Slavs

"Slav" redirects here. For the former Israeli settlement, see Slav (settlement).

Distribution of Slavic people by language

The Slavic peoples are a linguistic and ethnic branch of Indo-European peoples, in Europe they constitute largest IE baranch, roughly a third of the population on around half of area. Since emerging from their original homeland they have inhabited most of eastern Central Europe, Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Many have later settled in Northern Asia and migrated to other parts of the world.

Modern Slavic are connected by speaking closely related Slavic languages, and also by a sense of common tradition, identity and history going back 10 ky, which is present among Slavic peoples.

Slavic peoples are traditionally divided along linguistic lines into West Slavic (including Czechs, Poles and Slovaks), East Slavic (including Belarusians, Russians, and Ukrainians), and South Slavic (including Bosniaks, Bulgarians, Croats, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Serbs and Slovenians). For a more comprehensive list, see Ethno-cultural subdivisions.

Origin of the term Slav

The origin of the word Slav remains controversial. Excluding the ambiguous mention by Ptolemy of tribes Stavanoi and Soubenoi, the earliest references of "Slavs" under this name are from the 6th century. The word is written variously as Sklabenoi, Sklauenoi, or Sklabinoi in Byzantine Greek, and as Sclaueni, Sclauini, or Sthlaueni in Latin. The oldest documents written in Old Slavonic and dating from the 9th century attest slověne.

There are two alternative scholarly theories as to the origin of the Slavs ethnonym, both very tentative: According to the first theory, it derives from a Proto-Indo-European *(s)lawos, cognate to Greek λᾱ(ϝ)ός "population, people", which itself has no commonly accepted etymology. The second theory (forwarded by e.g. Max Vasmer) suggests that the word originated as a river name (compare the etymology of the Volcae), comparing it with such cognates as Latin cluo ("to wash"), a root not known to have been continued in Slavic, however, and appearing in meanings of "to clean, to scour" in Baltic.

Folk etymologies and scholars such as Roman Jacobson traditionally link the name either with the word sláva ("glory", "fame", hypothetically reconstructed IE root *kleu-) or with the word slovo ("word, talk"). Thus slověne would mean "people who speak (the same language)", i.e. people who understand each other, as opposed to the Slavic word for foreign nations, nemtsi, meaning "speechless people" (from Slavic němi - mute, silent, dumb), as for example in Polish: Niemcy is Germans.

The English word slave is derived from Middle Latin sclavus, in turn derived from the ethnonym discussed above, because of the large number of Slavs captured during the raids of Turkic nomads and sold to Europe and the Arab world through slave markets along various routes. (See saqaliba for more information.)

Proto-Slavic language

Main article: Proto-Slavic language

The ancestor of the Proto-Slavic language branched off at some uncertain time in an disputed location from common Proto-Indo-European (possibly passing through a common Proto-Balto-Slavic stage). Looking at the protolanguage tree it is the last protolanguage 'branched of" of IE tree. The R1a1 point to Slavic population as most homogenic geneticaly originators of IE family.

The Slavic language group is now categorized with the satem or eastern isogloss of the Indo-European language family, along with the Baltic and Indo-Iranian groups. This is in contrast with the western or centum division that includes Romance, Germanic and Celtic and Armenian languages.

According to a popular view, "the Indo-Europeans who remained after the migrations became speakers of Balto-Slavic" [1]. Proto-Slavic proper, defined as the last stage of the language preceding the split of the historical Slavic languages, predates the 7th century, and was likely spoken during the 5th and 6th century.

Genetic origins

The modern Slavic peoples come from a wide variety of genetic backgrounds, attesting the complexity of the ethnogenetic processes in Eastern Europe . The frequency of Haplogroup R1a[2] ranges from 56.4% of the population in Poland and 54% in Ukraine, to 15.2% in Macedonia, 14.7% in Bulgaria and 12.1% in Herzegovina.^{I II} Haplogroup R1a may be connected to the spread of Proto-Indo-Europeans (see Kurgan hypothesis for more information).

Haplogroup I1b is the most common haplogroup among the people of former Yugoslavia (63.8% Herzegovinians, 52.2% Bosnians, 32.2% mainland Croatians). A new study (Rebala et al. 2007) studied several Slavic populations with the aim of localizing the Proto-Slavic homeland. A significant finding of this study is that: Two genetically distant groups of Slavic populations were revealed: One encompassing all Western-Slavic, Eastern-Slavic, and two Southern - Slavic populations, and one encompassing all remaining Southern Slavs.” According to the authors most Slavic populations have similar Y chromosome pools, and this similarity can be traced to an origin in middle Dnieper basin of the Ukraine from Ukrainian LGM refuge 15 kya.

However, southern Slavic populations such as Serbians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, and Bosnians are separated from the tight cluster of Slavic populations. According to the authors this phenomenon is explained by “the contribution of the Y chromosomes of peoples who settled in the region before the Slavic expansion to the genetic heritage of Southern Slavs.”

For additional discussion of these haplogroups, see Genetic history of Europe and articles on particular haplogroups.

Origins and Slavic homeland debate

The location of the speakers of pre-Proto-Slavic and Proto-Slavic is subject to considerable debate. Serious candidates are cultures on the territories of modern Belarus, Poland and Ukraine. The proposed frameworks are:

1. Lusatian culture hypothesis: The pre-Proto-Slavs were present in north-eastern Central Europe since at least the late 2nd millennium BC, and were the bearers of the Lusatian culture and later the Przeworsk culture (part of the Chernyakhov culture).
2. Milograd culture hypothesis: The pre-Proto-Slavs (or Balto-Slavs) were the bearers of the Milograd culture
3. Chernoles culture hypothesis: The pre-Proto-Slavs were the bearers of the Chernoles culture of northern Ukraine

The starting point in the autochtonic/allochtonic debate was the year 1745, when Johann Christoph de Jordan published De Originibus Slavicis. From the 19th century onwards, the debate became politically charged, particularly in connection with the history of the Partitions of Poland, and German imperialism known as Drang nach Osten. Generally, both Germanics and Slavic peoples want to be autochthonic on land at the river Vistula.

Contemporary scholarship in general has moved away from the idea of monolithic nations and the Urheimat debates of the 19th and early 20th centuries, and its focus of interest is that of a process of ethnogenesis, regarding competing Urheimat scenarios as false dichotomies.

Autochthonic theory

The autochthonic theory holds that the proto-Slavs are native to the area of modern Poland, where they are supposed to have lived before the 5th century. The theory was postulated by Wincenty Kadłubek in Cronicae et gesta ducum sive principum Polonorum. Other notable proponents of the theory are Józef Kostrzewski, Witold Hensel, Konrad Jażdżewski, Witold Mańczak, Janusz Andrzej Piontek Robert Dąbrowski, Tadeusz Makiewicz , Tadeusz Malinowski , Henryk Mamzer, Zofia Kurnatowska, Stanisław Kurnatowski, Stanisław Tabaczyński and Lech Leciejewicz, Aleksander Brückner.

Several arguments are used in support of the theory:

• No remains or traces of Germanic tribes were reported on West Slavic territory, neither enclaves nor medieval historical records. Instead Slavic tribes slowly disappeared from the area. Polabian Slavs, for instance, had become extinct in the 18th century, after having lived in the area for over a thousand years. Upper and Lower Sorbs still live in the area, and have a distinct language and distinct customs and traditions from their non-Slavic neighbours.
• "Autochtonic historiography" written in the 12th century.
• Medieval authors, who refer to the Vandals from Vandalia as Slowianie. There are no listed references to when medieval authors identify Vandals from Vandalia as Teutons, before Teutons conquered their lands.

• The early medieval border between the Frankish/Teutonic empire and Slavic territory matches the border of the Roman conquest. The West Slavic tribes remained on territory that wasn't conquered by the Romans. The Teutonic tradition draws from the Holy Roman Empire.

• Microsatellite variance, the distribution of genetic marker R1a1 and Slavic kurgan traditions.
• Germanic languages are more similar to Slavic languages than to Baltic languages. This would imply that in prehistoric times, Slavic languages developed between Germanic languages and Baltic languages.

The allochtonic theory thesis are now included with newly formed Paleolithic Continuity Theory caled also indigenism. Which not only debuke allochtonic flase ideas but extend Słowian autochtonism in Central Europe to paleolithic.

Allochthonic theory

In scholarly community nobody today hold the allochtonic theory views, new data rejecting it completely. It may be however describe it from historical point to show how data may be manipulated to fulfill political goals of panagermanizm.

The allochthonic theory holded that the Slavic peoples immigrated to the area of modern Poland during or after the 5th century. The theory was first expounded by Theodor Mommsen, with his republishing of Getica. Other notable proponents of the theory were Gustaf Kossinna, Bolko von Richthofen, Hans Schleiff, Kazimierz Godłowski, Michał Parczewski.

• Tadeusz Makiewicz writes: Great migrations of the 5th century did not bypass the Polish lands. (...) In effect an almost complete depopulation of the Polish lands took place. This void was quickly to be filled with new arrivals. The depopulation theory

The basic thesis of the theory was:

• In great migrations of the 5th century Germanics run out of Central Europe
• Almost complete depopulation of the Polish lands took place
• This void was quickly to be filled with new arrivals
• Since emerging from their original homeland in the early 6th century, they have inhabited most of eastern Central Europe, Eastern Europe and the Balkans.

Earliest accounts

Pliny the Elder and Ptolemy mention a tribe of the Venedes around the river Vistula. The lands east of the Rhine, Elbe, Oder, and west of the Vistula river were referred to as Magna Germania by Tacitus in AD 98. Tacitus. Romans occupied the land west of the Elbe.

From Romanticism, the allochthonic school theorem is that the 6th century authors re-applied the ethnonym to hitherto unknown Slavic tribes, whence the later designation "Wends" for Slavic tribes, and medieval legends purporting a connection between Poles and Vandals.

The autochthonic school postulates that the Venedes of Tacitus and the "Slavs proper" between the 1st and the 6th centuries coalesced into the historical Slavic ethnicities.

The Slavs were "known to other people" as those tribes located between the Vistula and Dnepr until the middle of the 1st century BCE. After that they expanded to the Elbe (Labe) River and Adriatic Sea and down the Danube.

The Slavs under name of Venets, the Ants and the Sklavens make their first appearance in Byzantine records in the early 6th century. Byzantine historiographers under Justinian I (527-565), such as Procopius of Caesarea, Jordanes and Theophylact Simocatta describe tribes emerging from the area of the Carpathian Mountains, the lower Danube and the Black Sea, invading the Danubian provinces of the Eastern Empire.

Jordanes mentions that the Venets sub-divided into three groups: the Venets, the Ants and the Sklavens (Sclovenes, Sklavinoi), collectively called Spores. The Byzantine term Sklavinoi was loaned as Saqaliba by medieval Arab historiographers.

Scenarios of ethnogenesis

Eastern Europe in the 3rd century AD:

  Chernyakhov culture

  Przeworsk culture

  Wielbark Culture (associated with the Goths)

  a Baltic culture (Aesti/Yotvingian?)

  Debczyn culture

  Roman Empire

Historical distribution of the Slavic languages. The area shaded in light purple is the Prague-Penkov-Kolochin complex of cultures of the 6th to 7th c. AD, likely corresponding to the spread of Slavic tribes at the time. The area shaded in darker red indicates the core area of Slavic river names (after EIEC p. 524ff.)

The Globular Amphora culture stretches from the middle Dniepr to the Elbe in the late 4th and early 3rd millennia BC. It has been suggested as the locus of a Germano-Balto-Slavic continuum (compare Germanic substrate hypothesis), but the identification of its bearers as Indo-Europeans is uncertain. The area of this culture contains typical for IE originators numerous tumuli.

The Chernoles culture (8th to 3rd c. BC, sometimes associated with the "Scythian farmers" of Herodotus) is "sometimes portrayed as either a state in the development of the Slavic languages or at least some form of late Indo-European ancestral to the evolution of the Slavic stock" The Milograd culture (700 BC - 100 AD), centered roughly on present day Belarus, north of the contemporaneous Chernoles culture, have also been proposed as ancestral to either Slavs or Balts.

The ethnic composition of the bearers of the Przeworsk culture (2nd c. BC to 4th c. AD, associated with the Lugii) of central and southern Poland, northern Slovakia and of Ukraine, including the Zarubintsy culture (2nd c. BC to 2nd c. AD, also connected with the Bastarnae tribe) and the Oksywie culture are other candidates.

The area of southern Ukraine is known to have been inhabited by Scythian and Sarmatian tribes prior to the foundation of the Gothic kingdom. Early Slavic stone stelae found in the middle Dniestr region are markedly different from the Scythian and Sarmatian stelae found in the Crimea.

The (Gothic) Wielbark Culture displaced the eastern Oksywie part of the Przeworsk culture from the 1st century AD. While the Chernyakhov culture (2nd to 5th c. AD, identified with the multi-ethnic kingdom established by the Goths immigrating from the Wielbark culture) leads to the decline of the late Sarmatian culture in the 2nd to 4th centuries, the western part of the Przeworsk culture remains intact until the 4th century, and the Kiev culture flourishes during the same time, in the 2nd-5th c. AD. This latter culture is recognized as the direct predecessor of the Prague-Korchak and Pen'kovo cultures (6th-7th c. AD), the first archaeological cultures the bearers of which are undisputedly identified as Slavic. Proto-Slavic is thus likely to have reached its final stage in the Kiev area; there is, however, substantial disagreement in the scientific community over the identity of the Kiev culture's predecessors, with some scholars tracing it from the Ruthenian Milograd culture, others from the "Ukrainian" Chernoles and Zarubintsy cultures and still others from the "Polish" Przeworsk culture. The Kiev culture was overrun by the Huns around 400 AD, which may have triggered the Proto-Slavic expansion to the historical locations of the Slavic languages.

Slavs in the historical period

Acording to allochtonic view: Slavs emerged from obscurity when the westward movement of Germans and Celts in the 5th and 6th centuries AD (necessitated by the onslaught of people from Siberia and Eastern Europe: Huns, Avars, Bulgars and Magyars) started the great migration of the Slavs, who settled the lands abandoned by Germanic tribes fleeing the Huns and their allies: westward into the country between the Oder and the Elbe-Saale line; southward into Bohemia, Moravia, much of present day Austria, the Pannonian plain and the Balkans; and northward along the upper Dnieper river.

A romanticized painting of Slavs during the Middle Ages.

6th century

Around the 6th century, Slavs appeared on Byzantine borders in great numbers. The Byzantine records note that after they marched through grass wouldn't regrow under their footprints. After a military movement even the Peloponnese was reported to have Slavic settlements. This southern movement is commonly seen as an invasive expansion, but some consider it to be a return (the Dunabe origin/Ethnogenesis conception).

When their migratory movements ended, there appeared among the Slavs the first rudiments of state organizations, each headed by a prince with a treasury and a defense force. Moreover, it was the beginnings of class differentiation, with nobles who pledged allegiance to the Frankish and Holy Roman Emperors.

Karantania in today's Austria and Slovenia was one Slavic state; very old also are the Principality of Nitra and the Moravian principality (see under Great Moravia). In this period, there existed central Slavic groups and states such as the Balaton Principality, but the subsequent expansion of the Magyars, as well as the Germanisation of Austria, separated the northern and southern Slavs. The First Bulgarian Empire, which by the late 9th century became linguistically Slavicized, was founded in 681.

In the early history of South Slavs, and continuing into the Dark Ages, non-Slavic groups were sometimes dissimilated by Slavic-speaking populations: the Bulgars became Slavicized and their Turkic tongue disappeared (except for a number of words). Many of the ancient Thracians in the central and eastern Balkans, some of them previously Romanized or Hellenized, became Slavicized since the 6th century.

In other cases, the Slavs assimilated other groups such as Vlachs, Magyars, Greeks, Italians, Illyrians in the western Balkans, Pechenegs, Cumans, Tatars, and other populations from the Eurasian steppe.

In the 7th century, the Frankish merchant Samo, who supported the Slavs fighting their Avar rulers, became the ruler of the first known Slav state in Central Europe, which, however, most probably did not outlive its founder and ruler.

19th century

Because of the vastness and diversity of the territory occupied by Slavic people, there were several centers of Slavic consolidation. In the 19th century, Pan-Slavism developed as a movement among intellectuals, scholars, and poets, but it rarely influenced practical politics and didn't find support in all nations that had Slavic origins. Pan-Slavism became compromised when Russian Empire started to use it as an ideology justifying its territorial conquests in Central Europe as well as subjugation of other ethnic groups of Slavic origins such as Poles or Ukrainians, and the ideology became associated with Russian imperialism. The common Slavic experience of communism combined with the repeated usage of the ideology by Soviet propaganda after World War II within the Eastern bloc (Warsaw Pact) was a forced high-level political and economic hegemony of the USSR dominated by Russians, and as such despised by the rest of the conquered nations. A notable political union of the 20th century that covered many South Slavs was Yugoslavia, but it was broken apart as well.

Slavic peoples in the World

Tens of millions Slavs have moved to other places in World. Many settled in Northern Asia, the Americas and other parts of the world.

Slavic populations under foreign rule

In the course of their history, many Slavic-speaking communities came under foreign rule for longer or shorter periods. Poland underwent partition, German-speaking empires appeared to absorb the Czechs for many centuries, and the Ottomans in their hey-day dominated the Balkan Slavs. Even the East Slavs had to submit to the Tatar yoke after the Mongol invasion of Rus.

The Slavs living in Brandenburg and Pomerania were exterminated or assimilated by Germans in the course of the Drang nach Osten; Turkish incursions suppressed the regional hegemonies of Bulgarian and Serbian speakers; Poland suffered decline, partition and extinction as a separate national state in the 18th century. Until the 20th century, certain speech-groups (such as speakers of Slovenian) lacked the resources to establish their own distinctive independent nation-states. Other communities (speakers of Sorbian or of Kashubian, for example) remain as minorities in the current system of nation-states.

Some speech-communities have long stood under the influence of others -- even other Slavs: speakers of Ukrainian and Belarusian came under Polish and/or Russian rule; German-speaking overlords have long dominated the Sorbian-speakers. In the case of West Slavic speakers, originally kindred languages diverged when the Poles, Czechs and Slovaks became parts of different countries (Poland, Bohemia, Kingdom of Hungary, respectively), Slovak becoming considerably influenced by Czech after 1400/1500. A political division (Austria, Kingdom of Hungary) also marks the now well-established border between the Slovenian and Croatian language areas, even if some bordering dialects of the two languages indicate an almost smooth transition.

Despite their frequent lack of political power, Slavs demonstrated resilience, sometimes culturally taking over foreign political rulers, as in Bulgaria, where originally Bulgar overlords became Slavicized. Similarly, in the Republic of Dubrovnik, the locally spoken Slavic language became an official language in parallel to Ragusan Dalmatian and Latin. Even under the Ottoman Empire, south-eastern Europe, except for Greece proper and Albanian, Romanian and Hungarian areas, remained Slavic speaking. In the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, a Ruthenian dialect was an official language.

Nazi Germany, whose proponents claimed a racial superiority for the Germanic people, particularly over Semitic and Slavic people, plotted an enslavement of the Slavic people, and the reduction of their numbers by killing the majority of the population. As a result, a large number of people considered by the Nazis to have Slavic origins were slain during World War II.

Only centrally located Slavic peoples were never, for period longer than one generation(~20y), ruled by non Slavic minorities. In those areas we observe the concentration of genes of IE originators, the most common to other Slavic groups.

Religion and alphabet

Slavs gradually adopted Christianity between 6th and 10th century, and consequently the old Slavic religion was suppressed. The two main Christian denominations with Slavs are Eastern Orthodox and Greek or Roman Catholic, while a few are Protestant or Muslim. The delineations by nationality can be very sharp. In many Slavic ethnic groups the vast majority of religious people share the same religion, although many are atheist or agnostic; in the latter cases people still may traditionally associate themselves with a particular religion in a cultural and historical sense.

1. Those who are mainly Eastern Orthodox or/and Uniate:

• Russians
• Ukrainians
• Belarusians
• Serbs
• Pannonian Rusyns
• Rusyns
• Bulgarians
• Macedonians
• Montenegrins

2. Those who are mainly Roman Catholic with small Protestant minorities:

• Poles
• Silesians
• Kashubians
• Czechs
• Moravians
• Slovaks
• Slovenes
• Croats
• Krashovans

3. Those who are mainly Muslim:

• Bosniaks
• Gorani

4. Those who are a religious mixture:

• Sorbs (Catholic/Protestant)
• Yugoslavs (Catholic/Orthodox/Muslim)

The Orthodox/Catholic religious divisions become further exacerbated by the use of the Cyrillic alphabet by the Orthodox and Greek Catholics and of the Roman alphabet by Roman Catholics. However, the Serbian language (including Montenegrin) can be written using both the Cyrillic and Roman alphabets . There is also a Latinic script to write in Belarusian, called the Lacinka alphabet. The Bosnian language has at times been written using the Arabic alphabet (mostly in Muslim documents), but it now uses the Roman (in Bosniak, Croat, and Serb areas) and Cyrillic alphabet (in Serb areas).

Ethno-cultural subdivisions

Slavs are customarily divided into three major subgroups: East Slavs, West Slavs, and South Slavs, each with a different and a diverse background based on unique history, religion and culture of particular Slavic group within them. The East Slavs may all be traced to Slavic-speaking populations that were loosely organized under the Kievan Rus' empire beginning in the 10th century A.D. Almost all of the South Slavs can be traced to ethnic Slavs who mixed with the local population of the Balkans (Illyrians, Dacians and Getae) and with later invaders from the East (Bulgars, Avars, and Alans), then fell under the hegemony of the Ottoman Empire. The West Slavs do not share either of these backgrounds, as they expanded to the West and integrated into the cultural sphere of Western (Roman Catholic) Christianity around this timeframe.

Please note that some of the following subdivisions remain highly debatable, particularly for smaller groups and national minorities.

East Slavs

Main article: East Slavs

• Russians
  • Pomors
  • Lipovan Russians
• Ukrainians
  • Poleszuks ²
• Rusyns ³
  • Bojko
  • Huculs
  • Lemko
• Belarusians
  • Poleszuks ²

West Slavs

Main article: West Slavs

• Lechitic group
  • Poles
    • Masovians
    • Polans
    • Vistulans
  • Silesians ⁴
  • Pomeranians
    • Kashubians ⁴
    • Slovincians
  • Polabians ^†
    • Obodrites/Abodrites ^†
    • Veleti ^†
    • Volinians (Velunzani) ^†
    • Pyritzans (Prissani) ^†
• Czech-Slovak group
  • Czechs
  • Moravians ⁵
  • Slovaks
  • Pannonian Rusyns ¹
• Sorbs (Serbo-Lusatians)
  • Milceni (Upper Sorbs)
  • Lusatians (Lower Sorbs)

South Slavs

Main article: South Slavs

• Eastern (Bulgaro-Macedonian) group
  • Bulgarians
    • Pomaks (Muslim Bulgarians)
    • Palćene (Banat Bulgarians)
    • Bessarabian Bulgarians
    • Anatolian Bulgarians^†
    • Shopi⁶
  • Macedonians (ethnic group)
    • Torbesh (Muslim Macedonians)

• Western group
  • Slovenians
    • Karantanians^†
  • Serbs
    • Torlaks⁷
  • Montenegrins⁸
  • Croats
    • Janjevci (Catholic Slavs in Kosovo)
    • Molise Croats (in eastern Italy)
    • Krashovans (Croats in Romania)
    • Burgenland Croats (in Austria)
    • Bunjevci ⁹
    • Šokci ⁹
  • Bosniaks
  • Gorani ¹⁰
  • Yugoslavs (mostly in Serbia, Bosnia, few in Croatia) ¹²

^† Extinct
¹ Also considered part of Rusyns
² Considered transitional between Ukrainians and Belarusians
³ Also considered part of Ukrainians
⁴ Also considered part of Poles
⁵ Today, often considered part of Czechs, originally closer to Slovaks

⁶ Most Shopi self-declare as Bulgarians. Cognate with Torlaks.
⁷ Most Torlaks self-declare as Serbs. Cognate with Shopi.

⁸ Some opt Serb ethnicity, with a historical tradition, dating back to the Serb tribes that settled Montenegro many centuries ago. While others opt for Montenegrin ethnicity, also historically emphasised, but used ubiquitiously along with Serb one. Some of the ethnic Montenegrins, mostly supporters of Montenegrin independence and adherents of Montenegrin Orthodox Church call their native language Montenegrin, considering it a separate language from Serbian.

⁹ Both occur widely in northeastern Croatia and also in northern Serbia; their Ikavian dialect is subequal as southern Croats in Hercegovina and Dalmatian mainland from where they once emigrated. Considered part of Croats by most of them, although recently (since Yugoslav disaster) some within Serbia consider themselves a separate peoples

¹⁰ These Gorani are Slavs in Kosovo; but not to be confound with other Gorani (or Gorinci) in the highlands of western Croatia (Gorski Kotar county).

¹¹ A census category in former Yugoslavia rather than an ethnic group in the strict sense. Most Slavic Muslims now opt for Bosniak ethnicity, but some still use the "Muslim" designation.

¹² This identity continues to be used by a minority throughout the former Yugoslav republics. The nationality is also declared by diasporans living in the USA and Canada. There are a multitude of reasons as to why people prefer this affiliation, some published on the article.

Note: Besides ethnic groups, Slavs often identify themselves with the local geographical region in which they live. Some of the major regional South Slavic groups include: Zagorci in northern Croatia, Istrani in westernmost Croatia, Dalmatinci in southern Croatia, Boduli in Adriatic islands, Slavonci in eastern Croatia, Bosanci in Bosnia, Hercegovci in southern Bosnia (Herzegovina), Krajišnici in western Bosnia, Semberci, Srbijanci, Šumadinci in central Serbia, Vojvođani in northern Serbia, Sremci, Bačvani, Banaćani, Sandžaklije (Muslims in Serbia/Montenegro border), Kosovci, Crnogorci, Bokelji in southwest Montenegro, Trakiytci in Upper Thracian Lowlands, Dobrudzhantci in north-east Bulgarian region , Balkandzhiiin Central Balkan Mountains, Miziytci in nort Bulgarian region, Pirinski Macedonci in Blagoevgrad Province, Rupchi, etc.

Another interesting note is that the very term Slavic itself was registered in the US census of 2000 by more than 127,000 residents.

Notes

• ^I Full paper "High-Resolution Phylogenetic Analysis of Southeastern Europe"
• ^II Abstract "High-Resolution Phylogenetic Analysis of Southeastern Europe"

References

==

croats rule over no man !!!!!!!!!!!!!

croats are the worst!!!!!!!!!

Gallery

• 
  Three generations of a Russian family, ca. 1910
• 
  1961 USSR postage stamp depicting Belarusian traditional costumes
• Ukrainians in traditional dress
  Ukrainians in traditional dress
• Slovaks in Serbia wearing traditional dress
  Slovaks in Serbia wearing traditional dress
• Girl in Upper Silesian dress from Mysłowice, 2006
  Girl in Upper Silesian dress from Mysłowice, 2006
• 
  National costume of Lusatian Sorbs as traditionally worn in the northern part of Lusatia
• 
  National Kashubian costume
• 
  Serbian bagpiper in traditional attire wearing opanci and šajkača
• A Bokelj in traditional garb
  A Bokelj in traditional garb

See also

• Slavic mythology
• Gord (Slavic settlement)
• Early East Slavs
• Lech, Czech and Rus
• Pan-Slavism
• Pan-Slavic colours
• East Slavs
• West Slavs
• South Slavs

External links

• The Name SLAV by B. Philip Lozinski.
• The Slavonic Antiquity: Scythians, Sarmatians, Meotians and Slavs by Sergei V. Rjabchikov.
• FROM PROTO-INDO-EUROPEAN TO SLAVIC, by Frederik Kortlandt.
• THE ORIGIN OF THE BALTIC, GERMAN AND SLAVIC PEOPLE. THE ICELAND AGES
• SLOVENI: UNDE ORTI ESTIS? SLOVÁCI, KDE SÚ VAŠE KORENE?, by Cyril A. Hromník (mainly in Slova).
• Site about Slavics, Slavic Countries, Cultures, Languages, etc (mainly in Russian)
• "The Genetic Legacy of Paleolithic Homo sapiens sapiens in Extant Europeans: A Y Chromosome Perspective"