Jump to content

Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17→Archive 20
This page consists of entries that have been addressed and cleaned up, or are over one year old.

May 2019

  • Comment – The WP:LEAD section of articles often do not need sources because the lead section summarizes content in other sections of the article. If the latter content has sources, then citations are not needed in the lead. North America1000 09:55, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done – Formatted references and marked dead link. Syntaxlord (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

  • Dongding Island - This would be an interesting challenge for someone who does cleanup. The topic deserves a more professional touch than I can give it. I created this new article, and it's not a long article- maybe under 1000 words. I think it needs the touch of someone more familiar with Wikipedia standards for high quality articles- someone who does cleanup. I would just mess it up even further if I tried to clean it up. The citations are okay, but I think they could be better. I will try to learn from the way the article is changed to reform my style of editing. Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible AfD candidate, actually. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done Now we have one more reference to go. Wynn Liaw (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Final passthru before the yearly archive. Fixed syntax and typing errors. Removed words of embellishment, removed remainig non-contextual eBay citation. -- WILDSTARtalk 20:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done. Fixed the layout for the external media content. North America1000 09:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 Done Did a passthru before the yearly archive. Resolved "URL needed" errors in citations, removed red links from references, removed duplicate tags. Additional cleanup contributors were PJvanMill, Tinton5, Tom.Reding -- WILDSTARtalk 12:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2019

 Partly done Formatted references. --Syntaxlord (talk) 01:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done It does not rely on one source now. Wynn Liaw (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done: I have removed the IMDb sources, because IMDb is not a reliable source, as per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. North America1000 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • GT Dave - American drink industry businessman. A possible COI contribution, but the person looks notable to me. The article, however, needs a bit of cleanup. As an example, I am pretty sure that the phrase "His oldest brother, Adam, graduated from Louisiana State University's medical school in 2008" should be in the article. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Hawaiian Falls - reads like someone copied in a corporate report or internal history of the company. Capitalization of "the Company" and overemphasis on legal negotiations lend support to this position. -- Damenleeturks (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done - cleaned up a bit and did a rewrite of "Hawaiian Falls Waco" (same kind of edits could be applied to other sections). --Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done - Formatted references, trimmed out some unsourced personal info. Still needs primary sourcing replaced/content trimmed. Grisette (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done - fixed references 1 to 10. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Kimono -- an anon user from the UK has added a ton of content just in the past few weeks. This appears to be the same user as a known anon active on the EN WIKT, who appears to be somewhat obsessive-compulsive about Japan, and who is unable to read Japanese. They also appear to source from manga and other works of dubious academic quality. Much of their EN WIKT content has been outright wrong, with the occasionally correct fact mixed in. I suspect that much of the recent additions to Kimono require close vetting. I've done a quick pass through the Kimono#Accessories_and_related_garments section, stripping out patently incorrect "lit" additions to Japanese terms, and correcting their addition of the "hakoseko" description. However, there's a ton of content that I just don't have time to go through.
I'm an admin and editor mainly of Japanese entries on EN WIKT. Feel free to ping me for background on this user, or for any help with the Japanese terms. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 17:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Miscellaneous entries

 Fixed Tinton5 (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Orphan BLP article Randal Teague seems excessively detailed, containing material that is unreferenced, referenced to self-published sources, and/or just plain trivial in nature. Later parts of it read like a personal resume written by the subject or someone closely associated with the subject (e.g. reporting authorship of what appear to be obscure committee reports, a long list of memberships in all kinds of organizations that nobody else is likely to know, that he and his divorced wife are on friendly terms, places he has visited, etc.). Most content came from a single-purpose editor indeffed for having a corporate name, and then a subsequent editor that looks sock/meatish. The subject may be too notable to AfD, yet the current page needs a severe haircut. Agricolae (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed WildStar talk 12:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed WildStar talk 12:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Jacob Galea - please help clean this up as it says there is a COI / Paid editing. But there isn't any clear evidence that this article was paid for. User Talk: Sanjida more
 Not done Page has been moved or deleted. WILDSTAR talk 13:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed WildStar talk 13:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done - fixed spelling and grammatical errors, removed irrelevant information. werewolf (talk) 02:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 Done It now have more than one references. Wynn Liaw (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly doneI've taken a crack at it, most likely screwed something up royally. ThunderChunder! | Talk to me! | Walk with me! 12:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 Done@Thunderchunder: Didn't notice any disasters. :) Cleaned up the infobox, references, text, links. - WILDSTAR talk 19:37, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 Not done, nominated for deletion instead as I think this falls under WP:NOTDIR. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done PJvanMill (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Christine Shevchenko - this page is excessive sources, many of them are from blogs or forums. I edited it earlier this month to remove the unnecessary sources, but they were added again a few days later by the main contributor of the page. (I do agree with some of the edits) Would like a third editor to make sure the page is okay. Corachow (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done: The unreliable sources have been trimmed ThinkHat (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 Not done - For help, please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Thank you! -- WILDSTAR talk 10:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 Not done - For help, please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Thank you! -- WILDSTAR talk 12:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTAR talk 03:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Cleaned by D. himself. (Andcentra). -- WILDSTARtalk 17:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTAR talk 11:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed Russ Woodroofe (talk) 02:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Cleaned up by Rosguill, Þjarkur and Theroadislong. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 Not done, nominated for deletion instead. PJvanMill (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done - minor fixes. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 06:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 Not done, nominated for deletion instead. PJvanMill (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Closed as "delete". PJvanMill (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 Not done Nominated for deletion instead. PJvanMill (talk) 13:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done: Looks to be fixed ThinkHat (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done ThinkHat (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 DoneThinkHat (talk) 17:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTARtalk 05:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTARtalk 05:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done The article is now more balanced. PJvanMill (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTARtalk 13:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done ---Andcentra (talk) 05:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTARtalk 11:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed -- WILDSTARtalk 15:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Replaced all three by just "May" for now, following the example of the German WP. PJvanMill (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done I removed the unverifiable contents and reformatted the cast list. Corachow (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done - Section addressed by ThinkHat, Sootikins, Prairieplant, Tetrahedron17. -- WILDSTARtalk
 Done rewrote a large part to cite and reference correctly, update and remove any promotional content Miriumjenkins (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done removed heavy referencing from primary sources, self-published sources and promotional content Miriumjenkins (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done, still lacking sources. PJvanMill (talk) 19:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done - Per WP:CITEFOOT, the citation used at the end of the paragraph is sufficient to support the editor's claim and choice of words within it. Remaining MT removed. -- WILDSTARtalk 15:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done - Ghostofakina (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Fixed bare URLs, removed some citations per WP:FICTREF, WP:REPCITE, and WP:CITETRIM, added Short Desc. -- WILDSTARtalk 12:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done This looks to be a good example of the law of unintended consequences... PJvanMill (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done - Fixed bare URLs under Sources & External links, removed links to unavailable YouTube videos under External links. -- WILDSTARtalk 16:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Not long or detailed anymore, and the other problems are gone, too - I've removed all that unverifiable content instead of trying to rewrite it. PJvanMill (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Como - i added the climate chart template but i am not able to make it appear in the climate section; it seems i put the code in the right place but on my pc it is rendered in the following section (Main Sights). My screen resolution is 1360*768 on a windows desktop; at 1280*1024 is badly placed as well - user agent is Chrome but even using different user agents nothing changes. Same problem on mobile devices. If i edit only the Climate section and then preview it, it appears in the right place but when you finish editing it is misplaced nontheless. Strange Itemirus (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment Looks fine to me. Nice chart in the Climate section as it should be. Maybe it was a temporary bug? Less Unless (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 Not done See note below. -- WILDSTARtalk 12:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Itemirus The MediaWiki software is rendering the page correctly using a Responsive Design Mode (RDM). The placing of images, templates, etc. when editing and after publishing can differ for a variety of reasons. You can preview your page using source editing instead of visual editing to get a better idea how it will look before publishing. There are advanced techniques you can use as found at WP:EIS and even using CSS to force a different outcome. However, because there is an inordinate amount of images in that article, expect things to differ substantially between various screen sizes. Consider reviewing MOS:IMAGES, and in particular MOS:SANDWICH for all the sandwiching I saw in the article. Sometimes, less is more. Thank you. -- WILDSTARtalk 12:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done I've removed the bad stuff, but the bad stuff was everything, so it needs to be written from scratch. PJvanMill (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Struck the above entry. At this point, the article could be submitted to Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. North America1000 00:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Draft:Kevin Andrew Tan - This has been labeled as UPE. I already posted a disclosure on the talkpage many times already and yet it is still getting drafted due to the same reason. Not to mention, the talkpage is also getting deleted every time. Is there anything I need to do to resolve this issue and prevent the article/talkpage from getting removed? Liberma19 (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 Not done Not a cleanup request, more something for the WP:Teahouse. PJvanMill (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi PJvanMill. This article has gone through Teahouse and has been revised and improved by some editors already. This should be for cleanup now. I'm seeking for anyone's assistance here to publish the article already. Thank you. Antagonizer05 (talk) 02:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
(reinstating my removed comment and re-striking request -- both of these users are socks of the same person and have been blocked accordingly. PJvanMill (talk) 19:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC))
 Partly done converted some urls and marked several as dead. There are plenty on the webpage jamba and one heavenmusic.gr that lead to the main page rather than the one dedicated to the mentioned pieces. Need help with those - what do we do in such cases? Less Unless (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed remaining bare URLs. -- WILDSTARtalk 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
information Note: not sure if this person is even notable. No inline citations; "References" consists of google scholar citation number, two dead pages on the site of his university, two of his publications, and a dead site. There are no claims in the article that would make him satisfy one of the criteria of WP:NACADEMIC, let alone sources for them. I will try to look for some sources, but if I'm unsuccessful, I will probably nominate it at AFD. PJvanMill (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done I get the impression that there are probably enough sources out there to write an article, but it would have to be rewritten from the very ground up. For now I've gutted the article. PJvanMill (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Striking this entry as the work that remains to be done is not cleanup work. PJvanMill (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Charing Cross tube station - Recently rewritten, instead of condensing the article, the edit expanded it to a ridiculously long level, particularly the history section, but just in general. I'd like to see the previous version added to and clarified, but we're talking sentences, not entire pages of new information. The major expansion is not consistent with other articles on rapid transit stations. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
  • So, I did discuss this the person who made the edits. There is no use to go back and forth with him because it was clear he disagrees. I honestly don't think it's much of a debate that if the former page was too little then the expansion is MUCH too much. I even left suggestions of how it could be improved. The length simply isn't consistent with other comparable pages. --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't think we did discuss this as such. You made a comment that you though the article was too long and detailed. I made a comment that it was following precedents of other better quality articles from our WikiProject. I also don't think that WP:CLEAN is intended for the sort of changes that you are asking for. You don't say which articles you are comparing this one to, but, in my response, I gave some examples of other good and featured articles on our project. I only provided examples of London Underground related articles, but there is also London Necropolis railway station (GA), Herne Hill railway station (FA), London Bridge station (GA) and Quainton Road railway station (FA), all of which have long detailed history sections. I'm not suggesting that all station articles should be expanded to this level of detail - most of them don't have this amount of history - but Charing Cross tube station did have a long gestation period, which I believe is worth including. You commented that instead of condensing the article, the edit expanded it to a a ridiculously long level. Why is a detailed history of planning and construction ridiculous? As the previous version of the article was lacking basic key information, how could it have been condensed?--DavidCane (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
information Note: While at first I did think the history section seemed rather long and possibly overdetailed, on closer inspection, I get the impression that the length is not due to an excessive level of detail, but more to the amount of history that the station has. Everything in the section seems to be properly sourced, as well. That it is longer than articles on similar topics is not much of an argument in that case. Given all that, I am striking this entry as probably not needing cleanup. PJvanMill (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Converted urls, marked 1 link as dead. Less Unless (talk) 13:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Replaced dead link with a new citation. Added subject of "over-quotation" to article's talk page. -- WildStar talk 19:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Trimmed the quotation and removed the self-published source.ThinkHat (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 Done Rephrased paragraph, added citations, removed maintenance templates. -- WildStar talk 23:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 Not done Nominated for deletion instead. PJvanMill (talk) 22:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Closed as "keep". PJvanMill (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done, though I'm afraid there isn't much left of it. PJvanMill (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)* Pier Luigi Capucci needs reference cleanup (i've done partly) and there is a section "Some texts on the Web" - should it be transformed in to a External links? --Less Unless (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 Partly done Cleaned up some of these external links. More clean up is needed. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 Done - Fixed bare URLs, replaced IBX incorrect field, flagged dead links, moved links under "Some texts on the Web" to "Further reading". -- WILDSTARtalk 03:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Formatted refs to avoid doublingLess Unless (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Im flagged by a certain someone that Im coi writting article about this club. Does anyone who how to fix this? She's told me Im not allowed to touch the article anymore
information Note: striking this entry - the article was speedy-deleted for copyright violation, Dreerwin was blocked for socking and a new article was written that looks good. PJvanMill (talk) 20:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done by Tribe of Tiger. PJvanMill (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 08:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed. North America1000 01:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done — WILDSTARtalk 01:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Removed embedded links, trimmed citations. ThinkHat (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
: Done one remaining url is a dead link.Less Unless (talk) 16:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 Not done. P,TO 19104, a rewrite request goes beyond the scope of this project, and may well be more suited for WP:GOCER. — WILDSTARtalk 22:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
WildStar, I've un-struck this entry because looking at the page, I do not think it needs to be rewritten from scratch. PJvanMill (talk) 22:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed bare URLs, spelling and syntax errors. -- WILDSTARtalk 12:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed bare URLs, reduced number of duplicate links, added Reference, removed CN tag. -- WILDSTARtalk 15:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Long story short: there was a copyvio, I overreacted and did some stupid things, but in the end the article was fixed. PJvanMill (talk) 12:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Less Unless (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  • A Mind Forever Voyaging - A 1985 text adventure game by Infocom with a strong political theme. Excessive fancruft in the form of an excessively long plot description and reads as being written by a fan. It also has formatting issues, and a lack of inline citations. Waxworker (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done The referencing still needs work. PJvanMill (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done on reflection, further improvements would not really be cleanup work. PJvanMill)talk( 19:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • information Note: The Baybayin article presently has no citation needed templates on it. The article does have one "better source needed" template, in its History section. @CommanderPhoenix: Could you perhaps expound upon and provide specific examples regarding your view that the article contains "unscholarly content"? This addition qualification would be be useful. Also, it may be more functional to post your concerns on the article's talk page, where others with an interest in this specific topic are more likely to see what you have to say. North America1000 02:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
  • information Note: Struck the rest of the nomination. The cleanup request is vague, and despite being pinged, the user has not responded to provide more information. North America1000 17:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Rashid Askari Hi, hope you are fine. I have added and edited few information in this content. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashid_Askari I was add his recent pic. And some newspaper column which is published in famous newspaper. All the information i added is correct and there is a source for it. But I saw a notification above his page that is "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page." He is not my close connected person. I know him well because he a famous person in our country. How I can remove this message "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page." from his wiki page. Please remove that message from his wiki page. If you want I will clean up my editing from his wiki page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehedi-iu (talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  • information Note: @Mehedi-iu: Per recent changes to this project, it is no longer accepting submissions regarding editing to address conflict of interest matters (link). Some discussion has occurred at Talk:Rashid Askari regarding a potential conflict of interest, if anyone is interested in pursuing this matter outside of this project. North America1000 18:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
information Note: Striking this entry, as COI drafts are not something this project does. PJvanMill (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Got rid of the promotional tone. A Very Purple Ostrich (talk) 18:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • information Note: @Andcentra: Per recent changes to this project, it is no longer accepting submissions regarding editing to address conflict of interest matters (link), so striking the entry at this time.
 Partly done Got rid of the promotional tone. Andcentra (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  • information Note: @Bbarmadillo: Per recent changes to this project, it is no longer accepting submissions regarding editing to address conflict of interest matters (link). The promotional tone concerns in your post here have been addressed, so striking the entry at this time. North America1000 18:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Someone turned the article into a redirect. PJvanMill (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Load-bearing wall - Construction / Architectural element. Article had has only had one citation since 2009, the description contains a direct copy and paste of the leading paragraph (including formatting), and the whole thing probably needs to be given a good looking-over. TheJonyMyster (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done - Added the additional citations requested, but in doing so, discovered a potential copyright issue, which I am now pursuing per WP:DCV. -- WILDSTARtalk 19:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 Done - Trimmed and restructured the lead, removing much of the duplication found in the article. -- WILDSTARtalk 13:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done Could use expansion, but expansion is not cleanup. PJvanMill (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done with WP:Refill, Less Unless. You can also mark articles for automated url expansion into citations putting the {{LR}} template up on top.Guarapiranga (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the tool, Guarapiranga. I didn't know about it! --Less Unless (talk) 13:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 Not done Given the apparent non-existence of good sources, I've nominated this article for deletion. PJvanMill (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
☒N Deleted: The article was deleted per this AfD discussion. North America1000 23:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done The lead section and external links have since been cleaned up. PJvanMill)talk( 22:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Clampi (trojan) - rewrite/context | I've make a series of major edits in an attempt to resolve a resonating issue with "vandalism" (not, AGF) from Youtube fans of Kitboga (streamer) trying to warn people that wp as being used as part of a technical support scam. I've taken courses in technical writing but admittedly this needs some help. I've changed the tense to past tense to reflect the confusion as to with this is either a virus with current potential to cause harm or a historical footnote forshadowing future trojans with ever evolving capabilities. Please absolutely take 20 minutes to read the talk page before commenting. Technophant (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@Technophant This looks quite good actually. It's well-sourced, neutral, and for the most part very readable. I think it's quite clear from the lead that this isn't currently much of a threat. The only improvement that I immediately see is that the second sentence of the lead should be split up into 2 or 3 sentences. Is there any specific problem you need help with? Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 19:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done — WILDSTARtalk 05:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
information Note: for the specific cleanup work to be done, see the article's failed good article nomination, points 1 and 4. PJvanMill (talk) 00:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 Fixed bare URL, reduced number of duplicate links per MOS:DL. -- WILDSTARtalk 11:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 Partly done Cleaned up general spelling mistakes and obvious grammar errors, but syntax is still odd in some places - Spellingmistakes, June 30 2020
minus Removed Requester is overwriting cleanup changes. Article is too unstable to remain listed here. — WILDSTARtalk 03:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
information Note: I've nominated this article for deletion. PJvanMill (talk) 19:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
☒N Deleted per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoran Djurovic. North America1000 02:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive_15&oldid=1145941533"