User talk:E-Kartoffel

Archive 1

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bodast.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Bodast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Come on Feel the Illinoise/Hallelujah (Leonard Cohen song) changes

Just to ask, did you have any consensus on that before the changes? Not that they're bad changes but previously i had "Come on Feel the Illinoise" reverted to "Illinoise" on the Sufjan article.

Normally, as in the case of "Hallelujah", the most famous song of that name would occupy the "Example (song)" spot but there's so many I agree with the disambiguation. Thanks Sillyfolkboy (talk) 03:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Beat music / Merseybeat

I left a message on the Beat music page suggesting that most of it should be in a separate article called "Merseybeat". Now, I've realised that there once was a separate article, but you merged them some time ago - I can't track down any discussion at the time if there was any. I'm curious to know why you did that? It seems to me that there is scope for a good article specifically on Merseybeat - much of which is already in the article, but also focusing on its relationship to the specific cultural background of Liverpool, and also on how it was largely taken over and diluted by the London music business. There would then also be a need for a separate article on Beat music, which is a much wider term and could could put Merseybeat in its context, together with references to the music scenes of Birmingham, Newcastle, London, Belfast, etc etc. and the European (Hamburg etc.) links. The term "Merseybeat" (the style of music, not the magazine) is generally known, so why not a separate article? Do you have strong views on this? Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Reg-king-album.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Reg-king-album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 01:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Samuelprody.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Samuelprody.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 01:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:People from Greater Wellington

Category:People from Greater Wellington, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 04:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Decca artists

I have nominated Category:Decca artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Decca Records artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Pearls Before Swine

Good to see someone else taking an interest - thanks! Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Second Chapter

I've reverted your arbitrary move of this page - since there is no other use on Wikipedia of the term "Second Chapter", no disambiguation was necessary. The similarities between "Second Chapter" and "Chapter Two" are too tenuous to require a link to a disambiguation page. Only the meaning is the same, the terms themselves are clearly different enough already. Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Artists achieving number-one hits in the United States and United Kingdom simultaneously

This note is to inform you that The Monkees do not qualify for inclusion in this article as they did not achieve #1 status simultaneous in the US and UK in the charts listed in the article in question so your passage about The Monkees will be deleted. Steelbeard1 (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Apologies as I found evidence that the song "I'm A Believer" does qualify. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

That's better. The links back up the information and is much better than your original unsourced posting. Steelbeard1 (talk) 15:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Useless redirect of Music single pages to other artists

I feel that your intervention on the single Substitute by the Clout disturb the way that it should be.
This page is about the single BY the Clout, so the note that Substitute was released by The righteous Borther is informative but the page must be labeled as the Substitute by the Clout, and another page for the Righteous Brothers release should be created... It so obvious for me, and I don't understand why you maintain the image of the Clout single on a page labeled for another artist...
So be for a long time a wiki contributor. Kumeon (talk) 17:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Songs by Bob Crewe

I have nominated Category:Songs by Bob Crewe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Songs written by Bob Crewe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 05:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Songs by Bob Gaudio

I have nominated Category:Songs by Bob Gaudio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Songs written by Bob Gaudio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 05:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo-cherry-red.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-cherry-red.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Clique (1960s UK band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Clique (1960s UK band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sassf (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Songs by Jerry Leiber

I have nominated Category:Songs by Jerry Leiber (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into [[:Category:]] ([[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] edit] | [[Category talk:|talk]] | [[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] history] | links | [[[:Template:Fullurl::Category:]] watch] | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Parents' Choice Award

A tag has been placed on Parents' Choice Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Love Story (Jethro Tull song)

I have nominated Love Story (Jethro Tull song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Story (Jethro Tull song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of La-La-La-Lies

I have nominated La-La-La-Lies, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La-La-La-Lies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Juvenile Deletionist 19:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim McCarthy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jim McCarthy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No claim of notability, no reliable sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 19:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of This Woman's Work (disambiguation)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article This Woman's Work (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Only two items, cross-disambiguated

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sceptre ^(talk) 16:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Masters Apprentices

Despite the first album's cover, the band was The Masters Apprentices. Other album/single covers show some with and some without the apostrophe. The article states that they deliberately omitted the apostrophe, and that they were named by founder Mick Bower as being apprentices to the masters of the blues with a selection of masters named (see Adelaide years section). Hence grammatically that should be The Masters' Apprentices not The Master's Apprentices. Both Ed Nimmervoll at Howlspace (see here) and Duncan Kimball at Milesago (see ref #2) use no apostrophe. Ian McFarlane in his Encyclopedia of Australian Rock & Pop (see ref #1) however does use the apostrophe. Nevertheless Jim Keays, another founding member, does not use the apostrophe either for his 1999 book title nor for his official website. APRA lists song performers as Masters Apprentices (e.g. "Undecided"). Finally when ARIA inducted the band into its Hall of Fame in 1998 they inducted The Masters Apprentices not The Master's Apprentices. The preponderance of other references in the article use no apostrophe, hence with no consensus for your changes could you please revert them to The Masters Apprentices. Further discussion should be held at Talk:The Masters Apprentices where I have placed a similar note.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 06:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello E-Kartoffel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 694 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Reg King - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Miki Dallon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Roy Dyke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Pierre Tubbs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. John Bromley (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Sharma

Hi. "Pandit" is an unofficial title and not part of his actual name - it's fixed back now. Thanks. Hekerui (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

No, Sharma is his name, Pandit is the title. Hekerui (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

The Shadows discography

Hi my friend, I think you do great edits with The Shadows, and would like to collaborate with you on both Cliff Richard and the Shadows as I think we both together can turn these articles into FA status. If I add anyrthing new, out of respect, I will let you know. Please do the same for me, if you will. Thanks! Let us (you and me) turn these articles into "featured status" artcles! Thanks, my friend! Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Musical groups from Birmingham, England

I have nominated Category:Musical groups from Birmingham, England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Musical groups from Birmingham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

RE:Move of J.Williams to J.Williams (singer)

I want to thank you for cleaning up the above move so well; you relinked all the relevant pages with Williams link on them.
Thanks again, Adabow (talk) 03:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jackie wilson higher single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jackie wilson higher single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Discogs template

Just to let you know, I've responded to your query at Template talk:Discogs release. --JD554 (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Jimmy Nicol

You have made changes to Jimmy Nicol without first airing your concerns or suggestions on the discussion page, and that feels a bit like a slap in the face. Choosing “Jimmy” over “Jimmie” was a conscious decision (and not a mistake) and perhaps you ought to have enquired as to why this was so - whilst at the same time putting forward your case for change. I could then have explained that while Nicol obviously spelt his name “Jimmie” (I was aware of the photos), record companies and journalists seemed to prefer “Jimmy”; and that spelling became the more popular of the two. That was the reasoning behind it, and I might want to change it back. But if I do, I will first seek consensus, unlike you. --Patthedog (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

If a drummer has two different drumsets made with the same specific spelling of his name, it is a more than obvious message to me, and I respect this. What do badly informed journalists count? they don't - or what are you referring to in that direction? I know this was a rather massive move, and I'm sorry if it was surprising, but now you know I have my reasons (E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC))

Ok, let me explain. The reason it was “Jimmy” over “Jimmie” is because the former became the common spelling of his name, the other variations of it being acknowledged in the articles’ lead section. It was a toss-up as to which one was chosen, but as most books and articles referred to him as “Jimmy”, and we were quoting extensively from these, then it made sense to go with that. Listen, it’s not a major issue with me, but what did bother me (and still does) is your arrogance. Why didn’t you consult before going ahead? --Patthedog (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Template:Eurovision winning songwriters

Now that the template has been renamed, half of the names are missing: the lyricists. Who will take care of that? --FordPrefect42 (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Holyground

A tag has been placed on Holyground requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 14:30, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Lennon/McCartney songs not originally released by The Beatles

Category:Lennon/McCartney songs not originally released by The Beatles, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Matrix (name)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Matrix (name), has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Basically, this is your own proposal, except you didn't state a rational, start discussion, marked the target page or invited contributors (I use Help:Merging to remind me all the required steps). Since I support the idea I followed through. --Muhandes (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The Bachelors

You have deleted the - Category:British Invasion artists from the Bachelors with the comment "this band is unrelated to the british invasion (no hits))"
I don't know what you count as "hits" but as far as I know, "Charmaine" reached #2 and "Diane" #10 in the US.
I say "as far as I know" because there is a lot of disinformation about the Bachelors, who had "a messy split"
There has been a long standing edit war between the supporters of the Cluskey Brothers and the supporters of John Stokes which I quietened down by removing both sides versions of the split from the WP article, listing both sides sites and letting the reader decide.
I don't want to start the factions off again, so propose reinstating the Category:British Invasion, unless you are sure I am wrong.
Arjayay (talk) 12:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

J.R. Cobb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect J.R. Cobb. Since you had some involvement with the J.R. Cobb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 11:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Masterplan

Now that Masterplan points to the disambig, could you help clean up per WP:FIXDABLINKS? Thanks, --JaGa^talk 11:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Use of minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Wheels, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Questioning removal of Tupelo Chain Sex from Category:psychobilly groups

This comment is posted at Talk:Tupelo Chain Sex - please respond there: I'm questioning the logic of removing the categorization of this band from Category:psychobilly groups and Category:American psychobilly groups under the rationale this band is not restricted enough to call them psychobilly. I wasn't aware that a musical group must be restricted to a single style in order to be considered part of a category. Given that the psychobilly classification of this group is derived from an article cited from The Miami News in a direct quote classifying the group as "psychobilly" (as well as other genres), I posit that "third party reputable source" trumps "personal opinion." Will wait for response before reverting. --Quartermaster (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

New responses to this issue have been posted on the Tupelo Chain Sex talk page --Quartermaster (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Bromley (musician)

The article John Bromley (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a non notable biography of a living person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 16:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Cryin'

Hi. I wanted to let you know that I moved the article back per WP:PRECISION, since it is the only article we have under the title and the term was left as a redirect. I did, though, put a hatnote on the article in case people are looking for "crying". --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. Looking at your other edits, it seems like maybe it really needs to be hatted to "crying (disambiguation)" and not to crying? Can you clarify what you're concerned will be confusing to people who wind up at that page? --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kohoutek-Kometenmelodie

The article Kohoutek-Kometenmelodie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Template:Sandy Denny. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 22:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Desdemona (disambiguation). ‎It took a fair amount of investigation to conclude your edits were to comply with MOS:DAB by removing unnavigable entries. Thanks, —EncMstr (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the big improvement in use of edit summaries. It is now much easier to figure out what you did in your edits. Keep up the good work! —EncMstr (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		Thanks for all your hard work on disambiguation pages, it's appreciated. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, E-Kartoffel. You have new messages at Talk:Nobody but Me (The Isley Bothers song).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Men

"The Quarrymen (also written as "The Quarry Men")". Changed.--andreasegde (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Pop Chronicles template

Thank you, E-K, for catching, and fixing, the big mistake we'd left in Template:Pop Chronicles. There is now a documentation page, so I'll move those links into the /doc section. DougHill (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

The Real Thing (group)

Hi. :) I disagree with your move there and have moved it back pending consensus for such a change. If you'd like to discuss, I've set out my reasoning at the article's talk page. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Mighty Quinn (song)

I have left a message for you on the talkpage above. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Supersuckers

Good call on the Supersuckers move - I would've done it myself if I hadn't had some recent traumatic move request experiences... cause there are in fact a few albums credited to "The" Supersuckers (The Smoke of Hell, The Sacrilicious Sounds of The Supersuckers, Steve Earle & The Supersuckers, Live at the Magic Bag, How The Supersuckers Became the Greatest Rock and Roll Band in the World) - but the vast majority are credited to "Supersuckers" - so, again, good call. Wikkitywack (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Maybe you could do the same thing over at The Carpenters? (Maybe "Carpenters (band)" if somebody objects that the plural of a word should always redirect to its parent... hey, it happened over at Mentors (band).) Anyhow, somebody moved it ages ago citing some non-existent Wikipedia naming policy. (Almost beside the point - because, as you'll see, there is virtually no evidence supporting "The" Carpenters - here is a later discussion where people agree the name must be changed back.) Wikkitywack (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for giving me a note, currently "Carpenters" is the one eponymous album, impossible: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Carpenters but the duo is definitely not a "band", a band is a singer, guitar, bass, drums line-up, difficult, maybe Carpenters (duo), (music duo), (vocal duo) any idea ? (E-Kartoffel (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC))

Help with an edit

Hi E-Kartoffel:

I notice that you made a recent edit for David Spero so thought I'd ask if you could take a look here on the Discussion page and consider making a quick addition to the article. I'm related to a member of one of the bands that Spero manages, so I have a conflict and don't want to edit the article directly.

Thanks! Ludasaphire (talk) 13:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)