User talk:Amsaim

Re:Your email

Hi- that is odd! I can only assume it is a feature available on the German Wikipedia to allow translated articles to be completely GFDL compliant (see Wikipedia:Copyrights). I'm not aware of any similar feature on the English Wikipedia, so I think your best bet would be to ask for help over there. Sorry I couldn't be of more help, but I only really know about the English Wikipedia and Commons. J Milburn (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Apparently this seems to be common practice on the german page, because there are other articles on german wikipedia that have the entire version history of the original english article. A bit odd though. Amsaim (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I deleted it without opening it because I didn't recognize your name, and assumed it was spam (of which I get a lot at that address). Can you send it again? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Could you send it again? I don't think I received it. Nightscream (talk) 22:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

OTRS

Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Amsaim (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Done

It's up at sv:Genevieve Nnaji. Just a quick-n-dirty, but it should do the trick. I retired from Swedish Wikipedia a while ago, so I haven't done English-Swedish translations in quite a while. I thought I'd make an exception for your request since I assume that the Nigerian film industry isn't exactly over-represented on sv.wiki.

Peter ^Isotalo 17:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the nice translation. Amsaim (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: proofreading

Done. I made several rather minor corrections. GregorB (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the corrections. Amsaim (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Port Harcourt article vandalized

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at Phantomsteve's talk page.
Message added 07:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply

You might want to complain at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --BorgQueen (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. Amsaim (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello Amsaim, I have created a new name for Civilian casualties of strategic bombing. Thanks for your help Gregology (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Email

Responded. Don't worry too much though. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Stephanie Okereke

On a more positive note, nice job with Stephanie Okereke! You know, a few hundred more characters and I think it would be eligible for a Did you know. The front page publicity would bring some eyes. =) -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Ricky. The article is by far not complete, as I've just created it a few days ago. There's still stuff to write about the actresses' additional awards and nominations, her work as a director and the car accident she had in 2005. Amsaim (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Greek Wikipedia

You have to deal with one of the administrators of the Greek Wikipedia, my administrator rights only work on the english wikipedia . DGG ( talk ) 19:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

ok. thnx for reply. Amsaim (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, Amsaim. I hope you are member me pretty well. You told me through mail that whenever I need your favor you'll be more than willing to help me out with it, isn't? Hope yes. Now, I'm begging you to write the article about Swahili Wikipedia at there on the German Wikipedia. Would you be so kind to help me for that? Yours,--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 04:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done. See the article here Amsaim (talk) 09:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the superb article. I've seen it. It's pretty much good. Thank you again and welcome again to the Swahili Wikipedia!--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 10:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Amsaim. Yes, brother, I've created that list for the sake of our friendship. Also, I expect to translate a whole list of the Nigerians actors/actresses and it would be better if you help me for the sources. What you said is good, though it seemed to be pretty hard for me to look for all those sources. If you can me help to check for them, I will be more than willing to create a large number of the articles about Nigerians actors. Yours,--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 06:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi MuddyB. Most wikipedia articles of nigerian prominent personalities are unsourced, written like an advert, do not follow wikipedia quality standards and do not have pictures in them. There are hardly any reliable verifiable third party sources available. This is why I have decided not to update most of the wiki articles of Nollywood actresses/actors. Those that I have updated had enough reliable sources that I could use as reference. For example, Pete Edochie is one of the most famous and successful nigerian nollywood actors. He has been acting since the 1970s, and is still very active in Nollywood. But there are no reliable sources available, not even his date of birth. This is why I will bypass his article until reliable sources are found. The article of Omotola Jalade Ekeinde is written like an advert, it has multiple issues, needs to be wikified, and has no sources. This again is why I bypassed it. The majority of Nollywood articles were created several years ago, when wikipedia obvously did not have strict rules like today, because if these articles would have been created today, they would surely be tagged for speedy deletion. Anybody who translates a tagged article is not doing wikipedia a favour, because in doing so all the mistakes, all the errors, and the low quality of that tagged article will be transfered to the new wiki of the translated language. So, in a nutshell,I will stick to those articles that have enough reliable sources, and I will also create new ones. Thanks very mucn for your assistance. Amsaim (talk) 08:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Sighs. As a matter of fact, it's not an easy job at all. Nevertheless, we'll try our best. Cheers.--_{Mwanaharakati}^(Longa) 08:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at LouriePieterse's talk page.
Message added 20:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LouriePieterse 20:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at Arakunem's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arakunem^Talk 22:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Stephanie Okereke

On October 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stephanie Okereke, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

JamieS93 15:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jamie. thanks for the info. Is there any way to get the picture which I included in my DYK nomination to appear next to the article on the main page? Amsaim (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, at DYK we get a lot of hook suggestions that have images associated with them (almost half of the T:TDYK entries have images, I'd say). Since we can only have 1 image per 7 or 8 hooks, a lot of the suggested images are simply not used. And for each set of hooks, a DYK reviewer tries to pick a picture that's interesting, non-redundant, and easily visible as a thumbnail picture. So, while it could theoretically be changed, once the hooks are on the main page, the arrangement is usually not altered much (unless there turns out to be an issue with the image, like a copyright violation). Hope that helps, JamieS93 16:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks very much for the info. Amsaim (talk) 16:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Redirect

Take a look at it now - that work? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

thank you, it's now working. but how about the redirect to the Through Glass article? They had the redirect pointed to the song's article (which imo is wrong, because "Through Glass" is not the same as "Through the glass"). Won't the editors of the "Through Glass" song disagree with the new redirect, even though this redirect is correct? Amsaim (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't know - likely not, honestly, since the current redirect makes more sense. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree, this redirect makes more sense. thank you for your assistance. Amsaim (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I was offline when you stopped by - please let me know if I can help out with anything else. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 12:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks, will do so when something pops up :) Amsaim (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Infobox

Yes you have the right idea. To go live is just to move (rename) to {{Infobox African Moview Awards}} (plus the /doc and discusssion page)...

However I can then see an infobox being created for each separate award in Category:Film awards of which there are an awful lot, better would be a universal {{Infobox Movie Award}} taking a new parameter of award to specify each award and no one then needs reinvent the wheel :-)

Hence:

2006 African Movie Academy Awards
Date
Site
Host
Highlights
African Movie Academy Awards 2007 >

{{Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Movie Awards
| award            = African Movie Academy Awards
| name             = 2006
| image            = 
| caption          = 
| date             = 
| site             = 
| host             = 
| producer         = 
| director         = 
| organizer        =
| best_picture     =
| most_wins        =
| most_nominations =
| next             = 2007
}}

and

75th Academy Awards
Date
Site
Host
Highlights
Academy Awards 79th >

{{Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Movie Awards
| award            = Academy Awards
| name             = 75th
| image            = 
| caption          = 
| date             = 
| site             = 
| host             = 
| producer         = 
| director         = 
| organizer        =
| best_picture     =
| most_wins        =
| most_nominations =
| next             =  79th
}}

I'll notify the folks at WP:FILM project to see what else might be acheived. David Ruben ^Talk 01:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance. However, imo an individual infobox for the african movie academy awards is required, as this is the only major international film awards in Africa. A general movie award box just doesn't serve the purpose. if this were so, then wiki-editors wouldn't have created an individual award infobox for e.g. the emmies, golden globe, academy awards etc.

the infobox which you have created is good, and can be used by all other non-international, local movie awards, however for the amaa awards (which is attended by all 53 african countries) an individual one is required. thanks. Amsaim (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

See WT:FILM#More universal Award infoboxes, need to expand wikipedia out from US-centric (or UK-centric for that matter), so good on you :-) David Ruben ^Talk 01:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Your requests

Sorry I didn't get to your requests, I have been busy in real life lately and haven't had as much time on Wikipedia as I would like. If you still need help with them, send me an e-mail and I'll try to get to it shortly. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

thanx for your reply. In the meanwhile I've been able to create the template myself :) Amsaim (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Surulere

Hello - thought I was clear on the edit summary of this move. I will be creating page on Surulere, Oyo State within a few days and will provide necessary dab page when this is done. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)).

very good idea to create that article. wikipedia has too few african-related articles and so any new africa related article is very welcomed. thanks and best regards. Amsaim (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced Information

Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to check refs at the moment; you might consider the Reliable Sources noticeboard, the The No original research Noticeboard, or Requests for Page Protection. Since the edits stopped a few hours ago, protection might be premature - but they will be able to assist. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

yes, the ip-edits stopped, because they successfully added their own unsourced information. if I am now to removed all the unsourced info, the ip-edits most probably will start again, in clear violation of WP:V. thanks for the info with the noticeboards. Amsaim (talk) 15:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Surulere, Lagos State

The editor seems to have stopped (actually, moved onto Lagos) but I'm really not sure about your overreaction. The edits reverted aren't malicious, just newbie edits (what's the local municipality, what stadiums are there), and given the difficulty of finding editors willing to work on small Nigerian cities, I think it would be more productive if we actually tell them that we need sources on their talk page, rather than via edit summaries they aren't likely to read. I'm more concerned about WP:BITE and driving away a possible new editor rather than having a bit of news like "this stadium is in the city" unsourced. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Ricky, the edits are IP-edits, and when you compare the two edits here and here, you'll see that the IPs are different but the edits are one and the same, thus indicating a dynamic IP address. I left the WP:V in the edit summary simply because to me it doesnt make sense leaving messages on talk pages of dynamic IP-address. how effective is it leaving a message on a talk page of a dynamic IP address, when you know that the message most likely won't be read by the editor? My concern is to keep unsourced data out of wikipedia articles. When you look at the majority of nigeria-related articles (especially nigerian BLPs) you'll see that these articles contain loads of unsourced data which was added months/years back. when you now further trace the exact date when the unsourced information was added, you'll see that it was usually added via an IP-edit and remained there unchallenged ever since.

btw Ricky, Surulere is a residential area within Lagos, and has about 3 millions inhabitants :). cheers. Amsaim (talk) 10:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

After deprodding, AfD is next step

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from How to Orginize a Club and get it Prosper and to Stay Stable, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 17:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

according to the text in the prod-template, one can only remove that template if a valid reason is given or if the article has been improved. you have done none of these. apart from this, in the light of all the articles deleted (e.g. BLP articles) trying to keep this gibberish article makes one to seriously wonder. Amsaim (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

No. "You may remove this [prod] message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." Zalar objected to the deletion and removed the tag. I removed the tag because you may not retag a contested deletion. (Prod is a streamlined approach to AfD for uncontested deletion - which, with Zalar's objections, this is not.)

The article is also not patent nonsense. It is, however...let's call it unsalvageable. It does not fit into a speedy deletion category. However, I think this is a case to ignore all rules and remove it from mainspace. I've put a copy in Zalar's userspace (50/50 it's a school assignment). A redirect exists at the moment in mainspace, but it's subject to speedy deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

that's a good move there :) patent nonsense, at first, seemed like an appropriate tag, given the fact that I use Twinkle, however, reading through WP:PN I now get the idea.

So, a user can object without stating any reasons, and his objection is made known via removal of the tag? I'm asking to know, not to argue, cause I'm new to speedy-deletion tags. thnx for the info with AfD. Amsaim (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion is exactly what it sounds like: deletion for some reason that requires quick action (G12, copyright violation; G10, attack pages) or where there's a strong reason not to keep the page around (G11, spam; A3, empty pages; A7, non-notable people/groups/companies (to prevent what amounts to shameless promotion, even though it isn't spam)). There are stringent guidelines for what can be deleted under the criteria for speedy deletion. In the case of this article, when I removed a speedy tag, my edit summary read something like "decline speedy - does not meet WP:PN definition". In the case of speedy deletion, the page's creator may not remove the speedy deletion tag, though he may add {{hangon}}.

AfD is a discussion process where the case for deleting the article is presented (usually some combination of lack of notability and verifiability, but there can be other reasons) and discussed by editors. After a week (or more), an administrator otherwise not involved in the process gauges what consensus is (or that there isn't consensus) and closes the discussion. If consensus is to delete the article, the admin does that also.

Prod is for situations where it appears obvious that nobody will object to deletion. If anybody contests the deletion, including the page's creation, the proposed deletion fails. Prod also fails by definition if the page was previously under deletion discussion at AfD or previously deleted as a result of an expired prod. If nobody objects and seven days pass, the page is deleted by an admin. So, it's streamlined AfD, in a way; if prod fails, the person prodding the article will usually nominate it for deletion via AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks very much for the info. Amsaim (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Franklin Pierce

Why did you revert my edits on his page? He was the first President to be born in the 19th century, not the second. See List of United States Presidents by date of birth. Aquila89 (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

According to wikipedia rules of adding content into articles, especially BLP articles, all added content must be verifiable, must be from reliable sources with the appropriate citations. This is lacking in your edit. The wikipedia list of US american presidents does not contain any reference. The information about being the first or second president on both articles of the two presidents also do not contain any verifiable and reliable source. I suggest that you open a discussion about this issue on the articles' discussion page to try to get a consensus about this issue. Amsaim (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Re Gamatadenuma

I removed your G4 speedy deletion tag. G4 does not cover pages deleted by speedy deletion. It only covers pages deleted after discussion, i.e. AfD. Also, I noticed you cautioned the author for removing CSD tags, but I didn't see any edits where the author did that. Singularity42 (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

actually, G4 is listed at Wikipedia's Criteria For Speedy Deletion. The page was deleted by PMDrive1061 via WP:CSD#G1. Two minutes after the deletion of the page, Rmtrbk created the same page again. It was during the first creation of the page page that Rmtrbk removed the speedy-deletion tag twice, and thus the caution was added on Rmtrbk's talk page. Amsaim (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand me. G4 is a speedy deletion criteria - to speedy delete something deleted after AfD, MfD, etc. Not to speedy delete something that has been speedy deleted before. As per the policy for G4: "[G4] also excludes content undeleted via deletion review, deleted via proposed deletion, or to speedy deletions." Singularity42 (talk) 04:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

it's all good. thanks for your observations. fact remains, that an admin deleted the said article via WP:CSD#G1, and 2 minutes after the deletion, the same user recreated the same article. Amsaim (talk) 04:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Yep, it happens all the time. In most cases, just re-tag with the same speedy deletion as before, and caution the user with {{uw-create2}} (or one of the higher levels if it is repeated). Eventually an admin willl WP:SALT the article. In this case, though, as other admins pointed out, G1 was incorrect in the first place, since G1 specifically excludes foreign-language articles. Singularity42 (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Criteria

After making my above comments, I thought I would make a helpful comment regarding speedy deletion templates. It is very important to note that they have very narrow scopes, and should not be over-used. For example, A7 only covers individuals, animals, groups/organizations, and web content. Schools are specifically exempt from them, so you should not tag schools with A7. G11 is for obvious spam (i.e. "Check out our website and buy our product. We have the best prices in the world!"). If it appears to have the ulterior motive to promote a product, but is written in an encylopedic format, G11 does not apply.

PROD is a great tool when something does not meet a speedy deletion criteria but is obviously not proper for Wikipedia, and one I find very handy as a new page patroller. If you have any questions, please let me know. Singularity42 (talk) 04:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

James Gornall

Hi, I see you reverted some edits of mine, not a problem in itself but you tagged them as vandalism. The pages seems to an autobiography and is identical to the creators user pages, I redirected the page to its creators userpage and and requested its deletion as per the procedure for that sort of thing. If I made a mistake, fair enough but just to clrify, I was not vandalising the page GainLine ♠ _♥ 14:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The edits of the BLP article were tagged as vandalism because the redirect to the userpage wasnt't correct. The copy of the created article on the editor's page doesn't justify the redirect. There could be several reasons why the editor has a copy of the article which he created on his user page. Using WP:AGF there is no evidence for an autobiography. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

As you are quoting AGF, I would remind you to apply it to my edits, if there were errors then please say so in the edit summary. Please do not label me as a vandal. Applying WP:QUACK the article is James Gornall and says the nickname of the subject is JIGGY, the creators username is JIGGY G and the article is recreated as their userpage. This all points to a self-bio. I believe it would have been better for an admin to have a look at this and make a decision. GainLine ♠ _♥ 15:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I have not labelled you as a vandal. If the impression has been created, pls accept my apologies. Amsaim (talk)

The edit summary (Reverted 3 edits by GainLine identified as vandalism to last revision by JIGGY G. (TW)) sort of gave that impression. Truth be told there was a time when you would have been right but nowadays I'm on the other side of the fence. Sorry if I came across as a bit short. I'm going to place a {{coi}} tag on the page as I do believe it is an autobiography. GainLine ♠ _♥ 16:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of James Gornall

An article that you have been involved in editing, James Gornall, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gornall. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GainLine ♠ _♥ 12:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at SchuminWeb's talk page.
Message added 07:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Your user page

Unless you can provide any evidence that the song is in the public domain your user page would seem to constitute a copyright violation. Please change it, as we take copyright very seriously at Wikipedia. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Please state the wikipedia rule that is being violated against for writing lyrics of a song from the year 1929 on my user page, then I shall swiftly remove the lyrics from my user page. According to WP:UP I can't see how these lyrics on my user page constitute a copyright violation. Amsaim (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

This is a matter of real-life law, rather than Wikipedia rules. United States copyright law, which applies to Wikipedia's servers in Florida, protects content for 75 years after the death of its creator. You can try reading Wikipedia:Copyright violations and the pages linked from there if you want confirmation. I must add that I find the tone of your reply rather belligerent. Please be prepared to accept good-faith advice. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I replied in a friendly tone asking you to please provide proof for your claim. I am not attached to the text on my user page, and thus I can delete it without any problems. It is irritating to have someone order me to change my user page because of "copyright violation", when there is none. How do these 8 lines on my wikipedia user page violate against US copyright laws? Several admins have been on my user page and have found no copyright violation. WP:COPYVIO, from the way I understand it, doesn't forbid me from writing the 8 lined-lyrics on my user page. Please don't try to create an issue where there is none. Amsaim (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

This violates copyright law by the simple fact of reproducing copyrighted material. What makes you think that you have the right to reproduce someone else's intellectual property in this way? Just because some other people haven't noticed this it doesn't make it untrue. The second paragraph of WP:COPYVIO is clear about this point. I don't, in general, care what people have on their user pages, but I do care if there is any content anywhere on Wikipedia that violates copyright law. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

This issue is closed to me as I do not appreciate your aggressive tone. Please do not bother me with this issue again. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Amsaim. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Copyright violation at User:Amsaim. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I'm afraid that the song lyrics have had to be removed. Copyright was renewed on them in 1956, and they are not public domain. As Wikipedia:Copyrights notes, we can only import previously published material if it is public domain or compatibly licensed with CC-By-SA. While we may sometimes incorporate limited quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with WP:NFC, we can't reproduce an entire song on our user pages. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Kapila Abhayawansa declined speedy

I've declined the speedy deletion on this as it asserts a significance, a lower standard than notability. With 40 Google scholar hits, it might be better to discuss at WP:AFD before deleting. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nerd Corps Entertainment

Hello Amsaim, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Nerd Corps Entertainment - a page you tagged - because: producing notable television shows for a major broadcaster is an assertion of significance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  Skomorokh, barbarian  19:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, Skomorokh. I have heeded your advice and refrained from tagging new pages. It is however interesting to notice how Wikipedia's rules and guidelines are being interpreted differently by various admins. One can expect admins to have a clear understanding of Wikipedia's rules, and thus when an admin tells me something, then I do what the admins says.

In the case of this article which I tagged for speedy-deletion, the said article has now been deleted again by an admin 4 days after you wrote me your message. This article which, according to you, was significant, because it was about a "notable television show(s) for a major broadcaster" was deleted twice already in February 2009 by 2 different admins. The deletion of the same article on November 26 2009 is the third deletion of the article. Could you please add your comment to the deletion of the article which, according to the 2 admins that deleted the article 3 times, I rightly tagged for speedy deletion? Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello Amsaim. This may sound bureaucratic, but I declined your nomination because you cited WP:A7 – that the article does not make a credible assertion of significance – which I felt did not apply in this case for the reason mentioned above. The three times the article was deleted, it was for other reasons, namely WP:G1, WP:A3, and WP:A1. Regards,  Skomorokh, barbarian  20:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Lawrence Onuzulike

Your proposed deletion of this article has been disputed so I have sent it to AFD and have used part of your original prod rational in my nomination - hope this is OK with you. The AFD is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Onuzulike. Best, Nancy ^talk 10:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Nancy. Using my original prod rational in the nomination is ok with me. Do you think it is possible for you, as an admin, to explain to the article writer that he has to actually CLICK the internal Wikipedia links provided for him on his talk page in order for him to understand issues like notability or reliable sources? I'm asking this because from what he has written on the AfD page, it appears that he hasn't yet read through any WP rules. Thanks. Amsaim (talk) 04:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I've commented on the AFD and suggested he click through & alerted him at his talk. Best, Nancy ^talk 05:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at Ucucha's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi,

Hi, I made a mistake when editing that Chumnnambar boat house, it wasn't my article, I was trying to nominate it for deletion but ended up destroying your tag in the process by mistake :) ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy Birthday To You! (talk • contribs) 12:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. The article was deleted and was recreated again by the same author. The article has now been merged into the Ariyankuppam article. Amsaim (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Homance

Hello Amsaim. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Homance, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. GedUK  22:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello GedUK. Thanks for the message. As you know, neologisms must be avoided in wikipedia because they are not well understood. Sometimes the line between a hoax and neologism is hardly visible, such is the case in homance, this is why I added the CSD#G3 tag to that article. Amsaim (talk) 23:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Victoria ezike

I moved it there so the user can work on the article while it is not in the article space. The user is a new user, so I gave them a chance to edit it in userspace so they don't have to rewrite the whole thing. At the same time it can safely be removed from the article space. –BuickCenturyDriver 10:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

CSL Sofas

Hi, I understand that you would put that deletion thing on the page, because it was badly written but if its deleted before I even have a chance to speak out for myself (on the talk page) I think its a bit unfair. Please undelete it and give me a fighting chance! Quiggers1P (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Quiggers. Your CSL Sofas article was deleted not because it was badly written, but because it contained unambiguous advertising or promotion. Apart from that, this is now the 5th time this article has been created and speedily-deleted. I suggest that you acquaint yourself with the basic Rules of Wikipedia before creating another article. Read through the links and sublinks to get a good idea on how to create your article without it being nominated for deletion. Happy reading. Amsaim (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

What i don't understand is that it is a well known company in England so I was actually surprised there was no article, never mind 5 deletions. If I got some kind of 'proof' that it is a good company would that work? Or would it just fail like the last attempt? Quiggers1P (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Any article you create must adhere to Wikipedia's rules. The topic of the article must meet Wikipedia's rules of Notability, and the content of the article must be verifiable with citations to reliable sources. The article should not contain any personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions. To summarize it: first you need to establish the notability of the company, then you need to find verifiable and reliable sources to back up the content of your article. That's basically all you need to get your article included into Wikipedia. Amsaim (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I've had enough go at creating the page, is it any better or does it need improving? Quiggers1P (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidently you did not read through Wikipedia's rules of article creation, and thus the page you recreated again merely contains unambiguous advertising and promotion. Chances are high that this page will be nominated for deletion again. Why don't you just thoroughly inform yourself on how to properly create a wikipedia article using the links I provided for you? Amsaim (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes but my article seemed to fit all of your links. It is notable it is any personal experiences etc and I had reliable sources! Is it just impossible to make a page on wikipedia? My friends did once, but then they were found to be connected and all got banned. Quiggers1P (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

MATURAM

Re this, are you able to understand the content of the article?--Jac16888^Talk 21:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

What is meant with "Re this"? You mean "in reference to this"? The article does not give any context whatsoever, so I placed the CSD#A1 tag on it. Amsaim (talk) 21:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I meant "in reference to". I'm asking if you understand the language the article is written in? Or is your deletion tag based on it not being in English--Jac16888^Talk 22:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I do not understand the language of the article. As such, the article does not give any context, hence the CSD#A1 tag. Apart from this, there are now 2 editors who seem to have different views on the nature of that language. One claims it to be Estonian, the other thinks it is Burmese. Google's auto-detect is clueless as to what this language is. All the same, this article and its creator merely serve as a disruption to wikipedia. Amsaim (talk) 22:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm aware of the language identification trouble, and the disruptiveness of the creator, however, you should be aware that we do not delete articles simply because they are not in english, the admin who just did shouldn't have done so, no doubt it was because they assumed you knew the language. We list them at WP:PNT untill it is determined if they should be kept--Jac16888^Talk 22:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Tata Magic, Magic Iris and Tata Venture

Tata Motors have launched many new vehicles at Delhi Auto Show, kindly use Google News to know more about these Cars. I started these new articles using other(Tata Ace) as draft, and was planning to add more data as soon as it is available (specifications, dimensions etc).I haven't added anything new, so i don't know how the new article is infringing copyright when i have used data from wikipedia itself. I will deal with this matter tomorrow as I am feeling a bit tired. --Anmol.2k4 (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Funke Akindele

I have rolled back your edit re-adding an Expand tag to Funke Akindele. Under the guidance at Template:Expand it states that the template should not be used on articles concurrently with stub templates, only for articles beyond stub length which still require expansion. Miyagawa (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of this rule. Thanks very much for the information. Amsaim (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Post about Dako1 at WP:AIV

Hi Amsaim. WP:AIV is not the best forum for the post you made there about Dako1. I have moved the post to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Dako1. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Fuhghettaboutit, thanks for moving it to the right forum. Amsaim (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Wasted Bandwidth

Re your message: Yup. I suspect that it is towards the end of the school day and the kids are bored. It seems to come in bursts, unfortunately. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Guvano

Looks like another admin beat me to it; thanks for the heads up, though! Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Amsaim (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

List of Mature Cartoon Series

Hi, Amsaim. I removed the A10 tag you placed on List of Mature Cartoon Series because {{Db-a10}} states the article tagged for deletion "does not expand upon, detail or improve information within the existing article". List of Mature Cartoon Series does attempt to detail, as it lists only animated series targetting adult viewers while List of animated television series lists all animated series.

I personally like the idea behind the article, but it is contestable because it doesn't state what qualifies a series for inclusion, so you're welcome to bring it up at AFD if you'd like. Liqudluck✽talk 01:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Liqudluck. This list does not expand upon the information within the existing article, neither does it give any additional detail whatsoever. All the article does is to add confusion to the matter by introducing the word "mature" into the article title, making the article ambiguous. The cartoons mentioned in the new article are already in the main List of animated television series article. Placing the article on Afd is a waste of bandwidth, as this is a clear case of a redundant article. Amsaim (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Looks like someone else nailed it...

...thanks for letting me know. Gawdalmighty, I wish folks like that would read the doggoned rules before slapping stuff like this on the site. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate use of speedy removal template.

Thanks for the heads up, but I am not the creator of the article in question.

There is sufficient information in the Richard Baker article to assert notablility, even if the article currently fails to meet wikipedia standards, hence the removal of your speedy nomination. I've tagged the article with a 'Like resume' template and will monitor the article for improvement and submit it for AFD if none comes.Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The CSD#G11 tag which was placed on that article is fully appropriate. The template text reads: "....pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service or person....". Since you have again removed the tag, and in order to avoid war-edit you will be reported to the admins. Amsaim (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Please read the text of User talk namespace template messages before using them. Template:Uw-speedy1 is for use on the user pages of people who have removed a speedy delete tag from pages they have created theirselves.

Also, read the text of the speedy deletion template itself. "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The issue here is not the tag I placed via Twinkle on your talk page. The issue that lead to this is your removal of the CSD#G11 tag from the Richard Baker (Businessman) article. While it is unfortunate that Twinkle doesn't fully give editors a good oversight over the effects of the tags (and I do regret and apologise for the placing of that tag on your talk page), yet this isnt't the issue here. Amsaim (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I removed the speedy delete tag because I didn't believe the article fitted those criteria. A couple of minutes on Google brings up multiple independent sources for Richard Baker... he's a pretty big name by all accounts. I agree that the page is terribly written, but there is a glimmer of a decent article there. Sorry for stepping on your toes! :) Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cat delete

I notice that NJA deleted the cat for you. I would have done it myself, but I was doing a complex history merge, and I couldn't deal with your message at the time. I wasn't trying to ignore you. Graham87 13:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

No probs. Thanks for the reply. Amsaim (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Richard Baker (Businessman)

Hi, the article is still undergoing the AFD process, having failed to reach consensus. As the original author did not come back to improve it, I took it upon myself to add references that establish notability as per WP:GNG. It's now a substantially different article. As the person who nominated the article for deletion in the first place, you might want to add a comment to the AFD discussion. Cheers, Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

This BLP article is of a non-notable person. The article merely presents a résumé of a non-notable person. A successful Afd doesn't give notability to a non-notable person. It is unfortunate that wikipedia is filled with articles of non-notable people. Presently, Wikipedia's BLP rules are subject to reform, this is why there is an ongoing open discussion about it. Hopefully at the end of the discussion community consensus will emerge that will make it impossible for such self-promotional articles to be included into Wikipedia. Amsaim (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, the AFD was closed in the mean-time. Curious response though. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

The Beam

Thanks for the update! I didn't know those D3 policies existed, but definitely helpful! The links you chose in your revision weren't where I wanted the disambig to go, so I ended up changing it to the instrument and tale directly. Silivrenion (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Right. I created The Beam (tale) as a stub. Hopefully more people will be able to add to it. Silivrenion (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Well done, that's a cool way to solve the issue :) Amsaim (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Re this

It's gone (; Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Amsaim (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Question

Hello, Amsaim. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Ayaan Hirsi Ali edit warring

Please be aware that you and Zencv (talk · contribs) are currently engaged in an edit war. Should this behavior persist, one or both of you may find yourselves blocked for edit warring in order to prevent further disruption to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali article. Please take time to discuss your issue on the article's talk page and possibly visit our third opinion or dispute resolution venues. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 01:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

An administrator's quote on this issue: You are never violating the three revert rule if you're reverting vandalism. Full reply on talk page]. Amsaim (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Update: after reporting the matter to AiN, it was established by consensus & actions taken by the admins, that my reverts were in line with Wikipedia's BLP & NPOV guidelines. Amsaim (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

First of all, please take some time to read WP:DTTR. It would be more helpful if you leave a proper message either in my talk page or in the talk page of the article, explaining why do you think that adding Islamophobia to the list here violates NPOV. I added the link as Islamophobia and Criticism of Islam often overlap. Or do you have an explanation why Irshad Manji, Wafa Sultan, Tasleema Nasreen and Criticism of Islam do not violate NPOV and Islamophobia does? Take some time to explain instead of dropping templates. Thanks Zencv ^Whisper 12:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Many thianks...

...off to clobber it again. Gawdalmighty, I wish folks like that would read the rles and not treat this site like a doggoned chalkboard. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

reply

how you gone deleted the page and you just got the work that i just did and now its up for deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrshistory2010 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

List of Wikipedias

Why you reverted my edit? Cross namespace links are not good. Articles should link to articles and pages from the Wikipedia namespace to Wikipedia pages. --Obersachse (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Kannst auch deutsch antworten. --Obersachse (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. Just posted a reply on your talk page. Amsaim (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Crossposting is bad, too. --Obersachse (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

The first posting concerning this issue was done by me on your talk page, so I am not the one "crossposting". Please do not post redundant postings on my talk page via copy & paste. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

That's not true. I wrote you at 15:16 and your answer on my user talk page was at 15:20. --Obersachse (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

My revert was done at 15:07, and I was in the process of posting a message on your talk page at the said time. So when I pressed "Save page", your message was already on my talk page 2 minutes earlier. Thus there was no crossposting done by either of us. Please do not take this issue any further. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 15:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Question about notability

Re your message: Paul Erik replied to you on his talk page with a very good explanation of why the article now meets the notability standards. The only thing I have to add is that the deletion log for the article doesn't give the whole story. The first two deletions were done on the same article creator and probably should have been labeled as CSD#A3, however, back then admins didn't have the fancy popup menu to fill in the deletion reasons like we do now. The fourth deletion was actually do to not only a copyright violation, but an AfD discussion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Amsaim (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Privileges,

I have several admin's pages watched, which is how I found this.

Since you have refused to listen to anything BMW is saying, let me repeat it for you, and make it rather hard, or impossible, to miss:

The majority of Wikipedia admins do not have admin privileges on Commons, which is where the images you are talking about were uploaded. This means, BMW is not able to delete the images you speak of, as he is not an admin on that sub-wiki, and is only an admin on Wikipedia.

There you have it. As he has been saying, it is your responsibility as an editor to alert the admins there by placing a speedy delete tag on the appropriate pages of the pictures you mentioned. BMW, as said above, can't delete them, as, as said, he does not have that right.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 07:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)