User talk:Gilderien

User	Talk	Adoption HQ	Articles	To Do	Subpages	DYK	Awards

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
6,581		Greece (talk)						Add sources
1,266		Master of Science (talk)						Add sources
371		British degree abbreviations (talk)						Add sources
7		Man in the Moon (event) (talk)						Add sources
140		Comparison of server-side JavaScript solutions (talk)						Add sources
95		HSQLDB (talk)						Add sources
22		Book talk (talk)						Cleanup
197		Shruti Marathe (talk)						Cleanup
47		Pariser Platz (talk)						Cleanup
1,119		Scripting language (talk)						Expand
16		Musée Bourdelle (talk)						Expand
396		The Romantics (film) (talk)						Expand
814		The Ren & Stimpy Show (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
791		Raoul Wallenberg (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
861		New York City Police Department (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
380		Toner (talk)						Merge
209		Fault-tolerant system (talk)						Merge
117		Master of Advanced Studies (talk)						Merge
174		Engineering education (talk)						Wikify
2		Royal Scottish Forestry Society (talk)						Wikify
92		M11 motorway (talk)						Wikify
3		Bangong suture (talk)						Orphan
1		Derek Lane (talk)						Orphan
0		T. Wilson (Petworth cricketer) (talk)						Orphan
70		Driskill Mountain (talk)						Stub
46		Le Parisien (talk)						Stub
15		Prosody (software) (talk)						Stub
35		Joanna Rutkowska (talk)						Stub
12		Lochaline (talk)						Stub
13		All and Everything (talk)						Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2013 Wikification Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Time to make a Sweep by Hahc21. Project News: Several proposals are currently ongoin at the project, including two requests for comment. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 282 articles passed in January! GA Task Forces: Some minor notes this month Member News: Member news Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 12 February 2012

Good Article Nominations Request For Comment

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

If you have any questions, you can ask me personally. I'm Ocaasi. I'm glad you're with us :) -- Ocaasi ^{leave me a message}

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Recruitment Centre

I just wanted to remind you that dead refs are OK in Good articles as long as they are cited properly. I sometimes forget aswell but the nominator usually reminds me. :P --Dom497 (talk) 12:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - my concern here was more about lack of verifiability but I shall bear it in mind.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 04:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

• News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches

• In the media: Chinese censorship

• Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities

• Special report: Jimmy Wales: media favors entertainment over raising public awareness

• Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS

• WikiProject report: For the love of stamps

• Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Diego García de Moguer

Alex Shih^Talk 12:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Georgia (country) to Georgia move suggestion

Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 00:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conceptualization (information science)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Conceptualization (information science). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

2012 pga tour q school graduates

I dont get why you changed my post on the 2012 pga tour q school graduating class results in 2013. If you would have bothered to have read my stuff everything was factual and verifiable.

It was constructive and factual so get your facts right glidden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.27.131.215 (talk) 01:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

It was not supported by any references, and had a distinctly negative tone. Negative comment on living persons must be sourced per WP:BLP.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 01:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

• In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

• Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

• WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

• Traffic report: Reddit creep

• Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

• News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

• Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 08:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Elbert

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Elbert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Sasata -- Sasata (talk) 01:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Paris (estimated annual readership: 3,134,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Paris to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for my slow response, but I wouldn't mind at all if you awarded those--in fact, it'd be a big help! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Interview request: Your interactions with new editors

I'm contacting you about a study that I'm running with TheOriginalSoni exploring newcomer mentorship activities in Wikipedia. I'd like to ask you a few questions about your interactions with newcomers and to explore how a tool like WP:Snuggle might make your work easier. The interview and demo session will take 30 minutes to an hour depending on how much time we spend discussing things. If you're interested, let me know. If not, disregard this message and I won't bother you again.

• Study overview: meta:Research:Peer_mentorship_and_snuggle
• Consent form: meta:Research:Peer_mentorship_and_snuggle/Consent

Thanks for your consideration. --EpochFail (talk • contribs) 15:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

1. Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
2. Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
3. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
4. Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
5. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
6. Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
7. Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
8. Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

• In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

• Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

• WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

• Traffic report: Reddit creep

• Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

• News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

• Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 15:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Report

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Good Articles for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Hope you have a great day! -buffbills7701 14:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Set building for DYK

You should probably read Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Rules of thumb for preparing updates. While some of the information there is dated (we are currently using 6 hooks per set instead of 8), many of the recommendations would be helpful in your efforts to produce balanced and varied sets. --Allen3 ^talk 19:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Is this in response to my proposal or my recent prep building, and if the latter is there anything improper about the way I have built them? I am aware of the supplementaty guidelines and strive to follow the spirit in set building.--Gilderien Chat|What I've done 19:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

The last two sets you have built have both had multiple hooks dealing with species of fungus. Additionally, both sets have contained an additional hook dealing with a species of animal. Consistently dedicating half of your updates to species articles does not appear to follow with recommendation to use a varied set of topics. --Allen3 ^talk 19:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, well thank you for raising your concerns. I was careful not to exceed the stated limit of 50%, but unfortunately due to the WikiCup there is a pre-ponderance of species articles, particularly of fungi - I just counted up to half way on the noms page and found 16 approved species articles, mostly by Sasata, and that was after I removed 6 in my prep sets. At the last update we had 61 approved hooks, so with at least 22 that is nearly 40% of available articles being species-orientated.--Gilderien Talk|List of good deeds 20:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) My view has always been that if we have an excess of something like fungi, they just need to wait longer: parceling them out one at a time takes less than a week, after all. US-based or bio hooks can get to 50% in a set, but they're the only ones given that specific permission; other than those two categories, it's rare that something should get even two slots: two UK occasionally, or two sports if there's a real glut of those (and those selected are very different from each other). I'd consider two species to be a ceiling for any set, unless we were had only half a dozen approved hooks. If 40% of available articles are species-oriented, then 60% are not. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

FYI, the surge of species articles is due primarily to the final round of Wikipedia:WikiCup starting today. DYK nominations should return to a more normal mix in a week or so and, as BlueMoonset indicates, we can work off the backlog in about another week to ten days without changing our normal processes and procedures. It is only when we have surges that are large and prolonged (e.g. athlete biographies and event articles from the 2012 Summer Olympic) that DYK has historically changed the normal mix of hooks within promoted sets. --Allen3 ^talk 22:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

• In the media: Manning "put back in the closet"; State involvement in Azerbaijani Wikipedia

• News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up

• Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds

• Discussion report: Arbcom election procedures, Wiki Loves Monuments, Privacy policy, FDC, and more

• Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt

• WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion

• Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Good Article Medal of Merit / The DYK Medal
		Thank you for your transformative RFC that gets WP:GA some exposure on the main page through its WP:DYK portal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Tip of the hat

	Tip of the hat
	A tip of the hat for your extreme perseverance in pursuing the Good Article RfC against the extreme resistance to change that occurs here from time to time. Another hat tip for your positive good nature in the face of wikilawyering and filibustering in the months leading up to this. The much unloved Wikipedia reader will be better served by this. First Light (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2013

Delivered September 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

• In the media: Lawyer goes to court to discover Wikipedian's identity; Storming Wikipedia; Wikimedia UK Secretary in conflict-of-interest controversy; Does Wikipedia need a "right to reply" box?

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia

• Featured content: Tintin goes featured

• News and notes: As deadline approaches, Individual Engagement Grants looks for ideas

• Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!

• Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Re:Singpost

Yes, thank you very much. I am already working in my responses. Again, thank oyu very much :D Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 19:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wolf attacks on humans

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wolf attacks on humans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

who exactly are you ?

I am a novice at best with all this & computers in general. Explain70.192.204.79 (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC) what your message means & why I should pay you any regard ?