Jump to content

User talk:Truco: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 297: Line 297:
== JBL ==
== JBL ==
Please explain to me you edits. His ringame is NOT John "Bradshaw" Layfield (JBL). His ring name is just John "Bradshaw" Layfield. JBL is just shorthand or a nickname. It's the same way Montel Vontavious Porter is sometimes called MVP. JBL is not part of his '''ring name''' and thus should not be in the '''ring name''' section. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">TJ</font>]] [[User talk:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">Spyke</font>]]</span>''' 00:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Please explain to me you edits. His ringame is NOT John "Bradshaw" Layfield (JBL). His ring name is just John "Bradshaw" Layfield. JBL is just shorthand or a nickname. It's the same way Montel Vontavious Porter is sometimes called MVP. JBL is not part of his '''ring name''' and thus should not be in the '''ring name''' section. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">TJ</font>]] [[User talk:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">Spyke</font>]]</span>''' 00:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

==Randy Orn==

I feel this should remain to stand, as it was officially announced by Vickie Guerrero that Randy Orn would be competing in the WWE title match at Backlash.

Revision as of 17:36, 7 April 2009

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

TFA

Thank you for No Way Out (2004)! Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

and again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Truco
User_talk:Truco
Special:Contributions/Truco
User:Truco/Sandbox
Special:Prefixindex/User:Truco
User:Truco/Reviews
Home Chat Contributions Sandbox (2) Subpages Reviews
Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

RE: Hall of Fame

I haven't forgotten about it. Because you said you would be busy for awhile and wouldn't be able to work on it, I've been working on other side projects for the time being. I still plan to have it finished in the next couple of weeks. Nikki311 15:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

I know they are allowed, it's just one of those minor things that bug me. Usually I only fix them when I have a normal edit to make (i.e. posting when posting a reply). TJ Spyke 00:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a pain

Culd you hold off until the end of March (this month) and then archive it? You will not need to ask me then. Simply south (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World

Where is "world status" being disputed? The dispute ended following Justapunk's withdrawal. This in addition to official sources supporting the "world status" of the listed subjects. --UnquestionableTruth-- 03:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page: Ricky Ortiz

Please answer why he is better known by his real name? Raaggio 00:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I read it. Someone moved the article to his real name WITHOUT consensus. No one discussed it afterward. Also, there were complaints about him not being that notable under Richard Young and also wanting to remove the quantifier. Raaggio 01:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Still, don't you agree it should be Ricky Ortiz instead of '"Atlas DaBone? He has vast more exposure as Ortiz... Raaggio 01:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He was on the practice squad, he never did anything notable for the NFL. Plus, XFL folded before anything fruitful could be achieved. The man's notability has already been achieved, but as a wrestler. The question would be, should he go by his OVW name (Atlas DaBone) or his ECW name (Ricky Ortiz). Raaggio 01:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USMA Astronauts

Worked your issues on this list. RlevseTalk 02:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD review

See commons:Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#PD_review. RlevseTalk 02:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fountain of Time

Could you please review the dabs again.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter

I checked the time I made the edit of the DYK. It says the 24th. 16:53 to be truthful. Here is the link: [1]--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They didn't inform me of the DYK until about three hours after it appeared.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever, I just remember sitting there watching and waiting for it to appear since it was my first DYK. But whatever.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't hurt my feelings, I'm just bored and paranoid at the sametime. Plus I'm trying to figure out how to win this debate which is weird because I can make a mark on Youtube cry. On here I can't be a jackass, smartass, asshole, or any type of ass lol.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you have an Yahoo IM account. May I speak to you for a moment? My user name is wmhc818@yahoo.com.--WillC 01:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 12:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

FLC revisit needed

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Blackhawks players. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New FL criteria discussion: Final phase

Hello, I think we've hammered out a good revised Featured List criteria here. If this passes, there will be quite a few FLs that could soon be delisted just because of 3b. With that in mind, I'd like to get comments and opinions from all FLC regulars and everyone else who has participated in the discussion before it's implemented. Thanks, Scorpion0422 17:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List ready for your eyes.

Per your suggestion, I am notifying you that I have completed the previous suggestions, and I will wait your review patiently. The list in question is: Boston Reds (1890–1891) all-time roster. Thank you.Neonblak talk - 23:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changes made, ready for re-viewing.Neonblak talk - 04:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GRB 970508 FAC

Greetings! You left some comments on GRB 970508's FAC with which I believe I have sufficiently complied. I'm not sure if you had intended to give the article a full Support / Oppose !vote, but if that is the case, would you mind having another look at the article and letting me know what you think? I just don't want there to be any confusion for Raul / Sandy / Karanacs when they review the FAC. Thanks mate! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WPVG Newsletter (March 2009)

What would you do with this lead? You can respond here.RlevseTalk 20:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well from you're previous lists I would expand it the same way to give a summary of the list.--Best, RUCӨ 20:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's where the problem is, there's no common career theme here, just that they didn't graduate. All I can think of is list a sampling of those listed. RlevseTalk 21:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Sampling seems like a good idea, and maybe try to find a common ground which the alumni have done after not graduating.--Best, RUCӨ 21:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For all your reviews

The Reviewers Award The Reviewers Award
You review anything and everything at WP:FLC, and that makes you more than deserving. Cheers! KV5 (TalkPhils) 21:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! I like to give awards, and I only wish I could review as many lists as you do; I'm just not sure about stepping out of my comfort zone. I do a lot with sports and sports reviewing, but I don't know so much about what is and isn't accepted in other topics. KV5 (TalkPhils) 21:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus College scientists

Thanks for your thorough review of, and your support for, this list. I've made some of the improvements you suggested to the other related lists; it's always interesting to see what other eyes spot that I've missed. Regards, and happy editing, BencherliteTalk 21:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the errors you found on the article. Can you take another look?  Rockk3r Spit it Out! 04:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the singles without reference. Check it out now.  Rockk3r Spit it Out! 19:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested

Please comment on my latest suggestion here, which might render another list unnecessary. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a reply.

Regarding this. Yes, I do call you immature. No immature person would bring personal issues to an edit summary like that. If you have a problem, bring it to my talk page.

You constantly criticize me and tell me that I'm bitter because you opposed my RfA. I've said it times and times before, your opinion is worthless and means nothing to me. As far as I'm concerned, it's not even there. But your constant edit warring to get your way, and your childish behavior is what drives editors away from the professional wresting project.

Telling others' their opinion doesn't matter to try and get your way is just an example of the immaturity I'm talking about. Your hypocritical statements about myself being bitter and immature, when you prove, every time we meet, that you are quite the same.  iMatthew :  Chat  00:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JBL

Please explain to me you edits. His ringame is NOT John "Bradshaw" Layfield (JBL). His ring name is just John "Bradshaw" Layfield. JBL is just shorthand or a nickname. It's the same way Montel Vontavious Porter is sometimes called MVP. JBL is not part of his ring name and thus should not be in the ring name section. TJ Spyke 00:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Orn

I feel this should remain to stand, as it was officially announced by Vickie Guerrero that Randy Orn would be competing in the WWE title match at Backlash.