User talk:Tenpop421

Tenpop421, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tenpop421! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claude Pithoys has been accepted

Claude Pithoys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K.e.coffman (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Vision of Dorotheus

On 15 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Vision of Dorotheus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Vision of Dorotheus is one of the earliest examples of Christian hexametric poetry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Vision of Dorotheus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Vision of Dorotheus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Smith (antiquary)

On 19 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Smith (antiquary), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Smith was prompted to write The Annals of University College after the Court of King's Bench proclaimed the wrong person to be the founder of University College, Oxford? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Smith (antiquary)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Annals of University College

On 19 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Annals of University College, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Smith was prompted to write The Annals of University College after the Court of King's Bench proclaimed the wrong person to be the founder of University College, Oxford? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Annals of University College), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Dictionary of National Biography/Antiquarians

Many thanks for giving your time and trouble to this list. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to help out the WikiProject. Tenpop421 (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How to Add Images

How to add images without deletion .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saein Hamza (talk • contribs) 15:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To add an image to Wikipedia, it needs to be free or under fair use. And, if it is fair use, it needs a fair use rationale. The images you've uploaded were copyrighted, and presented without a rationale, so they were quickly deleted. Copyright law on Wikipedia is confusing, but you can read Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial for more information about finding free content, and Wikipedia:Non-free content to see if any pictures of Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti or Azad Chaiwala qualify for fair use. Good luck on any future articles, Tenpop421 (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Brown

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Robert Brown are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, i was going by MOS:DABRL, which states red links should not be used if the article is "unlikely ever to be written, or are likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics". I assumed that inclusion in the DNB was enough to warrant notability, and likely later creation. I won't include such red links in the future if you think its unwarranted. Thanks, Tenpop421 (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence before the one that you quoted says that "A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when a linked article (not just other disambiguation pages) also includes that red link". In other words, it's perfectly fine to include a red link under the conditions that you quoted, but the entry should also include a 'blue link' and that linked article should use the red link. Hopefully someone will write articles for Robert Brown (painter) and Robert Brown (divine) (maybe you?) or mention them in another article, but until they do, there is nothing for readers to click on to find out more about them. Leschnei (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, will check for blue links in future. Thanks, Tenpop421 (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Stell

Please take more care when editing postnominals (or doing anything else): he was a brilliant man but not an FRS. PamD 08:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Really, @PamD:? According to the Times' obituary, the BMJ's obituary, and Plarr's Lives of the Fellows, Philip Stell was an FRS. Do you have a contradicting source you're going by? Tenpop421 (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Disregard that, I am stupid. Advice noted. Thanks, Tenpop421 (talk) 17:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These things happen. Actually the more I look at his postnominals the more problems I see:

Order: when I created the article I probably copied the BMJ, but I now think MBE goes first according to more general style guides - see Post-nominal_letters#Civil_usage_in_the_UK which seems pretty definite about it. Have moved the MBE to first place.
FRCSEd. I don't think that FRCSE is used. See Template_talk:Post-nominals/GBR#FRCSEd - have tried to fix it, unsuccessfully as yet, and now got to go out! Hoping to remember to check back later. PamD 18:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tenpop421

Thank you for creating Ruth Bird.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

An interesting, well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Ystumllyn

On 15 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Ystumllyn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Ystumllyn (portrait shown) has been described as the first black person of North Wales "about whom we have detailed knowledge"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Ystumllyn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Ystumllyn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

historical research

Thank you for quality articles, mostly about historic people such as John Ystumllyn, William Smith (antiquary), Elisabeth de Ranfaing and Richard Puller von Hohenburg, but also The Vision of Dorotheus and The Annals of University College, with informative edit summaries, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2311 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, Gerda Arendt. Its nice to come back from a day of work to see something like this :). Very much enjoyed creating those articles, glad someone else found something in them. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Ystumllyn

Can I just say thank you for creating the page John Ystumllyn! Totally fascinating. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 21:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flattered, Chris.sherlock, glad I stumbled across the topic. Was an enjoyable person to research, I'm glad so many other people liked it. Thanks, Tenpop421 (talk) 22:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"You Banbury cheese!" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect You Banbury cheese!. Since you had some involvement with the You Banbury cheese! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk) 03:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		Scholarly Barnstar
		For your excellent work creating well-referenced and detailed new articles. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks greatly! Same for your vouching for me here. I'm flattered. Regards, Tenpop421 (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

MMXX Lunar Calendar

Tenpop421,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 09:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Benevolence (tax)

On 14 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Benevolence (tax), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that King Henry VII of England extracted £48,000 worth of "loving contributions" from his subjects in 1491, despite the practice having been outlawed seven years earlier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Benevolence (tax). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Benevolence (tax)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Addled Parliament

On 28 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Addled Parliament, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by the end of the Addled Parliament, which James I had hoped would be a "Parliament of Love", the king feared that he was in danger of assassination? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Addled Parliament. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Addled Parliament), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

We have never interacted before but I have just seen your work on the Addled Parliament at DYK. It's excellent, thank you! —Noswall59 (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Many thanks for your scholarly contributions to articles on aspects of British history. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Addled Parliament

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Addled Parliament you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StoryKai -- StoryKai (talk) 02:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Addled Parliament

The article Addled Parliament you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Addled Parliament for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StoryKai -- StoryKai (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Death of Jordan Neely

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Death of Jordan Neely, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Problem books in physics

A tag has been placed on Category:Problem books in physics indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information about orphaned articles

Hello, I recently put an orphan banner but your article may not have been, however I looked in the information of the page and there was no redirection, do you know how to know when an article is orphan or not to avoid the unnecessary installation of a banner? Thank you SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SparklingBlueMoon. My article was an orphan when you put the banner on the page, but I linked other pages to it shortly after. To check whether an article is an orphan, just consult 'What links here' under 'Tools' on the left hand side of the page. I think given the recency of the article, the orphan banner was a little unnecessary. It takes time to link an article to other articles! Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 22:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this information, it is true that I rushed when I should have left time. I wish you good edits SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Niederdollendorf stone

On 14 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Niederdollendorf stone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Niederdollendorf stone (pictured), the Grésin plaque, and the Landelinus buckle are each controversially conjectured to depict a pagan-inspired Jesus Christ? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niederdollendorf stone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Niederdollendorf stone), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 37,089 views (1,545.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for the interesting set of three, also featured on Portal:Germany! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grésin plaque

On 14 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grésin plaque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Niederdollendorf stone (pictured), the Grésin plaque, and the Landelinus buckle are each controversially conjectured to depict a pagan-inspired Jesus Christ? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niederdollendorf stone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grésin plaque), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Landelinus buckle

On 14 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landelinus buckle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Niederdollendorf stone (pictured), the Grésin plaque, and the Landelinus buckle are each controversially conjectured to depict a pagan-inspired Jesus Christ? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niederdollendorf stone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Landelinus buckle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Landelinus buckle

Hi :) Re: your revert of my 14 Oct revision to the above-named article, I respectfully disagree that "without interruption" is the correct usage here, because the sentence describes the fact that a matter was discussed continu(ously/ally) over a period of decades: There certainly *was* interruption in that discussion; it was surely comprised of numerous submissions to academic publications, etc., which likely involved pauses of several months. This is why I think it was a continual discussion, rather than a continuous one; the latter reminds me of a long ticker tape, for example, but to say they continually do this thing means they keep returning to doing it. Just my eleven cents, Al Al Begamut (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Al. I think I was probably too quick in my revert. I appreciate the courtesy in this comment and I see your point. Looking at various sources the semantic difference between "continually" and "continuously" seems to be a bit muddier than I thought. I would say that continuously can mean without any serious break (not literally with no interruption). I was working off the stock phrase (used, e.g., in blurbs of books) "continuously in print", but looking it up "continually in print" is used with about the same frequency (though applied to books in print, it does have something closer to the ticker-tape meaning). I don't like the connotation of frequency in "continually" (thought you might well doubt it has such a connotation). I'm not sure which to prefer. No consensus? Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 17:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, a big problem for a guy like me with grammaritis is that common usage is all over the place, without respect to what a few decades ago would have been considered the only correct form. The explosion of media, and the general fact that even the top outlets all too often fail to thoroughly edit publications, has muddied things, as you point out. That's why, although I may check it first as a guide, I don't put heavy weight on common usage as compared to professional/academic definitions. But that's me; I'm that kind of stickler -- ask anybody on the street and they won't care which way, so there's an argument that what I might call "wrong" is, currently, right (enough).

Your explanation re "any serious break" in a discussion makes sense, and sways me toward your position; and I agree it's such a fine/minor difference as to not much matter. But I appreciate this (continual) discussion! :) Al Begamut (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Al Begamut: I'm glad we agree! Certainly, bad copy is often a culprit for muddying linguistic waters. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 15:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

For your edits at Kere (famine) :) ꧁Zanahary꧂ 00:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for your help with the Church of the East in Sichuan DYK :) Uriel1022 (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]