Talk:Joe Biden: Difference between revisions
Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
:I agree the description is misleading. But the CNBC article said Biden "campaigned on the federal government’s ability to curb the pandemic." He is now backtracking. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 20:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
:I agree the description is misleading. But the CNBC article said Biden "campaigned on the federal government’s ability to curb the pandemic." He is now backtracking. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 20:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Biden is not backtracking. That CNBC article then says {{tq|Those comments represent one of the most explicit acknowledgements to date from the Biden administration that it will need help from state and local governments in its efforts to curb the spread of Covid-19.}} as well as {{tq|The president on Monday reiterated some of the promises he made last week, including the federal government’s purchase of 500 million rapid coronavirus tests.}} It's not "backtracking", it's acknowledging that states have a role to play too. After all, he's just announced a new $137 million contract from the DoD.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-administration-announces-137m-deal-boost-production-key-covid-test-n1286767</ref> I agree with OuroborosCobra that the proposed addition is too much SYNTH. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
::Biden is not backtracking. That CNBC article then says {{tq|Those comments represent one of the most explicit acknowledgements to date from the Biden administration that it will need help from state and local governments in its efforts to curb the spread of Covid-19.}} as well as {{tq|The president on Monday reiterated some of the promises he made last week, including the federal government’s purchase of 500 million rapid coronavirus tests.}} It's not "backtracking", it's acknowledging that states have a role to play too. After all, he's just announced a new $137 million contract from the DoD.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-administration-announces-137m-deal-boost-production-key-covid-test-n1286767</ref> I agree with OuroborosCobra that the proposed addition is too much SYNTH. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
How about: "The Biden administration responded to the global spread of the COVID-19 Omicron variant in December 2021 by advocating for a state-level response over a federal level response.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Franck |first1=Thomas |title=Biden says Covid surge needs to be solved at state level, vows full federal support |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/27/biden-says-covid-surge-needs-to-be-solved-at-state-level-vows-full-federal-support.html |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=CNBC |date=27 December 2021}}</ref> Throughout the surge, the Biden administration has been criticized for a lack of COVID tests, exacerbating the spread of the Omicron variant. When questioned about the apparent shortage of tests, Jen Psaki replied, “Should we just send one to every American? Then what happens if every American has one test? How much does that cost and what happens after that?”<ref>{{cite news |title=Psaki on Covid tests: 'Should we just send one to every American?' |url=https://www.politico.com/video/2021/12/21/psaki-on-covid-tests-should-we-just-send-one-to-every-american-440759 |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=Politico |date=21 December 2021}}</ref>, causing backlash.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Seddiq |first1=Oma |title=Psaki responds to criticism over her dismissal of sending Americans COVID-19 tests |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/psaki-responds-to-criticism-over-dismissal-of-at-home-covid-19-tests-2021-12 |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=Business Insider |date=21 December 2021}}</ref> The Biden administration responded by promising an increased supply of at-home tests later in 2022.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Liptak |first1=Kevin |title=Biden concedes not enough has been done to expand Covid-19 testing capacity: 'We have more work to do' |url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/27/politics/biden-covid-governors/index.html |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=CNN |date=27 December 2021}}</ref> |
|||
In the midst of an all-time high of new COVID cases,<ref>{{cite news |title=Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=New York Times |date=30 December 2021}}</ref> the CDC revised their guidelines, recommending five days of quarantine rather than ten without requiring a negative COVID test.<ref>{{cite web |last1=CDC |title=CDC Updates and Shortens Recommended Isolation anNod Quarantine Period for General Population |url=https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s1227-isolation-quarantine-guidance.html |website=Center for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=30 December 2021}}</ref> This move was criticized by health experts who worry that without rapid testing, COVID-positive people may unknowingly spread COVID in workplaces under the recommended CDC guidelines. Others criticize the CDC for implementing this change following lobbying by the airline industry, leading to social media backlash against the federal government.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Foody |first1=Katie |last2=Miller |first2=Zeke |title=CDC move to shorten COVID isolation causes confusion and doubt |url=https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2021-12-28/cdc-move-to-shorten-covid-isolation-causes-confusion-and-doubt |access-date=30 December 2021 |agency=LA Times |issue=28 December 2021}}</ref>" –[[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:FC10:48C0:4858:9F69:7869:1B3|2600:1700:FC10:48C0:4858:9F69:7869:1B3]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:FC10:48C0:4858:9F69:7869:1B3|talk]]) 21:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{reftalk}} |
{{reftalk}} |
Revision as of 21:48, 30 December 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joe Biden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 7 days ![]() |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Joe Biden. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Joe Biden at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Joe Biden was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOTE: It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as:[[Talk:Joe Biden#Current consensus|current consensus]] item [n]
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to .
official 2021 White House portrait. (January 2021, April 2021)
4. The lead image is theOfficial portrait, 2021
. (April 2021)
who is
as opposed to serving as
when referring to Biden as the president. (RfC July 2021)
46th and current
as opposed to just 46th
when referring to Biden as the president. (RfC July 2021)
BIF in 4th lead paragraph
4th lead paragraph (which covers Biden's presidency) should mention passage of the BIF, his second major legislative achievement (after the American Rescue Plan). 142.126.87.150 (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, it is one of the major legislative acts of his presidency thus far. I think a good way to integrate this with the paragraph may be to mention the ARP and BIF together as part of Biden's Build Back Better Plan (link to article). This way when/if the Build Back Better Act passes it can be included as well. Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- It’s fine for now. When/if the BBB passes, we can rephrase the opening to how his first presidential year centered around passing his build back better agenda/domestic agenda, which included the ARP, BIF and BBB acts. Then segway into how he also issued a series of EOs and keep the rest as is. Davefelmer (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure why we can't just update it now to mention BIF, and again if/when BBB is signed into law? It may well be weeks or months before BBB clears the Senate, and there's no reason not to mentioned BIF until then... 142.126.87.150 (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry IP, but the current version has a strong consensus. Chopping and changing it to include everything he does in the lead does not. Davefelmer (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure why we can't just update it now to mention BIF, and again if/when BBB is signed into law? It may well be weeks or months before BBB clears the Senate, and there's no reason not to mentioned BIF until then... 142.126.87.150 (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- It’s fine for now. When/if the BBB passes, we can rephrase the opening to how his first presidential year centered around passing his build back better agenda/domestic agenda, which included the ARP, BIF and BBB acts. Then segway into how he also issued a series of EOs and keep the rest as is. Davefelmer (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Has it passed the US Senate? GoodDay (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Biden proposed the Build Back Better Plan, from which Congress passed the $1 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which Biden signed into law in November 2021.
- added. starship.paint (exalt) 02:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Consistency in presidential descriptions?
Not sure if this is the right place for this, kinda new as a Wikipedia contributor. I was thinking it would be a good idea to get some consistency in the descriptions/intros for politicians and how their offices are described
For example here is how Biden and Obama's tenure in the Senate are described.
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. (born November 20, 1942) is an American politician who is the 46th and current president of the United States. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 47th vice president from 2009 to 2017 under Barack Obama and represented Delaware in the United States Senate from 1973 to 2009.
Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American politician, author, and retired attorney who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, Obama was the first African-American president of the United States. He previously served as a U.S. senator from Illinois from 2005 to 2008 and as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004.
And here is how Kennedy's is described
John Fitzgerald Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963), often referred to by his initials JFK, was an American politician who served as the 35th president of the United States from 1961 until his assassination near the end of his third year in office. Kennedy served at the height of the Cold War, and the majority of his work as president concerned relations with the Soviet Union and Cuba. A Democrat, Kennedy represented Massachusetts in both houses of the U.S. Congress prior to his presidency.
Anyone else agree there should be some consistency? Please feel free to move this to the appropriate discussion area as well CoryJosh (talk) 23:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see why. Anyway, one was a U.S. senator, one was a U.S. and state senator, one was a U.S. senator and congressman,. JFK and obama were both serving senators when they became president, while biden was a former VP which is a higher position. There have not been many senators or former senators who became president anyway. TFD (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 November 2021
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The full stops of U.S. should be removed as per as MOS:US. Richard Michael William (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done: this page uses
U.S.
, either is fine according to MOS:US as long as consistency is kept. melecie t - 08:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Controversy
WP:DENY SPECIFICO talk 23:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Biden called a woman "damn liar", a "lying dog-faced pony soldier" and "full of s---" back in 2020. [1] [2] --Kotys ek Beos (talk) 18:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Allegations unpublished by RS ought to not be here, no? Also, it does seem like OP wants to push an obvious narrative counterproductive to the idea of Wikipedia. (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't need to search hard for sources - it was widely reported. And Fox News definitely covered the statements extensively. And I can hear the protests and groaning now, but Fox News is a Wikipedia reliable source. But other news sources reported the statements as well. It's not like the statements are secret or anything.BarbecuePorkRinds (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC) I should also note that the Wikipedia article on Donald Trump has an entire section dedicated to his supposed racist statements, and he didn't say anything as blatant as many of the statements made by President Biden. Wikipedia should not have a double standard with one set of criteria for conservative politicians and another for liberal politicians. BarbecuePorkRinds (talk) 14:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
IMHO, if an RFC isn't opened up on this topic? Then the entire 2-week old discussion should be hatted. GoodDay (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC) |
- What is an RFC, and how is it opened? BarbecuePorkRinds (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- RFC is jargon for Request for Comment; click that link for more information, especially if you don't intend to offer sources as requested. 331dot (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- What is an RFC, and how is it opened? BarbecuePorkRinds (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Omicron surge
It's worth it to mention Biden's response to the current Omicron surge. He argued that the federal government cannot intervene in Omicron. Instead, he argued intervention happens at a state level. This is despite cases rising in all states, causing outrage. 2600:1700:FC10:48C0:4858:9F69:7869:1B3 (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
"In response to the surge of the COVID-19 Omicron variant in December, Biden advocated a state-level response over a federal response.[1] Soon after, the CDC revised their guidelines recommending quarantine for five days rather than ten. [2] By the end of December, the United States reported an all-time high of new COVID cases.[3]"
- His comment was misconstrued as federal abandonment of states. soibangla (talk) 19:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- There's a bit of WP:SYNTHESIS going on here by ordering these statements in a way that one seems to lead to the other, implying one is the result of the other. The updated CDC guideline, for example, didn't start the Omicron surge being experienced at the end of December as the CDC guidance shortening the quarantine period was itself also done at the end of December, after we were already well into the Omicron surge. Additionally, that surge is being seen all over the world, and not just in countries where the US CDC has authority (i.e. the US). This isn't to say that reliably sourced criticism of Biden's response cannot be included, but it must be done in such a way as to not imply the type of cause/effect relationship that the proposed text suggests. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 20:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree the description is misleading. But the CNBC article said Biden "campaigned on the federal government’s ability to curb the pandemic." He is now backtracking. TFD (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Biden is not backtracking. That CNBC article then says
Those comments represent one of the most explicit acknowledgements to date from the Biden administration that it will need help from state and local governments in its efforts to curb the spread of Covid-19.
as well asThe president on Monday reiterated some of the promises he made last week, including the federal government’s purchase of 500 million rapid coronavirus tests.
It's not "backtracking", it's acknowledging that states have a role to play too. After all, he's just announced a new $137 million contract from the DoD.[4] I agree with OuroborosCobra that the proposed addition is too much SYNTH. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Biden is not backtracking. That CNBC article then says
How about: "The Biden administration responded to the global spread of the COVID-19 Omicron variant in December 2021 by advocating for a state-level response over a federal level response.[5] Throughout the surge, the Biden administration has been criticized for a lack of COVID tests, exacerbating the spread of the Omicron variant. When questioned about the apparent shortage of tests, Jen Psaki replied, “Should we just send one to every American? Then what happens if every American has one test? How much does that cost and what happens after that?”[6], causing backlash.[7] The Biden administration responded by promising an increased supply of at-home tests later in 2022.[8]
In the midst of an all-time high of new COVID cases,[9] the CDC revised their guidelines, recommending five days of quarantine rather than ten without requiring a negative COVID test.[10] This move was criticized by health experts who worry that without rapid testing, COVID-positive people may unknowingly spread COVID in workplaces under the recommended CDC guidelines. Others criticize the CDC for implementing this change following lobbying by the airline industry, leading to social media backlash against the federal government.[11]" –2600:1700:FC10:48C0:4858:9F69:7869:1B3 (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Franck, Thomas (27 December 2021). "Biden says Covid surge needs to be solved at state level, vows full federal support". CNBC. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ CDC. "CDC Updates and Shortens Recommended Isolation anNod Quarantine Period for General Population". Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count". New York Times. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-administration-announces-137m-deal-boost-production-key-covid-test-n1286767
- ^ Franck, Thomas (27 December 2021). "Biden says Covid surge needs to be solved at state level, vows full federal support". CNBC. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Psaki on Covid tests: 'Should we just send one to every American?'". Politico. 21 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ Seddiq, Oma (21 December 2021). "Psaki responds to criticism over her dismissal of sending Americans COVID-19 tests". Business Insider. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ Liptak, Kevin (27 December 2021). "Biden concedes not enough has been done to expand Covid-19 testing capacity: 'We have more work to do'". CNN. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count". New York Times. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ CDC. "CDC Updates and Shortens Recommended Isolation anNod Quarantine Period for General Population". Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ Foody, Katie; Miller, Zeke. "CDC move to shorten COVID isolation causes confusion and doubt". No. 28 December 2021. LA Times. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class U.S. Congress articles
- High-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons
- B-Class Joe Biden articles
- Top-importance Joe Biden articles
- WikiProject Joe Biden articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Top-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Top-importance
- B-Class Delaware articles
- Mid-importance Delaware articles
- WikiProject Delaware articles
- B-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- B-Class U.S. Presidents articles
- Top-importance U.S. Presidents articles
- WikiProject U.S. Presidents articles
- B-Class United States Government articles
- Top-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- B-Class American politics articles
- Top-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class college football articles
- Bottom-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles
- B-Class Science Policy articles
- High-importance Science Policy articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press