User talk:Jim1138

Welcome!

Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

UALR Page Vandalism

The same IP from last time, 99.121.96.73, has repeated the edits but now substantiated their claim with sources that verify their claims. Verified or not, however, their contribution is heavy with malice and negative bias. Quoting them here from talk:

Okay, the statements have been sourced and all the links work. Anyone care to argue that Oak Forest is NOT crime-ridden and filled with crack houses? Anyone care to dispute that the university campus is located in that area? Anyone care to dispute that Patricia Guardado was abducted from across the street and murdered? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.121.96.73 (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Though it is factually correct there is only ONE line of crime statistic per page on Wikipedia of the TOP TEN most dangerous universities in the country. This kind of information is slanderous and VERY atypical of content typically on University pages on Wikipedia. I'm considering removing the contribution. Your thoughts? Junipel (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

This I.P., 99.121.96.73, has vandalized the UALR page at least 3 times within the past week. Are there any steps possible to keep this from reoccurring? Much thanks! Junipel (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

I would not consider that vandalism, but undue weight. I removed the safety block citing wp:undue Jim1138 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Much thanks, Jim. I realize now that it is not vandalism. Junipel (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Rob Parker (sports journalist), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. -- Luk ^talk 21:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha sorry I went a bit too fast while trying to warn the offenders. I was trying to warn the IP below you :D. Sorry again! -- Luk ^talk 21:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

"Stephen W. Burns Would you please put your information on talk:Stephen W. Burns? It really should not go in the article. That is definitely important to have Wikipedia accurate. I did note that his name is spelled with and "e" on IMDB. Thanks for your contributions! Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)" Both IMDB & Wikipedia are known for their many inaccuracies, but IMDB is more honest and humble about it. I gave you the sources illustrating the "Stephen" misspelling, which you are of course free to disregard, as is usual for wikipedia, which is why I usually disregard it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.248.246 (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Carolyn Jarvis

Vandalism on Carolyn Jarvis? What are you talking about? It's been part of this Wiki article for years that she used to be on "The Lofters", and it's a very well known fact, the show was viewed by tens of thousands of Canadians on the Life Network. All I did was reverse an edit by someone else, who for all we know could be Carolyn herself trying to hide her embarrassing past. I'll even add the reference if you insist to imdb and a youTube video where she is clearly seen. Carpet Crawler 2009 (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Huggle reversion

Hi, could you stop your reversions for a moment? I'd like to discuss a few. Prodego ^talk 08:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

So you reported two editors to AIV. One was 180.215.44.122 (talk · contribs). When you reported this editor, several of the edits you listed as vandalism, upon inspection turned out to be the IP correcting misinformation to the article ([1] [2]). Another was 109.153.143.149 (talk · contribs) where I cannot see how you determined their edits added false info. Could you please explain your actions in both of these cases? Thanks, Prodego ^talk 08:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I see, the first was huggle's fault (and someone else's mistake), while the second I do think you should be more careful about, but I can understand. Thanks. Prodego ^talk 21:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Other users' Vandalism

Hi Jim,

Regarding this revision: [3] and its user talk warning [4]

Please be careful when calling other users' edits vandalism. In this case, the user (User:TheKingsq) is brand new to Wikipedia and their edit, while probably not helpful, does not really constitute vandalism. New users tend to appreciate gentle guidance and constructive encouragement while vandalism warnings are likely to make them stop editing. This user has even asked for help. It appears TheKingsq doesn't understand what the image caption should display but provided an accurate edit summary and even made an (admittedly misguided) attempt at referencing his revision. --Carbon Rodney 17:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Home owners association

I have placed my views on the discussion page of the article. --IvarT (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

{{helpme}} eocsap — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKingsq (talk • contribs) 02:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

It appears you are trying to get the attention of Jim1138 but you used the helpme template. When you use this template it calls everyone who monitors the helpme category to wherever it is placed. It is thus only for use when you want some third party to come by. By contrast, whenever you edit a person's talk page, that particular user will get an unmistakable day-glo orange bar at the top of every page they see telling them that they have new messages on their talk page, which persists until they visit it, so its all you need.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: January 2012

Hello, user Jim1138. Thanks for the reminder but as you can see, I did put the word "unexplained removal of content", only that I'm quite lazy (if that's my old bad behaviour) to keep doing this all the time. So I found a new way to revert back the previous user's edit, so I didn't notice that.

However, if you wish to know why I revert that, please see this: Talk:Arab_Spring#Parties_to_the_civil_conflict_and_Lead_figures. Everything can be discuss there. I reject what you quote me about "Your content removal does not appear constructive". You may not follow us but basically what I'm trying to do is I'm reverting illegitimate infobox to civil conflict with illogical arrangement of leaders and the party figures. And that this goes against the policy of WP:RS.

But as I need to say again, thanks for the reminding. 60.49.63.145 (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

LIST of EV Manufacturer

I tried to add a new manufacturer to this specific list of manufacturer of EV charger, however this is considered spam. I cannot understand why as this new line has similar content as the others (a short decription with a link to the webpage). Could you tell me the reason? Thank in advance you for your answer. Giubbolini (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Bids for the Sing-Out Song Contest 2011

Hey Jim! :)

Scratch the Speedy, I've given them the benifet of the doubt - AfD. Regards, -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

ISO on machine vision should REALLY refer to film speed and not the International Standards Organization!

ISO in context of machine vision refers to film speed and not a standards body! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.181.240 (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83.134.181.240#All_right--83.134.181.240 (talk) 02:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Gleniffer High School

Hi Jim, nice vandal patrolling. I must ask, how was the edit here not adhering to NPOV? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Why on earth are you reverting my changes on my userpage?

The title is clear enough. Raijithetroll (talk) 02:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not revert without verifying

You have reverted my changes to The Oath of the Vayuputras page. The page was wrongly marked as a redirect to the first novel in the trilogy and I removed that to make an article for the page itself which refers to the third novel in the trilogy. Kindly be patient while someone is mending a page. Thanks Noopur28 (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Blocking Edits

Hi Jim,

Sorry about the previous edits! And quite frankly, labeling them as disruptive is offensive! I think the public needs to learn the truth instead of being brainwashed by what the media puts out as the truth. One more thing, one of the statements that was posted on the page Kashmir conflict was undoubtedly untrue--that was not a "disruptive" edit [I forgot what it actually was]. Oh, and one last thing: Can you send me a link of a free blog that I can use to give the real truth to the world? Thanks and I won't waste my time anymore trying to inform people of the real truth on Wikipedia! Sorry about not posting this in a message. I did not know how to do that.

173.224.98.115 (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)EternalTruth173.224.98.115 (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

No Problem

I had to change my name because the "troll" part that got me perma banned, and I logged in through my old user name, a stupid mistake. Thanks and sorry if I caused you inconvenience. Raijithetroll (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the page Michael Nutter

Hello.

I would like to kindly state that it appears that you have reverted my edit by mistake. Another anonymous editor had posted, according to the user Drmies (talk · contribs) "unverified and irrelevant BLP info", as well as other unverified information (see edit history). The (anonymous) editor had then reverted Drmies, apparently in bad faith. I had then reverted what I believed to be a bad faith revert.

Please let me know if you still believe I have done something which was not compliant to policy.

Thanks. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

(Reply to message at User talk:75.53.212.214): Thank you. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

In regards to my change in the Battle of Mogadishu (1993) page, the final UN withdrawl was in March (1995) and not March (1994) you might be mistaken for the US Army Withdrawl date and is verified in many accounts and records, try and search for Operation United Shield where U.S. Marines were re-deployed by president clinton back too somalia to cover the UNs final withdrawl from the war torn region. As the the United Nations by then declared it a failed state or lost cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.132.162.148 (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Lalor talk

I had incorporated the relevant stuff and then archived it off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herestoree (talk • contribs) 10:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

) your quick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herestoree (talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

"Scott Pilgrim vs World"

I'm writing to let you know that I removed your G7 on Scott Pilgrim vs World and reverted to a redirection. Since other editors pointed out that the page should be made a redirection, G7 (which requires there to be only one significant contributor) does not apply here. Zzarch (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Hobbyfarm

I've blocked quail man for 48 hours. The edits seem childish rather than really malicious, so I've not imposed a longer block at this stage. With luck he will realise that there are sanctions, and reform. If not, the next block can be indefinite. Let me know if your unhappy with my action, otherwise it's just for info Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

user:Indiawale

Do you have more detail on what was pasted from usa.today [5]? Materialscientist (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Its Ok, thanks. I was checking for copyvio before blocking him, couldn't find it (thus asked) and blocked anyway for edit warring. Materialscientist (talk) 05:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Bjornsonw

ThanksBjornsonw (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Katie Noonan Wikipedia Page

Hi Jim

Could you please advise why you changed my revisions to the Katie Noonan wikipedia page? I updated it will all correct and current information however you have reverted the page back to it's old state. Could you please advise ASAP.

Thank you Ellen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.154.177 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Archimede Morleo

If you want, i can sent you the link to download the illegal copy of the Bologna accounts. It just because i can't cite the real link. 210.6.84.49 (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

centre & harbour

Thank you for fixing my error. I honestly thought they were typos. my apologies. Thanks for clarifying promptly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narez (talk • contribs) 09:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting my talk page! I really appreciate it! I will be really happy if you give me a banister! Have a wonderful day,Wikih101 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Snow Leopard

Hello Jim1138, How was saying BBC's videos are amazing not neutral — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoJaEpp (talk • contribs) 02:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Oh please quit it. You know very well what's going on. Calabe1992 02:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The fact is that it is amazing. How is that not a fact? I don't know of any one who would say it's not. Any ways forget it, its just a small edit. Thanks. JoJaEpp (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I need something to cheer myself up for working late into the night

Can you please give me a Beer for You, Cookie for You, and a Coffee for You? Also, I think I did a really good and hard job of keeping Wikipedia almost vandal free, so can you please give me some anti vandalism banisters including the The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar and other anti vandal awards and also a Happy New Year! banister. Sorry for the big request, but I really need something to cheer me up for working so hard. Have a nice day, Wikih101 (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Can you please just give me at least one?

Can you please just give me a barnstar or two at least please? I am pretty sure that others won't be suspicious if you just give me one or two barnstar. Thanks. Wikih101 (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I mean barnstar, sorry! :) Wikih101 (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I wasnt uncivil

Thanks for pointing me towards the civility page, but it seems none of it applies to anything I said. Thanks 74.132.152.205 (talk) 08:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

That was quite the opposite. User:Eraserhead1 (and you too) removed content from that page with no reason. I acted to add the materials back. 42.3.2.237 (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Legal financing industry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Editing of English Language

You sent me a message (User talk:194.197.118.196) reminding me of the rules regarding use of the english language, i had edited a page so the spelling said "centre" instead of "center". The rules state that if the page refers to an American subject, it should be American, and if English, then in English. The page referred to a battle in which England took part, therefore I changed the spelling to British English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.197.118.196 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Huayu-Huayu

Same editor reverted me 3 times on my talk page too. I've left a note at ANI. I get the impression he is one of those Taiwan nationalist pushers. I gather you're not an admin able to block him? You should be if not and I'd support your candidacy.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You reverted him three times, so did I!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Ridiculous - Taiwan nationalist, because I say Taiwan Dao means Taiwan Island??? Are you joking??? Huayu-Huayu (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Taiwan

You ask me to take the issues to talk Taiwan, but they are there already. Maybe you have been misguided by Dr Blofeld. He just reverted, removed content etc, without giving reason. See talk:

• Talk:Taiwan#Removal of Taiwan Dao
• Talk:Taiwan#Article is about the island

Huayu-Huayu (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

HEY MISTER, I GAVE U A BARNSTAR

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		KEEP ON GOIN' Will'swiki000 (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

ONE BARNSTAR TOO MANY

		The Special Barnstar
		WOW, YOU HAVE GOT TOO MANY AWARDS Will'swiki000 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Do you like football :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey how are you today (talk • contribs) 05:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

United People's Democratic Solidarity

Thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I have rectified them. Please check out the page and see it meets Wikipedia's Standards. Kaitheloner (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks :) Kaitheloner (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome

Keep up the good work, cheers Kaitheloner (talk) 09:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Great work on reverting the vandals!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You did an awesome job on beating the vandals! See you on Huggle! Wikih101 (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Freon

sorry, i didn't notice your revert, and thought i didn't save the change Nikos 1993 (talk) 01:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Cody Ryan Ellis

Your A3 speedy deletion tag of Cody Ryan Ellis was not correct- A3 only applies to pages with truly no content, and the criterion actually lists what that means. The article in question had enough content to not be eligible for A3 speedy deletion. However, since no claim of importance was made, the article was deleted under A7.--Slon02 (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Shekhawat

Hi, thank you for your message. I would like to inform you that the information that I removed from Shekhawat was red links, personal information/address of individuals that are not notable as well as just plain personal opinion. If possible, can you undo your revert or clean-up the article yourself. I will greatly appreciate it. (69.112.78.110 (talk) 03:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC))

Thank you so much. I am grateful. (69.112.78.110 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC))

Thanks!

Thanks for helping out on my talk page. Rm1271 ^talk_contribs 19:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For the quick revert on my talk page (and everything else I've been seeing lately)... Calabe1992 05:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Nico Yennaris

Ah sorry .. I was just going by what was written in the article and wanted the cats to match. Didn't really bother checking the info. :D TonyStarks (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Gurjara-Pratihara

Hi, can you please help me, User:Yaudheya keeps reverting the edits of other contributors and mine without any explanation. Instead he constantly is adding his personal opinion, which has POOR sentence structure, grammar, and spelling issues. Please can you revert his edit. I will go far to say this is vandalism. Thank you (69.112.78.110 (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC))

You could just revert the edits yourself, no? Additionally, I have left this user a caution against adding improperly cited materials. Feel free to add a user warn template (as found on WP:WARN) if you see any additional vandalism going on. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 21:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for reverting User:Yaudheya vandalism User:Zzarch. As you can see from the 'edit history' of the article, I have been reverting his edits, but he reverts it day after day. I will guarantee he will come back in couple of days and revert your edit. As you will observe from this, this, this, this, this, this, and more. He has been edit warring with me and users: WikHead, Gurjeshwar, Themeparkgc, JSquish for the last month but he avoids edit warring by coming back in couple of days and reverting to his version. thank you (69.112.78.110 (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC))

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For all you've done for Wikipedia (69.112.78.110 (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC))

Pixdev

Just realised I've wiped your changes when I added the templates at the same time as you - sorry! Jazzmista (talk) 08:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Tooting & Mitcham

Clearly you have not read the entire article as you would otherwise have noticed the ridiculously trivial nature of the whole topic. Furthermore, one piece of prior editing - which apparently made some genuinely knowledgeable observers laugh out loud - is so cleverly phrased that it has remained beyond the grasp of the self-appointed but improperly informed monitors of Wikipedia.

It is evident from your talk page that you have previously interfered unhelpfully in matters beyond your expertise; that is surely just the type of thing you are seeking so misguidedly to avoid !! I will once again restore the article and do not expect to hear anything further on the subject.

All the best, 90.199.27.242 (talk) 08:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh dear, hopefully you and the so-called JamesBWatson enjoyed your little sniggering session in the playground this morning. It's probably a good idea to avoid sarcasm though as this will most likely end in disappointment for you and your ilk. 90.199.27.242 (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Janice Mills in List of Australian artists

Hi. I'm not sure why you added this entry. It doesn't meet the notability guidelines because the entry itself isn't referenced; there's no WP article about the artist; and the account adding it in the first place appears to have a COI (since it carries the name of the artist in question. This really shouldn't be there. I'm going to remove it. If you think that's the wrong course of action, happy to discuss on the article talk page. But talk there before attempting to reinstate pls. Ta. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 06:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tgeairn (talk) 06:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Anglian Bus

Jim - I believe you have undone my deletions of our page. I am not against this, but someone with a grudge (or just bored) keeps posting that our company is in administration. first posted 19 January & again last night 24 January. Last night they also deleted a whole range of our service information.

I have no problem if site is returned to pre 19 january version, but we can not allow someone to post lies about us. Is there anyway you can block revisions like this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.46.23.39 (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I just examined the page and there is no mention of the company being in administration. Manning (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

No, because I deleted it earlier today by undoing the change. The "administration" section was added on 19 jan - I amended yesterday to say this was not true & overnight the person who posted it changed it back again. I removed again this morning, but as they had also deleted the route information we decided it safer to remove all content. This is probably not the correct course to take, but limited time available to find out how to correct this & has at least put us in touch directly.

The route information used to start with service 001, but now only 601 onwards remains on site. Before 19 january we had no problem with the information on opage. can you rewind back to then?

Let's take the discussion here - Talk:Anglian Bus. Manning (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

RE: January 2012

The Reception is an [u]entire[/u] quote. Clearly you did not let that pass your review of the article, did you? Maybe you should familiarize your own self with the Wikipedia Rules, than maybe you would allow a positive change to the article that would allow the removal of the Over-quotation block on the top of the page. 68.160.206.157 (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Codyluva/Sandbox

Hi. I created the user as an alternate account for a demonstration of various ways to revert vandalism (I'd revert actual vandalism, but I rarely manage to happen upon it) and all the edits under that page (with the exception of yours) were done by me. I do know that the edit made under that IP was unconstructive. However, I guess that now I can show how an edit conflict works, since the edit window I opened to capture a revert is still open. :) - Purplewowies (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

(replying to comment on my talk page)Eh, it's OK. I've added a note to the sandbox page saying that that IP (which I thought was dynamic, but I guess not) is supposed to be vandalizing the page so that someone who sees the vandalism might be less likely to revert it (any vandalism will be swiftly reverted by me or Codyluva, anyway). - Purplewowies (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Please see Wikipedia:CSD#G7, it is acceptable for the only major contributor of an article to blank the page, is not considered vandalism. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, it was Robert William Guthrie GimliDotNet (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

We all do it

Don't worry about it, we've all done [it before] GimliDotNet (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For keeping an eye on my userspace :) I am impressed at how quick you are, you reverted it before I could--and I had the orange bar cluing me in! Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Overt Vandalism?

I wasted 2 hours of my life adding relevant and non-controversial content to an extremely outdated page... think 2005.

Immediately, some guy reverts the whole page deleting all my work... with absolutely no rationale at all.

Not beneficial to the page?

How is that even remotely possible?

Then, I am trying to figure out what happened and somehow you are accusing me of Overt Vandalism.

What gives?

This is the craziest thing I ever heard of... not really.

However, I feel like you guys sucker-punched me and left me for dead in the alley... with no rationale... only a random act of evil... that's how it felt to me.

I am happy to leave you guys to patrol over dead Wiki pages with 7 year old content.

Only the idealist in me always thinks that things like Wikipedia are not so sadly chaotic.

I probably even will get accused of something by writing this note to you.

Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mini4WD (talk • contribs) 05:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Solar Renewable Energy Certificates

Hi, thanks for undoing the User page edit. While you're at it, would you care to weigh in on the Solar Renewable Energy Certificates issue we're disputing? Thanks. Rostz (talk) 05:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Don't let the persistent vandalism and personal attacks on your talk page get to you, Jim. Wikipedia cannot be what it is without editors like you, so keep up the awesome work! ZZArch talk to me 09:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gay anthem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuck You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

William Crookes edits

Hi, Jim. I'm re-reverting the revert you made to Mr. Crookes article, after reading the message you sent to my current address. As this could be construed as rude, here's the explanation: I removed two links that pointed to a funeral firm page called "Survival After Death" where I was unable to find any work my Mr. Crookes, related (excuse me if I'm stepping on someone's feet) to a wacko guy that claims that Mr. Crookes gives scientific proof of life after death. I also removed a third link that claimed to point to a work related with Mr. Crookes (The Lost Letters of William Crookes) but that pointed to a description of the Cuban oceanic wire and only mentioned the title of the book. That edit seemed irrelevant to me, that's why I did not log in nor wrote an edit summary. I just removed two links that look like spam to me (the funeral services firm) and one irrelevant link (book only mentioned by title). However, after realizing you work with a bot that alerts you about "bulk" erasures made by anonymous users, I will from now on log in when erasing anything and write always a summary. If, after checking, you realize I'm mistaken and re-re-revert those references, I will not touch the article in any way, I trust in your judgment: there are no trouts in this creek. Keep the patrol moving and have a nice day! BTW, if you can edit this note so it doesn't appear side by side with your Patrol Badge, thanks, I was unable to do so. P.S. after removing again those three links I realized I erased by mistake a true link to "Diamonds" by Mr. Crookes, I just restored it. --Ciroa (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your note, yes that was my address. I did not realize that the "talk" tab was the place to post notes to you, that's why I posted the previous note in your user page, sorry. As you can imagine, I do not send messages to users frequently. I will use the edit summary from now on, and probably every time I do so, I will be thinking about you trying to sort the many vandalisms you correct. Also, many thanks in the name of all Wikipedia contributors, from Colombia (that's where I live). I read below that not everybody appreciates your work (I wonder what happened in the article about Berkeley that needs First Amendment Rights and a lawyer! In Spain when a gypsy is angry with you, he says: "I'll see you among lawyers"). I guess God forgives you five years in Purgatory for every year you work in the Vandal Patrol.... :) (just joking). Again, keep the good work.--Ciroa (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

My First Amendment Rights

My First Amendment rights extend to Wikipedia, as it is an American enterprise. If you people do not respect that, you will soon find yourself on the wrong end of a lawsuit. Thank you. Berkeley Deserves Better (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop embarrassing yourself and my city. Respectfully, a Berkeley resident. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 01:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Zzarch's talk page.
Message added 02:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ZZArch ^{talk to me} 02:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

God bless you

I was beginning to lose the plot there. Considering the hell on earth option. Thank you for being online. fredgandt 06:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

ah

don't know how that got there, thanks! Paintedxbird (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Kristen Bell

I can't understand your reasoning behind deleting factual information on her family. I tell you I'm one of the Step Siblings, I uploaded pictures of us, what else do you need? This information used to be posted on here and last year someone delelted it. By the way, her 2 dogs names are Lola and "Mr.Shakes" not "Shakey". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avedianmp (talk • contribs) 09:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

You failed to support this piece of information by a reliable source, and I am not sure if a listing of Ms. Bell's step siblings contributes much to the article as a whole. Please read the notices other editors left you carefully. Thank you. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 09:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

What is a reliable source? Google her name with mine, Matt Avedian, and tell me how pages have our side of the family listed. If you're going to be short, and pick and choose which siblings to include, you should just delete all of the siblings. What do you need from me to prove I am who I say I am? What is a credible source for her family info other than a relative? Shall I scan my Driver's License for Wikipedia? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avedianmp (talk • contribs) 09:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Take note at WP:RS. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Early 2012 Hong Kong protests

I think the redirection creator simply thought that the page was a duplicate to the one that s/he redirected to, while in fact I moved that page to the current one and did some heavy modification. Don't be too hard on him about it. Cheers! ZZArch ^{talk to me} 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

{{subst:uw-redirect1}} does seem a bit harsh for a level 1 I'll remove the warning from his talk page. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Erroneous Intamin revert

I've undone your revert: Reverted edits by 92.40.56.170 (talk) unexplained removal of content (HG). Each of the 8 edits are valid and all have clear edit summaries. Please review and remove the warning from my talk page. Thanks. 92.40.56.170 (talk) 15:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. 92.40.56.170 (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 01:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 513,228,387) 01:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

hello Jim I made somme changes on page "Senegal", forgot to mention my source this is my sources : http://allafrica.com/stories/201202031398.html How do I do to have removed your " Unsourced contributions notification" tks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamadou.mb (talk • contribs) 23:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Beating me with Huggle every time! BigDwiki (talk) 04:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at BigDwiki's talk page.
Message added 06:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BigDwiki (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Huh

I already know those kinds of things. I have no relation to you and suddenly you send a message to me. Why you sent that message to me and not the other guy? I only keep Wikipedia's rules in place, is that so wrong? The rule is to keep existing format created by the author, NOBODY can change it due to their personal thing. What wrong with that? ༆ (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Banned user?

Hello, have you ever previous been banned from editing wikipedia? You writing style is similar to a banned user[6]. Please explain. Sydactive (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Frankly, I see no such connection whatsoever, and unless you can provide credible evidence to your allegations, I will have to assume that this accusation is purely defamation in response to his reverting your edits. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 04:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Just to set things right, it appears that the accuser is in fact a confirmed sockpuppeteer. At this point I would imagine it's okay to remove this defamatory accusation. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 05:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

For staying up late and cleaning vandalism from my page!! Thanks!! BigDwiki (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppeteer

Actually, it was User:Jpgordon who did the investigations; I merely noticed his work afterwards. So you should definitely cast the thanks his way! ZZArch ^{talk to me} 10:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Page move

I've requested assistance at ANI to get that California page properly moved. That guy just doesn't seem to understand what speedy is for. Calabe1992 01:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Read one's talk page; really can help! Jim1138 (talk)

Money trail

Hi, need some help with Money trail. Some IPs, most recently 68.30.206.210, are determined to kill that chart. -72.37.249.60 (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

It would seem that both sides have merit. You might want to talk to someone else. Sorry Jim1138 (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Links

Can you please fix the links, since Wikipedia states that no such pages exist, whenever I click on them. Basically, they are "dead links." If you can't fix them, pleasae allow me to delete them, since I hate seeing links that don't work. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

If you don't believe me, try clicking on the links yourself. Like I said earlier, they are basically dead links. So, if you can't find a way to fix them (if that is even possible), please allow me to delete them, as the 2 links are making the bottom of the page look really messy, right now. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

By the looks of things, there is a technical fault, as the links to other language wikis were working a few hours ago Bruvtakesover (T|C) 00:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I don't know how, but the links hae just been fixed. The reason why I wanted them deleted, was because they weren't working, and because they made the bottom of the page look messy. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Not for a lot of other pages. For example, if I saw it correctly, the Aus page links were working just fine. However, the South Pac's links were not. 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I never saw a problem with the wp:interlanguage links. Glad you got the issue resolved. Thanks for adding the citation to your last edit. Jim1138 (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

That's strange. My computer was unable to use those links, even though the links on the other pages were fine. As for the citations, it is something that I am working on. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

If you go to the page 2011–12 South Pacific cyclone season, in the left column under "Languages" (you may need to click the arrow to show), you will see "Languages Deutsch Nederlands" Click on the link and you will be directed to that language version. The ones on the English page take you to the foreign language page. Jim1138 (talk) 03:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh. Thanks! 174.65.96.212 (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

weasel words on the Prague Declaration.

Thankyou for your attention on the Prague Declaration page. I agree I worded my edit badly and in haste, and you were right to delete it. I would appreciate it if you would also monitor Tataral, because I keep having to modify his weasel paragraphs.Spitfire3000 (talk) 07:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm afraid the only weasel words were introduced by you. Tataral (talk) 08:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Engagement marketing

Hello Jim, Thank you for your help on this subject. This was my first attempt at this. I hope the revisions that I made were correct.

Jody — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluewave Productions (talk • contribs) 08:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Tour des feroes change info

hello sorry for move info two times from Tour des Feroes to Tour des Faroes and finish with [Tour of Faroes Islands] because the name was wrong, the version its in english and the name was in french and the first time wrong tiped, i dont know how change the name of the article please if u can send to me a link with help how can change the name thanks Wolfgang 7lsp (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me to a bunch of reverts. Cheers! Rm1271 talkcontribs 01:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mudvayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

A happy ending

Great work in connecting those accounts. The result . Sunray (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Exeter vandal

Thanks for batting the IP vandalizing Exeter City F.C away from my user page. I am not holding my breath waiting for a lucid explanation from him on my talk page !  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   23:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Gabriel Lawrence Sengol

I thought "enormously unhelpful" was no exaggeration. BTW, I looked around for sources but Google News and Books had nothing to offer; I found nothing besides that catholic hierarchy site, which I have used in the past and consider reliable. Maybe you'll have better luck. Thanks for cleaning up, Drmies (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

After scanning it, my brain froze up and did not know where to begin. I read the history and quoted you. Hope that was OK! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Wonder what I did to cause that? GoingBatty (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

IP 24.38.181.81

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brian Boru is awesome. You have seen this same person under another IP before. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

"Skyward sword" article

Please delete the "Skyward sword" article. If not, have someone else delete it instead. Thank you for informing me. 98.169.110.135 (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Johnny Squeaky edits

At least one of Johnny Squeaky's edits was clearly out of line with its opinionated and inappropriate heading change, thus the NPOV warning. However no prejudice against discussion of what may be trivial or not at Talk:Greta Garbo. Dl2000 (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Raphaël Onana

Your addition to Raphaël Onana was removed as it was unsourced. Please see wp:rs and wp:citing sources for more information. Please add your content back with a good source. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes ! There is no problems for the reliable source , look the book on the work of Raphaël Onana.

• 'Un homme blindé à Bir-Hakeim' : Story in french of a officer Cameroonians Who does the War of 39-45, France, Paris, Editions L'Harmattan, 1996, p 272 . (ISBN 2-7384-4239-0)

I have got this book and I copy in Wikipedia. The book is in french and it is not easy to translate in a perfect english. Can you help me ?

Thank you, you know, I'm french... I know the Onana family which I belong. I know Raphaël Onana because he's my grandfather.

You think it is forbidden to translate a french page in english ? People who speak English are entitled to know the status of Raphael Onana ... Also, I have cousins ​​who live in London .... I urge you to read this book before acting recklessly ... Please do not destroy this page that is the truth.

I find : I cannot source my own knowledge, and my information is more accurate than most of the information on here, that is the truth. Some of this information is not accurate, and i would like to add something that is. You have removed something I have wrote because you deemed it unsourced, but this is of my own knowledge. I can assure you this was not reckless and you are confused.

External links

• [7] The book of Raphaël Onana in french.

Warinhari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 08:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

yes, it is miss something in english : [8] [User:warinhari] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

hurricane gloria

the information i removed from hurricane gloria was not accurate. hurricane gloria struck Long Island as a minimal category 1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds measured at 85 mph. hurricane gloria did NOT make landfall on long island with maximum sustained winds of 95-100 mph as said. gloria was not a category 2 hurricane at landfall, which winds of 95-100 mph fall under. my information is accurate. and yes i will convert the information from mph to mph and kmh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

hurricane gloria

ok sorry i was confused. yes i converted the information to mph and kmh. i have one other problem though. i am a weather fanatic and consider myself and expert in the field of severe weather. my editing to the 2011 new england tornado oubtreak was from my prior knowledge. i cannot give a source or cite my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Given wp:or, how would you resolve this? I am not accusing you, but many people place rumor, gossip, and outright lies on Wikipedia, so you can see the need for policy like this. Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC

Yes I do understand and I do not wish to cause any trouble or spread any bias or inaccurate information. I am a fanatic when it comes to severe weather, and I do not know everything there is out there but I consider myself an expert. I am in the process of becoming a meteorologist. I live in the town of Springfield, Massachusetts and lived through the tornado. I have studied the scientific Fujita-Scale for years now, and know it by heart. I personally toured the damage in the town of Monson proceeding the tornado. The damage was indefinitely of EF-4 intensity, although officially confirmed an EF-3. The power of the tornado was underestimated by many, and it would be extremely helpful if people got the chance to realize its true intensity. This is simply of my knowledge. I did not find this information from any website, so I cannot possibly cite it or give it a source. It has come from my own knowledge. You have removed it because I have not gave it a source, but I cannot source it, it has come from my own knowledge not something found from a fathering website. I would greatly appreciate it if you did not remove it. Thank You.

Trouted

and 85 mph will convert to 137 kmh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Raphaël Onana

I'm agree to find more citations of my article. If I found, I take notes when I can. I'm alone in my article, it's not easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Ooh ! The text American Civil War is heavy to read ...! But I can understand what do you said. But my grandfather is not a legendary heroe... He's ordinary a man like you. From the American Civil War, it is very difficult to prove because there's not really photography pictures, no Movie-camera before the period 1861–1865... But in the world war II, it is more easy to prove by the reliabilityof the journalism after 1939, the start of the World War II. Warinhari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Good work. You are a great protector of this project—and one who beats me to so many recent changes issues. NTox (talk) 07:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

user:Panoniann

He is also violated the 3 rever rule in transformer. Please block him too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bornder (talk • contribs) 08:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Social Security Act". Thank you.ChristianContributor (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Tricia Santos Fan Hoax Strike back Again

Hello!!

Another returning vandal of Tricia Santos with IP No 202.137.123.32 and 119.93.51.190. He or she create stories about Tricia but it is already a hoax stories. Can you extended to block this person again to prevent further vandalism stories. She is also candidate for sockpuppet. Tricia Santos is a former Teen PBB Housemate. How neither abs-cbn website nor pep.ph are not post about Tricia news of alleged inclusion of Teleserye or show of abs-cbn due to her attitude problem since during PBB Teen edition days. (talk) 04:27, 06 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.182.83 (talk)

Thanks!

Thanks for clearing my name, Jim! :) -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

uhhh

F*** that. People need a laugh or two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Okeyyyyyy :C98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Temple Run. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Have you heard of undoing it instead of being lazy and reverting it on Huggle? Not acceptable. J (t) 03:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you refrain from making incorrect reversions against Wikipedia policy. In regards to this edit, be aware that I indeed used an edit summary, and removed the content in a manner justifiable under Wikipedia policy. You, on the other hand, have added unsourced material to a BLP, some of which can easily be construed as controversial. I'd like an apology and a promise that this never happen again from you. Wikipedia does not need ignorant, trigger-happy patrollers. It needs sensible, careful ones. Please be the latter type. Very truly yours, 99.92.154.75 (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You are not welcome!

This is a sad place where nobodies live to enforce meaningless rules.--172.190.4.163 (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Humanities desk

I undid your reversion of this edit. It was a response to JackOfOz that does not violate any of Wikipedia's rules or principles; therefore, there is no justifiable reason for your revert. --140.180.7.220 (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Stop it. Look at the above messages. J (t) 13:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Removing messages

Jim, sorry for vandalizing some pages at Wikipedia but about the message you gave me, can I delete it? PatrickA.Tagle35 (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

It is your talk page, you can remove it. Thanks for the apology. Please do try to contribute in a constructive way. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The "Skyward sword" article

No additional Skyward Sword redirect page. Please delete and remove "Skyward sword". 98.169.110.135 (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Huggle problems

If you keep on reverting AGF without immediately apologizing I will report you. --J (t) 22:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that harsh tone but seriously. At least get off of Huggle and get yourself to admit your mistake. --J (t) 23:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

What is AGF and some specifics please. Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:AGF - if you don't know this your rollbacker rights should've been nulled. Specifics: IPs are ranting all about you; you don't immediately apologize, etc. --J (t) 01:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The Roanoke Times

Hi Jim. I'm not sure about this revert of yours... the IP had removed an unsourced paragraph accusing the paper of "anti-white and anti-Southern news and opinion columns"... seems like that ought to be sourced or removed. 28bytes (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I reverted probably as the IP removed some sourced content and did not leave an edit summary. I agree with you on the politics section and removed it entirely. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate it. 28bytes (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism on Article about Methodism in the Philippines

Hi Jim. I'm quite concerned about a lot of revisions happening in Methodism particularly that part of History of methodism in the Philippines. Edits contained vandalism and inappropriate language and citing some insults, in the other group. If my opinion counts, that would be a kind of discrimination. Isn't it? Are allowing it in Wikipedia? Thanks, Jim. Christian Eilers (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Editors who vandalize will get warned and if they continue, banned for various times. Sometimes pages seem to get targeted by a group, maybe through a chat room. There is a loose network "vandal patrol" who keep watch on thing, though problems do get by. The corrections you saw to Methodism were mostly vandal patrol. If you are especially concerned about Methodism, please add it to your watch list and keep track of it. BTW: are you referring to "Methodism" or some other article "Methodism in the Philippines"? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I am referring to a section in Methodism. Thanks Jim. That is a lot helpful. Christian Eilers (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Blanked by creator

Re this: I have db-g7 tagged the page. It was blanked by its creator. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Huggle usually, but not always warns you about reverting a page blanked by its creator. I removed my warning and apologized for my error. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps Huggle noticed that the creator/blanker wasn't the only editor: someone else seems to have contributed as well, and the page was tagged for deletion —and refused— before. So, perhaps this isn't clear-cut after all. Let's see what happens :-) Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I have seen Huggle warn "properly" with other editors in the history. Also have had Huggle report a vandal to AIV without recording any warnings on the vandal's talk page. Makes for some uncomfortable discussions with admins! Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello! question?

Can I ask you a question on one side of wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Ask away, I am here to help. I am about to sign off for ten hours. Jim1138 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12 Please, remove this page. I do not know who created it. But they are fooling. This program was never aired on TV and never will. Someone is playing with Wikipedia. And it probably is not for fun? Please, if you do not believe check out the Polish side of Dancing with the Stars. Yours!

Would you please put your concerns on talk:Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12? That will get the process started. There has been a considerable amount of work put into the page which is unusual for a hoax. You might want to contact the page creator (click the history tab at the top of the page). He is recently active and might be able to give you more information. As this is an established article, the process to delete it is documented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion I hope this helps. If you have more questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I do not lie. The contribution is, I see. But it is all invented! This program was not! For example, Agata Kulesza, won the program but announced that he would never return to the program ... It is designed in ... Remove it. I know this person, who is doing it. Boy, age 14 Plays and creates tables that are unrealistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Rawalakot- Notable persons

The notable person Ghulam Ahmad you added and claimed to be from rawalakot is plainly untrue, you gave a wiki reference that he is on wikipedia, as per wiki profile, he was born in Indian poonch, and he worked for indian airforce, apart from that he had a company in pakistan for mining, how does it make him notable person. I lived in rawalakot many years and regularly visit there, never heard of Ghulam Ahmad from anyone. This suggests me that either you are Ghulam Ahmead or related to him. I would not like lied to be added on this page.

Ghulam Ahmad died in 2003 as did Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. There are sources on the web tying him to Rawalakot. Jim1138 (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I see you are running away from facts. You haven't yet told me why Ghulam Ahmad is notable in Rawalakot? Would you like to cite a source here which links him to Rawalakot. All notable person on rawalakot page are very well known in whole state of Jammu & kashmir, all except one remained president of the state. Please explain your relationship with Ghulam Ahmad, are you his sibling? No way Mr Ghulam Ahmad is notable or anyone knows him in rawalakot. I lived and worked in Rawalakot for many years and rawalakot district (poonch) is my birth place. Please correct the page here. riz 13:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Fact is Ghulam Ahmad lived in and is buried in Rawalakot. Why do say otherwise? It is supported by numerous sources: try google. Seem to be many that are not Wikipedia based. BTW: I am American and have no relatives from Pakistan or that area. Jim1138 (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for Comment on the Berlin page

Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Jim1138. Just a quick note of thanks for reporting IP 209.65.85.135. I was headed to AIV for the same reason. Vandal fighting is a never ending task here and your quick action helped protect WikiP and I appreciate it. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 19:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for ruining my day=

Why did you send this message to me? I have not edited Wikipedia today as I have not logged into my account. What you are doing is harrassment and if it carries on, I will be forced to make a formal complaint to Wikipedia about you. How dare you. How bloody dare you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.182.233 (talk) 08:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Somebody probably using your computer did edit RI:SE click "My contributions" in the upper right corner of the page. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 08:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for cleaning the garbage from my Talk page this morning. I appreciate it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Khator

I'm not making disruptive edits. Ok I was at first, but look at what I am changing before you judge me. The links that are cited don't substantiate what is said at all. It's public relations' lies and shame on you for allowing them to continue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.160.245 (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

The cited source makes no reference to "Hindu" nor "fundamentalist". Would suggest it is wp:or. Jim1138 (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

My UALR page "vandalism" is not vandalism at all, thank you

If someone makes an edit you don't like, that doesn't automatically make it vandalism. You might remind Junipel of that.

My edits to the University of Arkansas at Little Rock page are intended to inform the public and are made using sourced, verifiable statements of fact.

In my opinion, the university is located in an area of Little Rock that should be declared a demilitarized zone and patrolled by UN peacekeeping forces, but I didn't write THAT in the article.

Junipel just wants to sweep the facts under the rug, and only allow the establishment-approved information. Moonbeam 2012 (talk) 01:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Please discuss it in talk: talk:University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Compared with most articles on universities, there is way too much on safety. This is called undue bias and is not a neutral point of view Also, please read about the 3 revert rule Jim1138 (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Why are you deleting everything I edit now? Who the hell do you think you are? Moonbeam 2012 (talk) 02:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm willing to discuss anything, anywhere. If a university is having an ongoing crime problem, and UALR is, putting that (sourced) information into a wikipedia article is NOT "undue bias" regardless of what you, or Junipel, says. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonbeam 2012 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I was only fixing the WP:UNDUE concern. If there is a source concern also, feel free to reverse my edit, but please discuss the issue with the original contributor :) ZZArch ^{talk to me} 05:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ghulam Ahmad

I dont see what the issue is. There has been no issue for yeas, until Riztik makes one up. This article is clearly, accurate, if there are incaccuracies they should be shown, without even stating what the incaccuracies are you have tagged this. I have edited Wikipedia for a long time and never had these issues. I will appreciate if you would tell me what these issues are, so they can be resolved. 75.0.2.227 (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)