User talk:RHaworth/2019 May 16: Difference between revisions
SkyWarrior (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
* You need to learn wikilinks thus: [[Draft:AdoptOpenJDK]], to log in before writing here and to sign your message with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. I have looked. The new version does not appear to be a copyvio. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
* You need to learn wikilinks thus: [[Draft:AdoptOpenJDK]], to log in before writing here and to sign your message with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. I have looked. The new version does not appear to be a copyvio. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
* Sorry I'm rather new to Wikipedia! Thanks for reviewing! hopefully it gets accepted this time :) --[[User:Gdams1|Gdams1]] ([[User talk:Gdams1|talk]]) 12:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Help re. contents on deleted page == |
== Help re. contents on deleted page == |
Revision as of 12:37, 7 May 2019
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives
Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]
Sinovoip
I am looking into the possibility that User:Sinovoip has a COI regarding [ http://www.sinovoip.com.cn/eindex.asp ]. I noticed that you deleted their userpage under U5. Was the nature of the deleted page such that it supports a conclusion of a COI, or was it unrelated to the sinovoip.com.cn website and the products they sell?
- Sinovoip (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Banana Pi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Webduino (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Comparison of single-board computers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
-- Guy Macon (talk) 03:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you feel the need for more evidence? Surely their edits to Banana Pi scream COI loud enough. But i have emailed you their user page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Shanaya makani
Okay so I found a page in the new page feed of Shanaya makani who I was unsure of notability, so the first thing I was going to do though was to see if there was a page for Shanaya Makani and move it there since that be uppercase, looks like it has been salted, so I was wondering if this is the same person and if this page should be salted also. Thanks. (Looks like there is also a Draft:Shanaya Makani.) I was originally going to do a AFD until I saw it was page protected so I figure i ask you since you salted it. — Wgolf (talk) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- All states consolidated at Shanaya Makani. Go ahead and start the AfD discussion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Grid reference
An editor posted at the help desk that they were having trouble with the grid coordinates. Curious, I went to an article they edited, Abbots Wood Junction railway station and clicked on grid reference, saw an error and then saw your name. Will also ping you at the help desk. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @Timtempleton: See User talk:RHaworth#OS coordinates down above. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Christian Francis Roth - Deleted Page
Hi, You deleted my draft, which was waiting for approval. The reason was "unambiguous copyright infringement" but the content you claim was infringed upon came from my own website, so I am only copying from myself. I am Christian Francis Roth. Can you please restore the draft, and perhaps even approve it for publishing? I have been waiting several months for approval. My references are from well known publications and the subject matter is valid and noteworthy according to your editors who have helped me work through the writing style so that the subject could be approved more quickly. Thank you, Christian Francis Roth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grindylow212 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- One obvious change is to place a {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} or compatible declaration on the copyvio source. Even though TheForeignOne is allowed to say "kindly" (see below), I am no longer allowed to use the word. So I will just say: when you become notable enough that other people write about you in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone with no CoI will be interested enough to come here and write your biography. I am willing to email your text - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
i understand
from now on i will be a good faith contributor. I will only make pages if 1. there isnt a page for something I know about and it lets me make it or 2. emergency. I will continue to make edits similar to the one in Five Nights at Freddy's 2. Cya! Captain Yoshi (talk) 21:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- I moved this from User talk:RHaworth/2019 Apr 27, where it was incorrectly posted. — CoolSkittle (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yoshi, noted.
- CoolSkittle, this confirms my policy of protecting my talk archives. This is the first time, probably in years that I have forgotten to do the protect and, sure enough, someone writes there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I kindly ask you to provide the content of my deleted article Draft:Guilan Science and Technology Park for further editing so it can meet the specified guidelines. Thank you. TheForeignOne (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)TheForeignOne
- And kindly tell me how you expected me to provide it. Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
request for material that was deleted
RHaworth - Thank you for reviewing my article on 1628 ltd (company). I understand it didn't meet Wiki guidelines, but would like to use the content for a blog post on an affiliate site. Could you please send it to <redacted> or wikipedia user Backscheider? Thank you for understanding compiling a page takes time and the content is still useful outside of Wikipedia. — Aubrey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Backscheider (talk • contribs)
- I am pleased to see that in 1628 John Jackson spelled the word with an hyphen in the right place so that people do think that you are all orking lots of cows. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
U1... err, G7
Thanks for speedy deleting Template:Ellipsis. I didn't realize that I'd used the wrong speedy deletion criteria when I tagged it, but I appreciate you handling it appropriately. — eπi (talk | contribs) 18:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Normally I would have deleted the page with your U1 tag in place but at the moment I feel that I am being stalked by people eager to criticise my every action, so I changed it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- "I feel that I am being stalked by people eager to criticise my every action" I'm sorry you feel like that, but it's not true. If I can offer some advice (which I appreciate given the current climate may not be appreciated, but still) .... stop using the admin tools for a bit. Don't delete anything, block anyone, or use any tags. WP:AIV and CAT:CSD are not going to suddenly get insanely backlogged if you have a break. East Croydon station is assessed as B-class, but I find that questionable as much of the content is unreferenced and the article could do with a good copyedit. Why not have a go at that? You can get most of the source material you need from Ian Allan's bookshop near Waterloo, and the British Transport Museum shop probably has some suitable books, as no doubt has your local library. Or, if you're really stuck, Redrose64 has a ridiculously large corpus of The Railway Magazine archives to work with. Or, even easier, Balham (memorably described by Peter Sellers as "Bal-ham, gateway to the south!") needs a proper lead. Give article writing another go, and you'll suddenly discover how much nicer this place can be. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Subpages
Hey RH, saw you deleted Portal:Stargate bacause a redirect should not have been created when it was projectified, but redirects were also created for all of Portal:Stargate's subpages during the move; could you delete those subpage redirects as well, or do I need to CSD G8 them? — UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks; Portal:Gene Wiki also has subpages, could you delete those as well? Appreciate it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Alfwin Fernando
"Leave me to create my user page again, please, please, please." Please restore my user page. I am begging to you, Leave me to create my user page again, please, please, please. Alfwin Fernando (talk) 10:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Please restore my user page. I promise you that I will not do the mistake again. Alfwin Fernando (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, Alfwin Fernando, this is a second opinion. RHaworth was entirely right to delete the page. I would have deleted it myself. You will not succeed in having it restored, so please stop wasting people's time with your requests. -- Hoary (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Editor blocked for sockpuppetry. — CoolSkittle (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Too some extent you shot yourself in the foot because of your strange idea: "to create an article about Joe Blogs, I must create a user account with that name and put the bio up as their user page". But the lack of notability of your subjects did not help either. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Editor blocked for sockpuppetry. — CoolSkittle (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
AdoptOpenJDK
Hi there, I have fixed up the AdoptOpenJDK draft. Could you take a second look now please? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AdoptOpenJDK Many thanks George — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.247.157 (talk)
- You need to learn wikilinks thus: Draft:AdoptOpenJDK, to log in before writing here and to sign your message with ~~~~. I have looked. The new version does not appear to be a copyvio. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry I'm rather new to Wikipedia! Thanks for reviewing! hopefully it gets accepted this time :) --Gdams1 (talk) 12:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Help re. contents on deleted page
Hi Roger, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you could help me. A while back I tagged University of Calgary as being edited by a potentially connected user. I used a diff on a now deleted talk page as support for this. The user has engaged me in a conversation about the possible COI and I would like to review my rationale from back then. Would it be possible to access this diff. Cheers! pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- For reasons which I can just about understand, when I view deleted pages the revision id of each edit is hidden from me - instead the link is via a time stamp. So I have emailed you the entire discussion. If you really want to see the exact diff report, give me the timestamps. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Great, thanks. The download contained exactly what I needed for the rationale. Thanks again, very helpful! pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 21:07, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Page: UTP Merchant Services
Ref: link Hi RHaworth, I am new to this, but understand you deleted the page UTP Merchant Services on the lines that it breached copyright infringements (you supplied links to the articles in question and to let you know that I wrote those articles). I did use a couple of phrases from them (I must confess) as I felt it is a good explaination, but I can confirm that I wrote those articles you referenced and should you need any proof, happy to supply. Everything else in that page complies with the Wiki rules.
Can you please reconsider your decision for deletion or help me with suggestions for this to work. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards -- Paulutp1 (talk) 11:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Paulutp1
- Suggestion: when your company becomes notable enough that other people write about it in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone with no CoI will be interested enough to come here and write about it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Global Hotelier deletion
Dear Mr. Haworth, You recently deleted my first attempt at a Wikipedia article, entitled Global Hotelier. As a freelance writer, I felt it would be beneficial for me to get some hands on experience contributing for this free global resource. I chose a company who are brand new to the scene, yet in my opinion will be huge in years to come. That was my motivation, to be the first to write an article on an unknown that will later gain renown. Your reasons for removing my content was that it was promotional / advertising. I hoped that I had been completely objective, sticking to technical data and facts that I took from the companies web site as well as reputable sources such as Bitcoin Magazine and Forbes Magazine.
If you can spare the time please let me know which sections you feel were not acceptable so that I may correct them. I would very much like my first addition to Wikipedia to be successfully published, and feel a little disheartened by the removal of the entire article without knowing where I went wrong. Any help that you can afford me would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Warmest Regards, Christopher Roper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristopherRoper (talk • contribs)
P.S I do not understand why 'Merchant Services' link is appearing at the foot of this post. My post is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Global_Hotelier&action=edit&redlink=1 . I will place the content back onto this draft so that you may recap which elements required change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristopherRoper (talk • contribs)
- When you write about a page it is far more useful to bracket its title with [[]] rather than "" . When your company becomes notable enough that other people write about it in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone with no CoI will be interested enough to come here and write about it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- User:ChristopherRoper - I see that you haven't answered the question about whether you have a conflict of interest. That is an answer, just not an answer that complies with Wikipedia rules. I also see that you are asking in detail what portions of your draft need correction. The way that you are wording that question, very eager to make specified tweaks to a draft, is characteristic of editors who are being paid on contingency, that is, who need to get the article accepted in order to be paid. My advice to you is that there are other easier ways to make a living, even within the sphere of freelance writing. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
B. J. Snowden
Why does BJ Snowden (which you deleted and protected) not redirect to B. J. Snowden? — JudahH (talk) 14:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- It was a "dirty po" in my opinion. A Google search for "BJ Snowden" (with quotes round it) returns the article as its first hit. Ditto, a wiki search. So I say we do not need a redirect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
ANI thread
A lot of people think you do good work for Wikipedia, time to prove them right. Good luck and happy editing! (might want to slow down on those deletions ) -- qedk (t 桜 c) 15:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
deletion of John Edmonds (artist)
Hi RHaworth, I see you deleted the page for John Edmonds (artist). I'm sorry if it was a copyvio, I thought I ran it through the earwig copy violation check site. Could you email me the code or restore as a draft and let me clean it up? Thank you -- Wil540 art (talk) 22:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not just copyvio, style-vio - "the performative gestures and self-fashioning" would be read by some as pretentious buzzwords. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, RHaworth! Had I missed something at Draft:2004 Alor earthquake when I removed the G12 tag that Sphilbrick had put on it, leaving the edit summary "decline G12, this content was copied from revision 869611460 of Alor Island; this edit summary provides attribution"? As far as I can see, the content has been in our page since about 2006, whereas the external blog post is dated 31 August 2010. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- Edit conflict. I had open in a browser tab the 2019-05-03t12:33:12 state of the article so I never saw that in the mean time you had removed the speedy tag. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Template:Vexill used by Infobox castrum
Hi, you deleted Template:Vexill affecting the display of Template:Infobox castrum (eg. Castra of Hoghiz). Please fix all the instances where Template:Vexill is used. -- Regards, Saturnian (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- So how come it took a fortnight for anyone to notice the deletion? Restored and the applier of the speedy tag has been admonished. Appropriate example Hoghiz - I shall be going to Romania in October and will add it to my suggested itinerary. In fact it is stand-alone template which can be used anywhere not just in template:Infobox castrum. Also, it probably ought to have a "this template must be substed" setting to remove a totally unnecessary template resolution when viewing a page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, it was by accident. I added a new picture noticing that wrong text in infobox. I was surprised that someone decided deleting that template after it was fine in the last six years. Thank you for the fix. I'm glad that you will visit my country. Here we have more than 170 Roman forts but only few of them have touristic potential. It is a nice landscape at Hoghiz but the fort itself is not obvious. -- Saturnian (talk) 20:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
![]() |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Template:Z152
Deletion of Pokémon Detective Pikachu
I'm confused as to why you deleted this redirect. You deleted it as a "temporary category", but it's not a category. Was it a mistake, or am I missing something? SkyWarrior 20:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Uhhh, I don't know why you moved the article title to the (then-)deleted redirect, since it's currently under discussion (I've reverted it back due to that) and I didn't request for you to do that (I was just wondering why you deleted the redirect in the first place). SkyWarrior 22:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) To editor SkyWarrior: An editor previously closed the RM out of process with this edit, and then placed a speedy deletion box on this redirect so the article could be moved to this title. That's why the redirect was deleted and the page was moved. Somewhere in between I reverted the close. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 03:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- That makes sense, though the logs suggest that this didn't happen somewhere between the closure revert. Instead, all this happened after your revert (you reverted the close at 16:08 (UTC); the first deletion happened at 20:36, the restoration (?) at 21:43, and the second deletion/move at 21:46). All this also happened while the RM notice was still on the article (it was never removed when the discussion was closed) and the discussion ongoing; it also doesn't explain the initial deletion reason as a "temporary category" (which I'm assuming was an honest mistake). SkyWarrior 07:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, I said exactly that: "somewhere in between I reverted the close", which means I reverted the close between the time the speedy deletion template was placed on the redirect and the time RHaworth deleted the redirect and moved the page. The "temporary category" language is probably just a reminder that the deletion is temporary and awaiting the page move. I only caught all this because the RM closure was out-of-process and resulted in a "malformed request", which I monitor. RHaworth was monitoring the speedy deletion log and just acted upon an entry in that log. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 08:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but unless things were removed from the logs that I'm not seeing, your claim of "I reverted the close between the time the speedy deletion template was placed on the redirect and the time RHaworth deleted the redirect and moved the page" is just straight up false, since RHaworth deleted the page four hours after you reverted the close (and moving it one hour after that, or about 40 minutes after I initially left the message on his talk), not between it. That also doesn't explain the restoration RHaworth did before deleting it again and moving.
- As for the "temporary category" thing, RHaworth appears to have been actually deleting temporary categories and the redirect probably got caught into the mix accidentally. A mistake, it seems. SkyWarrior 18:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, I said exactly that: "somewhere in between I reverted the close", which means I reverted the close between the time the speedy deletion template was placed on the redirect and the time RHaworth deleted the redirect and moved the page. The "temporary category" language is probably just a reminder that the deletion is temporary and awaiting the page move. I only caught all this because the RM closure was out-of-process and resulted in a "malformed request", which I monitor. RHaworth was monitoring the speedy deletion log and just acted upon an entry in that log. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 08:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- That makes sense, though the logs suggest that this didn't happen somewhere between the closure revert. Instead, all this happened after your revert (you reverted the close at 16:08 (UTC); the first deletion happened at 20:36, the restoration (?) at 21:43, and the second deletion/move at 21:46). All this also happened while the RM notice was still on the article (it was never removed when the discussion was closed) and the discussion ongoing; it also doesn't explain the initial deletion reason as a "temporary category" (which I'm assuming was an honest mistake). SkyWarrior 07:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) To editor SkyWarrior: An editor previously closed the RM out of process with this edit, and then placed a speedy deletion box on this redirect so the article could be moved to this title. That's why the redirect was deleted and the page was moved. Somewhere in between I reverted the close. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 03:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Deletion as "temporary category" was a mistake. I am very sorry. Are there any further actions which you would like me to take? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response, and further action is not needed, though I am curious as to why you restored the page only to delete/move it 3 minutes later. SkyWarrior 21:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Restoration was a knee jerk reaction to my terrible mistake. On further investigation, the talk page discussion seemed to be strongly in favour of a move. So I did it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- That makes sense, thank you (though you probably should have closed the discussion when moving the page, that would've made it easier for all of us). SkyWarrior 02:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security
Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular. ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Template:Z83
IOTA
Hello, Could you please restore IOTA (technology) to draftspace? Thanks, Benjamin (talk) 13:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! I really appreciate your help. Could you restore the talk page as well please? – Benjamin (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oops! Sorry! Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Paul Raison (art historian)
Roger, Further to our last exchange here, I have set up an account as requested. You can email me if you wish. With reference to my comments posted on this talk page on 30 March 2019, please restore the draft article you deleted. I will make changes to allay your concerns regarding copyright. There had been a number of supportive comments to the draft made by other editors, these together with the timeline of edits may be relevant to future reviewers, so it would be desirable to have the full deleted page restored, rather than simply emailing me a copy of the deleted text. With thanks, Arpad Mihalyi (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- You need to learn wikilinks. I have sent you the text and the edit history. Apart from quite a lot of work by KylieTastic, I don't see anything else in the history that is worth saving and, clearly, I cannot restore edits that contain copyvios. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Any chance of userfyng this G13 for me, RH? I have had a professional interest in such things enjoined upon me :) so I might be able to do something with it. Hope all's well! ——SerialNumber54129 12:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- (tps) It's already back in mainspace as Bardic lamp. Black Kite (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Four-aspect_LED_signal_TQ3264_S37.jpg/220px-Four-aspect_LED_signal_TQ3264_S37.jpg)
Many thanks RH/BK. I was expecting the old customary "clutch of replies", but perhaps it's too early for that ;) ——SerialNumber54129 15:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- I did look closely at this one before I deleted it. In response to your message I wasted several minutes fiddling about. If I had looked more closely, I would have said: no point in restoring Bardic lamp by the same author and with the same text exists. And here is another example of a four aspect railway light, — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted surname page
Hi RHaworth, in 2016 you deleted Loeb (surname). The page Loeb is currently a disambiguation/surname mashup which doesn't really meet the guidelines for either. I would like to split out the people into Loeb (surname) with a short lead about the origin of the name (and a reference), then clean up Loeb as a DAB page. Any problem with this? Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- No problem whatsoever. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Leschnei (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Modern Métis Woman
Hello, Recently you deleted this page draft:Modern Métis Woman for copyright infringement. I emailed Wikipedia a declaration of consent indicating that all information was used from my personal website in which I wrote. I also cited within the page myself/website. My other citations have written by third party organizations/business/institutions. Having sent the deceleration of consent, am I still required to write everything in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Modern_M%C3%A9tis_Woman with different wording? Do you mind restoring the page so that I may fix the mistakes present. Please allow me this as we are a start up non-profit trying to bring awareness to our post- secondary scholarship opportunities. I apologize if this is in the wrong section of our talk I am very new to Wikipedia and didn't know how to reach you. Much Appreciated Username538 (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC),
- Learn wikilinks. Another good reason for deletion was that the article made no attempt to explain what a Métis woman is. I have emailed the text to Zamskibf but please do not repost.. When your charity becomes notable enough that other people write about it in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone with no CoI will be interested enough to come here and write about it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)