User talk:Störm

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Greenbörg, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 23:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	In recognition of your recent contributions and article submissions. Keep it up. Mar4d (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Another barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For self-closing a recent AfD nomination you made when sufficient evidence for a GNG pass came to light rather than fighting things to the last ditch as a point of honor. This is the way the process is supposed to work, yet many let their egos get in the way of the greater good of the project. Thanks for your action, it was noted and should be publicly congratulated. Carrite (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Greenbörg (talk) 05:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Störm, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.1% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for September: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/54|Hispanic and Latina women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/55|Women in the Olympics]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/56|Women from New Zealand]] Coming up in October: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/57|Women and disability]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/58|Healthcare]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/59|Geofocus: Nordic countries]] Continuing from month to month: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Störm, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

AfDs re Sri Lankan players

Hello, you were sadly mistaken when you wrote: "Delete it as this is established by previous AfDs that bios of these players should not be all stats. I don't think we will ever have coverage from which we can write enough biography for him. Not discussed in detail by multiple sources so we can write enough without WP:OR".

First, none of these Sri Lankan articles breach WP:NOTSTATS because they are written in prose with few if any statistics. Second, you need to read WP:NEXIST and take into account the Perera case re coverage in Sinhalese sources. Third, there is no original research in any of these articles.

Let me know if you want to query anything. It just seems to me that you have got the wrong end of a stick somehow. Thanks. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

BlackJack Thanks for writing this. I don't know what to say. I previously tried to stop this spree of AfDs and you know better I always defended WP:CRIN. But then, I found only two or three people defending WP:CRIN and other give more weight-age to WP:GNG and have no interest in WP:CRIC so that was protest kind of votes. I still want to defend WP:CRIN but also want a public thorough discussion to little amend the WP:CRIN or find a way to stop all these. I think that these guidelines are 10 years old so its almost a decade that we haven't changed anything to these guidelines. We should open-heartedly welcome any change either small or large in scale to make these guidelines compatible. This is also necessary so we all can come on same page. We have to understand that there is no line-in-the-sand and that every thing gets updated with time. Then, I think we should identify patterns that newspapers give detail coverage for which type of tournament or cricketer so at least we don't rely on only two sources. I think we can do this because almost all test-playing nations has enough English-language newspapers and we can search all cricket related coverage on their websites. So, maybe this is the time to make our guidelines equivalent with other guidelines so they can comply on Wikipedia. If I did anything wrong then forget that. Thanks. Störm (talk) 16:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Well, CRIN was created about a dozen years ago and it has changed many times, though never in terms of its basic principle that one senior appearance presumes notability for WP purposes (same for baseball, football and all the rest). I personally am always happy to discuss CRIN and I've written changes into it that I didn't support, but consensus was against me. I believe that the site's notability problems are with WP:N and especially the GNG part of it because it is contradictory. Trying to get it updated is effectively a non-starter. I do firmly agree, however, that there must be at least two sources always to meet WP:V and they must be inline. I sort of specialise in early cricket and I absolutely will not let CricketArchive anywhere near those articles because, for anything before the 1860s, it is unreliable as I've said many times. The problem with Sri Lanka, probably with Bangladesh too, is that there isn't enough English coverage before about ten years ago but they do have it over there in their own Sinhalese and Bengali newspapers. Maybe this discussion that's started at CRIC will produce something but, for now at least, I'm opposing the proposal. Anyway, thanks for replying and all the best. Good luck with your new name too which is a good one for us in GB as we've had a succession of storms lately including a hurricane!! Jack | ^{talk page} 19:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Storm

It was a total surprise to see nice comments that you made about me. It rarely happens on Wikipedia and I do appreciate the Barnstar that you gave me...Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Unnecessary double disambiguation?

Hey, I just noticed you moved the article Asukai Masaaki (17th century) to Asukai Masaaki (17th century poet).

Thing is, I came up with the original title based on a discussion of an article with similar problems here. I can see the problem that my original disambiguator was not a direct description of the person himself, but the way you changed it it looks kinda like there are are multiple Asukai Masaakis in the 17th century and that article is about the one who was a poet (although, if there was another 17th century Asukai Masaaki, he would have almost certainly also been a poet). As far as I am aware, the only other Asukai Masaaki is a 13th-century figure who was also a poet. And both of them were also apparently notable as kemari players.

I am not that hooked on it either way, and honestly disambiguators are one of those things I often just don't "get", so if you could explain to me how I got it wrong I wouldn't be offended or even all that surprised. (Although we'd probably have to reopen that Tang emperor discussion since I basically came up with the current title and everyone followed me, which would make it the blind leading the blind...)

Cheers!

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 08:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hijiri88 At least we can't use word 'poet' because there are two poets, right? Then we have to use the year in which he/she born or century so I went with 17th century. We can't just say (17th century) because when someone will be finding him he/she will know that he is a '17th century poet' so it will be easy for him/her to find him. Anyways, you may change it if you like because you better know about such titles. Störm (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Shit, you're right. I thought I went with "17th century" and you added the unnecessary "poet". Sorry for the mixup. Pretty much everything I wrote above can probably be dismissed as based on a misunderstanding.

Anyway, if I recall correctly, my reason for not disambiguating the title of the 17th century figure was that he is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. My logic behind this was somewhat flawed, however: the 17th century figure has a standalone article in the Nihon Koten Bungaku Daijiten, while the 13th century figure is only name-dropped in their article on the Asukai family. I wanted to write entries on both for Wikipedia Asian Month, but couldn't find enough sources on a quick Googling to build more than a stub on the 13th century one. This means the 17th century figure is definitely more important (at least to literary history) than the 13th century one, but I honestly have no idea if any significant percentage of English Wikipedia's readership would be more likely to have heard of the 17th century figure and more likely be looking for our article on him.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing up the things. Störm (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Störm! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:25, Saturday, December 16, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

List of Sri Lankan cricketers

I encourage you for your ideas in saving the cricket biographies relating to 1870's, 1900's etc. But I have a confusing stuff related to 2 articles which are interrelated to each other. List of cricketers from Sri Lanka is a list article which is almost kept empty. Can we redirect this list to List of Sri Lankan cricketers? Abishe (talk) 10:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

@Abishe: Done. Previous page is now on Lists of Sri Lankan cricketers. Hope this solved the problem. Happy editing. Störm (talk) 10:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!

Hello Störm: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas Störm!!


Hi Störm, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
   –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to everyone and Season's Greetings!🎄🔔🎆🎇🎁✨🌠🌟

Hello Störm: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Abishe (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I thank you for your suggestions and support that you gave me. Thanks for your great efforts and contributions to Wikipedia. Merry Christmas late wishes and a Prosperous New Year 2018. I hope you will continue your momentum in the near future. Abishe (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

WAM Address Collection

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your postal mailing address via Google form or email me about that on erick@asianmonth.wiki before the end of Janauary, 2018. The Wikimedia Asian Month team only has access to this form, and we will only share your address with local affiliates to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. We apologize for the delay in sending this form to you, this year we will make sure that you will receive your postcard from WAM. If you've not received a postcard from last year's WAM, Please let us know. All ambassadors will receive an electronic certificate from the team. Be sure to fill out your email if you are enlisted Ambassadors list.

Best, Erick Guan (talk)

Happy New Year, Störm!

Happy New Year!

Störm,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Al-Sadiq Mosque, Bahawalpur

Thank you for your contribution but you should explain, why do you find the mosque notable. Is the building old/beautiful? Is it socially important?Xx236 (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Is there such page in an another (Urdu ?) Wikipedia?Xx236 (talk) 08:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

The page is an orphan. Please link it (in Bahawalpur ?)Xx236 (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@Xx236: Right now, I'm stubbing all the tourist attractions. I'll expand them later using the citations I've already added with each new article. Thanks. Störm (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

WAM Address Collection - 1st reminder

Hi there. This is a reminder to fill the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your postal mailing address via this Google form. This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems in accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let us know at WAM talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Sailesh Patnaik

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your tireless and often-times, tedious work on BLP's related to Pakistani personalities. Your contributions are well appreciated! Saqib (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Feburary 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/67|"Black women"]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/68|"Mathematicians and statisticians"]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/69|"Geofocus: Island women"]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Recommendations for your WikiProject Cricket will be delivered soon

Hi Störm,

Thank you for your interest in using our tool. Sorry about the wait. We've been working on improving our tool in the past several weeks, and we will send recommendations to you very soon. Stay tuned. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 23:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for your kind gesture. Looking forward to our cooperation in future, making Wikipedia a better place for everyone.  M A A Z   T A L K  18:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Recommending new editors to your WP Cricket

Hi Störm,

Our system generated a list of potential new editors for your project. They may be interested in collaborating with your project members on your project's articles. As you will notice, the list contains both experienced editors and newcomers. Both are valuable for Wikipedia and your project. Please go ahead and introduce your project to them, and point them to some project tasks to start with. We also provide a template invitation message to make it easier to contact the potential new editors. Just click the invite link to write the invitation message.

We'd appreciate it if you could fill the survey to let us know what you think about our recommendations so we can improve our system.

Username	Why we recommend this editor	First Edit Date	Total Edits in ENWP	Editor Status	Invite	Survey
Steinfeld-feld (talk · contribs)	Steinfeld-feld's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2017-4-12	28	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Sagarbhathwar (talk · contribs)	Sagarbhathwar's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2010-5-12	30	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Peelusrinivasan (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2007-5-13	67	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Mortazahafeez (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-5-25	49	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Krntwd (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-8-11	52	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
MilleniumFalcon1977 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2013-6-20	76	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Prathamag2003 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2015-5-17	82	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Divu2056 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-2-1	328	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Sm105 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2004-7-18	204	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Marcs Wiki (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2009-12-22	64	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Governeraslan (talk · contribs)	Governeraslan's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2015-11-14	22	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Clarktricia86 (talk · contribs)	Clarktricia86's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2014-8-30	45	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey

Please let me know below if you have any general feedback about our recommendations. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Störm, Just wonder if you had a chance to look at the recommendations I sent? Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Bobo.03: Hi too, because cricket is followed in limited countries so many of above are unrelated. The underline ones are very helpful. So, overall good effort. Thanks for making these suggestions. Störm (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hmm.. Ideally, I don't think it matters for the tool whether there is any limitation on the project topics - it should just identify the most relevant editors existing in the scope of Wikipedia. In this trial, I find some bugs that caused introducing not most relevant editors. I've fixed it, and hopefully, it will send better candidates next time! Bobo.03 (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Recommending new editors to WikiProject Cricket

Hi Störm,

Here is a new list of recommendations for project Cricket. Sorry that I introduced some bugs in the previous version as I mentioned, but everything has been fixed. I might be sending one or two more new lists to you in the coming Mondays, and hope you'll find great new members!

Username	Why we recommend this editor	First Edit Date	Total Edits in ENWP	Editor Status	Invite	Survey
Bullswool98 (talk · contribs)	Bullswool98's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2013-6-10	15	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Dannywattylufc1908 (talk · contribs)	Dannywattylufc1908's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2016-12-3	20	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Realuali (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-12-28	73	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Raghavendra Rao T (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2013-8-16	45	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Ayodhya Sovis (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2011-6-14	78	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Realstarsp (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2018-1-11	17	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Schods (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2014-10-6	273	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
NikhilArela (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2010-6-20	114	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Mc2175 (talk · contribs)	Mc2175's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2017-7-26	264	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Leebo131 (talk · contribs)	Leebo131's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2017-3-4	186	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Aldy (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2009-4-26	880	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Chrisclear (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-10-20	123	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey

Bobo.03 (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Störm, please take a look at those recommendations if you have a chance, and let me know what do you think. Thank you! I would also help invite some new members, but they are not the ones on this list. Bobo.03 (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons. Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/70|Women's History Month 2018]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Rollback request

Hi,

There was a vandalism on the Pakistan Stock Exchange page on 16 December 2017 that went unnoticed. As a result, the page's infobox is lost. Can you please do a rollback on said page to the 3 December 2017 version as I see that you have made a couple of edits on it since the vandalism.

Thank you. - Wiki.0hlic 15:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Wiki.0hlic Done. Thanks for keeping an eye. Störm (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Störm Thank you for the quick fix! - Wiki.0hlic 15:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Störm, thank you for the kind words you left in my talk page. If you ever need some support for your project, let me know and I'll do what I can. Dr. Vogel (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Recommending new editors to WikiProject Cricket

Hi Störm,

Here is a new list of recommendations for WikiProject Cricket. Please take a look when you get a chance. Thank you!

Username	Why we recommend this editor	First Edit Date	Total Edits in ENWP	Editor Status	Invite	Survey
Mortazahafeez (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2017-5-25	52	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Mkarki12 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2016-12-20	59	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Yourmistake (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2018-1-9	58	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
DiamondIIIXX (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2015-7-6	65	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Dannywattylufc1908 (talk · contribs)	Dannywattylufc1908's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2016-12-3	20	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Toonjamie (talk · contribs)	Toonjamie's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2009-3-27	75	Newcomer: made less than 100 edits.	invite	survey
Atcovi (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2013-9-28	572	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Wesutf1 (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits that are similar to your project members indicate they will be interested in editing your project's articles. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2015-8-6	195	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Asheshneupane95 (talk · contribs)	Asheshneupane95's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2014-5-2	975	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
Hamza Ali Shah (talk · contribs)	Hamza Ali Shah's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project!	2018-2-23	168	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
TheLupineOne (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2010-4-1	124	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey
BJ Hash (talk · contribs)	These editors might not be aware of your project. Their recent edits on project-related articles indicate their interest to your project. Their recent edits also show their good editing records. Invite them to your project. They will have the opportunity to contribute more!	2016-5-7	133	Experienced Editor: made less than 1,000 edits.	invite	survey

Bobo.03 (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Störm. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

You've got mail!

Hello, Störm. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons. Focus on: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/71|April+Further with Art+Feminism]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/72|Archaeology]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/73|Military history (contest)]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/74|Geofocus: Indian subcontinent]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred --Rosiestep (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Invitation to WikiProject Portals

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons. File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/75|"Women of the Sea"]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/76|"Villains"]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/77|"Women in Sports"]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/78|"Central Eastern European women"]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wiki Loves Food

Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Improvement of this page

Hi,

Hope you are doing good, can you please help improve this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haroon_Janjua

Regards HaroonJanjua (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Thanks!

	All the best from Berlin
	Just saw some useful edit from you - and soon noticed your German ancestry. Best wishes from a Berliner, proud to be born and living in Berlin. (The emotion "proud to be German" just does not exist) Volker Siegel (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red June Editathons

		Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/79|WiR Loves Pride]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/80|Singers and Songwriters]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/81|Women in GLAM]] New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/82|Geofocus: Russia/USSR]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

PROD

You might consider WP:PROD for nominations of things such as non-notable Catholic churches/parishes if the deletion is unlikely to be controversial. Saves a lot of time all around. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

TonyBallioni Will do next time. Störm (talk) 08:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

CIP

Hi. I undid your edit to CIP because there's no mention of CIP in Immigrant investor programs (the page to which Citizenship by investment redirects) and you didn't cite a source. Please feel free to add it back if you can cite WP:RS for the connection and add it to the Immigrant investor programs article. Thanks, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018 at Women in Red

		Hello again from Women in Red! July 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/83|Sub-Saharan Africa]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/84|Film + stage]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/85|20th-century]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/86|Women Rock]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|Notable women, broadly-construed!]] Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Are we losing momentum? London calling (the Mayor of London!) Publication about Wikipedia's coverage of women mathematicians Women in Red is featured in Toolhub
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfD

Hi Störm. Following on from this AfD you started, I've now logged this one. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018 at Women in Red

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/87|Indigenous women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/88|Women of marginalized populations]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/89|Women writers]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/90|Geofocus: Bottom 10]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed!]] For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Khan Sidebar

Hello Storm, guess we need sidebar like Template:Nawaz Sharif sidebar for Imran Khan. Can you maybe help with this? --Saqib (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Saqib I was busy and had some running errands so thats why I missed your message. Btw thanks for starting it, I'll join and expand it later. Störm (talk) 11:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Go ahead! --Saqib (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

if you're unsatisfied with my argument concerning Muhammad Tariq Dreshak, feel free to recreate the page and we may take it to AfD for wider community discussion. --Saqib (talk) 07:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Saqib I think if it is not official, then, we can leave it. I don't think it would be right to create and then subsequently nominate it for AfD. Although, we can discuss with the community, maybe at any Admin noticeboard. Störm (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Impressed with the number of Pakistan-related articles you have CREATED on Wikipedia. Run into them often. Cheers... Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Carry on your good work Storm. --Saqib (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Ngrewal1 Many thanks for appreciating, I hope I'll continue to improve Pakistan-related articles. Störm (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Imran Khan

Hi, I wanted to ask that should the controversies of Imran Khan regarding his personal life really be included in the biography. Since most of those allegations have never been proven. For example, the ones you added recently. Just like the personal life controversies regarding many alleged partners are not included in Donald Trump , I think they shouldn't be included here too. However if you think they are important, you can ignore what I say, since you are more of an experienced editor. Thanks Knightrises10 (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Knightrises10 Most of my addition is reported by many notable newspapers and is per WP:RS. I am all for removal of Reham Khan's allegations which we will separate into new page. I don't think you need to worry which should be there or which not, WP is WP:NOTCENSOR. Everything is allowed if it is cited by WP:RS and written in a neutral way. I always try to write in a neutral way thats what I can say. Thanks. Störm (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Knightrises10 And here they are. Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape, Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations, Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal, Racial views of Donald Trump. You see they are full-fledged articles. Störm (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Störm ok, it's my mistake.. And yes, I accept that what you added is fully accepted due to reliable sources.. I just asked that if they really should be included. Anyways, sorry once again. Knightrises10 (talk) 21:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The BLP Barnstar
		Thank you for maintaining NPOV on Imran Khan and daring to expand the coverage of the aspect not touched by many with a ten foot pole, you brought a Störm 🌀 there! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 02:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks for this Sheriff. Störm (talk) 10:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

I can see a lot of awards pouring in Storm but are you sure Reham Khan is former wife of Bill Clinton? --Saqib (talk) 18:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Saqib I started it using My Life (Bill Clinton autobiography) in which I forgot to remove his name. Sometimes it happens when your concentration is somewhere. Störm (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes it happens so no offense! --Saqib (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

That was funny though, I had a laugh! 😀 Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 02:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained move of category

Hello Störm, please take your concerns to the talk page before you change categories like Category:Iranian emigrants to the Mughal Empire, thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

HistoryofIran It is obvious that when they emigrated they were part of Persian Empire. If you want to be precise then we can move 'Persian' to 'Persian Empire emigrants'. See similar cat e.g. Category:Russian emigrants to the United States. If you've any concern then you may start a WP:RfC or show me any consensus and I'll happily revert. Otherwise, you're bias here with the name of 'Iran' ('Persia' switched to 'Iran' in 1935 so we can only name those people Iranian) and I suggest you should consult a neutral point of view.