to show coverage and none of the sourcing on Sandstein's page is independent or in-depth.
Still, I have no problem with restoring this to AfC, although I'll be honest that I'm somewhat doubtful that Starbuck would pass overall notability requirements. It's kind of unfortunate, but music video directors tend to get pretty solidly overlooked by the media. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

James Shortt

I saw your remark on SterlingSpots' talk. I don't know what it was he actually said since it was deleted. But the article does have some very concerning problems. So far, the conversations have not been terribly constructive, and I think that is mostly due to the article's obscurity. On the one side we have editors like SterlingSpots who are fanboys alleging some kind of conspiracy theory, and on the other side we have members of an internet community that heavily dislike the article's subject and created the article in the first place. It is my contention that the article is not only of poor quality, but fails all known Wikipedia policies for notability, especially BLP. The subject of the article has written a few books of no particular note, and appears to have a record of dishonesty about his genealogical history and military experience, all sourced to a handful of brief tabloid articles and perhaps 1 or 2 mainstream news. At worst, he's a charlatan who overcharges people, but has never been convicted of any crimes. Comments from other during the last deletion discussion do not appear to full understand these policies, and at least two editors have resorted to making ad hominem remarks at myself (despite my neutrality on the matter) rather that address my policy concerns in any meaningful way. So if you have a spare moment I would appreciate your opinion. Thanks.Legitimus (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I've weighed in, but I'd recommend getting someone from WP:BIOGRAPHY and WP:MILHIST to help out with this since the article will need to be gone over with a fine toothed comb to ensure that everything is sourced, remove the unsourced or poorly sourced content, and so on. To be honest, I'd recommend getting a good collection of BLP savvy editors to clean things up and then take it back to AfD since a good chunk of the arguments seemed to kind of be a little shaky - that they felt that the article needed cleanup before it could really be evaluated. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I would also recommend working on a copy in your userspace, since that would make it easier for you to cleanup without a lot of interference. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit conflicts

Hi Tokyogirl79, I'm going to back off of that discussion as it's getting a bit messy/busy with everyone throwing their 2c in and causing loads of edit conflicts I think I'd made the point I wanted to make. Hope everything is good with you -- samtar talk or stalk 10:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

  • It is - that's a pretty messy situation overall, to be honest. I'm going to step back as well, partially because I'm leaving work soon for the day. I honestly have to say that I don't know that the guy has a really great-great chance of getting unblocked and (if he does manage to get unblocked) remaining unblocked, to be honest. He seems to be almost deliberately missing the point. (sighs) 10:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I hate to agree - I'd always like to think it's worth giving a second chance to editors who aren't blantantly vandalising the project (but hey, I'm no admin) - but it seems you're right about them not understanding. Ho hum -- samtar talk or stalk 10:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I totally understand - I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but this just seems too deliberate for comfort. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Closing ANI threads

The suggestion you gave to FAMASFREENODE about not closing ANI threads until you've had a year's experience seems like good common sense. But there is no such notice on the ANI page header. Would you consider adding it, or starting a talk process to have it added? I don't want to see new (or old) editors caught by surprise with unwritten rules, no matter how commonsense they may be. Wnt (talk) 00:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I'll start a talk process - I think it absolutely should be a guideline on there, given how heated some of those threads can be - even if they seem fairly cut and dry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Wnt: I've opened a talk thread at ANI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive_27&oldid=1088325298"