Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
|Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.|
|Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court|
December 4, 1902 – January 12, 1932
|Nominated by||Theodore Roosevelt|
|Preceded by||Horace Gray|
|Succeeded by||Benjamin N. Cardozo|
|Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|
August 2, 1899 – December 4, 1902
|Appointed by||Winthrop M. Crane|
|Preceded by||Walbridge A. Field|
|Succeeded by||Marcus Perrin Knowlton|
|Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|
December 15, 1882 – August 2, 1899
|Appointed by||John Davis Long|
|Preceded by||Otis Lord|
|Succeeded by||William Loring|
March 8, 1841|
|Died||March 6, 1935
|Spouse(s)||Fanny Bowditch Dixwell|
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (March 8, 1841 – March 6, 1935) was an American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1902 to 1932. Noted for his long service, his concise and pithy opinions and his deference to the decisions of elected legislatures, he is one of the most widely cited United States Supreme Court justices in history, particularly for his "clear and present danger" majority opinion in the 1919 case of Schenck v. United States, and is one of the most influential American common law judges through his outspoken judicial restraint philosophy. Holmes retired from the Court at the age of 90 years, 309 days, making him the oldest Justice in the Supreme Court's history. He also served as an Associate Justice and as Chief Justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and was Weld Professor of Law at the Harvard Law School, of which he was an alumnus.
Profoundly influenced by his experience fighting in the American Civil War, Holmes helped move American legal thinking away from formalism and towards legal realism, as summed up in his maxim: "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience." Holmes espoused a form of moral skepticism and opposed the doctrine of natural law, marking a significant shift in American jurisprudence. As he wrote in one of his most famous decisions, his dissent in Abrams v. United States (1919), he regarded the United States Constitution as "an experiment, as all life is an experiment" and believed that as a consequence "we should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death." During his tenure on the Supreme Court, to which he was appointed by President Theodore Roosevelt, he supported efforts for economic regulation and advocated broad freedom of speech under the First Amendment. These positions as well as his distinctive personality and writing style made him a popular figure, especially with American progressives, despite his deep cynicism and disagreement with their politics. His jurisprudence influenced much subsequent American legal thinking, including judicial consensus supporting New Deal regulatory law, pragmatism, critical legal studies, and law and economics. The Journal of Legal Studies has identified Holmes as one of the three most cited American legal scholars of the 20th century.
Early life 
Holmes was born in Boston, Massachusetts, the son of the prominent writer and physician Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. and abolitionist Amelia Lee Jackson. As a young man, Holmes loved literature and supported the abolitionist movement that thrived in Boston society during the 1850s. He graduated from Harvard University in 1861, where he was elected to the Phi Beta Kappa honor society and was a brother of the Alpha Delta Phi. Additionally, Holmes was a member of the Porcellian Club, an exclusive organization, during his senior year at Harvard.
Civil War 
During his senior year of college, at the outset of the American Civil War, Holmes enlisted in the fourth battalion, Massachusetts militia, and then received a commission as first lieutenant in the Twentieth Regiment of Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry. He saw much action, from the Peninsula Campaign to the Wilderness, suffering wounds at the Battle of Ball's Bluff, Antietam, and Chancellorsville. Holmes particularly admired and was close to his fellow officer in the 20th Mass., Henry Livermore Abbott. Holmes is said to have shouted at Lincoln to take cover during the Battle of Fort Stevens, although this is commonly regarded as apocryphal. In the biography Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self by G. Edward White, the author states "the authenticity of the story is highly questionable", noting "the absence of confirmatory evidence in Holmes' own recollections of his services defending Fort Stevens".
Holmes rose to the rank of captain and received a brevet (honorary promotion) to colonel in recognition of his services during the war.
After the Civil War, Holmes became a companion of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States (MOLLUS).
Legal career 
State Judgeship 
After the war's conclusion, Holmes returned to Harvard to study law. He was admitted to the bar in 1866, and went into practice in Boston. He joined a small firm, and married a childhood friend, Fanny Bowditch Dixwell. Their marriage lasted until her death on April 30, 1929. They never had children together. They did adopt and raise an orphaned cousin, Dorothy Upham. Mrs. Holmes was described as devoted, witty, wise, tactful, and perceptive.
Whenever he could, Holmes visited London during the social season of spring and summer. He formed his closest friendships with men and women there, and became one of the founders of what was soon called the "sociological" school of jurisprudence in Great Britain, which would be followed a generation later by the "legal realist" school in America.
Holmes practiced admiralty law and commercial law in Boston for fifteen years. In 1870, Holmes became an editor of the American Law Review, edited a new edition of Kent's Commentaries on American Law in 1873, and published numerous articles on the common law. In 1881, he published the first edition of his well-regarded book The Common Law, in which he summarized the views he developed in the preceding years. In the book, Holmes sets forth his view that the only source of law, properly speaking, is a judicial decision. Judges decide cases on the facts, and then write opinions afterward presenting a rationale for their decision. The true basis of the decision is often an "inarticulate major premise" outside the law. A judge is obliged to choose between contending legal theories, and the true basis of his decision is necessarily drawn from outside the law. These views endeared Holmes to the later advocates of legal realism, and made him one of the early founders of law and economics jurisprudence.
Holmes was considered for a federal court judgeship in 1878 by President Rutherford B. Hayes, but Massachusetts Senator George Frisbie Hoar convinced Hayes to nominate another candidate. In the fall of 1882, Holmes became a professor at Harvard Law School. On Friday December 8, 1882, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts associate justice Otis Lord decided to resign, giving outgoing Republican governor John Davis Long a chance to appoint his successor, if it could be done before the Massachusetts Governor's Council adjourned at 3pm. Holmes quickly agreed, and there being no objection by the Council, took the oath of office on December 15, 1882. His resignation was accepted effective that day by the law school. On August 2, 1899, Holmes became Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court following the death of Walbridge A. Field.
During his service on the Massachusetts court, Holmes continued to develop and apply his views of the common law, usually following precedent faithfully. He issued few constitutional opinions in these years, but carefully developed the principles of free expression as a common-law doctrine. He departed from precedent to recognize workers' right to organize trade unions as long as no violence or coercion was involved, stating in his opinions that fundamental fairness required that workers be allowed to combine to compete on an equal footing with employers.
Supreme Court 
On August 11, 1902, Holmes received a recess appointment from President Theodore Roosevelt naming Holmes to a seat on the United States Supreme Court vacated by Justice Horace Gray, who had retired in July 1902 as a result of illness. The appointment was made on the recommendation of Senator Henry Cabot Lodge (Roosevelt reportedly admired Holmes's "Soldier's Faith" speech as well). Holmes' appointment has been referred to as one of the few Supreme Court appointments in history not motivated by partisanship or politics, but strictly based on the nominee's contribution to law.
Formally nominated on December 2, 1902, Holmes was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on December 4, receiving his commission the same day. According to some accounts, Holmes assured Roosevelt that he would vote to sustain the administration's position that not all the provisions of the United States Constitution applied to possessions acquired from Spain, an important question on which the Court was then evenly divided. On the bench, Holmes did vote to support the administration's position in the "Insular Cases." However, he later disappointed Roosevelt by dissenting in Northern Securities Co. v. United States, a major antitrust prosecution; the majority of the court, however, did rule against Holmes and sided with Theodore Roosevelt's belief that Northern Securities violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. This action by Holmes brought his relationship with Theodore Roosevelt to an abrupt halt.
Holmes was known for his pithy, short, and frequently quoted opinions. In more than twenty-nine years on the Supreme Court bench, he ruled on cases spanning the whole range of federal law. He is remembered for prescient opinions on topics as widely separated as copyright, the law of contempt, the antitrust status of professional baseball, and the oath required for citizenship. Holmes, like most of his contemporaries, viewed the Bill of Rights as codifying privileges obtained over the centuries in English and American law.
Noteworthy rulings 
Otis v. Parker 
Beginning with his first opinion for the Court, in Otis v. Parker, Holmes declared that "due process of law," the fundamental principle of fairness, protected people from unreasonable legislation, but was limited to only those fundamental principles enshrined in the common law and did not protect most economic interests.
Schenck v. United States 
In a series of opinions surrounding the WWI Espionage Act and Sedition Act, he held that the freedom of expression guaranteed by federal and state constitutions simply declared a common-law privilege to do harm, except in cases where the expression, in the circumstances in which it was uttered, posed a "clear and present danger" of causing some harm that the legislature had properly forbidden. In Schenck v. United States, Holmes announced this doctrine for a unanimous Court, famously declaring that the First Amendment would not protect a person "falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
Abrams v. The United States 
Later that year, however, in Abrams v. United States, Holmes — influenced by Zechariah Chafee's article "Freedom of Speech in War Time" — delivered a strongly worded dissent in which he criticized the majority's use of the clear and present danger test, arguing that protests by political dissidents posed no actual risk of interfering with war effort. In his dissent, he accused the Court of punishing the defendants for their opinions rather than their acts. Although Holmes evidently believed that he was adhering to his own precedent, many later commentators accused Holmes of inconsistency, even of seeking to curry favor with his young admirers. The Supreme Court departed from his views where the validity of a statute was in question, adopting the principle that a legislature could properly declare that some forms of speech posed a clear and present danger, regardless of the circumstances in which they were uttered.
Buck v. Bell 
In 1927, Holmes wrote the 8-1 majority opinion in the Buck v. Bell case that upheld the forced sterilization of Carrie Buck who was claimed to be of below average intelligence. In support of his argument that the interest of the states in a pure gene pool outweighed the interest of individuals in their bodily integrity, he argued:
- "We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
By the time Holmes was 80, he had dissented in so many opinions that he became known as "The Great Dissenter," a title which has been carried through the years to refer to various U.S. Supreme Court justices, including Justice John Marshall Harlan, with the latest being Justice Antonin Scalia.
Jurisprudential contributions 
Critique of Formalism 
While at Harvard Law School, Holmes gravitated toward a circle of philosophers and social scientists known as the Metaphysical Club, which was united by Pragmatism. Applied to law, this approach suggests that rules are not deduced through formal logic but rather emerge from active process of human-self government. He explored these theories in his 1881 book The Common Law. His philosophy represented a departure from the prevailing jurisprudence of the time: legal formalism. Holmes sought to reinvent common law— to modernize it as a tool for adjusting to the changing nature of modern life.
Central to this reconstruction was the question of liability. In the late nineteenth century, formalist legal doctrine held that an individual could not be liable for acts he did not cause or were beyond his control. Under this formulation, liability required intent, which could be problematic because "it requires judges and juries to make subjective judgments about individual states of mind." Thus Holmes considered an alternative to this intent standard, the law could declare liability absolute so individuals would be held legally accountable for all voluntary acts regardless of prior intent or knowledge--strict liability. The proper object of law, Holmes argued, was not to instill individual morality through punishment, but rather to publicize social duties to give individuals a fair chance to avoid doing harm before being held responsible for it.
Holmes argued that a new common law standard that liability be based on the conduct that society expects the "reasonable and prudent man" to exercise. In criminal law, he developed depraved-heart murder. If a construction worker throws a beam onto a crowded street,
|“||he does an act which a person of ordinary prudence would foresee is likely to cause death...,and he is dealt with as if he foresaw it, whether he does so in fact or not. If a death is caused by the act, he is guilty of murder. But if the workman has a reasonable cause to believe that the space below is a private yard from which everyone is excluded, and which is used as a rubbish-heap, his act is not blameworthy, and the homicide is a mere misadventure.||”|
Legal skepticism 
Justice Holmes laid the foundation of healthy and constructive skepticism in the law. Hughes writes: "Though another half century was to elapse before the appearance of Ogden and Richards' The Meaning of Meaning, exploration of meaning of meaning of law was Holmes's pioneer enterprise." Hughes further writes: "To me, Mr. Justice Holmes is a prophet of the Law."
In 1881, Holmes published The Common Law, representing a new departure in legal philosophy. Through his writings, he changed general attitude to the law. An excerpt from the opening passage captures the pragmatic theme of that work and of Holmes's philosophy of law: "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience."
In a dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York (1905)  Holmes declared that the law should develop along with society and that the 14th Amendment did not deny states a right to experiment with social legislation. He also argued for judicial restraint, asserting that the Court should not interpret the Constitution according to its own social philosophy. Francis Biddle writes: "He was convinced that one who administers constitutional law should multiply his skepticisms to avoid heading into vague words like 'liberty', and reading into law his private convictions or the prejudices of his class." Biddle also said that Holmes "refused to let his preferences (other men were apt to call them convictions) interfere with his judicial decisions...The steadily held determination to keep his own views isolated from his professional work is aptly shown by his famous remark in the Lochner case - the Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics...A constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory."[clarification needed]
According to Holmes, "Men make their own laws...these laws do not flow from some mysterious omnipresence in the sky, and...judges are not independent mouthpieces of the infinite. The common law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky." Holmes compared the Law to a bad man "who cares only for the material consequences of things" rather than as an independent moral entity.[clarification needed] Holmes defined the law in accordance with his pragmatic judicial philosophy. Rather than a set of abstract, rational, mathematical, or in any way unwordly set of principals, Holmes said that, "[T]he prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law." Accordingly, Holmes thought that only a judge or lawyer who is acquainted with the historical, social, and economic aspects of the law would be in a position to fulfill his functions properly. Although he never ruled on the contentious social issue, Holmes believed the concept justified abolishing segregation. "Racial segregation is the epitomy of evil," he said. "I also don't like Southern accents." 
As a justice of U.S. Supreme Court, Holmes challenged a traditionalist concept of the Constitution that said that the written document does not change, so neither should its interpretation.[vague] Holmes also protested against Formalism, the method of abstract logical deduction from general rules in the judicial process. According to Holmes, lawyers and judges are not logicians and mathematicians. The books of the laws are not books of logic and mathematics. He writes, "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience. The felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, and even the prejudices which judges share with their fellow-men, have had a good deal more to do than syllogism in determining the rules by which men should be governed. The law embodies the story of a nation's development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics."
Holmes also insisted on the separation of "ought" and "is," which are obstacles in understanding the realities of the law.[clarification needed] As a moral skeptic, Holmes stated that if you want to know the real law, and nothing else, you must consider it from the point of view of a "bad man" who cares only of the material consequences of the courts' decisions, and not from the point of view of a good man, who find his reasons for conduct "in the vaguer sanctions of his conscience."[clarification needed] The law is full of phraseology drawn from morals, and talks about rights and duties, malice, intent, and negligence - and nothing is easier in legal reasoning than to take these words in their moral sense.[clarification needed] Holmes said, "I think our morally tinted words have caused a great deal of confused thinking." But Holmes is not unconcerned with moral questions. He writes, "The law is the witness and external deposit of our moral life. Its history is the history of the moral development of the race. The practice of it, in spite of popular jests, tends to make good citizens and good men. When I emphasize the difference between law and morals I do so with reference to a single end, that of learning and understanding the law." George Washington University law professor Jeffrey Rosen summarized Holmes' views on politics and the law this way: "Holmes was a cold and brutally cynical man who had contempt for the masses and for the progressive laws he voted to uphold."
Retirement, death, honors and legacy 
Holmes served on the court until January 12, 1932, when his brethren on the court, citing his advanced age, suggested that the time had come for him to step down. By that time, at 90 years of age, he was the oldest justice to serve in the court's history. Three years later, Holmes died of pneumonia in Washington, D.C. in 1935, two days short of his 94th birthday. In his will, Holmes left his residuary estate to the United States government (he had earlier said that "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society" in Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas vs. Collector of Internal Revenue, 275 U.S. 87, 100 (1927).) After his death, his personal effects included his Civil War Officer's uniform still stained with his blood and 'torn with shot' as well as the carefully wrapped Minié balls that had wounded him three times in separate battles. He was buried in Arlington National Cemetery. The United States Postal Service honored Holmes with a Prominent Americans series (1965–1978) 15¢ postage stamp.
Holmes's papers, donated to Harvard Law School, were kept closed for many years after his death, a circumstance that gave rise to numerous accounts of his life. Catherine Drinker Bowen's biography "Yankee from Olympus" was a long-time bestseller, and the 1951 Hollywood motion picture The Magnificent Yankee was based on a play about Holmes's life. The availability of the extensive Holmes papers in the 1980s has led to fuller biographies.
Theatre, film, television, and fictional portrayals 
American actor Louis Calhern portrayed Holmes in the 1946 play The Magnificent Yankee, with Dorothy Gish as Holmes's wife, and in 1950, Calhern repeated his performance in MGM's film version The Magnificent Yankee, for which he received his only Academy Award nomination. Ann Harding co-starred in the film. A 1965 television adaptation of the play starred Alfred Lunt and Lynn Fontanne in one of their few appearances on the small screen.
In the movie Judgment at Nuremberg (1961), defense advocate Hans Rolfe quotes Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes twice with the following:
This responsibility will not be found only in documents that no one contests or denies. It will be found in considerations of a political or social nature. It will be found, most of all in the character of men.
See also 
- "Federal Judicial Center: Oliver Wendell Holmes". 2009-12-11. Retrieved 2009-12-11.
- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint
- Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (1881). The Common Law I. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
- Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919).
- Louis Menand, ed., Pragmatism: A Reader. New York: Vintage Books, 1997, pp. xxix.
- Jeffrey Rosen, "Brandeis's Seat, Kagan's Responsibility". New York Times, July 2, 2010. Accessed July 5, 2010.
- Shapiro, Fred R. (2000). "The Most-Cited Legal Scholars". Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 409–426. doi:10.1086/468080.
- "Supreme Court Justices Who Are Phi Beta Kappa Members". Phi Beta Kappa. PBK.org. Accessed Oct 4 2009.
- Sheldon, Henry Davidson (1901). Student Life and Customs. D. Appleton., p. 171: source for 1791 origins as the "Argonauts;" later named "The Pig Club", "The Gentlemen's Club", finally "The Porcellian". "Small as the membership has been, the roll of graduates shows many of the most famous of the Sons of Harvard, including Wendell Phillips, Channing, [Joseph] Story, [Edward] Everett, Prescott, Adams, Palfrey, Charles Sumner, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Russell Lowell and John Lothrop Motley." Online at Google Books
- James M. McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom. (New York, 1988) 757.
- James G. Randall and Richard N. Current, Lincoln the President: Last Full Measure (New York, 1955), 200.
- Benjamin P. Thomas, Abraham Lincoln: A Biography (New York, 1952), 434.
- G. Edward White, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self. New York, 1993, 64-65.
- James Taranto, Leonard Leo (2004). Presidential Leadership. Wall Street Journal Books. ISBN 978-0-7432-7226-1. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
- Northern Securities Co. v. U.S., 193 U.S. 197 (1904).
- A Falling Out: The Relationship Between Oliver Wendell Holmes and Theodore Roosevelt
- Chafee, Zechariah (1919). "Freedom of Speech in Wartime". Harvard Law Review 32 (8): 932–973. doi:10.2307/1327107. JSTOR 1327107.
- 274 U.S. 200, at 207, Justia.com U.S. Supreme Court Center.
- Uriah Barnes, et al., ed. (1919). Barnes' Federal Code. Viginian Law Book Co., and Bobbs-Merrill Co. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- "Books: The Great Dissenter". Time. May 8, 1944. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
- Lawson, Heidi. "The Great Dissenter: Justice Harlan's Impact on Race and the Law". Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL. Accessed July 6, 2010.
- Kozinski, Alex. "The Great Dissenter". New York Times. July 6, 1997. Accessed July 5, 2010.
- Sutton, John (2001). Law/Society: Origins, Interactions, Change. Pine Forge Press.
- Holmes Jr., Oliver. "The Common Law". The Common Law.
- Charles. Hughes, Early Writing of Holmes, Jr., in 44
- Harvard Law Review (1930-31), at p. 718. 312 Early Writings of Holmes at p. 677.
- 198 US 45,76 (1905)
- Francis Biddle, Justice Holmes, Natural law, and the Supreme Court, (1960), p.l0.
- Francis Biddle, Justice Holmes, Natural Law and the Supreme Court, (1960) p.49.
- Southern Pac. Co. V. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205, 222 (1917) (dissent).
- Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harvard Law Review (1897) 457
- Holmes, The Common Law,1881.
- Holmes, The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review, X (1897),457
- Frances Biddle, Justice Holmes, Natural Law, and the Supreme Court. 40 332 Path, p.38.
- 333 Holmes, The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review, X (1897), 457.
- "Historical Information: Biography of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States". Arlington National Cemetery. Arlingtoncemetery.org. Accessed July 5, 2010.
- Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1995). The Collected Works of Justice Holmes (S. Novick, ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-34966-7.
- Alschuler, Albert W. (2000). Law Without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-01520-3.
- Frankfurter, Felix (1916). "The Constitutional Opinions of Justice Holmes". Harvard Law Review 29 (6): 683–702. doi:10.2307/1326500. JSTOR 1326500.
- Kearns Goodwin, Doris (2005). Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-7075-4.
- Novick, Sheldon M. (1989). Honorable Justice: The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0-316-61325-8.
- Posner, Richard A., ed. (1992). The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions and Other Writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-67554-8.
- Collins, Ronald K.L., ed., The Fundamental Holmes: A Free Speech Chronicle and Reader (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Further reading 
- Abraham, Henry J., Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court. 3d. ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). ISBN 0-19-506557-3.
- Brown, Richard Maxwell, "No Duty to Retreat: Violence and Values in American History and Society." (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman Publishing Division of the University, by arrangement with Oxford University Press, Inc. 1991). ISBN 0-8061-268-3
- Cushman, Clare, The Supreme Court Justices: Illustrated Biographies,1789-1995 (2nd ed.) (Supreme Court Historical Society), (Congressional Quarterly Books, 2001) ISBN 1-56802-126-7; ISBN 978-1-56802-126-3.
- Frank, John P., The Justices of the United States Supreme Court: Their Lives and Major Opinions (Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel, editors) (Chelsea House Publishers: 1995) ISBN 0-7910-1377-4, ISBN 978-0-7910-1377-9.
- Hall, Kermit L., ed., The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. ISBN 0-19-505835-6; ISBN 978-0-19-505835-2.
- Lerner, Max, ed., The Mind and Faith of Justice Holmes: His Speeches, Essays, Letters and Judicial Opinions. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1945.
- Lewis, Anthony, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment (Basic ideas. New York: Basic Books, 2007). ISBN 0-465-03917-0.
- Martin, Fenton S. and Goehlert, Robert U., The U.S. Supreme Court: A Bibliography, (Congressional Quarterly Books, 1990). ISBN 0-87187-554-3.
- Menand, Louis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America(New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux). 546 pp.
- Urofsky, Melvin I., The Supreme Court Justices: A Biographical Dictionary (New York: Garland Publishing 1994). 590 pp. ISBN 0-8153-1176-1; ISBN 978-0-8153-1176-8.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.|
|Wikisource has original works written by or about:
|Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.|
- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., American Jurist
- Works by Oliver Wendell Holmes at Project Gutenberg
- "BUCK v. BELL, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)". FindLaw. Retrieved 2009-07-22.
- Holmes' Dissenting Opinion, Abrams vs. United States, 10 November 1919
- "Finding aid for Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Papers, 1841-1935.". Harvard Law School Library.
- "Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.- A digital suite by the Harvard Law School Library". Harvard Law School Library.
- Booknotes interview with Liva Baker on The Justice from Beacon Hill: The Life and Times of Oliver Wendell Holmes, September 8, 1991.
|Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
December 15, 1882 – August 2, 1899
Walbridge A. Field
|Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
August 2, 1899 – December 8, 1902
Marcus Perrin Knowlton
|Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1902 – January 12, 1932
Benjamin N. Cardozo